染色质修饰酶在记忆中的作用

学习记忆的形成依赖于转录机制.近年研究发现,染色质修饰在基因表达调节中起重要作用.组蛋白乙酰化和去乙酰化是染色质修饰中最为常见调节方式,参与基因的转录调控.乙酰化可以激活转录,促进记忆的形成.组蛋白去乙酰化酶抑制剂可以增强突触可塑性,改善记忆损伤.因此,对于染色质修饰的深入研究,不仅有助于阐明记忆形成的分子机制,而且对记忆相关疾病的治疗以及新药物研发也具有重要指导意义.本文主要就组蛋白乙酰转移酶调节基因转录以及组蛋白去乙酰化酶抑制剂促进记忆形成的作用机理进行综述.     

真核生物染色质隔离子

真核生物的基因组较原核生物复杂 ,其基因包含在染色质中 ,基因的表达调控十分精细 .真核生物的染色体由一系列结构与功能独立的单元组成 ,各个单元的基因表达情况各不相同 .各单元间的结构称为边界元件 ,它使一侧的基因免受另一侧调控元件的影响 .这就是限定染色质转录功能区的染色质隔离子 (ｃｈｒｏｍａｔｉｎｉｎｓｕｌａｔｏｒ) .染色质隔离子是顺式作用的ＤＮＡ序列 ,它参与更高层次上的基因表达调控 .1　染色质隔离子的发现及生物学功能　　早在 1985年 ,人们就在果蝇的染色体 87Ａ7的两侧发现了ｓｃｓ和ｓｃｓ′ .Ｋｅｌｌｕｍ等作…     

组蛋白乙酰化与基因转录的关系

染色体核心心组蛋白乙酰化与基因的激活存在着密切的关系。本文主要介绍了组蛋白乙酰化与基因转录时基本的转录机器和转录激活子的关系,非组蛋白的乙酰化与其激活转录的关系,并例举了一些可能的机理。     

组蛋白乙酰化与真核基因的转录

在真核生物的染色质结构中,核小体核心组蛋白氨基末端可以被组蛋白乙酰基转移酶（ＨＡＴｓ）修饰。这种可逆乙酰化修饰作用可使染色质结构发生动态调整,从而影响基因的转录活性。     

Hi-C的干细胞染色质多重相互作用特征分析

染色质高级结构是基因转录调节的重要因素,染色质多重相互作用是高级结构中的一种,是多个(≥3)染色质片段在空间上相互接触而形成的紧凑结构。为了解染色质多重相互作用这类高级结构的特征及其在干细胞中分化中起到的作用,通过对Hi-C数据进行相关分析并计算基因的FPKM表达量,研究了染色质多重相互作用。分析发现:多重相互作用约占所有作用的30%,包含近70%的基因;此类作用区域的高表达基因多于低表达基因;且与组蛋白乙酰化相关性高。在分化过程中,多重作用位点数目和比例减少;位于多重作用区域的基因的表达略有降低;组蛋白乙酰化(H3K27ac和H3K23ac)在多重作用区域的减弱,而组蛋白甲基化(H3K4me3和H3K27me3)倾向于增强。结果表明,染色质多重相互作用是一种广泛存在的染色质高级结构,在干细胞分化中有重要作用,此类结构多具有H3K27ac修饰,调节基因的表达。总之,染色质多重相互作用是一种重要的基因转录调节因素,在细胞分化中具有调控作用。     

组蛋白乙酰化与癌症

由于组蛋白被修饰所引起的染色质结构的改变,在真核生物基因表达调控中发挥着重要的作用,这些修饰主要包括甲基化、乙酰化、磷酸化和泛素化等,其中组蛋白乙酰化尤为重要.组蛋白乙酰转移酶（HAT）和组蛋白去乙酰化酶（HDAC）参与决定组蛋白乙酰化状态.HAT通常作为多亚基辅激活物复合体的一部分,催化组蛋白乙酰化,导致染色质结构的松散、激活转录;而HDAC是多亚基辅抑制物复合体的一部分,使组蛋白去乙酰化,导致染色质集缩,并抑制基因的转录. 编码这些酶的基因染色体易位易于导致急性白血病的发生.另一方面,已经确定了一些乙酰化修饰酶的基因在染色体上的位置,它们尤其倾向定位于染色体的断裂处.综述了HAT和HDAC参与的组蛋白乙酰化与癌症发生之间关系的最新进展,以期进一步阐明组蛋白乙酰化修饰酶的生物学功能以及它们在癌症发生过程中的作用.     

