共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
Tatsuhiro Sato Akio Nakashima Lea Guo Fuyuhiko Tamanoi 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(19):12783-12791
Rheb G-protein plays critical roles in the TSC/Rheb/mTOR signaling pathway
by activating mTORC1. The activation of mTORC1 by Rheb can be faithfully
reproduced in vitro by using mTORC1 immunoprecipitated by the use of
anti-raptor antibody from mammalian cells starved for nutrients. The low
in vitro kinase activity against 4E-BP1 of this mTORC1 preparation is
dramatically increased by the addition of recombinant Rheb. On the other hand,
the addition of Rheb does not activate mTORC2 immunoprecipitated from
mammalian cells by the use of anti-rictor antibody. The activation of mTORC1
is specific to Rheb, because other G-proteins such as KRas, RalA/B, and Cdc42
did not activate mTORC1. Both Rheb1 and Rheb2 activate mTORC1. In addition,
the activation is dependent on the presence of bound GTP. We also find that
the effector domain of Rheb is required for the mTORC1 activation. FKBP38, a
recently proposed mediator of Rheb action, appears not to be involved in the
Rheb-dependent activation of mTORC1 in vitro, because the preparation
of mTORC1 that is devoid of FKBP38 is still activated by Rheb. The addition of
Rheb results in a significant increase of binding of the substrate protein
4E-BP1 to mTORC1. PRAS40, a TOR signaling (TOS) motif-containing protein that
competes with the binding of 4EBP1 to mTORC1, inhibits Rheb-induced activation
of mTORC1. A preparation of mTORC1 that is devoid of raptor is not activated
by Rheb. Rheb does not induce autophosphorylation of mTOR. These results
suggest that Rheb induces alteration in the binding of 4E-BP1 with mTORC1 to
regulate mTORC1 activation.Rheb defines a unique member of the Ras superfamily G-proteins
(1). We have shown that Rheb
proteins are conserved and are found from yeast to human
(2). Although yeast and fruit
fly have one Rheb, mouse and human have two Rheb proteins termed Rheb1 (or
simply Rheb) and Rheb2 (RhebL1)
(2). Structurally, these
proteins contain G1-G5 boxes, short stretches of amino acids that define the
function of the Ras superfamily G-proteins including guanine nucleotide
binding (1,
3,
4). Rheb proteins have a
conserved arginine at residue 15 that corresponds to residue 12 of Ras
(1). The effector domain
required for the binding with downstream effectors encompasses the G2 box and
its adjacent sequences (1,
5). Structural analysis by
x-ray crystallography further shows that the effector domain is exposed to
solvent, is located close to the phosphates of GTP especially at residues
35–38, and undergoes conformational change during GTP/GDP exchange
(6). In addition, all Rheb
proteins end with the CAAX (C is cysteine, A is an aliphatic amino
acid, and X is the C-terminal amino acid) motif that signals
farnesylation. In fact, we as well as others have shown that these proteins
are farnesylated
(7–9).Rheb plays critical roles in the TSC/Rheb/mTOR signaling, a signaling
pathway that plays central roles in regulating protein synthesis and growth in
response to nutrient, energy, and growth conditions
(10–14).
Rheb is down-regulated by a TSC1·TSC2 complex that acts as a
GTPase-activating protein for Rheb
(15–19).
Recent studies established that the GAP domain of TSC2 defines the functional
domain for the down-regulation of Rheb
(20). Mutations in the
Tsc1 or Tsc2 gene lead to tuberous sclerosis whose symptoms
include the appearance of benign tumors called hamartomas at different parts
of the body as well as neurological symptoms
(21,
22). Overexpression of Rheb
results in constitutive activation of mTOR even in the absence of nutrients
(15,
16). Two mTOR complexes,
mTORC1 and mTORC2, have been identified
(23,
24). Whereas mTORC1 is
involved in protein synthesis activation mediated by S6K and 4EBP1, mTORC2 is
involved in the phosphorylation of Akt in response to insulin. It has been
suggested that Rheb is involved in the activation of mTORC1 but not mTORC2
(25).Although Rheb is clearly involved in the activation of mTOR, the mechanism
of activation has not been established. We as well as others have suggested a
model that involves the interaction of Rheb with the TOR complex
(26–28).
Rheb activation of mTOR kinase activity using immunoprecipitated mTORC1 was
reported (29). Rheb has been
shown to interact with mTOR
(27,
30), and this may involve
direct interaction of Rheb with the kinase domain of mTOR
(27). However, this Rheb/mTOR
interaction is a weak interaction and is not dependent on the presence of GTP
bound to Rheb (27,
28). Recently, a different
model proposing that FKBP38 (FK506-binding protein
38) mediates the activation of
mTORC1 by Rheb was proposed
(31,
32). In this model, FKBP38
binds mTOR and negatively regulates mTOR activity, and this negative
regulation is blocked by the binding of Rheb to FKBP38. However, recent
reports dispute this idea
(33).To further characterize Rheb activation of mTOR, we have utilized an in
vitro system that reproduces activation of mTORC1 by the addition of
recombinant Rheb. We used mTORC1 immunoprecipitated from nutrient-starved
cells using anti-raptor antibody and have shown that its kinase activity
against 4E-BP1 is dramatically increased by the addition of recombinant Rheb.
Importantly, the activation of mTORC1 is specific to Rheb and is dependent on
the presence of bound GTP as well as an intact effector domain. FKBP38 is not
detected in our preparation and further investigation suggests that FKBP38 is
not an essential component for the activation of mTORC1 by Rheb. Our study
revealed that Rheb enhances the binding of a substrate 4E-BP1 with mTORC1
rather than increasing the kinase activity of mTOR. 相似文献
2.
3.
4.
James Sinnett-Smith Rodrigo Jacamo Robert Kui YunZu M. Wang Steven H. Young Osvaldo Rey Richard T. Waldron Enrique Rozengurt 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(20):13434-13445
Rapid protein kinase D (PKD) activation and phosphorylation via protein
kinase C (PKC) have been extensively documented in many cell types cells
stimulated by multiple stimuli. In contrast, little is known about the role
and mechanism(s) of a recently identified sustained phase of PKD activation in
response to G protein-coupled receptor agonists. To elucidate the role of
biphasic PKD activation, we used Swiss 3T3 cells because PKD expression in
these cells potently enhanced duration of ERK activation and DNA synthesis in
response to Gq-coupled receptor agonists. Cell treatment with the
preferential PKC inhibitors GF109203X or Gö6983 profoundly inhibited PKD
activation induced by bombesin stimulation for <15 min but did not prevent
PKD catalytic activation induced by bombesin stimulation for longer times
(>60 min). The existence of sequential PKC-dependent and PKC-independent
PKD activation was demonstrated in 3T3 cells stimulated with various
concentrations of bombesin (0.3–10 nm) or with vasopressin, a
different Gq-coupled receptor agonist. To gain insight into the
mechanisms involved, we determined the phosphorylation state of the activation
loop residues Ser744 and Ser748. Transphosphorylation
targeted Ser744, whereas autophosphorylation was the predominant
mechanism for Ser748 in cells stimulated with Gq-coupled
receptor agonists. We next determined which phase of PKD activation is
responsible for promoting enhanced ERK activation and DNA synthesis in
response to Gq-coupled receptor agonists. We show, for the first
time, that the PKC-independent phase of PKD activation mediates prolonged ERK
signaling and progression to DNA synthesis in response to bombesin or
vasopressin through a pathway that requires epidermal growth factor
receptor-tyrosine kinase activity. Thus, our results identify a novel
mechanism of Gq-coupled receptor-induced mitogenesis mediated by
sustained PKD activation through a PKC-independent pathway.The understanding of the mechanisms that control cell proliferation
requires the identification of the molecular pathways that govern the
transition of quiescent cells into the S phase of the cell cycle. In this
context the activation and phosphorylation of protein kinase D
(PKD),4 the founding
member of a new protein kinase family within the
Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase (CAMK) group and separate
from the previously identified PKCs (for review, see Ref.
1), are attracting intense
attention. In unstimulated cells, PKD is in a state of low catalytic (kinase)
activity maintained by autoinhibition mediated by the N-terminal domain, a
region containing a repeat of cysteinerich zinc finger-like motifs and a
pleckstrin homology (PH) domain
(1–4).
Physiological activation of PKD within cells occurs via a
phosphorylation-dependent mechanism first identified in our laboratory
(5–7).
In response to cellular stimuli
(1), including phorbol esters,
growth factors (e.g. PDGF), and G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)
agonists (6,
8–16)
that signal through Gq, G12, Gi, and Rho
(11,
15–19),
PKD is converted into a form with high catalytic activity, as shown by in
vitro kinase assays performed in the absence of lipid co-activators
(5,
20).During these studies multiple lines of evidence indicated that PKC activity
is necessary for rapid PKD activation within intact cells. For example, rapid
PKD activation was selectively and potently blocked by cell treatment with
preferential PKC inhibitors (e.g. GF109203X or Gö6983) that do
not directly inhibit PKD catalytic activity
(5,
20), implying that PKD
activation in intact cells is mediated directly or indirectly through PKCs.
