Purification of Messenger Ribonucleoprotein Particles via a Tagged Nascent Polypeptide

The cytoplasmic fates of mRNAs are influenced by interactions between RNA-binding proteins and cis regulatory motifs. In the cytoplasm, mRNAs are present as messenger ribonucleoprotein particles, which include not only proteins that bind directly to the mRNA, but also additional proteins that are recruited via protein-protein interactions. Many labs have sought to purify such particles from cells, with limited success. We here describe a simple two-step procedure to purify actively translated mRNAs, with their associated proteins, from polysomes. We use a reporter mRNA that encodes a protein with three streptavidin binding peptides at the N-terminus. The polysomal reporter mRNA, with associated proteins, is purified via binding to a streptavidin matrix. The method takes four days, and can be applied in any cell that can be genetically manipulated. Using Trypanosoma brucei as a model system, we routinely purified 8% of the input reporter mRNA, with roughly 22-fold enrichment relative to un-tagged mRNAs, a final reporter-mRNA:total-mRNA ratio of about 1:10, and a protein purification factor of slightly over 1000-fold. Although the overall reporter mRNP composition is masked by the presence of proteins that are associated with many polysomal mRNAs, our method can be used to detect association of an RNA-binding protein that binds to specifically to a reporter mRNA.     

Interaction of a limited set of proteins with different mRNAs and protection of 5''-caps against pyrophosphatase digestion in initiation complexes.

A variety of 5'-3H-methyl-labeled, oxidized viral mRNAs were used as probes for detecting in wheat germ initiation complexes proteins that interact with, and can be cross-linked to, the 5'-cap structure. A limited and reproducible set of specific proteins was obtained with the different mRNAs. The binding of these proteins to the 5'-end of mRNA apparently results in protection against nucleotide pyrophosphatase digestion of the cap even in initiation complexes in which the 5'-end is susceptible to pancreatic RNase digestion. Cross-linked proteins from mammalian initiation complexes comigrated with several of the subunits of similarly treated eIF-3. A model for cap binding protein interaction with mRNA cap during initiation of translation is suggested.     

Finding the right RNA: identification of cellular mRNA substrates for RNA-binding proteins.

Defects in RNA-binding proteins have been implicated in human genetic disorders. However, efforts in understanding the functions of these proteins have been hampered by the inability to obtain their mRNA substrates. To identify cognate cellular mRNAs associated with an RNA-binding protein, we devised a strategy termed isolation of specific nucleic acids associated with proteins (SNAAP). The SNAAP technique allows isolation and subsequent identification of these mRNAs. To assess the validity of this approach, we utilized cellular mRNA and protein from K562 cells and alphaCP1, a protein implicated in a-globin mRNA stability, as a model system. Immobilization of an RNA-binding protein with the glutathione-S-transferase (GST) domain enables isolation of mRNA within an mRNP context and the identity of the bound mRNAs is determined by the differential display assay. The specificity of protein-RNA interactions was considerably enhanced when the interactions were carried out in the presence of cellular extract rather than purified components. Two of the mRNAs specifically bound by alphaCP1 were mRNAs encoding the transmembrane receptor protein, TAPA-1, and the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit II enzyme, coxII. A specific poly(C)-sensitive complex formed on the TAPA-1 and coxII 3' UTRs consistent with the binding of aCP1. Furthermore, direct binding of purified alphaCP proteins to these 3' UTRs was demonstrated and the binding sites determined. These results support the feasibility of the SNAAP technique and suggest a broad applicability for the approach in identifying mRNA targets for clinically relevant RNA-binding proteins that will provide insights into their possible functions.     

Mitochondrial mRNA localization is governed by translation kinetics and spatial transport

For many nuclear-encoded mitochondrial genes, mRNA localizes to the mitochondrial surface co-translationally, aided by the association of a mitochondrial targeting sequence (MTS) on the nascent peptide with the mitochondrial import complex. For a subset of these co-translationally localized mRNAs, their localization is dependent on the metabolic state of the cell, while others are constitutively localized. To explore the differences between these two mRNA types we developed a stochastic, quantitative model for MTS-mediated mRNA localization to mitochondria in yeast cells. This model includes translation, applying gene-specific kinetics derived from experimental data; and diffusion in the cytosol. Even though both mRNA types are co-translationally localized we found that the steady state number, or density, of ribosomes along an mRNA was insufficient to differentiate the two mRNA types. Instead, conditionally-localized mRNAs have faster translation kinetics which modulate localization in combination with changes to diffusive search kinetics across metabolic states. Our model also suggests that the MTS requires a maturation time to become competent to bind mitochondria. Our work indicates that yeast cells can regulate mRNA localization to mitochondria by controlling mitochondrial volume fraction (influencing diffusive search times) and gene translation kinetics (adjusting mRNA binding competence) without the need for mRNA-specific binding proteins. These results shed light on both global and gene-specific mechanisms that enable cells to alter mRNA localization in response to changing metabolic conditions.     

