Reviving a neglected celestial underwater polarization compass for aquatic animals

Substantial in situ measurements on clear days in a variety of marine environments at depths in the water down to 200 m have demonstrated the ubiquitous daytime presence of sun-related e-vector (=plane of polarization) patterns. In most lines of sight the e-vectors tilt from horizontal towards the sun at angles equal to the apparent underwater refracted zenith angle of the sun. A maximum tilt-angle of approximately 48.5 degrees , is reached in horizontal lines of sight at 90 degrees to the sun's bearing (the plane of incidence). This tilt limit is set by Snell's window, when the sun is on the horizon. The biological literature since the 1980s has been pervaded with assumptions that daytime aquatic e-vectors are mainly horizontal. This review attempts to set the record straight concerning the potential use of underwater e-vectors as a visual compass and to reopen the field to productive research on aquatic animals' orientation and navigation.     

Underwater linear polarization: physical limitations to biological functions

Polarization sensitivity is documented in a range of marine animals. The variety of tasks for which animals can use this sensitivity, and the range over which they do so, are confined by the visual systems of these animals and by the propagation of the polarization information in the aquatic environment. We examine the environmental physical constraints in an attempt to reveal the depth, range and other limitations to the use of polarization sensitivity by marine animals. In clear oceanic waters, navigation that is based on the polarization pattern of the sky appears to be limited to shallow waters, while solar-based navigation is possible down to 200-400 m. When combined with intensity difference, polarization sensitivity allows an increase in target detection range by 70-80% with an upper limit of 15 m for large-eyed animals. This distance will be significantly smaller for small animals, such as plankton, and in turbid waters. Polarization-contrast detection, which is relevant to object detection and communication, is strongly affected by water conditions and in clear waters its range limit may reach 15 m as well. We show that polarization sensitivity may also serve for target distance estimation, when examining point source bioluminescent objects in the photic mesopelagic depth range.     

Central neural coding of sky polarization in insects

Many animals rely on a sun compass for spatial orientation and long-range navigation. In addition to the Sun, insects also exploit the polarization pattern and chromatic gradient of the sky for estimating navigational directions. Analysis of polarization-vision pathways in locusts and crickets has shed first light on brain areas involved in sky compass orientation. Detection of sky polarization relies on specialized photoreceptor cells in a small dorsal rim area of the compound eye. Brain areas involved in polarization processing include parts of the lamina, medulla and lobula of the optic lobe and, in the central brain, the anterior optic tubercle, the lateral accessory lobe and the central complex. In the optic lobe, polarization sensitivity and contrast are enhanced through convergence and opponency. In the anterior optic tubercle, polarized-light signals are integrated with information on the chromatic contrast of the sky. Tubercle neurons combine responses to the UV/green contrast and e-vector orientation of the sky and compensate for diurnal changes of the celestial polarization pattern associated with changes in solar elevation. In the central complex, a topographic representation of e-vector tunings underlies the columnar organization and suggests that this brain area serves as an internal compass coding for spatial directions.     

Evidence for instantaneous e-vector detection in the honeybee using an associative learning paradigm

Many insects use the polarization pattern of the sky for obtaining compass information during orientation or navigation. E-vector information is collected by a specialized area in the dorsal-most part of the compound eye, the dorsal rim area (DRA). We tested honeybees' capability of learning certain e-vector orientations by using a classical conditioning paradigm with the proboscis extension reflex. When one e-vector orientation (CS+) was associated with sugar water, while another orientation (CS-) was not rewarded, the honeybees could discriminate CS+ from CS-. Bees whose DRA was inactivated by painting did not learn CS+. When ultraviolet (UV) polarized light (350 nm) was used for CS, the bees discriminated CS+ from CS-, but no discrimination was observed in blue (442 nm) or green light (546 nm). Our data indicate that honeybees can learn and discriminate between different e-vector orientations, sensed by the UV receptors of the DRA, suggesting that bees can determine their flight direction from polarized UV skylight during foraging. Fixing the bees' heads during the experiments did not prevent learning, indicating that they use an 'instantaneous' algorithm of e-vector detection; that is, the bees do not need to actively scan the sky with their DRAs ('sequential' method) to determine e-vector orientation.     

