共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 93 毫秒
1.
2.
John W. Hardin Francis E. Reyes Robert T. Batey 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(22):15317-15324
In archaea and eukarya, box C/D ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes are
responsible for 2′-O-methylation of tRNAs and rRNAs. The
archaeal box C/D small RNP complex requires a small RNA component (sRNA)
possessing Watson-Crick complementarity to the target RNA along with three
proteins: L7Ae, Nop5p, and fibrillarin. Transfer of a methyl group from
S-adenosylmethionine to the target RNA is performed by fibrillarin,
which by itself has no affinity for the sRNA-target duplex. Instead, it is
targeted to the site of methylation through association with Nop5p, which in
turn binds to the L7Ae-sRNA complex. To understand how Nop5p serves as a
bridge between the targeting and catalytic functions of the box C/D small RNP
complex, we have employed alanine scanning to evaluate the interaction between
the Pyrococcus horikoshii Nop5p domain and an L7Ae box C/D RNA
complex. From these data, we were able to construct an isolated RNA-binding
domain (Nop-RBD) that folds correctly as demonstrated by x-ray crystallography
and binds to the L7Ae box C/D RNA complex with near wild type affinity. These
data demonstrate that the Nop-RBD is an autonomously folding and functional
module important for protein assembly in a number of complexes centered on the
L7Ae-kinkturn RNP.Many biological RNAs require extensive modification to attain full
functionality in the cell (1).
Currently there are over 100 known RNA modification types ranging from small
functional group substitutions to the addition of large multi-cyclic ring
structures (2). Transfer RNA,
one of many functional RNAs targeted for modification
(3-6),
possesses the greatest modification type diversity, many of which are
important for proper biological function
(7). Ribosomal RNA, on the
other hand, contains predominantly two types of modified nucleotides:
pseudouridine and 2′-O-methylribose
(8). The crystal structures of
the ribosome suggest that these modifications are important for proper folding
(9,
10) and structural
stabilization (11) in
vivo as evidenced by their strong tendency to localize to regions
associated with function (8,
12,
13). These roles have been
verified biochemically in a number of cases
(14), whereas newly emerging
functional modifications are continually being investigated.Box C/D ribonucleoprotein
(RNP)3 complexes serve
as RNA-guided site-specific 2′-O-methyltransferases in both
archaea and eukaryotes (15,
16) where they are referred to
as small RNP complexes and small nucleolar RNPs, respectively. Target RNA
pairs with the sRNA guide sequence and is methylated at the 2′-hydroxyl
group of the nucleotide five bases upstream of either the D or D′ box
motif of the sRNA (Fig. 1,
star) (17,
18). In archaea, the internal
C′ and D′ motifs generally conform to a box C/D consensus sequence
(19), and each sRNA contains
two guide regions ∼12 nucleotides in length
(20). The bipartite
architecture of the RNP potentially enables the complex to methylate two
distinct RNA targets (21) and
has been shown to be essential for site-specific methylation
(22).Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.Organization of the archaeal box C/D complex. The protein components
of this RNP are L7Ae, Nop5p, and fibrillarin, which together bind a box C/D
sRNA. The regions of the Box C/D sRNA corresponding to the conserved C, D,
C′, and D′ boxes are labeled. The target RNA binds the sRNA
through Watson-Crick pairing and is methylated by fibrillarin at the fifth
nucleotide from the D/D′ boxes (star).In addition to the sRNA, the archaeal box C/D complex requires three
proteins for activity (23):
the ribosomal protein L7Ae
(24,
25), fibrillarin, and the
Nop56/Nop58 homolog Nop5p (Fig.
1). L7Ae binds to both box C/D and the C′/D′ motifs
(26), which respectively
comprise kink-turn (27) or
k-loop structures (28), to
initiate the assembly of the RNP
(29,
30). Fibrillarin performs the
methyl group transfer from the cofactor S-adenosylmethionine to the
target RNA
(31-33).
For this to occur, the active site of fibrillarin must be positioned precisely
over the specific 2′-hydroxyl group to be methylated. Although
fibrillarin methylates this functional group in the context of a Watson-Crick
base-paired helix (guide/target), it has little to no binding affinity for
double-stranded RNA or for the L7Ae-sRNA complex
(22,
26,
33,
34). Nop5p serves as an
intermediary protein bringing fibrillarin to the complex through its
association with both the L7Ae-sRNA complex and fibrillarin
(22). Along with its role as
an intermediary between fibrillarin and the L7Ae-sRNA complex, Nop5p possesses
other functions not yet fully understood. For example, Nop5p self-dimerizes
through a coiled-coil domain
(35) that in most archaea and
eukaryotic homologs includes a small insertion sequence of unknown function
(36,
37). However, dimerization and
fibrillarin binding have been shown to be mutually exclusive in
Methanocaldococcus jannaschii Nop5p, potentially because of the
presence of this insertion sequence
(36). Thus, whether Nop5p is a
monomer or a dimer in the active RNP is still under debate.In this study, we focus our attention on the Nop5p protein to investigate
its interaction with a L7Ae box C/D RNA complex because both the
fibrillarin-Nop5p and the L7Ae box C/D RNA interfaces are known from crystal
structures (29,
35,
38). Individual residues on
the surface of a monomeric form of Nop5p (referred to as mNop5p)
(22) were mutated to alanine,
and the effect on binding affinity for a L7Ae box C/D motif RNA complex was
assessed through the use of electrophoretic mobility shift assays. These data
reveal that residues important for binding cluster within the highly conserved
NOP domain (39,
40). To demonstrate that this
domain is solely responsible for the affinity of Nop5p for the preassembled
L7Ae box C/D RNA complex, we expressed and purified it in isolation from the
full Nop5p protein. The isolated Nop-RBD domain binds to the L7Ae box C/D RNA
complex with nearly wild type affinity, demonstrating that the Nop-RBD is
truly an autonomously folding and functional module. Comparison of our data
with the crystal structure of the homologous spliceosomal hPrp31-15.5K
protein-U4 snRNA complex (41)
suggests the adoption of a similar mode of binding, further supporting a
crucial role for the NOP domain in RNP complex assembly. 相似文献
3.
4.
5.
Kuen-Feng Chen Pei-Yen Yeh Chiun Hsu Chih-Hung Hsu Yen-Shen Lu Hsing-Pang Hsieh Pei-Jer Chen Ann-Lii Cheng 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(17):11121-11133
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common and aggressive
human malignancies. Recombinant tumor necrosis factor-related
apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) is a promising anti-tumor agent. However,
many HCC cells show resistance to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. In this study, we
showed that bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, overcame TRAIL resistance in
HCC cells, including Huh-7, Hep3B, and Sk-Hep1. The combination of bortezomib
and TRAIL restored the sensitivity of HCC cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis.
Comparing the molecular change in HCC cells treated with these agents, we
found that down-regulation of phospho-Akt (P-Akt) played a key role in
mediating TRAIL sensitization of bortezomib. The first evidence was that
bortezomib down-regulated P-Akt in a dose- and time-dependent manner in
TRAIL-treated HCC cells. Second, , a PI3K inhibitor, also sensitized
resistant HCC cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Third, knocking down Akt1 by
small interference RNA also enhanced TRAIL-induced apoptosis in Huh-7 cells.