组蛋白泛素化与去泛素化对染色质和基因表达的研究进展

组蛋白或转录因子或辅助因子进行泛素化和去泛素化,能够介导某些生理和病理过程。泛素化和去泛素化的动态平衡确保染色质处于健康的稳定状态。组蛋白泛素化酶和去泛素化酶通过识别DNA损伤位点、传导信号和招募修复因子等方式参与维持染色质稳态。组蛋白泛素化修饰和去泛素化修饰通过抑制(多数)或促进(少数)基因转录,从而影响基因表达。本综述主要关注组蛋白泛素化修饰和去泛素化修饰与染色质稳态和基因转录的关系,探讨这些过程在发育调控和在某些疾病中的作用,为相关疾病的治疗提供理论依据。     

组蛋白乙酰转移酶的研究进展

组蛋白乙酰化与基因转录等生物效应有密切的关系,组蛋白乙酰化主要是由组蛋白乙酰转移酶催化的。 要介绍了基因转录有关组蛋白乙酰转移酶,包括ＨＡＴＡ／Ｇｃｎ５ｐ、ｐ３００／ＣＢＰ、ｐ／ＣＡＦ、ＡＣＴＲ、Ｓｒｃ１、ＴＡＦ Ⅱ ２５０、Ｅｌｐ３等的来源,与其相互作用的蛋白质及其主要功能。     

真核生物基因表达在转录水平上的调节作用

在转录水平上的调节被认为是被细胞基因表达的调控的一个主要机制。在真核细胞中,染色质的结构是和这个调控密切相关的;一般认为,染色质构象的改变是进行转录在所必需的。 一、具有转录活性的染色质的超微结构具有转录活性的染色质(简称活性染色质) 。     

真核基因转录与转录调节相关复合物

真核细胞核中转录因子与染色质模板如何相互作用调节基因转录是基因表达调控研究的一个中心问题.近来的研究表明,参与基因转录的各种调节因子在核内形成多种复合物,如RNA聚合酶Ⅱ全酶、染色质重塑复合物、核小体以及增强小体等.这些复合物之间相互作用,调节染色质结构,在染色质模板上进一步组装成转录复合物,参与转录调节的各个环节,调节转录复合物活性.这些复合物的形成,整合了转录调节的各种信息,提高了转录调节效率,是真核基因有效、严格、有序表达的基础.另一方面,这些复合物的存在给基因表达调控的研究提出了新问题,发展新的研究思路和新的研究技术具有重要意义.     

Linker histone subtypes are not generalized gene repressors

Antibodies to the six chicken histone H1 subtypes and the variant histone H5 have been used in immunoprecipitations of crosslinked chromatin fragments (xChIPs) to map linker histones across the β-globin locus and the widely expressed glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and carbonic anhydrase (CA) genes in three cell types: 15-day embryo chicken erythrocytes, 15-day embryo chicken brain and the early erythroid cell line HD24. In erythrocytes, where the β-adult and β-hatching genes are active, the H1.01, H1.11L and H1.11R subtypes are substantially depleted throughout the β-globin locus and the neighboring heterochromatin, in contrast to the other four subtypes, in particular the more abundant H5. Active genes therefore carry high levels of some but not all linker histone subtypes. The situation is similar in HD24 cells, except that substantial depletions are found at the promoters of the adult β^A and embryonic β^ρ and β^ε genes, despite these genes not yet being active in HD24 cells. The distributions in the brain tissue are characterised by the absence of H1.02, H1.03 and H5 from the hypersensitive site HS3 and from the β-adult 3′ enhancer for the H1.11L and H1.11R subtypes. The data show that although linker histone subtypes play distinct cell-type specific roles in gene regulation, their widespread distribution indicates they are not intrinsically inhibitory to basic chromatin transactions.     

