Sequential Loading of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ku and Cdc13p to Telomeres

Ku is a heterodimeric protein involved in nonhomologous end-joining of the DNA double-stranded break repair pathway. It binds to the double-stranded DNA ends and then activates a series of repair enzymes that join the broken DNA. In addition to its function in DNA repair, the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ku (Yku) is also a component of telomere protein-DNA complexes that affect telomere function. The yeast telomeres are composed of duplex C_1–3(A/T)G_1–3 telomeric DNA repeats plus single-stranded TG_1–3 telomeric DNA tails. Here we show that Yku is capable of binding to a tailed-duplex DNA formed by telomeric DNA that mimics the structure of telomeres. Addition of Cdc13p, a single-stranded telomeric DNA-binding protein, to the Yku-DNA complex enables the formation of a ternary complex with Cdc13p binding to the single-stranded tail of the DNA substrate. Because pre-loading of Cdc13p to the single-stranded telomeric tail inhibits the binding of Yku, the results suggested that loading of Yku and Cdc13p to telomeres is sequential. Through generating a double-stranded break near telomeric DNA sequences, we found that Ku protein appears to bind to the de novo synthesized telomeres earlier than that of Cdc13p in vivo. Thus, our results indicated that Yku interacts directly with telomeres and that sequential loading of Yku followed by Cdc13p to telomeres is required for both proteins to form a ternary complex on telomeres. Our results also offer a mechanism that the binding of Cdc13p to telomeres might prevent Yku from initiating DNA double-stranded break repair pathway on telomeres.DNA damages in the form of double-stranded breaks (DSBs)⁴ compromise the integrity of genomes. Failure in repairing or mis-repairing double-stranded breaks can lead to chromosome instability and eventually cell death or cancer (1). Double-stranded breaks are repaired by two main pathways, the homologous recombination and nonhomologous DNA end-joining. In nonhomologous DNA end-joining, Ku is the first protein to bind to the DNA ends to initiate the repair pathway (2). Upon binding, Ku then recruits a series of repair enzymes to join the broken ends (2). Ku is a heterodimeric protein composed of 70- and ∼80-kDa subunits. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Ku includes Yku70 and Yku80 subunits. Because the biochemical configuration of the broken ends could be very diverse on DSBs, Ku binds to double-stranded ends in a sequence- and energy-independent manner. It is capable of binding to DNA ends with blunt 3′-overhangs or 5′-overhangs as well as double-stranded DNA with nicks, gaps, or internal loops (3–7). However, Ku does not have high affinity to single-stranded DNA. The crystal structure of human Ku heterodimer indicates that it forms a ring structure that encircles duplex DNA (7). This unique structure feature enables Ku to recognize DNA ends and achieves its high affinity binding.In additional to the role in double-stranded break repair, Ku was shown to be a component of telomeric protein-DNA complex in yeast and mammals (8–10). Telomeres are terminal structures of chromosomes composed of short tandem repeated sequences (11, 12). Mutation of YKU70 or YKU80 causes defects in telomere structure (13–15), telomere silencing (16–19), and replication timing of telomeres (20). The function of yeast Ku (Yku) on telomeres could mediate through protein-protein interaction with Sir4p or protein-RNA interaction with Tlc1 RNA (21, 22). For example, through the interaction with Sir4p, Yku selectively affects telomeres silencing but not the silent mating type loci (17). Yku could also bind to telomerase Tlc1 RNA for telomere length maintenance (22). Judged by the DNA binding activity of Yku, it is reasonable to suggest that it may bind directly to telomeric DNA. Indeed, it was shown that human Ku is capable of binding directly to telomeric DNA in vitro (15). Moreover, because the deletion of SIR4 in budding yeast (23) or Taz1 in fission yeast (24) does not abolish the association of Ku with chromosomal ends, this suggests that Ku might bind directly to telomeric DNA in cells. However, because yeast telomeres have a short 12–14-mer single-stranded tail (25), it is uncertain whether Yku could pass the single-stranded region to reach its binding site. The direct binding of Yku to telomeric DNA has not been experimentally determined.In contrast to double-stranded breaks, the ends of linear chromosomes are not recognized by repair enzymes as DNA damage. In S. cerevisiae, Cdc13p is the single-stranded TG_1–3 DNA-binding protein that enables cells to differentiate whether the ends of a linear DNA are telomeres or broken ends (26–29). Thus, although the mechanism of how cells prevent the activation of DSB repair pathway in telomere is unclear, it is likely that binding of Cdc13p to telomeres might inhibit the initiation of DNA damage response by the Ku protein. Here, using a tailed-duplex DNA synthesized by telomeric DNA sequences to mimic telomere structure, we showed that Yku binds directly to this tailed-duplex DNA substrate and forms a ternary complex with Cdc13p. Our results also showed that Yku loaded to a de novo synthesized telomere earlier than Cdc13p in vivo. These results support the direct binding of Yku to telomeric DNA and that the spatial orientation of Cdc13p might block the activation of DSB repair pathway on telomeres.     

RecR-mediated Modulation of RecF Dimer Specificity for Single- and Double-stranded DNA

