Previously uncharacterized interactions between the folded and intrinsically disordered domains impart asymmetric effects on UBQLN2 phase separation

Shuttle protein UBQLN2 functions in protein quality control (PQC) by binding to proteasomal receptors and ubiquitinated substrates via its N‐terminal ubiquitin‐like (UBL) and C‐terminal ubiquitin‐associated (UBA) domains, respectively. Between these two folded domains are low‐complexity STI1‐I and STI1‐II regions, connected by disordered linkers. The STI1 regions bind other components, such as HSP70, that are important to the PQC functions of UBQLN2. We recently determined that the STI1‐II region enables UBQLN2 to undergo liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) to form liquid droplets in vitro and biomolecular condensates in cells. However, how the interplay between the folded (UBL/UBA) domains and the intrinsically disordered regions mediates phase separation is largely unknown. Using engineered domain deletion constructs, we found that removing the UBA domain inhibits UBQLN2 LLPS while removing the UBL domain enhances LLPS, suggesting that UBA and UBL domains contribute asymmetrically in modulating UBQLN2 LLPS. To explain these differential effects, we interrogated the interactions that involve the UBA and UBL domains across the entire UBQLN2 molecule using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. To our surprise, aside from well‐studied canonical UBL:UBA interactions, there also exist moderate interactions between the UBL and several disordered regions, including STI1‐I and residues 555–570, the latter of which is a known contributor to UBQLN2 LLPS. Our findings are essential for the understanding of both the molecular driving forces of UBQLN2 LLPS and the effects of ligand binding to UBL, UBA, or disordered regions on the phase behavior and physiological functions of UBQLN2.     

Electrostatic modulation of hnRNPA1 low‐complexity domain liquid–liquid phase separation and aggregation

Membrane‐less organelles and RNP granules are enriched in RNA and RNA‐binding proteins containing disordered regions. Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1 (hnRNPA1), a key regulating protein in RNA metabolism, localizes to cytoplasmic RNP granules including stress granules. Dysfunctional nuclear‐cytoplasmic transport and dynamic phase separation of hnRNPA1 leads to abnormal amyloid aggregation and neurodegeneration. The intrinsically disordered C‐terminal domain (CTD) of hnRNPA1 mediates both dynamic liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) and aggregation. While cellular phase separation drives the formation of membrane‐less organelles, aggregation within phase‐separated compartments has been linked to neurodegenerative diseases. To understand some of the underlying mechanisms behind protein phase separation and LLPS‐mediated aggregation, we studied LLPS of hnRNPA1 CTD in conditions that probe protein electrostatics, modulated specifically by varying pH conditions, and protein, salt and RNA concentrations. In the conditions investigated, we observed LLPS to be favored in acidic conditions, and by high protein, salt and RNA concentrations. We also observed that conditions that favor LLPS also enhance protein aggregation and fibrillation, which suggests an aggregation pathway that is LLPS‐mediated. The results reported here also suggest that LLPS can play a direct role in facilitating protein aggregation, and that changes in cellular environment that affect protein electrostatics can contribute to the pathological aggregation exhibited in neurodegeneration.     

SARS‐CoV‐2 nucleocapsid protein phase‐separates with RNA and with human hnRNPs

Tightly packed complexes of nucleocapsid protein and genomic RNA form the core of viruses and assemble within viral factories, dynamic compartments formed within the host cells associated with human stress granules. Here, we test the possibility that the multivalent RNA‐binding nucleocapsid protein (N) from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) condenses with RNA via liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) and that N protein can be recruited in phase‐separated forms of human RNA‐binding proteins associated with SG formation. Robust LLPS with RNA requires two intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs), the N‐terminal IDR and central‐linker IDR, as well as the folded C‐terminal oligomerization domain, while the folded N‐terminal domain and the C‐terminal IDR are not required. N protein phase separation is induced by addition of non‐specific RNA. In addition, N partitions in vitro into phase‐separated forms of full‐length human hnRNPs (TDP‐43, FUS, hnRNPA2) and their low‐complexity domains (LCs). These results provide a potential mechanism for the role of N in SARS‐CoV‐2 viral genome packing and in host‐protein co‐opting necessary for viral replication and infectivity.     

