THE EVOLUTION OF SPERM SIZE IN BIRDS

Sperm size varies enormously among species, but the reasons for this variation remain obscure. Since it has been suggested that swimming velocity increases with sperm length, earlier studies proposed longer (and therefore faster) sperm are advantageous under conditions of intense sperm competition. Nonetheless, previous work has been equivocal, perhaps because the intensity of sperm competition was measured indirectly. DNA profiling now provides a more direct measure of the number of offspring sired by extrapair males, and thus a more direct method of assessing the potential for sperm competition. Using a sample of 21 species of passerine birds for which DNA profiling data were available, we found a positive relation between sperm length and the degree of extrapair paternity. A path analysis, however, revealed that this relationship arises only indirectly through the positive relationship between the rate of extrapair paternity and length of sperm storage tubules (SSTs) in the female. As sperm length is correlated positively with SST length, an increase in the intensity of sperm competition leads to an increase in sperm length only through its effect on SST length. Why females vary SST length with the intensity of sperm competition is not clear, but one possibility is that it increases female control over how sperm are used in fertilization. Males, in turn, may respond on an evolutionary time scale to changes in SST size by increasing sperm length to prevent displacement from rival sperm. Previous theoretical analyses predicting that sperm size should decrease as sperm competition becomes more intense were not supported by our findings. We suggest that future models of sperm-size evolution consider not only the role of sperm competition, but also how female control and manipulation of ejaculates after insemination selects for different sperm morphologies.     

PHYSIOLOGY OF THE THYROID GLAND IN BIRDS: A REVIEW.

A brief introductory account of the structure of the thyroid gland and the general effects of its hormone are given.
There is sufficient experimental evidence to warrant the conclusion that in birds, as in other vertebrates, the level of thyroid function is regulated by a hormone of the anterior lobe of the pituitary gland, the thyrotrophic hormone.
Increased thyroid activity during the cooler period of the year is found in a number of species, and this is probably widespread.
For all species so far tested, feathers grown during thyroid deficiency show abnormally loose texture and become elongated and narrow. Reverse changes can be produced by thyroid administration to normal birds.
The relationship between the thyroid and migratory behaviour, though probable, needs further investigation.
Feather pigmentation is in some species unaffected by the thyroid, but is increased in others.
There is undoubtedly a relationship between the moult and increased thyroid activity since a phase of high thyroid function preceding the moult is of widespread occurrence. In some gallinaceous birds the moult can be precipitated by thyroid administration, but not in ducks. In some species complete suppression of the moult has been claimed if thyroidectomy is performed sufficiently far ahead of the next moult due. Complete dependence of moulting on a raised output of thyroid hormone has, however, not yet been proved for any species.
So far there is experimental evidence, which requires comfirmation, from one species only that return of the gonad to the resting condition following the breeding-season recrudescence is to a considerable extent dependent on the thyroid.
In Domestic Fowls thyroid hormone affects the spur.     

哺乳动物似昼夜节律研究概要

本文参阅了50年代以来有关昼夜节律研究的重要著作,并根据近年来国内外发表的节律研究论文综合整理写成。     

中国鸟类的DNA分类及系统发育研究概述

鸟类分类是鸟类学其他研究领域的基础,近年来分子技术的发展,以及计算机技术的应用为鸟类分类学和鸟类系统演化研究提供了新的研究手段,给传统的系统分类研究带来了新的机遇.Tautz等于2002年首先提出运用DNA序列作为生物分类系统的主要平台,即DNA分类学(DNA Taxonomy).而Hebert等于2003年则首次提出了DNA条形码(DNA Barcoding)的概念,并对其物种分类和鉴定意义予以肯定,建议利用线粒体细胞色素C氧化酶亚单位Ⅰ(COI)的特定区段来做DNA条形编码的基础.在鸟类DNA分类方面,国内学者应用线粒体基因Cut b,COI,c-mos,c-myc,12s rRNA,16s rRNA,ND2,ND3,CR,RAG-1以及核基因myoglobin introⅡ等不同片段对很多类群进行了分类探讨和系统发育研究.但是主要集中在鸡形目及雀形目鸟类.中国是鸟类多样性极其丰富的国家,近年来很多亚种、种及以上分类阶元依然存在问题,因此,中国鸟类物种的分类地位、系统发育与演化关系等依然有很多问题等待深入研究.目前国内基于COI的鸟类分类及系统发育研究有了一些报道,但是真正的DNA条形码工作尚需继续、深入地开展.     

