Effect of prostaglandins E1, E2 and F2α on neutrophil aggregation

Recently we have found that chemotactic factors stimulate neutrophils in suspension to aggregate. Because of an obvious analogy to platelet aggregation, we examined the influence of three prostaglandins on this process. Prostaglandins E₁, E₂ and F_2α alone did not cause aggregation of the neutrophils but were able to partially inhibit the aggregation response induced by the synthetic chemotactic tripeptide, formly-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine. The minimal inhibitory concentrations for prostaglandins E₁, E₂ and F_2α were 10⁻⁷, 10⁻⁶ and 10⁻⁵M, respectively. These results are similar to those found for the prostaglandin-induced inhibition of platelet aggregation. It may be, therefore, that neutrophil aggregation, like platelet aggregation, is modulated by intracellular prostaglandins and other products of arachidonic acid metabolism.     

Effects of intracerebroventricular administration of PGE1, E2 and F2α on electrically induced convulsions in mice

Intracerebroventricular administration of prostaglandins E₁ or E₂ was shown to block, while PGF_2α increased the incidence of tonic convulsion due to electroshock in mice. The Prostaglandins were administered intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) to conscious mice by a modification of Haley and McCormick's method (1) prior to a transcorneal maximal electroshock (MES) or a transcorneal supra-maximal electroshock (SMES). PGE₁ and PGE₂ i.c.v. blocked the tonic hindlimb extension (THE) and protected the animals from death induced by MES with ED₅₀'s for PGE₁ and PGE₂ for inhibition of the THE of 6.6 (4.3–12.0) μg/mouse i.c.v. and 13.3 (8.9–22.4) μg/mouse i.c.v. respectively. When PGE₂ was administered intraperitoneally (i.p.) in doses as high as 4.0 mg/kg it did not block the THE. However, the duration of the THE as well as the mortality were reduced by doses of 0.5–4.0 mg/kg PGE₂ i.p.. Both PGE₁ and PGE₂ were shown to cause a dose related significant (p<.001) decrease in the duration of the THE with SMES in doses of 1–10 μg/mouse i.c.v. for PGE₁ and 2–40 μg/mouse i.c.v. for PGE₂. PGF_2α, administered i.c.v. prior to a transcorneal electroshock equivalent to a current at the ED₁ level, increased the incidence of the THE as well as the mortality in doses of 20–50 μg/mouse.     

Prostaglandin E2 secretion by day-6 to day-9 equine embryos

Prostaglandin E₂ (PGE₂) secreted by Day-6, Day-7, Day-8 and Day-9 equine embryos (ovulation = Day 0) during in vitro incubation was measured by radioimmunoassay. Embryonic PGE₂ secretion (ng/embryo/24 hr) was detectable on Day 6 (0.27±0.39), tended to increase (P <0.1) on Day 7 (0.57±0.88), and increased significantly (P <0.05) on Day 8 (2.23±0.86) and Day 9 (4.13±0.71). Embryo diameter at the start of the incubation period was linearly correlated (P <0.01) to embryonic PGE₂ secretion.     

Prostaglandins E1 and E2 stimulate release of intestinal brush border enzymes

Rat small bowel was perfused and in the absence of biliary and pancreatic secretion. Intraluminal release of sucrase, alkaline phosphatase, aminopeptidase and enterokinase was significantly increased after administration of PG E₁ and E₂ 1 and 5 μg/kg. This suggests a direct stimulation of the intestinal mucosa, which might be mediated through cyclic AMP ; dibutyryl cAMP significantly stimulates intraluminal release of proteins, sucrase and enterokinase.     

