Intersectin Regulates Dendritic Spine Development and Somatodendritic Endocytosis but Not Synaptic Vesicle Recycling in Hippocampal Neurons

Intersectin-short (intersectin-s) is a multimodule scaffolding protein functioning in constitutive and regulated forms of endocytosis in non-neuronal cells and in synaptic vesicle (SV) recycling at the neuromuscular junction of Drosophila and Caenorhabditis elegans. In vertebrates, alternative splicing generates a second isoform, intersectin-long (intersectin-l), that contains additional modular domains providing a guanine nucleotide exchange factor activity for Cdc42. In mammals, intersectin-s is expressed in multiple tissues and cells, including glia, but excluded from neurons, whereas intersectin-l is a neuron-specific isoform. Thus, intersectin-I may regulate multiple forms of endocytosis in mammalian neurons, including SV endocytosis. We now report, however, that intersectin-l is localized to somatodendritic regions of cultured hippocampal neurons, with some juxtanuclear accumulation, but is excluded from synaptophysin-labeled axon terminals. Consistently, intersectin-l knockdown (KD) does not affect SV recycling. Instead intersectin-l co-localizes with clathrin heavy chain and adaptor protein 2 in the somatodendritic region of neurons, and its KD reduces the rate of transferrin endocytosis. The protein also co-localizes with F-actin at dendritic spines, and intersectin-l KD disrupts spine maturation during development. Our data indicate that intersectin-l is indeed an important regulator of constitutive endocytosis and neuronal development but that it is not a prominent player in the regulated endocytosis of SVs.Clathrin-mediated endocytosis (CME)⁴ is a major mechanism by which cells take up nutrients, control the surface levels of multiple proteins, including ion channels and transporters, and regulate the coupling of signaling receptors to downstream signaling cascades (1-5). In neurons, CME takes on additional specialized roles; it is an important process regulating synaptic vesicle (SV) availability through endocytosis and recycling of SV membranes (6, 7), it shapes synaptic plasticity (8-10), and it is crucial in maintaining synaptic membranes and membrane structure (11).Numerous endocytic accessory proteins participate in CME, interacting with each other and with core components of the endocytic machinery such as clathrin heavy chain (CHC) and adaptor protein-2 (AP-2) through specific modules and peptide motifs (12). One such module is the Eps15 homology domain that binds to proteins bearing NPF motifs (13, 14). Another is the Src homology 3 (SH3) domain, which binds to proline-rich domains in protein partners (15). Intersectin is a multimodule scaffolding protein that interacts with a wide range of proteins, including several involved in CME (16). Intersectin has two N-terminal Eps15 homology domains that are responsible for binding to epsin, SCAMP1, and numb (17-19), a central coil-coiled domain that interacts with Eps15 and SNAP-23 and -25 (17, 20, 21), and five SH3 domains in its C-terminal region that interact with multiple proline-rich domain proteins, including synaptojanin, dynamin, N-WASP, CdGAP, and mSOS (16, 22-25). The rich binding capability of intersectin has linked it to various functions from CME (17, 26, 27) and signaling (22, 28, 29) to mitogenesis (30, 31) and regulation of the actin cytoskeleton (23).Intersectin functions in SV recycling at the neuromuscular junction of Drosophila and C. elegans where it acts as a scaffold, regulating the synaptic levels of endocytic accessory proteins (21, 32-34). In vertebrates, the intersectin gene is subject to alternative splicing, and a longer isoform (intersectin-l) is generated that is expressed exclusively in neurons (26, 28, 35, 36). This isoform has all the binding modules of its short (intersectin-s) counterpart but also has additional domains: a DH and a PH domain that provide guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) activity specific for Cdc42 (23, 37) and a C2 domain at the C terminus. Through its GEF activity and binding to actin regulatory proteins, including N-WASP, intersectin-l has been implicated in actin regulation and the development of dendritic spines (19, 23, 24). In addition, because the rest of the binding modules are shared between intersectin-s and -l, it is generally thought that the two intersectin isoforms have the same endocytic functions. In particular, given the well defined role for the invertebrate orthologs of intersectin-s in SV endocytosis, it is thought that intersectin-l performs this role in mammalian neurons, which lack intersectin-s. Defining the complement of intersectin functional activities in mammalian neurons is particularly relevant given that the protein is involved in the pathophysiology of Down syndrome (DS). Specifically, the intersectin gene is localized on chromosome 21q22.2 and is overexpressed in DS brains (38). Interestingly, alterations in endosomal pathways are a hallmark of DS neurons and neurons from the partial trisomy 16 mouse, Ts65Dn, a model for DS (39, 40). Thus, an endocytic trafficking defect may contribute to the DS disease process.Here, the functional roles of intersectin-l were studied in cultured hippocampal neurons. We find that intersectin-l is localized to the somatodendritic regions of neurons, where it co-localizes with CHC and AP-2 and regulates the uptake of transferrin. Intersectin-l also co-localizes with actin at dendritic spines and disrupting intersectin-l function alters dendritic spine development. In contrast, intersectin-l is absent from presynaptic terminals and has little or no role in SV recycling.     

Loss of PINK1 Function Promotes Mitophagy through Effects on Oxidative Stress and Mitochondrial Fission

