Proper Restoration of Excitation-Contraction Coupling in the Dihydropyridine Receptor ��1-null Zebrafish Relaxed Is an Exclusive Function of the ��1a Subunit

The paralyzed zebrafish strain relaxed carries a null mutation for the skeletal muscle dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) β_1a subunit. Lack of β_1a results in (i) reduced membrane expression of the pore forming DHPR α_1S subunit, (ii) elimination of α_1S charge movement, and (iii) impediment of arrangement of the DHPRs in groups of four (tetrads) opposing the ryanodine receptor (RyR1), a structural prerequisite for skeletal muscle-type excitation-contraction (EC) coupling. In this study we used relaxed larvae and isolated myotubes as expression systems to discriminate specific functions of β_1a from rather general functions of β isoforms. Zebrafish and mammalian β_1a subunits quantitatively restored α_1S triad targeting and charge movement as well as intracellular Ca²⁺ release, allowed arrangement of DHPRs in tetrads, and most strikingly recovered a fully motile phenotype in relaxed larvae. Interestingly, the cardiac/neuronal β_2a as the phylogenetically closest, and the ancestral housefly β_M as the most distant isoform to β_1a also completely recovered α_1S triad expression and charge movement. However, both revealed drastically impaired intracellular Ca²⁺ transients and very limited tetrad formation compared with β_1a. Consequently, larval motility was either only partially restored (β_2a-injected larvae) or not restored at all (β_M). Thus, our results indicate that triad expression and facilitation of 1,4-dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) charge movement are common features of all tested β subunits, whereas the efficient arrangement of DHPRs in tetrads and thus intact DHPR-RyR1 coupling is only promoted by the β_1a isoform. Consequently, we postulate a model that presents β_1a as an allosteric modifier of α_1S conformation enabling skeletal muscle-type EC coupling.Excitation-contraction (EC)³ coupling in skeletal muscle is critically dependent on the close interaction of two distinct Ca²⁺ channels. Membrane depolarizations of the myotube are sensed by the voltage-dependent 1,4-dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) in the sarcolemma, leading to a rearrangement of charged amino acids (charge movement) in the transmembrane segments S4 of the pore-forming DHPR α_1S subunit (1, 2). This conformational change induces via protein-protein interaction (3, 4) the opening of the sarcoplasmic type-1 ryanodine receptor (RyR1) without need of Ca²⁺ influx through the DHPR (5). The release of Ca²⁺ from the sarcoplasmic reticulum via RyR1 consequently induces muscle contraction. The protein-protein interaction mechanism between DHPR and RyR1 requires correct ultrastructural targeting of both channels. In Ca²⁺ release units (triads and peripheral couplings) of the skeletal muscle, groups of four DHPRs (tetrads) are coupled to every other RyR1 and hence are geometrically arranged following the RyR-specific orthogonal arrays (6).The skeletal muscle DHPR is a heteromultimeric protein complex, composed of the voltage-sensing and pore-forming α_1S subunit and auxiliary subunits β_1a, α₂δ-1, and γ₁ (7). While gene knock-out of the DHPR γ₁ subunit (8, 9) and small interfering RNA knockdown of the DHPR α₂δ-1 subunit (10-12) have indicated that neither subunit is essential for coupling of the DHPR with RyR1, the lack of the α_1S or of the intracellular β_1a subunit is incompatible with EC coupling and accordingly null model mice die perinatally due to asphyxia (13, 14). β subunits of voltage-gated Ca²⁺ channels were repeatedly shown to be responsible for the facilitation of α₁ membrane insertion and to be potent modulators of α₁ current kinetics and voltage dependence (15, 16). Whether the loss of EC coupling in β₁-null mice was caused by decreased DHPR membrane expression or by the lack of a putative specific contribution of the β subunit to the skeletal muscle EC coupling apparatus (17, 18) was not clearly resolved. Recently, other β-functions were identified in skeletal muscle using the β₁-null mutant zebrafish relaxed (19, 20). Like the β₁-knock-out mouse (14) zebrafish relaxed is characterized by complete paralysis of skeletal muscle (21, 22). While β₁-knock-out mouse pups die immediately after birth due to respiratory paralysis (14), larvae of relaxed are able to survive for several days because of oxygen and metabolite diffusion via the skin (23). Using highly differentiated myotubes that are easy to isolate from these larvae, the lack of EC coupling could be described by quantitative immunocytochemistry as a moderate ∼50% reduction of α_1S membrane expression although α_1S charge movement was nearly absent, and, most strikingly, as the complete lack of the arrangement of DHPRs in tetrads (19). Thus, in skeletal muscle the β subunit enables EC coupling by (i) enhancing α_1S membrane targeting, (ii) facilitating α_1S charge movement, and (iii) enabling the ultrastructural arrangement of DHPRs in tetrads.The question arises, which of these functions are specific for the skeletal muscle β_1a and which ones are rather general properties of Ca²⁺ channel β subunits. Previous reconstitution studies made in the β₁-null mouse system (24, 25) using different β subunit constructs (26) did not allow differentiation between β-induced enhancement of non-functional α_1S membrane expression and the facilitation of α_1S charge movement, due to the lack of information on α_1S triad expression levels. Furthermore, the β-induced arrangement of DHPRs in tetrads was not detected as no ultrastructural information was obtained.In the present study, we established zebrafish mutant relaxed as an expression system to test different β subunits for their ability to restore skeletal muscle EC coupling. Using isolated myotubes for in vitro experiments (19, 27) and complete larvae for in vivo expression studies (28-31) and freeze-fracture electron microscopy, a clear differentiation between the major functional roles of β subunits was feasible in the zebrafish system. The cloned zebrafish β_1a and a mammalian (rabbit) β_1a were shown to completely restore all parameters of EC coupling when expressed in relaxed myotubes and larvae. However, the phylogenetically closest β subunit to β_1a, the cardiac/neuronal isoform β_2a from rat, as well as the ancestral β_M isoform from the housefly (Musca domestica), could recover functional α_1S membrane insertion, but led to very restricted tetrad formation when compared with β_1a, and thus to impaired DHPR-RyR1 coupling. This impairment caused drastic changes in skeletal muscle function.The present study shows that the enhancement of functional α_1S membrane expression is a common function of all the tested β subunits, from β_1a to even the most distant β_M, whereas the effective formation of tetrads and thus proper skeletal muscle EC coupling is an exclusive function of the skeletal muscle β_1a subunit. In context with previous studies, our results suggest a model according to which β_1a acts as an allosteric modifier of α_1S conformation. Only in the presence of β_1a, the α_1S subunit is properly folded to allow RyR1 anchoring and thus skeletal muscle-type EC coupling.     