The lack of involvement of central nervous system in the antiarrhythmic effects of prostaglandins E2, F2α, and I2 in cat

The role of the central nervous system (CNS) in the antiarrhythmic effects of prostaglandins (PGs) E₂, F_2α, and I₂ was studied by administering each agent into the left lateral cerebral ventricle (i.c.v. administration) of chloralose-anesthetized cats. The cardiac arrhythmias were produced by intravenous (i.v.) infusion of ouabain (1 μg/kg/min). The PGs E₂, F_2α and I₂ on i.c.v. administration in the dose range of 1 ng to 10 μg failed to inhibit ouabain-induced cardiac arrhythmias. However, when infused i.v., PGE₂ (1 μg/kg/min), PGF_2α (5 μg/kg/min), and PGI₂ (2 μg/kg/min) effectively suppressed these arrhythmias. The standard antiarrhythmic drug propanolol (0.5–8.0 mg)oni.c.v.administration also significantly reduced the ouabain-induced cardiac arrhythmias. It is suggested that the CNS is not the site of action of PGs E₂, F_2α, and I₂ in antagonising the ouabain-induced cardiotoxicity in cats.     

Interactions of prostaglandins with subpopulations of ovine luteal cells. I. Stimulatory effects of prostaglandins E1, E2 and I2

Preparations of small and large steroidogenic cells from enzymatically dispersed ovine corpora lutea were utilized to study the effects of luteinizing hormone (LH) and prostaglandins (PG) E₁, E₂ and I₂. Cells were allowed to attach to culture dishes overnight and were incubated with either LH (100 ng/ml), PGE₂, PGE₂, or PGI₂ (250 ng/ml each). The secretion of progesterone by large cells was stimulated by all prostaglandins tested (P < 0.05) while the moderate stimulation observed after LH treatment was attributable to contamination of the large cell population with small cells. Prostaglandins E₁ and E₂ had no effect on progesterone secretion by small cells, while LH was stimulatory at all times (0.5 to 4 hr) and PGI₂ was stimulatory by 4 hr. Additional studies were conducted to determine if the effects of PGE₂ upon steroidogenesis in large cells were correlated with stimulated activity of adenylate cyclase. In both plated and suspended cells PGE₂ caused an increase (P < 0.05) in the rate of progesterone secretion but had no effect upon the activity of adenylate cyclase or cAMP concentrations within cells or in the incubation media. Exposure of luteal cells to forskolin, a nonhormonal stimulator of adenylate cyclase, resulted in marked increases in all parameters of cyclase activity but had no effect on progesterone secretion. These data suggest that the actions of prostaglandins E₁, E₂ and I₂ are directed primarily toward the large cells of the ovine corpus luteum and cast doubt upon the role of adenylate cyclase as the sole intermediary in regulation of progesterone secretion in this cell type.     

Effects of prostaglandin E1 and isoproterenol on cyclic AMP content of human fibroblasts modified by time and cell density in subculture

In confluent cultures of “young” (< 30 generations) human fibroblasts, maximally effective concentrations of prostaglandin E₁ (5.6 μM) and isoproterenol (2 μM) increased cyclic AMP content several hundred-fold and approximately 30-fold, respectively. On the first day after initiation of cultures at either low (approx. 3 · 10⁵ cells) or high (approx. s · 10⁶ cells) cell density the magnitude of the isoproterenol effect was similar to that in confluent cultures. It increased during the next few days, reaching a maximum around day 2–3, and then declined. On any day during the period of subculture, the magnitude of the isoproterenol effect was inversely related to cell density. Alterations in response to prostaglandin E₁ as a function of time in subculture or cell density were less dramatic. The effects of prostaglandin E₁ were, however, smaller at some point during the first few days of subculture than after day 7, and when effects of prostaglandin E₁ were minimal, those of isoproterenol were maximal and approached those of prostaglandin E₁. On any day of subculture, cells in cultures of higher density tended to accumulate more cyclic AMP in response to prostaglandin E₁ than did those in low density cultures. The effects of prostaglandin E₁ and isoproterenol on cyclic AMP content were qualitatively similar in “young” and in “old” (> 60 generations in culture) human fibroblasts although the changes associated with duration of subculture and cell density tended to be less marked with “old” cells. In the “young” fibroblasts responsiveness to isoproterenol and prostaglandin E₁ appears to correlate with cell morphology and with the fractional rate of growth in subcultures. It is suggested that the capacities of the fibroblasts to respond to these two agents may be altered independently during growth of human fibroblasts.     