Polarized skylight orientation in the desert antCataglyphis

Summary The desert antCataglyphis bicolor is able to use the pattern of polarized light in the sky as compass. By confronting the ant to single spots of artificially and naturally polarized light it is shown howCataglyphis uses the polarization pattern.When exposed to a horizontal e-vector,Cataglyphis was always oriented correctly. Orientation errors occurred, however, when other e-vector directions were presented. This indicates that the e-vector positions assumed by the ant do not coincide with the e-vector positions actually realized in the sky. From this it is concluded thatCataglyphis has no detailed knowledge of the actual azimuthal positions of the e-vectors. Instead, it is relying on a simplified celestial map of the polarization patterns in the sky (Fig. 7).Usually, the ant did not confuse celestial spots with identical e-vector directions. Even at sunset when the polarization pattern is completely ambiguous, correct orientation occurred. This suggests that the ant uses additional celestial cues such as the degree of polarization, the color or the intensity to find its way home when the sun is obscured.     

Polarotaxis and scototaxis in the supratidal amphipod Platorchestia platensis

Talitrid amphipods use many cues for orientation during forays between temporary burrows and feeding areas, and for locating beaches when submerged, with visual cues being particularly important. Little evidence exists for polarized light among these visual cues despite extensive orientation by celestial and underwater polarized light in other crustaceans and in insects. We used electroretinography to assess spectral sensitivity in the eye of the beach flea Platorchestia platensis, and behavioral studies to test whether linearly polarized light serves as an orientation cue. Two spectral classes were present in the P. platensis eye with maxima at 431 and 520 nm. Non-uniform orientation of amphipods in the laboratory arena required either light/dark or polarized cues. Scototactic movements depended on arena conditions (day/night, wet/dry), while orientation under linearly polarized light was wavelength-dependent and parallel to the e-vector. Subsequent tests presented conflicting and additive scototactic and polarotactic cues to differentiate among these responses. In dry conditions, orientation parallel to the polarization e-vector overcame a dominant negative scototaxis, confirming that polarotaxis and scototaxis are separate orientation responses in this species. These behavioral results demonstrate talitrid amphipods can perceive and orient to linearly polarized light, and may use it to orient toward preferred zones on beaches.     

Orientation in pied flycatchers: the relative importance of magnetic and visual information at dusk

We investigated the orientation of juvenile pied flycatchers, Ficedula hypoleuca, during autumn migration in south Sweden using orientation cage experiments, to study the relative importance of visual and magnetic information at sunset. We performed cage tests under 12 experimental conditions that manipulated the geomagnetic and visual sunset cues available for orientation: natural clear skies in the local or a vertical magnetic field; simulated total overcast in the local or a vertical magnetic field; natural pattern of skylight polarization and directional information from stars screened off, with the sun's position as normal or shifted 120 degrees anticlockwise with mirrors; reduced polarization in the local or a vertical magnetic field; directions of polarization (e-vector) NE/SW and NW/SE, respectively, in the local or a vertical magnetic field. The pied flycatchers were significantly oriented towards slightly south of west when they could use a combination of skylight and geomagnetic cues. The mean orientation was significantly shifted along with the deflection of the sunset position by mirrors. Reduced polarization had no significant effect on orientation either in the local, or in a vertical, magnetic field. The birds tended to orient parallel with the axis of polarization, but only when the artificial e-vector was aligned NW/SE. The mean orientation under simulated total overcast in a vertical, and in the local, magnetic field was not significantly different from random. It is difficult to rank either cue as dominant over the other and we conclude that both visual and magnetic cues seem to be important for the birds' orientation when caught and tested during active migration. Copyright 1999 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.     

Discriminative responses of squid (Loligo pealeii) photoreceptors to polarized light

Cephalopods behaviorally respond to polarized light. Electrophysiology experiments with the squid, Loligo pealeii, demonstrated that spike responses from individual photoreceptors are a cosine2 function of the e-vector orientation of a polarized stimulus. The discrimination limit to this polarization sensitivity depended upon the difference between the orientation of a polarized stimulus with a preferred e-vector. The limit ranged from 2 degrees to 9.2 degrees with a direct stimulus in the dark or 4.8 degrees -22.1 degrees with non-directed background illumination and the cells were least discriminative at the preferred orientations. This limit can be explained partly by the variability in anatomical alignment of microvilli in the photoreceptors around a dominant axis. A few light-sensitive retinal fibers showed no polarization sensitivity. The coding of polarization information suggests that light intensity is transformed into an average spike rate. This average results from silent periods interspersed between bursts of spikes, each burst possessing a consistent interspike interval. The variations in the length and frequency of silent periods depend upon the difference between the polarization e-vector and a preferred e-vector orientation. The minimal discriminated orientation of a squid photoreceptor agrees well with the minimum behavioral discrimination of polarized light by another cephalopod, the octopus.     

