Specific Activation of mTORC1 by Rheb G-protein in Vitro Involves Enhanced Recruitment of Its Substrate Protein

Rheb G-protein plays critical roles in the TSC/Rheb/mTOR signaling pathway by activating mTORC1. The activation of mTORC1 by Rheb can be faithfully reproduced in vitro by using mTORC1 immunoprecipitated by the use of anti-raptor antibody from mammalian cells starved for nutrients. The low in vitro kinase activity against 4E-BP1 of this mTORC1 preparation is dramatically increased by the addition of recombinant Rheb. On the other hand, the addition of Rheb does not activate mTORC2 immunoprecipitated from mammalian cells by the use of anti-rictor antibody. The activation of mTORC1 is specific to Rheb, because other G-proteins such as KRas, RalA/B, and Cdc42 did not activate mTORC1. Both Rheb1 and Rheb2 activate mTORC1. In addition, the activation is dependent on the presence of bound GTP. We also find that the effector domain of Rheb is required for the mTORC1 activation. FKBP38, a recently proposed mediator of Rheb action, appears not to be involved in the Rheb-dependent activation of mTORC1 in vitro, because the preparation of mTORC1 that is devoid of FKBP38 is still activated by Rheb. The addition of Rheb results in a significant increase of binding of the substrate protein 4E-BP1 to mTORC1. PRAS40, a TOR signaling (TOS) motif-containing protein that competes with the binding of 4EBP1 to mTORC1, inhibits Rheb-induced activation of mTORC1. A preparation of mTORC1 that is devoid of raptor is not activated by Rheb. Rheb does not induce autophosphorylation of mTOR. These results suggest that Rheb induces alteration in the binding of 4E-BP1 with mTORC1 to regulate mTORC1 activation.Rheb defines a unique member of the Ras superfamily G-proteins (1). We have shown that Rheb proteins are conserved and are found from yeast to human (2). Although yeast and fruit fly have one Rheb, mouse and human have two Rheb proteins termed Rheb1 (or simply Rheb) and Rheb2 (RhebL1) (2). Structurally, these proteins contain G1-G5 boxes, short stretches of amino acids that define the function of the Ras superfamily G-proteins including guanine nucleotide binding (1, 3, 4). Rheb proteins have a conserved arginine at residue 15 that corresponds to residue 12 of Ras (1). The effector domain required for the binding with downstream effectors encompasses the G2 box and its adjacent sequences (1, 5). Structural analysis by x-ray crystallography further shows that the effector domain is exposed to solvent, is located close to the phosphates of GTP especially at residues 35–38, and undergoes conformational change during GTP/GDP exchange (6). In addition, all Rheb proteins end with the CAAX (C is cysteine, A is an aliphatic amino acid, and X is the C-terminal amino acid) motif that signals farnesylation. In fact, we as well as others have shown that these proteins are farnesylated (7–9).Rheb plays critical roles in the TSC/Rheb/mTOR signaling, a signaling pathway that plays central roles in regulating protein synthesis and growth in response to nutrient, energy, and growth conditions (10–14). Rheb is down-regulated by a TSC1·TSC2 complex that acts as a GTPase-activating protein for Rheb (15–19). Recent studies established that the GAP domain of TSC2 defines the functional domain for the down-regulation of Rheb (20). Mutations in the Tsc1 or Tsc2 gene lead to tuberous sclerosis whose symptoms include the appearance of benign tumors called hamartomas at different parts of the body as well as neurological symptoms (21, 22). Overexpression of Rheb results in constitutive activation of mTOR even in the absence of nutrients (15, 16). Two mTOR complexes, mTORC1 and mTORC2, have been identified (23, 24). Whereas mTORC1 is involved in protein synthesis activation mediated by S6K and 4EBP1, mTORC2 is involved in the phosphorylation of Akt in response to insulin. It has been suggested that Rheb is involved in the activation of mTORC1 but not mTORC2 (25).Although Rheb is clearly involved in the activation of mTOR, the mechanism of activation has not been established. We as well as others have suggested a model that involves the interaction of Rheb with the TOR complex (26–28). Rheb activation of mTOR kinase activity using immunoprecipitated mTORC1 was reported (29). Rheb has been shown to interact with mTOR (27, 30), and this may involve direct interaction of Rheb with the kinase domain of mTOR (27). However, this Rheb/mTOR interaction is a weak interaction and is not dependent on the presence of GTP bound to Rheb (27, 28). Recently, a different model proposing that FKBP38 (FK506-binding protein 38) mediates the activation of mTORC1 by Rheb was proposed (31, 32). In this model, FKBP38 binds mTOR and negatively regulates mTOR activity, and this negative regulation is blocked by the binding of Rheb to FKBP38. However, recent reports dispute this idea (33).To further characterize Rheb activation of mTOR, we have utilized an in vitro system that reproduces activation of mTORC1 by the addition of recombinant Rheb. We used mTORC1 immunoprecipitated from nutrient-starved cells using anti-raptor antibody and have shown that its kinase activity against 4E-BP1 is dramatically increased by the addition of recombinant Rheb. Importantly, the activation of mTORC1 is specific to Rheb and is dependent on the presence of bound GTP as well as an intact effector domain. FKBP38 is not detected in our preparation and further investigation suggests that FKBP38 is not an essential component for the activation of mTORC1 by Rheb. Our study revealed that Rheb enhances the binding of a substrate 4E-BP1 with mTORC1 rather than increasing the kinase activity of mTOR.     

Protein Kinase D Mediates Mitogenic Signaling by Gq-coupled Receptors through Protein Kinase C-independent Regulation of Activation Loop Ser744 and Ser748 Phosphorylation

Rapid protein kinase D (PKD) activation and phosphorylation via protein kinase C (PKC) have been extensively documented in many cell types cells stimulated by multiple stimuli. In contrast, little is known about the role and mechanism(s) of a recently identified sustained phase of PKD activation in response to G protein-coupled receptor agonists. To elucidate the role of biphasic PKD activation, we used Swiss 3T3 cells because PKD expression in these cells potently enhanced duration of ERK activation and DNA synthesis in response to G_q-coupled receptor agonists. Cell treatment with the preferential PKC inhibitors GF109203X or Gö6983 profoundly inhibited PKD activation induced by bombesin stimulation for <15 min but did not prevent PKD catalytic activation induced by bombesin stimulation for longer times (>60 min). The existence of sequential PKC-dependent and PKC-independent PKD activation was demonstrated in 3T3 cells stimulated with various concentrations of bombesin (0.3–10 nm) or with vasopressin, a different G_q-coupled receptor agonist. To gain insight into the mechanisms involved, we determined the phosphorylation state of the activation loop residues Ser⁷⁴⁴ and Ser⁷⁴⁸. Transphosphorylation targeted Ser⁷⁴⁴, whereas autophosphorylation was the predominant mechanism for Ser⁷⁴⁸ in cells stimulated with G_q-coupled receptor agonists. We next determined which phase of PKD activation is responsible for promoting enhanced ERK activation and DNA synthesis in response to G_q-coupled receptor agonists. We show, for the first time, that the PKC-independent phase of PKD activation mediates prolonged ERK signaling and progression to DNA synthesis in response to bombesin or vasopressin through a pathway that requires epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase activity. Thus, our results identify a novel mechanism of G_q-coupled receptor-induced mitogenesis mediated by sustained PKD activation through a PKC-independent pathway.The understanding of the mechanisms that control cell proliferation requires the identification of the molecular pathways that govern the transition of quiescent cells into the S phase of the cell cycle. In this context the activation and phosphorylation of protein kinase D (PKD),⁴ the founding member of a new protein kinase family within the Ca²⁺/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase (CAMK) group and separate from the previously identified PKCs (for review, see Ref. 1), are attracting intense attention. In unstimulated cells, PKD is in a state of low catalytic (kinase) activity maintained by autoinhibition mediated by the N-terminal domain, a region containing a repeat of cysteinerich zinc finger-like motifs and a pleckstrin homology (PH) domain (1–4). Physiological activation of PKD within cells occurs via a phosphorylation-dependent mechanism first identified in our laboratory (5–7). In response to cellular stimuli (1), including phorbol esters, growth factors (e.g. PDGF), and G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) agonists (6, 8–16) that signal through G_q, G₁₂, G_i, and Rho (11, 15–19), PKD is converted into a form with high catalytic activity, as shown by in vitro kinase assays performed in the absence of lipid co-activators (5, 20).During these studies multiple lines of evidence indicated that PKC activity is necessary for rapid PKD activation within intact cells. For example, rapid PKD activation was selectively and potently blocked by cell treatment with preferential PKC inhibitors (e.g. GF109203X or Gö6983) that do not directly inhibit PKD catalytic activity (5, 20), implying that PKD activation in intact cells is mediated directly or indirectly through PKCs. Many reports demonstrated the operation of a rapid PKC/PKD signaling cascade induced by multiple GPCR agonists and other receptor ligands in a range of cell types (for review, see Ref. 1). Our previous studies identified Ser⁷⁴⁴ and Ser⁷⁴⁸ in the PKD activation loop (also referred as activation segment or T-loop) as phosphorylation sites critical for PKC-mediated PKD activation (1, 4, 7, 17, 21). Collectively, these findings demonstrated the existence of a rapidly activated PKC-PKD protein kinase cascade(s). In a recent study we found that the rapid PKC-dependent PKD activation was followed by a late, PKC-independent phase of catalytic activation and phosphorylation induced by stimulation of the bombesin G_q-coupled receptor ectopically expressed in COS-7 cells (22). This study raised the possibility that PKD mediates rapid biological responses downstream of PKCs, whereas, in striking contrast, PKD could mediate long term responses through PKC-independent pathways. Despite its potential importance for defining the role of PKC and PKD in signal transduction, this hypothesis has not been tested in any cell type.Accumulating evidence demonstrates that PKD plays an important role in several cellular processes and activities, including signal transduction (14, 23–25), chromatin organization (26), Golgi function (27, 28), gene expression (29–31), immune regulation (26), and cell survival, adhesion, motility, differentiation, DNA synthesis, and proliferation (for review, see Ref. 1). In Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts, a cell line used extensively as a model system to elucidate mechanisms of mitogenic signaling (32–34), PKD expression potently enhances ERK activation, DNA synthesis, and cell proliferation induced by G_q-coupled receptor agonists (8, 14). Here, we used this model system to elucidate the role and mechanism(s) of biphasic PKD activation. First, we show that the G_q-coupled receptor agonists bombesin and vasopressin, in contrast to phorbol esters, specifically induce PKD activation through early PKC-dependent and late PKC-independent mechanisms in Swiss 3T3 cells. Subsequently, we demonstrate for the first time that the PKC-independent phase of PKD activation is responsible for promoting ERK signaling and progression to DNA synthesis through an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-dependent pathway. Thus, our results identify a novel mechanism of G_q-coupled receptor-induced mitogenesis mediated by sustained PKD activation through a PKC-independent pathway.     