Many reports demonstrated the operation of a rapid PKC/PKD signaling cascade
induced by multiple GPCR agonists and other receptor ligands in a range of
cell types (for review, see Ref.
1). Our previous studies
identified Ser744 and Ser748 in the PKD activation loop
(also referred as activation segment or T-loop) as phosphorylation sites
critical for PKC-mediated PKD activation
(1,
4,
7,
17,
21). Collectively, these
findings demonstrated the existence of a rapidly activated PKC-PKD protein
kinase cascade(s). In a recent study we found that the rapid PKC-dependent PKD
activation was followed by a late, PKC-independent phase of catalytic
activation and phosphorylation induced by stimulation of the bombesin
Gq-coupled receptor ectopically expressed in COS-7 cells
(22). This study raised the
possibility that PKD mediates rapid biological responses downstream of PKCs,
whereas, in striking contrast, PKD could mediate long term responses through
PKC-independent pathways. Despite its potential importance for defining the
role of PKC and PKD in signal transduction, this hypothesis has not been
tested in any cell type.Accumulating evidence demonstrates that PKD plays an important role in
several cellular processes and activities, including signal transduction
(14,
23–25),
chromatin organization (26),
Golgi function (27,
28), gene expression
(29–31),
immune regulation (26), and
cell survival, adhesion, motility, differentiation, DNA synthesis, and
proliferation (for review, see Ref.
1). In Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts, a
cell line used extensively as a model system to elucidate mechanisms of
mitogenic signaling
(32–34),
PKD expression potently enhances ERK activation, DNA synthesis, and cell
proliferation induced by Gq-coupled receptor agonists
(8,
14). Here, we used this model
system to elucidate the role and mechanism(s) of biphasic PKD activation.
First, we show that the Gq-coupled receptor agonists bombesin and
vasopressin, in contrast to phorbol esters, specifically induce PKD activation
through early PKC-dependent and late PKC-independent mechanisms in Swiss 3T3
cells. Subsequently, we demonstrate for the first time that the
PKC-independent phase of PKD activation is responsible for promoting ERK
signaling and progression to DNA synthesis through an epidermal growth factor
receptor (EGFR)-dependent pathway. Thus, our results identify a novel
mechanism of Gq-coupled receptor-induced mitogenesis mediated by
sustained PKD activation through a PKC-independent pathway. 相似文献
5.
As obligate intracellular parasites, viruses exploit diverse cellular
signaling machineries, including the mitogen-activated protein-kinase pathway,
during their infections. We have demonstrated previously that the open reading
frame 45 (ORF45) of Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus interacts with p90
ribosomal S6 kinases (RSKs) and strongly stimulates their kinase activities
(Kuang, E., Tang, Q., Maul, G. G., and Zhu, F.
(2008) J. Virol. 82
,1838
-1850). Here, we define the
mechanism by which ORF45 activates RSKs. We demonstrated that binding of ORF45
to RSK increases the association of extracellular signal-regulated kinase
(ERK) with RSK, such that ORF45, RSK, and ERK formed high molecular mass
protein complexes. We further demonstrated that the complexes shielded active
pERK and pRSK from dephosphorylation. As a result, the complex-associated RSK
and ERK were activated and sustained at high levels. Finally, we provide
evidence that this mechanism contributes to the sustained activation of ERK
and RSK in Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus lytic replication.The extracellular signal-regulated kinase
(ERK)2
mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway has been implicated
in diverse cellular physiological processes including proliferation, survival,
growth, differentiation, and motility
(1-4)
and is also exploited by a variety of viruses such as Kaposi
sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV), human cytomegalovirus, human
immunodeficiency virus, respiratory syncytial virus, hepatitis B virus,
coxsackie, vaccinia, coronavirus, and influenza virus
(5-17).
The MAPK kinases relay the extracellular signaling through sequential
phosphorylation to an array of cytoplasmic and nuclear substrates to elicit
specific responses (1,
2,
18). Phosphorylation of MAPK
is reversible. The kinetics of deactivation or duration of signaling dictates
diverse biological outcomes
(19,
20). For example, sustained
but not transient activation of ERK signaling induces the differentiation of
PC12 cells into sympathetic-like neurons and transformation of NIH3T3 cells
(20-22).
During viral infection, a unique biphasic ERK activation has been observed for
some viruses (an early transient activation triggered by viral binding or
entry and a late sustained activation correlated with viral gene expression),
but the responsible viral factors and underlying mechanism for the sustained
ERK activation remain largely unknown
(5,
8,
13,
23).The p90 ribosomal S6 kinases (RSKs) are a family of serine/threonine
kinases that lie at the terminus of the ERK pathway
(1,
24-26).
In mammals, four isoforms are known, RSK1 to RSK4. Each one has two
catalytically functional kinase domains, the N-terminal kinase domain (NTKD)
and C-terminal kinase domain (CTKD) as well as a linker region between the
two. The NTKD is responsible for phosphorylation of exogenous substrates, and
the CTKD and linker region regulate RSK activation
(1,
24,
25). In quiescent cells ERK
binds to the docking site in the C terminus of RSK
(27-29).
Upon mitogen stimulation, ERK is activated by its upstream MAPK/ERK kinase
(MEK). The active ERK phosphorylates Thr-359/Ser-363 of RSK in the linker
region (amino acid numbers refer to human RSK1) and Thr-573 in the CTKD
activation loop. The activated CTKD then phosphorylates Ser-380 in the linker
region, creating a docking site for 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein
kinase-1. The 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1 phosphorylates
Ser-221 of RSK in the activation loop and activates the NTKD. The activated
NTKD autophosphorylates the serine residue near the ERK docking site, causing
a transient dissociation of active ERK from RSK
(25,
26,
28). The stimulation of
quiescent cells by a mitogen such as epidermal growth factor or a phorbol
ester such as 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) usually
results in a transient RSK activation that lasts less than 30 min. RSKs have
been implicated in regulating cell survival, growth, and proliferation.
Mutation or aberrant expression of RSK has been implicated in several human
diseases including Coffin-Lowry syndrome and prostate and breast cancers
(1,
24,
25,
30-32).KSHV is a human DNA tumor virus etiologically linked to Kaposi sarcoma,
primary effusion lymphoma, and a subset of multicentric Castleman disease
(33,
34). Infection and
reactivation of KSHV activate multiple MAPK pathways
(6,
12,
35). Noticeably, the ERK/RSK
activation is sustained late during KSHV primary infection and reactivation
from latency (5,
6,
12,
23), but the mechanism of the
sustained ERK/RSK activation is unclear. Recently, we demonstrated that ORF45,
an immediate early and also virion tegument protein of KSHV, interacts with
RSK1 and RSK2 and strongly stimulates their kinase activities
(23). We also demonstrated
that the activation of RSK plays an essential role in KSHV lytic replication
(23). In the present study we
determined the mechanism of ORF45-induced sustained ERK/RSK activation. We
found that ORF45 increases the association of RSK with ERK and protects them
from dephosphorylation, causing sustained activation of both ERK and RSK. 相似文献
6.
7.
Nodar Makharashvili Tian Mi Olga Koroleva Sergey Korolev 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(3):1425-1434
RecF pathway proteins play an important role in the restart of stalled
replication and DNA repair in prokaryotes. Following DNA damage, RecF, RecR,
and RecO initiate homologous recombination (HR) by loading of the RecA
recombinase on single-stranded (ss) DNA, protected by ssDNA-binding protein.