Mitochondrial dysregulation is strongly implicated in Parkinson disease. Mutations in PTEN-induced kinase 1 (PINK1) are associated with familial parkinsonism and neuropsychiatric disorders. Although overexpressed PINK1 is neuroprotective, less is known about neuronal responses to loss of PINK1 function. We found that stable knockdown of PINK1 induced mitochondrial fragmentation and autophagy in SH-SY5Y cells, which was reversed by the reintroduction of an RNA interference (RNAi)-resistant plasmid for PINK1. Moreover, stable or transient overexpression of wild-type PINK1 increased mitochondrial interconnectivity and suppressed toxin-induced autophagy/mitophagy. Mitochondrial oxidant production played an essential role in triggering mitochondrial fragmentation and autophagy in PINK1 shRNA lines. Autophagy/mitophagy served a protective role in limiting cell death, and overexpressing Parkin further enhanced this protective mitophagic response. The dominant negative Drp1 mutant inhibited both fission and mitophagy in PINK1-deficient cells. Interestingly, RNAi knockdown of autophagy proteins Atg7 and LC3/Atg8 also decreased mitochondrial fragmentation without affecting oxidative stress, suggesting active involvement of autophagy in morphologic remodeling of mitochondria for clearance. To summarize, loss of PINK1 function elicits oxidative stress and mitochondrial turnover coordinated by the autophagic and fission/fusion machineries. Furthermore, PINK1 and Parkin may cooperate through different mechanisms to maintain mitochondrial homeostasis.Parkinson disease is an age-related neurodegenerative disease that affects ∼1% of the population worldwide. The causes of sporadic cases are unknown, although mitochondrial or oxidative toxins such as 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium, 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA),³ and rotenone reproduce features of the disease in animal and cell culture models (1). Abnormalities in mitochondrial respiration and increased oxidative stress are observed in cells and tissues from parkinsonian patients (2, 3), which also exhibit increased mitochondrial autophagy (4). Furthermore, mutations in parkinsonian genes affect oxidative stress response pathways and mitochondrial homeostasis (5). Thus, disruption of mitochondrial homeostasis represents a major factor implicated in the pathogenesis of sporadic and inherited parkinsonian disorders (PD).The PARK6 locus involved in autosomal recessive and early-onset PD encodes for PTEN-induced kinase 1 (PINK1) (6, 7). PINK1 is a cytosolic and mitochondrially localized 581-amino acid serine/threonine kinase that possesses an N-terminal mitochondrial targeting sequence (6, 8). The primary sequence also includes a putative transmembrane domain important for orientation of the PINK1 domain (8), a conserved kinase domain homologous to calcium calmodulin kinases, and a C-terminal domain that regulates autophosphorylation activity (9, 10). Overexpression of wild-type PINK1, but not its PD-associated mutants, protects against several toxic insults in neuronal cells (6, 11, 12). Mitochondrial targeting is necessary for some (13) but not all of the neuroprotective effects of PINK1 (14), implicating involvement of cytoplasmic targets that modulate mitochondrial pathobiology (8). PINK1 catalytic activity is necessary for its neuroprotective role, because a kinase-deficient K219M substitution in the ATP binding pocket of PINK1 abrogates its ability to protect neurons (14). Although PINK1 mutations do not seem to impair mitochondrial targeting, PD-associated mutations differentially destabilize the protein, resulting in loss of neuroprotective activities (13, 15).Recent studies indicate that PINK1 and Parkin interact genetically (3, 16-18) to prevent oxidative stress (19, 20) and regulate mitochondrial morphology (21). Primary cells derived from PINK1 mutant patients exhibit mitochondrial fragmentation with disorganized cristae, recapitulated by RNA interference studies in HeLa cells (3).Mitochondria are degraded by macroautophagy, a process involving sequestration of cytoplasmic cargo into membranous autophagic vacuoles (AVs) for delivery to lysosomes (22, 23). Interestingly, mitochondrial fission accompanies autophagic neurodegeneration elicited by the PD neurotoxin 6-OHDA (24, 25). Moreover, mitochondrial fragmentation and increased autophagy are observed in neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer and Parkinson diseases (4, 26-28). Although inclusion of mitochondria in autophagosomes was once believed to be a random process, as observed during starvation, studies involving hypoxia, mitochondrial damage, apoptotic stimuli, or limiting amounts of aerobic substrates in facultative anaerobes support the concept of selective mitochondrial autophagy (mitophagy) (29, 30). In particular, mitochondrially localized kinases may play an important role in models involving oxidative mitochondrial injury (25, 31, 32).Autophagy is involved in the clearance of protein aggregates (33-35) and normal regulation of axonal-synaptic morphology (36). Chronic disruption of lysosomal function results in accumulation of subtly impaired mitochondria with decreased calcium buffering capacity (37), implicating an important role for autophagy in mitochondrial homeostasis (37, 38). Recently, Parkin, which complements the effects of PINK1 deficiency on mitochondrial morphology (3), was found to promote autophagy of depolarized mitochondria (39). Conversely, Beclin 1-independent autophagy/mitophagy contributes to cell death elicited by the PD toxins 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium and 6-OHDA (25, 28, 31, 32), causing neurite retraction in cells expressing a PD-linked mutation in leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (40). Whereas properly regulated autophagy plays a homeostatic and neuroprotective role, excessive or incomplete autophagy creates a condition of “autophagic stress” that can contribute to neurodegeneration (28).As mitochondrial fragmentation (3) and increased mitochondrial autophagy (4) have been described in human cells or tissues of PD patients, we investigated whether or not the engineered loss of PINK1 function could recapitulate these observations in human neuronal cells (SH-SY5Y). Stable knockdown of endogenous PINK1 gave rise to mitochondrial fragmentation and increased autophagy and mitophagy, whereas stable or transient overexpression of PINK1 had the opposite effect. Autophagy/mitophagy was dependent upon increased mitochondrial oxidant production and activation of fission. The data indicate that PINK1 is important for the maintenance of mitochondrial networks, suggesting that coordinated regulation of mitochondrial dynamics and autophagy limits cell death associated with loss of PINK1 function.     

The Cytoskeletal Protein ��-Actinin Regulates Acid-sensing Ion Channel 1a through a C-terminal Interaction

The acid-sensing ion channel 1a (ASIC1a) is widely expressed in central and peripheral neurons where it generates transient cation currents when extracellular pH falls. ASIC1a confers pH-dependent modulation on postsynaptic dendritic spines and has critical effects in neurological diseases associated with a reduced pH. However, knowledge of the proteins that interact with ASIC1a and influence its function is limited. Here, we show that α-actinin, which links membrane proteins to the actin cytoskeleton, associates with ASIC1a in brain and in cultured cells. The interaction depended on an α-actinin-binding site in the ASIC1a C terminus that was specific for ASIC1a versus other ASICs and for α-actinin-1 and -4. Co-expressing α-actinin-4 altered ASIC1a current density, pH sensitivity, desensitization rate, and recovery from desensitization. Moreover, reducing α-actinin expression altered acid-activated currents in hippocampal neurons. These findings suggest that α-actinins may link ASIC1a to a macromolecular complex in the postsynaptic membrane where it regulates ASIC1a activity.Acid-sensing ion channels (ASICs)² are H⁺-gated members of the DEG/ENaC family (1–3). Members of this family contain cytosolic N and C termini, two transmembrane domains, and a large cysteine-rich extracellular domain. ASIC subunits combine as homo- or heterotrimers to form cation channels that are widely expressed in the central and peripheral nervous systems (1–4). In mammals, four genes encode ASICs, and two subunits, ASIC1 and ASIC2, have two splice forms, a and b. Central nervous system neurons express ASIC1a, ASIC2a, and ASIC2b (5–7). Homomeric ASIC1a channels are activated when extracellular pH drops below 7.2, and half-maximal activation occurs at pH 6.5–6.8 (8–10). These channels desensitize in the continued presence of a low extracellular pH, and they can conduct Ca²⁺ (9, 11–13). ASIC1a is required for acid-evoked currents in central nervous system neurons; disrupting the gene encoding ASIC1a eliminates H⁺-gated currents unless extracellular pH is reduced below pH 5.0 (5, 7).Previous studies found ASIC1a enriched in synaptosomal membrane fractions and present in dendritic spines, the site of excitatory synapses (5, 14, 15). Consistent with this localization, ASIC1a null mice manifested deficits in hippocampal long term potentiation, learning, and memory, which suggested that ASIC1a is required for normal synaptic plasticity (5, 16). ASICs might be activated during neurotransmission when synaptic vesicles empty their acidic contents into the synaptic cleft or when neuronal activity lowers extracellular pH (17–19). Ion channels, including those at the synapse often interact with multiple proteins in a macromolecular complex that incorporates regulators of their function (20, 21). For ASIC1a, only a few interacting proteins have been identified. Earlier work indicated that ASIC1a interacts with another postsynaptic scaffolding protein, PICK1 (15, 22, 23). ASIC1a also has been reported to interact with annexin II light chain p11 through its cytosolic N terminus to increase cell surface expression (24) and with Ca²⁺/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II to phosphorylate the channel (25). However, whether ASIC1a interacts with additional proteins and with the cytoskeleton remain unknown. Moreover, it is not known whether such interactions alter ASIC1a function.In analyzing the ASIC1a amino acid sequence, we identified cytosolic residues that might bind α-actinins. α-Actinins cluster membrane proteins and signaling molecules into macromolecular complexes and link membrane proteins to the actincytoskeleton (for review, Ref. 26). Four genes encode α-actinin-1, -2, -3, and -4 isoforms. α-Actinins contain an N-terminal head domain that binds F-actin, a C-terminal region containing two EF-hand motifs, and a central rod domain containing four spectrin-like motifs (26–28). The C-terminal portion of the rod segment appears to be crucial for binding to membrane proteins. The α-actinins assemble into antiparallel homodimers through interactions in their rod domain. α-Actinins-1, -2, and -4 are enriched in dendritic spines, concentrating at the postsynaptic membrane (29–35). In the postsynaptic membrane of excitatory synapses, α-actinin connects the NMDA receptor to the actin cytoskeleton, and this interaction is key for Ca²⁺-dependent inhibition of NMDA receptors (36–38). α-Actinins can also regulate the membrane trafficking and function of several cation channels, including L-type Ca²⁺ channels, K⁺ channels, and TRP channels (39–41).To better understand the function of ASIC1a channels in macromolecular complexes, we asked if ASIC1a associates with α-actinins. We were interested in the α-actinins because they and ASIC1a, both, are present in dendritic spines, ASIC1a contains a potential α-actinin binding sequence, and the related epithelial Na⁺ channel (ENaC) interacts with the cytoskeleton (42, 43). Therefore, we hypothesized that α-actinin interacts structurally and functionally with ASIC1a.     