Control of Steroid 21-oic Acid Synthesis by Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor �� and Role of the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis

A previous study identified the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα) activation biomarkers 21-steroid carboxylic acids 11β-hydroxy-3,20-dioxopregn-4-en-21-oic acid (HDOPA) and 11β,20-dihydroxy-3-oxo-pregn-4-en-21-oic acid (DHOPA). In the present study, the molecular mechanism and the metabolic pathway of their production were determined. The PPARα-specific time-dependent increases in HDOPA and 20α-DHOPA paralleled the development of adrenal cortex hyperplasia, hypercortisolism, and spleen atrophy, which was attenuated in adrenalectomized mice. Wy-14,643 activation of PPARα induced hepatic FGF21, which caused increased neuropeptide Y and agouti-related protein mRNAs in the hypothalamus, stimulation of the agouti-related protein/neuropeptide Y neurons, and activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, resulting in increased adrenal cortex hyperplasia and corticosterone production, revealing a link between PPARα and the HPA axis in controlling energy homeostasis and immune regulation. Corticosterone was demonstrated as the precursor of 21-carboxylic acids both in vivo and in vitro. Under PPARα activation, the classic reductive metabolic pathway of corticosterone was suppressed, whereas an alternative oxidative pathway was uncovered that leads to the sequential oxidation on carbon 21 resulting in HDOPA. The latter was then reduced to the end product 20α-DHOPA. Hepatic cytochromes P450, aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH3A2), and 21-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (AKR1C18) were found to be involved in this pathway. Activation of PPARα resulted in the induction of Aldh3a2 and Akr1c18, both of which were confirmed as target genes through introduction of promoter luciferase reporter constructs into mouse livers in vivo. This study underscores the power of mass spectrometry-based metabolomics combined with genomic and physiologic analyses in identifying downstream metabolic biomarkers and the corresponding upstream molecular mechanisms.     