Finally, ectopic expression of mutant Akt (constitutive active) in HCC cells
abolished TRAIL sensitization effect of bortezomib. Moreover, okadaic acid, a
protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) inhibitor, reversed down-regulation of P-Akt in
bortezomib-treated cells, and PP2A knockdown by small interference RNA also
reduced apoptosis induced by the combination of TRAIL and bortezomib,
indicating that PP2A may be important in mediating the effect of bortezomib on
TRAIL sensitization. Together, bortezomib overcame TRAIL resistance at
clinically achievable concentrations in hepatocellular carcinoma cells, and
this effect is mediated at least partly via inhibition of the PI3K/Akt
pathway.Hepatocellular carcinoma
(HCC) LY2940022 is currently
the fifth most common solid tumor worldwide and the fourth leading cause of
cancer-related death. To date, surgery is still the only curative treatment
but is only feasible in a small portion of patients
(1). Drug treatment is the
major therapy for patients with advanced stage disease. Unfortunately, the
response rate to traditional chemotherapy for HCC patients is unsatisfactory
(1). Novel pharmacological
therapy is urgently needed for patients with advanced HCC. In this regard, the
approval of sorafenib might open a new era of molecularly targeted therapy in
the treatment of HCC patients.Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), a
type II transmembrane protein and a member of the TNF family, is a promising
anti-tumor agent under clinical investigation
(2). TRAIL functions by
engaging its receptors expressed on the surface of target cells. Five
receptors specific for TRAIL have been identified, including DR4/TRAIL-R1,
DR5/TRAIL-R2, DcR1, DcR2, and osteoprotegerin. Among TRAIL receptors, only DR4
and DR5 contain an effective death domain that is essential to formation of
death-inducing signaling complex (DISC), a critical step for TRAIL-induced
apoptosis. Notably, the trimerization of the death domains recruits an adaptor
molecule, Fas-associated protein with death domain (FADD), which subsequently
recruits and activates caspase-8. In type I cells, activation of caspase-8 is
sufficient to activate caspase-3 to induce apoptosis; however, in another type
of cells (type II), the intrinsic mitochondrial pathway is essential for
apoptosis characterized by cleavage of Bid and release of cytochrome
c from mitochondria, which subsequently activates caspase-9 and
caspase-3 (3).Although TRAIL induces apoptosis in malignant cells but sparing normal
cells, some tumor cells are resistant to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Mechanisms
responsible for the resistance include receptors and intracellular resistance.
Although the cell surface expression of DR4 or DR5 is absolutely required for
TRAIL-induced apoptosis, tumor cells expressing these death receptors are not
always sensitive to TRAIL due to intracellular mechanisms. For example, the
cellular FLICE-inhibitory protein (c-FLIP), a homologue to caspase-8 but
without protease activity, has been linked to TRAIL resistance in several
studies (4,
5). In addition, inactivation
of Bax, a proapoptotic Bcl-2 family protein, resulted in resistance to TRAIL
in MMR-deficient tumors (6,
7), and reintroduction of Bax
into Bax-deficient cells restored TRAIL sensitivity
(8), indicating that the Bcl-2
family plays a critical role in intracellular mechanisms for resistance of
TRAIL.Bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor approved clinically for multiple myeloma
and mantle cell lymphoma, has been investigated intensively for many types of
cancer (9). Accumulating
studies indicate that the combination of bortezomib and TRAIL overcomes the
resistance to TRAIL in various types of cancer, including acute myeloid
leukemia (4), lymphoma
(10–13),
prostate
(14–17),
colon (15,
18,
19), bladder
(14,
16), renal cell carcinoma
(20), thyroid
(21), ovary
(22), non-small cell lung
(23,
24), sarcoma
(25), and HCC
(26,
27). Molecular targets
responsible for the sensitizing effect of bortezomib on TRAIL-induced cell
death include DR4 (14,
27), DR5
(14,
20,
22–23,
28), c-FLIP
(4,
11,
21–23,
29), NF-κB
(12,
24,
30), p21
(16,
21,
25), and p27
(25). In addition, Bcl-2
family also plays a role in the combinational effect of bortezomib and TRAIL,
including Bcl-2 (10,
21), Bax
(13,
22), Bak
(27), Bcl-xL
(21), Bik
(18), and Bim
(15).Recently, we have reported that Akt signaling is a major molecular
determinant in bortezomib-induced apoptosis in HCC cells
(31). In this study, we
demonstrated that bortezomib overcame TRAIL resistance in HCC cells through
inhibition of the PI3K/Akt pathway. 相似文献
6.
7.
Ruben K. Dagda Salvatore J. Cherra III Scott M. Kulich Anurag Tandon David Park Charleen T. Chu 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(20):13843-13855
Mitochondrial dysregulation is strongly implicated in Parkinson disease.
Mutations in PTEN-induced kinase 1 (PINK1) are associated with familial
parkinsonism and neuropsychiatric disorders. Although overexpressed PINK1 is
neuroprotective, less is known about neuronal responses to loss of PINK1
function. We found that stable knockdown of PINK1 induced mitochondrial
fragmentation and autophagy in SH-SY5Y cells, which was reversed by the
reintroduction of an RNA interference (RNAi)-resistant plasmid for PINK1.
Moreover, stable or transient overexpression of wild-type PINK1 increased
mitochondrial interconnectivity and suppressed toxin-induced
autophagy/mitophagy. Mitochondrial oxidant production played an essential role
in triggering mitochondrial fragmentation and autophagy in PINK1 shRNA lines.
Autophagy/mitophagy served a protective role in limiting cell death, and
overexpressing Parkin further enhanced this protective mitophagic response.
The dominant negative Drp1 mutant inhibited both fission and mitophagy in
PINK1-deficient cells. Interestingly, RNAi knockdown of autophagy proteins
Atg7 and LC3/Atg8 also decreased mitochondrial fragmentation without affecting
oxidative stress, suggesting active involvement of autophagy in morphologic
remodeling of mitochondria for clearance. To summarize, loss of PINK1 function
elicits oxidative stress and mitochondrial turnover coordinated by the
autophagic and fission/fusion machineries. Furthermore, PINK1 and Parkin may
cooperate through different mechanisms to maintain mitochondrial
homeostasis.Parkinson disease is an age-related neurodegenerative disease that affects
∼1% of the population worldwide. The causes of sporadic cases are unknown,
although mitochondrial or oxidative toxins such as
1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium, 6-hydroxydopamine
(6-OHDA),3 and
rotenone reproduce features of the disease in animal and cell culture models
(1). Abnormalities in
mitochondrial respiration and increased oxidative stress are observed in cells
and tissues from parkinsonian patients
(2,
3), which also exhibit
increased mitochondrial autophagy
(4). Furthermore, mutations in
parkinsonian genes affect oxidative stress response pathways and mitochondrial
homeostasis (5). Thus,
disruption of mitochondrial homeostasis represents a major factor implicated
in the pathogenesis of sporadic and inherited parkinsonian disorders (PD).The PARK6 locus involved in autosomal recessive and early-onset PD
encodes for PTEN-induced kinase 1 (PINK1)
(6,
7). PINK1 is a cytosolic and
mitochondrially localized 581-amino acid serine/threonine kinase that
possesses an N-terminal mitochondrial targeting sequence
(6,
8). The primary sequence also
includes a putative transmembrane domain important for orientation of the
PINK1 domain (8), a conserved
kinase domain homologous to calcium calmodulin kinases, and a C-terminal
domain that regulates autophosphorylation activity
(9,
10). Overexpression of
wild-type PINK1, but not its PD-associated mutants, protects against several
toxic insults in neuronal cells
(6,
11,
12). Mitochondrial targeting
is necessary for some (13) but
not all of the neuroprotective effects of PINK1
(14), implicating involvement
of cytoplasmic targets that modulate mitochondrial pathobiology
(8). PINK1 catalytic activity
is necessary for its neuroprotective role, because a kinase-deficient K219M
substitution in the ATP binding pocket of PINK1 abrogates its ability to
protect neurons (14). Although
PINK1 mutations do not seem to impair mitochondrial targeting, PD-associated
mutations differentially destabilize the protein, resulting in loss of
neuroprotective activities
(13,
15).Recent studies indicate that PINK1 and Parkin interact genetically
(3,
16-18)
to prevent oxidative stress
(19,
20) and regulate mitochondrial
morphology (21). Primary cells
derived from PINK1 mutant patients exhibit mitochondrial fragmentation with
disorganized cristae, recapitulated by RNA interference studies in HeLa cells
(3).Mitochondria are degraded by macroautophagy, a process involving
sequestration of cytoplasmic cargo into membranous autophagic vacuoles (AVs)
for delivery to lysosomes (22,
23). Interestingly,
mitochondrial fission accompanies autophagic neurodegeneration elicited by the
PD neurotoxin 6-OHDA (24,
25). Moreover, mitochondrial
fragmentation and increased autophagy are observed in neurodegenerative
diseases including Alzheimer and Parkinson diseases
(4,
26-28).
