阴山荠属,泡果荠属,棒毛荠属和岩荠属的扫描电镜观察

以阴山荠属、泡果荠属、棒毛荠属和岩荠属的18种植物取用实验材料,对果实外表皮、种子外种皮、毛和花粉粒等特征鉴别器官进行扫描电镜观察,提供36张照片资料,并以检索性状比较属间特征,证明该4属作为各自独立的属是恰当的。     

十字花科一新属——泡果荠属

岩荠属泡果荠组植物(Cochlearia L.Sect.Hilliella O.E.Schulz)不仅在体态上而且在其它一系列特征特别是具泡状突起的果实特征上极不同于狭义的岩荠属(Cohc-learia L.s.str.),松蓝叶岩荠属[Glaucocochlearia(O.E.Schulz)Pobed.],以及拟常绿岩荠属[Pseudosempervium(Boiss)Grossh.]。这些特征看来可以作为建立一新属的根据,因此将其提升为一独立的属并把这一组的8个种组合到新属中去。     

泡果荠属和阴山荠属（十字花科）的分属界限及两属的分类校订

泡果荠属Hilliella和阴山荠属Yinshania是十字花科中国特有的两小群植物,但是,它们的分属界定却一直颇有争议。本文结合前人的研究结果重新对这两群植物做了研究,从而进一步确认这两群植物应该界定为两个属,即泡果荠属和阴山荠属。文中比较了两属间重要的性状特征,并指出它们的主要区别在于:泡果荠属果实无假隔膜,种子较大,表面具小瘤状突起,染色体倍性为六倍体（2n=6x=42）;而阴山荠属果实有假隔膜,种子较小,表面具网纹,染色体倍性为二倍体（2n=2x=12）。两属其他方面如叶形态、叶表皮结构、被毛类型     

十字花科四属植物叶片脉序的比较研究

对十字花科有争议的岩荠属Cochlearia,泡果荠属Hilliella,阴山荠属Yinshania,棒毛荠属Cochleariella植物的叶片脉序进行了研究。结果表明：岩荠属为环结曲行羽状脉,泡果荠属为直行羽状脉,阴山荠属为半直行羽状脉,棒毛荠属种的叶脉与浙江泡果荠相似。前3属植物在网眼的大小,叶缘末级脉和叶先端的形态上也存在着差异。据此作者认为岩荠属,泡果荠属和阴山荠属这3属植物分开是合理的,但棒毛荠属的分类地位值得进一步研究。还得出这几个属的叶脉演化关系是;基出完全掌状脉→环结曲行羽状脉→直行羽状脉。     

福建石荠Ning属植物花粉和果皮微形态特征

运用立体显微镜和扫描电子显微镜对产子福建省的石荠Ｎｉｎｇ属３种药用植物的花粉和果皮的微形态特征进行系统观察。观察结果表明,３种植物花粉微形态特征比较相似;果皮微形态存在较明显的种间差异,且性状较稳定。石荠宁属果实表皮微形态特征是该属分类与研究中不同忽视的性状。     

阴山荠属和泡果荠属的数量分类研究

阴山荠属和泡果荠属隶于十字花科,两属有一些共同特征,也有一系列性状差异,数量分类结果支持两属处理为各自独立的属。本文同时对属下类群和一些种间关系进行了讨论。     

阴山荠属一种兼论该属的演化和地理起源问题

本文描述了阴山荠属一新种－鄂西阴山荠Ｙｉｎｓｈａｎｉａ ｅｘｉｅｎｓｉｓ Ｙ．Ｈ．Ｚｈａｎｇ。新种隶阳山荠系,但形态特征介于阴山荠系的察隅阴山荠和密毛系的叉毛阴山荠之间,分布在鄂西一带。阴山荠属属下系统有２组２系,在研究了本属主要性状特征的演化方向后,本文认为阴山荠组是较原始的一群,小果组是较进化的一群。四川西部及其邻近地区是本属的近代分布区中心或分化中心,本属也可能是从该地区分化起源的。     

