Evidence for a New Avian Paramyxovirus Serotype 10 Detected in Rockhopper Penguins from the Falkland Islands

The biological, serological, and genomic characterization of a paramyxovirus recently isolated from rockhopper penguins (Eudyptes chrysocome) suggested that this virus represented a new avian paramyxovirus (APMV) group, APMV10. This penguin virus resembled other APMVs by electron microscopy; however, its viral hemagglutination (HA) activity was not inhibited by antisera against any of the nine defined APMV serotypes. In addition, antiserum generated against this penguin virus did not inhibit the HA of representative viruses of the other APMV serotypes. Sequence data produced using random priming methods revealed a genomic structure typical of APMV. Phylogenetic evaluation of coding regions revealed that amino acid sequences of all six proteins were most closely related to APMV2 and APMV8. The calculation of evolutionary distances among proteins and distances at the nucleotide level confirmed that APMV2, APMV8, and the penguin virus all were sufficiently divergent from each other to be considered different serotypes. We propose that this isolate, named APMV10/penguin/Falkland Islands/324/2007, be the prototype virus for APMV10. Because of the known problems associated with serology, such as antiserum cross-reactivity and one-way immunogenicity, in addition to the reliance on the immune response to a single protein, the hemagglutinin-neuraminidase, as the sole base for viral classification, we suggest the need for new classification guidelines that incorporate genome sequence comparisons.Viruses from the Paramyxoviridae family have caused disease in humans and animals for centuries. Over the last 40 years, many paramyxoviruses isolated from animals and people have been newly described (16, 17, 22, 29, 31, 32, 36, 42, 44, 46, 49, 58, 59, 62-64). Viruses from this family are pleomorphic, enveloped, single-stranded, nonsegmented, negative-sense RNA viruses that demonstrate serological cross-reactivity with other paramyxoviruses related to them (30, 46). The subfamily Paramyxovirinae is divided into five genera: Respirovirus, Morbillivirus, Rubulavirus, Henipavirus, and Avulavirus (30). The Avulavirus genus contains nine distinct avian paramyxovirus (APMV) serotypes (Table ​(Table1),1), and information on the discovery of each has been reported elsewhere (4, 6, 7, 9, 12, 34, 41, 50, 51, 60, 68).

TABLE 1.