RecF pathway proteins play an important role in the restart of stalled replication and DNA repair in prokaryotes. Following DNA damage, RecF, RecR, and RecO initiate homologous recombination (HR) by loading of the RecA recombinase on single-stranded (ss) DNA, protected by ssDNA-binding protein. The specific role of RecF in this process is not well understood. Previous studies have proposed that RecF directs the RecOR complex to boundaries of damaged DNA regions by recognizing single-stranded/double-stranded (ss/ds) DNA junctions. RecF belongs to ABC-type ATPases, which function through an ATP-dependent dimerization. Here, we demonstrate that the RecF of Deinococcus radiodurans interacts with DNA as an ATP-dependent dimer, and that the DNA binding and ATPase activity of RecF depend on both the structure of DNA substrate, and the presence of RecR. We found that RecR interacts as a tetramer with the RecF dimer. RecR increases the RecF affinity to dsDNA without stimulating ATP hydrolysis but destabilizes RecF binding to ssDNA and dimerization, likely due to increasing the ATPase rate. The DNA-dependent binding of RecR to the RecF-DNA complex occurs through specific protein-protein interactions without significant contributions from RecR-DNA interactions. Finally, RecF neither alone nor in complex with RecR preferentially binds to the ss/dsDNA junction. Our data suggest that the specificity of the RecFOR complex toward the boundaries of DNA damaged regions may result from a network of protein-protein and DNA-protein interactions, rather than a simple recognition of the ss/dsDNA junction by RecF.Homologous recombination (HR)² is one of the primary mechanisms by which cells repair dsDNA breaks (DSBs) and ssDNA gaps (SSGs), and is important for restart of stalled DNA replication (1). HR is initiated when RecA-like recombinases bind to ssDNA forming an extended nucleoprotein filament, referred to as a presynaptic complex (2). The potential for genetic rearrangements dictates that HR initiation is tightly regulated at multiple levels (1). During replication, the ssDNA-binding protein (SSB) protects transiently unwound DNA chains, preventing interactions with recombinases. Following DNA damage, recombination mediator proteins (RMPs) initiate HR by facilitating the formation of the recombinase filaments with ssDNA, while removing SSB (3, 4). Mutations in human proteins involved in HR initiation are linked to cancer predisposition, chromosome instability, UV sensitivity, and premature aging diseases (4–8). To date, little is known about the mechanism by which RMPs regulate the formation of the recombinase filaments on the SSB-protected ssDNA.In Escherichia coli, there are two major recombination pathways, RecBCD and RecF (9, 10). A helicase/nuclease RecBCD complex processes DSBs and recruits RecA on ssDNA in a sequence-specific manner (11–13). The principle players in the RecF pathway are the RecF, RecO, and RecR proteins, which form an epistatic group that is important for SSG repair, for restart of stalled DNA replication, and under specific conditions, can also process DSBs (14–20). Homologs of RecF, -O, and -R are present in the majority of known bacteria (21), including Deinococcus radiodurans, extremely radiation-resistant bacteria that lacks the RecBCD pathway, yet is capable of repairing thousands of DSBs (22, 23). In addition, the sequence or functional homologs of RecF pathway proteins are involved in similar pathways in eukaryotes that include among others WRN, BLM, RAD52, and BRCA2 proteins (4–8).The involvement of all three RecF, -O, and -R proteins in HR initiation is well documented by genetic and cellular approaches (18, 24–30), yet their biochemical functions in the initiation process remain unclear, particularly with respect to RecF. RecO and RecR proteins are sufficient to promote formation of the RecA filament on SSB-bound ssDNA in vitro (27). The UV-sensitive phenotype of recF mutants can be suppressed by RecOR overexpression, suggesting that RecF may direct the RMP complex to DNA-damaged regions where HR initiation is required (31). In agreement with this hypothesis, RecF dramatically increases the efficiency of the RecA loading at ds/ssDNA junctions with a 3′ ssDNA extension under specific conditions (32). RecF and RecR proteins also prevent the RecA filaments from extending into dsDNA regions adjacent to SSGs (33). These data suggest that RecF may directly recognize an ss/dsDNA junction structure (34). However, DNA binding experiments have not provided clear evidence to support such a hypothesis (11).The targeting promoted by RecF may also occur through more complex processes. RecF shares a high structural similarity with the head domain of Rad50, an ABC-type ATPase that recognizes DSBs and initiates repair in archaea and eukaryotes (35). All known ABC-type ATPases function as oligomeric complexes in which a sequence of inter- and intra-molecular interactions is triggered by the ATP-dependent dimerization and the dimer-dependent ATP hydrolysis (36–39). RecF is also an ATP-dependent DNA-binding protein and a weak DNA-dependent ATPase (11, 40). RecF forms an ATP-dependent dimer and all three conserved motifs (Walker A, Walker B, and “signature”) of RecF are important for ATP-dependent dimerization, ATP hydrolysis, and functional resistance to DNA damage (35). Thus, RecF may function in recombination initiation through a complex pathway of protein-protein and DNA-protein interactions regulated by ATP-dependent RecF dimerization.In this report, we present a detailed characterization of the RecF dimerization, and its role in the RecF interaction with various DNA substrates, with RecR, and in ATP hydrolysis. Our data outline the following key findings. First, RecF interacts with DNA as a dimer. Second, neither RecF alone nor the RecFR complex preferentially binds the ss/dsDNA junction. Finally, RecR changes the ATPase activity and the DNA binding of RecF by destabilizing the interaction with ssDNA, and greatly enhancing the interaction with dsDNA. Our results suggest that the specificity of RecF for the boundaries of SSGs is likely to result from a sequence of protein-protein interaction events rather than a simple RecF ss/dsDNA binding, underlining a highly regulated mechanism of the HR initiation by the RecFOR proteins.     

Recombination Activator Function of the Novel RAD51- and RAD51B-binding Protein, Human EVL