CAR-1 and Trailer hitch: driving mRNP granule function at the ER?

The targeting of messenger RNAs (mRNAs) to specific subcellular sites for local translation plays an important role in diverse cellular and developmental processes in eukaryotes, including axis formation, cell fate determination, spindle pole regulation, cell motility, and neuronal synaptic plasticity. Recently, a new conserved class of Lsm proteins, the Scd6 family, has been implicated in controlling mRNA function. Depletion or mutation of members of the Scd6 family, Caenorhabditis elegans CAR-1 and Drosophila melanogaster trailer hitch, lead to a variety of developmental phenotypes, which in some cases can be linked to alterations in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Scd6/Lsm proteins are RNA binding proteins and are found in RNP complexes associated with translational control of mRNAs, and these complexes can colocalize with the ER. These findings raise the possibility that localization and translational regulation of mRNAs at the ER plays a role in controlling the organization of this organelle.     

AGO-RBP crosstalk on target mRNAs: Implications in miRNA-guided gene silencing and cancer

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) and RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are important regulators of mRNA translation and stability in eukaryotes. While miRNAs can only bind their target mRNAs in association with Argonaute proteins (AGOs), RBPs directly bind their targets either as single entities or in complex with other RBPs to control mRNA metabolism. miRNA binding in 3′ untranslated regions (3′ UTRs) of mRNAs facilitates an intricate network of interactions between miRNA-AGO and RBPs, thus determining the fate of overlapping targets. Here, we review the current knowledge on the interplay between miRNA-AGO and multiple RBPs in different cellular contexts, the rules underlying their synergism and antagonism on target mRNAs, as well as highlight the implications of these regulatory modules in cancer initiation and progression.     

SBP2 binding affinity is a major determinant in differential selenoprotein mRNA translation and sensitivity to nonsense-mediated decay

Selenoprotein mRNAs are potential targets for degradation via nonsense-mediated decay due to the presence of in-frame UGA codons that can be decoded as either selenocysteine or termination codons. When UGA decoding is inefficient, as occurs when selenium is limiting, termination occurs at these positions. Based on the predicted exon-intron structure, 14 of the 25 human selenoprotein mRNAs are predicted to be sensitive to nonsense-mediated decay. Among these, sensitivity varies widely, resulting in a hierarchy of preservation or degradation of selenoprotein mRNAs and, thus, of selenoprotein synthesis. Potential factors in dictating the hierarchy of selenoprotein synthesis are the Sec insertion sequence RNA-binding proteins, SBP2 and nucleolin. To investigate the mechanistic basis for this hierarchy and the role of these two proteins, we carried out knockdowns of SBP2 expression and assessed the effects on selenoprotein mRNA levels. We also investigated in vivo binding of selenoprotein mRNAs by SBP2 and nucleolin via immunoprecipitation of the proteins and quantitation of bound mRNAs. We report that SBP2 exhibits strong preferential binding to some selenoprotein mRNAs over others, whereas nucleolin exhibits minimal differences in binding. Thus, SBP2 is a major determinant in dictating the hierarchy of selenoprotein synthesis via differential selenoprotein mRNA translation and sensitivity to nonsense-mediated decay.     

Proteins binding to 5'' untranslated region sites: a general mechanism for translational regulation of mRNAs in human and yeast cells.

We demonstrate that a bacteriophage protein and a spliceosomal protein can be converted into eukaryotic translational repressor proteins. mRNAs with binding sites for the bacteriophage MS2 coat protein or the spliceosomal human U1A protein were expressed in human HeLa cells and yeast. The presence of the appropriate binding protein resulted in specific, dose-dependent translational repression when the binding sites were located in the 5' untranslated region (UTR) of the reporter mRNAs. Neither mRNA export from the nucleus to the cytoplasm nor mRNA stability was demonstrably affected by the binding proteins. The data thus reveal a general mechanism for translational regulation: formation of mRNA-protein complexes in the 5' UTR controls translation initiation by steric blockage of a sensitive step in the initiation pathway. Moreover, the findings establish the basis for novel strategies to study RNA-protein interactions in vivo and to clone RNA-binding proteins.     

