Potential risk modifications of GSTT1, GSTM1 and GSTP1 (glutathione-S-transferases) variants and their association to CAD in patients with type-2 diabetes

Background

Type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a major risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD) resulting in high morbidity and mortality. Glutathione S-transferases (GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1) are known for their broad range of detoxification and in the metabolism of xenobiotics. Recent studies revealed the relationship of GSTs variants with T2DM and CAD. In this case-control study we ascertained the association of GSTs variants in association with the development of CAD in patients with T2DM.

Methods

From the Southern part of India, we enrolled 222 T2DM patients, 290 T2DM patients with CAD and 270 healthy controls matched for age, sex and origin. Serum lipid profiles were measured and DNA was extracted from the blood samples. Multiplex PCR for GSTM1/T1 (null polymorphism) and PCR-RFLP for GSTP1 (105 A > G), were performed for genotyping of study participants. Gene frequency and lipid profiles were statistically analyzed for disease association.

Results

Regression analysis showed that, GSTM1-null genotype is associated with a 2-fold increase (OR = 2.925; 95% CI = 2.078–4.119; P < 0.0001) and GSTT1-null genotype is associated with a 3-fold increase (OR = 3.114; 95% CI = 2.176–4.456; P < 0.0001) to T2DM development. Ile/Val and Val/Val genotypes of GSTP1 also showed a significant risk for T2DM (OR = 1.423, CI = 1.041–1.946; P = 0.027 and OR = 1.829, CI = 1.064–3.142; P = 0.029). Increased odds ratio showed that GSTT1-null genotype had a moderately higher occurrence in T2DM–CAD patients (OR = 1.918, 95% CI = 1.144–3.214; P = 0.014) than T2DM patients without CAD. The level of HDL has significantly decreased in GSTT1-present than in GSTT1-null genotype (43.50 ± 4.10 vs. 45.20 ± 3.90; P = 0.004) when compared with control and T2DM patients. However, LDL level showed a significant increase in GSTT1-null than GSTT1-present genotype (108.70 ± 16.90 vs. 102.20 ± 12.60; P = 0.005). Although the GSTM1-null polymorphism showed no correlation with lipid profiles among T2DM and T2DM with CAD patients, GSTT1-null polymorphism attained a statistical significance for the level of LDL (127 ± 28.20 vs. 134 ± 29.10; P = 0.039) and triglycerides in T2DM with CAD patients (182.10 ± 21.10 vs. 191.20 ± 24.10; P = 0.018).

Conclusion

Our work concludes that GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 variants might contribute to the development of T2DM and GSTT1 variant alone is involved in the development of T2DM associated CAD complications in the South Indian population.     

The glutathione S-transferase M1 and P1 polymorphisms and rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis

The aim of this study was to determine whether the Glutathione S-transferase M1 (GSTM1) and P1 (GSTP1) polymorphisms confer susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Meta-analysis was performed on the associations between the GSTM1 and GSTP1 null genotypes and RA, and on the association between smoking or seropositive status and the GSTM1 null genotype in RA patients. Twelve studies involving 3,990 RA patients and 2,815 controls were included in the meta-analysis. All 12 studies examined the GSTM1 polymorphism and three the GSTP1 polymorphism. Meta-analysis of GSTM1 null polymorphism in 2,291 RA and 2,713 control subjects revealed no association between RA and the GSTM1 null genotype (OR?=?1.139, 95?% CI?=?0.914–1.419, p?=?0.246). Stratification by ethnicity indicated no association between the GSTM1 null genotype and RA in Asians or Europeans (OR?=?1.245, 95?% CI?=?0.729–2.124, p?=?0.422; OR?=?1.023, 95?% CI?=?0.794–1.318, p?=?0.863). Furthermore, there was no association between smoking and the GSTM1 null genotype (OR?=?0.943, 95?% CI?=?0.734–1.210, p?=?0.642). In addition, no association was found between seropositive status including anti-CCP (anti-citrullinated antibody) and/or RF (rheumatoid factor) and the GSTM1 null genotype. Meta-analysis of 915 RA and 1,082 controls revealed no association between RA and the GSTP1 null genotype (OR?=?0.965, 95?% CI?=?0.802–1.161, p?=?0.704). Furthermore, stratification by ethnicity indicated no association between the GSTP1 null genotype and RA in Europeans (OR?=?0.794, 95?% CI?=?0.594–1.061, p?=?0.119). This meta-analysis suggests that the GSTM1 and GSTP1 polymorphisms are not associated with the risk of RA. However, due to the small number of studies included and our inability to perform subgroup analysis by environmental factors, further studies are required to explore the roles played by GSTM1 and GSTP1 polymorphisms in the pathogenesis of RA.     

