G protein-coupled receptor kinase function is essential for chemosensation in C. elegans

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) mediate diverse signaling processes, including olfaction. G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) are important regulators of G protein signal transduction that specifically phosphorylate activated GPCRs to terminate signaling. Despite previously described roles for GRKs in GPCR signal downregulation, animals lacking C. elegans G protein-coupled receptor kinase-2 (Ce-grk-2) function are not hypersensitive to odorants. Instead, decreased Ce-grk-2 function in adult sensory neurons profoundly disrupts chemosensation, based on both behavioral analysis and Ca(2+) imaging. Although mammalian arrestin proteins cooperate with GRKs in receptor desensitization, loss of C. elegans arrestin-1 (arr-1) does not disrupt chemosensation. Either overexpression of the C. elegans Galpha subunit odr-3 or loss of eat-16, which encodes a regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) protein, restores chemosensation in Ce-grk-2 mutants. These results demonstrate that loss of GRK function can lead to reduced GPCR signal transduction and suggest an important role for RGS proteins in the regulation of chemosensation.     

Nonenzymatic rapid control of GIRK channel function by a G protein-coupled receptor kinase

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) respond to agonists to activate downstream enzymatic pathways or to gate ion channel function. Turning off GPCR signaling is known to involve phosphorylation of the GPCR by GPCR kinases (GRKs) to initiate their internalization. The process, however, is relatively slow and cannot account for the faster desensitization responses required to regulate channel gating. Here, we show that GRKs enable rapid desensitization of the G protein-coupled potassium channel (GIRK/Kir3.x) through a mechanism independent of their kinase activity. On GPCR activation, GRKs translocate to the membrane and quench channel activation by competitively binding and titrating G protein βγ subunits away from the channel. Of interest, the ability of GRKs to effect this rapid desensitization depends on the receptor type. The findings thus reveal a stimulus-specific, phosphorylation-independent mechanism for rapidly downregulating GPCR activity at the effector level.     

Involvement of the C-terminal proline-rich motif of G protein-coupled receptor kinases in recognition of activated rhodopsin

G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) are a family of serine/threonine kinases that phosphorylate many activated G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and play an important role in GPCR desensitization. Our previous work has demonstrated that the C-terminal conserved region (CC) of GRK-2 participates in interaction with rhodopsin and that this interaction is necessary for GRK-2-mediated receptor phosphorylation (Gan, X. Q., Wang, J. Y., Yang, Q. H., Li, Z., Liu, F., Pei, G., and Li, L. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 8469-8474). In this report, we further investigated whether the CC of other GRKs had the same functions and defined the specific sequences in CC that are required for the functions. The CC regions of GRK-1, GRK-2, and GRK-5, representatives of the three subfamilies of GRKs, could bind rhodopsin in vitro and inhibit GRK-2-mediated phosphorylation of rhodopsin, but not a peptide GRK substrate. Through a series of mutagenesis analyses, a proline-rich motif in the CC was identified as the key element involved in the interaction between the CC region and rhodopsin. Point mutations of this motif not only disrupted the interaction of GRK-2 with rhodopsin but also abolished the ability of GRK-2 to phosphorylate rhodopsin. The findings that the CC region of GRKs interact only with the light-activated but not the non-activated rhodopsin and that the N-terminal domain of GRK-2 interacts with rhodopsin in a light-independent manner suggest that the CC region is responsible for the recognition of activated GPCRs in the canonical model.     

G protein-coupled receptors stimulation and the control of cell migration

Cell migration is a fundamental biological process involved in normal physiology. Altered motile phenotypes are however often associated with the development and progression of diseases such as cancer and atherosclerosis. Remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton is required for cell shape changes and is controlled by a broad variety of cellular proteins. Interestingly, several extracellular stimuli can promote actin reorganization and result in enhanced cell migration. Namely, G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), which are activated by factors ranging from small amines, to hormones, and chemokines, initiate signalling cascades resulting in cell shape changes, formation of a migrating front (leading edge) and altered adhesion. GPCRs are heptahelical membrane proteins, which classically transmit signal via the activation of heterotrimeric G proteins. Sustained stimulation leads to the activation of G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) and the recruitment of arrestin proteins, which engage alternative signalling pathways. In this review, we will discuss the role of GPCR mediated signal transduction and review their importance in the regulation of actin remodeling leading to cell migration.     