Coordination of endoplasmic reticulum and mRNA localization to the yeast bud

Localization of messenger RNAs and local protein synthesis contribute to asymmetric protein distribution not only of cytoplasmic but also of membrane or secreted proteins. Since synthesis of the latter protein classes occurs at the rough endoplasmic reticulum (ER), mRNA localization and distribution of ER should be coordinated. However, this coordination is not yet understood. In yeast, mRNA localization to the growing bud depends on the myosin Myo4p, its adaptor She3p, and the specific RNA binding protein She2p. These proteins mediate the localization of 23 mRNAs including ASH1 mRNA and mRNAs encoding membrane proteins. In addition, Myo4p and She3p are required for segregation of cortical ER to the bud. Here we show, with ASH1 mRNA as a model mRNA, that localizing messenger ribonucleoprotein (mRNP) particles comigrate with tubular ER structures to the bud, which requires the RNA binding protein She2p. Coordinated movement of the ASH1 mRNP with ER tubules but not their association with each other depends on Myo4p and She3p. Subcellular fractionation experiments demonstrate a cosegregation of ER and She2p, which is independent of Myo4p, She3p, or polysomes. Our findings suggest a novel model for mRNA localization that involves association of She2p and mRNPs with ER tubules and myosin-dependent cotransport of tubules and localized mRNPs.     

Photocrosslinking of proteins to maternal mRNA in Xenopus oocytes

Ultraviolet irradiation was used to covalently crosslink poly(A) RNA and associated proteins in Xenopus oocytes and reticulocytes. Each cell type contained similar as well as unique crosslinked proteins. The somatic cells contained a single 78-kDa 3' poly(A) tract binding protein while oocyte poly(A), however, was bound by this protein and at least three additional proteins. Based on the mass of poly(A) RNA, oocytes in their earliest stages of growth contained crosslinked proteins that were generally more prevalent than in fully grown oocytes. An investigation of possible messenger RNA-specific proteins was undertaken by a series of RNA injection experiments. Two radiolabeled SP6-derived mRNAs were injected into oocytes; the first, globin mRNA, assembled into polysomes, while the second, a maternal mRNA termed G10, entered a nontranslating ribonucleoprotein compartment. Following the induction of oocyte maturation, additional globin mRNA was recruited onto polysomes while G10 mRNA remained a nontranslating mRNP. The proteins that can be crosslinked to these injected mRNAs were detected by 32P nucleotide transfer. Each mRNA associated with shared as well as unique proteins, some of which were detected only in mature oocytes. The possible function of these proteins is discussed.     

ZBP1 regulates mRNA stability during cellular stress

An essential constituent of the integrated stress response (ISR) is a reversible translational suppression. This mRNA silencing occurs in distinct cytoplasmic foci called stress granules (SGs), which transiently associate with processing bodies (PBs), typically serving as mRNA decay centers. How mRNAs are protected from degradation in these structures remains elusive. We identify that Zipcode-binding protein 1 (ZBP1) regulates the cytoplasmic fate of specific mRNAs in nonstressed cells and is a key regulator of mRNA turnover during the ISR. ZBP1 association with target mRNAs in SGs was not essential for mRNA targeting to SGs. However, ZBP1 knockdown induced a selective destabilization of target mRNAs during the ISR, whereas forced expression increased mRNA stability. Our results indicate that although targeting of mRNAs to SGs is nonspecific, the stabilization of mRNAs during cellular stress requires specific protein-mRNA interactions. These retain mRNAs in SGs and prevent premature decay in PBs. Hence, mRNA-binding proteins are essential for translational adaptation during cellular stress by modulating mRNA turnover.     

Information relay from gene to protein: the mRNP connection

Eukaryotic messenger RNAs and their binding proteins are organized into structural units called ribonucleoprotein particles (mRNPs). Some mRNP proteins are ubiquitous, and might bind all mRNAs to ensure efficient translation. Other mRNA proteins, however, are cell-specific and bind only certain mRNAs that display regulated translation. This is particularly evident in early development, where some mRNP particles can be sequestered from the translational apparatus for months before they enter polysomes. Recent investigations suggest that these and other mRNP proteins bind specific sequences and regulate translation.     

Regulated poly(A) tail shortening in somatic cells mediated by cap-proximal translational repressor proteins and ribosome association.

The poly(A) tail plays an important role in translation initiation. We report the identification of a mechanism that operates in mammalian somatic cells, and couples mRNA poly(A) tail length with its translation state. The regulation of human ferritin L-chain mRNA by iron-responsive elements (IREs) and iron regulatory proteins (IRPs) is subject to this mechanism: translational repression imposed by IRP binding to the IRE of ferritin L-chain mRNA induces poly(A) tail shortening. For the accumulation of mRNAs with short poly(A) tails, IRP binding to an IRE per se is not sufficient, but must cause translational repression. Interestingly, puromycin and verrucarin (general translation inhibitors that dissociate mRNAs from ribosomes) mimick the negative effect of the specific translational repressor proteins on poly(A) tail length, whereas cycloheximide and anisomycin (general translation inhibitors that maintain the association between mRNAs and ribosomes) preserve long poly(A) tails. Thus, the ribosome association of the mRNA appears to represent the critical determinant. These findings identify a novel mechanism of regulated polyadenylation as a consequence of translational control. They reveal differences in poly(A) tail metabolism between polysomal and mRNP-associated mRNAs. A possible role of this mechanism in the maintenance of translational repression is discussed.