阴山荠属一新种兼论该属的演化和地理起源问题

本文描述了阴山荠屑一新种——鄂西阴山荠Yinshania exiensis Y.H.Zhang。新种隶阴山荠系,但形态特征介于阴山荠系的察隅阴山荠和密毛系的叉毛阴山荠之间,分布在鄂西一带。阴山荠属属下系统有2组2系,在研究了本属主要性状特征的演化方向后,本文认为阴山荠组是较原始的一群,小果组是较进化的一群。四川西部及其邻近地区是本属的近代分布区中心或分化中心,本属也可能是从该地区分化起源的。     

阴山荠属和泡果荠属植物染色体数目及过氧化物酶同工酶的比较

阴山荠属和泡果荠属受试种类的染色体数目是：柔毛阴山荠（Ｙ．ｈｅｎｒｙｉ（Ｏｌｉｖ．）Ｙ．Ｈ．Ｚｈａｎｇ）２ｎ＝１２,叉毛阴山荠（Ｙ．ｆｕｒｃａｔｏｐｉｌｏｓａ（Ｋｕａｎ）Ｙ．Ｈ．Ｚｈａｎｇ）２ｎ＝１２,双牌泡果荠（Ｈ．ｓｈｕａｎｇｐａｉｅｎｓｉｓＺ．Ｙ．Ｌｉ）２ｎ＝４４,黟县泡果齐（Ｈ．ｙｉｃｉａｎｅｎｓｉｓＹ．Ｈ．Ｚｈａｎｇ）２ｎ＝４２,双牌泡果（Ｈ．ｐａｒｄｏｘａ（Ｈａｎｃｅ）Ｙ．Ｈ．Ｚｈａｎ     

阴山荠属的研究

本文为阴山荠属和泡果荠属的分类研究提供了染色体数目试验结果。受试种类按染色体数目的分异形成两大类群,与按形态地理分类法得出的结果一致。阴山荠属(Yinshania):柔毛阴山荠Y.henryi,2n=12;叉毛阴山荠Y.fur-catopilosa,2n=12;乾宁阴山荠Y.qianningensis,2n=12;泡果荠属(Hiliela):昌化泡果荠H.changhuaensis.2n=42,奇异泡果荠H.paradoxa,2n=42;双牌泡果荠H.shuangpaiensis,2n=44;弯缺泡果荠H.sinuata,2n=44;黟县泡果荠H.yixianensis,2n=42。染色体数目结合形态学和地理分布研究,支持两属作为各自独立的属存在。本属是中国特有分布属,形态演化研究表明,本属阴山荠组是较原始的类群,小果组是较进化的类群。文中讨论了属中各种的分布规律和全属的分布特点,认为川西及其邻近地区是本属多样化中心和近代分布区中心,本属可能是从该地区,并随着新生代第三纪喜马拉雅造山运动和青藏高原的崛起,以及第四纪冰期、间冰期的迭次变化产生的全球性气候波动而分化迁移。本属基本上属亚热带、暖温带的半湿润半干旱生态类型。根据本属重要器官较稳定的特点,以及地区性特有成分较高的特点,认为本属是较古老的中国特有成分     

Delimitation and revision of Hilliella and Yinshania（Brassicaceae）

Taxonomic characters for delimitation of Hilliella and Yinshania are discussed. More attention in this study is paid to morphological delimitation of these two genera. The results of the study show that these two genera can be easily separated by two prim     

On the Identity of Yinshania albiflora

The author examined the type of Cochlearia acutangula O.E.Schulz, G. Giraldi 2423, and found that Yinshania albiflora is conspecific with the former. Therefore the reduction of Yinshania albiflora(=Yinshania acutangula var. albiflo-ra) to Yinshania acutangula as a synonym is made.     