Distinct clathrin-coated pits sort different G protein-coupled receptor cargo

Upon activation, many G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) internalize by clathrin-mediated endocytosis and are subsequently sorted to undergo recycling or lysosomal degradation. Here we observe that sorting can take place much earlier than previously thought, by entry of different GPCRs into distinct populations of clathrin-coated pit (CCP). These distinct populations were revealed by analysis of two purinergic GPCRs, P2Y(1) and P2Y(12), which enter two populations of CCPs in a mutually exclusive manner. The mechanisms underlying early GPCR sorting involve differential kinase-dependent processes because internalization of P2Y(12) is mediated by GPCR kinases (GRKs) and arrestin, whereas P2Y(1) internalization is GRK- and arrestin-independent but requires protein kinase C. Importantly, the beta(2) adrenoceptor which also internalizes in a GRK-dependent manner also traffics exclusively to P2Y(12)-containing CCPs. Our data therefore reveal distinct populations of CCPs that sort GPCR cargo at the plasma membrane using different kinase-dependent mechanisms.     

When a G protein-coupled receptor does not couple to a G protein

Classically, G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) relay signals by directly activating heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins). Increasing evidence indicates that GPCRs may also signal through G protein-independent pathways. JAK/STATs, Src-family tyrosine kinases, GRKs/beta-arrestins, and PDZ domain-containing proteins have been suggested to directly relay signals from GPCRs independent of G proteins. In addition, our laboratory recently reported that the beta(2) adrenergic receptor (beta(2)AR) could switch from G protein-coupled to G protein-independent ERK (extracellular signal-regulated kinase) activation in an agonist dosage-dependent manner. This finding provides a novel mechanism for G protein-independent GPCR signaling. This review focuses on recent progress in understanding the mechanisms by which G protein-independent GPCR signaling occurs.     

Multiple functions of G protein-coupled receptor kinases

Desensitization is a physiological feedback mechanism that blocks detrimental effects of persistent stimulation. G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2) was originally identified as the kinase that mediates G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) desensitization. Subsequent studies revealed that GRK is a family composed of seven isoforms (GRK1–GRK7). Each GRK shows a differential expression pattern. GRK1, GRK4, and GRK7 are expressed in limited tissues. In contrast, GRK2, GRK3, GRK5, and GRK6 are ubiquitously expressed throughout the body. The roles of GRKs in GPCR desensitization are well established. When GPCRs are activated by their agonists, GRKs phosphorylate serine/threonine residues in the intracellular loops and the carboxyl-termini of GPCRs. Phosphorylation promotes translocation of β-arrestins to the receptors and inhibits further G protein activation by interrupting receptor-G protein coupling. The binding of β-arrestins to the receptors also helps to promote receptor internalization by clathrin-coated pits. Thus, the GRK-catalyzed phosphorylation and subsequent binding of β-arrestin to GPCRs are believed to be the common mechanism of GPCR desensitization and internalization. Recent studies have revealed that GRKs are also involved in the β-arrestin-mediated signaling pathway. The GRK-mediated phosphorylation of the receptors plays opposite roles in conventional G protein- and β-arrestin-mediated signaling. The GRK-catalyzed phosphorylation of the receptors results in decreased G protein-mediated signaling, but it is necessary for β-arrestin-mediated signaling. Agonists that selectively activate GRK/β-arrestin-dependent signaling without affecting G protein signaling are known as β-arrestin-biased agonists. Biased agonists are expected to have potential therapeutic benefits for various diseases due to their selective activation of favorable physiological responses or avoidance of the side effects of drugs. Furthermore, GRKs are recognized as signaling mediators that are independent of either G protein- or β-arrestin-mediated pathways. GRKs can phosphorylate non-GPCR substrates, and this is found to be involved in various physiological responses, such as cell motility, development, and inflammation. In addition to these effects, our group revealed that GRK6 expressed in macrophages mediates the removal of apoptotic cells (engulfment) in a kinase activity-dependent manner. These studies revealed that GRKs block excess stimulus and also induce cellular responses. Here, we summarized the involvement of GRKs in β-arrestin-mediated and G protein-independent signaling pathways.     