Beta turn propensity and a model polymer scaling exponent identify intrinsically disordered phase-separating proteins

The complex cellular milieu can spontaneously demix, or phase separate, in a process controlled in part by intrinsically disordered (ID) proteins. A protein''s propensity to phase separate is thought to be driven by a preference for protein–protein over protein–solvent interactions. The hydrodynamic size of monomeric proteins, as quantified by the polymer scaling exponent (v), is driven by a similar balance. We hypothesized that mean v, as predicted by protein sequence, would be smaller for proteins with a strong propensity to phase separate. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed protein databases containing subsets of proteins that are folded, disordered, or disordered and known to spontaneously phase separate. We find that the phase-separating disordered proteins, on average, had lower calculated values of v compared with their non-phase-separating counterparts. Moreover, these proteins had a higher sequence-predicted propensity for β-turns. Using a simple, surface area-based model, we propose a physical mechanism for this difference: transient β-turn structures reduce the desolvation penalty of forming a protein-rich phase and increase exposure of atoms involved in π/sp² valence electron interactions. By this mechanism, β-turns could act as energetically favored nucleation points, which may explain the increased propensity for turns in ID regions (IDRs) utilized biologically for phase separation. Phase-separating IDRs, non-phase-separating IDRs, and folded regions could be distinguished by combining v and β-turn propensity. Finally, we propose a new algorithm, ParSe (partition sequence), for predicting phase-separating protein regions, and which is able to accurately identify folded, disordered, and phase-separating protein regions based on the primary sequence.     

Multiple Modes of Protein–Protein Interactions Promote RNP Granule Assembly

Eukaryotic cells are known to contain a wide variety of RNA–protein assemblies, collectively referred to as RNP granules. RNP granules form from a combination of RNA–RNA, protein–RNA, and protein–protein interactions. In addition, RNP granules are enriched in proteins with intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs), which are frequently appended to a well-folded domain of the same protein. This structural organization of RNP granule components allows for a diverse set of protein–protein interactions including traditional structured interactions between well-folded domains, interactions of short linear motifs in IDRs with the surface of well-folded domains, interactions of short motifs within IDRs that weakly interact with related motifs, and weak interactions involving at most transient ordering of IDRs and folded domains with other components. In addition, both well-folded domains and IDRs in granule components frequently interact with RNA and thereby can contribute to RNP granule assembly. We discuss the contribution of these interactions to liquid–liquid phase separation and the possible role of phase separation in the assembly of RNP granules. We expect that these principles also apply to other non-membrane bound organelles and large assemblies in the cell.     

Computational Screening of Phase-separating Proteins

Phase separation is an important mechanism that mediates the compartmentalization of proteins in cells. Proteins that can undergo phase separation in cells share certain typical sequence features, like intrinsically disordered regions(IDRs) and multiple modular domains. Sequencebased analysis tools are commonly used in the screening of these proteins. However, current phase separation predictors are mostly designed for IDR-containing proteins, thus inevitably overlook the phase-separating proteins with relatively low IDR content. Features other than amino acid sequence could provide crucial information for identifying possible phase-separating proteins: protein–protein interaction(PPI) networks show multivalent interactions that underlie phase separation process; post-translational modifications(PTMs) are crucial in the regulation of phase separation behavior; spherical structures revealed in immunofluorescence(IF) images indicate condensed droplets formed by phase-separating proteins, distinguishing these proteins from non-phaseseparating proteins. Here, we summarize the sequence-based tools for predicting phaseseparating proteins and highlight the importance of incorporating PPIs, PTMs, and IF images into phase separation prediction in future studies.     