The role of GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTP1, and OGG1 polymorphisms in type 2 diabetes mellitus risk: a case-control study in a Turkish population

The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of some polymorphisms in GSTs (GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1) which are very important protective mechanisms against oxidative stress and in OGG1 gene which is important in DNA repair, against the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). 127 T2DM and 127 control subjects were included in the study. DNA was extracted from whole blood. Analyses of GSTM1 and GSTT1 gene polymorphisms were performed by allele specific PCR and those of GSTP1 Ile105Val and OGG1 Ser326Cys by PCR-RFLP. Our data showed that GSTM1 null genotype frequency had a 2-6 times statistically significant increase in a patient group (OR=3.841, 95% CI=2.280-6.469, p<0.001) but no significance with GSTT1 null/positive and GSTP1 Ile105Val genotypes was observed. When T2DM patients with OGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism were compared with patients with a wild genotype, a 2-3 times statistically significant increase has been observed (OR 1.858, 95% CI=1.099-3.141, p=0.021). The combined effect of GSTM1 null and OGG1 variant genotype frequencies has shown to be statistically significant. Similarly, the risk of T2DM was statistically increased with GSTM1 null (OR=3.841, 95% CI=2.28-6.469), GSTT1 null+GSTP1 (H+M) (OR=4.118, 95% CI=1.327-12.778) and GSTM1 null+OGG1 (H+M) (OR=3.322, 95% CI=1.898-5.816) and GSTT1 null+OGG1 (H+M) (OR=2.179, 95% CI=1.083-4.386) as compared to the control group. According to our study results, it has been observed that the combined evaluation of GSTM1-GSTT1-GSTP1 and OGG1 Ser326Cys gene polymorphisms can be used as candidate genes in the etiology of T2DM, especially in the development of T2DM.     

Evaluation of Glutathione S-Transferase GSTM1 and GSTT1 Deletion Polymorphisms on Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus Risk

Background

Due to the activity of GSTs in the detoxification of oxidative stress products, deletion polymorphisms of GSTM1 and GSTT1 may contribute to susceptibility to T2DM, since B-cells express very low levels of antioxidant enzymes. Recently, some studies have shown an association between GSTM1-null/GSTT1-null genotypes and an increased susceptibility to T2DM. A relationship between these polymorphisms and changes in the clinical parameters of diabetic patients has also been investigated. However, the results diverge considerably among the studies. Thus, this case-control study was designed to contribute to existing knowledge, as there are no studies on this issue performed in the Brazilian population.

Methods and Findings

A total of 120 patients and 147 healthy individuals were included in this study. GSTT1 and GSTM1 deletion polymorphisms were genotyped by multiplex SYBR Green Real-Time PCR. The GSTT1-null genotype conferred a 3.2-fold increased risk to T2DM relative to the present genotype. There was no association between GSTM1-null and T2DM risk. In diabetic patients, GSTT1-null conferred higher levels of triglycerides and VLDL-cholesterol, while GSTM1-null was associated with increased levels of fasting blood glucose, glycated hemoglobin and blood pressure. We emphasized a necessity for applying log-linear analysis in order to explore an interaction between these polymorphisms properly.