Characteristics of prototype viruses APMV1 to APMV9 and the penguin virus

Comparative Analysis of Myxococcus Predation on Soil Bacteria

Predator-prey relationships among prokaryotes have received little attention but are likely to be important determinants of the composition, structure, and dynamics of microbial communities. Many species of the soil-dwelling myxobacteria are predators of other microbes, but their predation range is poorly characterized. To better understand the predatory capabilities of myxobacteria in nature, we analyzed the predation performance of numerous Myxococcus isolates across 12 diverse species of bacteria. All predator isolates could utilize most potential prey species to effectively fuel colony expansion, although one species hindered predator swarming relative to a control treatment with no growth substrate. Predator strains varied significantly in their relative performance across prey types, but most variation in predatory performance was determined by prey type, with Gram-negative prey species supporting more Myxococcus growth than Gram-positive species. There was evidence for specialized predator performance in some predator-prey combinations. Such specialization may reduce resource competition among sympatric strains in natural habitats. The broad prey range of the Myxococcus genus coupled with its ubiquity in the soil suggests that myxobacteria are likely to have very important ecological and evolutionary effects on many species of soil prokaryotes.Predation plays a major role in shaping both the ecology and evolution of biological communities. The population and evolutionary dynamics of predators and their prey are often tightly coupled and can greatly influence the dynamics of other organisms as well (1). Predation has been invoked as a major cause of diversity in ecosystems (11, 12). For example, predators may mediate coexistence between superior and inferior competitors (2, 13), and differential trajectories of predator-prey coevolution can lead to divergence between separate populations (70).Predation has been investigated extensively in higher organisms but relatively little among prokaryotes. Predation between prokaryotes is one of the most ancient forms of predation (27), and it has been proposed that this process may have been the origin of eukaryotic cells (16). Prokaryotes are key players in primary biomass production (44) and global nutrient cycling (22), and predation of some prokaryotes by others is likely to significantly affect these processes. Most studies of predatory prokaryotes have focused on Bdellovibrionaceae species (e.g., see references 51, 55, and 67). These small deltaproteobacteria prey on other Gram-negative cells, using flagella to swim rapidly until they collide with a prey cell. After collision, the predator cells then enter the periplasmic space of the prey cell, consume the host cell from within, elongate, and divide into new cells that are released upon host cell lysis (41). Although often described as predatory, the Bdellovibrionaceae may also be considered to be parasitic, as they typically depend (apart from host-independent strains that have been observed [60]) on the infection and death of their host for their reproduction (47).In this study, we examined predation among the myxobacteria, which are also deltaproteobacteria but constitute a monophyletic clade divergent from the Bdellovibrionaceae (17). Myxobacteria are found in most terrestrial soils and in many aquatic environments as well (17, 53, 74). Many myxobacteria, including the model species Myxococcus xanthus, exhibit several complex social traits, including fruiting body formation and spore formation (14, 18, 34, 62, 71), cooperative swarming with two motility systems (64, 87), and group (or “wolf pack”) predation on both bacteria and fungi (4, 5, 8, 9, 15, 50). Using representatives of the genus Myxococcus, we tested for both intra- and interspecific variation in myxobacterial predatory performance across a broad range of prey types. Moreover, we examined whether prey vary substantially in the degree to which they support predatory growth by the myxobacteria and whether patterns of variation in predator performance are constant or variable across prey environments. The latter outcome may reflect adaptive specialization and help to maintain diversity in natural populations (57, 59).Although closely related to the Bdellovibrionaceae (both are deltaproteobacteria), myxobacteria employ a highly divergent mode of predation. Myxobacteria use gliding motility (64) to search the soil matrix for prey and produce a wide range of antibiotics and lytic compounds that kill and decompose prey cells and break down complex polymers, thereby releasing substrates for growth (66). Myxobacterial predation is cooperative both in its “searching” component (6, 31, 82; for details on cooperative swarming, see reference 64) and in its “handling” component (10, 29, 31, 32), in which secreted enzymes turn prey cells into consumable growth substrates (56, 83). There is evidence that M. xanthus employs chemotaxis-like genes in its attack on prey cells (5) and that predation is stimulated by close contact with prey cells (48).Recent studies have revealed great genetic and phenotypic diversity within natural populations of M. xanthus, on both global (79) and local (down to centimeter) scales (78). Phenotypic diversity includes variation in social compatibility (24, 81), the density and nutrient thresholds triggering development (33, 38), developmental timing (38), motility rates and patterns (80), and secondary metabolite production (40). Although natural populations are spatially structured and both genetic diversity and population differentiation decrease with spatial scale (79), substantial genetic diversity is present even among centimeter-scale isolates (78). No study has yet systematically investigated quantitative natural variation in myxobacterial predation phenotypes across a large number of predator genotypes.Given the previous discovery of large variation in all examined phenotypes, even among genetically extremely similar strains, we anticipated extensive predatory variation as well. Using a phylogenetically broad range of prey, we compared and contrasted the predatory performance of 16 natural M. xanthus isolates, sampled from global to local scales, as well as the commonly studied laboratory reference strain DK1622 and representatives of three additional Myxococcus species: M. flavescens (86), M. macrosporus (42), and M. virescens (63) (Table ​(Table1).1). In particular, we measured myxobacterial swarm expansion rates on prey lawns spread on buffered agar (31, 50) and on control plates with no nutrients or with prehydrolyzed growth substrate.

TABLE 1.

List of myxobacteria used, with geographical origin

Arabidopsis LON2 Is Necessary for Peroxisomal Function and Sustained Matrix Protein Import