Prostaglandin E2 opunteracts the effects of PGF2α in indomethacin treated cycling gilts

Twenty crossbred gilts with at least 2 consecutive estrous cycles of 18 to 21 days in length were used to study the effects of prostaglandins E₂ and F₂α (PGE₂ and PGF₂α) on luteal function in indomethacin (INDO) treated cycling gilts. Intrauterine and jugular vein catheters were surgically palced before day 7 of the treatment estrous cycle and gilts were randomly assigned to 1 of 5 treatment groups (4/groups). With exception of the controls (Group I) all gilts received 3.3 mg/kg INDO every 8 h, Groups III, IV and V received 2.5 mg PGF₂; 2.5 mg PGF₂α + 400 μg PGE₂ every 4 hr, or 400μg PGE₂ every 4 h, respectively. All treatments were initiated on day 7 and continued until estrus or day 23. Jugular blood for progesterone analysis was collected twice daily from day 7 to 30. Estradiol-17β (E₂-17β) concentrations were dtermined in samples collected twice daily, from 2 d before until 2 d following the day of estrus onset. When compared to pretreatment values, estrous cycle length was unaffected (P>0.05) in Group I, prolonged (P<0.05) in Groups II, IV and V; and shortened (P<0.05) in Group III. The decline in plasma progesterone concentration that normally occurs around day 15 was unaffected (P>.05) in Group I; delayed (P<0.05) in Groups II, IV and V; and occurred early (P<0.05) in Group III. Mean E₂-17β remained high (31.2 ± 4.9 to 49.3 ± 3.1 pg/ml) in Groups III and IV, while the mean concentrations in Groups III and V varied considerably (17.0 ± 2.0 to 52.2 ± 3.5 pg/ml). The results of this study have shown that PGE₂ will counteract the effects of PGF₂α in INDO treated cycling gilts. The inclusion of PGF₂α appeared to either stimulate E₂-17β secretion or maintain it at a higher level than other treatments.     

Failure of prostaglandins E1 and E2 to alter canine gastric mucosal cyclic nucleotides

The action of prostaglandins and indomethacin on gastric mucosal cyclic nucleotide concentrations was evaluated in 18 anesthetized mongrel dogs. Prostaglandins E₁ (PGE₁) and E₂ (PGE₂) (25 μg/kg bolus, then 2 μg/kg/min) were administered both intravenously (4 experiments; femoral vein) and directly into the gastric mucosal circulation (10 experiments; superior mesenteric artery). The possible synergistic effect of pre-treatment and continuous arterial infusion of indomethacin (5 mg/kg bolus for 5 min, then 5 mg/min), a prostaglandin synthetase inhibitor, with PGE₂ was studied in 4 experiments. Antral and fundic mucosa were biopsied and measured by radioimmunoassay for cyclic nucleotides. Doses of PGE₁ and PGE₂ which inhibited histamine-stimulated canine gastric acid secretion did not significantly alter antral or fundic mucosal cyclic nucleotide concentrations. Concomitant infusion of PGE₂ with indomethacin did not potentiate the mucosal nucleotide response compared to PGE₂ alone. These studies fail to implicate cyclic nucleotides as mediators of the inhibitory acid response induced by PGE₁ or PGE₂ in intact dog stomach.     

Prostaglandins E1 and E2 stimulate the proliferation of pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells

Prostaglandins E₁ and E₂ are thought to be inhibitors of the growth of systemic vascular smooth muscle cells (SMC). However, their effect on the proliferation of SMC from the pulmonary artery (PA) has not been described and was the subject of this investigation. Cultures of bovine PA SMC were exposed to PGE₁ and PGE₂ under various conditions and their growth was assessed. PGE₁ and PGE₂ did not inhibit the growth of PA SMC in 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), but instead caused a dose dependent (10 ng - 1 μg/ml) increase in [³H]-thymidine incorporation when added to cultures containing 0.5% FCS; the highest doses resulted in 95% and 75% increases in [³H]-thymidine uptake at 24 hours with PGE₁ and PGE₂ respectively. This was accompanied by a modest increase in actual cell numbers (e.g., 20% with 1 μg/ml PGE₁). Furthermore, PGE₁ could mimic insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1) by potentiating the stimulation of SMC growth by fibroblast growth factor, suggesting that PGE₁ may act as a progression factor in the growth cycle of these cells. There was, however, no effect of PGE₁ on the proliferation of bovine aortic SMC. We conclude that, contrary to most reported effects on systemic SMC, PGE₁ and PGE₂ do not inhibit the proliferation of PA SMC but rather stimulate it.     