Conclusion

These results suggest that the GSTT1 polymorphism may play an important role in the pathogenesis of T2DM in the Brazilian population. This gene could then be added to a set of genetic markers to identify individuals with an increased risk for developing T2DM and complications associated with dyslipidemia in diabetic patients. Although there was no association of GSTM1 deletion polymorphism with susceptibility to T2DM, the influence of this polymorphism on important clinical parameters related to glycemia and blood pressure levels was verified. This finding suggests that both GSTM1-null and GSTT1-null may contribute to the clinical course of T2DM patients.     

Genetic polymorphisms in GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTP1, GSTM3 and the susceptibility to gallbladder cancer in North India

Abstract

The glutathione S-transferase (GSTs) are polymorphic supergene family of detoxification enzymes that are involved in the metabolism of numerous potential carcinogens. Several allelic variants of polymorphic GSTs show impaired enzyme activity and are suspected to increase the susceptibility to various cancers. To find out the association of GST variants with risk of gallbladder cancer, the distribution of polymorphisms in the GST family of genes (GSTT1, GSTM1, GSTP1, and GSTM3) were studied in 106 cancer patients and 201 healthy controls. Genotypes were analysed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP). The frequencies of GSTM1 null and GSTM3*BB genotypes did not differ between patients and controls. The overall frequency of GSTT1 null was lower in cases as compared with controls (p=0.003, Odds ratio (OR)?=?0.2, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.1–0.6). After sex stratification, the GSTT1 null frequency was reduced only in female patients (p=0.008, OR?=?0.2, 95% CI?=?0.1–0.6). However, the GSTP1, ile/val genotype and the val allele were significantly higher in cases than controls (p=0.013, OR?=?1.9, 95% CI?=?1.1–3.1; p=0.027, OR?=?1.5, 95% CI?=?1.0–2.1), respectively. To study gene–gene interactions, a combined risk of gallbladder cancer due to ile/val or val/val were calculated in combination with null alleles of GSTM1 and GSTT1 or the *B allele of GSTM3, but there was no enhancement of risk. Gallstones were present in 57.5% of patients with gallbladder cancer, but there were no significant differences between allelic/genotype frequencies of the studied GST genes polymorphisms between patients with or without gallstones. To best of our knowledge, this is the first paper showing ile/val genotypes and val allele of GSTP1 to be associated with higher risk of gallbladder cancer.     

Null genotypes of GSTM1 and GSTT1 contribute to increased risk of diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a common disease which results from various causes including genetic and environmental factors. Glutathione S-Transferase M1 (GSTM1) and Glutathione S-Transferase T1 (GSTT1) genes are polymorphic in human and the null genotypes lead to the absence of enzyme function. Many studies assessed the associations between GSTM1/GSTT1 null genotypes and DM risk but reported conflicting results. In order to get a more precise estimate of the associations of GSTM1/GSTT1 null genotypes with DM risk, we performed this meta-analysis. Published literature from PubMed, Embase and China Biology Medicine (CBM) databases was searched for eligible studies. Pooled odds ratios (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated using a fixed- or random-effects model. 11 publications (a total of 2577 cases and 4572 controls) were finally included into this meta-analysis. Meta-analyses indicated that null genotypes of GSTM1/GSTT1 and dual null genotype of GSTM1–GSTT1 were all associated with increased risk of DM (GSTM1: OR _{random-effects} = 1.60, 95%CI 1.10–2.34, P_OR = 0.014; GSTT1: OR _{random-effects} = 1.47, 95%CI 1.12–1.92, P_OR = 0.005; GSTM1–GSTT1: OR _{fixed-effects} = 1.83, 95%CI 1.30–2.59, P_OR = 0.001). Subgroup by ethnicity suggested significant associations between null genotypes of GSTM1 and GSTT1 and DM risk among Asians (GSTM1: OR _{random-effects} = 1.77, 95%CI 1.24–2.53, P_OR = 0.002; GSTT1: OR _{random-effects} = 1.58, 95%CI 1.09–2.27, P_OR = 0.015). This meta-analysis suggests null genotypes of GSTM1/GSTT1 and dual null genotype of GSTM1–GSTT1 are all associated with increased risk of DM, and null genotypes of GSTM1/GSTT1 and dual null genotype of GSTM1–GSTT1 are potential biomarkers of DM.     