Relatively little is known about the small subset of peroxisomal proteins with predicted protease activity. Here, we report that the peroxisomal LON2 (At5g47040) protease facilitates matrix protein import into Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) peroxisomes. We identified T-DNA insertion alleles disrupted in five of the nine confirmed or predicted peroxisomal proteases and found only two—lon2 and deg15, a mutant defective in the previously described PTS2-processing protease (DEG15/At1g28320)—with phenotypes suggestive of peroxisome metabolism defects. Both lon2 and deg15 mutants were mildly resistant to the inhibitory effects of indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) on root elongation, but only lon2 mutants were resistant to the stimulatory effects of IBA on lateral root production or displayed Suc dependence during seedling growth. lon2 mutants displayed defects in removing the type 2 peroxisome targeting signal (PTS2) from peroxisomal malate dehydrogenase and reduced accumulation of 3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase, another PTS2-containing protein; both defects were not apparent upon germination but appeared in 5- to 8-d-old seedlings. In lon2 cotyledon cells, matrix proteins were localized to peroxisomes in 4-d-old seedlings but mislocalized to the cytosol in 8-d-old seedlings. Moreover, a PTS2-GFP reporter sorted to peroxisomes in lon2 root tip cells but was largely cytosolic in more mature root cells. Our results indicate that LON2 is needed for sustained matrix protein import into peroxisomes. The delayed onset of matrix protein sorting defects may account for the relatively weak Suc dependence following germination, moderate IBA-resistant primary root elongation, and severe defects in IBA-induced lateral root formation observed in lon2 mutants.Peroxisomes are single-membrane-bound organelles found in most eukaryotes. Peroxin (PEX) proteins are necessary for various aspects of peroxisome biogenesis, including matrix protein import (for review, see Distel et al., 1996; Schrader and Fahimi, 2008). Most matrix proteins are imported into peroxisomes from the cytosol using one of two targeting signals, a C-terminal type 1 peroxisome-targeting signal (PTS1) or a cleavable N-terminal type 2 peroxisome-targeting signal (PTS2) (Reumann, 2004). PTS1- and PTS2-containing proteins are bound in the cytosol by soluble matrix protein receptors, escorted to the peroxisome membrane docking complex, and translocated into the peroxisome matrix (for review, see Platta and Erdmann, 2007). Once in the peroxisome, many matrix proteins participate in metabolic pathways, such as β-oxidation, hydrogen peroxide decomposition, and photorespiration (for review, see Gabaldon et al., 2006; Poirier et al., 2006).In addition to metabolic enzymes, several proteases are found in the peroxisome matrix. Only one protease, DEG15/Tysnd1, has a well-defined role in peroxisome biology. The rat Tysnd1 protease removes the targeting signal after PTS2-containing proteins enter the peroxisome and also processes certain PTS1-containing β-oxidation enzymes (Kurochkin et al., 2007). Similarly, the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) Tysnd1 homolog DEG15 (At1g28320) is a peroxisomal Ser protease that removes PTS2 targeting signals (Helm et al., 2007; Schuhmann et al., 2008).In contrast with DEG15, little is known about the other eight Arabidopsis proteins that are annotated as proteases in the AraPerox database of putative peroxisomal proteins (Reumann et al., 2004; Carter et al., 2004; Shimaoka et al., 2004), which, in combination with the minor PTS found in both of these predicted proteases (Reumann, 2004), suggests that these enzymes may not be peroxisomal. Along with DEG15, only two of the predicted peroxisomal proteases, an M16 metalloprotease (At2g41790), which we have named PXM16 for peroxisomal M16 protease, and a Lon-related protease (At5g47040/LON2; Ostersetzer et al., 2007), are found in the proteome of peroxisomes purified from Arabidopsis suspension cells (Eubel et al., 2008). DEG15 and LON2 also have been validated as peroxisomally targeted using GFP fusions (Ostersetzer et al., 2007; Schuhmann et al., 2008).

Table I.

Putative Arabidopsis proteases predicted or demonstrated to be peroxisomal

A Targeted Multilocus Genotyping Assay for Lineage,Serogroup, and Epidemic Clone Typing of Listeria monocytogenes