Mechanism of Sustained Activation of Ribosomal S6 Kinase (RSK) and ERK by Kaposi Sarcoma-associated Herpesvirus ORF45: MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEXES RETAIN ACTIVE PHOSPHORYLATED ERK AND RSK AND PROTECT THEM FROM DEPHOSPHORYLATION*

As obligate intracellular parasites, viruses exploit diverse cellular signaling machineries, including the mitogen-activated protein-kinase pathway, during their infections. We have demonstrated previously that the open reading frame 45 (ORF45) of Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus interacts with p90 ribosomal S6 kinases (RSKs) and strongly stimulates their kinase activities (Kuang, E., Tang, Q., Maul, G. G., and Zhu, F. (2008) J. Virol. 82 ,1838 -1850). Here, we define the mechanism by which ORF45 activates RSKs. We demonstrated that binding of ORF45 to RSK increases the association of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) with RSK, such that ORF45, RSK, and ERK formed high molecular mass protein complexes. We further demonstrated that the complexes shielded active pERK and pRSK from dephosphorylation. As a result, the complex-associated RSK and ERK were activated and sustained at high levels. Finally, we provide evidence that this mechanism contributes to the sustained activation of ERK and RSK in Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus lytic replication.The extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)² mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway has been implicated in diverse cellular physiological processes including proliferation, survival, growth, differentiation, and motility (1-4) and is also exploited by a variety of viruses such as Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV), human cytomegalovirus, human immunodeficiency virus, respiratory syncytial virus, hepatitis B virus, coxsackie, vaccinia, coronavirus, and influenza virus (5-17). The MAPK kinases relay the extracellular signaling through sequential phosphorylation to an array of cytoplasmic and nuclear substrates to elicit specific responses (1, 2, 18). Phosphorylation of MAPK is reversible. The kinetics of deactivation or duration of signaling dictates diverse biological outcomes (19, 20). For example, sustained but not transient activation of ERK signaling induces the differentiation of PC12 cells into sympathetic-like neurons and transformation of NIH3T3 cells (20-22). During viral infection, a unique biphasic ERK activation has been observed for some viruses (an early transient activation triggered by viral binding or entry and a late sustained activation correlated with viral gene expression), but the responsible viral factors and underlying mechanism for the sustained ERK activation remain largely unknown (5, 8, 13, 23).The p90 ribosomal S6 kinases (RSKs) are a family of serine/threonine kinases that lie at the terminus of the ERK pathway (1, 24-26). In mammals, four isoforms are known, RSK1 to RSK4. Each one has two catalytically functional kinase domains, the N-terminal kinase domain (NTKD) and C-terminal kinase domain (CTKD) as well as a linker region between the two. The NTKD is responsible for phosphorylation of exogenous substrates, and the CTKD and linker region regulate RSK activation (1, 24, 25). In quiescent cells ERK binds to the docking site in the C terminus of RSK (27-29). Upon mitogen stimulation, ERK is activated by its upstream MAPK/ERK kinase (MEK). The active ERK phosphorylates Thr-359/Ser-363 of RSK in the linker region (amino acid numbers refer to human RSK1) and Thr-573 in the CTKD activation loop. The activated CTKD then phosphorylates Ser-380 in the linker region, creating a docking site for 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1. The 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1 phosphorylates Ser-221 of RSK in the activation loop and activates the NTKD. The activated NTKD autophosphorylates the serine residue near the ERK docking site, causing a transient dissociation of active ERK from RSK (25, 26, 28). The stimulation of quiescent cells by a mitogen such as epidermal growth factor or a phorbol ester such as 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) usually results in a transient RSK activation that lasts less than 30 min. RSKs have been implicated in regulating cell survival, growth, and proliferation. Mutation or aberrant expression of RSK has been implicated in several human diseases including Coffin-Lowry syndrome and prostate and breast cancers (1, 24, 25, 30-32).KSHV is a human DNA tumor virus etiologically linked to Kaposi sarcoma, primary effusion lymphoma, and a subset of multicentric Castleman disease (33, 34). Infection and reactivation of KSHV activate multiple MAPK pathways (6, 12, 35). Noticeably, the ERK/RSK activation is sustained late during KSHV primary infection and reactivation from latency (5, 6, 12, 23), but the mechanism of the sustained ERK/RSK activation is unclear. Recently, we demonstrated that ORF45, an immediate early and also virion tegument protein of KSHV, interacts with RSK1 and RSK2 and strongly stimulates their kinase activities (23). We also demonstrated that the activation of RSK plays an essential role in KSHV lytic replication (23). In the present study we determined the mechanism of ORF45-induced sustained ERK/RSK activation. We found that ORF45 increases the association of RSK with ERK and protects them from dephosphorylation, causing sustained activation of both ERK and RSK.     

RecR-mediated Modulation of RecF Dimer Specificity for Single- and Double-stranded DNA