SUMOylation of Human Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor �� Inhibits Its Trans-activity through the Recruitment of the Nuclear Corepressor NCoR

The nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα) is a key regulator of genes implicated in lipid homeostasis and inflammation. PPARα trans-activity is enhanced by recruitment of coactivators such as SRC1 and CBP/p300 and is inhibited by binding of corepressors such as NCoR and SMRT. In addition to ligand binding, PPARα activity is regulated by post-translational modifications such as phosphorylation and ubiquitination. In this report, we demonstrate that hPPARα is SUMOylated by SUMO-1 on lysine 185 in the hinge region. The E2-conjugating enzyme Ubc9 and the SUMO E3- ligase PIASy are implicated in this process. In addition, ligand treatment decreases the SUMOylation rate of hPPARα. Finally, our results demonstrate that SUMO-1 modification of hPPARα down-regulates its trans-activity through the specific recruitment of corepressor NCoR but not SMRT leading to the differential expression of a subset of PPARα target genes. In conclusion, hPPARα SUMOylation on lysine 185 down-regulates its trans-activity through the selective recruitment of NCoR.     

In Vitro Mutational Analysis of the β2 Adrenergic Receptor,an In Vivo Surrogate Odorant Receptor

Many G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), such as odorant receptors (ORs), cannot be characterized in heterologous cells because of their difficulty in trafficking to the plasma membrane. In contrast, a surrogate OR, the GPCR mouse β2-adrenergic-receptor (mβ2AR), robustly traffics to the plasma membrane. We set out to characterize mβ2AR mutants in vitro for their eventual use in olfactory axon guidance studies. We performed an extensive mutational analysis of mβ2AR using a Green Fluorescent Protein-tagged mβ2AR (mβ2AR::GFP) to easily assess the extent of its plasma membrane localization. In order to characterize mutants for their ability to successfully transduce ligand-initiated signal cascades, we determined the half maximal effective concentrations (EC50) and maximal response to isoprenaline, a known mβ2AR agonist. Our analysis reveals that removal of amino terminal (Nt) N-glycosylation sites and the carboxy terminal (Ct) palmitoylation site of mβ2AR do not affect its plasma membrane localization. By contrast, when both the Nt and Ct of mβ2AR are replaced with those of M71 OR, plasma membrane trafficking is impaired. We further analyze three mβ2AR mutants (RDY, E268A, and C327R) used in olfactory axon guidance studies and are able to decorrelate their plasma membrane trafficking with their capacity to respond to isoprenaline. A deletion of the Ct prevents proper trafficking and abolishes activity, but plasma membrane trafficking can be selectively rescued by a Tyrosine to Alanine mutation in the highly conserved GPCR motif NPxxY. This new loss-of-function mutant argues for a model in which residues located at the end of transmembrane domain 7 can act as a retention signal when unmasked. Additionally, to our surprise, amongst our set of mutations only Ct mutations appear to lower mβ2AR EC50s revealing their critical role in G-protein coupling. We propose that an interaction between the Nt and Ct is necessary for proper folding and/or transport of GPCRs.     