Synucleins are a novel class of substrates for G protein-coupled receptor kinases

G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) specifically recognize and phosphorylate the agonist-occupied form of numerous G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), ultimately resulting in desensitization of receptor signaling. Until recently, GPCRs were considered to be the only natural substrates for GRKs. However, the recent discovery that GRKs also phosphorylate tubulin raised the possibility that additional GRK substrates exist and that the cellular role of GRKs may be much broader than just GPCR regulation. Here we report that synucleins are a novel class of GRK substrates. Synucleins (alpha, beta, gamma, and synoretin) are 14-kDa proteins that are highly expressed in brain but also found in numerous other tissues. alpha-Synuclein has been linked to the development of Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases. We found that all synucleins are GRK substrates, with GRK2 preferentially phosphorylating the alpha and beta isoforms, whereas GRK5 prefers alpha-synuclein as a substrate. GRK-mediated phosphorylation of synuclein is activated by factors that stimulate receptor phosphorylation, such as lipids (all GRKs) and Gbetagamma subunits (GRK2/3), suggesting that GPCR activation may regulate synuclein phosphorylation. GRKs phosphorylate synucleins at a single serine residue within the C-terminal domain. Although the function of synucleins remains largely unknown, recent studies have demonstrated that these proteins can interact with phospholipids and are potent inhibitors of phospholipase D2 (PLD2) in vitro. PLD2 regulates the breakdown of phosphatidylcholine and has been implicated in vesicular trafficking. We found that GRK-mediated phosphorylation inhibits synuclein's interaction with both phospholipids and PLD2. These findings suggest that GPCRs may be able to indirectly stimulate PLD2 activity via their ability to regulate GRK-promoted phosphorylation of synuclein.     

Bimodal regulation of the human H1 histamine receptor by G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2

The H1 histamine receptor (H1HR) is a member of the G protein-coupled receptor superfamily and regulates numerous cellular functions through its activation of the G(q/11) subfamily of heterotrimeric G proteins. Although the H1HR has been shown to undergo desensitization in multiple cell types, the mechanisms underlying the regulation of H1HR signaling are poorly defined. To address this issue, we examined the effects of wild type and mutant G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) on the phosphorylation and signaling of human H1HR in HEK293 cells. Overexpression of GRK2 promoted H1HR phosphorylation in intact HEK293 cells and completely inhibited inositol phosphate production stimulated by H1HR, whereas GRK5 and GRK6 had lesser effects on H1HR phosphorylation and signaling. Interestingly, catalytically inactive GRK2 (GRK2-K220R) also significantly attenuated H1HR-mediated inositol phosphate production, as did an N-terminal fragment of GRK2 previously characterized as a regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) protein for Galpha(q/11). Disruption of this RGS function in holo-GRK2 by mutation (GRK2-D110A) partially reversed the quenching effect of GRK2, whereas deletion of both the kinase activity and RGS function (GRK2-D110A/K220R) effectively relieved the inhibition of inositol phosphate generation. To evaluate the role of endogenous GRKs on H1HR regulation, we used small interfering RNAs to selectively target GRK2 and GRK5, two of the primary GRKs expressed in HEK293 cells. A GRK2-specific small interfering RNA effectively reduced GRK2 expression and resulted in a significant increase in histamine-promoted calcium flux. In contrast, knockdown of GRK5 expression was without effect on H1HR signaling. These findings demonstrate that GRK2 is the principal kinase mediating H1 histamine receptor desensitization in HEK293 cells and suggest that rapid termination of H1HR signaling is mediated by both the kinase activity and RGS function of GRK2.     

Selective regulation of endogenous G protein-coupled receptors by arrestins in HEK293 cells

Arrestins play an important role in regulating desensitization and trafficking of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). However, limited insight into the specificity of arrestin-mediated regulation of GPCRs is currently available. Recently, we used an antisense strategy to reduce arrestin levels in HEK293 cells and characterize the role of arrestins on endogenous G(s)-coupled receptors (Mundell, S. J., Loudon, R. B., and Benovic, J. L. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 8723-8732). Here, we characterized GPCRs coupled to either G(q) (M(1) muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (M(1)AchR) and P2y(1) and P2y(2) purinergic receptors) or G(i) (somatostatin and AT1 angiotensin receptors) in wild type and arrestin antisense HEK293 cells. The agonist-specific desensitization of the M(1)Ach and somatostatin receptors was significantly attenuated in antisense-expressing cells, whereas desensitization of P2y(1) and P2y(2) purinergic and AT1 angiotensin receptors was unaffected by reduced arrestin levels. To further examine arrestin/GPCR specificity, we studied the effects of endogenous GPCR activation on the redistribution of arrestin-2 epitope tagged with the green fluorescent protein (arrestin-2-GFP). These studies revealed a receptor-specific movement of arrestin-2-GFP that mirrored the arrestin-receptor specificity observed in the antisense cells. Thus, agonist-induced activation of endogenous beta(2)-adrenergic, prostaglandin E(2), M(1)Ach, and somatostatin receptors induced arrestin-2-GFP redistribution to early endosomes, whereas P2y(1) and P2y(2) purinergic and AT1 angiotensin receptor activation did not. Thus, endogenous arrestins mediate the regulation of selective G(q)- and G(i)-coupled receptors in HEK293 cells.     