The specific role of RecF in this process is not well understood. Previous
studies have proposed that RecF directs the RecOR complex to boundaries of
damaged DNA regions by recognizing single-stranded/double-stranded (ss/ds) DNA
junctions. RecF belongs to ABC-type ATPases, which function through an
ATP-dependent dimerization. Here, we demonstrate that the RecF of
Deinococcus radiodurans interacts with DNA as an ATP-dependent dimer,
and that the DNA binding and ATPase activity of RecF depend on both the
structure of DNA substrate, and the presence of RecR. We found that RecR
interacts as a tetramer with the RecF dimer. RecR increases the RecF affinity
to dsDNA without stimulating ATP hydrolysis but destabilizes RecF binding to
ssDNA and dimerization, likely due to increasing the ATPase rate. The
DNA-dependent binding of RecR to the RecF-DNA complex occurs through specific
protein-protein interactions without significant contributions from RecR-DNA
interactions. Finally, RecF neither alone nor in complex with RecR
preferentially binds to the ss/dsDNA junction. Our data suggest that the
specificity of the RecFOR complex toward the boundaries of DNA damaged regions
may result from a network of protein-protein and DNA-protein interactions,
rather than a simple recognition of the ss/dsDNA junction by RecF.Homologous recombination
(HR)2 is one of the
primary mechanisms by which cells repair dsDNA breaks (DSBs) and ssDNA gaps
(SSGs), and is important for restart of stalled DNA replication
(1). HR is initiated when
RecA-like recombinases bind to ssDNA forming an extended nucleoprotein
filament, referred to as a presynaptic complex
(2). The potential for genetic
rearrangements dictates that HR initiation is tightly regulated at multiple
levels (1). During replication,
the ssDNA-binding protein (SSB) protects transiently unwound DNA chains,
preventing interactions with recombinases. Following DNA damage, recombination
mediator proteins (RMPs) initiate HR by facilitating the formation of the
recombinase filaments with ssDNA, while removing SSB
(3,
4). Mutations in human proteins
involved in HR initiation are linked to cancer predisposition, chromosome
instability, UV sensitivity, and premature aging diseases
(4–8).
To date, little is known about the mechanism by which RMPs regulate the
formation of the recombinase filaments on the SSB-protected ssDNA.In Escherichia coli, there are two major recombination pathways,
RecBCD and RecF (9,
10). A helicase/nuclease
RecBCD complex processes DSBs and recruits RecA on ssDNA in a
sequence-specific manner
(11–13).
The principle players in the RecF pathway are the RecF, RecO, and RecR
proteins, which form an epistatic group that is important for SSG repair, for
restart of stalled DNA replication, and under specific conditions, can also
process DSBs
(14–20).
Homologs of RecF, -O, and -R are present in the majority of known bacteria
(21), including
Deinococcus radiodurans, extremely radiation-resistant bacteria that
lacks the RecBCD pathway, yet is capable of repairing thousands of DSBs
(22,
23). In addition, the sequence
or functional homologs of RecF pathway proteins are involved in similar
pathways in eukaryotes that include among others WRN, BLM, RAD52, and BRCA2
proteins
(4–8).The involvement of all three RecF, -O, and -R proteins in HR initiation is
well documented by genetic and cellular approaches
(18,
24–30),
yet their biochemical functions in the initiation process remain unclear,
particularly with respect to RecF. RecO and RecR proteins are sufficient to
promote formation of the RecA filament on SSB-bound ssDNA in vitro
(27). The UV-sensitive
phenotype of recF mutants can be suppressed by RecOR overexpression,
suggesting that RecF may direct the RMP complex to DNA-damaged regions where
HR initiation is required
(31). In agreement with this
hypothesis, RecF dramatically increases the efficiency of the RecA loading at
ds/ssDNA junctions with a 3′ ssDNA extension under specific conditions
(32). RecF and RecR proteins
also prevent the RecA filaments from extending into dsDNA regions adjacent to
SSGs (33). These data suggest
that RecF may directly recognize an ss/dsDNA junction structure
(34). However, DNA binding
experiments have not provided clear evidence to support such a hypothesis
(11).The targeting promoted by RecF may also occur through more complex
processes. RecF shares a high structural similarity with the head domain of
Rad50, an ABC-type ATPase that recognizes DSBs and initiates repair in archaea
and eukaryotes (35). All known
ABC-type ATPases function as oligomeric complexes in which a sequence of
inter- and intra-molecular interactions is triggered by the ATP-dependent
dimerization and the dimer-dependent ATP hydrolysis
(36–39).
RecF is also an ATP-dependent DNA-binding protein and a weak DNA-dependent
ATPase (11,
40). RecF forms an
ATP-dependent dimer and all three conserved motifs (Walker A, Walker B, and
“signature”) of RecF are important for ATP-dependent dimerization,
ATP hydrolysis, and functional resistance to DNA damage
(35). Thus, RecF may function
in recombination initiation through a complex pathway of protein-protein and
DNA-protein interactions regulated by ATP-dependent RecF dimerization.In this report, we present a detailed characterization of the RecF
dimerization, and its role in the RecF interaction with various DNA
substrates, with RecR, and in ATP hydrolysis. Our data outline the following
key findings. First, RecF interacts with DNA as a dimer. Second, neither RecF
alone nor the RecFR complex preferentially binds the ss/dsDNA junction.
Finally, RecR changes the ATPase activity and the DNA binding of RecF by
destabilizing the interaction with ssDNA, and greatly enhancing the
interaction with dsDNA. Our results suggest that the specificity of RecF for
the boundaries of SSGs is likely to result from a sequence of protein-protein
interaction events rather than a simple RecF ss/dsDNA binding, underlining a
highly regulated mechanism of the HR initiation by the RecFOR proteins. 相似文献
8.
Ruben K. Dagda Salvatore J. Cherra III Scott M. Kulich Anurag Tandon David Park Charleen T. Chu 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(20):13843-13855
Mitochondrial dysregulation is strongly implicated in Parkinson disease.
Mutations in PTEN-induced kinase 1 (PINK1) are associated with familial
parkinsonism and neuropsychiatric disorders. Although overexpressed PINK1 is
neuroprotective, less is known about neuronal responses to loss of PINK1
function. We found that stable knockdown of PINK1 induced mitochondrial
fragmentation and autophagy in SH-SY5Y cells, which was reversed by the
reintroduction of an RNA interference (RNAi)-resistant plasmid for PINK1.
Moreover, stable or transient overexpression of wild-type PINK1 increased
mitochondrial interconnectivity and suppressed toxin-induced
autophagy/mitophagy. Mitochondrial oxidant production played an essential role
in triggering mitochondrial fragmentation and autophagy in PINK1 shRNA lines.
Autophagy/mitophagy served a protective role in limiting cell death, and
overexpressing Parkin further enhanced this protective mitophagic response.
The dominant negative Drp1 mutant inhibited both fission and mitophagy in
PINK1-deficient cells. Interestingly, RNAi knockdown of autophagy proteins
Atg7 and LC3/Atg8 also decreased mitochondrial fragmentation without affecting
oxidative stress, suggesting active involvement of autophagy in morphologic
remodeling of mitochondria for clearance. To summarize, loss of PINK1 function
elicits oxidative stress and mitochondrial turnover coordinated by the
autophagic and fission/fusion machineries. Furthermore, PINK1 and Parkin may
cooperate through different mechanisms to maintain mitochondrial
homeostasis.Parkinson disease is an age-related neurodegenerative disease that affects
∼1% of the population worldwide. The causes of sporadic cases are unknown,
although mitochondrial or oxidative toxins such as
1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium, 6-hydroxydopamine
(6-OHDA),3 and
rotenone reproduce features of the disease in animal and cell culture models
(1). Abnormalities in
mitochondrial respiration and increased oxidative stress are observed in cells
and tissues from parkinsonian patients
(2,
3), which also exhibit
increased mitochondrial autophagy
(4). Furthermore, mutations in
parkinsonian genes affect oxidative stress response pathways and mitochondrial
homeostasis (5). Thus,
disruption of mitochondrial homeostasis represents a major factor implicated
in the pathogenesis of sporadic and inherited parkinsonian disorders (PD).The PARK6 locus involved in autosomal recessive and early-onset PD
encodes for PTEN-induced kinase 1 (PINK1)
(6,
7). PINK1 is a cytosolic and
mitochondrially localized 581-amino acid serine/threonine kinase that
possesses an N-terminal mitochondrial targeting sequence
(6,
8). The primary sequence also
includes a putative transmembrane domain important for orientation of the
PINK1 domain (8), a conserved
kinase domain homologous to calcium calmodulin kinases, and a C-terminal
domain that regulates autophosphorylation activity
(9,
10). Overexpression of
wild-type PINK1, but not its PD-associated mutants, protects against several
toxic insults in neuronal cells
(6,
11,
12). Mitochondrial targeting
is necessary for some (13) but
not all of the neuroprotective effects of PINK1
(14), implicating involvement
of cytoplasmic targets that modulate mitochondrial pathobiology
(8). PINK1 catalytic activity
is necessary for its neuroprotective role, because a kinase-deficient K219M
substitution in the ATP binding pocket of PINK1 abrogates its ability to
protect neurons (14). Although
PINK1 mutations do not seem to impair mitochondrial targeting, PD-associated
mutations differentially destabilize the protein, resulting in loss of
neuroprotective activities
(13,
15).Recent studies indicate that PINK1 and Parkin interact genetically
(3,
16-18)
to prevent oxidative stress
(19,
20) and regulate mitochondrial
morphology (21). Primary cells
derived from PINK1 mutant patients exhibit mitochondrial fragmentation with
disorganized cristae, recapitulated by RNA interference studies in HeLa cells
(3).Mitochondria are degraded by macroautophagy, a process involving
sequestration of cytoplasmic cargo into membranous autophagic vacuoles (AVs)
for delivery to lysosomes (22,
23). Interestingly,
mitochondrial fission accompanies autophagic neurodegeneration elicited by the
PD neurotoxin 6-OHDA (24,
25). Moreover, mitochondrial
fragmentation and increased autophagy are observed in neurodegenerative
diseases including Alzheimer and Parkinson diseases
(4,
26-28).