A Revision of Genus Yinshania (Cruciferae)

The genus Yinshania was established by Ma Yu-chuan and Zhao Yi-zhi in 1979, when only one species, Y. albiflora Ma et Y. Z. Zhao, was discribed from Nei Monggol. In the present paper the genus Yinshania is revised and four new species, two new varieties and four new combinetions are reported. There are so far eight species and two varieties in total in this genus. Important morphological characters of the genus are analysed, which shows that the lateral nectariferous glands positioned at lateral base of the brevistamens are triangularovoid; there are dense minute pustules on the surface of valves, which is easily neglected because the pustules disappear or shrinked when dry; simple or furcate hairs are present in the most species, seldom absent; the shape of pollen grains is relatively steady, elliptic or long-elliptic, with the polar view trifidcircular, the equatorial view elliptic or long elliptic, the aperture 3-colpate, exine reticular. The type of genus Yinshania is changed. Cochlearia acutangula O. E. Schulz was published in 1929, but Y. albiflora Ma et Y. Z. Zhao in 1979. They are the same species and a new combinetion, Y. acutangula (O. E. Schulz) Y. H. Zhang, is made. Thus, the type of genus Yinshania should be changed to Y. acutangula (O. E. Schulz) Y. H. Zhang. Besides, He Ye-qi 6121 (paratype, PE), which is different from Y. acutangula var. albiflora, is separated from it and transferred the typical variety, Y. acutangula. According to the characters of fruit shape the genus Yinshania is divided into two sections, namely, Sect. Microcarpa and Sect. Yinshania, and then Sect. Yinshania is subdivided into two series. Sect. 1. Microcarpa. Silicles widely ovoid or subglobose, 1-2.2 mm long, 0.8-2.2 mm wide, the ratio of length and width about 1.1. Sect. 2. Yinshania. Silicles oblong, oblong-ovoid or long-lanceolate, ellipsoidal, 1.5-4.5 mm long, 0.3-1.5 mm wide, the ratio of length and width about 2.5-3.3. Ser. 1. Henryanae. Raches flexuose; plants densely hairy; leaves 3-5-foliolate, seldom pinnatipartite or pinnatisect. Ser. 2. Yinshania. Raches non flexuose; plants sparsely hairy; leaves pinnatisect or pinnatipartite. The genus Yinshania is a genus endemic to China, with their range from eastern Xizang to western Hubei from northern Guizhou to central Nei Monggol. The taxa are mostly of a small area. Sect. Microcarpa is concentrated in Sichuan and southern Gansu; Sect. Yinshania is spread from Xizang and Sichuan, nouthwards to Gansu, Ningxia, Shanxi, Hebei and Nei Monggol (Ser. Yinshania); and from Sichuan south-eastwards to Guizhou and Hebei (Ser. Henryanae). There are five species in Sichuan. The present paper conjectures that the distribution centre of the genus is in the Hengduan Mountains and its adjacent areas.     

安徽植物补遗（一）

报道《安徽植物志》未记载的１８种地理分布新记录植物,分隶于１５科,１８属,全部标本均存于安徽师范大学生物系植物标本室。     

On the Type of the Genus Yinshania (Cruciferae)

When the genus Yinshania Ma et Y. Z. Zhao was published, it had only a single species, Y. albiflora Ma et Y. Z. Zhao which was indicated as the type of the genus (Acta Phytotax. Sin. 1979). Y. Z. Zhao 155. was indicated as the type specimen of Y. albiflora. It is adequate to cite Y. albiflora Ma et Y. Z. Zhao as the type of genus Yinshania Ma et Y. Z. Zhao. In a revision (Acta Phytotax. Sin. 25(3): 204-219, 1987) Y. H. Zhang made a combintion, Yinshania acutangula (O. E. Schulz) Y. H. Zhang (=Cochlearia acutangula O. E. Schulz) and reduced Yinshania albiflora Ma et Y. Z. Zhao as a variety of Y. acutangula,i. e. Y. acutangula var. albiflora (Ma et Y. Z. Zhao) Y. H. Zhang. She is uncorrect, however, when she cited Y. acutangula (O. E. Schulz) Y. H . Zhang as the type of the genus Yinshania Ma et Y. Z. Zhao. It should be cited as follows: Yinshania Ma et Y. Z. Zhao Typus generis: Yinshania albiflora Ma et Y. Z. Zhao (=Yinshania acutangula(O. E. Schulz) Y. H. Zhang var. albiflora (Ma et Y. Z. Zhao) Y. H. Zhang)