The RAD51 protein is a central player in homologous recombinational repair. The RAD51B protein is one of five RAD51 paralogs that function in the homologous recombinational repair pathway in higher eukaryotes. In the present study, we found that the human EVL (Ena/Vasp-like) protein, which is suggested to be involved in actin-remodeling processes, unexpectedly binds to the RAD51 and RAD51B proteins and stimulates the RAD51-mediated homologous pairing and strand exchange. The EVL knockdown cells impaired RAD51 assembly onto damaged DNA after ionizing radiation or mitomycin C treatment. The EVL protein alone promotes single-stranded DNA annealing, and the recombination activities of the EVL protein are further enhanced by the RAD51B protein. The expression of the EVL protein is not ubiquitous, but it is significantly expressed in breast cancer-derived MCF7 cells. These results suggest that the EVL protein is a novel recombination factor that may be required for repairing specific DNA lesions, and that may cause tumor malignancy by its inappropriate expression.Chromosomal DNA double strand breaks (DSBs)² are potential inducers of chromosomal aberrations and tumorigenesis, and they are accurately repaired by the homologous recombinational repair (HRR) pathway, without base substitutions, deletions, and insertions (1–3). In the HRR pathway (4, 5), single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) tails are produced at the DSB sites. The RAD51 protein, a eukaryotic homologue of the bacterial RecA protein, binds to the ssDNA tail and forms a helical nucleoprotein filament. The RAD51-ssDNA filament then binds to the intact double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) to form a three-component complex, containing ssDNA, dsDNA, and the RAD51 protein. In this three-component complex, the RAD51 protein promotes recombination reactions, such as homologous pairing and strand exchange (6–9).The RAD51 protein requires auxiliary proteins to promote the homologous pairing and strand exchange reactions efficiently in cells (10–12). In humans, the RAD52, RAD54, and RAD54B proteins directly interact with the RAD51 protein (13–17) and stimulate the RAD51-mediated homologous pairing and/or strand exchange reactions in vitro (18–21). The human RAD51AP1 protein, which directly binds to the RAD51 protein (22), was also found to stimulate RAD51-mediated homologous pairing in vitro (23, 24). The BRCA2 protein contains ssDNA-binding, dsDNA-binding, and RAD51-binding motifs (25–33), and the Ustilago maydis BRCA2 ortholog, Brh2, reportedly stimulated RAD51-mediated strand exchange (34, 35). Most of these RAD51-interacting factors are known to be required for efficient RAD51 assembly onto DSB sites in cells treated with ionizing radiation (10–12).The RAD51B (RAD51L1, Rec2) protein is a member of the RAD51 paralogs, which share about 20–30% amino acid sequence similarity with the RAD51 protein (36–38). RAD51B-deficient cells are hypersensitive to DSB-inducing agents, such as cisplatin, mitomycin C (MMC), and γ-rays, indicating that the RAD51B protein is involved in the HRR pathway (39–44). Genetic experiments revealed that RAD51B-deficient cells exhibited impaired RAD51 assembly onto DSB sites (39, 44), suggesting that the RAD51B protein functions in the early stage of the HRR pathway. Biochemical experiments also suggested that the RAD51B protein participates in the early to late stages of the HRR pathway (45–47).In the present study, we found that the human EVL (Ena/Vasp-like) protein binds to the RAD51 and RAD51B proteins in a HeLa cell extract. The EVL protein is known to be involved in cytoplasmic actin remodeling (48) and is also overexpressed in breast cancer (49). Like the RAD51B knockdown cells, the EVL knockdown cells partially impaired RAD51 foci formation after DSB induction, suggesting that the EVL protein enhances RAD51 assembly onto DSB sites. The purified EVL protein preferentially bound to ssDNA and stimulated RAD51-mediated homologous pairing and strand exchange. The EVL protein also promoted the annealing of complementary strands. These recombination reactions that were stimulated or promoted by the EVL protein were further enhanced by the RAD51B protein. These results strongly suggested that the EVL protein is a novel factor that activates RAD51-mediated recombination reactions, probably with the RAD51B protein. We anticipate that, in addition to its involvement in cytoplasmic actin dynamics, the EVL protein may be required in homologous recombination for repairing specific DNA lesions, and it may cause tumor malignancy by inappropriate recombination enhanced by EVL overexpression in certain types of tumor cells.     

CP12 from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, a Permanent Specific ��Chaperone-like�� Protein of Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate Dehydrogenase

A new role is reported for CP12, a highly unfolded and flexible protein, mainly known for its redox function with A₄ glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). Both reduced and oxidized CP12 can prevent the in vitro thermal inactivation and aggregation of GAPDH from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. This mechanism is thus not redox-dependent. The protection is specific to CP12, because other proteins, such as bovine serum albumin, thioredoxin, and a general chaperone, Hsp33, do not fully prevent denaturation of GAPDH. Furthermore, CP12 acts as a specific chaperone, since it does not protect other proteins, such as catalase, alcohol dehydrogenase, or lysozyme. The interaction between CP12 and GAPDH is necessary to prevent the aggregation and inactivation, since the mutant C66S that does not form any complex with GAPDH cannot accomplish this protection. Unlike the C66S mutant, the C23S mutant that lacks the N-terminal bridge is partially able to protect and to slow down the inactivation and aggregation. Tryptic digestion coupled to mass spectrometry confirmed that the S-loop of GAPDH is the interaction site with CP12. Thus, CP12 not only has a redox function but also behaves as a specific “chaperone-like protein” for GAPDH, although a stable and not transitory interaction is observed. This new function of CP12 may explain why it is also present in complexes involving A₂B₂ GAPDHs that possess a regulatory C-terminal extension (GapB subunit) and therefore do not require CP12 to be redox-regulated.CP12 is a small 8.2-kDa protein present in the chloroplasts of most photosynthetic organisms, including cyanobacteria (1, 2), higher plants (3), the diatom Asterionella formosa (4, 5), and green (1) and red algae (6). It allows the formation of a supramolecular complex between phosphoribulokinase (EC 2.7.1.19) and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH),³ two key enzymes of the Calvin cycle pathway, and was recently shown to interact with fructose bisphosphate aldolase, another enzyme of the Calvin cycle pathway (7). The phosphoribulokinase·GAPDH·CP12 complex has been extensively studied in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (8, 9) and in Arabidopsis thaliana (10, 11). In the green alga C. reinhardtii, the interaction between CP12 and GAPDH is strong (8). GAPDH may exist as a homotetramer composed of four GapA subunits (A₄) in higher plants, cyanobacteria, and green and red algae (6, 12), but in higher plants, it can also exist as a heterotetramer (A₂B₂), composed of two subunits, GapA and GapB (13, 14). GapB, up to now, has exclusively been found in Streptophyta, but recently two prasinophycean green algae, Ostreococcus tauri and Ostreococcus lucimarinus, were also shown to possess a GapB gene, whereas CP12 is missing (15). The GapB subunit is similar to the GapA subunit but has a C-terminal extension containing two redox-regulated cysteine residues (16). Thus, although the A₄ GAPDHs lack these regulatory cysteine residues (13, 14, 17–20), they are also redox-regulated through its interaction with CP12, since the C terminus of this small protein resembles the C-terminal extension of the GapB subunit. The regulatory cysteine residues for GapA are thus supplied by CP12, as is well documented in the literature (1, 8, 11, 16).CP12 belongs to the family of intrinsically unstructured proteins (IUPs) (21–26). The amino acid composition of these proteins causes them to have no or few secondary structures. Their total or partial lack of structure and their high flexibility allow them to be molecular adaptors (27, 28). They are often able to bind to several partners and are involved in most cellular functions (29, 30). Recently, some IUPs have been described in photosynthetic organisms (31, 32).There are many functional categories of IUPs (22, 33). They can be, for instance, involved in permanent binding and have (i) a scavenger role, neutralizing or storing small ligands; (ii) an assembler role by forming complexes; and (iii) an effector role by modulating the activity of a partner molecule (33). These functions are not exclusive; thus, CP12 can form a stable complex with GAPDH, regulating its redox properties (8, 34, 35), and can also bind a metal ion (36, 37). IUPs can also bind transiently to partners, and some of them have been found to possess a chaperone activity (31, 38). This chaperone function was first shown for α-synuclein (39) and for α-casein (40), which are fully disordered. The amino acid composition of IUPs is less hydrophobic than those of soluble proteins; hence, they lack hydrophobic cores and do not become insoluble when heated. Since CP12 belongs to this family, we tested if it was resistant to heat treatment and finally, since it is tightly bound to GAPDH, if it could prevent aggregation of its partner, GAPDH, an enzyme well known for its tendency to aggregate (41–44) and consequently a substrate commonly used in chaperone studies (45, 46).Unlike chaperones, which form transient, dynamic complexes with their protein substrates through hydrophobic interactions (47, 48), CP12 forms a stable complex with GAPDH. The interaction involves the C-terminal part of the protein and the presence of negatively charged residues on CP12 (35). However, only a site-directed mutagenesis has been performed to characterize the interaction site on GAPDH. Although the mutation could have an indirect effect, the residue Arg-197 was shown to be a good candidate for the interaction site (49).In this report, we accordingly used proteolysis experiments coupled with mass spectrometry to detect which regions of GAPDH are protected by its association with CP12. To conclude, the aim of this report was to characterize a chaperone function of CP12 that had never been described before and to map the interaction site on GAPDH using an approach that does not involve site-directed mutagenesis.     