Although inclusion of mitochondria in autophagosomes was once believed to be a
random process, as observed during starvation, studies involving hypoxia,
mitochondrial damage, apoptotic stimuli, or limiting amounts of aerobic
substrates in facultative anaerobes support the concept of selective
mitochondrial autophagy (mitophagy)
(29,
30). In particular,
mitochondrially localized kinases may play an important role in models
involving oxidative mitochondrial injury
(25,
31,
32).Autophagy is involved in the clearance of protein aggregates
(33-35)
and normal regulation of axonal-synaptic morphology
(36). Chronic disruption of
lysosomal function results in accumulation of subtly impaired mitochondria
with decreased calcium buffering capacity
(37), implicating an important
role for autophagy in mitochondrial homeostasis
(37,
38). Recently, Parkin, which
complements the effects of PINK1 deficiency on mitochondrial morphology
(3), was found to promote
autophagy of depolarized mitochondria
(39). Conversely, Beclin
1-independent autophagy/mitophagy contributes to cell death elicited by the PD
toxins 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium and 6-OHDA
(25,
28,
31,
32), causing neurite
retraction in cells expressing a PD-linked mutation in leucine-rich repeat
kinase 2 (40). Whereas
properly regulated autophagy plays a homeostatic and neuroprotective role,
excessive or incomplete autophagy creates a condition of “autophagic
stress” that can contribute to neurodegeneration
(28).As mitochondrial fragmentation
(3) and increased mitochondrial
autophagy (4) have been
described in human cells or tissues of PD patients, we investigated whether or
not the engineered loss of PINK1 function could recapitulate these
observations in human neuronal cells (SH-SY5Y). Stable knockdown of endogenous
PINK1 gave rise to mitochondrial fragmentation and increased autophagy and
mitophagy, whereas stable or transient overexpression of PINK1 had the
opposite effect. Autophagy/mitophagy was dependent upon increased
mitochondrial oxidant production and activation of fission. The data indicate
that PINK1 is important for the maintenance of mitochondrial networks,
suggesting that coordinated regulation of mitochondrial dynamics and autophagy
limits cell death associated with loss of PINK1 function. 相似文献
9.
Kuen-Feng Chen Pei-Yen Yeh Chiun Hsu Chih-Hung Hsu Yen-Shen Lu Hsing-Pang Hsieh Pei-Jer Chen Ann-Lii Cheng 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(17):11121-11133
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common and aggressive
human malignancies. Recombinant tumor necrosis factor-related
apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) is a promising anti-tumor agent. However,
many HCC cells show resistance to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. In this study, we
showed that bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, overcame TRAIL resistance in
HCC cells, including Huh-7, Hep3B, and Sk-Hep1. The combination of bortezomib
and TRAIL restored the sensitivity of HCC cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis.
Comparing the molecular change in HCC cells treated with these agents, we
found that down-regulation of phospho-Akt (P-Akt) played a key role in
mediating TRAIL sensitization of bortezomib. The first evidence was that
bortezomib down-regulated P-Akt in a dose- and time-dependent manner in
TRAIL-treated HCC cells. Second, , a PI3K inhibitor, also sensitized
resistant HCC cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Third, knocking down Akt1 by
small interference RNA also enhanced TRAIL-induced apoptosis in Huh-7 cells.
Finally, ectopic expression of mutant Akt (constitutive active) in HCC cells
abolished TRAIL sensitization effect of bortezomib. Moreover, okadaic acid, a
protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) inhibitor, reversed down-regulation of P-Akt in
bortezomib-treated cells, and PP2A knockdown by small interference RNA also
reduced apoptosis induced by the combination of TRAIL and bortezomib,
indicating that PP2A may be important in mediating the effect of bortezomib on
TRAIL sensitization. Together, bortezomib overcame TRAIL resistance at
clinically achievable concentrations in hepatocellular carcinoma cells, and
this effect is mediated at least partly via inhibition of the PI3K/Akt
pathway.Hepatocellular carcinoma
(HCC) LY2940022 is currently
the fifth most common solid tumor worldwide and the fourth leading cause of
cancer-related death. To date, surgery is still the only curative treatment
but is only feasible in a small portion of patients
(1). Drug treatment is the
major therapy for patients with advanced stage disease. Unfortunately, the
response rate to traditional chemotherapy for HCC patients is unsatisfactory
(1). Novel pharmacological
therapy is urgently needed for patients with advanced HCC. In this regard, the
approval of sorafenib might open a new era of molecularly targeted therapy in
the treatment of HCC patients.Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), a
type II transmembrane protein and a member of the TNF family, is a promising
anti-tumor agent under clinical investigation
(2). TRAIL functions by
engaging its receptors expressed on the surface of target cells. Five
receptors specific for TRAIL have been identified, including DR4/TRAIL-R1,
DR5/TRAIL-R2, DcR1, DcR2, and osteoprotegerin. Among TRAIL receptors, only DR4
and DR5 contain an effective death domain that is essential to formation of
death-inducing signaling complex (DISC), a critical step for TRAIL-induced
apoptosis. Notably, the trimerization of the death domains recruits an adaptor
molecule, Fas-associated protein with death domain (FADD), which subsequently
recruits and activates caspase-8. In type I cells, activation of caspase-8 is
sufficient to activate caspase-3 to induce apoptosis; however, in another type
of cells (type II), the intrinsic mitochondrial pathway is essential for
apoptosis characterized by cleavage of Bid and release of cytochrome
c from mitochondria, which subsequently activates caspase-9 and
caspase-3 (3).Although TRAIL induces apoptosis in malignant cells but sparing normal
cells, some tumor cells are resistant to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Mechanisms
responsible for the resistance include receptors and intracellular resistance.
Although the cell surface expression of DR4 or DR5 is absolutely required for
TRAIL-induced apoptosis, tumor cells expressing these death receptors are not
always sensitive to TRAIL due to intracellular mechanisms. For example, the
cellular FLICE-inhibitory protein (c-FLIP), a homologue to caspase-8 but
without protease activity, has been linked to TRAIL resistance in several
studies (4,
5). In addition, inactivation
of Bax, a proapoptotic Bcl-2 family protein, resulted in resistance to TRAIL
in MMR-deficient tumors (6,
7), and reintroduction of Bax
into Bax-deficient cells restored TRAIL sensitivity
(8), indicating that the Bcl-2
family plays a critical role in intracellular mechanisms for resistance of
TRAIL.Bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor approved clinically for multiple myeloma
and mantle cell lymphoma, has been investigated intensively for many types of
cancer (9). Accumulating
studies indicate that the combination of bortezomib and TRAIL overcomes the
resistance to TRAIL in various types of cancer, including acute myeloid
leukemia (4), lymphoma
(10–13),
prostate
(14–17),
colon (15,
18,
19), bladder
(14,
16), renal cell carcinoma
(20), thyroid
(21), ovary
(22), non-small cell lung
(23,
24), sarcoma
(25), and HCC
(26,
27). Molecular targets
responsible for the sensitizing effect of bortezomib on TRAIL-induced cell
death include DR4 (14,
27), DR5
(14,
20,
22–23,
28), c-FLIP
(4,
11,
21–23,
29), NF-κB
(12,
24,
30), p21
(16,
21,
25), and p27
(25). In addition, Bcl-2
family also plays a role in the combinational effect of bortezomib and TRAIL,
including Bcl-2 (10,
21), Bax
(13,
22), Bak
(27), Bcl-xL
(21), Bik
(18), and Bim
(15).Recently, we have reported that Akt signaling is a major molecular
determinant in bortezomib-induced apoptosis in HCC cells
(31). In this study, we
demonstrated that bortezomib overcame TRAIL resistance in HCC cells through
inhibition of the PI3K/Akt pathway. 相似文献
10.
11.
Ivana I. Knezevic Sanda A. Predescu Radu F. Neamu Matvey S. Gorovoy Nebojsa M. Knezevic Cordus Easington Asrar B. Malik Dan N. Predescu 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(8):5381-5394
It is known that platelet-activating factor (PAF) induces severe
endothelial barrier leakiness, but the signaling mechanisms remain unclear.