RecF pathway proteins play an important role in the restart of stalled replication and DNA repair in prokaryotes. Following DNA damage, RecF, RecR, and RecO initiate homologous recombination (HR) by loading of the RecA recombinase on single-stranded (ss) DNA, protected by ssDNA-binding protein. The specific role of RecF in this process is not well understood. Previous studies have proposed that RecF directs the RecOR complex to boundaries of damaged DNA regions by recognizing single-stranded/double-stranded (ss/ds) DNA junctions. RecF belongs to ABC-type ATPases, which function through an ATP-dependent dimerization. Here, we demonstrate that the RecF of Deinococcus radiodurans interacts with DNA as an ATP-dependent dimer, and that the DNA binding and ATPase activity of RecF depend on both the structure of DNA substrate, and the presence of RecR. We found that RecR interacts as a tetramer with the RecF dimer. RecR increases the RecF affinity to dsDNA without stimulating ATP hydrolysis but destabilizes RecF binding to ssDNA and dimerization, likely due to increasing the ATPase rate. The DNA-dependent binding of RecR to the RecF-DNA complex occurs through specific protein-protein interactions without significant contributions from RecR-DNA interactions. Finally, RecF neither alone nor in complex with RecR preferentially binds to the ss/dsDNA junction. Our data suggest that the specificity of the RecFOR complex toward the boundaries of DNA damaged regions may result from a network of protein-protein and DNA-protein interactions, rather than a simple recognition of the ss/dsDNA junction by RecF.Homologous recombination (HR)² is one of the primary mechanisms by which cells repair dsDNA breaks (DSBs) and ssDNA gaps (SSGs), and is important for restart of stalled DNA replication (1). HR is initiated when RecA-like recombinases bind to ssDNA forming an extended nucleoprotein filament, referred to as a presynaptic complex (2). The potential for genetic rearrangements dictates that HR initiation is tightly regulated at multiple levels (1). During replication, the ssDNA-binding protein (SSB) protects transiently unwound DNA chains, preventing interactions with recombinases. Following DNA damage, recombination mediator proteins (RMPs) initiate HR by facilitating the formation of the recombinase filaments with ssDNA, while removing SSB (3, 4). Mutations in human proteins involved in HR initiation are linked to cancer predisposition, chromosome instability, UV sensitivity, and premature aging diseases (4–8). To date, little is known about the mechanism by which RMPs regulate the formation of the recombinase filaments on the SSB-protected ssDNA.In Escherichia coli, there are two major recombination pathways, RecBCD and RecF (9, 10). A helicase/nuclease RecBCD complex processes DSBs and recruits RecA on ssDNA in a sequence-specific manner (11–13). The principle players in the RecF pathway are the RecF, RecO, and RecR proteins, which form an epistatic group that is important for SSG repair, for restart of stalled DNA replication, and under specific conditions, can also process DSBs (14–20). Homologs of RecF, -O, and -R are present in the majority of known bacteria (21), including Deinococcus radiodurans, extremely radiation-resistant bacteria that lacks the RecBCD pathway, yet is capable of repairing thousands of DSBs (22, 23). In addition, the sequence or functional homologs of RecF pathway proteins are involved in similar pathways in eukaryotes that include among others WRN, BLM, RAD52, and BRCA2 proteins (4–8).The involvement of all three RecF, -O, and -R proteins in HR initiation is well documented by genetic and cellular approaches (18, 24–30), yet their biochemical functions in the initiation process remain unclear, particularly with respect to RecF. RecO and RecR proteins are sufficient to promote formation of the RecA filament on SSB-bound ssDNA in vitro (27). The UV-sensitive phenotype of recF mutants can be suppressed by RecOR overexpression, suggesting that RecF may direct the RMP complex to DNA-damaged regions where HR initiation is required (31). In agreement with this hypothesis, RecF dramatically increases the efficiency of the RecA loading at ds/ssDNA junctions with a 3′ ssDNA extension under specific conditions (32). RecF and RecR proteins also prevent the RecA filaments from extending into dsDNA regions adjacent to SSGs (33). These data suggest that RecF may directly recognize an ss/dsDNA junction structure (34). However, DNA binding experiments have not provided clear evidence to support such a hypothesis (11).The targeting promoted by RecF may also occur through more complex processes. RecF shares a high structural similarity with the head domain of Rad50, an ABC-type ATPase that recognizes DSBs and initiates repair in archaea and eukaryotes (35). All known ABC-type ATPases function as oligomeric complexes in which a sequence of inter- and intra-molecular interactions is triggered by the ATP-dependent dimerization and the dimer-dependent ATP hydrolysis (36–39). RecF is also an ATP-dependent DNA-binding protein and a weak DNA-dependent ATPase (11, 40). RecF forms an ATP-dependent dimer and all three conserved motifs (Walker A, Walker B, and “signature”) of RecF are important for ATP-dependent dimerization, ATP hydrolysis, and functional resistance to DNA damage (35). Thus, RecF may function in recombination initiation through a complex pathway of protein-protein and DNA-protein interactions regulated by ATP-dependent RecF dimerization.In this report, we present a detailed characterization of the RecF dimerization, and its role in the RecF interaction with various DNA substrates, with RecR, and in ATP hydrolysis. Our data outline the following key findings. First, RecF interacts with DNA as a dimer. Second, neither RecF alone nor the RecFR complex preferentially binds the ss/dsDNA junction. Finally, RecR changes the ATPase activity and the DNA binding of RecF by destabilizing the interaction with ssDNA, and greatly enhancing the interaction with dsDNA. Our results suggest that the specificity of RecF for the boundaries of SSGs is likely to result from a sequence of protein-protein interaction events rather than a simple RecF ss/dsDNA binding, underlining a highly regulated mechanism of the HR initiation by the RecFOR proteins.     

Bortezomib Overcomes Tumor Necrosis Factor-related Apoptosis-inducing Ligand Resistance in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells in Part through the Inhibition of the Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/Akt Pathway

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common and aggressive human malignancies. Recombinant tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) is a promising anti-tumor agent. However, many HCC cells show resistance to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. In this study, we showed that bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, overcame TRAIL resistance in HCC cells, including Huh-7, Hep3B, and Sk-Hep1. The combination of bortezomib and TRAIL restored the sensitivity of HCC cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Comparing the molecular change in HCC cells treated with these agents, we found that down-regulation of phospho-Akt (P-Akt) played a key role in mediating TRAIL sensitization of bortezomib. The first evidence was that bortezomib down-regulated P-Akt in a dose- and time-dependent manner in TRAIL-treated HCC cells. Second, {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"LY294002","term_id":"1257998346","term_text":"LY294002"}}LY294002, a PI3K inhibitor, also sensitized resistant HCC cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Third, knocking down Akt1 by small interference RNA also enhanced TRAIL-induced apoptosis in Huh-7 cells. Finally, ectopic expression of mutant Akt (constitutive active) in HCC cells abolished TRAIL sensitization effect of bortezomib. Moreover, okadaic acid, a protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) inhibitor, reversed down-regulation of P-Akt in bortezomib-treated cells, and PP2A knockdown by small interference RNA also reduced apoptosis induced by the combination of TRAIL and bortezomib, indicating that PP2A may be important in mediating the effect of bortezomib on TRAIL sensitization. Together, bortezomib overcame TRAIL resistance at clinically achievable concentrations in hepatocellular carcinoma cells, and this effect is mediated at least partly via inhibition of the PI3K/Akt pathway.Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)² is currently the fifth most common solid tumor worldwide and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death. To date, surgery is still the only curative treatment but is only feasible in a small portion of patients (1). Drug treatment is the major therapy for patients with advanced stage disease. Unfortunately, the response rate to traditional chemotherapy for HCC patients is unsatisfactory (1). Novel pharmacological therapy is urgently needed for patients with advanced HCC. In this regard, the approval of sorafenib might open a new era of molecularly targeted therapy in the treatment of HCC patients.Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), a type II transmembrane protein and a member of the TNF family, is a promising anti-tumor agent under clinical investigation (2). TRAIL functions by engaging its receptors expressed on the surface of target cells. Five receptors specific for TRAIL have been identified, including DR4/TRAIL-R1, DR5/TRAIL-R2, DcR1, DcR2, and osteoprotegerin. Among TRAIL receptors, only DR4 and DR5 contain an effective death domain that is essential to formation of death-inducing signaling complex (DISC), a critical step for TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Notably, the trimerization of the death domains recruits an adaptor molecule, Fas-associated protein with death domain (FADD), which subsequently recruits and activates caspase-8. In type I cells, activation of caspase-8 is sufficient to activate caspase-3 to induce apoptosis; however, in another type of cells (type II), the intrinsic mitochondrial pathway is essential for apoptosis characterized by cleavage of Bid and release of cytochrome c from mitochondria, which subsequently activates caspase-9 and caspase-3 (3).Although TRAIL induces apoptosis in malignant cells but sparing normal cells, some tumor cells are resistant to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Mechanisms responsible for the resistance include receptors and intracellular resistance. Although the cell surface expression of DR4 or DR5 is absolutely required for TRAIL-induced apoptosis, tumor cells expressing these death receptors are not always sensitive to TRAIL due to intracellular mechanisms. For example, the cellular FLICE-inhibitory protein (c-FLIP), a homologue to caspase-8 but without protease activity, has been linked to TRAIL resistance in several studies (4, 5). In addition, inactivation of Bax, a proapoptotic Bcl-2 family protein, resulted in resistance to TRAIL in MMR-deficient tumors (6, 7), and reintroduction of Bax into Bax-deficient cells restored TRAIL sensitivity (8), indicating that the Bcl-2 family plays a critical role in intracellular mechanisms for resistance of TRAIL.Bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor approved clinically for multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma, has been investigated intensively for many types of cancer (9). Accumulating studies indicate that the combination of bortezomib and TRAIL overcomes the resistance to TRAIL in various types of cancer, including acute myeloid leukemia (4), lymphoma (10–13), prostate (14–17), colon (15, 18, 19), bladder (14, 16), renal cell carcinoma (20), thyroid (21), ovary (22), non-small cell lung (23, 24), sarcoma (25), and HCC (26, 27). Molecular targets responsible for the sensitizing effect of bortezomib on TRAIL-induced cell death include DR4 (14, 27), DR5 (14, 20, 22–23, 28), c-FLIP (4, 11, 21–23, 29), NF-κB (12, 24, 30), p21 (16, 21, 25), and p27 (25). In addition, Bcl-2 family also plays a role in the combinational effect of bortezomib and TRAIL, including Bcl-2 (10, 21), Bax (13, 22), Bak (27), Bcl-xL (21), Bik (18), and Bim (15).Recently, we have reported that Akt signaling is a major molecular determinant in bortezomib-induced apoptosis in HCC cells (31). In this study, we demonstrated that bortezomib overcame TRAIL resistance in HCC cells through inhibition of the PI3K/Akt pathway.     