Evidence for true polarization vision based on a two-channel analyzer system in the eye of the water bug,Notonecta glauca

Summary Water bugs (Notonecta glauca) were set into flight in a room with a homogeneously illuminated ceiling and a light-emitting platform on the floor. In these conditions polarized UV light from the platform was more effective in causing the animals to fly down to the surface of the platform than was unpolarized UV light several times as intense. Experiments with an array of baffles that restricted the directions from which the polarization film on the platform could be seen showed that the polarized UV light is effective in eliciting descent only when the e-vector is perpendicular to the median sagittal plane of the animal (horizontal). It can be concluded that polarized UV light with horizontal e-vector is distinguished, as a special sensory quality, from unpolarized UV light.Notonecta thus provides an example of true polarization vision.The special orthogonal arrangement of the microvilli in the rhabdomeres of the UV visual cells in the ventral part of the eye (cf. Schwind 1983 b and Schwind et al., in press) is suggestive with regard to polarization vision. The microvilli of the two UV visual cells in the ommatidia looking forward and down are horizontal and vertical, respectively, and hence could serve as a two-channel analyzer system capable of distinguishing the polarized UV light reflected by a water surface from unpolarized UV light.     

Polarization contrast and motion detection

Form and motion perception rely upon the visual system’s capacity to segment the visual scene based upon local differences in luminance or wavelength. It is not clear if polarization contrast is a sufficient basis for motion detection. Here we show that crayfish optomotor responses elicited by the motion of images derived from spatiotemporal variations in e-vector angles are comparable to contrast-elicited responses. Response magnitude increases with the difference in e-vector angles in adjacent segments of the scene and with the degree of polarization but the response is relatively insensitive to the absolute values of e-vector angles that compose the stimulus. The results indicate that polarization contrast can support visual motion detection.     

Polarization-based brightness discrimination in the foraging butterfly, Papilio xuthus

The human eye is insensitive to the angular direction of the light e-vector, but several animal species have the ability to discriminate differently polarized lights. How the polarization is detected is often unclear, however. Egg-laying Papilio butterflies have been shown to see false colours when presented with differently polarized lights. Here we asked whether this also holds in foraging butterflies. After training individuals to feed on nectar in front of an unpolarized spectral light, we carried out three dual-choice tests, where the discrimination of (i) the spectral content, (ii) the light intensity, and (iii) the e-vector orientation were investigated. In the first test, the butterflies selected the trained spectrum irrespective of its intensity, and in the second test they chose the light with the higher intensity. The result of the e-vector discrimination test was very similar to that of the second test, suggesting that foraging butterflies discriminate differently polarized lights as differing in brightness rather than as differing in colour. Papilio butterflies are clearly able to use at least two modes of polarization vision depending on the behavioural context.     

Polarized-light sensitivity in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): characterization from multi-unit responses in the optic nerve

Integrated spike activity of axons from the optic nerve was measured in an investigation of the e-vector sensitive mechanism underlying the ability of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) for orientation in downwelling, linearly-polarized light. In anaesthetized, immobilized fish, one eye was exposed to incremental light flashes which were superimposed over closely controlled background conditions. Under scotopic and various photopic conditions, intensity/response curves were generated from the on-response of the optic nerve. Relative sensitivity curves were then obtained as a function of e-vector direction for the 5 kinds of receptor cells in this trout's retina: rods, ultraviolet cones (UV), short wavelength cones (S), medium wavelength cones (M), and long wavelength cones (L).Under scotopic conditions, no sensitivity to e-vector was apparent: thus, rods do not mediate polarization sensitivity. Under photopic conditions, parr weighing 8–10 g exhibited e-vector sensitivity in two orthogonal channels. A UV stimulus (380 nm) on a white background evoked a three-peaked response (0°, 90°, and 180°) to the e-vector orientations presented in 30° increments between 0° and 180°. In contrast, when the background was illuminated with appropriate short and long wavelength cut-off filters, M-and L-cones showed maximum responses only to the horizontal (90°) plane whether they were stimulated at their -absorption band or their -absorption band in the near UV. Isolated UV-cones gave maximum responses to the vertical (0° and 180°) e-vector, thus corresponding to a second channel. The blue sensitive, S-cones, did not show evidence of polarization sensitivity. As well, no evidence of the polarization sensitivity was observed under UV isolating background conditions in larger individuals, 50–78 g smolts, although the other cone mechanisms responded as in smaller individuals.     