Insulation of the chicken beta-globin chromosomal domain from a chromatin-condensing protein,MENT

Active genes are insulated from developmentally regulated chromatin condensation in terminally differentiated cells. We mapped the topography of a terminal stage-specific chromatin-condensing protein, MENT, across the active chicken beta-globin domain. We observed two sharp transitions of MENT concentration coinciding with the beta-globin boundary elements. The MENT distribution profile was opposite to that of acetylated core histones but correlated with that of histone H3 dimethylated at lysine 9 (H3me2K9). Ectopic MENT expression in NIH 3T3 cells caused a large-scale and specific remodeling of chromatin marked by H3me2K9. MENT colocalized with H3me2K9 both in chicken erythrocytes and NIH 3T3 cells. Mutational analysis of MENT and experiments with deacetylase inhibitors revealed the essential role of the reaction center loop domain and an inhibitory affect of histone hyperacetylation on the MENT-induced chromatin remodeling in vivo. In vitro, the elimination of the histone H3 N-terminal peptide containing lysine 9 by trypsin blocked chromatin self-association by MENT, while reconstitution with dimethylated but not acetylated N-terminal domain of histone H3 specifically restored chromatin self-association by MENT. We suggest that histone H3 modification at lysine 9 directly regulates chromatin condensation by recruiting MENT to chromatin in a fashion that is spatially constrained from active genes by gene boundary elements and histone hyperacetylation.     

Conserved boundary elements from the Hox complex of mosquito,Anopheles gambiae

The conservation of hox genes as well as their genomic organization across the phyla suggests that this system of anterior–posterior axis formation arose early during evolution and has come under strong selection pressure. Studies in the split Hox cluster of Drosophila have shown that proper expression of hox genes is dependent on chromatin domain boundaries that prevent inappropriate interactions among different types of cis-regulatory elements. To investigate whether boundary function and their role in regulation of hox genes is conserved in insects with intact Hox clusters, we used an algorithm to locate potential boundary elements in the Hox complex of mosquito, Anopheles gambiae. Several potential boundary elements were identified that could be tested for their functional conservation. Comparative analysis revealed that like Drosophila, the bithorax region in A. gambiae contains an extensive array of boundaries and enhancers organized into domains. We analysed a subset of candidate boundary elements and show that they function as enhancer blockers in Drosophila. The functional conservation of boundary elements from mosquito in fly suggests that regulation of hox genes involving chromatin domain boundaries is an evolutionary conserved mechanism and points to an important role of such elements in key developmentally regulated loci.     

Inhibition of histone deacetylase activity is a novel function of the antifolate drug methotrexate

Methotrexate (MTX) is a dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) inhibitor widely used for treating human cancers, and overexpression of histone deacetylase (HDAC) is usually found in tumors. HDAC inhibitors (HDACi) can reactivate tumor suppressor genes and serve as potential anti-cancer drugs. In this study, we found that MTX shared structural similarity with some HDACi and molecular modeling showed that MTX indeed docks into the active site of HDLP, a bacterial homologue of HDAC. Subsequent in vitro assay demonstrated MTX’s inhibition on HDAC activity in human cancer cells. The global acetylation of histone H3 was also induced by MTX. Moreover, MTX inhibited immunoprecipitated HDAC1/2 activity but not their protein levels. This study provides evidence that MTX inhibits HDAC activity.     

SARs stimulate but do not confer position independent gene expression.

Two minimal scaffold-associated regions (SARs) from Drosophila were tested in stably transformed cells for their effects on the expression of reporter genes. The expression of genes bounded by two SARs is consistently stimulated by about 20- to 40-fold, if the average of a pool of cell transformants is analyzed. However, analysis of individual, stable cell transformants demonstrates that flanking SAR elements do not confer position-independent expression on the reporter gene and that the extent of position-dependent variegation is similarly large with or without the flanking SAR elements. The SAR stimulation of expression is observed in stable but not in transiently transfected cell lines. The Drosophila scs and scs' boundary elements, which do not bind to the nuclear matrix in vitro, are only about one-tenth as active as SARs in stimulating expression in stable transformants. Interestingly, the SAR stimulatory effect can be blocked by a fragment containing CpG islands (approximately 70% GC), if positioned between the SAR and the enhancer. In contrast, when inserted in the same position, control fragments, such as the scs/scs' elements, do not interfere with SAR function.