Here, using a wide range of biochemical and morphological approaches applied
in both mouse models and cultured endothelial cells, we addressed the
mechanisms of PAF-induced disruption of interendothelial junctions (IEJs) and
of increased endothelial permeability. The formation of interendothelial gaps
filled with filopodia and lamellipodia is the cellular event responsible for
the disruption of endothelial barrier. We observed that PAF ligation of its
receptor induced the activation of the Rho GTPase Rac1. Following PAF
exposure, both Rac1 and its guanine nucleotide exchange factor Tiam1 were
found associated with a membrane fraction from which they
co-immunoprecipitated with PAF receptor. In the same time frame with
Tiam1-Rac1 translocation, the junctional proteins ZO-1 and VE-cadherin were
relocated from the IEJs, and formation of numerous interendothelial gaps was
recorded. Notably, the response was independent of myosin light chain
phosphorylation and thus distinct from other mediators, such as histamine and
thrombin. The changes in actin status are driven by the PAF-induced localized
actin polymerization as a consequence of Rac1 translocation and activation.
Tiam1 was required for the activation of Rac1, actin polymerization,
relocation of junctional associated proteins, and disruption of IEJs. Thus,
PAF-induced IEJ disruption and increased endothelial permeability requires the
activation of a Tiam1-Rac1 signaling module, suggesting a novel therapeutic
target against increased vascular permeability associated with inflammatory
diseases.The endothelial barrier is made up of endothelial cells
(ECs)4 connected to
each other by interendothelial junctions (IEJs) consisting of protein
complexes organized as tight junctions (TJs) and adherens junctions (AJs). In
addition, the focal adhesion complex located at the basal plasma membrane
enables firm contact of ECs with the underlying basement membrane and also
contributes to the barrier function
(1-3).
The glycocalyx, the endothelial monolayer, and the basement membrane all
together constitute the vascular barrier.The structural integrity of the ECs along with their proper functionality
are the two most important factors controlling the tightness of the
endothelial barrier. Changes affecting these factors cause loss of barrier
restrictiveness and leakiness. Therefore, defining and understanding the
cellular and molecular mechanisms controlling these processes is of paramount
importance. Increased width of IEJs in response to permeability-increasing
mediators (4) regulates the
magnitude of transendothelial exchange of fluid and solutes. Disruption of
IEJs and the resultant barrier leakiness contribute to the genesis of diverse
pathological conditions, such as inflammation
(5), metastasis
(6,
7), and uncontrolled
angiogenesis (8,
9).Accumulated evidence demonstrated that IEJs changes are responsible for
increased or decreased vascular permeability, and the generally accepted
mechanism responsible for them was the myosin light chain (MLC)-mediated
contraction of ECs (5,
10). However, published
evidence showed that an increase in vascular permeability could be obtained
without a direct involvement of any contractile mechanism
(11-16).The main component of the vascular barrier, the ECs, has more than 10% of
their total protein represented by actin
(17), which under
physiological salt concentrations subsists as monomers (G-actin) and assembled
into filaments (F-actin). A large number of actin-interacting proteins may
modulate the assembly, disassembly, and organization of G-actin and of actin
filaments within a given cell type. Similar to the complexity of
actin-interacting proteins found in other cell types, the ECs utilize their
actin binding proteins to stabilize the endothelial monolayer in order to
efficiently function as a selective barrier
(11). In undisturbed ECs, the
actin microfilaments are organized as different networks with distinctive
functional and morphological characteristics: the peripheral filaments also
known as peripheral dense band (PDB), the cytoplasmic fibers identified as
stress fibers (SF), and the actin from the membrane cytoskeleton
(18). The peripheral web,
localized immediately under the membrane, is associated with (i) the luminal
plasmalemma (on the apical side), (ii) the IEJ complexes on the lateral
surfaces, and (iii) the focal adhesion complexes on the abluminal side (the
basal part) of polarized ECs. The SF reside inside the endothelial cytoplasm
and are believed to be directly connected with the plasmalemma proper on the
luminal as well as on the abluminal side of the cell. As described, the
endothelial actin cytoskeleton (specifically the SF) seems to be a stable
structure helping the cells to remain flat under flow
(19). It is also established
that the actin fibers participate in correct localization of different
junctional complexes while keeping them in place
(20). However, it was
suggested that the dynamic equilibrium between F- and G-actin might modulate
the tightness of endothelial barrier in response to different challenges
(13).Mediators effective at nanomolar concentrations or less that disrupt the
endothelial barrier and increase vascular permeability include C2 toxin of
Clostridium botulinum, vascular permeability factor, better known as
vascular endothelial growth factor, and PAF
(21). C2 toxin increases
endothelial permeability by ribosylating monomeric G-actin at Arg-177
(22). This results in the
impairment of actin polymerization
(23), followed by rounding of
ECs (16) and the disruption of
junctional integrity. Vascular permeability factor was shown to open IEJs by
redistribution of junctional proteins
(24,
25) and by interfering with
the equilibrium of actin pools
(26). PAF
(1-O-alkyl-2-acetyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocoline), a naturally
synthesized phospholipid is active at 10-10 m or less
(27). PAF is synthesized by
and acts on a variety of cell types, including platelets
(28), neutrophils
(29), monocytes
(30), and ECs
(31). PAF-mediated activation
of ECs induced cell migration
(32), angiogenesis
(7), and vascular
hyperpermeability (33)
secondary to disassembly of IEJs
(34). The effects of PAF on
the endothelium are initiated through a G protein-coupled receptor (PAF-R)
localized at the plasmalemma, in a large endosomal compartment inside the cell
(34), and also in the nuclear
membrane (35). In ECs, PAF-R
was shown to signal through Gαq and downstream activation of
phospholipase C isozymes (PLCβ3 and PLCγ1),
and via cSrc (32,
36). Studies have shown that
PAF challenge induced endothelial actin cytoskeletal rearrangement
(37) and marked vascular
leakiness (38); however, the
signaling pathways have not been elucidated.Therefore, in the present study, we carried out a systematic analysis of
PAF-induced morphological and biochemical changes of endothelial barrier
in vivo and in cultured ECs. We found that the opening of endothelial
barrier and the increased vascular leakiness induced by PAF are the result of
a shift in actin pools without involvement of EC contraction, followed by a
redistribution of tight junctional associated protein ZO-1 and adherens
junctional protein VE-cadherin. 相似文献
12.
Motoki Takaku Shinichi Machida Noriko Hosoya Shugo Nakayama Yoshimasa Takizawa Isao Sakane Takehiko Shibata Kiyoshi Miyagawa Hitoshi Kurumizaka 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(21):14326-14336
The RAD51 protein is a central player in homologous recombinational repair.
The RAD51B protein is one of five RAD51 paralogs that function in the
homologous recombinational repair pathway in higher eukaryotes. In the present
study, we found that the human EVL (Ena/Vasp-like) protein, which is suggested
to be involved in actin-remodeling processes, unexpectedly binds to the RAD51
and RAD51B proteins and stimulates the RAD51-mediated homologous pairing and
strand exchange. The EVL knockdown cells impaired RAD51 assembly onto damaged
DNA after ionizing radiation or mitomycin C treatment. The EVL protein alone
promotes single-stranded DNA annealing, and the recombination activities of
the EVL protein are further enhanced by the RAD51B protein. The expression of
the EVL protein is not ubiquitous, but it is significantly expressed in breast
cancer-derived MCF7 cells. These results suggest that the EVL protein is a
novel recombination factor that may be required for repairing specific DNA
lesions, and that may cause tumor malignancy by its inappropriate
expression.Chromosomal DNA double strand breaks
(DSBs)2 are potential
inducers of chromosomal aberrations and tumorigenesis, and they are accurately
repaired by the homologous recombinational repair (HRR) pathway, without base
substitutions, deletions, and insertions
(1–3).
In the HRR pathway (4,
5), single-stranded DNA (ssDNA)
tails are produced at the DSB sites. The RAD51 protein, a eukaryotic homologue
of the bacterial RecA protein, binds to the ssDNA tail and forms a helical
nucleoprotein filament. The RAD51-ssDNA filament then binds to the intact
double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) to form a three-component complex, containing
ssDNA, dsDNA, and the RAD51 protein. In this three-component complex, the
RAD51 protein promotes recombination reactions, such as homologous pairing and
strand exchange
(6–9).The RAD51 protein requires auxiliary proteins to promote the homologous
pairing and strand exchange reactions efficiently in cells
(10–12).
In humans, the RAD52, RAD54, and RAD54B proteins directly interact with the
RAD51 protein
(13–17)
and stimulate the RAD51-mediated homologous pairing and/or strand exchange
reactions in vitro
(18–21).