Phosphorylation of p53 Is Regulated by TPX2-Aurora A in Xenopus Oocytes

p53 is an important tumor suppressor regulating the cell cycle at multiple stages in higher vertebrates. The p53 gene is frequently deleted or mutated in human cancers, resulting in loss of p53 activity. This leads to centrosome amplification, aneuploidy, and tumorigenesis, three phenotypes also observed after overexpression of the oncogenic kinase Aurora A. Accordingly, recent studies have focused on the relationship between these two proteins. p53 and Aurora A have been reported to interact in mammalian cells, but the function of this interaction remains unclear. We recently reported that Xenopus p53 can inhibit Aurora A activity in vitro but only in the absence of TPX2. Here we investigate the interplay between Xenopus Aurora A, TPX2, and p53 and show that newly synthesized TPX2 is required for nearly all Aurora A activation and for full p53 synthesis and phosphorylation in vivo during oocyte maturation. In vitro, phosphorylation mediated by Aurora A targets serines 129 and 190 within the DNA binding domain of p53. Glutathione S-transferase pull-down studies indicate that the interaction occurs via the p53 transactivation domain and the Aurora A catalytic domain around the T-loop. Our studies suggest that targeting of TPX2 might be an effective strategy for specifically inhibiting the phosphorylation of Aurora A substrates, including p53.Aurora A is an oncogenic protein kinase that is active in mitosis and plays important roles in spindle assembly and centrosome function (1). Overexpression of either human or Xenopus Aurora A transforms mammalian cells, but only when the p53 pathway is altered (2–4). Aurora A is localized on centrosomes during mitosis, and overexpression of the protein leads to centrosome amplification and aneuploidy (2, 3, 5, 6), two likely contributors to genomic instability (7, 8). Because of its oncogenic potential and amplification in human tumors, considerable attention has been focused on the mechanism of Aurora A activation in mitosis. Evidence from several laboratories indicates that activation occurs as a result of phosphorylation of a threonine residue in the T-loop of the kinase (4, 9, 10). Purification of Aurora A-activating activity from M phase Xenopus egg extracts led to an apparent activation mechanism in which autophosphorylation at the T-loop is stimulated by binding of the targeting protein for Xklp2 (TPX2) (11–14). On the other hand, it has been shown that Aurora A activity can be inhibited by interaction with several proteins, including PP1 (protein phosphatase 1), AIP (Aurora A kinase-interacting protein), and, more recently, p53 (9, 15–17).p53 is a well known tumor suppressor able to drive cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, or senescence when DNA is damaged or cell integrity is threatened (18, 19). In human cancers, the p53 gene is frequently deleted or mutated, leading to inactivation of p53 functions (20). p53 protein is almost undetectable in “normal cells,” mainly due to its instability. Indeed, during a normal cell cycle, p53 associates with Mdm2 in the nucleus and thereafter undergoes nuclear exclusion, allowing its ubiquitination and subsequent degradation (21). In cells under stress, p53 is stabilized through the disruption of its interaction with Mdm2 (21), leading to p53 accumulation in the nucleus and triggering different responses, as described above.Although p53 has mostly been characterized as a nuclear protein, it has also been shown to localize on centrosomes (22–24) and regulate centrosome duplication (23, 24). Centrosomes are believed to act as scaffolds that concentrate many regulatory molecules involved in signal transduction, including multiple protein kinases (25). Thus, centrosomal localization of p53 might be important for its own regulation by phosphorylation/dephosphorylation, and one of its regulators could be the mitotic kinase Aurora A. Indeed, phenotypes associated with the misexpression of these two proteins are very similar. For example, overexpression of Aurora A kinase leads to centrosome amplification, aneuploidy, and tumorigenesis, and the same effects are often observed after down-regulation of p53 transactivation activity or deletion/mutation of its gene (26, 27).Several recent studies performed in mammalian models show interplay between p53 and Aurora A, with each protein having the ability to inhibit the other, depending on the stage of the cell cycle and the stress level of the cell (17, 28, 29). These studies reported that p53 is a substrate of Aurora A, and serines 215 and 315 were demonstrated to be the two major Aurora A phosphorylation sites in human p53 in vitro and in vivo. Phosphorylation of Ser-215 within the DNA binding domain of human p53 inhibited both p53 DNA binding and transactivation activities (29). Recently, our group showed that Xenopus p53 is able to inhibit Aurora A kinase activity in vitro, but this inhibitory effect can be suppressed by prior binding of Aurora A to TPX2 (9). Contrary to somatic cells, where p53 is nuclear, unstable, and expressed at a very low level, p53 is highly expressed in the cytoplasm of Xenopus oocytes and stable until later stages of development (30, 31). The high concentration of both p53 and Aurora A in the oocyte provided a suitable basis for investigating p53-Aurora A interaction and also evaluating Xenopus p53 as a substrate of Aurora A.     

