Expression of MUL, a gene encoding a novel RBCC family ring-finger protein, in human and mouse embryogenesis

In mammals, the SWI/SNF complex is involved in chromatin remodelling in a wide range of cellular events for which regulatory factors require access to DNA. In the present study, we analyzed in early postimplantation mouse embryos the expression pattern of BRM (SNF2alpha) and BRG1 (SNF2beta), which are both ATPase subunits of this complex. Contrarily to the previous studies conducted in adult mice, showing the ubiquitous and overlapping expressions of BRM and BRG1, we show that BRM expression is restricted to mesodermal tissues involved in early vasculogenesis and heart morphogenesis.     

Purification and biochemical heterogeneity of the mammalian SWI-SNF complex.

We have purified distinct complexes of nine to 12 proteins [referred to as BRG1-associated factors (BAFs)] from several mammalian cell lines using an antibody to the SWI2-SNF2 homolog BRG1. Microsequencing revealed that the 47 kDa BAF is identical to INI1. Previously INI1 has been shown to interact with and activate human immunodeficiency virus integrase and to be homologous to the yeast SNF5 gene. A group of BAF47-associated proteins were affinity purified with antibodies against INI1/BAF47 and were found to be identical to those co-purified with BRG1, strongly indicating that this group of proteins associates tightly and is likely to be the mammalian equivalent of the yeast SWI-SNF complex. Complexes containing BRG1 can disrupt nucleosomes and facilitate the binding of GAL4-VP16 to a nucleosomal template similar to the yeast SWI-SNF complex. Purification of the complex from several cell lines demonstrates that it is heterogeneous with respect to subunit composition. The two SWI-SNF2 homologs, BRG1 and hbrm, were found in separate complexes. Certain cell lines completely lack BRG1 and hbrm, indicating that they are not essential for cell viability and that the mammalian SWI-SNF complex may be tailored to the needs of a differentiated cell type.     

SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling enzyme ATPases promote cell proliferation in normal mammary epithelial cells

The ATPase subunits of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling enzymes, Brahma (BRM) and Brahma‐related gene 1 (BRG1), can induce cell cycle arrest in BRM and BRG1 deficient tumor cell lines, and mice heterozygous for Brg1 are pre‐disposed to breast tumors, implicating loss of BRG1 as a mechanism for unregulated cell proliferation. To test the hypothesis that loss of BRG1 can contribute to breast cancer, we utilized RNA interference to reduce the amounts of BRM or BRG1 protein in the nonmalignant mammary epithelial cell line, MCF‐10A. When grown in reconstituted basement membrane (rBM), these cells develop into acini that resemble the lobes of normal breast tissue. Contrary to expectations, knockdown of either BRM or BRG1 resulted in an inhibition of cell proliferation in monolayer cultures. This inhibition was strikingly enhanced in three‐dimensional rBM culture, although some BRM‐depleted cells were later able to resume proliferation. Cells did not arrest in any specific stage of the cell cycle; instead, the cell cycle length increased by approximately 50%. Thus, SWI/SNF ATPases promote cell cycle progression in nonmalignant mammary epithelial cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 223:667–678, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

MyoD can induce cell cycle arrest but not muscle differentiation in the presence of dominant negative SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling enzymes

Cell cycle arrest is critical for muscle differentiation, and the two processes are closely coordinated but temporally separable. SWI/SNF complexes are ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling enzymes that have been shown to be required for muscle differentiation in cell culture and have also been reported to be required for Rb-mediated cell cycle arrest. We therefore looked more closely at how SWI/SNF enzymes affect the events that occur during MyoD-induced myogenesis, namely, cell cycle regulation and muscle-specific gene expression, in cells that inducibly express dominant negative versions of Brahma (BRM) and Brahma-related gene 1 (BRG1), the ATPase subunits of two distinct SWI/SNF complexes. Although dominant negative BRM and BRG1 inhibited expression of every muscle-specific regulator and structural gene assayed, there was no effect on MyoD-induced activation of cell cycle regulatory proteins, and thus, cells arrested normally. In particular, in the presence or absence of dominant negative BRM or BRG1, MyoD was able to activate expression of p21, cyclin D3, and Rb, all of which are critical for cell cycle withdrawal in the G1/G0 phase of the cell cycle. These findings suggest that at least one basis for the distinct mechanisms that regulate cessation of cell proliferation and muscle-specific gene expression during muscle differentiation is that SWI/SNF-mediated chromatin-remodeling enzymes are required only for the latter.     