Fused in sarcoma undergoes cold denaturation: Implications for phase separation

The mediation of liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) for fused in sarcoma (FUS) protein is generally attributed to the low-complexity, disordered domains and is enhanced at low temperature. The role of FUS folded domains on the LLPS process remains relatively unknown since most studies are mainly based on fragmented FUS domains. Here, we investigate the effect of metabolites on full-length (FL) FUS LLPS using turbidity assays and differential interference contrast (DIC) microscopy, and explore the behavior of the folded domains by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. FL FUS LLPS is maximal at low concentrations of glucose and glutamate, moderate concentrations of NaCl, Zn²⁺, and Ca²⁺ and at the isoelectric pH. The FUS RNA recognition motif (RRM) and zinc-finger (ZnF) domains are found to undergo cold denaturation above 0°C at a temperature that is determined by the conformational stability of the ZnF domain. Cold unfolding exposes buried nonpolar residues that can participate in LLPS-promoting hydrophobic interactions. Therefore, these findings constitute the first evidence that FUS globular domains may have an active role in LLPS under cold stress conditions and in the assembly of stress granules, providing further insight into the environmental regulation of LLPS.     

‘RNA modulation of transport properties and stability in phase-separated condensates

One of the key mechanisms employed by cells to control their spatiotemporal organization is the formation and dissolution of phase-separated condensates. The balance between condensate assembly and disassembly can be critically regulated by the presence of RNA. In this work, we use a chemically-accurate sequence-dependent coarse-grained model for proteins and RNA to unravel the impact of RNA in modulating the transport properties and stability of biomolecular condensates. We explore the phase behavior of several RNA-binding proteins such as FUS, hnRNPA1, and TDP-43 proteins along with that of their corresponding prion-like domains and RNA recognition motifs from absence to moderately high RNA concentration. By characterizing the phase diagram, key molecular interactions, surface tension, and transport properties of the condensates, we report a dual RNA-induced behavior: on the one hand, RNA enhances phase separation at low concentration as long as the RNA radius of gyration is comparable to that of the proteins, whereas at high concentration, it inhibits the ability of proteins to self-assemble independently of its length. On the other hand, along with the stability modulation, the viscosity of the condensates can be considerably reduced at high RNA concentration as long as the length of the RNA chains is shorter than that of the proteins. Conversely, long RNA strands increase viscosity even at high concentration, but barely modify protein self-diffusion which mainly depends on RNA concentration and on the effect RNA has on droplet density. On the whole, our work rationalizes the different routes by which RNA can regulate phase separation and condensate dynamics, as well as the subsequent aberrant rigidification implicated in the emergence of various neuropathologies and age-related diseases.     

N-terminal Domain of TDP43 Enhances Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation of Globular Proteins

Liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) of proteins is involved in a growing number of cellular processes. Most proteins with LLPS harbor intrinsically disordered regions (IDR), which serve as a guideline to search for cellular proteins that potentially phase separate. Herein, we reveal that oligomerization lowers the barriers for LLPS and could act as a general mechanism to enhance LLPS of proteins domains independent of IDR. Using TDP43 as a model system, we found that deleting its IDR resulted in LLPS that was dependent on the oligomerization of the N-terminal domain (NTD). Replacing TDP43′s NTD with other oligomerization domains enhanced the LLPS proportionately to the state of oligomerization. In addition to TDP43, fusing NTD to other globular proteins without known LLPS behavior also drove their phase separation in a manner dependent on oligomerization. Finally, we demonstrate that heterooligomers composed of NTD-fused proteins can be driven into droplets through NTD interactions. Our results potentiate a new paradigm for using oligomerization domains as a signature to systematically identify cellular proteins with LLPS behavior, thus broadening the scope of this exciting research field.     