Prostaglandin E1 and F2α specific binding in bovine corpora lutea: Comparison with luteolytic effects

Preliminary characterization indicated the presence of separate prostaglandin (PG)E₁ and (PG)F_2α binding sites in membrane fractions prepared from bovine corpora lutea. These differ in the rate and temperature dependence of the specific binding. Equilibrium binding data indicate the apparent dissociation constants as 1.32 × 10⁻⁹M and 2.1 × 10⁻⁸M for PGE₁ and PGF_2α, respectively. Competition of several natural prostaglandins for the PGE₁ and PGF_2α bovine luteal specific binding sites indicates specificity for the 9-keto or 9α-hydroxyl moiety, respectively. Differences in relative ability to inhibit ³H-PG binding were found due to sensitivity to the absence or presence of the 5,6-cis-double bond as well.Bovine luteal function was affected following treatment of heifers with 25 mg PGF_2α as measured by reduced estrous cycle length, decreased corpus luteum size and significantly decreased plasma progesterone levels. In contrast, treatment with 25 mg PGE₁ resulted in cycle lengths comparable to those of non-treated herdmates with no apparent modification in corpus luteum size. However, plasma progesterone levels were increased significantly following PGE₁ treatment compared to pretreatment values. In so far as data obtained on PGF_2α relative binding affinity to the bovine CL can be compared to data obtained independently on PGF_2α induced luteolysis in the bovine, PGF_2α relative binding to the CL and luteolysis appeared to be associated. By similar reasoning, there was no apparent relationship between PGE₁ relative binding affinity in the luteal fractions and luteolysis in estrous cyclic cattle.     

Prostaglandin E1 and F2α specific binding in bovine corpora lutea: Comparison with luteolytic effects

Preliminary characterization indicated the presence of separate prostaglandin (PG)E₁ and (PG)F_2α binding sites in membrane fractions prepared from bovine corpora lutea. These differ in the rate and temperature dependence of the specific binding. Equilibrium binding data indicate the apparent dissociation constants as 1.32 × 10⁻⁹M and 2.1 × 10⁻⁸M for PGE₁ and PGF_2α, respectively. Competition of several natural prostaglandins for the PGE₁ and PGF_2α bovine luteal specific binding sites indicates specificity for the 9-keto or 9α-hydroxyl moiety, respectively. Differences in relative ability to inhibit ³H-PG binding were found due to sensitivity to the absence or presence of the 5,6-cis-double bond as well.Bovine luteal function was affected following treatment of heifers with 25 mg PGF_2α as measured by reduced estrous cycle length, decreased corpus luteum size and significantly decreased plasma progesterone levels. In contrast, treatment with 25 mg PGE₁ resulted in cycle lengths comparable to those of non-treated herdmates with no apparent modification in corpus luteum size. However, plasma progesterone levels were increased significantly following PGE₁ treatment compared to pretreatment values. In so far as data obtained in vitro on PGF_2α relative binding affinity to the bovine CL can be compared to data obtained independently in vitro on PGF_2α induced luteolysis in the bovine, PGF_2α relative binding to the CL and luteolysis appeared to be associated. By similar reasoning, there was no apparent relationship between PGE₁ relative binding affinity in the luteal fractions and luteolysis in estrous cyclic cattle.     