Loss of PINK1 Function Promotes Mitophagy through Effects on Oxidative Stress and Mitochondrial Fission

Mitochondrial dysregulation is strongly implicated in Parkinson disease. Mutations in PTEN-induced kinase 1 (PINK1) are associated with familial parkinsonism and neuropsychiatric disorders. Although overexpressed PINK1 is neuroprotective, less is known about neuronal responses to loss of PINK1 function. We found that stable knockdown of PINK1 induced mitochondrial fragmentation and autophagy in SH-SY5Y cells, which was reversed by the reintroduction of an RNA interference (RNAi)-resistant plasmid for PINK1. Moreover, stable or transient overexpression of wild-type PINK1 increased mitochondrial interconnectivity and suppressed toxin-induced autophagy/mitophagy. Mitochondrial oxidant production played an essential role in triggering mitochondrial fragmentation and autophagy in PINK1 shRNA lines. Autophagy/mitophagy served a protective role in limiting cell death, and overexpressing Parkin further enhanced this protective mitophagic response. The dominant negative Drp1 mutant inhibited both fission and mitophagy in PINK1-deficient cells. Interestingly, RNAi knockdown of autophagy proteins Atg7 and LC3/Atg8 also decreased mitochondrial fragmentation without affecting oxidative stress, suggesting active involvement of autophagy in morphologic remodeling of mitochondria for clearance. To summarize, loss of PINK1 function elicits oxidative stress and mitochondrial turnover coordinated by the autophagic and fission/fusion machineries. Furthermore, PINK1 and Parkin may cooperate through different mechanisms to maintain mitochondrial homeostasis.Parkinson disease is an age-related neurodegenerative disease that affects ∼1% of the population worldwide. The causes of sporadic cases are unknown, although mitochondrial or oxidative toxins such as 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium, 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA),³ and rotenone reproduce features of the disease in animal and cell culture models (1). Abnormalities in mitochondrial respiration and increased oxidative stress are observed in cells and tissues from parkinsonian patients (2, 3), which also exhibit increased mitochondrial autophagy (4). Furthermore, mutations in parkinsonian genes affect oxidative stress response pathways and mitochondrial homeostasis (5). Thus, disruption of mitochondrial homeostasis represents a major factor implicated in the pathogenesis of sporadic and inherited parkinsonian disorders (PD).The PARK6 locus involved in autosomal recessive and early-onset PD encodes for PTEN-induced kinase 1 (PINK1) (6, 7). PINK1 is a cytosolic and mitochondrially localized 581-amino acid serine/threonine kinase that possesses an N-terminal mitochondrial targeting sequence (6, 8). The primary sequence also includes a putative transmembrane domain important for orientation of the PINK1 domain (8), a conserved kinase domain homologous to calcium calmodulin kinases, and a C-terminal domain that regulates autophosphorylation activity (9, 10). Overexpression of wild-type PINK1, but not its PD-associated mutants, protects against several toxic insults in neuronal cells (6, 11, 12). Mitochondrial targeting is necessary for some (13) but not all of the neuroprotective effects of PINK1 (14), implicating involvement of cytoplasmic targets that modulate mitochondrial pathobiology (8). PINK1 catalytic activity is necessary for its neuroprotective role, because a kinase-deficient K219M substitution in the ATP binding pocket of PINK1 abrogates its ability to protect neurons (14). Although PINK1 mutations do not seem to impair mitochondrial targeting, PD-associated mutations differentially destabilize the protein, resulting in loss of neuroprotective activities (13, 15).Recent studies indicate that PINK1 and Parkin interact genetically (3, 16-18) to prevent oxidative stress (19, 20) and regulate mitochondrial morphology (21). Primary cells derived from PINK1 mutant patients exhibit mitochondrial fragmentation with disorganized cristae, recapitulated by RNA interference studies in HeLa cells (3).Mitochondria are degraded by macroautophagy, a process involving sequestration of cytoplasmic cargo into membranous autophagic vacuoles (AVs) for delivery to lysosomes (22, 23). Interestingly, mitochondrial fission accompanies autophagic neurodegeneration elicited by the PD neurotoxin 6-OHDA (24, 25). Moreover, mitochondrial fragmentation and increased autophagy are observed in neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer and Parkinson diseases (4, 26-28). Although inclusion of mitochondria in autophagosomes was once believed to be a random process, as observed during starvation, studies involving hypoxia, mitochondrial damage, apoptotic stimuli, or limiting amounts of aerobic substrates in facultative anaerobes support the concept of selective mitochondrial autophagy (mitophagy) (29, 30). In particular, mitochondrially localized kinases may play an important role in models involving oxidative mitochondrial injury (25, 31, 32).Autophagy is involved in the clearance of protein aggregates (33-35) and normal regulation of axonal-synaptic morphology (36). Chronic disruption of lysosomal function results in accumulation of subtly impaired mitochondria with decreased calcium buffering capacity (37), implicating an important role for autophagy in mitochondrial homeostasis (37, 38). Recently, Parkin, which complements the effects of PINK1 deficiency on mitochondrial morphology (3), was found to promote autophagy of depolarized mitochondria (39). Conversely, Beclin 1-independent autophagy/mitophagy contributes to cell death elicited by the PD toxins 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium and 6-OHDA (25, 28, 31, 32), causing neurite retraction in cells expressing a PD-linked mutation in leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (40). Whereas properly regulated autophagy plays a homeostatic and neuroprotective role, excessive or incomplete autophagy creates a condition of “autophagic stress” that can contribute to neurodegeneration (28).As mitochondrial fragmentation (3) and increased mitochondrial autophagy (4) have been described in human cells or tissues of PD patients, we investigated whether or not the engineered loss of PINK1 function could recapitulate these observations in human neuronal cells (SH-SY5Y). Stable knockdown of endogenous PINK1 gave rise to mitochondrial fragmentation and increased autophagy and mitophagy, whereas stable or transient overexpression of PINK1 had the opposite effect. Autophagy/mitophagy was dependent upon increased mitochondrial oxidant production and activation of fission. The data indicate that PINK1 is important for the maintenance of mitochondrial networks, suggesting that coordinated regulation of mitochondrial dynamics and autophagy limits cell death associated with loss of PINK1 function.     