Mechanism of Sustained Activation of Ribosomal S6 Kinase (RSK) and ERK by Kaposi Sarcoma-associated Herpesvirus ORF45: MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEXES RETAIN ACTIVE PHOSPHORYLATED ERK AND RSK AND PROTECT THEM FROM DEPHOSPHORYLATION*

As obligate intracellular parasites, viruses exploit diverse cellular signaling machineries, including the mitogen-activated protein-kinase pathway, during their infections. We have demonstrated previously that the open reading frame 45 (ORF45) of Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus interacts with p90 ribosomal S6 kinases (RSKs) and strongly stimulates their kinase activities (Kuang, E., Tang, Q., Maul, G. G., and Zhu, F. (2008) J. Virol. 82 ,1838 -1850). Here, we define the mechanism by which ORF45 activates RSKs. We demonstrated that binding of ORF45 to RSK increases the association of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) with RSK, such that ORF45, RSK, and ERK formed high molecular mass protein complexes. We further demonstrated that the complexes shielded active pERK and pRSK from dephosphorylation. As a result, the complex-associated RSK and ERK were activated and sustained at high levels. Finally, we provide evidence that this mechanism contributes to the sustained activation of ERK and RSK in Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus lytic replication.The extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)² mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway has been implicated in diverse cellular physiological processes including proliferation, survival, growth, differentiation, and motility (1-4) and is also exploited by a variety of viruses such as Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV), human cytomegalovirus, human immunodeficiency virus, respiratory syncytial virus, hepatitis B virus, coxsackie, vaccinia, coronavirus, and influenza virus (5-17). The MAPK kinases relay the extracellular signaling through sequential phosphorylation to an array of cytoplasmic and nuclear substrates to elicit specific responses (1, 2, 18). Phosphorylation of MAPK is reversible. The kinetics of deactivation or duration of signaling dictates diverse biological outcomes (19, 20). For example, sustained but not transient activation of ERK signaling induces the differentiation of PC12 cells into sympathetic-like neurons and transformation of NIH3T3 cells (20-22). During viral infection, a unique biphasic ERK activation has been observed for some viruses (an early transient activation triggered by viral binding or entry and a late sustained activation correlated with viral gene expression), but the responsible viral factors and underlying mechanism for the sustained ERK activation remain largely unknown (5, 8, 13, 23).The p90 ribosomal S6 kinases (RSKs) are a family of serine/threonine kinases that lie at the terminus of the ERK pathway (1, 24-26). In mammals, four isoforms are known, RSK1 to RSK4. Each one has two catalytically functional kinase domains, the N-terminal kinase domain (NTKD) and C-terminal kinase domain (CTKD) as well as a linker region between the two. The NTKD is responsible for phosphorylation of exogenous substrates, and the CTKD and linker region regulate RSK activation (1, 24, 25). In quiescent cells ERK binds to the docking site in the C terminus of RSK (27-29). Upon mitogen stimulation, ERK is activated by its upstream MAPK/ERK kinase (MEK). The active ERK phosphorylates Thr-359/Ser-363 of RSK in the linker region (amino acid numbers refer to human RSK1) and Thr-573 in the CTKD activation loop. The activated CTKD then phosphorylates Ser-380 in the linker region, creating a docking site for 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1. The 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1 phosphorylates Ser-221 of RSK in the activation loop and activates the NTKD. The activated NTKD autophosphorylates the serine residue near the ERK docking site, causing a transient dissociation of active ERK from RSK (25, 26, 28). The stimulation of quiescent cells by a mitogen such as epidermal growth factor or a phorbol ester such as 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) usually results in a transient RSK activation that lasts less than 30 min. RSKs have been implicated in regulating cell survival, growth, and proliferation. Mutation or aberrant expression of RSK has been implicated in several human diseases including Coffin-Lowry syndrome and prostate and breast cancers (1, 24, 25, 30-32).KSHV is a human DNA tumor virus etiologically linked to Kaposi sarcoma, primary effusion lymphoma, and a subset of multicentric Castleman disease (33, 34). Infection and reactivation of KSHV activate multiple MAPK pathways (6, 12, 35). Noticeably, the ERK/RSK activation is sustained late during KSHV primary infection and reactivation from latency (5, 6, 12, 23), but the mechanism of the sustained ERK/RSK activation is unclear. Recently, we demonstrated that ORF45, an immediate early and also virion tegument protein of KSHV, interacts with RSK1 and RSK2 and strongly stimulates their kinase activities (23). We also demonstrated that the activation of RSK plays an essential role in KSHV lytic replication (23). In the present study we determined the mechanism of ORF45-induced sustained ERK/RSK activation. We found that ORF45 increases the association of RSK with ERK and protects them from dephosphorylation, causing sustained activation of both ERK and RSK.     