A 30-probe assay was developed for simultaneous classification of Listeria monocytogenes isolates by lineage (I to IV), major serogroup (4b, 1/2b, 1/2a, and 1/2c), and epidemic clone (EC) type (ECI, ECIa, ECII, and ECIII). The assay was designed to facilitate rapid strain characterization and the integration of subtype data into risk-based inspection programs.Listeria monocytogenes is a facultative intracellular pathogen that can cause serious invasive illness (listeriosis) in humans and other animals. L. monocytogenes is responsible for over 25% of food-borne-disease-related deaths attributable to known pathogens and is a leading cause of food recalls due to microbial adulteration (12, 21). However, not all L. monocytogenes subtypes contribute equally to human illness, and substantial differences in the ecologies and virulence attributes of different L. monocytogenes subtypes have been identified (9, 13, 14, 23, 24, 33, 35, 36). Among the four major evolutionary lineages of L. monocytogenes, only lineages I and II are commonly isolated from contaminated food and human listeriosis patients (19, 27, 29, 33). Lineage I strains are overrepresented among human listeriosis isolates, particularly those associated with epidemic outbreaks, whereas lineage II strains are overrepresented in foods and the environment (13, 14, 24). Lineage III strains account for approximately 1% of human listeriosis cases but are common among animal listeriosis isolates and appear to be a host-adapted group that is poorly adapted to food-processing environments (6, 34-36). The ecological and virulence attributes of lineage IV are poorly understood, as this lineage is rare and was only recently described based on a small number of strains (19, 26, 29, 33).L. monocytogenes is differentiated into 13 serotypes; however, four major serogroups (4b, 1/2b, 1/2a, and 1/2c) from within lineages I and II account for more than 98% of human and food isolates (16, 31). Serogroups refer to evolutionary complexes typified by a predominant serotype but which include very rare serotypes that represent minor evolutionary variants (7, 9, 33). Phylogenetic analyses have indicated that rare serotypes may have evolved recently, or even multiple times, from one of the major serotypes (9), and numerous molecular methods fail to discriminate minor serotypes as independent groups (1, 4, 7, 9, 18, 22, 33, 38, 39). Serotyping is one of the most common methods for L. monocytogenes subtyping, and serogroup classifications are a useful component of strain characterization because ecotype divisions appear largely congruent with serogroup distinctions (16, 34). Serogroup 4b strains are of particular public health concern because contamination with these strains appears to increase the probability that a ready-to-eat (RTE) food will be implicated in listeriosis (16, 28). Serogroup 4b strains account for approximately 40% of sporadic listeriosis and also are responsible for the majority of listeriosis outbreaks despite being relatively rare contaminants of food products (9, 13, 17, 30, 34). In addition, serogroup 4b strains are associated with more severe clinical presentations and higher mortality rates than other serogroups (11, 16, 20, 31, 34). Serogroups 1/2a and 1/2b are overrepresented among food isolates but also contribute significantly to human listeriosis, whereas serogroup 1/2c rarely causes human illness and may pose a lower risk of listeriosis for humans (16). Serogroup-specific differences in association with human listeriosis are consistent with the prevalence of virulence-attenuating mutations in inlA within these serogroups (32, 34); however, a number of additional factors likely contribute to these differences.Four previously described epidemic clones (ECs; ECI, ECIa, ECII, and ECIII) of L. monocytogenes have been implicated in numerous listeriosis outbreaks and have contributed significantly to sporadic illness (15, 34). ECI, ECIa, and ECII are distinct groups within serogroup 4b that were each responsible for repeated outbreaks of listeriosis in the United States and Europe. ECIII is a lineage II clone of serotype 1/2a that persisted in the same processing facility for more than a decade prior to causing a multistate outbreak linked to contaminated turkey (15, 25). While there has been speculation that epidemic clones possess unique adaptations that explain their frequent involvement in listeriosis outbreaks (9, 34, 37), it is not clear that epidemic clones are more virulent than other strains with the same serotype. However, contamination of RTE food with EC strains would be cause for increased concern due to the previous involvement of these clones in major outbreaks of listeriosis (16).As a result of the L. monocytogenes subtype-specific differences in ecology, virulence, and association with human illness, molecular subtyping technologies have the potential to inform assessments of relative risk and to improve risk-based inspection programs. The objective of the present study was to develop a single assay for rapid and accurate classification of L. monocytogenes isolates by lineage, major serogroup, and epidemic clone in order to facilitate strain characterization and the integration of subtype data into inspection programs that are based on assessment of relative risk.A database of more than 5.3 Mb of comparative DNA sequences from 238 L. monocytogenes isolates (9, 33-35) was scanned for single nucleotide polymorphisms that could be used to differentiate lineages, major serogroups, and epidemic clones via a targeted multilocus genotyping (TMLGT) approach. The acronym TMLGT is used to distinguish this approach from previously published multilocus genotyping (MLGT) assays that were lineage specific and designed for haplotype discrimination (9, 33). To provide for simultaneous interrogation of the selected polymorphisms via TMLGT, six genomic regions (Table ​(Table1)1) were coamplified in a multiplex PCR. While the previous MLGT assays were based on three lineage-specific multiplexes and required prior identification of lineage identity, TMLGT was designed to target variation across all of the lineages simultaneously and is based on a unique set of amplicons. PCR was performed in 50-μl volumes with 1× High Fidelity PCR buffer (Invitrogen Life Technologies), 2 mM MgSO₄, 100 μM deoxynucleoside triphosphate (dNTP), 300 nM primer, 1.5 U Platinum Taq high-fidelity DNA polymerase (Invitrogen Life Technologies), and 100 ng of genomic DNA. PCR consisted of an initial denaturation of 90 s at 96°C, followed by 40 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 50°C, and 90 s at 68°C. Amplification products were purified using Montage PCR cleanup filter plates (Millipore) and served as a template for allele-specific primer extension (ASPE) reactions utilizing subtype-specific probes.