Influence of glutathione S-transferase polymorphisms (GSTT1, GSTM1, GSTP1) on type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) risk in an endogamous population from north India

Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) belong to a group of multigene and multifunctional detoxification enzymes, which defend cells against a wide variety of toxic insults and oxidative stress. Oxidative stress leads to cellular dysfunction which contributes to the pathophysiology of diseases such as cancer, atherosclerosis, and diabetes mellitus. It is important to assess whether the glutathione S-Transferase (GSTT1, GSTM1 and GSTP1) genotypes are associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus as deletion polymorphisms have an impaired capability to counteract the oxidative stress which is a feature of diabetes. GSTT1, GSTM1 and GSTP1 gene polymorphisms were analysed in 321 patients and 309 healthy controls from an endogamous population from north India. An association analysis was carried out at two levels (a) individual genes and (b) their double and triple combinations. The proportion of GSTT1 and GSTM1 null genotypes was higher in diabetics compared to controls (GSTT1 30.8 vs. 21.0 %; GSTM1 49.5 vs. 27.2 %). The frequency of the null genotype at both loci was higher in diabetics (19.6 vs. 7.8 %) leading to an odds ratio of 2.90 (CI 1.76–4.78, P < 0.0001). At GSTP1locus, patients had a higher frequency of the V/V genotype (15.6 vs. 7.5 %) and significant susceptible odds ratio (2.56, CI 1.47–4.48, P < 0.001). A combination of null genotypes at GSTT1 and GSTM1 loci and V/V genotype of GSTP1 locus showed highest odds ratio (9.64, CI 1.53–60.63, P < 0.01). Overall this study highlights that GST genes may play an important role in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes. The risk is higher in individuals carrying more than one susceptible genotype at these loci. The potential role of GST polymorphisms as markers of susceptibility to type 2 diabetes needs further investigations in a larger number of patients and populations.     

Association between glutathione S-transferases M1, T1 and P1 gene polymorphisms and prostate cancer in Koreans

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in the developed world, and the incidence of this cancer is rising rapidly in many countries. Several polymorphic genes encoding enzymes involved carcinogenesis have been studied as potential risk factor of prostate cancer. Genetic polymorphisms in glutathione S-transferases M1 (GSTM1), T1 (GSTT1) and P1 (GSTP1) genes have been constantly reported to have a meaningful effect on prostate cancer risk. But other surveys of this relationship have yielded inconsistent results. To assess the possible contribution of the GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1 gene polymorphisms in prostate cancer, we performed a population-based study of 139 prostate cancer patients and 115 healthy controls based on their genotype distributions of the genes. There were no differences in distributions of genotype frequencies of GSTM1 and GSTP1 polymorphisms between prostate cancer patients and controls (OR 1.60, 95 % CI 0.886–2.860 for GSTM1 and OR 1.38, 95 % CI 0.739–2.577 for GSTP1). In contrast, the distribution of GSTT1-null genotype is significantly different between the prostate cancer case and controls (OR 0.26, 95 % CI 0.128–0.518, p < 0.001). Meanwhile, GSTP1 I/V and V/V genotypes were significantly associated with prostate cancer where the PSA level was more than 10.0 (OR 2.73, 95 % CI 1.319–5.639, p = 0.006). Thus, our data imply that the GSTT1-null genotype may not be a risk factor but a protective factor of prostate cancer and GSTP1 Val allele is a risk factor for the prostate cancer where the PSA level was high, although functional studies with larger sample size are necessary to elucidate these findings.     