The human RAD51AP1 protein, which directly binds to the RAD51 protein
(22), was also found to
stimulate RAD51-mediated homologous pairing in vitro
(23,
24). The BRCA2 protein
contains ssDNA-binding, dsDNA-binding, and RAD51-binding motifs
(25–33),
and the Ustilago maydis BRCA2 ortholog, Brh2, reportedly stimulated
RAD51-mediated strand exchange
(34,
35). Most of these
RAD51-interacting factors are known to be required for efficient RAD51
assembly onto DSB sites in cells treated with ionizing radiation
(10–12).The RAD51B (RAD51L1, Rec2) protein is a member of the RAD51 paralogs, which
share about 20–30% amino acid sequence similarity with the RAD51 protein
(36–38).
RAD51B-deficient cells are hypersensitive to DSB-inducing agents,
such as cisplatin, mitomycin C (MMC), and γ-rays, indicating that the
RAD51B protein is involved in the HRR pathway
(39–44).
Genetic experiments revealed that RAD51B-deficient cells exhibited
impaired RAD51 assembly onto DSB sites
(39,
44), suggesting that the
RAD51B protein functions in the early stage of the HRR pathway. Biochemical
experiments also suggested that the RAD51B protein participates in the early
to late stages of the HRR pathway
(45–47).In the present study, we found that the human EVL (Ena/Vasp-like) protein
binds to the RAD51 and RAD51B proteins in a HeLa cell extract. The EVL protein
is known to be involved in cytoplasmic actin remodeling
(48) and is also overexpressed
in breast cancer (49). Like
the RAD51B knockdown cells, the EVL knockdown cells partially impaired RAD51
foci formation after DSB induction, suggesting that the EVL protein enhances
RAD51 assembly onto DSB sites. The purified EVL protein preferentially bound
to ssDNA and stimulated RAD51-mediated homologous pairing and strand exchange.
The EVL protein also promoted the annealing of complementary strands. These
recombination reactions that were stimulated or promoted by the EVL protein
were further enhanced by the RAD51B protein. These results strongly suggested
that the EVL protein is a novel factor that activates RAD51-mediated
recombination reactions, probably with the RAD51B protein. We anticipate that,
in addition to its involvement in cytoplasmic actin dynamics, the EVL protein
may be required in homologous recombination for repairing specific DNA
lesions, and it may cause tumor malignancy by inappropriate recombination
enhanced by EVL overexpression in certain types of tumor cells. 相似文献
13.
14.
15.
Christopher P. Gayer Lakshmi S. Chaturvedi Shouye Wang David H. Craig Thomas Flanigan Marc D. Basson 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(4):2001-2011
The intestinal epithelium is repetitively deformed by shear, peristalsis,
and villous motility. Such repetitive deformation stimulates the proliferation
of intestinal epithelial cells on collagen or laminin substrates via ERK, but
the upstream mediators of this effect are poorly understood. We hypothesized
that the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT cascade mediates this
mitogenic effect. PI3K, AKT, and glycogen synthase kinase-3β
(GSK-3β) were phosphorylated by 10 cycles/min strain at an average 10%
deformation, and pharmacologic blockade of these molecules or reduction by
small interfering RNA (siRNA) prevented the mitogenic effect of strain in
Caco-2 or IEC-6 intestinal epithelial cells. Strain MAPK activation required
PI3K but not AKT. AKT isoform-specific siRNA transfection demonstrated that
AKT2 but not AKT1 is required for GSK-3β phosphorylation and the strain
mitogenic effect. Furthermore, overexpression of AKT1 or an AKT chimera
including the PH domain and hinge region of AKT2 and the catalytic domain and
C-tail of AKT1 prevented strain activation of GSK-3β, but overexpression
of AKT2 or a chimera including the PH domain and hinge region of AKT1 and the
catalytic domain and C-tail of AKT2 did not. These data delineate a role for
PI3K, AKT2, and GSK-3β in the mitogenic effect of strain. PI3K is
required for both ERK and AKT2 activation, whereas AKT2 is sequentially
required for GSK-3β. Furthermore, AKT2 specificity requires its catalytic
domain and tail region. Manipulating this pathway may prevent mucosal atrophy
and maintain the mucosal barrier in conditions such as ileus, sepsis, and
prolonged fasting when peristalsis and villous motility are decreased and the
mucosal barrier fails.Mechanical forces are part of the normal intestinal epithelial environment.
Numerous different forces deform these cells including shear stress from
endoluminal chyme, bowel peristalsis, and villous motility
(1,
2). During normal bowel
function the mucosa is subjected to injury that must be repaired to maintain
the mucosal barrier (3,
4). Deformation patterns of the
bowel are altered in conditions such as prolonged fasting, post-surgical
ileus, and sepsis states, resulting in profoundly reduced mucosal deformation.
When such states are prolonged, proliferation slows, the mucosa becomes
atrophic, and bacterial translocation may ensue as the mucosal barrier of the
gut breaks down
(5–7).In vitro, repetitive deformation is trophic for intestinal
epithelial cells (8) cultured
on type I or type IV collagen or laminin. Human Caco-2 intestinal epithelial
cells (9), non-transformed rat
IEC-6 intestinal epithelial cells
(10), and primary human
intestinal epithelial cells isolated from surgical specimens
(11) proliferate more rapidly
in response to cyclic strain
(12) unless substantial
quantities of fibronectin are added to the media or matrix
(11) to mimic the acute phase
reaction of acute or chronic inflammation and injury. Cyclic strain also
stimulates proliferation in HCT 116 colon cancer cells
(13) and differentiation of
Caco-2 cells cultured on a collagen substrate
(9). This phenomenon has also
been observed in vivo
(14). Thus, repetitive
deformation may help to maintain the normal homeostasis of the gut mucosa
under non-inflammatory conditions. Previous work in our laboratory has
implicated Src, focal adhesion kinase, and the mitogen-activated protein
kinase (MAPK)2
extracellular signal-related kinase (ERK) in the mitogenic effect of strain
(10). Although p38 is also
activated in Caco-2 cells subjected to cyclic strain on a collagen matrix, its
activity is not required for the mitogenic effect of strain
(12).Although often the PI3K/AKT pathway is thought of as a parallel pathway to
the MAPK, this is not always the case. Protein kinase C isoenzymes
differentially modulate thrombin effect on MAPK-dependent retinal pigment
epithelial cell (RPE) proliferation, and it has been shown that PI3K or AKT
inhibition prevented thrombin-induced ERK activation and RPE proliferation
(15).PI3K, AKT, and glycogen synthase kinase (GSK), a downstream target of AKT
(16), have been implemented in
intestinal epithelial cell proliferation in numerous cell systems not
involving strain
(17–19)
including uncontrolled proliferation in gastrointestinal cancers
(20–22).
Mechanical forces activate this pathway as well. PI3K and AKT are required for
increased extracellular pressure to stimulate colon cancer cell adhesion
(23), although the pathway by
which pressure stimulates colon cancer cells in suspension differs from the
response of adherent intestinal epithelial cells to repetitive deformation
(24), and GSK is not involved
in this effect.3
Repetitive strain also stimulates vascular endothelial cell proliferation via
PI3K and AKT (25,
26), whereas respiratory
strain stimulates angiogenic responses via PI3K
(27). We, therefore,
hypothesized that the PI3K/AKT/GSK axis would be involved in the mitogenic
effects of repetitive deformation on a collagen matrix.To test this hypothesis, we used the Flexcell apparatus to rhythmically
deform Caco-2 intestinal epithelial cells. IEC-6 cells were used to confirm
key results. A frequency of 10 cycles per min was used, which is similar in
order of magnitude to the frequency that the intestinal mucosa might be
deformed by peristalsis or villous motility in vivo
(28,
29). Mechanical forces such as
repetitive deformation are likely cell-type and frequency-specific, as
different cell types respond to different frequencies. Vascular endothelial
cells respond to frequencies of 60–80 cycles/min
(25), whereas intestinal
epithelial cells may actually decrease proliferation in response to
frequencies of 5 cycles/min
(30). We characterized PI3K,
AKT, and GSK phosphorylation with strain, blocked these molecules
pharmacologically or by siRNA, and delineated the specificity of the AKT
effect using isozyme-specific siRNA and transfection of AKT1/2 chimeras. We
also characterized the interaction of this pathway with the activation of ERK
by strain, which has previously been implicated in the mitogenic response
(12). 相似文献
16.