Although inclusion of mitochondria in autophagosomes was once believed to be a
random process, as observed during starvation, studies involving hypoxia,
mitochondrial damage, apoptotic stimuli, or limiting amounts of aerobic
substrates in facultative anaerobes support the concept of selective
mitochondrial autophagy (mitophagy)
(29,
30). In particular,
mitochondrially localized kinases may play an important role in models
involving oxidative mitochondrial injury
(25,
31,
32).Autophagy is involved in the clearance of protein aggregates
(33-35)
and normal regulation of axonal-synaptic morphology
(36). Chronic disruption of
lysosomal function results in accumulation of subtly impaired mitochondria
with decreased calcium buffering capacity
(37), implicating an important
role for autophagy in mitochondrial homeostasis
(37,
38). Recently, Parkin, which
complements the effects of PINK1 deficiency on mitochondrial morphology
(3), was found to promote
autophagy of depolarized mitochondria
(39). Conversely, Beclin
1-independent autophagy/mitophagy contributes to cell death elicited by the PD
toxins 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium and 6-OHDA
(25,
28,
31,
32), causing neurite
retraction in cells expressing a PD-linked mutation in leucine-rich repeat
kinase 2 (40). Whereas
properly regulated autophagy plays a homeostatic and neuroprotective role,
excessive or incomplete autophagy creates a condition of “autophagic
stress” that can contribute to neurodegeneration
(28).As mitochondrial fragmentation
(3) and increased mitochondrial
autophagy (4) have been
described in human cells or tissues of PD patients, we investigated whether or
not the engineered loss of PINK1 function could recapitulate these
observations in human neuronal cells (SH-SY5Y). Stable knockdown of endogenous
PINK1 gave rise to mitochondrial fragmentation and increased autophagy and
mitophagy, whereas stable or transient overexpression of PINK1 had the
opposite effect. Autophagy/mitophagy was dependent upon increased
mitochondrial oxidant production and activation of fission. The data indicate
that PINK1 is important for the maintenance of mitochondrial networks,
suggesting that coordinated regulation of mitochondrial dynamics and autophagy
limits cell death associated with loss of PINK1 function. 相似文献
8.
9.
Gaetan Pascreau Frank Eckerdt Andrea L. Lewellyn Claude Prigent James L. Maller 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(9):5497-5505
p53 is an important tumor suppressor regulating the cell cycle at multiple
stages in higher vertebrates. The p53 gene is frequently deleted or mutated in
human cancers, resulting in loss of p53 activity. This leads to centrosome
amplification, aneuploidy, and tumorigenesis, three phenotypes also observed
after overexpression of the oncogenic kinase Aurora A. Accordingly, recent
studies have focused on the relationship between these two proteins. p53 and
Aurora A have been reported to interact in mammalian cells, but the function
of this interaction remains unclear. We recently reported that
Xenopus p53 can inhibit Aurora A activity in vitro but only
in the absence of TPX2. Here we investigate the interplay between
Xenopus Aurora A, TPX2, and p53 and show that newly synthesized TPX2
is required for nearly all Aurora A activation and for full p53 synthesis and
phosphorylation in vivo during oocyte maturation. In vitro,
phosphorylation mediated by Aurora A targets serines 129 and 190 within the
DNA binding domain of p53. Glutathione S-transferase pull-down
studies indicate that the interaction occurs via the p53 transactivation
domain and the Aurora A catalytic domain around the T-loop. Our studies
suggest that targeting of TPX2 might be an effective strategy for specifically
inhibiting the phosphorylation of Aurora A substrates, including p53.Aurora A is an oncogenic protein kinase that is active in mitosis and plays
important roles in spindle assembly and centrosome function
(1). Overexpression of either
human or Xenopus Aurora A transforms mammalian cells, but only when
the p53 pathway is altered
(2–4).
Aurora A is localized on centrosomes during mitosis, and overexpression of the
protein leads to centrosome amplification and aneuploidy
(2,
3,
5,
6), two likely contributors to
genomic instability (7,
8). Because of its oncogenic
potential and amplification in human tumors, considerable attention has been
focused on the mechanism of Aurora A activation in mitosis. Evidence from
several laboratories indicates that activation occurs as a result of
phosphorylation of a threonine residue in the T-loop of the kinase
(4,
9,
10). Purification of Aurora
A-activating activity from M phase Xenopus egg extracts led to an
apparent activation mechanism in which autophosphorylation at the T-loop is
stimulated by binding of the targeting protein for Xklp2 (TPX2)
(11–14).
On the other hand, it has been shown that Aurora A activity can be inhibited
by interaction with several proteins, including PP1 (protein phosphatase 1),
AIP (Aurora A kinase-interacting protein), and, more recently, p53
(9,
15–17).p53 is a well known tumor suppressor able to drive cell cycle arrest,
apoptosis, or senescence when DNA is damaged or cell integrity is threatened
(18,
19). In human cancers, the p53
gene is frequently deleted or mutated, leading to inactivation of p53
functions (20). p53 protein is
almost undetectable in “normal cells,” mainly due to its
instability. Indeed, during a normal cell cycle, p53 associates with Mdm2 in
the nucleus and thereafter undergoes nuclear exclusion, allowing its
ubiquitination and subsequent degradation
(21). In cells under stress,
p53 is stabilized through the disruption of its interaction with Mdm2
(21), leading to p53
accumulation in the nucleus and triggering different responses, as described
above.Although p53 has mostly been characterized as a nuclear protein, it has
also been shown to localize on centrosomes
(22–24)
and regulate centrosome duplication
(23,
24). Centrosomes are believed
to act as scaffolds that concentrate many regulatory molecules involved in
signal transduction, including multiple protein kinases
(25). Thus, centrosomal
localization of p53 might be important for its own regulation by
phosphorylation/dephosphorylation, and one of its regulators could be the
mitotic kinase Aurora A. Indeed, phenotypes associated with the misexpression
of these two proteins are very similar. For example, overexpression of Aurora
A kinase leads to centrosome amplification, aneuploidy, and tumorigenesis, and
the same effects are often observed after down-regulation of p53
transactivation activity or deletion/mutation of its gene
(26,
27).Several recent studies performed in mammalian models show interplay between
p53 and Aurora A, with each protein having the ability to inhibit the other,
depending on the stage of the cell cycle and the stress level of the cell
(17,
28,
29). These studies reported
that p53 is a substrate of Aurora A, and serines 215 and 315 were demonstrated
to be the two major Aurora A phosphorylation sites in human p53 in
vitro and in vivo. Phosphorylation of Ser-215 within the DNA
binding domain of human p53 inhibited both p53 DNA binding and transactivation
activities (29). Recently, our
group showed that Xenopus p53 is able to inhibit Aurora A kinase
activity in vitro, but this inhibitory effect can be suppressed by
prior binding of Aurora A to TPX2
(9). Contrary to somatic cells,
where p53 is nuclear, unstable, and expressed at a very low level, p53 is
highly expressed in the cytoplasm of Xenopus oocytes and stable until
later stages of development
(30,
31). The high concentration of
both p53 and Aurora A in the oocyte provided a suitable basis for
investigating p53-Aurora A interaction and also evaluating Xenopus
p53 as a substrate of Aurora A. 相似文献
10.
Isabel Molina-Ortiz Rub��n A. Bartolom�� Pablo Hern��ndez-Varas Georgina P. Colo Joaquin Teixid�� 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(22):15147-15157
Melanoma cells express the chemokine receptor CXCR4 that confers high
invasiveness upon binding to its ligand CXCL12. Melanoma cells at initial
stages of the disease show reduction or loss of E-cadherin expression, but
recovery of its expression is frequently found at advanced phases. We
overexpressed E-cadherin in the highly invasive BRO lung metastatic cell
melanoma cell line to investigate whether it could influence CXCL12-promoted
cell invasion. Overexpression of E-cadherin led to defective invasion of
melanoma cells across Matrigel and type I collagen in response to CXCL12. A
decrease in individual cell migration directionality toward the chemokine and
reduced adhesion accounted for the impaired invasion. A p190RhoGAP-dependent
inhibition of RhoA activation was responsible for the impairment in
chemokine-stimulated E-cadherin melanoma transfectant invasion. Furthermore,
we show that p190RhoGAP and p120ctn associated predominantly on the plasma
membrane of cells overexpressing E-cadherin, and that E-cadherin-bound p120ctn
contributed to RhoA inactivation by favoring p190RhoGAP-RhoA association.