Loss of PINK1 Function Promotes Mitophagy through Effects on Oxidative Stress and Mitochondrial Fission

Mitochondrial dysregulation is strongly implicated in Parkinson disease. Mutations in PTEN-induced kinase 1 (PINK1) are associated with familial parkinsonism and neuropsychiatric disorders. Although overexpressed PINK1 is neuroprotective, less is known about neuronal responses to loss of PINK1 function. We found that stable knockdown of PINK1 induced mitochondrial fragmentation and autophagy in SH-SY5Y cells, which was reversed by the reintroduction of an RNA interference (RNAi)-resistant plasmid for PINK1. Moreover, stable or transient overexpression of wild-type PINK1 increased mitochondrial interconnectivity and suppressed toxin-induced autophagy/mitophagy. Mitochondrial oxidant production played an essential role in triggering mitochondrial fragmentation and autophagy in PINK1 shRNA lines. Autophagy/mitophagy served a protective role in limiting cell death, and overexpressing Parkin further enhanced this protective mitophagic response. The dominant negative Drp1 mutant inhibited both fission and mitophagy in PINK1-deficient cells. Interestingly, RNAi knockdown of autophagy proteins Atg7 and LC3/Atg8 also decreased mitochondrial fragmentation without affecting oxidative stress, suggesting active involvement of autophagy in morphologic remodeling of mitochondria for clearance. To summarize, loss of PINK1 function elicits oxidative stress and mitochondrial turnover coordinated by the autophagic and fission/fusion machineries. Furthermore, PINK1 and Parkin may cooperate through different mechanisms to maintain mitochondrial homeostasis.Parkinson disease is an age-related neurodegenerative disease that affects ∼1% of the population worldwide. The causes of sporadic cases are unknown, although mitochondrial or oxidative toxins such as 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium, 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA),³ and rotenone reproduce features of the disease in animal and cell culture models (1). Abnormalities in mitochondrial respiration and increased oxidative stress are observed in cells and tissues from parkinsonian patients (2, 3), which also exhibit increased mitochondrial autophagy (4). Furthermore, mutations in parkinsonian genes affect oxidative stress response pathways and mitochondrial homeostasis (5). Thus, disruption of mitochondrial homeostasis represents a major factor implicated in the pathogenesis of sporadic and inherited parkinsonian disorders (PD).The PARK6 locus involved in autosomal recessive and early-onset PD encodes for PTEN-induced kinase 1 (PINK1) (6, 7). PINK1 is a cytosolic and mitochondrially localized 581-amino acid serine/threonine kinase that possesses an N-terminal mitochondrial targeting sequence (6, 8). The primary sequence also includes a putative transmembrane domain important for orientation of the PINK1 domain (8), a conserved kinase domain homologous to calcium calmodulin kinases, and a C-terminal domain that regulates autophosphorylation activity (9, 10). Overexpression of wild-type PINK1, but not its PD-associated mutants, protects against several toxic insults in neuronal cells (6, 11, 12). Mitochondrial targeting is necessary for some (13) but not all of the neuroprotective effects of PINK1 (14), implicating involvement of cytoplasmic targets that modulate mitochondrial pathobiology (8). PINK1 catalytic activity is necessary for its neuroprotective role, because a kinase-deficient K219M substitution in the ATP binding pocket of PINK1 abrogates its ability to protect neurons (14). Although PINK1 mutations do not seem to impair mitochondrial targeting, PD-associated mutations differentially destabilize the protein, resulting in loss of neuroprotective activities (13, 15).Recent studies indicate that PINK1 and Parkin interact genetically (3, 16-18) to prevent oxidative stress (19, 20) and regulate mitochondrial morphology (21). Primary cells derived from PINK1 mutant patients exhibit mitochondrial fragmentation with disorganized cristae, recapitulated by RNA interference studies in HeLa cells (3).Mitochondria are degraded by macroautophagy, a process involving sequestration of cytoplasmic cargo into membranous autophagic vacuoles (AVs) for delivery to lysosomes (22, 23). Interestingly, mitochondrial fission accompanies autophagic neurodegeneration elicited by the PD neurotoxin 6-OHDA (24, 25). Moreover, mitochondrial fragmentation and increased autophagy are observed in neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer and Parkinson diseases (4, 26-28). Although inclusion of mitochondria in autophagosomes was once believed to be a random process, as observed during starvation, studies involving hypoxia, mitochondrial damage, apoptotic stimuli, or limiting amounts of aerobic substrates in facultative anaerobes support the concept of selective mitochondrial autophagy (mitophagy) (29, 30). In particular, mitochondrially localized kinases may play an important role in models involving oxidative mitochondrial injury (25, 31, 32).Autophagy is involved in the clearance of protein aggregates (33-35) and normal regulation of axonal-synaptic morphology (36). Chronic disruption of lysosomal function results in accumulation of subtly impaired mitochondria with decreased calcium buffering capacity (37), implicating an important role for autophagy in mitochondrial homeostasis (37, 38). Recently, Parkin, which complements the effects of PINK1 deficiency on mitochondrial morphology (3), was found to promote autophagy of depolarized mitochondria (39). Conversely, Beclin 1-independent autophagy/mitophagy contributes to cell death elicited by the PD toxins 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium and 6-OHDA (25, 28, 31, 32), causing neurite retraction in cells expressing a PD-linked mutation in leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (40). Whereas properly regulated autophagy plays a homeostatic and neuroprotective role, excessive or incomplete autophagy creates a condition of “autophagic stress” that can contribute to neurodegeneration (28).As mitochondrial fragmentation (3) and increased mitochondrial autophagy (4) have been described in human cells or tissues of PD patients, we investigated whether or not the engineered loss of PINK1 function could recapitulate these observations in human neuronal cells (SH-SY5Y). Stable knockdown of endogenous PINK1 gave rise to mitochondrial fragmentation and increased autophagy and mitophagy, whereas stable or transient overexpression of PINK1 had the opposite effect. Autophagy/mitophagy was dependent upon increased mitochondrial oxidant production and activation of fission. The data indicate that PINK1 is important for the maintenance of mitochondrial networks, suggesting that coordinated regulation of mitochondrial dynamics and autophagy limits cell death associated with loss of PINK1 function.     

Tiam1 and Rac1 Are Required for Platelet-activating Factor-induced Endothelial Junctional Disassembly and Increase in Vascular Permeability