MTHFR polymorphisms and ovarian cancer risk: a meta-analysis

The C677T and A1298C polymorphisms of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) have been reported to alter the risk of ovarian cancer. However, the results are still inconclusive. For better understanding of the effect of these two polymorphisms on ovarian cancer risk, a meta-analysis was performed. An extensive search was performed to identify all case–control studies investigating such association. The strength of association between these two polymorphisms and ovarian cancer risk was assessed by odds ratio (OR) with the corresponding 95?% confidence interval (95?% CI). 3,496 cases and 3,631 controls for C677T polymorphism and 3,280 cases and 3,346 controls for A1298C polymorphism were included in this meta-analysis. The results suggested that there were no significant associations between C677T and A1298C polymorphisms and ovarian cancer risk in overall comparisons in all genetic models (For C677T: TT vs. CC: OR?=?0.94, 95?% CI?=?0.71–1.24, P?=?0.65; CT vs. CC: OR?=?1.03, 95?% CI?=?0.93–1.14, P?=?0.57; TT/CT vs. CC: OR?=?1.01, 95?% CI?=?0.88–1.16, P?=?0.87; TT vs. CC/CT: OR?=?0.93, 95?% CI?=?0.72–1.20, P?=?0.58. For A1298C: CC vs. AA: OR?=?1.05, 95?% CI?=?0.88–1.25, P?=?0.65; CA vs. AA: OR?=?0.98, 95?% CI?=?0.88–1.08, P?=?0.66; CC/CA vs. AA: OR?=?0.99, 95?% CI?=?0.90–1.09, P?=?0.85; CC vs. AA/CA: OR?=?1.06, 95?% CI?=?0.90–1.26, P?=?0.46). Subgroup analysis based on ethnicities and influence analysis did not perturb the results. In conclusion, the results of this meta-analysis indicate that the MTHFR C677T and A1298C polymorphisms are not associated with ovarian cancer risk, especially in Caucasians.     

Glutathione S-transferase M1, T1 and P1 genetic polymorphisms, cigarette smoking and gastric cancer risk

Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) belong to a superfamily of detoxification enzymes that provide critical defences against a large variety of chemical carcinogens and environmental toxicants. GSTs are present in most epithelial tissues of the human gastrointestinal tract. We investigated associations between genetic variability in specific GST genes (GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1), the interaction with cigarette smoking and susceptibility to gastric cancer. The GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 polymorphisms were determined using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and fluorescence resonance energy transfer with Light Cycler Instrument. The study included 70 patients with gastric cancer and 204 controls. Associations between specific genotypes and the development of gastric cancer were examined by use of logistic regression to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The GSTM1 homozygous null genotype was associated with an increased risk of developing gastric cancer (OR = 1.73; 95% CI = 1.10-3.04). GSTT1 homozygous null genotype and GSTP1 genotypes were not associated with the risk of gastric cancer. Also there was no difference between cases and controls in the frequency of val-105 and ile-105 alleles (p = 0.07). After grouping according to smoking status, GSTM1 null genotype was associated with an increased gastric cancer risk for smokers (OR = 2.15; 95% CI, 1.02-4.52). There were no significant differences in the distributions of any of the other GST gene combinations. Our findings suggest that the GSTM1 null genotype may be associated with an increased susceptibility to gastric cancer.     

Genetic polymorphisms of GSTT1, GSTM1, and NQO1 genes and diabetes mellitus risk in Chinese population

OBJECTIVE: The aims of the present study were to assess whether the glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1), M1 (GSTM1), and NAD(P)H: quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1) genotypes are associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2 DM) and to ascertain whether the levels of blood lipids given exposure to diabetes are modified by the specific genetic polymorphisms of GSTT1, GSTM1, and NQO1. METHODS: This case-control study was conducted on 200 subjects. The genotypes were determined using a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism. RESULTS: The GSTT1-present genotype conferred a statistically significant 0.49-fold reduction in risk of T2 DM relative to the null genotype. Individuals with GSTT1-null or GSTM1-null genotype had higher levels of low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, and lipoprotein(a), respectively. There was no association between either GSTM1 or NQO1 polymorphism and risk of T2 DM. CONCLUSION: The present results suggest that the GSTT1 gene may contribute to the development of T2 DM and may be one of the candidate genes of T2 DM in Chinese population.     