These results suggest that melanoma cells at advanced stages of the disease
could have reduced metastatic potency in response to chemotactic stimuli
compared with cells lacking E-cadherin, and the results indicate that
p190RhoGAP is a central molecule controlling melanoma cell invasion.Cadherins are a family of Ca2+-dependent adhesion molecules that
mediate cell-cell contacts and are expressed in most solid tissues providing a
tight control of morphogenesis
(1,
2). Classical cadherins, such
as epithelial (E) cadherin, are found in adherens junctions, forming core
protein complexes with β-catenin, α-catenin, and p120 catenin
(p120ctn). Both β-catenin and p120ctn directly interact with E-cadherin,
whereas α-catenin associates with the complex through its binding to
β-catenin, providing a link with the actin cytoskeleton
(1,
2). E-cadherin is frequently
lost or down-regulated in many human tumors, coincident with morphological
epithelial to mesenchymal transition and acquisition of invasiveness
(3-6).Although melanoma only accounts for 5% of skin cancers, when metastasis
starts, it is responsible for 80% of deaths from skin cancers
(7). Melanocytes express
E-cadherin
(8-10),
but melanoma cells at early radial growth phase show a large reduction in the
expression of this cadherin, and surprisingly, expression has been reported to
be partially recovered by vertical growth phase and metastatic melanoma cells
(9,
11,
12).Trafficking of cancer cells from primary tumor sites to intravasation into
blood circulation and later to extravasation to colonize distant organs
requires tightly regulated directional cues and cell migration and invasion
that are mediated by chemokines, growth factors, and adhesion molecules
(13). Solid tumor cells
express chemokine receptors that provide guidance of these cells to organs
where their chemokine ligands are expressed, constituting a homing model
resembling the one used by immune cells to exert their immune surveillance
functions (14). Most solid
cancer cells express CXCR4, a receptor for the chemokine CXCL12 (also called
SDF-1), which is expressed in lungs, bone marrow, and liver
(15). Expression of CXCR4 in
human melanoma has been detected in the vertical growth phase and on regional
lymph nodes, which correlated with poor prognosis and increased mortality
(16,
17). Previous in vivo
experiments have provided evidence supporting a crucial role for CXCR4 in the
metastasis of melanoma cells
(18).Rho GTPases control the dynamics of the actin cytoskeleton during cell
migration (19,
20). The activity of Rho
GTPases is tightly regulated by guanine-nucleotide exchange factors
(GEFs),4 which
stimulate exchange of bound GDP by GTP, and inhibited by GTPase-activating
proteins (GAPs), which promote GTP hydrolysis
(21,
22), whereas guanine
nucleotide dissociation inhibitors (GDIs) appear to mediate blocking of
spontaneous activation (23).
Therefore, cell migration is finely regulated by the balance between GEF, GAP,
and GDI activities on Rho GTPases. Involvement of Rho GTPases in cancer is
well documented (reviewed in Ref.
24), providing control of both
cell migration and growth. RhoA and RhoC are highly expressed in colon,
breast, and lung carcinoma
(25,
26), whereas overexpression of
RhoC in melanoma leads to enhancement of cell metastasis
(27). CXCL12 activates both
RhoA and Rac1 in melanoma cells, and both GTPases play key roles during
invasion toward this chemokine
(28,
29).Given the importance of the CXCL12-CXCR4 axis in melanoma cell invasion and
metastasis, in this study we have addressed the question of whether changes in
E-cadherin expression on melanoma cells might affect cell invasiveness. We
show here that overexpression of E-cadherin leads to impaired melanoma cell
invasion to CXCL12, and we provide mechanistic characterization accounting for
the decrease in invasion. 相似文献
11.
As obligate intracellular parasites, viruses exploit diverse cellular
signaling machineries, including the mitogen-activated protein-kinase pathway,
during their infections. We have demonstrated previously that the open reading
frame 45 (ORF45) of Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus interacts with p90
ribosomal S6 kinases (RSKs) and strongly stimulates their kinase activities
(Kuang, E., Tang, Q., Maul, G. G., and Zhu, F.
(2008) J. Virol. 82
,1838
-1850). Here, we define the
mechanism by which ORF45 activates RSKs. We demonstrated that binding of ORF45
to RSK increases the association of extracellular signal-regulated kinase
(ERK) with RSK, such that ORF45, RSK, and ERK formed high molecular mass
protein complexes. We further demonstrated that the complexes shielded active
pERK and pRSK from dephosphorylation. As a result, the complex-associated RSK
and ERK were activated and sustained at high levels. Finally, we provide
evidence that this mechanism contributes to the sustained activation of ERK
and RSK in Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus lytic replication.The extracellular signal-regulated kinase
(ERK)2
mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway has been implicated
in diverse cellular physiological processes including proliferation, survival,
growth, differentiation, and motility
(1-4)
and is also exploited by a variety of viruses such as Kaposi
sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV), human cytomegalovirus, human
immunodeficiency virus, respiratory syncytial virus, hepatitis B virus,
coxsackie, vaccinia, coronavirus, and influenza virus
(5-17).
The MAPK kinases relay the extracellular signaling through sequential
phosphorylation to an array of cytoplasmic and nuclear substrates to elicit
specific responses (1,
2,
18). Phosphorylation of MAPK
is reversible. The kinetics of deactivation or duration of signaling dictates
diverse biological outcomes
(19,
20). For example, sustained
but not transient activation of ERK signaling induces the differentiation of
PC12 cells into sympathetic-like neurons and transformation of NIH3T3 cells
(20-22).
During viral infection, a unique biphasic ERK activation has been observed for
some viruses (an early transient activation triggered by viral binding or
entry and a late sustained activation correlated with viral gene expression),
but the responsible viral factors and underlying mechanism for the sustained
ERK activation remain largely unknown
(5,
8,
13,
23).The p90 ribosomal S6 kinases (RSKs) are a family of serine/threonine
kinases that lie at the terminus of the ERK pathway
(1,
24-26).
In mammals, four isoforms are known, RSK1 to RSK4. Each one has two
catalytically functional kinase domains, the N-terminal kinase domain (NTKD)
and C-terminal kinase domain (CTKD) as well as a linker region between the
two. The NTKD is responsible for phosphorylation of exogenous substrates, and
the CTKD and linker region regulate RSK activation
(1,
24,
25). In quiescent cells ERK
binds to the docking site in the C terminus of RSK
(27-29).
Upon mitogen stimulation, ERK is activated by its upstream MAPK/ERK kinase
(MEK). The active ERK phosphorylates Thr-359/Ser-363 of RSK in the linker
region (amino acid numbers refer to human RSK1) and Thr-573 in the CTKD
activation loop. The activated CTKD then phosphorylates Ser-380 in the linker
region, creating a docking site for 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein
kinase-1. The 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1 phosphorylates
Ser-221 of RSK in the activation loop and activates the NTKD. The activated
NTKD autophosphorylates the serine residue near the ERK docking site, causing
a transient dissociation of active ERK from RSK
(25,
26,
28). The stimulation of
quiescent cells by a mitogen such as epidermal growth factor or a phorbol
ester such as 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) usually
results in a transient RSK activation that lasts less than 30 min. RSKs have
been implicated in regulating cell survival, growth, and proliferation.
Mutation or aberrant expression of RSK has been implicated in several human
diseases including Coffin-Lowry syndrome and prostate and breast cancers
(1,
24,
25,
30-32).KSHV is a human DNA tumor virus etiologically linked to Kaposi sarcoma,
primary effusion lymphoma, and a subset of multicentric Castleman disease
(33,
34). Infection and
reactivation of KSHV activate multiple MAPK pathways
(6,
12,
35). Noticeably, the ERK/RSK
activation is sustained late during KSHV primary infection and reactivation
from latency (5,
6,
12,
23), but the mechanism of the
sustained ERK/RSK activation is unclear. Recently, we demonstrated that ORF45,
an immediate early and also virion tegument protein of KSHV, interacts with
RSK1 and RSK2 and strongly stimulates their kinase activities
(23). We also demonstrated
that the activation of RSK plays an essential role in KSHV lytic replication
(23). In the present study we
determined the mechanism of ORF45-induced sustained ERK/RSK activation. We
found that ORF45 increases the association of RSK with ERK and protects them
from dephosphorylation, causing sustained activation of both ERK and RSK. 相似文献
12.
13.
14.