Activation of G protein-coupled receptor kinase 1 involves interactions between its N-terminal region and its kinase domain

G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) phosphorylate activated G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to initiate receptor desensitization. In addition to the canonical phosphoacceptor site of the kinase domain, activated receptors bind to a distinct docking site that confers higher affinity and activates GRKs allosterically. Recent mutagenesis and structural studies support a model in which receptor docking activates a GRK by stabilizing the interaction of its ～20-amino acid N-terminal region with the kinase domain. This interaction in turn stabilizes a closed, more active conformation of the enzyme. To investigate the importance of this interaction for the process of GRK activation, we first validated the functionality of the N-terminal region in rhodopsin kinase (GRK1) by site-directed mutagenesis and then introduced a disulfide bond to cross-link the N-terminal region of GRK1 with its specific binding site on the kinase domain. Characterization of the kinetic and biophysical properties of the cross-linked protein showed that disulfide bond formation greatly enhances the catalytic efficiency of the peptide phosphorylation, but receptor-dependent phosphorylation, Meta II stabilization, and inhibition of transducin activation were unaffected. These data indicate that the interaction of the N-terminal region with the kinase domain is important for GRK activation but does not dictate the affinity of GRKs for activated receptors.     

ARF6: a newly appreciated player in G protein-coupled receptor desensitization

The luteinizing hormone/choriogonadotropin hormone receptor (LH/CG R) signals to regulate ovulation, corpus luteum formation, and fetal survival during pregnancy. Agonist binding to the LH/CG R is poorly reversible, emphasizing the importance of a cellular mechanism to temper signaling by a potentially persistently active receptor. Like other G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), signaling by this receptor is modulated by its binding of an arrestin. We have identified ADP ribosylation factor 6 (ARF6) as a protein whose activation state is regulated by the LH/CG R and which functions to regulate the availability of plasma membrane-docked arrestin 2 to this receptor. We hypothesize that ARF6 might also serve GPCRs other than the LH/CG R to regulate the availability of arrestin 2 for receptor desensitization.     

G protein-coupled receptor kinase 5 phosphorylation of hip regulates internalization of the chemokine receptor CXCR4

Regulation of the magnitude, duration, and localization of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling responses is controlled by desensitization, internalization, and downregulation of the activated receptor. Desensitization is initiated by the phosphorylation of the activated receptor by GPCR kinases (GRKs) and the binding of the adaptor protein arrestin. In addition to phosphorylating activated GPCRs, GRKs have been shown to phosphorylate a variety of additional substrates. An in vitro screen for novel GRK substrates revealed Hsp70 interacting protein (Hip) as a substrate. GRK5, but not GRK2, bound to and stoichiometrically phosphorylated Hip in vitro. The primary binding domain of GRK5 was mapped to residues 303-319 on Hip, while the major site of phosphorylation was identified to be Ser-346. GRK5 also bound to and phosphorylated Hip on Ser-346 in cells. While Hip was previously implicated in chemokine receptor trafficking, we found that the phosphorylation of Ser-346 was required for proper agonist-induced internalization of the chemokine receptor CXCR4. Taken together, Hip has been identified as a novel substrate of GRK5 in vitro and in cells, and phosphorylation of Hip by GRK5 plays a role in modulating CXCR4 internalization.     