Bortezomib Overcomes Tumor Necrosis Factor-related Apoptosis-inducing Ligand Resistance in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells in Part through the Inhibition of the Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/Akt Pathway

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common and aggressive human malignancies. Recombinant tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) is a promising anti-tumor agent. However, many HCC cells show resistance to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. In this study, we showed that bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, overcame TRAIL resistance in HCC cells, including Huh-7, Hep3B, and Sk-Hep1. The combination of bortezomib and TRAIL restored the sensitivity of HCC cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Comparing the molecular change in HCC cells treated with these agents, we found that down-regulation of phospho-Akt (P-Akt) played a key role in mediating TRAIL sensitization of bortezomib. The first evidence was that bortezomib down-regulated P-Akt in a dose- and time-dependent manner in TRAIL-treated HCC cells. Second, {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"LY294002","term_id":"1257998346","term_text":"LY294002"}}LY294002, a PI3K inhibitor, also sensitized resistant HCC cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Third, knocking down Akt1 by small interference RNA also enhanced TRAIL-induced apoptosis in Huh-7 cells. Finally, ectopic expression of mutant Akt (constitutive active) in HCC cells abolished TRAIL sensitization effect of bortezomib. Moreover, okadaic acid, a protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) inhibitor, reversed down-regulation of P-Akt in bortezomib-treated cells, and PP2A knockdown by small interference RNA also reduced apoptosis induced by the combination of TRAIL and bortezomib, indicating that PP2A may be important in mediating the effect of bortezomib on TRAIL sensitization. Together, bortezomib overcame TRAIL resistance at clinically achievable concentrations in hepatocellular carcinoma cells, and this effect is mediated at least partly via inhibition of the PI3K/Akt pathway.Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)² is currently the fifth most common solid tumor worldwide and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death. To date, surgery is still the only curative treatment but is only feasible in a small portion of patients (1). Drug treatment is the major therapy for patients with advanced stage disease. Unfortunately, the response rate to traditional chemotherapy for HCC patients is unsatisfactory (1). Novel pharmacological therapy is urgently needed for patients with advanced HCC. In this regard, the approval of sorafenib might open a new era of molecularly targeted therapy in the treatment of HCC patients.Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), a type II transmembrane protein and a member of the TNF family, is a promising anti-tumor agent under clinical investigation (2). TRAIL functions by engaging its receptors expressed on the surface of target cells. Five receptors specific for TRAIL have been identified, including DR4/TRAIL-R1, DR5/TRAIL-R2, DcR1, DcR2, and osteoprotegerin. Among TRAIL receptors, only DR4 and DR5 contain an effective death domain that is essential to formation of death-inducing signaling complex (DISC), a critical step for TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Notably, the trimerization of the death domains recruits an adaptor molecule, Fas-associated protein with death domain (FADD), which subsequently recruits and activates caspase-8. In type I cells, activation of caspase-8 is sufficient to activate caspase-3 to induce apoptosis; however, in another type of cells (type II), the intrinsic mitochondrial pathway is essential for apoptosis characterized by cleavage of Bid and release of cytochrome c from mitochondria, which subsequently activates caspase-9 and caspase-3 (3).Although TRAIL induces apoptosis in malignant cells but sparing normal cells, some tumor cells are resistant to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Mechanisms responsible for the resistance include receptors and intracellular resistance. Although the cell surface expression of DR4 or DR5 is absolutely required for TRAIL-induced apoptosis, tumor cells expressing these death receptors are not always sensitive to TRAIL due to intracellular mechanisms. For example, the cellular FLICE-inhibitory protein (c-FLIP), a homologue to caspase-8 but without protease activity, has been linked to TRAIL resistance in several studies (4, 5). In addition, inactivation of Bax, a proapoptotic Bcl-2 family protein, resulted in resistance to TRAIL in MMR-deficient tumors (6, 7), and reintroduction of Bax into Bax-deficient cells restored TRAIL sensitivity (8), indicating that the Bcl-2 family plays a critical role in intracellular mechanisms for resistance of TRAIL.Bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor approved clinically for multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma, has been investigated intensively for many types of cancer (9). Accumulating studies indicate that the combination of bortezomib and TRAIL overcomes the resistance to TRAIL in various types of cancer, including acute myeloid leukemia (4), lymphoma (10–13), prostate (14–17), colon (15, 18, 19), bladder (14, 16), renal cell carcinoma (20), thyroid (21), ovary (22), non-small cell lung (23, 24), sarcoma (25), and HCC (26, 27). Molecular targets responsible for the sensitizing effect of bortezomib on TRAIL-induced cell death include DR4 (14, 27), DR5 (14, 20, 22–23, 28), c-FLIP (4, 11, 21–23, 29), NF-κB (12, 24, 30), p21 (16, 21, 25), and p27 (25). In addition, Bcl-2 family also plays a role in the combinational effect of bortezomib and TRAIL, including Bcl-2 (10, 21), Bax (13, 22), Bak (27), Bcl-xL (21), Bik (18), and Bim (15).Recently, we have reported that Akt signaling is a major molecular determinant in bortezomib-induced apoptosis in HCC cells (31). In this study, we demonstrated that bortezomib overcame TRAIL resistance in HCC cells through inhibition of the PI3K/Akt pathway.     