Hydrophobic Compounds Reshape Membrane Domains

Cell membranes have a complex lateral organization featuring domains with distinct composition, also known as rafts, which play an essential role in cellular processes such as signal transduction and protein trafficking. In vivo, perturbations of membrane domains (e.g., by drugs or lipophilic compounds) have major effects on the activity of raft-associated proteins and on signaling pathways, but they are difficult to characterize because of the small size of the domains, typically below optical resolution. Model membranes, instead, can show macroscopic phase separation between liquid-ordered and liquid-disordered domains, and they are often used to investigate the driving forces of membrane lateral organization. Studies in model membranes have shown that some lipophilic compounds perturb membrane domains, but it is not clear which chemical and physical properties determine domain perturbation. The mechanisms of domain stabilization and destabilization are also unknown. Here we describe the effect of six simple hydrophobic compounds on the lateral organization of phase-separated model membranes consisting of saturated and unsaturated phospholipids and cholesterol. Using molecular simulations, we identify two groups of molecules with distinct behavior: aliphatic compounds promote lipid mixing by distributing at the interface between liquid-ordered and liquid-disordered domains; aromatic compounds, instead, stabilize phase separation by partitioning into liquid-disordered domains and excluding cholesterol from the disordered domains. We predict that relatively small concentrations of hydrophobic species can have a broad impact on domain stability in model systems, which suggests possible mechanisms of action for hydrophobic compounds in vivo.     

Amphidinol 3 preferentially binds to cholesterol in disordered domains and disrupts membrane phase separation

Amphidinol 3 (AM3), a polyhydroxy-polyene metabolite from the dinoflagellate Amphidinium klebsii, possesses potent antifungal activity. AM3 is known to interact directly with membrane sterols and permeabilize membranes by forming pores. Because AM3 binds to sterols such as cholesterol and ergosterol, it can be assumed that AM3 has some impact on lipid rafts, which are membrane domains rich in sphingolipids and cholesterol. Hence, we first examined the effect of AM3 on phase-separated liposomes, in which raft-like ordered and non-raft-like disordered domains are segregated. Consequently, AM3 disrupted the phase separation at 22 μM, as in the case of methyl-β-cyclodextrin, a well-known raft-disrupter that extracts sterol from membranes. The surface plasmon resonance measurements and dye leakage assays show that AM3 preferentially recognizes cholesterol in the disordered membrane, which may reflect a weaker lipid-cholesterol interaction in disordered membrane than in ordered membrane. Finally, to gain insight into the AM3-induced coalescence of membrane phases, we measured membrane fluidity using fluorescence correlation spectroscopy, demonstrating that AM3 significantly increases the order of disordered phase. Together, AM3 preferentially binds to the disordered phase rather than the ordered phase, and enhances the order of the disordered phase, consequently blending the separated phases.     

A ubiquitin-independent proteasome pathway controls activation of the CARD8 inflammasome

CARD8 is a pattern-recognition receptor that forms a caspase-1-activating inflammasome. CARD8 undergoes constitutive autoproteolysis, generating an N-terminal (NT) fragment with a disordered region and a ZU5 domain and a C-terminal (CT) fragment with UPA and CARD domains. Dipeptidyl peptidase 8 and dipeptidyl peptidase 9 inhibitors, including Val-boroPro, accelerate the degradation of the NT fragment via a poorly characterized proteasome-mediated pathway, thereby releasing the inflammatory CT fragment from autoinhibition. Here, we show that the core 20S proteasome, which degrades disordered and misfolded proteins independent of ubiquitin modification, controls activation of the CARD8 inflammasome. In unstressed cells, we discovered that the 20S proteasome degrades just the NT disordered region, leaving behind the folded ZU5, UPA, and CARD domains to act as an inhibitor of inflammasome assembly. However, in Val-boroPro–stressed cells, we show the 20S proteasome degrades the entire NT fragment, perhaps due to ZU5 domain unfolding, freeing the CT fragment from autoinhibition. Taken together, these results show that the susceptibility of the CARD8 NT domain to 20S proteasome-mediated degradation controls inflammasome activation.     