It is known that platelet-activating factor (PAF) induces severe endothelial barrier leakiness, but the signaling mechanisms remain unclear. Here, using a wide range of biochemical and morphological approaches applied in both mouse models and cultured endothelial cells, we addressed the mechanisms of PAF-induced disruption of interendothelial junctions (IEJs) and of increased endothelial permeability. The formation of interendothelial gaps filled with filopodia and lamellipodia is the cellular event responsible for the disruption of endothelial barrier. We observed that PAF ligation of its receptor induced the activation of the Rho GTPase Rac1. Following PAF exposure, both Rac1 and its guanine nucleotide exchange factor Tiam1 were found associated with a membrane fraction from which they co-immunoprecipitated with PAF receptor. In the same time frame with Tiam1-Rac1 translocation, the junctional proteins ZO-1 and VE-cadherin were relocated from the IEJs, and formation of numerous interendothelial gaps was recorded. Notably, the response was independent of myosin light chain phosphorylation and thus distinct from other mediators, such as histamine and thrombin. The changes in actin status are driven by the PAF-induced localized actin polymerization as a consequence of Rac1 translocation and activation. Tiam1 was required for the activation of Rac1, actin polymerization, relocation of junctional associated proteins, and disruption of IEJs. Thus, PAF-induced IEJ disruption and increased endothelial permeability requires the activation of a Tiam1-Rac1 signaling module, suggesting a novel therapeutic target against increased vascular permeability associated with inflammatory diseases.The endothelial barrier is made up of endothelial cells (ECs)⁴ connected to each other by interendothelial junctions (IEJs) consisting of protein complexes organized as tight junctions (TJs) and adherens junctions (AJs). In addition, the focal adhesion complex located at the basal plasma membrane enables firm contact of ECs with the underlying basement membrane and also contributes to the barrier function (1-3). The glycocalyx, the endothelial monolayer, and the basement membrane all together constitute the vascular barrier.The structural integrity of the ECs along with their proper functionality are the two most important factors controlling the tightness of the endothelial barrier. Changes affecting these factors cause loss of barrier restrictiveness and leakiness. Therefore, defining and understanding the cellular and molecular mechanisms controlling these processes is of paramount importance. Increased width of IEJs in response to permeability-increasing mediators (4) regulates the magnitude of transendothelial exchange of fluid and solutes. Disruption of IEJs and the resultant barrier leakiness contribute to the genesis of diverse pathological conditions, such as inflammation (5), metastasis (6, 7), and uncontrolled angiogenesis (8, 9).Accumulated evidence demonstrated that IEJs changes are responsible for increased or decreased vascular permeability, and the generally accepted mechanism responsible for them was the myosin light chain (MLC)-mediated contraction of ECs (5, 10). However, published evidence showed that an increase in vascular permeability could be obtained without a direct involvement of any contractile mechanism (11-16).The main component of the vascular barrier, the ECs, has more than 10% of their total protein represented by actin (17), which under physiological salt concentrations subsists as monomers (G-actin) and assembled into filaments (F-actin). A large number of actin-interacting proteins may modulate the assembly, disassembly, and organization of G-actin and of actin filaments within a given cell type. Similar to the complexity of actin-interacting proteins found in other cell types, the ECs utilize their actin binding proteins to stabilize the endothelial monolayer in order to efficiently function as a selective barrier (11). In undisturbed ECs, the actin microfilaments are organized as different networks with distinctive functional and morphological characteristics: the peripheral filaments also known as peripheral dense band (PDB), the cytoplasmic fibers identified as stress fibers (SF), and the actin from the membrane cytoskeleton (18). The peripheral web, localized immediately under the membrane, is associated with (i) the luminal plasmalemma (on the apical side), (ii) the IEJ complexes on the lateral surfaces, and (iii) the focal adhesion complexes on the abluminal side (the basal part) of polarized ECs. The SF reside inside the endothelial cytoplasm and are believed to be directly connected with the plasmalemma proper on the luminal as well as on the abluminal side of the cell. As described, the endothelial actin cytoskeleton (specifically the SF) seems to be a stable structure helping the cells to remain flat under flow (19). It is also established that the actin fibers participate in correct localization of different junctional complexes while keeping them in place (20). However, it was suggested that the dynamic equilibrium between F- and G-actin might modulate the tightness of endothelial barrier in response to different challenges (13).Mediators effective at nanomolar concentrations or less that disrupt the endothelial barrier and increase vascular permeability include C2 toxin of Clostridium botulinum, vascular permeability factor, better known as vascular endothelial growth factor, and PAF (21). C2 toxin increases endothelial permeability by ribosylating monomeric G-actin at Arg-177 (22). This results in the impairment of actin polymerization (23), followed by rounding of ECs (16) and the disruption of junctional integrity. Vascular permeability factor was shown to open IEJs by redistribution of junctional proteins (24, 25) and by interfering with the equilibrium of actin pools (26). PAF (1-O-alkyl-2-acetyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocoline), a naturally synthesized phospholipid is active at 10^-10 m or less (27). PAF is synthesized by and acts on a variety of cell types, including platelets (28), neutrophils (29), monocytes (30), and ECs (31). PAF-mediated activation of ECs induced cell migration (32), angiogenesis (7), and vascular hyperpermeability (33) secondary to disassembly of IEJs (34). The effects of PAF on the endothelium are initiated through a G protein-coupled receptor (PAF-R) localized at the plasmalemma, in a large endosomal compartment inside the cell (34), and also in the nuclear membrane (35). In ECs, PAF-R was shown to signal through Gα_q and downstream activation of phospholipase C isozymes (PLCβ₃ and PLCγ₁), and via cSrc (32, 36). Studies have shown that PAF challenge induced endothelial actin cytoskeletal rearrangement (37) and marked vascular leakiness (38); however, the signaling pathways have not been elucidated.Therefore, in the present study, we carried out a systematic analysis of PAF-induced morphological and biochemical changes of endothelial barrier in vivo and in cultured ECs. We found that the opening of endothelial barrier and the increased vascular leakiness induced by PAF are the result of a shift in actin pools without involvement of EC contraction, followed by a redistribution of tight junctional associated protein ZO-1 and adherens junctional protein VE-cadherin.     

Recombination Activator Function of the Novel RAD51- and RAD51B-binding Protein, Human EVL

The RAD51 protein is a central player in homologous recombinational repair. The RAD51B protein is one of five RAD51 paralogs that function in the homologous recombinational repair pathway in higher eukaryotes. In the present study, we found that the human EVL (Ena/Vasp-like) protein, which is suggested to be involved in actin-remodeling processes, unexpectedly binds to the RAD51 and RAD51B proteins and stimulates the RAD51-mediated homologous pairing and strand exchange. The EVL knockdown cells impaired RAD51 assembly onto damaged DNA after ionizing radiation or mitomycin C treatment. The EVL protein alone promotes single-stranded DNA annealing, and the recombination activities of the EVL protein are further enhanced by the RAD51B protein. The expression of the EVL protein is not ubiquitous, but it is significantly expressed in breast cancer-derived MCF7 cells. These results suggest that the EVL protein is a novel recombination factor that may be required for repairing specific DNA lesions, and that may cause tumor malignancy by its inappropriate expression.Chromosomal DNA double strand breaks (DSBs)² are potential inducers of chromosomal aberrations and tumorigenesis, and they are accurately repaired by the homologous recombinational repair (HRR) pathway, without base substitutions, deletions, and insertions (1–3). In the HRR pathway (4, 5), single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) tails are produced at the DSB sites. The RAD51 protein, a eukaryotic homologue of the bacterial RecA protein, binds to the ssDNA tail and forms a helical nucleoprotein filament. The RAD51-ssDNA filament then binds to the intact double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) to form a three-component complex, containing ssDNA, dsDNA, and the RAD51 protein. In this three-component complex, the RAD51 protein promotes recombination reactions, such as homologous pairing and strand exchange (6–9).The RAD51 protein requires auxiliary proteins to promote the homologous pairing and strand exchange reactions efficiently in cells (10–12). In humans, the RAD52, RAD54, and RAD54B proteins directly interact with the RAD51 protein (13–17) and stimulate the RAD51-mediated homologous pairing and/or strand exchange reactions in vitro (18–21). The human RAD51AP1 protein, which directly binds to the RAD51 protein (22), was also found to stimulate RAD51-mediated homologous pairing in vitro (23, 24). The BRCA2 protein contains ssDNA-binding, dsDNA-binding, and RAD51-binding motifs (25–33), and the Ustilago maydis BRCA2 ortholog, Brh2, reportedly stimulated RAD51-mediated strand exchange (34, 35). Most of these RAD51-interacting factors are known to be required for efficient RAD51 assembly onto DSB sites in cells treated with ionizing radiation (10–12).The RAD51B (RAD51L1, Rec2) protein is a member of the RAD51 paralogs, which share about 20–30% amino acid sequence similarity with the RAD51 protein (36–38). RAD51B-deficient cells are hypersensitive to DSB-inducing agents, such as cisplatin, mitomycin C (MMC), and γ-rays, indicating that the RAD51B protein is involved in the HRR pathway (39–44). Genetic experiments revealed that RAD51B-deficient cells exhibited impaired RAD51 assembly onto DSB sites (39, 44), suggesting that the RAD51B protein functions in the early stage of the HRR pathway. Biochemical experiments also suggested that the RAD51B protein participates in the early to late stages of the HRR pathway (45–47).In the present study, we found that the human EVL (Ena/Vasp-like) protein binds to the RAD51 and RAD51B proteins in a HeLa cell extract. The EVL protein is known to be involved in cytoplasmic actin remodeling (48) and is also overexpressed in breast cancer (49). Like the RAD51B knockdown cells, the EVL knockdown cells partially impaired RAD51 foci formation after DSB induction, suggesting that the EVL protein enhances RAD51 assembly onto DSB sites. The purified EVL protein preferentially bound to ssDNA and stimulated RAD51-mediated homologous pairing and strand exchange. The EVL protein also promoted the annealing of complementary strands. These recombination reactions that were stimulated or promoted by the EVL protein were further enhanced by the RAD51B protein. These results strongly suggested that the EVL protein is a novel factor that activates RAD51-mediated recombination reactions, probably with the RAD51B protein. We anticipate that, in addition to its involvement in cytoplasmic actin dynamics, the EVL protein may be required in homologous recombination for repairing specific DNA lesions, and it may cause tumor malignancy by inappropriate recombination enhanced by EVL overexpression in certain types of tumor cells.     