Cone photoreceptor mechanisms and the detection of polarized light in fish

Summary Although numerous studies have demonstrated the detection of polarized light in vertebrates, little is known of the photoreceptor mechanisms involved. Recent evidence, however, indicates that cyprinid fishes possess both ultraviolet (UV) and polarization sensitivity suggesting that some vertebrates, like many invertebrates, may employ UV-sensitive cone receptors in polarization sensitivity. In this report, we describe experiments that determine which spectral types of receptors participate in the detection of polarized light. We used a heart-rate conditioning technique to measure increment thresholds of immobilized goldfish for plane-polarized, narrow-band (10 nm half max.) spectral stimuli (380 nm, 460 nm, 540 nm, 660 nm). A typical experiment involved isolating the activity of a cone photoreceptor mechanism by chromatic adaptation and measuring increment thresholds for spectral stimuli at e-vector orientations of the polarizer between 0° to 180° in 30° steps. The UV-, green- and red-sensitive cone receptor mechanisms showed clear evidence of polarization sensitivity while the blue-sensitive cone receptor mechanism was polarizationally insensitive. The average amplitude (base to peak height on Fig. 4) of the polarization sensitivity curves (UV-, green- and red-curves) was 0.67 log unit (standard deviation of 0.12 log unit), with the UV-sensitive cone receptor mechanism most sensitive to the vertical e-vector axis and the green- and red-sensitive cone receptor mechanisms most sensitive to the horizontal e-vector axis. The observation that different cone photoreceptor mechanisms have orthogonal polarization sensitivity in fish suggests that the perception of polarized light may enhance the capacity for visual discrimination in lower vertebrates.     

Seagrass depth limits

Examination of the depth limit of seagrass communities distributed worldwide showed that sea-grasses may extend from mean sea level down to a depth of 90 m, and that differences in seagrass depth limit (Z_c) are largely attributable to differences in light attenuation underwater (K). This relationship is best described by the equation

log Z_c (m) = 0.26 − 1.07 log K (m⁻)

that holds for a large number of marine angiosperm species, although differences in seagrass growth strategy and architecture also appear to contribute to explain differences in their depth limits. The equation relating seagrass depth limit and light attenuation coefficient is qualitatively similar to previous equations developed for freshwater angiosperms, but predicts that seagrasses will colonize greater depths than freshwater angiosperms in clear (transparency greater than 10 m) waters. Further, the reduction in seagrass biomass from the depth of maximum biomass towards the depth limit is also closely related to the light attenuation coefficient. The finding that seagrasses can extend to depths receiving, on average, about 11% of the irradiance at the surface, together with the use of the equation described, may prove useful in the identification of seagrass meadows that have not reached their potential extension.     

Neurobiology of polarization vision in the locust Schistocerca gregaria

The polarization pattern of the blue sky serves as an important reference for spatial orientation in insects. To understand the neural mechanisms involved in sky compass orientation we have analyzed the polarization vision system in the locust Schistocerca gregaria. As in other insects, photoreceptors adapted for the detection of sky polarization are concentrated in a dorsal rim area (DRA) of the compound eye. Stationary flying locusts show polarotactic yaw-torque responses when illuminated through a rotating polarizer from above. This response is abolished after painting the DRAs. Central stages of the polarization vision system, revealed through tracing studies, include dorsal areas in the lamina and medulla, the anterior lobe of the lobula, the anterior optic tubercle, the lateral accessory lobe and the central complex. Physiological analysis of polarization-sensitive (POL) neurons has focussed on the optic tubercle and on the central complex. Each POL neuron was maximally excited at a certain e-vector (phimax) and was maximally inhibited at an e-vector perpendicular to phimax. The neurons had large visual fields, and many neurons received input from both eyes. The neuronal organization of the central complex suggests a role as a spatial compass within the locust brain.     

Patterns and properties of polarized light in air and water

Natural sources of light are at best weakly polarized, but polarization of light is common in natural scenes in the atmosphere, on the surface of the Earth, and underwater. We review the current state of knowledge concerning how polarization and polarization patterns are formed in nature, emphasizing linearly polarized light. Scattering of sunlight or moonlight in the sky often forms a strongly polarized, stable and predictable pattern used by many animals for orientation and navigation throughout the day, at twilight, and on moonlit nights. By contrast, polarization of light in water, while visible in most directions of view, is generally much weaker. In air, the surfaces of natural objects often reflect partially polarized light, but such reflections are rarer underwater, and multiple-path scattering degrades such polarization within metres. Because polarization in both air and water is produced by scattering, visibility through such media can be enhanced using straightforward polarization-based methods of image recovery, and some living visual systems may use similar methods to improve vision in haze or underwater. Although circularly polarized light is rare in nature, it is produced by the surfaces of some animals, where it may be used in specialized systems of communication.     