A predictive coarse-grained model for position-specific effects of post-translational modifications

Biomolecules undergo liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS), resulting in the formation of multicomponent protein-RNA membraneless organelles in cells. However, the physiological and pathological role of post-translational modifications (PTMs) on the biophysics of phase behavior is only beginning to be probed. To study the effect of PTMs on LLPS in silico, we extend our transferable coarse-grained model of intrinsically disordered proteins to include phosphorylated and acetylated amino acids. Using the parameters for modified amino acids available for fixed-charge atomistic force fields, we parameterize the size and atomistic hydropathy of the coarse-grained-modified amino acid beads and, hence, the interactions between the modified and natural amino acids. We then elucidate how the number and position of phosphorylated and acetylated residues alter the protein’s single-chain compactness and its propensity to phase separate. We show that both the number and the position of phosphorylated threonines/serines or acetylated lysines can serve as a molecular on/off switch for phase separation in the well-studied disordered regions of Fused in Sarcoma (FUS) and DDX3X, respectively. We also compare modified residues to their commonly used PTM mimics for their impact on chain properties. Importantly, we show that the model can predict and capture experimentally measured differences in the phase behavior for position-specific modifications, showing that the position of modifications can dictate phase separation. In sum, this model will be useful for studying LLPS of post-translationally modified intrinsically disordered proteins and predicting how modifications control phase behavior with position-specific resolution.     

A natively unfolded toxin domain uses its receptor as a folding template

Natively unfolded proteins range from molten globules to disordered coils. They are abundant in eukaryotic genomes and commonly involved in molecular interactions. The essential N-terminal translocation domains of colicin toxins from Escherichia coli are disordered bacterial proteins that bind at least one protein of the Tol or Ton family. The colicin N translocation domain (ColN-(1-90)), which binds to the C-terminal domain of TolA (TolA-(296-421)), shows a disordered far-UV CD spectrum, no near-UV CD signal, and non-cooperative thermal unfolding. As expected, TolA-(296-421) displays both secondary structure in far-UV CD and tertiary structure in near-UV CD. Furthermore it shows a cooperative unfolding transition at 65 degrees C. CD spectra of the 1:1 complex show both increased secondary structure and colicin N-specific near-UV CD signals. A new cooperative thermal transition at 35 degrees C is followed by the unchanged unfolding behavior of TolA-(296-421). Fluorescence and surface plasmon resonance confirm that the new unfolding transition accompanies dissociation of ColN-(1-90). Hence upon binding the disordered structure of ColN-(1-90) converts to a cooperatively folded domain without altering the TolA-(296-421) structure.     

Induced folding in RNA recognition by Arabidopsis thaliana DCL1

DCL1 is the ribonuclease that carries out miRNA biogenesis in plants. The enzyme has two tandem double stranded RNA binding domains (dsRBDs) in its C-terminus. Here we show that the first of these domains binds precursor RNA fragments when isolated and cooperates with the second domain in the recognition of substrate RNA. Remarkably, despite showing RNA binding activity, this domain is intrinsically disordered. We found that it acquires a folded conformation when bound to its substrate, being the first report of a complete dsRBD folding upon binding. The free unfolded form shows tendency to adopt folded conformations, and goes through an unfolded bound state prior to the folding event. The significance of these results is discussed by comparison with the behavior of other dsRBDs.     

DNA-cationic surfactant interactions are different for double- and single-stranded DNA

The stability of DNA in solution and the phase behavior in mixtures with dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide (DTAB) were investigated. By means of circular dichroism, UV absorption, and differential scanning calorimetry, we found that for dilute solutions of DNA with no addition of salt the DNA molecules are in the single-stranded conformation, whereas the addition of a small amount of NaBr, 1 mM, is sufficient to stabilize the DNA double-helix. Furthermore, at higher DNA concentrations, native DNA becomes the most stable structure, which is due to a self-screening effect. By phase diagram determinations of the DNA-surfactant system, we found that the effect of salt on phase behavior mainly relates to a difference in interaction of the amphiphile between single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) and double-stranded DNA (dsDNA). The difference in association between ss and dsDNA with surfactants of different chain lengths can be interpreted in terms of an interplay between hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions, the latter being influenced by polymer flexibility. In this way, a nonmonotonic variation can be rationalized. A crossing of the phase separation lines with DNA concentration can be rationalized in terms of a change in relative stability of ss and dsDNA. The fact that ssDNA phase separates earlier than dsDNA in association with DTAB, may serve as a basis for a method of easily separating dsDNA from ssDNA by the addition of surfactant; this is verified as monitored by circular dichroism measurements.