Benjamin E. L. Lauffer Stanford Chen Cristina Melero Tanja Kortemme Mark von Zastrow Gabriel A. Vargas 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(4):2448-2458
Many G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) recycle after agonist-induced
endocytosis by a sequence-dependent mechanism, which is distinct from default
membrane flow and remains poorly understood. Efficient recycling of the
β2-adrenergic receptor (β2AR) requires a C-terminal PDZ
(PSD-95/Discs Large/ZO-1) protein-binding determinant (PDZbd), an intact actin
cytoskeleton, and is regulated by the endosomal protein Hrs (hepatocyte growth
factor-regulated substrate). The PDZbd is thought to link receptors to actin
through a series of protein interaction modules present in NHERF/EBP50
(Na+/H+ exchanger 3 regulatory factor/ezrin-binding phosphoprotein
of 50 kDa) family and ERM (ezrin/radixin/moesin) family proteins. It is not
known, however, if such actin connectivity is sufficient to recapitulate the
natural features of sequence-dependent recycling. We addressed this question
using a receptor fusion approach based on the sufficiency of the PDZbd to
promote recycling when fused to a distinct GPCR, the δ-opioid receptor,
which normally recycles inefficiently in HEK293 cells. Modular domains
mediating actin connectivity promoted receptor recycling with similarly high
efficiency as the PDZbd itself, and recycling promoted by all of the domains
was actin-dependent. Regulation of receptor recycling by Hrs, however, was
conferred only by the PDZbd and not by downstream interaction modules. These
results suggest that actin connectivity is sufficient to mimic the core
recycling activity of a GPCR-linked PDZbd but not its cellular regulation.G protein-coupled receptors
(GPCRs)2 comprise the
largest family of transmembrane signaling receptors expressed in animals and
transduce a wide variety of physiological and pharmacological information.
While these receptors share a common 7-transmembrane-spanning topology,
structural differences between individual GPCR family members confer diverse
functional and regulatory properties
(1-4).
A fundamental mechanism of GPCR regulation involves agonist-induced
endocytosis of receptors via clathrin-coated pits
(4). Regulated endocytosis can
have multiple functional consequences, which are determined in part by the
specificity with which internalized receptors traffic via divergent downstream
membrane pathways
(5-7).Trafficking of internalized GPCRs to lysosomes, a major pathway traversed
by the δ-opioid receptor (δOR), contributes to proteolytic
down-regulation of receptor number and produces a prolonged attenuation of
subsequent cellular responsiveness to agonist
(8,
9). Trafficking of internalized
GPCRs via a rapid recycling pathway, a major route traversed by the
β2-adrenergic receptor (β2AR), restores the complement of functional
receptors present on the cell surface and promotes rapid recovery of cellular
signaling responsiveness (6,
10,
11). When co-expressed in the
same cells, the δOR and β2AR are efficiently sorted between these
divergent downstream membrane pathways, highlighting the occurrence of
specific molecular sorting of GPCRs after endocytosis
(12).Recycling of various integral membrane proteins can occur by default,
essentially by bulk membrane flow in the absence of lysosomal sorting
determinants (13). There is
increasing evidence that various GPCRs, such as the β2AR, require
distinct cytoplasmic determinants to recycle efficiently
(14). In addition to requiring
a cytoplasmic sorting determinant, sequence-dependent recycling of the
β2AR differs from default recycling in its dependence on an intact actin
cytoskeleton and its regulation by the conserved endosomal sorting protein Hrs
(hepatocyte growth factor receptor substrate)
(11,
14). Compared with the present
knowledge regarding protein complexes that mediate sorting of GPCRs to
lysosomes (15,
16), however, relatively
little is known about the biochemical basis of sequence-directed recycling or
its regulation.The β2AR-derived recycling sequence conforms to a canonical PDZ
(PSD-95/Discs Large/ZO-1) protein-binding determinant (henceforth called
PDZbd), and PDZ-mediated protein association(s) with this sequence appear to
be primarily responsible for its endocytic sorting activity
(17-20).
Fusion of this sequence to the cytoplasmic tail of the δOR effectively
re-routes endocytic trafficking of engineered receptors from lysosomal to
recycling pathways, establishing the sufficiency of the PDZbd to function as a
transplantable sorting determinant
(18). The β2AR-derived
PDZbd binds with relatively high specificity to the NHERF/EBP50 family of PDZ
proteins (21,
22). A well-established
biochemical function of NHERF/EBP50 family proteins is to associate integral
membrane proteins with actin-associated cytoskeletal elements. This is
achieved through a series of protein-interaction modules linking NHERF/EBP50
family proteins to ERM (ezrin-radixin-moesin) family proteins and, in turn, to
actin filaments
(23-26).
Such indirect actin connectivity is known to mediate other effects on plasma
membrane organization and function
(23), however, and NHERF/EBP50
family proteins can bind to additional proteins potentially important for
endocytic trafficking of receptors
(23,
25). Thus it remains unclear
if actin connectivity is itself sufficient to promote sequence-directed
recycling of GPCRs and, if so, if such connectivity recapitulates the normal
cellular regulation of sequence-dependent recycling. In the present study, we
took advantage of the modular nature of protein connectivity proposed to
mediate β2AR recycling
(24,
26), and extended the opioid
receptor fusion strategy used successfully for identifying diverse recycling
sequences in GPCRs
(27-29),
to address these fundamental questions.Here we show that the recycling activity of the β2AR-derived PDZbd can
be effectively bypassed by linking receptors to ERM family proteins in the
absence of the PDZbd itself. Further, we establish that the protein
connectivity network can be further simplified by fusing receptors to an
interaction module that binds directly to actin filaments. We found that
bypassing the PDZ-mediated interaction using either domain is sufficient to
mimic the ability of the PDZbd to promote efficient, actin-dependent recycling
of receptors. Hrs-dependent regulation, however, which is characteristic of
sequence-dependent recycling of wild-type receptors, was recapitulated only by
the fused PDZbd and not by the proposed downstream interaction modules. These
results support a relatively simple architecture of protein connectivity that
is sufficient to mimic the core recycling activity of the β2AR-derived
PDZbd, but not its characteristic cellular regulation. Given that an
increasing number of GPCRs have been shown to bind PDZ proteins that typically
link directly or indirectly to cytoskeletal elements
(17,
27,
30-32),
the present results also suggest that actin connectivity may represent a
common biochemical principle underlying sequence-dependent recycling of
various GPCRs. 相似文献
15.
Tatsuhiro Sato Akio Nakashima Lea Guo Fuyuhiko Tamanoi 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(19):12783-12791
Rheb G-protein plays critical roles in the TSC/Rheb/mTOR signaling pathway
by activating mTORC1. The activation of mTORC1 by Rheb can be faithfully
reproduced in vitro by using mTORC1 immunoprecipitated by the use of
anti-raptor antibody from mammalian cells starved for nutrients. The low
in vitro kinase activity against 4E-BP1 of this mTORC1 preparation is
dramatically increased by the addition of recombinant Rheb. On the other hand,
the addition of Rheb does not activate mTORC2 immunoprecipitated from
mammalian cells by the use of anti-rictor antibody. The activation of mTORC1
is specific to Rheb, because other G-proteins such as KRas, RalA/B, and Cdc42
did not activate mTORC1. Both Rheb1 and Rheb2 activate mTORC1. In addition,
the activation is dependent on the presence of bound GTP. We also find that
the effector domain of Rheb is required for the mTORC1 activation. FKBP38, a
recently proposed mediator of Rheb action, appears not to be involved in the
Rheb-dependent activation of mTORC1 in vitro, because the preparation
of mTORC1 that is devoid of FKBP38 is still activated by Rheb. The addition of
Rheb results in a significant increase of binding of the substrate protein
4E-BP1 to mTORC1. PRAS40, a TOR signaling (TOS) motif-containing protein that
competes with the binding of 4EBP1 to mTORC1, inhibits Rheb-induced activation
of mTORC1. A preparation of mTORC1 that is devoid of raptor is not activated
by Rheb. Rheb does not induce autophosphorylation of mTOR. These results
suggest that Rheb induces alteration in the binding of 4E-BP1 with mTORC1 to
regulate mTORC1 activation.Rheb defines a unique member of the Ras superfamily G-proteins
(1). We have shown that Rheb
proteins are conserved and are found from yeast to human
(2). Although yeast and fruit
fly have one Rheb, mouse and human have two Rheb proteins termed Rheb1 (or
simply Rheb) and Rheb2 (RhebL1)
(2). Structurally, these
proteins contain G1-G5 boxes, short stretches of amino acids that define the
function of the Ras superfamily G-proteins including guanine nucleotide
binding (1,
3,
4). Rheb proteins have a
conserved arginine at residue 15 that corresponds to residue 12 of Ras
(1). The effector domain
required for the binding with downstream effectors encompasses the G2 box and
its adjacent sequences (1,
5). Structural analysis by
x-ray crystallography further shows that the effector domain is exposed to
solvent, is located close to the phosphates of GTP especially at residues
35–38, and undergoes conformational change during GTP/GDP exchange
(6). In addition, all Rheb
proteins end with the CAAX (C is cysteine, A is an aliphatic amino
acid, and X is the C-terminal amino acid) motif that signals
farnesylation. In fact, we as well as others have shown that these proteins
are farnesylated
(7–9).Rheb plays critical roles in the TSC/Rheb/mTOR signaling, a signaling
pathway that plays central roles in regulating protein synthesis and growth in
response to nutrient, energy, and growth conditions
(10–14).