The Neuromediator Glutamate, through Specific Substrate Interactions, Enhances Mitochondrial ATP Production and Reactive Oxygen Species Generation in Nonsynaptic Brain Mitochondria

The finding that upon neuronal activation glutamate is transported postsynaptically from synaptic clefts and increased lactate availability for neurons suggest that brain mitochondria (BM) utilize a mixture of substrates, namely pyruvate, glutamate, and the tricarboxylic acid cycle metabolites. We studied how glutamate affected oxidative phosphorylation and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in rat BM oxidizing pyruvate + malate or succinate. Simultaneous oxidation of glutamate + pyruvate + malate increased state 3 and uncoupled respiration by 52 and 71%, respectively. The state 4 ROS generation increased 100% over BM oxidizing pyruvate + malate and 900% over that of BM oxidizing glutamate + malate. Up to 70% of ROS generation was associated with reverse electron transport. These effects of pyruvate + glutamate + malate were observed only with BM and not with liver or heart mitochondria. The effects of glutamate + pyruvate on succinate-supported respiration and ROS generation were not organ-specific and depended only on whether mitochondria were isolated with or without bovine serum albumin. With the non-bovine serum albumin brain and heart mitochondria oxidizing succinate, the addition of pyruvate and glutamate abrogated inhibition of Complex II by oxaloacetate. We conclude that (i) during neuronal activation, simultaneous oxidation of glutamate + pyruvate temporarily enhances neuronal mitochondrial ATP production, and (ii) intrinsic inhibition of Complex II by oxaloacetate is an inherent mechanism that protects against ROS generation during reverse electron transport.Recently, it has emerged that mitochondrial dysfunctions play an important role in the pathogenesis of degenerative diseases of the central nervous system (1–3). The processes underlying neuronal degeneration are complex, and some authors suggest that several genetic alterations are involved (4). However, another level of complexity may be derived from the fact that virtually all cellular activities depend upon energy metabolism in the cell (5). Alterations in energy metabolism processes within cells may also contribute to pathogenic mechanisms underlying neurodegenerative disease.A large body of evidence suggests that increased oxidative stress is an important pathogenic mechanism that promotes neurodegeneration (6). Because neurons have a long life span, and most neurodegenerative diseases have a clear association with age (7), it is important to understand mechanisms underlying reactive oxygen species (ROS)² production in neurons. Recently, Kudin et al. (8) analyzed the contribution of mitochondria to the total ROS production in brain tissue. They concluded that mitochondria are the major source of ROS and that at least 50% of ROS generated by brain mitochondria was associated with succinate-supported reverse electron transport (RET). Under conditions of normoxia, about 1% of the respiratory chain electron flow was redirected to form superoxide (8).Recently, we suggested that the organization of the respiratory chain complexes into supercomplexes that occurs in brain mitochondria (BM) (9) may represent one of the intrinsic mechanisms to prevent excessive ROS generation (10). In this paper, we put forward the hypothesis that inhibition of Complex II by oxaloacetate (OAA) represents another important intrinsic mechanism to prevent oxidative stress. We provide evidence that glutamate and pyruvate specifically exert control over the production of ROS at the level of Complex II. Below we present a brief account of published theoretical and experimental evidence that underlie our hypothesis.The neural processing of information is metabolically expensive (11). More than 80% of energy is spent postsynaptically to restore the ionic composition of neurons (11). When neurons are activated, reuptake of glutamate stimulates aerobic glycolysis in astroglial cells (12), thereby making lactate the major substrate for neuronal mitochondria (4, 13). However, rapid conversion of lactate to pyruvate in neurons requires activation of the malate-aspartate shuttle (MAS). The shuttle is the major pathway for cytosolic reducing equivalents from NADH to enter the mitochondria and be oxidized (14, 15). The key component of MAS is the mitochondrial aspartate/glutamate carrier (AGC) (16), and recent data suggest that the AGC is expressed mainly in neurons (14). Absence of the AGC from astrocytes in the brain implies a compartmentation of intermediary metabolism, with glycolysis taking place in astrocytes and lactate oxidation in neurons (13, 14, 17). Active operation of MAS requires that a certain amount of glutamate must be transported from synaptic clefts into activated neurons. In isolated BM, it has been shown that besides pyruvate, glutamate is also a good respiratory substrate (5, 18). In the presynaptic elements, the concentration of cytosolic glutamate is ∼10 mm at all times (19). Yudkoff et al. (18) have shown that synaptosomal mitochondria utilize glutamate and pyruvate as mitochondrial respiratory substrates. Glutamate is also oxidized by the astroglial mitochondria (13).Until recently, it was generally accepted that most of the glutamate is rapidly removed from the synaptic cleft by glutamate transporters EAAT1 and EAAT2 located on presynaptic termini and glial cells (20–24). However, recent data show that a significant fraction of glutamate is rapidly bound and transported by the glutamate transporter isoform, EAAT4, located juxtasynaptically in the membranes of spines and dendrites (20, 25–28). At the climbing fiber to Purkinje cell synapses in the cerebellum, about 17% (28) or more than 50% (29) of synaptically released glutamate may be removed by postsynaptic transporters. Besides the cerebellum, EAAT4 protein was found to be omnipresent throughout the fore- and midbrain regions (30). Moreover, it was shown that although most of the EAAT2 protein is astroglial, around 15% is distributed in nerve terminals and axons in hippocampal slices and that this protein may be responsible for more than half of the total uptake of glutamate from synaptic clefts (24). These data suggest that postsynaptic transport of glutamate into nerve terminals where mitochondria are located (31) may occur in all brain regions. According to calculations of Brasnjo and Otis (28), in a single synapse, EAAT4 (excitatory amino acid transporter 4) binds and transports postsynaptically about 1.3 ± 0.1 × 10⁶ glutamate molecules. In the brain, on average, 1 mm³ of tissue contains 1 × 10⁸ synapses (32, 33). Because of the high density of synaptic contacts, the neuronal cells may be exposed to mediators released from hundreds of firing synapses. Thus, in a narrow space of spines and dendrites, several million glutamate molecules postsynaptically transported from synaptic boutons may create local cytosolic concentration of glutamate in the low millimolar range. Consequently, neuronal mitochondria, particularly those located at the axonal or dendritic synaptic junctions, may, in addition to metabolizing pyruvate, temporarily metabolize glutamate and succinate formed during mitochondrial catabolism of γ-aminobutyric acid in postsynaptic cells (34).The purpose of this study was to examine how the neuromediator glutamate affects respiratory activity and ROS generation in nonsynaptic BM when combined with pyruvate and the tricarboxylic acid cycle intermediates succinate and malate. We show that with pyruvate + glutamate + malate, the rate of oxidative phosphorylation increased more than 50%, and in resting mitochondria the rate of ROS generation associated with the reverse electron transport increased severalfold. These effects were observed only with brain and spinal cord mitochondria, not with liver or heart mitochondria, suggesting that they may be restricted to neuronal cells.Taken together, the data presented support the hypothesis that in activated neurons, the neuromediator glutamate stimulates mitochondrial ATP production when energy demand is increased. However, in the absence of energy consumption, glutamate + pyruvate may increase the generation of ROS severalfold. We suggest that intrinsic inhibition of Complex II by oxaloacetate is an important natural protective mechanism against ROS associated with reverse electron transport.     