Independent ��-Arrestin2 and Gq/Protein Kinase C�� Pathways for ERK Stimulated by Angiotensin Type 1A Receptors in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Converge on Transactivation of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor

Recent studies in receptor-transfected cell lines have demonstrated that extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) activation by angiotensin type 1A receptor and other G protein-coupled receptors can be mediated by both G protein-dependent and β-arrestin-dependent mechanisms. However, few studies have explored these mechanisms in primary cultured cells expressing endogenous levels of receptors. Accordingly, here we utilized the β-arrestin biased agonist for the angiotensin type 1A receptor, SII-angiotensin (SII), and RNA interference techniques to investigate angiotensin II (ANG)-activated β-arrestin-mediated mitogenic signaling pathways in rat vascular smooth muscle cells. Both ANG and SII induced DNA synthesis via the ERK activation cascade. Even though SII cannot induce calcium influx (G protein activation) after receptor stimulation, it does cause ERK activation, although less robustly than ANG. Activation by both ligands is diminished by depletion of β-arrestin2 by small interfering RNA, although the effect is more complete with SII. ERK activation at early time points but not later time points is strongly inhibited by those protein kinase C inhibitors that can block protein kinase Cζ. Moreover, ANG- and SII-mediated ERK activation require transactivation of the epidermal growth factor receptor via metalloprotease 2/9 and Src kinase. β-Arrestin2 facilitates ANG and SII stimulation of Src-mediated phosphorylation of Tyr-845 on the EGFR, a known site for Src phosphorylation. These studies delineate a convergent mechanism by which G protein-dependent and β-arrestin-dependent pathways can independently mediate ERK-dependent transactivation of the EGFR in vascular smooth muscle cells thus controlling cellular proliferative responses.G protein-coupled receptors, also known as seven transmembrane (7TM)² receptors, control virtually all known physiological processes in mammals (1). The various functions of these receptors are mediated and modulated by three families of proteins, which share the property that they interact virtually universally with the receptors in a strictly stimulus-dependent way (1). These three families of proteins are the heterotrimeric G proteins, the G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs), and the β-arrestins. Activation of the receptors stimulates classical G protein-dependent signaling, often involving regulation of levels of second messengers such as cAMP and diacyglycerol. However, as has been known for many years, interaction of activated receptors with GRKs leading to their phosphorylation, and subsequent interaction with β-arrestins leads to desensitization of G protein signaling.In recent years, however, it has become increasingly clear that the β-arrestin-GRK system is in fact bifunctional (2). Thus, even as it desensitizes G protein signaling by the receptors, it also serves as a signal transduction system in its own right, activating a growing list of signaling pathways. These positive signaling functions are often mediated by the ability of β-arrestin to serve as an adaptor or scaffold molecule, bringing elements of diverse signaling pathways into proximity with one another and the receptors and thereby facilitating their activation. This new paradigm for understanding the previously unrecognized signaling properties of the β-arrestin-GRK system has been explored in a wide variety of transfected cultured cell systems.However, to date, relatively little investigation of these novel signaling pathways has been carried out in primary cell culture systems expressing endogenous levels of 7TM receptors. In seeking such a system in which to characterize and compare β-arrestin and G protein-mediated signaling pathways from a typical 7TM receptor, our attention was drawn to cultured rat vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs). Several features of rat VSMCs suggest this to be a relevant system for these purposes. Rat VSMCs express a variety of physiologically important 7TM receptors including the angiotensin II type 1A receptor (AT1R) (3). This receptor has been the focus of extensive study in transfected cell systems with respect to its β-arrestin-mediated signaling to a variety of pathways, most particularly extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK). Moreover, the AT1R mediates the physiologically important effects of angiotensin II (ANG) on vascular tone as well as on proliferation and chemotaxis (4, 5). Pathophysiologically, ANG stimulation of this receptor has been implicated in VSMC proliferation and chemotaxis, which are thought to play an important role in such important disease processes as atherosclerosis and restenosis after angioplasty (6, 7). Moreover, a ligand has been characterized [Sar¹,Ile⁴,Ile⁸](SII)-angiotensin (SII), a triply mutated angiotensin octapeptide that, in transfected cell systems, acts as a specific agonist for β-arrestin-mediated signaling, although not activating G protein-mediated signaling (8).Accordingly, in the studies described here, we set out to investigate the characteristics of activation of ERK in rat VSMCs that might be mediated through G protein as well as β-arrestin signaling. The results not only demonstrate the importance of β-arrestin-mediated signaling in ERK-mediated proliferative responses of these cells, but also shed new light on the molecular mechanisms and interrelationships between the β-arrestin and classical G protein-mediated activation of these pathways.     