Rheb is down-regulated by a TSC1·TSC2 complex that acts as a
GTPase-activating protein for Rheb
(15–19).
Recent studies established that the GAP domain of TSC2 defines the functional
domain for the down-regulation of Rheb
(20). Mutations in the
Tsc1 or Tsc2 gene lead to tuberous sclerosis whose symptoms
include the appearance of benign tumors called hamartomas at different parts
of the body as well as neurological symptoms
(21,
22). Overexpression of Rheb
results in constitutive activation of mTOR even in the absence of nutrients
(15,
16). Two mTOR complexes,
mTORC1 and mTORC2, have been identified
(23,
24). Whereas mTORC1 is
involved in protein synthesis activation mediated by S6K and 4EBP1, mTORC2 is
involved in the phosphorylation of Akt in response to insulin. It has been
suggested that Rheb is involved in the activation of mTORC1 but not mTORC2
(25).Although Rheb is clearly involved in the activation of mTOR, the mechanism
of activation has not been established. We as well as others have suggested a
model that involves the interaction of Rheb with the TOR complex
(26–28).
Rheb activation of mTOR kinase activity using immunoprecipitated mTORC1 was
reported (29). Rheb has been
shown to interact with mTOR
(27,
30), and this may involve
direct interaction of Rheb with the kinase domain of mTOR
(27). However, this Rheb/mTOR
interaction is a weak interaction and is not dependent on the presence of GTP
bound to Rheb (27,
28). Recently, a different
model proposing that FKBP38 (FK506-binding protein
38) mediates the activation of
mTORC1 by Rheb was proposed
(31,
32). In this model, FKBP38
binds mTOR and negatively regulates mTOR activity, and this negative
regulation is blocked by the binding of Rheb to FKBP38. However, recent
reports dispute this idea
(33).To further characterize Rheb activation of mTOR, we have utilized an in
vitro system that reproduces activation of mTORC1 by the addition of
recombinant Rheb. We used mTORC1 immunoprecipitated from nutrient-starved
cells using anti-raptor antibody and have shown that its kinase activity
against 4E-BP1 is dramatically increased by the addition of recombinant Rheb.
Importantly, the activation of mTORC1 is specific to Rheb and is dependent on
the presence of bound GTP as well as an intact effector domain. FKBP38 is not
detected in our preparation and further investigation suggests that FKBP38 is
not an essential component for the activation of mTORC1 by Rheb. Our study
revealed that Rheb enhances the binding of a substrate 4E-BP1 with mTORC1
rather than increasing the kinase activity of mTOR. 相似文献
16.
ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters transduce the free energy of ATP
hydrolysis to power the mechanical work of substrate translocation across cell
membranes. MsbA is an ABC transporter implicated in trafficking lipid A across
the inner membrane of Escherichia coli. It has sequence similarity
and overlapping substrate specificity with multidrug ABC transporters that
export cytotoxic molecules in humans and prokaryotes. Despite rapid advances
in structure determination of ABC efflux transporters, little is known
regarding the location of substrate-binding sites in the transmembrane segment
and the translocation pathway across the membrane. In this study, we have
mapped residues proximal to the daunorubicin (DNR)-binding site in MsbA using
site-specific, ATP-dependent quenching of DNR intrinsic fluorescence by spin
labels. In the nucleotide-free MsbA intermediate, DNR-binding residues cluster
at the cytoplasmic end of helices 3 and 6 at a site accessible from the
membrane/water interface and extending into an aqueous chamber formed at the
interface between the two transmembrane domains. Binding of a nonhydrolyzable
ATP analog inverts the transporter to an outward-facing conformation and
relieves DNR quenching by spin labels suggesting DNR exclusion from proximity
to the spin labels. The simplest model consistent with our data has DNR
entering near an elbow helix parallel to the water/membrane interface,
partitioning into the open chamber, and then translocating toward the
periplasm upon ATP binding.ATP-binding cassette
(ABC)2 transporters
transduce the energy of ATP hydrolysis to power the movement of a wide range
of substrates across the cell membranes
(1,
2). They constitute the largest
family of prokaryotic transporters, import essential cell nutrients, flip
lipids, and export toxic molecules
(3). Forty eight human ABC
transporters have been identified, including ABCB1, or P-glycoprotein, which
is implicated in cross-resistance to drugs and cytotoxic molecules
(4,
5). Inherited mutations in
these proteins are linked to diseases such as cystic fibrosis, persistent
hypoglycemia of infancy, and immune deficiency
(6).The functional unit of an ABC transporter consists of four modules. Two
highly conserved ABCs or nucleotide-binding domains (NBDs) bind and hydrolyze
ATP to supply the active energy for transport
(7). ABCs drive the mechanical
work of proteins with diverse functions ranging from membrane transport to DNA
repair (3,
5). Substrate specificity is
determined by two transmembrane domains (TMDs) that also provide the
translocation pathway across the bilayer
(7). Bacterial ABC exporters
are expressed as monomers, each consisting of one NBD and one TMD, that
dimerize to form the active transporter
(3). The number of
transmembrane helices and their organization differ significantly between ABC
importers and exporters reflecting the divergent structural and chemical
nature of their substrates (1,
8,
9). Furthermore, ABC exporters
bind substrates directly from the cytoplasm or bilayer inner leaflet and
release them to the periplasm or bilayer outer leaflet
(10,
11). In contrast, bacterial
importers have their substrates delivered to the TMD by a dedicated high
affinity substrate-binding protein
(12).In Gram-negative bacteria, lipid A trafficking from its synthesis site on
the inner membrane to its final destination in the outer membrane requires the
ABC transporter MsbA (13).
Although MsbA has not been directly shown to transport lipid A, suppression of
MsbA activity leads to cytoplasmic accumulation of lipid A and inhibits
bacterial growth strongly suggesting a role in translocation
(14-16).
In addition to this role in lipid A transport, MsbA shares sequence similarity
with multidrug ABC transporters such as human ABCB1, LmrA of Lactococcus
lactis, and Sav1866 of Staphylococcus aureus
(16-19).
ABCB1, a prototype of the ABC family, is a plasma membrane protein whose
overexpression provides resistance to chemotherapeutic agents in cancer cells
(1). LmrA and MsbA have
overlapping substrate specificity with ABCB1 suggesting that both proteins can
function as drug exporters
(18,
20). Indeed, cells expressing
MsbA confer resistance to erythromycin and ethidium bromide
(21). MsbA can be photolabeled
with the ABCB1/LmrA substrate azidopine and can transport Hoechst 33342
() across membrane vesicles in an energy-dependent manner
( H3334221).The structural mechanics of ABC exporters was revealed from comparison of
the MsbA crystal structures in the apo- and nucleotide-bound states as well as
from analysis by spin labeling EPR spectroscopy in liposomes
(17,
19,
22,
23). The energy harnessed from
ATP binding and hydrolysis drives a cycle of NBD association and dissociation
that is transmitted to induce reorientation of the TMD from an inward- to
outward-facing conformation
(17,
19,
22). Large amplitude motion
closes the cytoplasmic end of a chamber found at the interface between the two
TMDs and opens it to the periplasm
(23). These rearrangements
lead to significant changes in chamber hydration, which may drive substrate
translocation (22).Substrate binding must precede energy input, otherwise the cycle is futile,
wasting the energy of ATP hydrolysis without substrate extrusion
(7). Consistent with this
model, ATP binding reduces ABCB1 substrate affinity, potentially through
binding site occlusion
(24-26).