Specific prostaglandine E1 and A1 binding sites in rat a dipocyte plasma membranes

Rat adipocyte plasma membranes sacs have been shown to be a sensitive and specific system for studying prostaglandin binding. The binding of prostaglandin E₁ and prostaglandin A₁ increases linearly with increasing protein concentration, and is a temperature-sensitive process. Prostaglandin E₁ binding is not ion dependent, but is enhanced by GTP. Prostaglandin A₁ binding is stimulated by ions, but is not affected by GTP.Discrete binding sites for prostaglandin E₁ and A₁ were found. Scatchard plot analysis showed that the binding of both prostaglandins was biphasic, indicating two types of binding sites. Prostaglandin E₁ had association constants of 4.9 · 10⁹ 1/mole and 4 · 10⁸ 1/mole, while the prostaglandin A₁ association constants and binding capacities varied according to the ionic composition of the buffer. In Tris-HCl buffer, the prostaglandin A₁ association constants were 8.3 · 10⁸ 1/mole and 5.7 · 10⁷ 1/mole, while in the Krebs—Ringer Tris buffer, the results were 1.2 · 10⁹ 1/mole and 8.6 · 10⁶ 1/mole.Some cross-reactivity between prostaglandin E₁ and A₁ was found for their respective binding sites. Using Scatchard plot analysis, it was found that a 10-fold excess of prostaglandin E₁ inhibited prostaglandin A₁ binding by 1–20% depending upon the concentration of prostaglandin A₁ used. Prostaglandin E₁ competes primarily for the A prostaglandin high-affinity binding site. Similar Scatchard analysis using a 20-fold excess of prostaglandin A₁ inhibited prostaglandin E₁ binding by 10–40%. Prostaglandin A₁ was found to compete primarily for the E prostaglandin low-affinity receptor.All of the bound [³H]prostaglandin E₁, but only 64% of the bound [³H]-prostaglandin A₁ can be recovered unmetabolized from the fat cell membrane. There is no non-specific binding of prostaglandin E₁, but 10–15% of prostaglandin A₁ binding to adipocyte membranes is non-specific. Using a parallel line assay to measure relative affinities for the E binding site, prostaglandin E₁ > prostaglandin A₂ > prostaglandin F_2α. Prostaglandin E₂ and 16,16-dimethyl prostaglandin E₂ were equipotent with prostaglandin E₁, while other prostaglandins had lower relative affinities. 7-Oxa-13-prostynoic acid does not appear to antagonize prostaglandin activity in adipocytes at the level of the receptor.     

Molecular conformation of prostaglandin E2

The crystal and molecular structure of prostaglandin E₂ (PGE₂) has been determined by X-ray diffraction. The compound crystallizes in the triclinic space group P1 with Z = 1 and , , , α = 87.347°, β = 94.042°, and γ = 91.010°. Gauche-gauche interactions appear in both side chains. The efficient molecular packing and hydrogen bonding network appears to stabilize the observed molecular conformation.     

Blood pressure and heart rate effects of prostaglandin E2 and F2α produced by intracerebroventricular injections in cats

Blood pressure and heart rate effects of prostaglandin E₂ and F_2α were examines after administrating each agent into the left lateral brain ventricle of chloralose-anesthethized cats. Administration of prostaglandin E₂ (1 μg) resulted in significant, prolonged increases in arterial pressure (25.7 ± 6.7 mm Hg) and heart rate (19.4 ± 7.7 beats/min). These responses were mimicked when the same dose of prostagland E₂ was administered into the restricted to the lateral and third ventricles via cannulation of the cerebral aqueduct, whereas no significant cardiovascular occured with administration into the fourth ventricle. Intravenous injection of prostaglandin E₂ resulted in a transient decrease in blood pressure but no change in heart rate. Administration of prostaglandin F_2α (1 and 3 μg) into the CNS produced no significant cardiovascular responses. The same was true when prostaglandin F_2α was administered by the intravenous route. These results indicate that pronounced cardiovascular effects can be produced by administering prostaglandin E₂ but not F_2α into the CNSm and that the central site of action of prostaglandin E₂ is in the forebrain.     

Determination of prostaglandin F2α, E2, D2 and 6-keto-F1α in human cerebrospinal fluid

Prostaglandin (PG)F_2α, E₂, D₂ and 6-keto-F_1α were determined in human cerebrospinal fluid by a mass spectrometric technique. The samples were obtained from 12 patients with suspected intracranial disease. A 64 fold variation in PG levels was observed. The major PG was 6-keto-F_1α (0.12–15 ng/ml). PGF_2α and PGE₂ were present in lower concentrations PGD₂ was below the level of detection (0.05 ng/ml) except in one patient with extremely high total levels of PGs.     