Intersectin Regulates Dendritic Spine Development and Somatodendritic Endocytosis but Not Synaptic Vesicle Recycling in Hippocampal Neurons

Intersectin-short (intersectin-s) is a multimodule scaffolding protein functioning in constitutive and regulated forms of endocytosis in non-neuronal cells and in synaptic vesicle (SV) recycling at the neuromuscular junction of Drosophila and Caenorhabditis elegans. In vertebrates, alternative splicing generates a second isoform, intersectin-long (intersectin-l), that contains additional modular domains providing a guanine nucleotide exchange factor activity for Cdc42. In mammals, intersectin-s is expressed in multiple tissues and cells, including glia, but excluded from neurons, whereas intersectin-l is a neuron-specific isoform. Thus, intersectin-I may regulate multiple forms of endocytosis in mammalian neurons, including SV endocytosis. We now report, however, that intersectin-l is localized to somatodendritic regions of cultured hippocampal neurons, with some juxtanuclear accumulation, but is excluded from synaptophysin-labeled axon terminals. Consistently, intersectin-l knockdown (KD) does not affect SV recycling. Instead intersectin-l co-localizes with clathrin heavy chain and adaptor protein 2 in the somatodendritic region of neurons, and its KD reduces the rate of transferrin endocytosis. The protein also co-localizes with F-actin at dendritic spines, and intersectin-l KD disrupts spine maturation during development. Our data indicate that intersectin-l is indeed an important regulator of constitutive endocytosis and neuronal development but that it is not a prominent player in the regulated endocytosis of SVs.Clathrin-mediated endocytosis (CME)⁴ is a major mechanism by which cells take up nutrients, control the surface levels of multiple proteins, including ion channels and transporters, and regulate the coupling of signaling receptors to downstream signaling cascades (1-5). In neurons, CME takes on additional specialized roles; it is an important process regulating synaptic vesicle (SV) availability through endocytosis and recycling of SV membranes (6, 7), it shapes synaptic plasticity (8-10), and it is crucial in maintaining synaptic membranes and membrane structure (11).Numerous endocytic accessory proteins participate in CME, interacting with each other and with core components of the endocytic machinery such as clathrin heavy chain (CHC) and adaptor protein-2 (AP-2) through specific modules and peptide motifs (12). One such module is the Eps15 homology domain that binds to proteins bearing NPF motifs (13, 14). Another is the Src homology 3 (SH3) domain, which binds to proline-rich domains in protein partners (15). Intersectin is a multimodule scaffolding protein that interacts with a wide range of proteins, including several involved in CME (16). Intersectin has two N-terminal Eps15 homology domains that are responsible for binding to epsin, SCAMP1, and numb (17-19), a central coil-coiled domain that interacts with Eps15 and SNAP-23 and -25 (17, 20, 21), and five SH3 domains in its C-terminal region that interact with multiple proline-rich domain proteins, including synaptojanin, dynamin, N-WASP, CdGAP, and mSOS (16, 22-25). The rich binding capability of intersectin has linked it to various functions from CME (17, 26, 27) and signaling (22, 28, 29) to mitogenesis (30, 31) and regulation of the actin cytoskeleton (23).Intersectin functions in SV recycling at the neuromuscular junction of Drosophila and C. elegans where it acts as a scaffold, regulating the synaptic levels of endocytic accessory proteins (21, 32-34). In vertebrates, the intersectin gene is subject to alternative splicing, and a longer isoform (intersectin-l) is generated that is expressed exclusively in neurons (26, 28, 35, 36). This isoform has all the binding modules of its short (intersectin-s) counterpart but also has additional domains: a DH and a PH domain that provide guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) activity specific for Cdc42 (23, 37) and a C2 domain at the C terminus. Through its GEF activity and binding to actin regulatory proteins, including N-WASP, intersectin-l has been implicated in actin regulation and the development of dendritic spines (19, 23, 24). In addition, because the rest of the binding modules are shared between intersectin-s and -l, it is generally thought that the two intersectin isoforms have the same endocytic functions. In particular, given the well defined role for the invertebrate orthologs of intersectin-s in SV endocytosis, it is thought that intersectin-l performs this role in mammalian neurons, which lack intersectin-s. Defining the complement of intersectin functional activities in mammalian neurons is particularly relevant given that the protein is involved in the pathophysiology of Down syndrome (DS). Specifically, the intersectin gene is localized on chromosome 21q22.2 and is overexpressed in DS brains (38). Interestingly, alterations in endosomal pathways are a hallmark of DS neurons and neurons from the partial trisomy 16 mouse, Ts65Dn, a model for DS (39, 40). Thus, an endocytic trafficking defect may contribute to the DS disease process.Here, the functional roles of intersectin-l were studied in cultured hippocampal neurons. We find that intersectin-l is localized to the somatodendritic regions of neurons, where it co-localizes with CHC and AP-2 and regulates the uptake of transferrin. Intersectin-l also co-localizes with actin at dendritic spines and disrupting intersectin-l function alters dendritic spine development. In contrast, intersectin-l is absent from presynaptic terminals and has little or no role in SV recycling.     

Strain-induced Proliferation Requires the Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/AKT/Glycogen Synthase Kinase Pathway

The intestinal epithelium is repetitively deformed by shear, peristalsis, and villous motility. Such repetitive deformation stimulates the proliferation of intestinal epithelial cells on collagen or laminin substrates via ERK, but the upstream mediators of this effect are poorly understood. We hypothesized that the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT cascade mediates this mitogenic effect. PI3K, AKT, and glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β) were phosphorylated by 10 cycles/min strain at an average 10% deformation, and pharmacologic blockade of these molecules or reduction by small interfering RNA (siRNA) prevented the mitogenic effect of strain in Caco-2 or IEC-6 intestinal epithelial cells. Strain MAPK activation required PI3K but not AKT. AKT isoform-specific siRNA transfection demonstrated that AKT2 but not AKT1 is required for GSK-3β phosphorylation and the strain mitogenic effect. Furthermore, overexpression of AKT1 or an AKT chimera including the PH domain and hinge region of AKT2 and the catalytic domain and C-tail of AKT1 prevented strain activation of GSK-3β, but overexpression of AKT2 or a chimera including the PH domain and hinge region of AKT1 and the catalytic domain and C-tail of AKT2 did not. These data delineate a role for PI3K, AKT2, and GSK-3β in the mitogenic effect of strain. PI3K is required for both ERK and AKT2 activation, whereas AKT2 is sequentially required for GSK-3β. Furthermore, AKT2 specificity requires its catalytic domain and tail region. Manipulating this pathway may prevent mucosal atrophy and maintain the mucosal barrier in conditions such as ileus, sepsis, and prolonged fasting when peristalsis and villous motility are decreased and the mucosal barrier fails.Mechanical forces are part of the normal intestinal epithelial environment. Numerous different forces deform these cells including shear stress from endoluminal chyme, bowel peristalsis, and villous motility (1, 2). During normal bowel function the mucosa is subjected to injury that must be repaired to maintain the mucosal barrier (3, 4). Deformation patterns of the bowel are altered in conditions such as prolonged fasting, post-surgical ileus, and sepsis states, resulting in profoundly reduced mucosal deformation. When such states are prolonged, proliferation slows, the mucosa becomes atrophic, and bacterial translocation may ensue as the mucosal barrier of the gut breaks down (5–7).In vitro, repetitive deformation is trophic for intestinal epithelial cells (8) cultured on type I or type IV collagen or laminin. Human Caco-2 intestinal epithelial cells (9), non-transformed rat IEC-6 intestinal epithelial cells (10), and primary human intestinal epithelial cells isolated from surgical specimens (11) proliferate more rapidly in response to cyclic strain (12) unless substantial quantities of fibronectin are added to the media or matrix (11) to mimic the acute phase reaction of acute or chronic inflammation and injury. Cyclic strain also stimulates proliferation in HCT 116 colon cancer cells (13) and differentiation of Caco-2 cells cultured on a collagen substrate (9). This phenomenon has also been observed in vivo (14). Thus, repetitive deformation may help to maintain the normal homeostasis of the gut mucosa under non-inflammatory conditions. Previous work in our laboratory has implicated Src, focal adhesion kinase, and the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)² extracellular signal-related kinase (ERK) in the mitogenic effect of strain (10). Although p38 is also activated in Caco-2 cells subjected to cyclic strain on a collagen matrix, its activity is not required for the mitogenic effect of strain (12).Although often the PI3K/AKT pathway is thought of as a parallel pathway to the MAPK, this is not always the case. Protein kinase C isoenzymes differentially modulate thrombin effect on MAPK-dependent retinal pigment epithelial cell (RPE) proliferation, and it has been shown that PI3K or AKT inhibition prevented thrombin-induced ERK activation and RPE proliferation (15).PI3K, AKT, and glycogen synthase kinase (GSK), a downstream target of AKT (16), have been implemented in intestinal epithelial cell proliferation in numerous cell systems not involving strain (17–19) including uncontrolled proliferation in gastrointestinal cancers (20–22). Mechanical forces activate this pathway as well. PI3K and AKT are required for increased extracellular pressure to stimulate colon cancer cell adhesion (23), although the pathway by which pressure stimulates colon cancer cells in suspension differs from the response of adherent intestinal epithelial cells to repetitive deformation (24), and GSK is not involved in this effect.³ Repetitive strain also stimulates vascular endothelial cell proliferation via PI3K and AKT (25, 26), whereas respiratory strain stimulates angiogenic responses via PI3K (27). We, therefore, hypothesized that the PI3K/AKT/GSK axis would be involved in the mitogenic effects of repetitive deformation on a collagen matrix.To test this hypothesis, we used the Flexcell apparatus to rhythmically deform Caco-2 intestinal epithelial cells. IEC-6 cells were used to confirm key results. A frequency of 10 cycles per min was used, which is similar in order of magnitude to the frequency that the intestinal mucosa might be deformed by peristalsis or villous motility in vivo (28, 29). Mechanical forces such as repetitive deformation are likely cell-type and frequency-specific, as different cell types respond to different frequencies. Vascular endothelial cells respond to frequencies of 60–80 cycles/min (25), whereas intestinal epithelial cells may actually decrease proliferation in response to frequencies of 5 cycles/min (30). We characterized PI3K, AKT, and GSK phosphorylation with strain, blocked these molecules pharmacologically or by siRNA, and delineated the specificity of the AKT effect using isozyme-specific siRNA and transfection of AKT1/2 chimeras. We also characterized the interaction of this pathway with the activation of ERK by strain, which has previously been implicated in the mitogenic response (12).     