Bortezomib Overcomes Tumor Necrosis Factor-related Apoptosis-inducing Ligand Resistance in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells in Part through the Inhibition of the Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/Akt Pathway

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common and aggressive human malignancies. Recombinant tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) is a promising anti-tumor agent. However, many HCC cells show resistance to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. In this study, we showed that bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, overcame TRAIL resistance in HCC cells, including Huh-7, Hep3B, and Sk-Hep1. The combination of bortezomib and TRAIL restored the sensitivity of HCC cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Comparing the molecular change in HCC cells treated with these agents, we found that down-regulation of phospho-Akt (P-Akt) played a key role in mediating TRAIL sensitization of bortezomib. The first evidence was that bortezomib down-regulated P-Akt in a dose- and time-dependent manner in TRAIL-treated HCC cells. Second, {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"LY294002","term_id":"1257998346","term_text":"LY294002"}}LY294002, a PI3K inhibitor, also sensitized resistant HCC cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Third, knocking down Akt1 by small interference RNA also enhanced TRAIL-induced apoptosis in Huh-7 cells. Finally, ectopic expression of mutant Akt (constitutive active) in HCC cells abolished TRAIL sensitization effect of bortezomib. Moreover, okadaic acid, a protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) inhibitor, reversed down-regulation of P-Akt in bortezomib-treated cells, and PP2A knockdown by small interference RNA also reduced apoptosis induced by the combination of TRAIL and bortezomib, indicating that PP2A may be important in mediating the effect of bortezomib on TRAIL sensitization. Together, bortezomib overcame TRAIL resistance at clinically achievable concentrations in hepatocellular carcinoma cells, and this effect is mediated at least partly via inhibition of the PI3K/Akt pathway.Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)² is currently the fifth most common solid tumor worldwide and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death. To date, surgery is still the only curative treatment but is only feasible in a small portion of patients (1). Drug treatment is the major therapy for patients with advanced stage disease. Unfortunately, the response rate to traditional chemotherapy for HCC patients is unsatisfactory (1). Novel pharmacological therapy is urgently needed for patients with advanced HCC. In this regard, the approval of sorafenib might open a new era of molecularly targeted therapy in the treatment of HCC patients.Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), a type II transmembrane protein and a member of the TNF family, is a promising anti-tumor agent under clinical investigation (2). TRAIL functions by engaging its receptors expressed on the surface of target cells. Five receptors specific for TRAIL have been identified, including DR4/TRAIL-R1, DR5/TRAIL-R2, DcR1, DcR2, and osteoprotegerin. Among TRAIL receptors, only DR4 and DR5 contain an effective death domain that is essential to formation of death-inducing signaling complex (DISC), a critical step for TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Notably, the trimerization of the death domains recruits an adaptor molecule, Fas-associated protein with death domain (FADD), which subsequently recruits and activates caspase-8. In type I cells, activation of caspase-8 is sufficient to activate caspase-3 to induce apoptosis; however, in another type of cells (type II), the intrinsic mitochondrial pathway is essential for apoptosis characterized by cleavage of Bid and release of cytochrome c from mitochondria, which subsequently activates caspase-9 and caspase-3 (3).Although TRAIL induces apoptosis in malignant cells but sparing normal cells, some tumor cells are resistant to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Mechanisms responsible for the resistance include receptors and intracellular resistance. Although the cell surface expression of DR4 or DR5 is absolutely required for TRAIL-induced apoptosis, tumor cells expressing these death receptors are not always sensitive to TRAIL due to intracellular mechanisms. For example, the cellular FLICE-inhibitory protein (c-FLIP), a homologue to caspase-8 but without protease activity, has been linked to TRAIL resistance in several studies (4, 5). In addition, inactivation of Bax, a proapoptotic Bcl-2 family protein, resulted in resistance to TRAIL in MMR-deficient tumors (6, 7), and reintroduction of Bax into Bax-deficient cells restored TRAIL sensitivity (8), indicating that the Bcl-2 family plays a critical role in intracellular mechanisms for resistance of TRAIL.Bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor approved clinically for multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma, has been investigated intensively for many types of cancer (9). Accumulating studies indicate that the combination of bortezomib and TRAIL overcomes the resistance to TRAIL in various types of cancer, including acute myeloid leukemia (4), lymphoma (10–13), prostate (14–17), colon (15, 18, 19), bladder (14, 16), renal cell carcinoma (20), thyroid (21), ovary (22), non-small cell lung (23, 24), sarcoma (25), and HCC (26, 27). Molecular targets responsible for the sensitizing effect of bortezomib on TRAIL-induced cell death include DR4 (14, 27), DR5 (14, 20, 22–23, 28), c-FLIP (4, 11, 21–23, 29), NF-κB (12, 24, 30), p21 (16, 21, 25), and p27 (25). In addition, Bcl-2 family also plays a role in the combinational effect of bortezomib and TRAIL, including Bcl-2 (10, 21), Bax (13, 22), Bak (27), Bcl-xL (21), Bik (18), and Bim (15).Recently, we have reported that Akt signaling is a major molecular determinant in bortezomib-induced apoptosis in HCC cells (31). In this study, we demonstrated that bortezomib overcame TRAIL resistance in HCC cells through inhibition of the PI3K/Akt pathway.     

Mapping Daunorubicin-binding Sites in the ATP-binding Cassette Transporter MsbA Using Site-specific Quenching by Spin Labels

ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters transduce the free energy of ATP hydrolysis to power the mechanical work of substrate translocation across cell membranes. MsbA is an ABC transporter implicated in trafficking lipid A across the inner membrane of Escherichia coli. It has sequence similarity and overlapping substrate specificity with multidrug ABC transporters that export cytotoxic molecules in humans and prokaryotes. Despite rapid advances in structure determination of ABC efflux transporters, little is known regarding the location of substrate-binding sites in the transmembrane segment and the translocation pathway across the membrane. In this study, we have mapped residues proximal to the daunorubicin (DNR)-binding site in MsbA using site-specific, ATP-dependent quenching of DNR intrinsic fluorescence by spin labels. In the nucleotide-free MsbA intermediate, DNR-binding residues cluster at the cytoplasmic end of helices 3 and 6 at a site accessible from the membrane/water interface and extending into an aqueous chamber formed at the interface between the two transmembrane domains. Binding of a nonhydrolyzable ATP analog inverts the transporter to an outward-facing conformation and relieves DNR quenching by spin labels suggesting DNR exclusion from proximity to the spin labels. The simplest model consistent with our data has DNR entering near an elbow helix parallel to the water/membrane interface, partitioning into the open chamber, and then translocating toward the periplasm upon ATP binding.ATP-binding cassette (ABC)² transporters transduce the energy of ATP hydrolysis to power the movement of a wide range of substrates across the cell membranes (1, 2). They constitute the largest family of prokaryotic transporters, import essential cell nutrients, flip lipids, and export toxic molecules (3). Forty eight human ABC transporters have been identified, including ABCB1, or P-glycoprotein, which is implicated in cross-resistance to drugs and cytotoxic molecules (4, 5). Inherited mutations in these proteins are linked to diseases such as cystic fibrosis, persistent hypoglycemia of infancy, and immune deficiency (6).The functional unit of an ABC transporter consists of four modules. Two highly conserved ABCs or nucleotide-binding domains (NBDs) bind and hydrolyze ATP to supply the active energy for transport (7). ABCs drive the mechanical work of proteins with diverse functions ranging from membrane transport to DNA repair (3, 5). Substrate specificity is determined by two transmembrane domains (TMDs) that also provide the translocation pathway across the bilayer (7). Bacterial ABC exporters are expressed as monomers, each consisting of one NBD and one TMD, that dimerize to form the active transporter (3). The number of transmembrane helices and their organization differ significantly between ABC importers and exporters reflecting the divergent structural and chemical nature of their substrates (1, 8, 9). Furthermore, ABC exporters bind substrates directly from the cytoplasm or bilayer inner leaflet and release them to the periplasm or bilayer outer leaflet (10, 11). In contrast, bacterial importers have their substrates delivered to the TMD by a dedicated high affinity substrate-binding protein (12).In Gram-negative bacteria, lipid A trafficking from its synthesis site on the inner membrane to its final destination in the outer membrane requires the ABC transporter MsbA (13). Although MsbA has not been directly shown to transport lipid A, suppression of MsbA activity leads to cytoplasmic accumulation of lipid A and inhibits bacterial growth strongly suggesting a role in translocation (14-16). In addition to this role in lipid A transport, MsbA shares sequence similarity with multidrug ABC transporters such as human ABCB1, LmrA of Lactococcus lactis, and Sav1866 of Staphylococcus aureus (16-19). ABCB1, a prototype of the ABC family, is a plasma membrane protein whose overexpression provides resistance to chemotherapeutic agents in cancer cells (1). LmrA and MsbA have overlapping substrate specificity with ABCB1 suggesting that both proteins can function as drug exporters (18, 20). Indeed, cells expressing MsbA confer resistance to erythromycin and ethidium bromide (21). MsbA can be photolabeled with the ABCB1/LmrA substrate azidopine and can transport Hoechst 33342 ({"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"H33342","term_id":"978759","term_text":"H33342"}}H33342) across membrane vesicles in an energy-dependent manner (21).The structural mechanics of ABC exporters was revealed from comparison of the MsbA crystal structures in the apo- and nucleotide-bound states as well as from analysis by spin labeling EPR spectroscopy in liposomes (17, 19, 22, 23). The energy harnessed from ATP binding and hydrolysis drives a cycle of NBD association and dissociation that is transmitted to induce reorientation of the TMD from an inward- to outward-facing conformation (17, 19, 22). Large amplitude motion closes the cytoplasmic end of a chamber found at the interface between the two TMDs and opens it to the periplasm (23). These rearrangements lead to significant changes in chamber hydration, which may drive substrate translocation (22).Substrate binding must precede energy input, otherwise the cycle is futile, wasting the energy of ATP hydrolysis without substrate extrusion (7). Consistent with this model, ATP binding reduces ABCB1 substrate affinity, potentially through binding site occlusion (24-26). Furthermore, the TMD substrate-binding event signals the NBD to stimulate ATP hydrolysis increasing transport efficiency (1, 27, 28). However, there is a paucity of information regarding the location of substrate binding, the transport pathway, and the structural basis of substrate recognition by ABC exporters. In vitro studies of MsbA substrate specificity identify a broad range of substrates that stimulate ATPase activity (29). In addition to the putative physiological substrates lipid A and lipopolysaccharide (LPS), the ABCB1 substrates Ilmofosine, {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"H33342","term_id":"978759","term_text":"H33342"}}H33342, and verapamil differentially enhance ATP hydrolysis of MsbA (29, 30). Intrinsic MsbA tryptophan (Trp) fluorescence quenching by these putative substrate molecules provides further support of interaction (29).Extensive biochemical analysis of ABCB1 and LmrA provides a general model of substrate binding to ABC efflux exporters. This so-called “hydrophobic cleaner model” describes substrates binding from the inner leaflet of the bilayer and then translocating through the TMD (10, 31, 32). These studies also identified a large number of residues involved in substrate binding and selectivity (33). When these crucial residues are mapped onto the crystal structures of MsbA, a subset of homologous residues clusters to helices 3 and 6 lining the putative substrate pathway (34). Consistent with a role in substrate binding and specificity, simultaneous replacement of two serines (Ser-289 and Ser-290) in helix 6 of MsbA reduces binding and transport of ethidium and taxol, although {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"H33342","term_id":"978759","term_text":"H33342"}}H33342 and erythromycin interactions remain unaffected (34).The tendency of lipophilic substrates to partition into membranes confounds direct analysis of substrate interactions with ABC exporters (35, 36). Such partitioning may promote dynamic collisions with exposed Trp residues and nonspecific cross-linking in photo-affinity labeling experiments. In this study, we utilize a site-specific quenching approach to identify residues in the vicinity of the daunorubicin (DNR)-binding site (37). Although the data on DNR stimulation of ATP hydrolysis is inconclusive (20, 29, 30), the quenching of MsbA Trp fluorescence suggests a specific interaction. Spin labels were introduced along transmembrane helices 3, 4, and 6 of MsbA to assess their ATP-dependent quenching of DNR fluorescence. Residues that quench DNR cluster along the cytoplasmic end of helices 3 and 6 consistent with specific binding of DNR. Furthermore, many of these residues are not lipid-exposed but face the putative substrate chamber formed between the two TMDs. These residues are proximal to two Trps, which likely explains the previously reported quenching (29). Our results suggest DNR partitions to the membrane and then binds MsbA in a manner consistent with the hydrophobic cleaner model. Interpretation in the context of the crystal structures of MsbA identifies a putative translocation pathway through the transmembrane segment.     