Sgt1 Dimerization Is Required for Yeast Kinetochore Assembly

The kinetochore, which consists of DNA sequence elements and structural proteins, is essential for high-fidelity chromosome transmission during cell division. In budding yeast, Sgt1 and Hsp90 help assemble the core kinetochore complex CBF3 by activating the CBF3 components Skp1 and Ctf13. In this study, we show that Sgt1 forms homodimers by performing in vitro and in vivo immunoprecipitation and analytical ultracentrifugation analyses. Analyses of the dimerization of Sgt1 deletion proteins showed that the Skp1-binding domain (amino acids 1–211) contains the Sgt1 homodimerization domain. Also, the Sgt1 mutant proteins that were unable to dimerize also did not bind Skp1, suggesting that Sgt1 dimerization is important for Sgt1-Skp1 binding. Restoring dimerization activity of a dimerization-deficient sgt1 mutant (sgt1-L31P) by using the CENP-B (centromere protein-B) dimerization domain suppressed the temperature sensitivity, the benomyl sensitivity, and the chromosome missegregation phenotype of sgt1-L31P. These results strongly suggest that Sgt1 dimerization is required for kinetochore assembly.Spindle microtubules are coupled to the centromeric region of the chromosome by a structural protein complex called the kinetochore (1, 2). The kinetochore is thought to generate a signal that arrests cells during mitosis when it is not properly attached to microtubules, thereby preventing aberrant chromosome transmission to the daughter cells, which can lead to tumorigenesis (3, 4). The kinetochore of the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been characterized thoroughly, genetically and biochemically; thus, its molecular structure is the most well detailed to date. More than 70 different proteins comprise the budding yeast kinetochore, and several of those are conserved in mammals (2).The budding yeast centromere DNA is a 125-bp region that contains three conserved regions, CDEI, CDEII, and CDEIII (5, 6). CDEI is bound by Cbf1 (7–9). CDEIII (25 bp) is essential for centromere function (10) and is the site where CBF3 binds to centromeric DNA. CBF3 contains four proteins: Ndc10, Cep3, Ctf13 (11–18), and Skp1 (17, 18), all of which are essential for viability. Mutations in any of the four CBF3 proteins abolish the ability of CDEIII to bind to CBF3 (19, 20). All of the described kinetochore proteins, except the CDEI-binding Cbf1, localize to kinetochores dependent on the CBF3 complex (2). Therefore, the CBF3 complex is the fundamental structure of the kinetochore, and the mechanism of CBF3 assembly is of major interest.We previously isolated SGT1, the skp1-4 kinetochore-defective mutant dosage suppressor (21). Sgt1 and Skp1 activate Ctf13; thus, they are required for assembly of the CBF3 complex (21). The molecular chaperone Hsp90 is also required for the formation of the Skp1-Ctf13 complex (22). Sgt1 has two highly conserved motifs that are required for protein-protein interaction, the tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR)² (21) and the CS (CHORD protein- and Sgt1-specific) motif. We and others (23–26) have found that both domains are important for the interaction with Hsp90. The Sgt1-Hsp90 interaction is required for the assembly of the core kinetochore complex; this interaction is an initial step in kinetochore assembly (24, 26, 27) that is conserved between yeast and humans (28, 29).In this study, we further characterized the molecular mechanism of this assembly process. We found that Sgt1 forms dimers in vivo, and our results strongly suggest that Sgt1 dimerization is required for kinetochore assembly in budding yeast.     

Mechanism of Sustained Activation of Ribosomal S6 Kinase (RSK) and ERK by Kaposi Sarcoma-associated Herpesvirus ORF45: MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEXES RETAIN ACTIVE PHOSPHORYLATED ERK AND RSK AND PROTECT THEM FROM DEPHOSPHORYLATION*

As obligate intracellular parasites, viruses exploit diverse cellular signaling machineries, including the mitogen-activated protein-kinase pathway, during their infections. We have demonstrated previously that the open reading frame 45 (ORF45) of Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus interacts with p90 ribosomal S6 kinases (RSKs) and strongly stimulates their kinase activities (Kuang, E., Tang, Q., Maul, G. G., and Zhu, F. (2008) J. Virol. 82 ,1838 -1850). Here, we define the mechanism by which ORF45 activates RSKs. We demonstrated that binding of ORF45 to RSK increases the association of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) with RSK, such that ORF45, RSK, and ERK formed high molecular mass protein complexes. We further demonstrated that the complexes shielded active pERK and pRSK from dephosphorylation. As a result, the complex-associated RSK and ERK were activated and sustained at high levels. Finally, we provide evidence that this mechanism contributes to the sustained activation of ERK and RSK in Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus lytic replication.The extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)² mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway has been implicated in diverse cellular physiological processes including proliferation, survival, growth, differentiation, and motility (1-4) and is also exploited by a variety of viruses such as Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV), human cytomegalovirus, human immunodeficiency virus, respiratory syncytial virus, hepatitis B virus, coxsackie, vaccinia, coronavirus, and influenza virus (5-17). The MAPK kinases relay the extracellular signaling through sequential phosphorylation to an array of cytoplasmic and nuclear substrates to elicit specific responses (1, 2, 18). Phosphorylation of MAPK is reversible. The kinetics of deactivation or duration of signaling dictates diverse biological outcomes (19, 20). For example, sustained but not transient activation of ERK signaling induces the differentiation of PC12 cells into sympathetic-like neurons and transformation of NIH3T3 cells (20-22). During viral infection, a unique biphasic ERK activation has been observed for some viruses (an early transient activation triggered by viral binding or entry and a late sustained activation correlated with viral gene expression), but the responsible viral factors and underlying mechanism for the sustained ERK activation remain largely unknown (5, 8, 13, 23).The p90 ribosomal S6 kinases (RSKs) are a family of serine/threonine kinases that lie at the terminus of the ERK pathway (1, 24-26). In mammals, four isoforms are known, RSK1 to RSK4. Each one has two catalytically functional kinase domains, the N-terminal kinase domain (NTKD) and C-terminal kinase domain (CTKD) as well as a linker region between the two. The NTKD is responsible for phosphorylation of exogenous substrates, and the CTKD and linker region regulate RSK activation (1, 24, 25). In quiescent cells ERK binds to the docking site in the C terminus of RSK (27-29). Upon mitogen stimulation, ERK is activated by its upstream MAPK/ERK kinase (MEK). The active ERK phosphorylates Thr-359/Ser-363 of RSK in the linker region (amino acid numbers refer to human RSK1) and Thr-573 in the CTKD activation loop. The activated CTKD then phosphorylates Ser-380 in the linker region, creating a docking site for 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1. The 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1 phosphorylates Ser-221 of RSK in the activation loop and activates the NTKD. The activated NTKD autophosphorylates the serine residue near the ERK docking site, causing a transient dissociation of active ERK from RSK (25, 26, 28). The stimulation of quiescent cells by a mitogen such as epidermal growth factor or a phorbol ester such as 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) usually results in a transient RSK activation that lasts less than 30 min. RSKs have been implicated in regulating cell survival, growth, and proliferation. Mutation or aberrant expression of RSK has been implicated in several human diseases including Coffin-Lowry syndrome and prostate and breast cancers (1, 24, 25, 30-32).KSHV is a human DNA tumor virus etiologically linked to Kaposi sarcoma, primary effusion lymphoma, and a subset of multicentric Castleman disease (33, 34). Infection and reactivation of KSHV activate multiple MAPK pathways (6, 12, 35). Noticeably, the ERK/RSK activation is sustained late during KSHV primary infection and reactivation from latency (5, 6, 12, 23), but the mechanism of the sustained ERK/RSK activation is unclear. Recently, we demonstrated that ORF45, an immediate early and also virion tegument protein of KSHV, interacts with RSK1 and RSK2 and strongly stimulates their kinase activities (23). We also demonstrated that the activation of RSK plays an essential role in KSHV lytic replication (23). In the present study we determined the mechanism of ORF45-induced sustained ERK/RSK activation. We found that ORF45 increases the association of RSK with ERK and protects them from dephosphorylation, causing sustained activation of both ERK and RSK.     