Combined effect of GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 polymorphisms on histological subtypes of lung cancer

Genetic polymorphisms are natural genetic variations in the gene sequence that occur at a frequency of >1% in the population. This genetic variability (polymorphisms) can be a factor in cancer risk. The functional polymorphisms in GST genes play an important role in susceptibility to lung cancer. In our previous study, we reported that the combination of certain genotypes of GSTM1, GSTT1 and CYP1A1 is associated with lung cancer. The study has been extended to investigate the potential role of polymorphism in GSTP1 alone or in combination with the status of GSTM1 and GSTT1 genes in the likelihood of development of lung cancer. A total of 302 subjects (151 cases and 151 controls) were evaluated. Using a case–control design, individuals were genotyped for GSTs using multiplex polymerase chain reaction and restriction fragment length polymorphism techniques. The data obtained were analyzed using multiple logistic regression. The combined ‘at risk’ genotypes of GSTM1 null and GSTT1 null in comparison with ‘wild-type’ genotypes seems to be associated with a greater risk of lung cancer, but the results are not significant (odds ratio (OR) 2.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68–5.96) and for squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC) it was 1.6-fold (OR 1.6, 95% CI 0.49–5.68). In summary, our case–control study of lung cancer revealed that the effect of these polymorphisms is not very marked for different genotypic combinations of GSTP1, GSTM1 and GSTT1 in the context of developing lung cancer in a north Indian population. However, the increased risk was limited to SqCC, and was not found for other histological subtypes. Further analyses on this topic are needed.     

Investigation of glutathione S-transferase M1 and T1 deletions in lung cancer

Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) M1 and T1 are known to be polymorphic in humans. Both polymorphisms are due to gene deletions which are responsible for the existence of null genotypes. Previous studies have suggested that GST genotypes may play a role in determining susceptibility to a number of unrelated cancers, including lung cancer. The GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms were determined by PCR-based analysis in 75 lung cancer patients and 55 controls. The unconditional logistic regression analysis was used to calculate ORs and 95% CI. The frequencies of GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes were 37.3 and 22.7% in lung cancer patients and 27.3 and 16.4% in controls, respectively. When analyzed by histology the GSTM1 null genotype was more prevalent in squamous-cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma patients. Whereas, GSTT1 null genotype frequency was lower in small-cell lung cancer patients than controls. But these differences were not statistically significant. According to smoking status, null genotype for both gene are associated with an increase in risk for lung cancer. Our results suggest that GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms may play a role in the development of lung cancer for some histological subtypes and modifies the risk of smoking-related lung cancer.     

A meta-analysis of the relationship between glutathione S-transferases gene polymorphism and hepatocellular carcinoma in Asian population

The results from the published studies on the association between glutathione S-transferases (GST) gene polymorphism and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Asian population are still conflicting. GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 are the mainly mutant sites reported at present. This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between GST gene polymorphism and HCC risk in Asians. Association studies were identified from the databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and CBM-disc (China Biological Medicine Database) on February 1, 2012, and eligible investigations were synthesized using meta-analysis method. Results were expressed with odds ratios (OR) for dichotomous data, and 95?% confidence intervals (CI) were also calculated. Twenty-five investigations were identified for the analysis of association between polymorphic deletion of GSTM1 and HCC, consisting of 3,547 patients with HCC and 6,132 controls. There was a marked association between GSTM1 null genotype and HCC susceptibility (OR 1.48, 95?% CI 1.19–1.85, P?=?0.0004). GSTM1 null genotype was associated with HCC risk in Chinese. Furthermore, null genotype of GSTT1 was associated with HCC susceptibility in Asians. For the GSTM1–GSTT1 interaction analysis, the dual null genotype of GSTM1/GSTT1 was significantly associated with HCC susceptibility in Asian population. However, GSTP1 ile105?val gene polymorphism was not associated with HCC risk in Asian population. In conclusion, GSTM1/GSTT1 null genotype is associated with the HCC susceptibility. However, GSTP1 gene polymorphism is not associated with HCC risk.     