Coordinate Functional Regulation between Microsomal Prostaglandin E Synthase-1 (mPGES-1) and Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor γ (PPARγ) in the Conversion of White-to-brown Adipocytes

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) is a ligand-activated nuclear receptor and a master regulator of adipogenesis. Microsomal prostaglandin E (PGE) synthase-1 (mPGES-1) is an inducible enzyme that couples with cyclooxygenase-2 for the biosynthesis of PGE₂. In this study we demonstrate the existence of a coordinate functional interaction between PPARγ and mPGES-1 in controlling the process of pre-adipocyte differentiation in white adipose tissue (WAT). Adipocyte-specific PPARγ knock-out mice carrying an aP2 promoter-driven Cre recombinase transgene showed a blunted response to the adipogenic effects of a high fat diet. Pre-adipocytes from these knock-out mice showed loss of PPARγ and were resistant to rosiglitazone-induced WAT differentiation. In parallel, WAT from these mice showed increased expression of uncoupling protein 1, a mitochondrial enzyme that dissipates chemical energy as heat. Adipose tissue from mice lacking PPARγ also showed mPGES-1 up-regulation and increased PGE₂ levels. In turn, PGE₂ suppressed PPARγ expression and blocked rosiglitazone-induced pre-adipocyte differentiation toward white adipocytes while directly elevating uncoupling protein 1 expression and pre-adipocyte differentiation into mature beige/brite adipocytes. Consistently, pharmacological mPGES-1 inhibition directed pre-adipocyte differentiation toward white adipocytes while suppressing differentiation into beige/brite adipocytes. This browning effect was reproduced in knockdown experiments using a siRNA directed against mPGES-1. The effects of PGE₂ on pre-adipocyte differentiation were not seen in mice lacking PPARγ in adipose tissue and were not mirrored by other eicosanoids (i.e. leukotriene B₄). Taken together, these findings identify PGE₂ as a key regulator of white-to-brown adipogenesis and suggest the existence of a coordinate regulation of adipogenesis between PPARγ and mPGES-1.     

Aquaporin-2 in the ��-omics�� Era

Vasopressin controls renal water excretion largely through actions to regulate the water channel aquaporin-2 in collecting duct principal cells. Our knowledge of the mechanisms involved has increased markedly in recent years with the advent of methods for large-scale systems-level profiling such as protein mass spectrometry, yeast two-hybrid analysis, and oligonucleotide microarrays. Here we review this progress.Regulation of water excretion by the kidney is one of the most visible aspects of everyday physiology. An outdoor tennis game on a hot summer day can result in substantial water losses by sweating, and the kidneys respond by reducing water excretion. In contrast, excessive intake of water, a frequent occurrence in everyday life, results in excretion of copious amounts of clear urine. These responses serve to exact tight control on the tonicity of body fluids, maintaining serum osmolality in the range of 290–294 mosmol/kg of H₂O through the regulated return of water from the pro-urine in the renal collecting ducts to the bloodstream.The importance of this process is highlighted when the regulation fails. For example, polyuria (rapid uncontrolled excretion of water) is a sometimes devastating consequence of lithium therapy for bipolar disorder. On the other side of the coin are water balance disorders that result from excessive renal water retention causing systemic hypo-osmolality or hyponatremia. Hyponatremia due to excessive water retention can be seen with severe congestive heart failure, hepatic cirrhosis, and the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis.The chief regulator of water excretion is the peptide hormone AVP,² whereas the chief molecular target for regulation is the water channel AQP2. In this minireview, we describe new progress in the understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in regulation of AQP2 by AVP in collecting duct cells, with emphasis on new information derived from “systems-level” approaches involving large-scale profiling and screening techniques such as oligonucleotide arrays, protein mass spectrometry, and yeast two-hybrid analysis. Most of the progress with these techniques is in the identification of individual molecules involved in AVP signaling and binding interactions with AQP2. Additional related issues are addressed in several recent reviews (1–4).