S��bastien Thomas Brigitte Ritter David Verbich Claire Sanson Lyne Bourbonni��re R. Anne McKinney Peter S. McPherson 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(18):12410-12419
Intersectin-short (intersectin-s) is a multimodule scaffolding protein
functioning in constitutive and regulated forms of endocytosis in non-neuronal
cells and in synaptic vesicle (SV) recycling at the neuromuscular junction of
Drosophila and Caenorhabditis elegans. In vertebrates,
alternative splicing generates a second isoform, intersectin-long
(intersectin-l), that contains additional modular domains providing a guanine
nucleotide exchange factor activity for Cdc42. In mammals, intersectin-s is
expressed in multiple tissues and cells, including glia, but excluded from
neurons, whereas intersectin-l is a neuron-specific isoform. Thus,
intersectin-I may regulate multiple forms of endocytosis in mammalian neurons,
including SV endocytosis. We now report, however, that intersectin-l is
localized to somatodendritic regions of cultured hippocampal neurons, with
some juxtanuclear accumulation, but is excluded from synaptophysin-labeled
axon terminals. Consistently, intersectin-l knockdown (KD) does not affect SV
recycling. Instead intersectin-l co-localizes with clathrin heavy chain and
adaptor protein 2 in the somatodendritic region of neurons, and its KD reduces
the rate of transferrin endocytosis. The protein also co-localizes with
F-actin at dendritic spines, and intersectin-l KD disrupts spine maturation
during development. Our data indicate that intersectin-l is indeed an
important regulator of constitutive endocytosis and neuronal development but
that it is not a prominent player in the regulated endocytosis of SVs.Clathrin-mediated endocytosis
(CME)4 is a
major mechanism by which cells take up nutrients, control the surface levels
of multiple proteins, including ion channels and transporters, and regulate
the coupling of signaling receptors to downstream signaling cascades
(1-5).
In neurons, CME takes on additional specialized roles; it is an important
process regulating synaptic vesicle (SV) availability through endocytosis and
recycling of SV membranes (6,
7), it shapes synaptic
plasticity
(8-10),
and it is crucial in maintaining synaptic membranes and membrane structure
(11).Numerous endocytic accessory proteins participate in CME, interacting with
each other and with core components of the endocytic machinery such as
clathrin heavy chain (CHC) and adaptor protein-2 (AP-2) through specific
modules and peptide motifs
(12). One such module is the
Eps15 homology domain that binds to proteins bearing NPF motifs
(13,
14). Another is the Src
homology 3 (SH3) domain, which binds to proline-rich domains in protein
partners (15). Intersectin is
a multimodule scaffolding protein that interacts with a wide range of
proteins, including several involved in CME
(16). Intersectin has two
N-terminal Eps15 homology domains that are responsible for binding to epsin,
SCAMP1, and numb
(17-19),
a central coil-coiled domain that interacts with Eps15 and SNAP-23 and -25
(17,
20,
21), and five SH3 domains in
its C-terminal region that interact with multiple proline-rich domain
proteins, including synaptojanin, dynamin, N-WASP, CdGAP, and mSOS
(16,
22-25).
The rich binding capability of intersectin has linked it to various functions
from CME (17,
26,
27) and signaling
(22,
28,
29) to mitogenesis
(30,
31) and regulation of the
actin cytoskeleton (23).Intersectin functions in SV recycling at the neuromuscular junction of
Drosophila and C. elegans where it acts as a scaffold,
regulating the synaptic levels of endocytic accessory proteins
(21,
32-34).
In vertebrates, the intersectin gene is subject to alternative splicing, and a
longer isoform (intersectin-l) is generated that is expressed exclusively in
neurons (26,
28,
35,
36). This isoform has all the
binding modules of its short (intersectin-s) counterpart but also has
additional domains: a DH and a PH domain that provide guanine nucleotide
exchange factor (GEF) activity specific for Cdc42
(23,
37) and a C2 domain at the C
terminus. Through its GEF activity and binding to actin regulatory proteins,
including N-WASP, intersectin-l has been implicated in actin regulation and
the development of dendritic spines
(19,
23,
24). In addition, because the
rest of the binding modules are shared between intersectin-s and -l, it is
generally thought that the two intersectin isoforms have the same endocytic
functions. In particular, given the well defined role for the invertebrate
orthologs of intersectin-s in SV endocytosis, it is thought that intersectin-l
performs this role in mammalian neurons, which lack intersectin-s. Defining
the complement of intersectin functional activities in mammalian neurons is
particularly relevant given that the protein is involved in the
pathophysiology of Down syndrome (DS). Specifically, the intersectin gene is
localized on chromosome 21q22.2 and is overexpressed in DS brains
(38). Interestingly,
alterations in endosomal pathways are a hallmark of DS neurons and neurons
from the partial trisomy 16 mouse, Ts65Dn, a model for DS
(39,
40). Thus, an endocytic
trafficking defect may contribute to the DS disease process.Here, the functional roles of intersectin-l were studied in cultured
hippocampal neurons. We find that intersectin-l is localized to the
somatodendritic regions of neurons, where it co-localizes with CHC and AP-2
and regulates the uptake of transferrin. Intersectin-l also co-localizes with
actin at dendritic spines and disrupting intersectin-l function alters
dendritic spine development. In contrast, intersectin-l is absent from
presynaptic terminals and has little or no role in SV recycling. 相似文献
17.
18.
Yang Wang Dan Li Roza Nurieva Justin Yang Mehmet Sen Roberto Carre?o Sijie Lu Bradley W. McIntyre Jeffrey J. Molldrem Glen B. Legge Qing Ma 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(19):12645-12653
The activation of LFA-1 (lymphocyte function-associated antigen) is a
critical event for T cell co-stimulation. The mechanism of LFA-1 activation
involves both affinity and avidity regulation, but the role of each in T cell
activation remains unclear. We have identified antibodies that recognize and
block different affinity states of the mouse LFA-1 I-domain. Monoclonal
antibody 2D7 preferentially binds to the low affinity conformation, and this
specific binding is abolished when LFA-1 is locked in the high affinity
conformation. In contrast, M17/4 can bind both the locked high and low
affinity forms of LFA-1. Although both 2D7 and M17/4 are blocking antibodies,
2D7 is significantly less potent than M17/4 in blocking LFA-1-mediated
adhesion; thus, blocking high affinity LFA-1 is critical for preventing
LFA-1-mediated adhesion. Using these reagents, we investigated whether LFA-1
affinity regulation affects T cell activation. We found that blocking high
affinity LFA-1 prevents interleukin-2 production and T cell proliferation,
demonstrated by TCR cross-linking and antigen-specific stimulation.
Furthermore, there is a differential requirement of high affinity LFA-1 in the
activation of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Although
CD4+ T cell activation depends on both high and low affinity LFA-1,
only high affinity LFA-1 provides co-stimulation for CD8+ T cell
activation. Together, our data demonstrated that the I-domain of LFA-1 changes
to the high affinity state in primary T cells, and high affinity LFA-1 is
critical for facilitating T cell activation. This implicates LFA-1 activation
as a novel regulatory mechanism for the modulation of T cell activation and
proliferation.LFA-1 (lymphocyte function-associated antigen), an integrin family member,
is important in regulating leukocyte adhesion and T cell activation
(1,
2). LFA-1 consists of the
αL (CD11a) and β2 (CD18) heterodimer. The
ligands for LFA-1, including intercellular adhesion molecule
ICAM3-1, ICAM-2, and
ICAM-3, are expressed on antigen-presenting cells (APCs), endothelial cells,
and lymphocytes (1). Mice that
are deficient in LFA-1 have defects in leukocyte adhesion, lymphocyte
proliferation, and tumor rejection
(3–5).
Blocking LFA-1 with antibodies can prevent inflammation, autoimmunity, organ
graft rejection, and graft versus host disease in human and murine
models
(6–10).LFA-1 is constitutively expressed on the surface of leukocytes in an
inactive state. Activation of LFA-1 is mediated by inside-out signals from the
cytoplasm (1,
11). Subsequently, activated
LFA-1 binds to the ligands and transduces outside-in signals back into the
cytoplasm that result in cell adhesion and activation
(12,
13). The activation of LFA-1
is a critical event in the formation of the immunological synapse, which is
important for T cell activation
(2,
14,
15). The active state of LFA-1
is regulated by chemokines and the T cell receptor (TCR) through Rap1
signaling (16). LFA-1 ligation
lowers the activation threshold and affects polarization in CD4+ T
cells (17). Moreover,
productive LFA-1 engagement facilitates efficient activation of cytotoxic T
lymphocytes and initiates a distinct signal essential for the effector
function
(18–20).
Thus, LFA-1 activation is essential for the optimal activation of T cells.The mechanism of LFA-1 activation involves both affinity (conformational
changes within the molecule) and avidity (receptor clustering) regulation
(21–23).
The I-domain of the LFA-1 αL subunit is the primary
ligand-binding site and has been proposed to change conformation, leading to
an increased affinity for ligands
(24–26).
The structural basis of the conformational changes in the I-domain of LFA-1
has been extensively characterized
(27). Previously, we have
demonstrated that the conformation of the LFA-1 I-domain changes from the low
affinity to the high affinity state upon activation. By introducing disulfide
bonds into the I-domain, LFA-1 can be locked in either the closed or open
conformation, which represents the “low affinity” or “high
affinity” state, respectively
(28,
29). In addition, we
identified antibodies that are sensitive to the affinity changes in the
I-domain of human LFA-1 and showed that the activation-dependent epitopes are
exposed upon activation (30).