Residual Complexes Containing SMARCA2 (BRM) Underlie the Oncogenic Drive of SMARCA4 (BRG1) Mutation

Collectively, genes encoding subunits of the SWI/SNF (BAF) chromatin remodeling complex are mutated in 20% of all human cancers, with the SMARCA4 (BRG1) subunit being one of the most frequently mutated. The SWI/SNF complex modulates chromatin remodeling through the activity of two mutually exclusive catalytic subunits, SMARCA4 and SMARCA2 (BRM). Here, we show that a SMARCA2-containing residual SWI/SNF complex underlies the oncogenic activity of SMARCA4 mutant cancers. We demonstrate that a residual SWI/SNF complex exists in SMARCA4 mutant cell lines and plays essential roles in cellular proliferation. Further, using data from loss-of-function screening of 165 cancer cell lines, we identify SMARCA2 as an essential gene in SMARCA4 mutant cancer cell lines. Mechanistically, we reveal that Smarca4 inactivation leads to greater incorporation of the nonessential SMARCA2 subunit into the SWI/SNF complex. Collectively, these results reveal a role for SMARCA2 in oncogenesis caused by SMARCA4 loss and identify the ATPase and bromodomain-containing SMARCA2 as a potential therapeutic target in these cancers.     

Involvement of the chromatin-remodeling factor BRG1/SMARCA4 in human cancer

The SWI/SNF complex is a chromatin-remodeling complex that uses the energy of ATP hydrolysis to modify chromatin structure in order to regulate gene expression. The SWI/SNF complex is evolutionarily conserved in all eukaryotes and is comprised of a catalytic subunit, either of BRG1 (also known as SMARCA4) or of BRM (also known as SMARCA2), and a variety of associated proteins that can modulate the recruitment of the complex and its activity. Key observations link the SWI/SNF complex with cancer. First, two of its subunits (SNF5 and BRG1) bear cancer-inactivating mutations and thus are bona fide tumor suppressors. The SNF5 gene is biallelically inactivated in malignant rhabdoid tumors (MRTs) whereas BRG1 is mutated in cancer cell lines of several types, such as those of the breast, prostate, lung, pancreas and colon. Second, mice heterozygous for mutations at Snf5 and Brg1 are cancer-prone, and, third, BRG1 binds or is related to important tumor-suppressor proteins. The present review focuses on the biological function and genetics of BRG1, particularly with respect to its role as a tumor suppressor.     

Next-generation bromodomain inhibitors of the SWI/SNF complex enhance DNA damage and cell death in glioblastoma

Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive brain cancer with a poor prognosis. While surgical resection is the primary treatment, adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy and radiotherapy only provide slight improvement in disease course and outcome. Unfortunately, most treated patients experience recurrence of highly aggressive, therapy-resistant tumours and eventually succumb to the disease. To increase chemosensitivity and overcome therapy resistance, we have modified the chemical structure of the PFI-3 bromodomain inhibitor of the BRG1 and BRM catalytic subunits of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodelling complex. Our modifications resulted in compounds that sensitized GBM to the DNA alkylating agent TMZ and the radiomimetic bleomycin. We screened these chemical analogues using a cell death ELISA with GBM cell lines and a cellular thermal shift assay using epitope tagged BRG1 or BRM bromodomains expressed in GBM cells. An active analogue, IV-129, was then identified and further modified, resulting in new generation of bromodomain inhibitors with distinct properties. IV-255 and IV-275 had higher bioactivity than IV-129, with IV-255 selectively binding to the bromodomain of BRG1 and not BRM, while IV-275 bound well to both BRG1 and BRM bromodomains. In contrast, IV-191 did not bind to either bromodomain or alter GBM chemosensitivity. Importantly, both IV-255 and IV-275 markedly increased the extent of DNA damage induced by TMZ and bleomycin as determined by nuclear γH2AX staining. Our results demonstrate that these next-generation inhibitors selectively bind to the bromodomains of catalytic subunits of the SWI/SNF complex and sensitize GBM to the anticancer effects of TMZ and bleomycin. This approach holds promise for improving the treatment of GBM.     

The Drosophila Brahma (SWI/SNF) chromatin remodeling complex exhibits cell-type specific activation and repression functions

The Brahma (Brm) complex of Drosophila melanogaster is a SWI/SNF-related chromatin remodeling complex required to correctly maintain proper states of gene expression through ATP-dependent effects on chromatin structure. The SWI/SNF complexes are comprised of 8-11 stable components, even though the SWI2/SNF2 (BRM, BRG1, hBRM) ATPase subunit alone is partially sufficient to carry out chromatin remodeling in vitro. The remaining subunits are required for stable complex assembly and/or proper promoter targeting in vivo. Our data reveals that SNR1 (SNF5-Related-1), a highly conserved subunit of the Brm complex, is required to restrict complex activity during the development of wing vein and intervein cells, illustrating a functional requirement for SNR1 in modifying whole complex activation functions. Specifically, we found that snr1 and brm exhibited opposite mutant phenotypes in the wing and differential misregulation of genes required for vein and intervein cell development, including rhomboid, decapentaplegic, thick veins, and blistered, suggesting possible regulatory targets for the Brm complex in vivo. Our genetic results suggest a novel mechanism for SWI/SNF-mediated gene repression that relies on the function of a 'core' subunit to block or shield BRM (SWI2/SNF2) activity in specific cells. The SNR1-mediated repression is dependent on cooperation with histone deacetylases (HDAC) and physical associations with NET, a localized vein repressor.