TABLE 1.

Primers used in multiplex amplification for the TMLGT assay

Retrograde Intraflagellar Transport Mutants Identify Complex A Proteins With Multiple Genetic Interactions in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii

The intraflagellar transport machinery is required for the assembly of cilia. It has been investigated by biochemical, genetic, and computational methods that have identified at least 21 proteins that assemble into two subcomplexes. It has been hypothesized that complex A is required for retrograde transport. Temperature-sensitive mutations in FLA15 and FLA17 show defects in retrograde intraflagellar transport (IFT) in Chlamydomonas. We show that IFT144 and IFT139, two complex A proteins, are encoded by FLA15 and FLA17, respectively. The fla15 allele is a missense mutation in a conserved cysteine and the fla17 allele is an in-frame deletion of three exons. The flagellar assembly defect of each mutant is rescued by the respective transgenes. In fla15 and fla17 mutants, bulges form in the distal one-third of the flagella at the permissive temperature and this phenotype is also rescued by the transgenes. These bulges contain the complex B component IFT74/72, but not α-tubulin or p28, a component of an inner dynein arm, which suggests specificity with respect to the proteins that accumulate in these bulges. IFT144 and IFT139 are likely to interact with each other and other proteins on the basis of three distinct genetic tests: (1) Double mutants display synthetic flagellar assembly defects at the permissive temperature, (2) heterozygous diploid strains exhibit second-site noncomplemention, and (3) transgenes confer two-copy suppression. Since these tests show different levels of phenotypic sensitivity, we propose they illustrate different gradations of gene interaction between complex A proteins themselves and with a complex B protein (IFT172).CILIA and flagella are microtubule-based organelles that are found on most mammalian cells. They provide motility to cells and participate in many sensory processes. Defects in or loss of cilia/flagella cause a variety of human diseases that include polycystic kidney disease, retinal degeneration, infertility, obesity, respiratory defects, left–right axis determination, and polydactyly (Fliegauf et al. 2007). Mouse mutants demonstrate that cilia are essential for viability, neural tube closure, and bone development (Eggenschwiler and Anderson 2007; Fliegauf et al. 2007). Cilia and flagella are also present in protists, algae, moss, and some fungi.The assembly and maintenance of cilia and flagella require intraflagellar transport (IFT) (Kozminski et al. 1995). IFT involves the movement of 100- to 200-nm-long protein particles from the basal body located in the cell body to the tip of the flagella using the heterotrimeric kinesin-2 (anterograde movement) (Kozminski et al. 1995) and movement back to the cell body (retrograde movement) using the cytoplasmic dynein complex (Pazour et al. 1999; Porter et al. 1999). IFT particles change their direction of movement as well as their size, speed, and frequency at the ends of the flagella as they switch from anterograde to retrograde movement (Iomini et al. 2001). Biochemical isolation of IFT particles reveals that they are composed of at least 16 proteins and that these particles can be dissociated into two complexes in vitro by changing the salt concentration (Cole et al. 1998; Piperno et al. 1998). Recent genetic and bioinformatics analysis adds at least 7 more proteins to the IFT particle (Follit et al. 2009) (Eggenschwiler and Anderson 2007).