Furthermore, the TMD substrate-binding event signals the NBD to stimulate ATP
hydrolysis increasing transport efficiency
(1,
27,
28). However, there is a
paucity of information regarding the location of substrate binding, the
transport pathway, and the structural basis of substrate recognition by ABC
exporters. In vitro studies of MsbA substrate specificity identify a
broad range of substrates that stimulate ATPase activity
(29). In addition to the
putative physiological substrates lipid A and lipopolysaccharide (LPS), the
ABCB1 substrates Ilmofosine, , and verapamil differentially enhance ATP
hydrolysis of MsbA ( H3334229,
30). Intrinsic MsbA tryptophan
(Trp) fluorescence quenching by these putative substrate molecules provides
further support of interaction
(29).Extensive biochemical analysis of ABCB1 and LmrA provides a general model
of substrate binding to ABC efflux exporters. This so-called
“hydrophobic cleaner model” describes substrates binding from the
inner leaflet of the bilayer and then translocating through the TMD
(10,
31,
32). These studies also
identified a large number of residues involved in substrate binding and
selectivity (33). When these
crucial residues are mapped onto the crystal structures of MsbA, a subset of
homologous residues clusters to helices 3 and 6 lining the putative substrate
pathway (34). Consistent with
a role in substrate binding and specificity, simultaneous replacement of two
serines (Ser-289 and Ser-290) in helix 6 of MsbA reduces binding and transport
of ethidium and taxol, although and erythromycin interactions remain
unaffected ( H3334234).The tendency of lipophilic substrates to partition into membranes confounds
direct analysis of substrate interactions with ABC exporters
(35,
36). Such partitioning may
promote dynamic collisions with exposed Trp residues and nonspecific
cross-linking in photo-affinity labeling experiments. In this study, we
utilize a site-specific quenching approach to identify residues in the
vicinity of the daunorubicin (DNR)-binding site
(37). Although the data on DNR
stimulation of ATP hydrolysis is inconclusive
(20,
29,
30), the quenching of MsbA Trp
fluorescence suggests a specific interaction. Spin labels were introduced
along transmembrane helices 3, 4, and 6 of MsbA to assess their ATP-dependent
quenching of DNR fluorescence. Residues that quench DNR cluster along the
cytoplasmic end of helices 3 and 6 consistent with specific binding of DNR.
Furthermore, many of these residues are not lipid-exposed but face the
putative substrate chamber formed between the two TMDs. These residues are
proximal to two Trps, which likely explains the previously reported quenching
(29). Our results suggest DNR
partitions to the membrane and then binds MsbA in a manner consistent with the
hydrophobic cleaner model. Interpretation in the context of the crystal
structures of MsbA identifies a putative translocation pathway through the
transmembrane segment. 相似文献
17.
18.
19.
Nodar Makharashvili Tian Mi Olga Koroleva Sergey Korolev 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(3):1425-1434
RecF pathway proteins play an important role in the restart of stalled
replication and DNA repair in prokaryotes. Following DNA damage, RecF, RecR,
and RecO initiate homologous recombination (HR) by loading of the RecA
recombinase on single-stranded (ss) DNA, protected by ssDNA-binding protein.
The specific role of RecF in this process is not well understood. Previous
studies have proposed that RecF directs the RecOR complex to boundaries of
damaged DNA regions by recognizing single-stranded/double-stranded (ss/ds) DNA
junctions. RecF belongs to ABC-type ATPases, which function through an
ATP-dependent dimerization. Here, we demonstrate that the RecF of
Deinococcus radiodurans interacts with DNA as an ATP-dependent dimer,
and that the DNA binding and ATPase activity of RecF depend on both the
structure of DNA substrate, and the presence of RecR. We found that RecR
interacts as a tetramer with the RecF dimer. RecR increases the RecF affinity
to dsDNA without stimulating ATP hydrolysis but destabilizes RecF binding to
ssDNA and dimerization, likely due to increasing the ATPase rate. The
DNA-dependent binding of RecR to the RecF-DNA complex occurs through specific
protein-protein interactions without significant contributions from RecR-DNA
interactions. Finally, RecF neither alone nor in complex with RecR
preferentially binds to the ss/dsDNA junction. Our data suggest that the
specificity of the RecFOR complex toward the boundaries of DNA damaged regions
may result from a network of protein-protein and DNA-protein interactions,
rather than a simple recognition of the ss/dsDNA junction by RecF.Homologous recombination
(HR)2 is one of the
primary mechanisms by which cells repair dsDNA breaks (DSBs) and ssDNA gaps
(SSGs), and is important for restart of stalled DNA replication
(1). HR is initiated when
RecA-like recombinases bind to ssDNA forming an extended nucleoprotein
filament, referred to as a presynaptic complex
(2). The potential for genetic
rearrangements dictates that HR initiation is tightly regulated at multiple
levels (1). During replication,
the ssDNA-binding protein (SSB) protects transiently unwound DNA chains,
preventing interactions with recombinases. Following DNA damage, recombination
mediator proteins (RMPs) initiate HR by facilitating the formation of the
recombinase filaments with ssDNA, while removing SSB
(3,
4). Mutations in human proteins
involved in HR initiation are linked to cancer predisposition, chromosome
instability, UV sensitivity, and premature aging diseases
(4–8).
To date, little is known about the mechanism by which RMPs regulate the
formation of the recombinase filaments on the SSB-protected ssDNA.In Escherichia coli, there are two major recombination pathways,
RecBCD and RecF (9,
10). A helicase/nuclease
RecBCD complex processes DSBs and recruits RecA on ssDNA in a
sequence-specific manner
(11–13).
The principle players in the RecF pathway are the RecF, RecO, and RecR
proteins, which form an epistatic group that is important for SSG repair, for
restart of stalled DNA replication, and under specific conditions, can also
process DSBs
(14–20).
Homologs of RecF, -O, and -R are present in the majority of known bacteria
(21), including
Deinococcus radiodurans, extremely radiation-resistant bacteria that
lacks the RecBCD pathway, yet is capable of repairing thousands of DSBs
(22,
23). In addition, the sequence
or functional homologs of RecF pathway proteins are involved in similar
pathways in eukaryotes that include among others WRN, BLM, RAD52, and BRCA2
proteins
(4–8).The involvement of all three RecF, -O, and -R proteins in HR initiation is
well documented by genetic and cellular approaches
(18,
24–30),
yet their biochemical functions in the initiation process remain unclear,
particularly with respect to RecF. RecO and RecR proteins are sufficient to
promote formation of the RecA filament on SSB-bound ssDNA in vitro
(27). The UV-sensitive
phenotype of recF mutants can be suppressed by RecOR overexpression,
suggesting that RecF may direct the RMP complex to DNA-damaged regions where
HR initiation is required
(31). In agreement with this
hypothesis, RecF dramatically increases the efficiency of the RecA loading at
ds/ssDNA junctions with a 3′ ssDNA extension under specific conditions
(32). RecF and RecR proteins
also prevent the RecA filaments from extending into dsDNA regions adjacent to
SSGs (33). These data suggest
that RecF may directly recognize an ss/dsDNA junction structure
(34). However, DNA binding
experiments have not provided clear evidence to support such a hypothesis
(11).The targeting promoted by RecF may also occur through more complex
processes. RecF shares a high structural similarity with the head domain of
Rad50, an ABC-type ATPase that recognizes DSBs and initiates repair in archaea
and eukaryotes (35). All known
ABC-type ATPases function as oligomeric complexes in which a sequence of
inter- and intra-molecular interactions is triggered by the ATP-dependent
dimerization and the dimer-dependent ATP hydrolysis
(36–39).