The Mei5-Sae3 Protein Complex Mediates Dmc1 Activity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

During homologous recombination, a number of proteins cooperate to catalyze the loading of recombinases onto single-stranded DNA. Single-stranded DNA-binding proteins stimulate recombination by coating single-stranded DNA and keeping it free of secondary structure; however, in order for recombinases to load on single-stranded-DNA-binding protein-coated DNA, the activity of a class of proteins known as recombination mediators is required. Mediator proteins coordinate the handoff of single-stranded DNA from single-stranded DNA-binding protein to recombinase. Here we show that a complex of Mei5 and Sae3 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae preferentially binds single-stranded DNA and relieves the inhibition of the strand assimilation and DNA binding abilities of the meiotic recombinase Dmc1 imposed by the single-stranded DNA-binding protein replication protein A. Additionally, we demonstrate the physical interaction of Mei5-Sae3 with replication protein A. Our results, together with previous in vivo studies, indicate that Mei5-Sae3 is a mediator of Dmc1 assembly during meiotic recombination in S. cerevisiae.During meiosis, recombination between homologous chromosomes ensures proper segregation into haploid products. Recombination events are initiated by the formation of double strand breaks (DSBs)² in DNA (1). This is followed by resection of free DNA ends to yield 3′ single-stranded tails, upon which recombinase assembles to form nucleoprotein filaments. Following recombinase assembly, the nucleoprotein filament engages a donor chromatid, searches for homologous DNA sequences on that chromatid, and promotes strand exchange to yield a heteroduplex DNA intermediate often referred to as a joint molecule. Although recombinase alone is capable of promoting homology search and strand exchange in vitro, genetic and biochemical studies have demonstrated that normal recombinase function in vivo requires the activity of a number of accessory factors (2). These factors enhance the assembly of nucleoprotein filaments, target capture, homology search, and dissociation of recombinase from duplex DNA.Most eukaryotes possess two recombinases, both homologues of the Escherichia coli recombinase RecA: Rad51, which is the major recombinase in mitotic cells and is also important during meiotic recombination, and Dmc1, which functions only in meiosis. Dmc1 and Rad51 have been shown to assemble at DSBs by immunofluorescence and chromatin immunoprecipitation (3–6), and both proteins oligomerize on single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) to form nucleofilaments that catalyze strand invasion (7–9).A number of biochemical studies have defined the role of accessory factors in stimulating the activity of Rad51 (10–12). Replication protein A (RPA), the yeast ssDNA-binding protein (SSB), removes secondary structure in ssDNA that otherwise prevents formation of fully functional nucleoprotein filaments (13). Both Rad52 protein (11, 12) and the heterodimeric protein Rad55/Rad57 (14) can overcome the inhibitory effect of RPA on Rad51 nucleoprotein filament formation in purified systems, mediating a handoff between RPA and Rad51. It is thought that the mechanism for the mediator activity of Rad52 involves Rad52 recognizing and binding to RPA-coated ssDNA, where it provides nucleation sites for the recruitment of free molecules of Rad51 (15). The tumor suppressor protein BRCA2 also serves as an assembly factor for Rad51 during mitosis in a variety of species that encode orthologues of this protein, including mice (16), corn smut (17), and humans (18).The meiosis-specific recombinase Dmc1 is stimulated by a distinct set of accessory factors. Immunostaining studies suggest that the Rad51 mediators Rad52 and Rad55/Rad57 are not required for assembly of Dmc1 foci in vivo, although Rad51 itself promotes Dmc1 foci (19–21). More recently, immunostaining and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated a role for the Mei5 and Sae3 proteins of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in assembly of Dmc1 at sites of DSBs in vivo (22, 23). Consistent with these observations, mei5 and sae3 mutants display markedly similar meiotic defects as compared with dmc1 mutants, including defects in sporulation, spore viability, crossing over, DSB repair, progression through meiosis, and synaptonemal complex formation (19, 22–24). Finally, the three proteins have been shown to physically interact; Mei5 and Sae3 have been co-purified and co-immunoprecipitated, and an N-terminal portion of Mei5 has been shown to interact with Dmc1 in a two-hybrid assay (22).The fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe encodes two proteins, Swi5 and Sfr1, which share sequence homology with Sae3 and Mei5, respectively (22). Swi5 and Sfr1 have been shown to stimulate the strand exchange activity of Rhp51 (the S. pombe Rad51 homologue) and Dmc1 (25). Although some results indicate functional similarity of Swi5-Sfr1 and Mei5-Sae3, there are also clear differences. The Mei5-Sae3 complex of budding yeast is expressed solely during meiosis, and no mitotic phenotypes have been reported for mei5 or sae3 mutants (22, 24, 26). In contrast, the Swi5-Sfr1 complex of fission yeast is expressed in mitotic and meiotic cells, and mutations in SWI5 have been shown to cause defects in mitotic recombination (27). Furthermore, although mei5 and sae3 mutants are phenotypically similar to dmc1 mutants, swi5 and sfr1 mutants display more severe meiotic defects during fission yeast meiosis than do dmc1 mutants (27–29). These data suggest that although Swi5-Sfr1 clearly contributes to Rad51 activity in fission yeast, it is possible that the activity of Mei5-Sae3 is restricted to stimulating Dmc1 in budding yeast.In this study, a biochemical approach is used to test the budding yeast Mei5-Sae3 complex for properties expected of a recombinase assembly mediator. We show that Mei5-Sae3 binds both ssDNA and double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) but binds ssDNA preferentially. We also show that Mei5-Sae3 can overcome the inhibitory effects of RPA on the ssDNA binding and strand assimilation activities of Dmc1. Finally, we show that Mei5-Sae3 and RPA bind one another directly. These results indicate that Mei5-Sae3 acts directly as a mediator protein for assembly of Dmc1.