TABLE 1

Proteins and gene names for the intraflagellar transport particles in Chlamydomonas, C. elegans, and mouse

Identification of the Site-Specific DNA Invertase Responsible for the Phase Variation of SusC/SusD Family Outer Membrane Proteins in Bacteroides fragilis

The human gut microbe Bacteroides fragilis can alter the expression of its surface molecules, such as capsular polysaccharides and SusC/SusD family outer membrane proteins, through reversible DNA inversions. We demonstrate here that DNA inversions at 12 invertible regions, including three gene clusters for SusC/SusD family proteins, were controlled by a single tyrosine site-specific recombinase (Tsr0667) encoded by BF0667 in B. fragilis strain YCH46. Genetic disruption of BF0667 diminished or attenuated shufflon-type DNA inversions at all three susC/susD genes clusters, as well as simple DNA inversions at nine other loci, most of which colocalized with susC/susD family genes. The inverted repeat sequences found within the Tsr0667-regulated invertible regions shared the consensus motif sequence AGTYYYN₄GDACT. Tsr0667 specifically mediated the DNA inversions of 10 of the 12 regions, even under an Escherichia coli background when the invertible regions were exposed to BF0667 in E. coli cells. Thus, Tsr0667 is an additional globally acting DNA invertase in B. fragilis, which probably involves the selective expression of SusC/SusD family outer membrane proteins.The human gut harbors an abundant and diverse microbiota. Bacteroides is one of the most abundant genera of human gut microflora (10, 17, 20), and the biological activities of Bacteroides species are deeply integrated into human physiology through nutrient degradation, the production of short-chain fatty acids, or immunomodulatory molecules (11-14, 24). Recent genomic analyses of Bacteroides have revealed that the bacteria possess redundant abilities not only to bind and degrade otherwise indigestible dietary polysaccharides but also to produce vast arrays of capsular polysaccharide (5, 19, 38, 39). These functional redundancies have been established by the extensive duplication of various genes that encode molecules such as glycosylhydrolases, glycosyltransferases, and outer membrane proteins of the SusC/SusD family (starch utilization system) known to be involved in polysaccharide recognition and transport (7, 27, 28, 30). It has been assumed that these functional redundancies of Bacteroides contribute to the stability of the gut ecosystem (3, 21, 23, 32, 39).Another characteristic feature common in Bacteroides species is that the expression of some of the genes is altered in an on-off manner by reversible DNA inversions at gene promoters or within the protein-coding regions (5, 9, 19, 38, 39). These phase-variable phenotypes are associated with surface architectures such as capsular polysaccharides and SusC/SusD family proteins (5, 6, 16, 19). Our previous genomic analyses of Bacteroides fragilis strain YCH46 revealed that it contained as many as 31 invertible regions in its chromosome (19). These invertible regions can be grouped into six classes according to the internal motif sequences within inverted repeat sequences (IRs) (Table ​(Table1).1). The DNA inversions within these regions are thought to be controlled by site-specific DNA invertases specific to each class. B. fragilis strain YCH46 contains 33 tyrosine site-specific recombinases (Tsr) genes and four serine site-specific recombinases (Ssr) genes. Generally, DNA invertases mediate DNA inversions at adjacent regions, such as FimB and FimE, that flip their immediate downstream promoters to generate a phase-variable phenotype of type I pili in Escherichia coli (15). B. fragilis is unique in that this anaerobe possesses not only locally acting DNA invertases but also globally acting DNA invertases that mediate DNA inversions at distant loci (8, 29). It has been reported that B. fragilis possesses at least two types of master DNA invertase that regulate DNA inversions at multiple loci simultaneously (8, 29). One is Mpi, an Ssr that mediates the on-off switching of 13 promoter regions (corresponding to class I regions in B. fragilis strain YCH46), including seven promoter regions for capsular polysaccharide biosynthesis in B. fragilis strain NCTC9343 (8). The other master DNA invertase is Tsr19, a Tsr that regulates DNA inversions at two distantly located promoter regions (corresponding to class IV regions in B. fragilis strain YCH46) associated with the large encapsulation phenotype (6, 26, 29). The invertible regions contain specific consensus motifs within the IRs corresponding to each DNA invertase and constitute a regulatory unit. We designated this type of regulatory unit as an “inverlon,” which consists of at least two invertible regions controlled by a single master DNA invertase.