OLFACTORY-BULB SIZE AND NOCTURNALITY IN BIRDS

Recent evidence shows that, despite earlier beliefs, many birds have a functional sense of smell. There is also considerable variation in olfactory-bulb size among bird species, yet the evolutionary significance of this variation has remained elusive. We argue that birds living under low-light conditions, where vision is less efficient, should have evolved or maintained an increased olfactory ability and, hence, larger olfactory bulbs. Using a family-level comparative analysis to control at least partially for taxonomic artifacts, we show that none of a series of ecological variables (diet, nest type, development, nest dispersion, and migratory behavior) accounts for variation in olfactory-bulb size once the effects of body size and brain size (measured by cerebral-hemisphere length) have been controlled. Activity timing, however, accounts for significant variation even after the removal of these other variables. We discovered 13 independent cases in which nocturnal or crepuscular lineages have evolved a diurnal habit, or vice versa, and compared relative olfactory-bulb sizes between each branch pair. In all but one case, nocturnal or crepuscular birds have larger olfactory bulbs than their diurnal counterparts. We therefore demonstrate a widespread relationship between ecology and the evolutionary development of a part of the brain.     

THE EVOLUTION OF REVERSED SEXUAL DIMORPHISM IN SIZE IN MONOGAMOUS SPECIES OF BIRDS

Reversed sexual dimorphism in size (RSD) occurs in most species of several taxonomic groups of birds. The hypotheses proposed to explain this phenomenon are examined theoretically, using inequalities to state selection in the most rigorous possible terms. The most pertinent empirical evidence is also examined critically. Proponents of hypotheses on the evolution of RSD have failed to consider the genetic constraints on the evolution of dimorphism. Selection for dimorphism can act on only that small portion of the genetic determination of body size that is sex limited. In general, selection for body size is much more likely to lead to a similar change (e.g. larger) in both sexes than to dimorphism. The most popular hypotheses involve selection for size-related differences in foraging ability. It is unlikely that there is variation in size-related foraging differences available for selection in a monomorphic, ancestral population. Foraging differences between the sexes cannot lead to the evolution of RSD; evolution of large and small morphs of both sexes is a more likely outcome. Selection for sex-role differentiation factors (e.g. large females lay larger eggs, small males are more agile in flight) can lead to the evolution of RSD, but only if the magnitudes of opposing selection for small males and for large females are equal. Combining selection for size-related foraging differences with selection for sex-role differentiation factors hinders the evolution of RSD until the sexes differ in size by 3 s.d . Empirical evidence supports this assertion: statistically significant differences between the sexes in the size of prey taken are found only in highly dimorphic species. The sex-role differentiation factors that have been proposed appear unlikely to provide the equal selection necessary for the evolution of RSD. Several authors have proposed that small size in males is selected for foraging ability and large size in females for some sex-role differentiation factor. Males cannot be more efficient foragers without females being less efficient and efficiency cannot be a factor only when the male is feeding his family. RSD cannot evolve in monogamous species if large females survive less well than small males. RSD might evolve as the result of sexual selection for small size in males and constraints on the reduction of size in females because of some factor associated with reproduction. Examination of seven studies indicating a relationship between female size and reproductive success shows very little unequivocal evidence for small size in females allowing breeding earlier in the season. Large size in females allows females to breed at a younger age in the sparrowhawk and pairs to form more rapidly in three species of sandpipers. Both of these may be the result of sexual selection. There are fewer theoretical problems with sexual selection as a cause for the evolution of RSD than with the other hypotheses. Empirical evidence for sexual selection is scarce but better than that for the other hypotheses. Evidence is contradictory for the selection of small size in males for agility in aerial displays for courtship or defence of territory. Large size in females does not appear to be the result of selection for competitive ability to obtain mates. Facilitation of female dominance and hence of the formation and maintenance of a pair bond is the most viable explanation of the evolution of RSD. It is most likely that all dimorphism (normal or reversed) is the result of sexual selection. RSD is correlated with birds in the diet in the Falconiformes and this is a central theme in the foraging hypotheses. This correlation may be because birds are abundant and available in a continuum of sizes, thus permitting but not causing the evolution of RSD or because species that prey upon birds are better equipped physically (and perhaps more likely behaviourally) to inflict damaging attacks on conspecifics and the greater RSD increases female dominance and the ease of pair formation.     

POTENTIAL MECHANISMS FOR SEX RATIO ADJUSTMENT IN MAMMALS AND BIRDS

Sex ratio skews in relation to a variety of environmental or parental conditions have frequently been reported among mammals and, though less commonly, among birds. However, the adaptive significance of such sex ratio variation remains unclear. This has, in part, been attributed to the absence of a low-cost physiological mechanism for sex ratio manipulation by the parent. It is shown here that several recent findings in reproductive biology are suggestive of many potential pathways by which gonadotropins and steroid hormones could interfere with the sex ratio at birth. And these hormone levels are well-known to be influenced by many parameters which have been invoked in correlating with offspring sex ratios. Hence, it is argued that the significant, but inconsistent sex ratio biases reported in mammalian and avian populations are coherent with current knowledge on reproductive physiology in those species. However, whether such variations can be viewed at as a consequence of physiological constraint or as adaptive sex ratio adjustment, has still to be determined.