Interaction of Mint2 with TrkA Is Involved in Regulation of Nerve Growth Factor-induced Neurite Outgrowth

TrkA receptor signaling is essential for nerve growth factor (NGF)-induced survival and differentiation of sensory neurons. To identify possible effectors or regulators of TrkA signaling, yeast two-hybrid screening was performed using the intracellular domain of TrkA as bait. We identified muc18-1-interacting protein 2 (Mint2) as a novel TrkA-binding protein and found that the phosphotyrosine binding domain of Mint2 interacted with TrkA in a phosphorylation- and ligand-independent fashion. Coimmunoprecipitation assays showed that endogenous TrkA interacted with Mint2 in rat tissue homogenates, and immunohistochemical evidence revealed that Mint2 and TrkA colocalized in rat dorsal root ganglion neurons. Furthermore, Mint2 overexpression inhibited NGF-induced neurite outgrowth in both PC12 and cultured dorsal root ganglion neurons, whereas inhibition of Mint2 expression by RNA interference facilitated NGF-induced neurite outgrowth. Moreover, Mint2 was found to promote the retention of TrkA in the Golgi apparatus and inhibit its surface sorting. Taken together, our data provide evidence that Mint2 is a novel TrkA-regulating protein that affects NGF-induced neurite outgrowth, possibly through a mechanism involving retention of TrkA in the Golgi apparatus.The neurotrophin family member nerve growth factor (NGF)³ is essential for proper development, patterning, and maintenance of nervous systems (1, 2). NGF has two known receptors; TrkA, a single-pass transmembrane receptor-tyrosine kinase that binds selectively to NGF, and p75, a transmembrane glycoprotein that binds all members of the neurotrophin family (3, 4). NGF binding activates the kinase domain of TrkA, leading to autophosphorylation (5). The resulting phosphotyrosines become docking sites for adaptor proteins involved in signal transduction pathways that lead to the activation of Ras, Rac, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, phospholipase Cγ, and other effectors (2, 6). Many of these TrkA-interacting adaptor proteins have been identified and include, Grb2, APS, SH2B, fibroblast growth factor receptor substrate 2 (FRS-2), Shc, and human tumor imaginal disc 1 (TID1) (7-10). The identification of these binding partners has contributed greatly to our understanding of the mechanisms underlying the functional diversity of NGF-TrkA signaling.Studies have indicated that the transmission of NGF signaling in neurons involves retrograde transport of NGF-TrkA complexes from the neurite tip to the cell body (11-14). TrkA associates with components of cytoplasmic dynein, and it is thought that vesicular trafficking of neurotrophins occurs via direct interaction of Trk receptors with the dynein motor machinery (14). Furthermore, the atypical protein kinase C-interacting protein, p62, associates with TrkA and plays a novel role in connecting receptor signals with the endosomal signaling network required for mediating TrkA-induced differentiation (15). Recently, the membrane-trafficking protein Pincher has been found to mediate macroendocytosis underlying retrograde signaling by TrkA (16). Despite the progress made to date in understanding Trk complex internalization and trafficking, the mechanisms remain poorly understood.Mint2 (muc18-1-interacting protein 2) belongs to the Mint protein family, which consists of three members, Mint1, Mint2, and Mint3. Mint proteins were first identified as interacting proteins of the synaptic vesicle-docking protein Munc18-1 (17, 18). Mint1 is also sometimes referred to as mLIN-10, as it is the mammalian orthologue of the Caenorhabditis elegans LIN-10 (19). Additionally, Mint1, Mint2, and Mint3 are also referred to as X11α or X11, X11β or X11L (X11-like), and X11γ or X11L2 (X11-like 2), respectively (20). All Mint proteins contain a conserved central phosphotyrosine binding (PTB) domain and two contiguous C-terminal PDZ domains (repeated sequences in the brain-specific protein PSD-95, the Drosophila septate junction protein Discs large, and the epithelial tight junction protein ZO-1) (17, 18, 21). Mint1 and Mint2 are expressed only in neuronal tissue (17), whereas Mint3 is ubiquitously expressed (18). Although the function of Mints proteins is not fully clear, their interactions with the docking and exocytosis factors Mun18 -1 and CASK, ADP-ribosylation factor (Arf) GTPases involved in vesicle budding (22), and other synaptic adaptor proteins, such as neurabin-II/spinophilin (23), tamalin (24), and kalirin-7 (25), all suggest possible roles for Mints in synaptic vesicle docking and exocytosis. Mint proteins have also been implicated in the trafficking and/or processing of β-amyloid precursor protein (β-APP). Through their PTB domains, all three Mints bind to a motif within the cytoplasmic domain of β-APP (21, 26-29), and Mint1 and Mint2 can stabilize β-APP, affect β-APP processing, and inhibit the production and secretion of Aβ (28, 30-32). Although the mechanisms by which Mints inhibit β-APP processing are not yet well known, Mints and their binding partners have emerged as potential therapeutic targets for the treatment of Alzheimer disease.To uncover new TrkA-interacting factors and gain insight into the mechanisms that guide TrkA intracellular trafficking and other aspects of TrkA signaling, we conducted a yeast two-hybrid screen of a brain cDNA library using the intracellular domain of TrkA as bait. The screen identified several candidate TrkA-interacting proteins, one of which was Mint2. Follow-up binding assays showed that the PTB domain of Mint2 alone was necessary and sufficient for mediating the interaction with TrkA. Endogenous Mint2 was also coimmunoprecipitated and colocalized with TrkA in rat DRG tissue. Overexpression and knockdown studies showed that Mint2 could significantly inhibit NGF-induced neurite outgrowth in both TrkA-expressing PC12 cells and DRG neurons. Moreover, Mint2 was found to induce the retention of TrkA in the Golgi apparatus and inhibit its surface sorting. Our results suggest that Mint2 is a novel regulator of TrkA receptor signaling.     

Single Neuron Ubiquitin-Proteasome Dynamics Accompanying Inclusion Body Formation in Huntington Disease