Mismatch Repair Protein Deficiency Compromises Cisplatin-induced Apoptotic Signaling

Mismatch repair (MMR) proteins participate in cytotoxicity induced by certain DNA damage-inducing agents, including cisplatin (cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II), CDDP), a cancer chemotherapeutic drug utilized clinically to treat a variety of malignancies. MMR proteins have been demonstrated to bind to CDDP-DNA adducts and initiate MMR protein-dependent cell death in cells treated with CDDP; however, the molecular events underlying this death remain unclear. As MMR proteins have been suggested to be important in clinical responses to CDDP, a clear understanding of MMR protein-dependent, CDDP-induced cell death is critical. In this report, we demonstrate MMR protein-dependent relocalization of cytochrome c to the cytoplasm and cleavage of caspase-9, caspase-3, and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase upon treatment of cells with CDDP. Chemical inhibition of caspases specifically attenuates CDDP/MMR protein-dependent cytotoxicity, suggesting that a caspase-dependent signaling mechanism is required for the execution of this cell death. p53 protein levels were up-regulated independently of MMR protein status, suggesting that p53 is not a mediator of MMR-dependent, CDDP-induced death. This work is the first indication of a required signaling mechanism in CDDP-induced, MMR protein-dependent cytotoxicity, which can be uncoupled from other CDDP response pathways, and defines a critical contribution of MMR proteins to the control of cell death.The MMR² system of proteins plays roles in diverse cellular processes, perhaps most notably in preserving genomic integrity by recognizing and facilitating the repair of post-DNA replication base pairing errors. Recognition of these errors and recruitment of repair machinery is performed by the MutSα complex (consisting of the MMR proteins MSH2 and MSH6) or MutSβ complex (consisting of MSH2 and MSH3). Defects in MMR proteins render cells hypermutable and promote microsatellite instability, a hallmark of MMR defects. MMR protein defects are found in a wide variety of sporadic cancers, as well as in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (1).In addition to their role in DNA repair, MMR proteins also play a role in cytotoxicity induced by specific types of DNA-damaging chemotherapeutic drugs, such as CDDP, which is utilized clinically to treat a number of different cancer types. MutSα recognizes multiple types of DNA damage, including 1,2-intrastrand CDDP adducts and O⁶-methylguanine lesions (2). Treatment of cells with compounds that induce these types of lesions, including CDDP and methylating agents such as N-methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG), results in MMR protein-dependent cell cycle arrest and cell death (3–7). This suggests that MMR proteins, in addition to their role in DNA repair, are also capable of initiating cell death in response to certain types of DNA damage.Cells treated with DNA-damaging agents frequently activate an apoptotic cell death pathway mediated by the mitochondria. This intrinsic death signaling pathway predominantly involves the coordinated activity of two groups of proteins: pro-death members of the Bcl-2 family that control the integrity of mitochondrial membranes, and members of the caspase family of cysteinyl proteases that proteolytically cleave intracellular substrates, giving rise to apoptotic morphology and destruction of the cell (8, 9). Pro-death Bcl-2 family members, such as Bax and Bak, target the outer mitochondrial membrane and cause the cytosolic release of pro-death factors residing within the mitochondria of unstressed cells (8). Predominant among these factors is cytochrome c, whose cytoplasmic localization results in the formation of a caspase-activating platform known as the apoptosome (10). This complex includes the adaptor protein Apaf-1, and when formed the apoptosome promotes the cleavage and activation of caspase-9 (11, 12). Once activated, this apical caspase proceeds to cleave and activate caspase-3, the predominant effector protease of apoptosis.A significant amount of evidence has been gathered illustrating MMR protein-dependent pro-death signaling in response to methylating agents (13–16, 3). In contrast, the MMR protein-dependent cytotoxic response to CDDP is largely unknown, with only the p53-related transactivator protein p73 and the c-Abl kinase clearly implicated as potential mediators of CDDP/MMR protein-dependent cell death in human cells (17, 18). Interestingly, ATM, Chk1, Chk2, and p53, which are activated in an MMR protein-dependent manner after treatment of cells with MNNG (3, 13), are not involved in the MMR-dependent response to CDDP (7, 17). In addition, the magnitude of MMR protein-dependent cell death induced by methylating agents and CDDP differs (4). These findings suggest that unique signaling pathways may be engaged by MMR proteins depending upon the type of recognized lesion. As such, there is a requirement for further study of the molecular events underlying MMR protein-dependent cell death and cell cycle arrest for each type of recognized DNA lesion. This is particularly relevant in the case of CDDP, as evidence from a limited number of retrospective clinical studies suggests that MMR proteins play an important role in patient response to CDDP. Several studies examining immunohistochemical staining against MSH2 or MLH1 have demonstrated that levels of these proteins are reduced in ovarian and esophageal tumor samples following CDDP-based chemotherapy (19, 20). Low levels of MMR protein post-chemotherapy seem to be predictive of lower overall survival in a certain subset of tumors (esophageal cancer), but not others (ovarian and non-small cell lung cancer) (19–21). Two recent studies examining MMR protein levels and microsatellite instability in germ cell tumors from patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy have suggested a prognostic value for pre-chemotherapy MMR protein status in these tumors (22, 23). This potential clinical relevance underscores the need for a greater understanding of MMR protein-dependent mechanisms of CDDP-induced cell death.In this study, we report that CDDP induces an MMR protein-dependent decrease in cell viability and MMR protein-dependent signaling in the form of cytochrome c release to the cytoplasm and cleavage of caspase-9, caspase-3, and PARP. Chemical inhibition of caspases specifically attenuates CDDP/MMR protein-dependent loss of cell viability, indicating a requirement for caspase activation in this process and uncoupling MMR protein-dependent cytotoxic signaling from other CDDP response pathways. Additionally, the CDDP-induced, MMR protein-dependent cytotoxic response is independent of p53 signaling. Our results demonstrate for the first time an MMR protein-dependent pro-death signaling pathway in cells treated with CDDP.     

LFA-1 Affinity Regulation Is Necessary for the Activation and Proliferation of Naive T Cells