The origin and evolution of G protein-coupled receptor kinases

G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) kinases (GRKs) play key role in homologous desensitization of GPCRs. GRKs phosphorylate activated receptors, promoting high affinity binding of arrestins, which precludes G protein coupling. Direct binding to active GPCRs activates GRKs, so that they selectively phosphorylate only the activated form of the receptor regardless of the accessibility of the substrate peptides within it and their Ser/Thr-containing sequence. Mammalian GRKs were classified into three main lineages, but earlier GRK evolution has not been studied. Here we show that GRKs emerged at the early stages of eukaryotic evolution via an insertion of a kinase similar to ribosomal protein S6 kinase into a loop in RGS domain. GRKs in Metazoa fall into two clades, one including GRK2 and GRK3, and the other consisting of all remaining GRKs, split into GRK1-GRK7 lineage and GRK4-GRK5-GRK6 lineage in vertebrates. One representative of each of the two ancient clades is found as early as placozoan Trichoplax adhaerens. Several protists, two oomycetes and unicellular brown algae have one GRK-like protein, suggesting that the insertion of a kinase domain into the RGS domain preceded the origin of Metazoa. The two GRK families acquired distinct structural units in the N- and C-termini responsible for membrane recruitment and receptor association. Thus, GRKs apparently emerged before animals and rapidly expanded in true Metazoa, most likely due to the need for rapid signalling adjustments in fast-moving animals.     

Phosphorylation-independent regulation of metabotropic glutamate receptor signaling by G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2

The accepted paradigm for G protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK)-mediated desensitization of G protein-coupled receptors involves GRK-mediated receptor phosphorylation followed by the binding of arrestin proteins. Although GRKs contribute to metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 (mGluR1) inactivation, beta-arrestins do not appear to be required for mGluR1 G protein uncoupling. Therefore, we investigated whether the phosphorylation of serine and threonine residues localized within the C terminus of mGluR1a is sufficient to allow GRK2-mediated attenuation of mGluR1a signaling. We find that the truncation of the mGluR1a C-terminal tail prevents mGluR1a phosphorylation and that GRK2 does not contribute to the phosphorylation of an mGluR1 splice variant (mGluR1b). However, mGluR1a-866Delta- and mGluR1b-stimulated inositol phosphate formation is attenuated following GRK2 expression. The expression of the GRK2 C-terminal domain to block membrane translocation of endogenous GRK2 increases mGluR1a-866Delta- and mGluR1b-stimulated inositol phosphate formation, presumably by blocking membrane translocation of GRK2. In contrast, expression of the kinase-deficient GRK2-K220R mutant inhibits inositol phosphate formation by these unphosphorylated receptors. Expression of the GRK2 N-terminal domain (residues 45-185) also attenuates both constitutive and agonist-stimulated mGluR1a, mGluR1a-866Delta, and mGluR1b signaling, and the GRK2 N terminus co-precipitates with mGluR1a. Taken together, our observations indicate that attenuation of mGluR1 signaling by GRK2 is phosphorylation-independent and that the interaction of the N-terminal domain of GRK2 with mGluR1 contributes to the regulation of mGluR1 G protein coupling.     

Novel roles for arrestins in the post-endocytic trafficking of G protein-coupled receptors

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent the largest family of transmembrane signaling molecules in the human genome. As such, they interact with numerous intracellular molecules, which can act either to propagate or curtail signaling from the receptor. Their primary mode of cellular activation occurs through heterotrimeric G proteins, which in turn can activate a wide spectrum of effector molecules, including phosphodiesterases, phospholipases, adenylyl cyclases and ion channels. Active GPCRs are also the target of G protein-coupled receptor kinases, which phosphorylate the receptors culminating in the binding of the protein arrestin. This results in rapid desensitization through inhibition of G protein binding, as well as novel mechanisms of cellular activation that involve the scaffolding of cellular kinases to GPCR-arrestin complexes. Arrestins can also serve to mediate the internalization of certain GPCRs, a process which plays an important role in regulating cellular activity both by mediating long-term desensitization through down regulation (degradation) of receptors and by recycling desensitized receptors back to the cell surface to initiate additional rounds of signaling. The mechanisms that regulate the subsequent intracellular trafficking of GPCRs following internalization are largely unknown. Recently however, it has become clear that the pattern of receptor phosphorylation and subsequent binding of arrestin play a critical role in the intracellular trafficking of internalized receptors, thereby dictating the ultimate fate of the receptor. In addition, arrestins have now been shown to be required for the recycling of GPCRs that are capable of internalizing through arrestin-independent mechanisms. This review will summarize recent advances in our understanding of the roles of arrestins in post-endocytic GPCR trafficking.     

G protein-coupled receptor kinases: Past,present and future

This review is provided in recognition of the extensive contributions of Dr. Robert J. Lefkowitz to the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) field and to celebrate his 75th birthday. Since one of the authors trained with Bob in the 80s, we provide a history of work done in the Lefkowitz lab during the 80s that focused on dissecting the mechanisms that regulate GPCR signaling, with a particular emphasis on the GPCR kinases (GRKs). In addition, we highlight structure/function characteristics of GRK interaction with GPCRs as well as a review of two recent reports that provide a molecular model for GRK-GPCR interaction. Finally, we offer our perspective on some future studies that we believe will drive this field.     