The accumulation of mutant protein in intracellular aggregates is a common feature of neurodegenerative disease. In Huntington disease, mutant huntingtin leads to inclusion body (IB) formation and neuronal toxicity. Impairment of the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) has been implicated in IB formation and Huntington disease pathogenesis. However, IBs form asynchronously in only a subset of cells with mutant huntingtin, and the relationship between IB formation and UPS function has been difficult to elucidate. Here, we applied single-cell longitudinal acquisition and analysis to monitor mutant huntingtin IB formation, UPS function, and neuronal toxicity. We found that proteasome inhibition is toxic to striatal neurons in a dose-dependent fashion. Before IB formation, the UPS is more impaired in neurons that go on to form IBs than in those that do not. After forming IBs, impairment is lower in neurons with IBs than in those without. These findings suggest IBs are a protective cellular response to mutant protein mediated in part by improving intracellular protein degradation.Huntington disease (HD)⁴ is a progressive incurable neurodegenerative disorder caused by the expansion of a polyglutamine (polyQ) stretch in the N-terminal end of the huntingtin (htt) protein above a threshold length of ∼36 (1). The deposition of polyQ-expanded aggregated mutant htt in inclusion bodies (IBs) is a hallmark of HD, and IBs are found in human post-mortem samples, transgenic mouse brain, and cell-culture models (2). The accumulation of ubiquitinated proteins in IBs has implicated the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) in the pathogenesis of HD, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Parkinson disease, and polyQ-mediated disorders (3).The UPS is a major pathway of intracellular protein degradation. After a series of three reactions, each catalyzed by a different set of enzymes, ubiquitin, a 76-amino acid polypeptide, forms an isopeptide bond with the amino group of lysine residues on substrate proteins. Several lysine residues within ubiquitin are sites for more ubiquitin additions. Once a protein accumulates four or more ubiquitins, it is efficiently targeted to the proteasome for degradation. The proteasome binds polyubiquitinated substrates and hydrolyzes ubiquitin isopeptide bonds, releasing ubiquitin moieties before degrading substrate proteins through chymotrypsin-like, trypsin-like, and post-glutamyl peptidase activities (3).Increased polyubiquitin levels and changes in ubiquitin linkages accompany the accumulation of UPS substrates in the brains of HD patients and transgenic mice and in cellular HD models (4). UPS substrates accumulate throughout the cell in polyQ models, even before IB formation (5, 6). This has added to the confusion over whether polyQ expansion leads to toxicity through direct impairment of proteasomal degradation. Proteasomes have been reported to cleave polyQ stretches efficiently (7), inefficiently (8), or essentially not at all (9). In vivo, polyQ-dependent degeneration occurs with no detectable proteasome inhibition (10, 11) or is tightly linked to it (12, 13). The inability of some studies to detect UPS impairment in HD models may be due to the limited sensitivity of conventional approaches to identify cell-to-cell variations in UPS function.The relationship between IB formation and UPS function has been difficult to determine. Protein turnover in cells with IBs is evidently reduced and accompanied by the accumulation of cellular proteins (14–16); HEK293 cells containing mutant htt IBs have a greater degree of UPS impairment than those without IBs (5). Proteasome subunits and heat shock proteins colocalize with IBs, but it is unclear if this colocalization facilitates protein delivery or unfolding at the mouth of active proteasomes, or if it harms proteasome function by sequestering essential cellular machinery (18). Some IBs are relatively static (8, 25), but the proteins in others are dynamically exchanged with cytoplasmic and nuclear pools (19, 20).UPS function is critical to cellular homeostasis. Deletion of one of the two inducible polyubiquitin genes in mice leads to lower intracellular ubiquitin levels in germ cells and hypothalamic neurons. These same populations undergo cell-cycle arrest and hypothalamic neurodegeneration, respectively (22, 23). Cell lines expressing mutant huntingtin accumulate ubiquitinated proteins and undergo cell-cycle arrest in G2/M (5). In neurons, UPS impairment may lead to cell death through an accumulation of signals for apoptosis, a decrease in NF-κB signaling, sensitization to other toxic stimuli, remodeling of synapses, retraction of neurites, or other unidentified mechanisms (24). The effect of UPS impairment depends on cell type and cell cycle, and the relationship between UPS impairment and striatal neuronal survival is largely unknown.Diffuse species of mutant htt induce IB formation and neuronal death in a protein concentration-dependent manner (2). IB formation delays neuronal death, suggesting that IB formation helps neurons cope with toxic diffuse mutant htt. Whether the effect of IB formation on survival is mediated through UPS function has been difficult to determine. IB formation and neuronal death occur asynchronously in overlapping but distinct subsets of neurons that express mutant htt. The observation that IB formation is not required for UPS impairment also complicates population analysis (6, 26).To explore this problem, we applied single-cell analysis. We tracked single neurons over their entire lifetimes, gaining spatial and temporal resolution while simultaneously monitoring IB formation, UPS inhibition, and neuronal toxicity.     

Starving Neurons Show Sex Difference in Autophagy

Sex-dependent differences in adaptation to famine have long been appreciated, thought to hinge on female versus male preferences for fat versus protein sources, respectively. However, whether these differences can be reduced to neurons, independent of typical nutrient depots, such as adipose tissue, skeletal muscle, and liver, was heretofore unknown. A vital adaptation to starvation is autophagy, a mechanism for recycling amino acids from organelles and proteins. Here we show that segregated neurons from males in culture are more vulnerable to starvation than neurons from females. Nutrient deprivation decreased mitochondrial respiration, increased autophagosome formation, and produced cell death more profoundly in neurons from males versus females. Starvation-induced neuronal death was attenuated by 3-methyladenine, an inhibitor of autophagy; Atg7 knockdown using small interfering RNA; or l-carnitine, essential for transport of fatty acids into mitochondria, all more effective in neurons from males versus females. Relative tolerance to nutrient deprivation in neurons from females was associated with a marked increase in triglyceride and free fatty acid content and a cytosolic phospholipase A2-dependent increase in formation of lipid droplets. Similar sex differences in sensitivity to nutrient deprivation were seen in fibroblasts. However, although inhibition of autophagy using Atg7 small interfering RNA inhibited cell death during starvation in neurons, it increased cell death in fibroblasts, implying that the role of autophagy during starvation is both sex- and tissue-dependent. Thus, during starvation, neurons from males more readily undergo autophagy and die, whereas neurons from females mobilize fatty acids, accumulate triglycerides, form lipid droplets, and survive longer.Sex-dependent differences in adaptation to famine have long been appreciated (1, 2), thought to hinge on a female preference for fat sources, in contrast to a male preference for protein sources (3). Fatty acid metabolism is different between sexes normally (4) and under conditions of starvation (1, 2). During exercise, in addition to increases in carbohydrate requirement, men increase their need for amino acids, whereas women increase mobilization of fat (5). Furthermore, sex-dependent responses to nutritional stress associated with either self-induced weight loss or illness-related cachexia also exist (6, 7).An important adaptation to starvation is autophagy (autophagy-associated proteins, abbreviated ATG). Classic, starvation-induced autophagy is initiated by nutrient and amino acid deprivation, glucagon, and cAMP (8, 9). ATG7, a ubiquitin E1-like enzyme, is essential for autophagy, with phosphorylation of preautophagosomal membranes, formation of ATG12-ATG5 complexes, and processing of ATG8/LC3 (microtubule-associated protein light chain-3) as other crucial steps in this process (10). Starvation-induced autophagy is regulated by class III phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and the Bcl-2-interacting partner, Beclin-1 (11). The autophagosomes then engulf cytoplasmic material and/or organelles, such as mitochondria, the latter sometimes referred to as “mitophagy,” disassembling large proteins and organelles to recycle amino acids and other nutrients, an important response to starvation (12).It is unknown whether starvation can induce autophagy in the brain; however, there is evidence that critical starvation can result in brain atrophy in humans. It has been reported that ∼30% of people during a prolonged hunger strike (mean of 199 days) will show brain tissue loss (13), and brain shrinkage in patients with anorexia nervosa is well documented (14, 15). Although 48 h of food deprivation does not produce detectable autophagy in brains from mice (16), the aforementioned reports are consistent with long durations of starvation as a bona fide stimulus for autophagy in brain. There are recent studies suggesting that other stimuli can induce autophagy in the brain, such as trauma (17) and ischemia (18), and that autophagy may contribute to neuronal death. There is also evidence for autophagy in the human brain after trauma and critical illness (19), which probably includes both elements of malnutrition and systemic stress. A potential role for brain atrophy as a contributor to neurological morbidity in the critically ill and injured is an emerging topic (20).