TABLE 1.

Classification of the invertible regions in B. fragilis strain YCH46 based on internal motif sequences within IRs

Widespread Distribution of Cell Defense against d-Aminoacyl-tRNAs

Several l-aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases can transfer a d-amino acid onto their cognate tRNA(s). This harmful reaction is counteracted by the enzyme d-aminoacyl-tRNA deacylase. Two distinct deacylases were already identified in bacteria (DTD1) and in archaea (DTD2), respectively. Evidence was given that DTD1 homologs also exist in nearly all eukaryotes, whereas DTD2 homologs occur in plants. On the other hand, several bacteria, including most cyanobacteria, lack genes encoding a DTD1 homolog. Here we show that Synechocystis sp. PCC6803 produces a third type of deacylase (DTD3). Inactivation of the corresponding gene (dtd3) renders the growth of Synechocystis sp. hypersensitive to the presence of d-tyrosine. Based on the available genomes, DTD3-like proteins are predicted to occur in all cyanobacteria. Moreover, one or several dtd3-like genes can be recognized in all cellular types, arguing in favor of the nearubiquity of an enzymatic function involved in the defense of translational systems against invasion by d-amino acids.Although they are detected in various living organisms (reviewed in Ref. 1), d-amino acids are thought not to be incorporated into proteins, because of the stereospecificity of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases and of the translational machinery, including EF-Tu and the ribosome (2). However, the discrimination between l- and d-amino acids by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases is not equal to 100%. Significant d-aminoacylation of their cognate tRNAs by Escherichia coli tyrosyl-, tryptophanyl-, aspartyl-, lysyl-, and histidyl-tRNA synthetases has been characterized in vitro (3–9). Recently, using a bacterium, transfer of d-tyrosine onto tRNA^Tyr was shown to occur in vivo (10).With such misacylation reactions, the resulting d-aminoacyl-tRNAs form a pool of metabolically inactive molecules, at best. At worst, d-aminoacylated tRNAs infiltrate the protein synthesis machinery. Although the latter harmful possibility has not yet been firmly established, several cells were shown to possess a d-tyrosyl-tRNA deacylase, or DTD, that should help them counteract the accumulation of d-aminoacyl-tRNAs. This enzyme shows a broad specificity, being able to remove various d-aminoacyl moieties from the 3′-end of a tRNA (4–6, 11). Such a function makes the deacylase a member of the family of enzymes capable of editing in trans mis-aminoacylated tRNAs. This family includes several homologs of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase editing domains (12), as well as peptidyl-tRNA hydrolase (13, 14).Two distinct deacylases have already been discovered. The first one, called DTD1, is predicted to occur in most bacteria and eukaryotes (see d-amino acids, including d-tyrosine (6). In fact, in an E. coli Δdtd strain grown in the presence of 2.4 mm d-tyrosine, as much as 40% of the cellular tRNA^Tyr pool becomes esterified with d-tyrosine (10).

TABLE 1

Distribution of DTD1 and DTD2 homologs in various phylogenetic groupsHomologs of DTD1 and DTD2 were searched for using a genomic Blast analysis against complete genomes in the NCBI Database (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). Values in the table are number of species. For instance, E. coli is counted only once in γ-proteobacteria despite the fact that several E. coli strains have been sequenced.