Glutathione S-transferase gene polymorphisms in Turkish patients with diabetes mellitus

Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) are enzymes involved in the metabolism of many disease-causing electrophilic substrates and protect the cells against oxidative stress. In the present study, we investigated the GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 gene polymorphisms in diabetic patients and healthy individuals and searched whether polymorphisms in GST genes are associated with diabetes mellitus (DM) in the Turkish population. The study population consisted of 98 unrelated healthy individuals and 98 patients with DM. Genotyping of GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 genes was performed using real time polymerase chain reaction with a Light Cycler instrument. Patients had a higher frequency of the GSTM1 null genotype than the control group (Odds ratios, OR = 3.7; 95% confidence intervals, CI = 2.05-6.70). However, there was no significant difference in the frequencies of the GSTT1 and GSTP1 gene polymorphisms between the patients and control group. The combined analysis of these three GST genotypes showed a further DM risk increase (OR = 5.7, 95% CI = 1.51-31.07). This is the first study to determine the association of diabetes with GST gene polymorphism in the Turkish population. These results show that GSTM1 null genotype may play a significant role in the aetiopathogeneses of DM and the GSTM1 gene may be a useful marker in the prediction of DM susceptibility of the Turkish population.     

Association of GSTM1 and GSTT1 Polymorphisms with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in a Tunisian Population

GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms have been proposed in relationship with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We investigated the association between these polymorphisms and COPD (as well as its subtypes emphysema and chronic bronchitis) in 234 COPD patients and 182 healthy controls in the Tunisian population. Genotyping was performed using multiplex PCR. GSTM1-null genotype frequency was significantly higher in COPD patients than in controls (P = 0.02); however, multivariate analysis of cofounding variables showed no independent association with this genotype (P = 0.073). In contrast, the association of the GSTM1-null genotype with emphysema was significant, even after adjustment for risk factors (P = 0.011). There were no significant differences in GSTT1 genotypes between patients and controls. The GSTM1 null allele is likely not an independent risk factor for COPD but is related to emphysema, whereas the GSTT1 gene is not associated with the disease.     

Association of glutathione S-transferase gene polymorphisms (GSTM1 and GSTT1) of vitiligo in Korean population

Vitiligo is an acquired pigmentary disorder of the skin involving melanocyte dysfunction. It has been reported that melanocyte impairment could be related to increased oxidative stress. The glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) are group of polymorphic enzymes that are important in protection against oxidative stress. To find the relationship between GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms with vitiligo susceptibility, GSTM1 and GSTT1 (homozygous deletion vs. non-deleted) polymorphisms between vitiligo patients (n=310) and healthy controls (n=549) were analyzed. We observed significant association in null alleles of the GSTM1 (P<0.001, OR=2.048, 95% CI=1.529-2.743). GSTM1 null type was also statistically different between two vitiligo subtypes and controls (Focal P<0.001, OR=2.224, 95% CI=1.499-3.298; Generalized P=0.001, OR=1.974, 95% CI=1.342-2.904). However, no significant association in GSTT1 (P=0.869, OR=1.024, 95% CI=0.775-1.353) was observed with vitiligo. In combined analysis of GSTM1 and GSTT1, both null type and GSTM1/GSTT1 (null/present) group showed significant differences between controls and vitiligo patients. These results suggest that GSTM1 null type might be associated with vitiligo susceptibility in Korean population.     

Genetic polymorphism of GST, NAT2, and MTRR and susceptibility to childhood acute leukemia

Polymorphisms of xenobiotic-metabolizing genes correlate with hereditary predisposition to neoplasia in some cases. The frequencies of polymorphisms of xenobiotic-metabolizing genes were determined in 332 children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, 71 children with acute myelogenous leukemia, and 490 healthy donors by allele-specific hybridization on a biochip. The frequencies of the GSTT1 null genotype and the GSTT1/GSTM1 double null genotype were significantly increased in children with acute leukemia as compared to healthy donors (OR = 1.9, P = 4.7E-5, and OR = 3.1, P = 2.5E-8, respectively). The frequency of NAT2 genotype 341T/T, 481C/C, 590G/G was increased 1.8-fold in children with acute leukemia as compared to healthy controls (P = 0.026). Analysis of gene-gene interactions showed that the combination of NAT2 genotype 341T/T, 481C/C, 590G/G with the GSTT1 and/or GSTM1 null genotypes was significantly more frequent in patients with acute leukemia than in the population control. In addition, the frequency of MTRR genotype 66G/G was reduced in girls with acute leukemia as compared to healthy female donors (OR = 0.50, P = 0.0015). The GSTT1 and/or GSTM1 null genotypes combined with MTRR genotype 66A/-were considered to be a risk factor for acute leukemia in girls. Thus, the polymorphisms of GSTT1, GSTM1, NAT2, and MTRR proved to influence the risk of childhood acute leukemia in residents of European Russia.     