Heterologous inhibition of G protein-coupled receptor endocytosis mediated by receptor-specific trafficking of beta-arrestins

We have observed an unexpected type of nonreciprocal "cross-regulation" of the agonist-induced endocytosis of G protein-coupled receptors by clathrin-coated pits. Isoproterenol-dependent internalization of beta2-adrenergic receptors in stably transfected HEK293 cells was specifically blocked (>65% inhibition) by vasopressin-induced activation of V2 vasopressin receptors co-expressed at similar levels. In contrast, activation of beta2 receptors caused no detectable effect on V2 receptor internalization in the same cells. Several pieces of evidence suggest that this nonreciprocal inhibition of endocytosis is mediated by receptor-specific intracellular trafficking of beta-arrestins. First, previous studies showed that the activation of V2 but not beta2 receptors caused pronounced recruitment of beta-arrestins to endocytic membranes (Oakley, R. H., Laporte, S. A., Holt, J. A., Barak, L. S., and Caron, M. G. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 32248-32257). Second, overexpression of arrestin 2 or 3 (beta-arrestin 1 or 2) abolished the V2 receptor-mediated inhibition of beta2 receptor internalization. Third, mutations of the V2 receptor that block endomembrane recruitment of beta-arrestins eliminated the V2 receptor-dependent blockade of beta2 receptor internalization. These results identify a novel type of heterologous regulation of G protein-coupled receptors, define a new functional role of receptor-specific intracellular trafficking of beta-arrestins, and suggest an experimental method to rapidly modulate the functional activity of beta-arrestins in intact cells.     

Clathrin-dependent mechanisms of G protein-coupled receptor endocytosis

The heptahelical G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family includes approximately 900 members and is the largest family of signaling receptors encoded in the mammalian genome. G protein-coupled receptors elicit cellular responses to diverse extracellular stimuli at the plasma membrane and some internalized receptors continue to signal from intracellular compartments. In addition to rapid desensitization, receptor trafficking is critical for regulation of the temporal and spatial aspects of GPCR signaling. Indeed, GPCR internalization functions to control signal termination and propagation as well as receptor resensitization. Our knowledge of the mechanisms that regulate mammalian GPCR endocytosis is based predominantly on arrestin regulation of receptors through a clathrin- and dynamin-dependent pathway. However, multiple clathrin adaptors, which recognize distinct endocytic signals, are now known to function in clathrin-mediated endocytosis of diverse cargo. Given the vast number and diversity of GPCRs, the complexity of clathrin-mediated endocytosis and the discovery of multiple clathrin adaptors, a single universal mechanism controlling endocytosis of all mammalian GPCRs is unlikely. Indeed, several recent studies now suggest that endocytosis of different GPCRs is regulated by distinct mechanisms and clathrin adaptors. In this review, we discuss the diverse mechanisms that regulate clathrin-dependent GPCR endocytosis.     

Adjuvant arthritis induces down-regulation of G protein-coupled receptor kinases in the immune system

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) play a crucial role in the regulation of the immune response by, e.g., chemokines, PGs, and beta(2)-adrenergic agonists. The responsiveness of these GPCRs is turned off by the family of G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRK1-6). These kinases act by phosphorylating the GPCR in an agonist-dependent manner, resulting in homologous desensitization of the receptor. Although GRKs are widely expressed throughout the body, leukocytes express relatively high levels of GRKs, in particular GRK2, -3, and -6. We investigated whether in vivo the inflammatory disease adjuvant arthritis (AA) induces changes in GRK expression and function in the immune system. In addition, we analyzed whether the systemic effects of AA also involve changes in GRKs in nonimmune organs. At the peak of the inflammatory process, we observed a profound down-regulation of GRK2, -3, and -6 in splenocytes and mesenteric lymph node cells from AA rats. Interestingly, no changes in GRK were observed in thymocytes and in nonimmune organs such as heart and pituitary. During the remission phase of AA, GRK levels in spleen and mesenteric lymph nodes are returning to baseline levels. The decrease in GRK2 at the peak of AA is restricted to CD45RA(+) B cells and CD4(+) T cells, and was not observed in CD8(+) T cells. In conclusion, we demonstrate in this study, for the first time, that an inflammatory process in vivo induces a tissue-specific down-regulation of GRKs in the immune system.