RecF is also an ATP-dependent DNA-binding protein and a weak DNA-dependent
ATPase (11,
40). RecF forms an
ATP-dependent dimer and all three conserved motifs (Walker A, Walker B, and
“signature”) of RecF are important for ATP-dependent dimerization,
ATP hydrolysis, and functional resistance to DNA damage
(35). Thus, RecF may function
in recombination initiation through a complex pathway of protein-protein and
DNA-protein interactions regulated by ATP-dependent RecF dimerization.In this report, we present a detailed characterization of the RecF
dimerization, and its role in the RecF interaction with various DNA
substrates, with RecR, and in ATP hydrolysis. Our data outline the following
key findings. First, RecF interacts with DNA as a dimer. Second, neither RecF
alone nor the RecFR complex preferentially binds the ss/dsDNA junction.
Finally, RecR changes the ATPase activity and the DNA binding of RecF by
destabilizing the interaction with ssDNA, and greatly enhancing the
interaction with dsDNA. Our results suggest that the specificity of RecF for
the boundaries of SSGs is likely to result from a sequence of protein-protein
interaction events rather than a simple RecF ss/dsDNA binding, underlining a
highly regulated mechanism of the HR initiation by the RecFOR proteins. 相似文献
20.
Michael A. Gitcho Jeffrey Strider Deborah Carter Lisa Taylor-Reinwald Mark S. Forman Alison M. Goate Nigel J. Cairns 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(18):12384-12398
Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) with inclusion body myopathy and
Paget disease of bone is a rare, autosomal dominant disorder caused by
mutations in the VCP (valosin-containing protein) gene. The disease
is characterized neuropathologically by frontal and temporal lobar atrophy,
neuron loss and gliosis, and ubiquitin-positive inclusions (FTLD-U), which are
distinct from those seen in other sporadic and familial FTLD-U entities. The
major component of the ubiquitinated inclusions of FTLD with VCP
mutation is TDP-43 (TAR DNA-binding protein of 43 kDa). TDP-43 proteinopathy
links sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, sporadic FTLD-U, and most
familial forms of FTLD-U. Understanding the relationship between individual
gene defects and pathologic TDP-43 will facilitate the characterization of the
mechanisms leading to neurodegeneration. Using cell culture models, we have
investigated the role of mutant VCP in intracellular trafficking,
proteasomal function, and cell death and demonstrate that mutations in the
VCP gene 1) alter localization of TDP-43 between the nucleus and
cytosol, 2) decrease proteasome activity, 3) induce endoplasmic reticulum
stress, 4) increase markers of apoptosis, and 5) impair cell viability. These
results suggest that VCP mutation-induced neurodegeneration is
mediated by several mechanisms.Frontotemporal lobar degeneration
(FTLD)2
accounts for 10% of all late onset dementias and is the third most frequent
neurodegenerative disease after Alzheimer disease and dementia with Lewy
bodies (1). FTLD with
ubiquitin-immunoreactive inclusions is genetically, clinically, and
neuropathologically heterogeneous
(2,
3). FTLD-U comprises several
distinct entities, including sporadic forms and familial cases caused by
mutations in the genes encoding VCP (valosin-containing protein), GRN
(progranulin), CHMP2B (charged multivesicular body protein 2B), TDP-43 (TAR
DNA-binding protein of 43 kDa) and an unknown gene linked to chromosome 9
(2,
3). Frontotemporal dementia
with inclusion body myopathy and Paget disease of bone is a rare, autosomal
dominant disorder caused by mutations in the VCP gene located on
chromosome 9p13-p12
(4-10)
(Fig. 1). This multisystem
disease is characterized by progressive muscle weakness and atrophy, increased
osteoclastic bone resorption, and early onset frontotemporal dementia, also
called FTLD (9,
11). Mutations in VCP
are also associated with dilatative cardiomyopathy with ubiquitin-positive
inclusions (12).
Neuropathologic features of FTLD with VCP mutation include frontal
and temporal lobar atrophy, neuron loss and gliosis, and ubiquitin-positive
inclusions (FTLD-U). The majority of aggregates are ubiquitin- and
TDP-43-positive neuronal intranuclear inclusions (NIIs); a smaller proportion
is made up of TDP-43-immunoreactive dystrophic neurites (DNs) and neuronal
cytoplasmic inclusions (NCIs). A small number of inclusions are
VCP-immunoreactive (5,
13). Pathologic TDP-43 in
inclusions links a spectrum of diseases in which TDP-43 pathology is a primary
feature, including FTLD-U, motor neuron disease, including amyotrophic lateral
sclerosis, FTLD with motor neuron disease, and inclusion body myopathy and
Paget disease of bone, as well as an expanding spectrum of other disorders in
which TDP-43 pathology is secondary
(14,
15).Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.Model of pathogenic mutations and domains in valosin-containing
protein. CDC48 (magenta), located within the N terminus (residues
22-108), binds the following cofactors: p47, gp78, and Npl4-Ufd1
(23-25,
28). There are two AAA-ATPase
domains (AAA; blue) at residues 240-283 and 516-569, which
are joined by two linker regions (L1 and L2;
red).TDP-43 proteinopathy in FTLD with VCP mutation has a biochemical
signature similar to that seen in other sporadic and familial cases of FTLD-U,
including sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, FTLD-motor neuron disease,
FTLD with progranulin (GRN) mutation, and FTLD linked to chromosome
9p (3,
16). TDP-43 proteinopathy in
these disorders is characterized by hyperphosphorylation of TDP-43,
ubiquitination, and cleavage to form C-terminal fragments detected only in
insoluble brain extracts from affected brain regions
(16). Identification of TDP-43
as the major component of the ubiquitin-immunoreactive inclusions of FTLD with
VCP mutation supports the hypothesis that VCP gene mutations
cause an alteration of VCP function, leading to TDP-43 proteinopathy.VCP/p97 (valosin-containing protein) is a member of the AAA (ATPase
associated with diverse cellular activities) superfamily. The N-terminal
domain of VCP has been shown to be involved in cofactor binding (CDC48 (cell
division cycle protein 48)) and two AAA-ATPase domains that form a hexameric
complex (Fig. 1)
(17). Recently, it has been
shown that the N-terminal domain of VCP binds phosphoinositides
(18,
19). AKT (activated
serine-threonine protein kinase) phosphorylates VCP and is required for
constitutive VCP function (20,
21). AKT is activated through
phospholipid binding and phosphorylation via the phosphoinositide 3-kinase
signaling pathway, which is involved in cell survival
(22). The lipid binding domain
may recruit VCP to the cell membrane where it is phosphorylated by AKT
(19).The diversity of VCP functions is modulated, in part, by a variety of
intracellular cofactors, including p47, gp78, and Npl4-Ufd1
(23). Cofactor p47 has been
shown to play a role in the maintenance and biogenesis of both the endoplasmic
reticulum (ER) and Golgi apparatus
(24). The structure of p47
contains a ubiquitin regulatory X domain that binds the N-terminus of VCP, and
together they act as a chaperone to deliver membrane fusion machinery to the
site of adjacent membranes
(25). The function of the
p47-VCP complex is dependent upon cell division cycle 2 (CDC2)
serine-threonine kinase phosphorylation of p47
(26,
27). Also, VCP has been found
to interact with the cytosolic tail of gp78, an ER membrane-spanning E3
ubiquitin ligase that exclusively binds VCP and enhances ER-associated
degradation (ERAD) (28). The
Npl4-Ufd1-VCP complex is involved in nuclear envelope assembly and targeting
of proteins through the ubiquitin-proteasome system
(29,
30). The cell survival
response of this complex has been found to be important in DNA damage repair
though activation by phosphorylation and its recruitment to double-stranded
breaks (20,
31). The Npl4-Ufd1-VCP
cytosolic complex is also recruited to the ER membrane, interacting with
Derlin 1, VCP-interacting membrane proteins (VIMP), and other complexes. At
the ER membrane, these misfolded proteins are targeted to the proteasome via
ERAD
(32-34).
VCP also targets IKKβ for ubiquitination to the ubiquitin-proteasome
system, implicating VCP in the cell survival pathway and neuroprotection
(21,
35-37).To investigate the mechanism of neurodegeneration caused by VCP
mutations, we first tested the hypothesis that VCP mutations decrease
cell viability in vitro using a neuroblastoma SHSY-5Y cell line and
then investigated cellular pathways that are known to lead to
neurodegeneration, including decrease in proteasome activity, caspase-mediated
degeneration, and a change in cellular localization of TDP-43. 相似文献