Gene–gene interactions of drug metabolizing enzymes and transporter protein in the risk of upper aerodigestive tract cancers among Indians

Background: The combined genetic effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms may additively or synergistically contribute to the increased cancer risk. The interactions associated with xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes and transporter protein involved in the biotransformation and transport of xenobiotics could determine the functional outcomes over the independent effects of a single susceptibility gene in the risk of upper aerodigestive tract cancers. Methods: The hospital-based case–control study evaluated CYP1A1 (*2A and *2C), CYP2E1 (*1B, *5B, and *6), GST (M1, T1, and P1) and ABCB1 3435C>T polymorphisms among 408 histopathologically confirmed cases and 220 controls using polymerase chain reaction based methods in an Indian population. Results: The multivariate logistic regression analyses demonstrated potentially high risk gene–gene interactions with the concurrent deletions of the GSTT1 and GSTM1 genes and GSTP1 variant genotypes (OR 5.81; 95% CI 1.01–40.28), the deletions of GSTT1 and GSTM1 genotypes with variant genotypes of CYP1A1*2A (OR 8.21; 95% CI 1.91–49.48), GSTT1 and GSTM1 deficient genotypes along with CYP2E1*1B variant genotypes (OR 6.73; 95% CI 1.32–22.81), the polymorphic genotypes of ABCB1 and deficient GSTT1 (OR 6.08; 95% CI 2.21–16.76) and an enhanced risk with the combined variant genotypes of CYP1A1*2A, GSTT1 and ABCB1 (OR 11.14; 95% CI 2.70–46.02). Conclusion: The findings indicate that the interactions associated with various drug metabolizing enzymes and transporter protein exhibit high risk for UADT cancers than that ascribed to a single susceptible gene. This was particularly established among the polymorphic carriers of CYP1A1*2A, GSTT1 and ABCB1 genes in the population investigated.     

GSTM1 and GSTT1 gene polymorphisms as major risk factors for bronchopulmonary dysplasia in a Chinese Han population

Bronchopulmonary dysphasia (BPD) is a complex multifactorial disease with an obvious genetic predisposition. Oxidative stress plays an important role in its pathogenesis. Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) detoxify metabolites produced by oxidative stress within the cell and protect the cells against injury. In the present study, the hypothesis that polymorphisms in the GSTM1 and GSTT1 genes are associated with BPD in Chinese Han infants was examined. Sixty infants with BPD and 100 gestational age and birth weight-matched preterm infants without BPD were recruited. Genotyping for GSTM1 and GSTT1 was performed by multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The GSTM1 null genotype was more prevalent in BPD infants (65.0%) than in the control subjects (48.0%), which yielded higher risk towards BPD (odds ratio (OR): 2.012, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.040–3.892, p = 0.037). There was no statistically significant association of GSTT1 genotype with BPD (OR: 1.691, 95% CI = 0.884–3.236, p = 0.111), although the frequency of GSTT1 null genotype was higher among the BPD subjects (60.0%) than in the control patients (47.0%). GSTM1 and GSTT1 double null genotype was also higher in BPD group (38.3%) than in controls (21.0%) with a higher risk towards BPD (OR: 2.338, 95%CI = 1.151–4.751, p = 0.017). The results suggest that null genotypes of GSTM1 and GSTT1 genes may contribute to the development of BPD in our Chinese Han population.