Structural Characterization of the Dual Glycan Binding Adeno-Associated Virus Serotype 6

The three-dimensional structure of adeno-associated virus (AAV) serotype 6 (AAV6) was determined using cryo-electron microscopy and image reconstruction and using X-ray crystallography to 9.7- and 3.0-Å resolution, respectively. The AAV6 capsid contains a highly conserved, eight-stranded (βB to βI) β-barrel core and large loop regions between the strands which form the capsid surface, as observed in other AAV structures. The loops show conformational variation compared to other AAVs, consistent with previous reports that amino acids in these loop regions are involved in differentiating AAV receptor binding, transduction efficiency, and antigenicity properties. Toward structure-function annotation of AAV6 with respect to its unique dual glycan receptor (heparan sulfate and sialic acid) utilization for cellular recognition, and its enhanced lung epithelial transduction compared to other AAVs, the capsid structure was compared to that of AAV1, which binds sialic acid and differs from AAV6 in only 6 out of 736 amino acids. Five of these residues are located at or close to the icosahedral 3-fold axis of the capsid, thereby identifying this region as imparting important functions, such as receptor attachment and transduction phenotype. Two of the five observed amino acids are located in the capsid interior, suggesting that differential AAV infection properties are also controlled by postentry intracellular events. Density ordered inside the capsid, under the 3-fold axis in a previously reported, conserved AAV DNA binding pocket, was modeled as a nucleotide and a base, further implicating this capsid region in AAV genome recognition and/or stabilization.Adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) are nonpathogenic single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) parvoviruses that belong to the Dependovirus genus and require helper viruses, such as Adenovirus or Herpesvirus, for lytic infection (4, 8, 22, 67). These viruses package a genome of ∼4.7 kb inside an icosahedral capsid (∼260 Å in diameter) with a triangulation number equal to 1 assembled from a total of 60 copies of their overlapping capsid viral protein (VP) 1 (VP1), VP2, and VP3 in a predicted ratio of 1:1:8/10 (10). The VPs are encoded from a cap open reading frame (ORF). VP3 is 61 kDa and constitutes 90% of the capsid''s protein composition. The less abundant VPs, VP1 (87 kDa) and VP2 (73 kDa), share the same C-terminal amino acid sequence with VP3 but have additional N-terminal sequences. A rep ORF codes for four overlapping proteins required for replication and DNA packaging.To date, more than 100 AAV isolates have been identified (21). Among the human and nonhuman primate AAVs isolated, 12 serotypes (AAV serotype 1 [AAV1] to AAV12) have been described and are classified into six phylogenetic clades on the basis of their VP sequences and antigenic reactivities, with AAV4 and AAV5 considered to be clonal isolates (21). AAV1 and AAV6, which represent clade A, differ by only 6 out of 736 VP1 amino acids (5 amino acids within VP3) and are antigenically cross-reactive. Other clade representatives include AAV2 (clade B), AAV2-AAV3 hybrid (clade C), AAV7 (clade D), AAV8 (clade E), and AAV9 (clade F) (21).The AAVs are under development as clinical gene delivery vectors (e.g., see references 5, 9, 12, 13, 24, 25, 53, and 61), with AAV2, the prototype member of the genus, being the most extensively studied serotype for this application. AAV2 has been successfully used to treat several disorders, but its broad tissue tropism makes it less effective for tissue-specific applications and the prevalence of preexisting neutralizing antibodies in the human population (11, 43) limits its utilization, especially when readministration is required to achieve a therapeutic outcome. Efforts have thus focused on characterizing the capsid-associated tissue tropism and transduction properties conferred by the capsid of representative serotypes of other clades (21). Outcomes of these studies include the observation that AAV1 and AAV6, for example, transduce liver, muscle, and airway epithelial cells more efficiently (e.g., up to 200-fold) than AAV2 (27, 28, 30). In addition, the six residues (Table ​(Table1)1) that differ between the VPs of AAV1 and AAV6 (a natural recombinant of AAV1 and AAV2 [56]) confer functional disparity between these two viruses. For example, AAV6 shows ∼3-fold higher lung cell epithelium transduction than AAV1 (27), and AAV1 and AAV6 bind terminally sialylated proteoglycans as their primary receptor, whereas AAV6 additionally binds to heparan sulfate (HS) proteoglycans with moderate affinity (70, 71). Therefore, a comparison of the AAV1 and AAV6 serotypes and, in particular, their capsid structures can help pinpoint the capsid regions that confer differences in cellular recognition and tissue transduction.

TABLE 1.

Amino acid differences between AAV1 and AAV6 and their reported mutants