This study supports the presence of the high affinity conformation upon LFA-1
activation in cell lines. It has been demonstrated recently that therapeutic
antagonists, such as statins, inhibit LFA-1 activation and immune responses by
locking LFA-1 in the low affinity state
(31–34).
Furthermore, high affinity LFA-1 has been shown to be important for mediating
the adhesion of human T cells
(35,
36). Thus, the affinity
regulation is a critical step in LFA-1 activation.LFA-1 is a molecule of great importance in the immune system, and its
activation state influences the outcome of T cell activation. Our previous
data using the activating LFA-1 I-domain-specific antibody MEM83 indicate that
avidity and affinity of the integrin can be coupled during activation
(37). However, whether
affinity or avidity regulation of LFA-1 contributes to T cell activation
remains controversial (23,
38,
39). Despite the recent
progress suggesting that conformational changes represent a key step in the
activation of LFA-1, there are considerable gaps to be filled. When LFA-1 is
activated, the subsequent outside-in signaling contributes to T cell
activation via immunological synapse and LFA-1-dependent signaling. It is
critical to determine whether high affinity LFA-1 participates in the
outside-in signaling and affects the cellular activation of T cells.
Nevertheless, the rapid and dynamic process of LFA-1 activation has hampered
further understanding of the role of high affinity LFA-1 in primary T cell
activation. The affinity of LFA-1 for ICAM-1 increases up to 10,000-fold
within seconds and involves multiple reversible steps
(23). In addition, the
activation of LFA-1 regulates both adhesion and activation of T cells, two
separate yet closely associated cellular functions. When LFA-1 is
constitutively expressed in the active state in mice, immune responses are
broadly impaired rather than hyperactivated, suggesting the complexity of
affinity regulation (40).
Therefore, it is difficult to dissect the mechanisms by which high affinity
LFA-1 regulates stepwise activation of T cells in the whole animal system.In the present study, we identified antibodies recognizing and blocking
different affinity states of mouse LFA-1. These reagents allowed us to
determine the role of affinity regulation in T cell activation. We found that
blocking high affinity LFA-1 inhibited IL-2 production and proliferation in T
cells. Furthermore, there is a differential requirement of high affinity LFA-1
in antigen-specific activation of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells.
The activation of CD4+ T cells depends on both high and low
affinity LFA-1. For CD8+ T cell activation, only high affinity
LFA-1 provides co-stimulation. Thus, affinity regulation of LFA-1 is critical
for the activation and proliferation of naive T cells. 相似文献
19.
Ryan P. Topping John C. Wilkinson Karin Drotschmann Scarpinato 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(21):14029-14039
Mismatch repair (MMR) proteins participate in cytotoxicity induced by
certain DNA damage-inducing agents, including cisplatin
(cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II), CDDP), a cancer chemotherapeutic
drug utilized clinically to treat a variety of malignancies. MMR proteins have
been demonstrated to bind to CDDP-DNA adducts and initiate MMR
protein-dependent cell death in cells treated with CDDP; however, the
molecular events underlying this death remain unclear. As MMR proteins have
been suggested to be important in clinical responses to CDDP, a clear
understanding of MMR protein-dependent, CDDP-induced cell death is critical.
In this report, we demonstrate MMR protein-dependent relocalization of
cytochrome c to the cytoplasm and cleavage of caspase-9, caspase-3,
and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase upon treatment of cells with CDDP. Chemical
inhibition of caspases specifically attenuates CDDP/MMR protein-dependent
cytotoxicity, suggesting that a caspase-dependent signaling mechanism is
required for the execution of this cell death. p53 protein levels were
up-regulated independently of MMR protein status, suggesting that p53 is not a
mediator of MMR-dependent, CDDP-induced death. This work is the first
indication of a required signaling mechanism in CDDP-induced, MMR
protein-dependent cytotoxicity, which can be uncoupled from other CDDP
response pathways, and defines a critical contribution of MMR proteins to the
control of cell death.The MMR2 system of
proteins plays roles in diverse cellular processes, perhaps most notably in
preserving genomic integrity by recognizing and facilitating the repair of
post-DNA replication base pairing errors. Recognition of these errors and
recruitment of repair machinery is performed by the MutSα complex
(consisting of the MMR proteins MSH2 and MSH6) or MutSβ complex
(consisting of MSH2 and MSH3). Defects in MMR proteins render cells
hypermutable and promote microsatellite instability, a hallmark of MMR
defects. MMR protein defects are found in a wide variety of sporadic cancers,
as well as in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer
(1).In addition to their role in DNA repair, MMR proteins also play a role in
cytotoxicity induced by specific types of DNA-damaging chemotherapeutic drugs,
such as CDDP, which is utilized clinically to treat a number of different
cancer types. MutSα recognizes multiple types of DNA damage, including
1,2-intrastrand CDDP adducts and O6-methylguanine lesions
(2). Treatment of cells with
compounds that induce these types of lesions, including CDDP and methylating
agents such as
N-methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG),
results in MMR protein-dependent cell cycle arrest and cell death
(3–7).
This suggests that MMR proteins, in addition to their role in DNA repair, are
also capable of initiating cell death in response to certain types of DNA
damage.Cells treated with DNA-damaging agents frequently activate an apoptotic
cell death pathway mediated by the mitochondria. This intrinsic death
signaling pathway predominantly involves the coordinated activity of two
groups of proteins: pro-death members of the Bcl-2 family that control the
integrity of mitochondrial membranes, and members of the caspase family of
cysteinyl proteases that proteolytically cleave intracellular substrates,
giving rise to apoptotic morphology and destruction of the cell
(8,
9). Pro-death Bcl-2 family
members, such as Bax and Bak, target the outer mitochondrial membrane and
cause the cytosolic release of pro-death factors residing within the
mitochondria of unstressed cells
(8). Predominant among these
factors is cytochrome c, whose cytoplasmic localization results in
the formation of a caspase-activating platform known as the apoptosome
(10). This complex includes
the adaptor protein Apaf-1, and when formed the apoptosome promotes the
cleavage and activation of caspase-9
(11,
12). Once activated, this
apical caspase proceeds to cleave and activate caspase-3, the predominant
effector protease of apoptosis.A significant amount of evidence has been gathered illustrating MMR
protein-dependent pro-death signaling in response to methylating agents
(13–16,
3). In contrast, the MMR
protein-dependent cytotoxic response to CDDP is largely unknown, with only the
p53-related transactivator protein p73 and the c-Abl kinase clearly implicated
as potential mediators of CDDP/MMR protein-dependent cell death in human cells
(17,
18). Interestingly, ATM, Chk1,
Chk2, and p53, which are activated in an MMR protein-dependent manner after
treatment of cells with MNNG
(3,
13), are not involved in the
MMR-dependent response to CDDP
(7,
17). In addition, the
magnitude of MMR protein-dependent cell death induced by methylating agents
and CDDP differs (4). These
findings suggest that unique signaling pathways may be engaged by MMR proteins
depending upon the type of recognized lesion. As such, there is a requirement
for further study of the molecular events underlying MMR protein-dependent
cell death and cell cycle arrest for each type of recognized DNA lesion. This
is particularly relevant in the case of CDDP, as evidence from a limited
number of retrospective clinical studies suggests that MMR proteins play an
important role in patient response to CDDP. Several studies examining
immunohistochemical staining against MSH2 or MLH1 have demonstrated that
levels of these proteins are reduced in ovarian and esophageal tumor samples
following CDDP-based chemotherapy
(19,
20). Low levels of MMR protein
post-chemotherapy seem to be predictive of lower overall survival in a certain
subset of tumors (esophageal cancer), but not others (ovarian and non-small
cell lung cancer)
(19–21).
Two recent studies examining MMR protein levels and microsatellite instability
in germ cell tumors from patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy have
suggested a prognostic value for pre-chemotherapy MMR protein status in these
tumors (22,
23). This potential clinical
relevance underscores the need for a greater understanding of MMR
protein-dependent mechanisms of CDDP-induced cell death.In this study, we report that CDDP induces an MMR protein-dependent
decrease in cell viability and MMR protein-dependent signaling in the form of
cytochrome c release to the cytoplasm and cleavage of caspase-9,
caspase-3, and PARP. Chemical inhibition of caspases specifically attenuates
CDDP/MMR protein-dependent loss of cell viability, indicating a requirement
for caspase activation in this process and uncoupling MMR protein-dependent
cytotoxic signaling from other CDDP response pathways. Additionally, the
CDDP-induced, MMR protein-dependent cytotoxic response is independent of p53
signaling. Our results demonstrate for the first time an MMR protein-dependent
pro-death signaling pathway in cells treated with CDDP. 相似文献