Neurological and electroencephalographic changes in newborns treated with prostaglandins E2 and E2

Six newborns with obstructive right heart lesions were examined neurologically and electroencephalographically during treatment with prostaglandin (PG) E₁ or E₂ given to maintain patency of the ductus arteriosus and to increase pulmonary blood flow. PG was administered intravenously or intraarterially in the aortic isthmus proximal to the ductus arteriosus. Besides a rise in arterial oxygen saturation, all patients had some sign of central nervous system involvement. The electroencephalogram showed minor changes suggestive of sedation. In addition, three patients in whom PG given intravenously presented various combinations of neurological abnormalities (“myoclonic jerks”, apnoeic spells, hiccup) of subcortical origin. Side-effects subsided after stopping the treatment anf posed no problem in the management of the patients. These findings confirm the usefulness and safety of the PG therapy and indicate that the intraaortic route of administration is preferable.     

Differential effects of detergents and dimethylsulfoxide on membrane prostaglandin E1 and F2α receptors

Pretreatment of membranes for 1 hr at 4° with up to 0.1% Triton X-100 (TX-100) and sodium desoxycholate (SDC), resulted in a greater loss of [³H] prostaglandin (PG)F₂α binding compared to E₁ binding. Lubrol WX (LWX) tended to cause a greater loss of [³H]PGF₂α than E₁ binding. However, the differential loss was not as marked as with TX-100 or SDC. Triton X-305 was relatively ineffective, but loss of [³H]PGE₁ binding was greater than for PGF₂α. Increasing concentrations of dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) progressively inhibited PGF₂α binding without affecting PGE₁ binding. The detergent, but not DMSO, induced losses of membrane PG binding were due to solubilization of the receptors. Greater amounts of membrane protein and phospholipids were solubilized at detergent (TX-100 and SDC) concentrations that solubilized 100% of PGE₁ receptors compared to 100% solubilization of F₂α receptors. Neither the duration of preincubation nor the amount of membrane protein chosen were responsible for differential PGE₁ and F₂α receptor losses. These differential membrane PG receptor losses raise the possibility of differences in PGE₁ and F₂α receptors association with the membrane structure.     

Prostaglandins and renin release: III. Effects of PGE1, E2 F2α and D2 on renin release from rabbit renal cortical slices

We have investigated the direct effects of prostaglandins E₁, E₂, F_2α and D₂ on renin release from rabbit renal cortical slices. Prostaglandin E₁ (PGE₁) was the most potent stimulant of renin release, while PGE₂ was 20–30 fold less active. PGF_2α was found not to be an inhibitor of renin release as reported by others, but rather a weak agonist. PGD₂ up to a concentration of 10 μg/ml had no activity in this system. That the stimulation of renin release by PGE₁ is a direct effect is supported by the finding that PGE₁-induced release is not blocked by L-propranolol or by Δ^5,8,11,14-eicosatetraynoic acid (ETYA), a prostaglandin synthesis is inhibitor. The fatty acid precursor of PGE₁, Δ^8,11,14-eicosatrienoic acid, also stimulated renin release, an effect which was blocked by ETYA. In addition to the above findings, ethanol, a compound frequently used to dissolve prostaglandins, was shown to inhibit renin release.     

The action of prostaglandin E2 and F1α on myocardial ischaemia-infarction arrhythmias in the dog

Prostaglandin E₂ and F_1α infusions have been tested for their ability to reduce the arrhythmias associated with occlusion of the left descending coronary artery in the anaesthetised dog. At 1 μg/kg/min both PGs reduced the incidence of premature ventricular contractions occurring during 25-min occlusions, while not reducing the incidence of ventricular fibrillation occurring on occlusion release. When infused for 5-min periods at 1 to 16 μg/kg/min, neither PGE₂ nor PGF_1α effectively reduced the frequency of ventricular arrhythmias occurring 24 hr after a permanent coronary occlusion.