The activation of LFA-1 (lymphocyte function-associated antigen) is a critical event for T cell co-stimulation. The mechanism of LFA-1 activation involves both affinity and avidity regulation, but the role of each in T cell activation remains unclear. We have identified antibodies that recognize and block different affinity states of the mouse LFA-1 I-domain. Monoclonal antibody 2D7 preferentially binds to the low affinity conformation, and this specific binding is abolished when LFA-1 is locked in the high affinity conformation. In contrast, M17/4 can bind both the locked high and low affinity forms of LFA-1. Although both 2D7 and M17/4 are blocking antibodies, 2D7 is significantly less potent than M17/4 in blocking LFA-1-mediated adhesion; thus, blocking high affinity LFA-1 is critical for preventing LFA-1-mediated adhesion. Using these reagents, we investigated whether LFA-1 affinity regulation affects T cell activation. We found that blocking high affinity LFA-1 prevents interleukin-2 production and T cell proliferation, demonstrated by TCR cross-linking and antigen-specific stimulation. Furthermore, there is a differential requirement of high affinity LFA-1 in the activation of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells. Although CD4⁺ T cell activation depends on both high and low affinity LFA-1, only high affinity LFA-1 provides co-stimulation for CD8⁺ T cell activation. Together, our data demonstrated that the I-domain of LFA-1 changes to the high affinity state in primary T cells, and high affinity LFA-1 is critical for facilitating T cell activation. This implicates LFA-1 activation as a novel regulatory mechanism for the modulation of T cell activation and proliferation.LFA-1 (lymphocyte function-associated antigen), an integrin family member, is important in regulating leukocyte adhesion and T cell activation (1, 2). LFA-1 consists of the α_L (CD11a) and β₂ (CD18) heterodimer. The ligands for LFA-1, including intercellular adhesion molecule ICAM³-1, ICAM-2, and ICAM-3, are expressed on antigen-presenting cells (APCs), endothelial cells, and lymphocytes (1). Mice that are deficient in LFA-1 have defects in leukocyte adhesion, lymphocyte proliferation, and tumor rejection (3–5). Blocking LFA-1 with antibodies can prevent inflammation, autoimmunity, organ graft rejection, and graft versus host disease in human and murine models (6–10).LFA-1 is constitutively expressed on the surface of leukocytes in an inactive state. Activation of LFA-1 is mediated by inside-out signals from the cytoplasm (1, 11). Subsequently, activated LFA-1 binds to the ligands and transduces outside-in signals back into the cytoplasm that result in cell adhesion and activation (12, 13). The activation of LFA-1 is a critical event in the formation of the immunological synapse, which is important for T cell activation (2, 14, 15). The active state of LFA-1 is regulated by chemokines and the T cell receptor (TCR) through Rap1 signaling (16). LFA-1 ligation lowers the activation threshold and affects polarization in CD4⁺ T cells (17). Moreover, productive LFA-1 engagement facilitates efficient activation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes and initiates a distinct signal essential for the effector function (18–20). Thus, LFA-1 activation is essential for the optimal activation of T cells.The mechanism of LFA-1 activation involves both affinity (conformational changes within the molecule) and avidity (receptor clustering) regulation (21–23). The I-domain of the LFA-1 α_L subunit is the primary ligand-binding site and has been proposed to change conformation, leading to an increased affinity for ligands (24–26). The structural basis of the conformational changes in the I-domain of LFA-1 has been extensively characterized (27). Previously, we have demonstrated that the conformation of the LFA-1 I-domain changes from the low affinity to the high affinity state upon activation. By introducing disulfide bonds into the I-domain, LFA-1 can be locked in either the closed or open conformation, which represents the “low affinity” or “high affinity” state, respectively (28, 29). In addition, we identified antibodies that are sensitive to the affinity changes in the I-domain of human LFA-1 and showed that the activation-dependent epitopes are exposed upon activation (30). This study supports the presence of the high affinity conformation upon LFA-1 activation in cell lines. It has been demonstrated recently that therapeutic antagonists, such as statins, inhibit LFA-1 activation and immune responses by locking LFA-1 in the low affinity state (31–34). Furthermore, high affinity LFA-1 has been shown to be important for mediating the adhesion of human T cells (35, 36). Thus, the affinity regulation is a critical step in LFA-1 activation.LFA-1 is a molecule of great importance in the immune system, and its activation state influences the outcome of T cell activation. Our previous data using the activating LFA-1 I-domain-specific antibody MEM83 indicate that avidity and affinity of the integrin can be coupled during activation (37). However, whether affinity or avidity regulation of LFA-1 contributes to T cell activation remains controversial (23, 38, 39). Despite the recent progress suggesting that conformational changes represent a key step in the activation of LFA-1, there are considerable gaps to be filled. When LFA-1 is activated, the subsequent outside-in signaling contributes to T cell activation via immunological synapse and LFA-1-dependent signaling. It is critical to determine whether high affinity LFA-1 participates in the outside-in signaling and affects the cellular activation of T cells. Nevertheless, the rapid and dynamic process of LFA-1 activation has hampered further understanding of the role of high affinity LFA-1 in primary T cell activation. The affinity of LFA-1 for ICAM-1 increases up to 10,000-fold within seconds and involves multiple reversible steps (23). In addition, the activation of LFA-1 regulates both adhesion and activation of T cells, two separate yet closely associated cellular functions. When LFA-1 is constitutively expressed in the active state in mice, immune responses are broadly impaired rather than hyperactivated, suggesting the complexity of affinity regulation (40). Therefore, it is difficult to dissect the mechanisms by which high affinity LFA-1 regulates stepwise activation of T cells in the whole animal system.In the present study, we identified antibodies recognizing and blocking different affinity states of mouse LFA-1. These reagents allowed us to determine the role of affinity regulation in T cell activation. We found that blocking high affinity LFA-1 inhibited IL-2 production and proliferation in T cells. Furthermore, there is a differential requirement of high affinity LFA-1 in antigen-specific activation of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells. The activation of CD4⁺ T cells depends on both high and low affinity LFA-1. For CD8⁺ T cell activation, only high affinity LFA-1 provides co-stimulation. Thus, affinity regulation of LFA-1 is critical for the activation and proliferation of naive T cells.     

Noonan Syndrome/Leukemia-associated Gain-of-function Mutations in SHP-2 Phosphatase (PTPN11) Enhance Cell Migration and Angiogenesis

Mutations in SHP-2 phosphatase (PTPN11) that cause hyperactivation of its catalytic activity have been identified in Noonan syndrome and various childhood leukemias. Recent studies suggest that the gain-of-function (GOF) mutations of SHP-2 play a causal role in the pathogenesis of these diseases. However, the molecular mechanisms by which GOF mutations of SHP-2 induce these phenotypes are not fully understood. Here, we show that GOF mutations in SHP-2, such as E76K and D61G, drastically increase spreading and migration of various cell types, including hematopoietic cells, endothelial cells, and fibroblasts. More importantly, in vivo angiogenesis in SHP-2 D61G knock-in mice is also enhanced. Mechanistic studies suggest that the increased cell migration is attributed to the enhanced β1 integrin outside-in signaling. In response to β1 integrin cross-linking or fibronectin stimulation, activation of ERK and Akt kinases is greatly increased by SHP-2 GOF mutations. Also, integrin-induced activation of RhoA and Rac1 GTPases is elevated. Interestingly, mutant cells with the SHP-2 GOF mutation (D61G) are more sensitive than wild-type cells to the suppression of cell motility by inhibition of these pathways. Collectively, these studies reaffirm the positive role of SHP-2 phosphatase in cell motility and suggest a new mechanism by which SHP-2 GOF mutations contribute to diseases.SHP-2, a multifunctional SH2 domain-containing protein-tyrosine phosphatase implicated in diverse cell signaling processes (1–3), plays a critical role in cellular function. Homozygous deletion of Exon 2 (4) or Exon 3 (5) of the SHP-2 gene (PTPN11) in mice leads to early embryonic lethality prior to and at midgestation, respectively. SHP-2 null mutant mice die much earlier, at peri-implantation (4). Exon 3 deletion mutation of SHP-2 blocks hematopoietic potential of embryonic stem cells both in vitro and in vivo (6–8), whereas SHP-2 null mutation causes inner cell mass death and diminished trophoblast stem cell survival (4). Recent studies on SHP-2 conditional knock-out or tissue-specific knock-out mice have further revealed an array of important functions of this phosphatase in various physiological processes (9–12). The phenotypes demonstrated by loss of SHP-2 function are apparently attributed to the role of SHP-2 in the cell signaling pathways induced by growth factors/cytokines. SHP-2 generally promotes signal transmission in growth factor/cytokine signaling in both catalytic-dependent and -independent fashion (1–3). The positive role of SHP-2 in the intracellular signaling processes, in particular, the ERK³ and PI3K/Akt kinase pathways, has been well established, although the underlying mechanism remains elusive, in particular, the signaling function of the catalytic activity of SHP-2 in these pathways is poorly understood.In addition to the role of SHP-2 in cell proliferation and differentiation, the phenotypes induced by loss of SHP-2 function may be associated with its role in cell migration. Indeed, dominant negative SHP-2 disrupts Xenopus gastrulation, causing tail truncations (13, 14). Targeted Exon 3 deletion mutation in SHP-2 results in decreased cell spreading, migration (15, 16), and impaired limb development in the chimeric mice (7). The role of SHP-2 in cell adhesion and migration has also been demonstrated by catalytically inactive mutant SHP-2-overexpressing cells (17–20). The molecular mechanisms by which SHP-2 regulates these cellular processes, however, have not been well defined. For example, the role of SHP-2 in the activation of the Rho family small GTPases that is critical for cell motility is still controversial. Both positive (19, 21, 22) and negative roles (18, 23) for SHP-2 in this context have been reported. Part of the reason for this discrepancy might be due to the difference in the cell models used. Catalytically inactive mutant SHP-2 was often used to determine the role of SHP-2 in cell signaling. In the catalytically inactive mutant SHP-2-overexpressing cells, the catalytic activity of endogenous SHP-2 is inhibited. However, as SHP-2 also functions independent of its catalytic activity, overexpression of catalytically deficient SHP-2 may also increase its scaffolding function, generating complex effects.The critical role of SHP-2 in cellular function is further underscored by the identification of SHP-2 mutations in human diseases. Genetic lesions in PTPN11 that cause hyperactivation of SHP-2 catalytic activity have been identified in the developmental disorder Noonan syndrome (24) and various childhood leukemias, including juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML), B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and acute myeloid leukemia (25, 26). In addition, activating mutations in SHP-2 have been identified in sporadic solid tumors (27). The SHP-2 mutations appear to play a causal role in the development of these diseases as SHP-2 mutations and other JMML-associated Ras or Neurofibromatosis 1 mutations are mutually exclusive in the patients (24–27). Moreover, single SHP-2 gain-of-function (GOF) mutations are sufficient to induce Noonan syndrome, cytokine hypersensitivity in hematopoietic progenitor cells, and JMML-like myeloproliferative disease in mice (28–32). Gain-of-function cell models derived from the newly available SHP-2 GOF mutation (D61G) knock-in mice (28) now provide us with a good opportunity to clarify the role of SHP-2 in cell motility. Unlike the dominant negative approach in which overexpression of mutant forms of SHP-2 generates complex effects, the SHP-2 D61G knock-in model eliminates this possibility as the mutant SHP-2 is expressed at the physiological level (28). Additionally, defining signaling functions of GOF mutant SHP-2 in cell movement can also help elucidate the molecular mechanisms by which SHP-2 mutations contribute to the relevant diseases.