How can dragonflies discern bright and dark waters from a distance? The degree of polarisation of reflected light as a possible cue for dragonfly habitat selection

SUMMARY 1. Based on the findings that some dragonflies prefer either ‘dark’ or ‘bright’ water (as perceived by the human eye viewing downwards perpendicularly to the water surface), while others choose both types of water bodies in which to lay their eggs, the question arises: How can dragonflies distinguish a bright from a dark pond from far away, before they get sufficiently close to see it is bright or dark? 2. Our hypothesis is that certain dragonfly species may select their preferred breeding sites from a distance on the basis of the polarisation of reflected light. Is it that waters viewed from a distance can be classified on the basis of the polarisation of reflected light? 3. Therefore we measured, at an angle of view of 20° from the horizontal, the reflection‐polarisation characteristics of several ponds differing in brightness and in their dragonfly fauna. 4. We show that from a distance, at which the angle of view is 20° from the horizontal, dark water bodies cannot be distinguished from bright ones on the basis of the intensity or the angle of polarisation of reflected light. At a similar angle of view, however, dark waters reflect light with a significantly higher degree of linear polarisation than bright waters in any range of the spectrum and in any direction of view with respect to the sun. 5. Thus, the degree of polarisation of reflected light may be a visual cue for the polarisation‐sensitive dragonflies to distinguish dark and bright water bodies from far away. Future experimental studies should prove if dragonflies do indeed use this cue for habitat selection.     

Orientation by polarized light in the crayfish dorsal light reflex: behavioral and neurophysiological studies

In decapod crustaceans, the dorsal light reflex rotates the eyestalk so that the dorsal retina faces the brightest segment of dorsal visual space. Stepwise displacements of white stripes elicit eyestalk rotations in the same direction as that of the stripe. Conversely, stepwise displacements of black stripes on a white background elicit eyestalk rotations in the opposite direction as that of the stripe. The reversal of the response with contrast inversion distinguishes the dorsal light reflex from an optokinetic reflex. When the visual scene is composed of polarized light, segmented by variations in e-vector orientation, displacement of segments containing near vertical e-vectors elicit responses similar to those elicited by a white stripe. Displacement of polarized stripes containing near horizontal e-vectors elicit eyestalk rotations similar to those elicited by a black stripe. The results are consistent with the use of polarized light in orientation. The stimulus conditions described above were also applied to visual interneurons (sustaining fibers) and oculomotor neurons and the results were generally in accord with the behavior. In the neural studies, it was possible to show that responses to polarized stripe displacements are predictable from the receptive field location and the neuron’s polarization tuning function. John P. Schroeter deceased on September 14, 2006.     

Krill-feeding behaviour of gentoo penguins as shown by animal-borne camera loggers

Animal-borne camera loggers were used to examine the patterns of prey encounter and feeding behaviour of gentoo penguins at King George Island, Antarctica. The still images from the camera loggers showed that the penguins encountered the swarms of krill for 25.5% (range: 8–38%) of their dives (>5 m) on average, during their foraging trips (mean duration of 5.4 h, n = 7 trips). They encountered krill swarms during the dives to 10–70 m depth, in pelagic as well as benthic habitats. In the benthic habitat, the penguins swam just above the sea floor and headed downward over a krill swarm, probably using the sea floor to assist them to feed on mobile swarms. The shallow coastal waters would be the important foraging habitat of gentoo penguins breeding in King George Island.     

Polarized light helps monarch butterflies navigate

During their spectacular migratory journey in the fall, North American monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus) use a time-compensated sun compass to help them navigate to their overwintering sites in central Mexico. One feature of the sun compass mechanism not fully explored in monarchs is the sunlight-dependent parameters used to navigate. We now provide data suggesting that the angle of polarized skylight (the e-vector) is a relevant orientation parameter. By placing butterflies in a flight simulator outdoors and using a linear polarizing filter, we show that manipulating the e-vector alters predictably the direction of oriented flight. Butterflies studied in either the morning or afternoon showed similar responses to filter rotation. Monarch butterflies possess the anatomical structure needed for polarized skylight detection, as rhabdoms in the dorsalmost row of photoreceptor cells in monarch eye show the organization characteristic of polarized-light receptors. The existence of polarized-light detection could allow migrants to accurately navigate under a variety of atmospheric conditions and reveals a critical input pathway into the sun compass mechanism.