Analysis of her1 and her7 mutants reveals a spatio temporal separation of the somite clock module

Somitogenesis is controlled by a genetic network consisting of an oscillator (clock) and a gradient (wavefront). The "hairy and Enhancer of Split"- related (her) genes act downstream of the Delta/Notch (D/N) signaling pathway, and are crucial components of the segmentation clock. Due to genome duplication events, the zebrafish genome, possesses two gene copies of the mouse Hes7 homologue: her1 and her7. To better understand the functional consequences of this gene duplication, and to determine possible independent roles for these two genes during segmentation, two zebrafish mutants her1(hu2124) and her7(hu2526) were analyzed. In the course of embryonic development, her1(hu2124) mutants exhibit disruption of the three anterior-most somite borders, whereas her7(hu2526) mutants display somite border defects restricted to somites 8 (+/-3) to 17 (+/-3) along the anterior-posterior axis. Analysis of the molecular defects in her1(hu2124) mutants reveals a her1 auto regulatory feedback loop during early somitogenesis that is crucial for correct patterning and independent of her7 oscillation. This feedback loop appears to be restricted to early segmentation, as cyclic her1 expression is restored in her1(hu2124) embryos at later stages of development. Moreover, only the anterior deltaC expression pattern is disrupted in the presomitic mesoderm of her1(hu2124) mutants, while the posterior expression pattern of deltaC remains unaltered. Together, this data indicates the existence of an independent and genetically separable anterior and posterior deltaC clock modules in the presomitic mesdorm (PSM).     

<Emphasis Type="Italic">her11</Emphasis> is involved in the somitogenesis clock in zebrafish

Somitogenesis requires an intricate process of pre-patterning, which is driven by an oscillator mechanism consisting of the Delta-Notch pathway and hairy- (h) and Enhancer of split- [E(spl)] related genes. With the aim of unravelling the complex mechanism of somite pre-patterning, we have conducted an extensive search for h/E(spl)-related genes in the third release of the Danio rerio genomic sequence. We identified 14 new h/E(spl) genes and analysed them by in situ hybridisation for their potential role in the somitogenesis process. We describe here the functional analysis of one of these genes, which we have named her11. her11 is a paralogue of her1 and, similar to her1, is arranged in a head to head fashion with another her gene, namely the previously described her5. It shares an expression in the midbrain-hindbrain boundary with her5, but is in addition cyclically expressed in patterns overlapping those of her1 and her7 and complementary to those of hey1. Furthermore it is expressed in the anterior half of the most caudally formed somites. We show that Delta-Notch pathway genes and fused somites (fss) are necessary for the control of her11 expression. However, some aspects of the her11 regulation suggest that at least one additional as yet unknown gene of the Delta-Notch cascade is required to explain its expression. Morpholino-oligonucleotide-mediated knockdown of her11 shows that it is involved in the zebrafish somitogenesis clock via an interaction with her1 and her7. We have also studied the role of hey1 by morpholino injection, but could not find a direct function for this gene, suggesting that it reflects the output of the clock rather than being a core component of the mechanism.Edited by B. Herrmann     

her1 and her13.2 are jointly required for somitic border specification along the entire axis of the fish embryo

Delta-Notch and FGF signaling are involved in the control of somitogenesis in zebrafish. her genes are generally known as downstream targets of Delta-Notch signaling, but the her13.2 gene from zebrafish has recently been shown to depend on FGF signaling only. We have here studied the functional role of her13.2 in conjunction with her genes that are under Delta-Notch control. We show that joint inactivation of her1 and her13.2 leads to a complete loss of all somitic borders, including the most anterior ones. This somitic phenotype is much stronger than would be expected from the effects of the inactivation of either gene alone. A joint inactivation of her13.2 and her7, which is a paralogue of her1, does not show this enhanced effect. Thus, our results confirm inferences from in vitro studies that her1 and her13.2 form specific heterodimers, which may directly be required for regulating further target genes. These two her genes thus constitute the link between Delta-Notch pathway and FGF signaling during entire somitogenesis. We show that this interaction is conserved in the rice fish medaka, as a joint inactivation of the respective orthologues leads also to the same phenotype as in zebrafish. In addition, our results suggest that the mechanisms for anterior and posterior somite formation are not principally different, although the anterior somites often seem more refractory to genetic perturbations.     

Fgf/MAPK signalling is a crucial positional cue in somite boundary formation.

The temporal and spatial regulation of somitogenesis requires a molecular oscillator, the segmentation clock. Through Notch signalling, the oscillation in cells is coordinated and translated into a cyclic wave of expression of hairy-related and other genes. The wave sweeps caudorostrally through the presomitic mesoderm (PSM) and finally arrests at the future segmentation point in the anterior PSM. By experimental manipulation and analyses in zebrafish somitogenesis mutants, we have found a novel component involved in this process. We report that the level of Fgf/MAPK activation (highest in the posterior PSM) serves as a positional cue within the PSM that regulates progression of the cyclic wave and thereby governs the positions of somite boundary formation.     

Synchronized oscillation of the segmentation clock gene in vertebrate development

In vertebrate somitogenesis, “segmentation clock” genes (her in zebrafish, hes in mouse, and hairy in chick) show oscillation, synchronized over nearby cells through intercellular interaction. In zebrafish, neighboring cells interact by Delta-Notch signaling to realize synchronization. Under Delta-Notch, however, a cell with a high expression of the segmentation clock gene tends to suppress its expression in adjacent cells, which might produce spatial heterogeneity instead of synchronized oscillation. Here we studied the conditions under which pre-somitic mesoderm cells show synchronized oscillation of gene expression mathematically. We adopted a model that explicitly considers the kinetics of the mRNA and proteins of the segmentation clock gene and cell–cell interaction via Delta-Notch signaling. From statistical study of a model with randomly generated parameters, we revealed how the likelihood that the system generates stable synchronized oscillation depends on the rate of each reaction in the gene–protein kinetics.     

Notch signalling synchronizes the zebrafish segmentation clock but is not needed to create somite boundaries

Somite segmentation depends on a gene expression oscillator or clock in the posterior presomitic mesoderm (PSM) and on read-out machinery in the anterior PSM to convert the pattern of clock phases into a somite pattern. Notch pathway mutations disrupt somitogenesis, and previous studies have suggested that Notch signalling is required both for the oscillations and for the read-out mechanism. By blocking or overactivating the Notch pathway abruptly at different times, we show that Notch signalling has no essential function in the anterior PSM and is required only in the posterior PSM, where it keeps the oscillations of neighbouring cells synchronized. Using a GFP reporter for the oscillator gene her1, we measure the influence of Notch signalling on her1 expression and show by mathematical modelling that this is sufficient for synchronization. Our model, in which intracellular oscillations are generated by delayed autoinhibition of her1 and her7 and synchronized by Notch signalling, explains the observations fully, showing that there are no grounds to invoke any additional role for the Notch pathway in the patterning of somite boundaries in zebrafish.     

Comparative analysis of her genes during fish somitogenesis suggests a mouse/chick-like mode of oscillation in medaka

Somitogenesis is the key developmental step, which divides the vertebrate body axis into segmentally repeated structures. It requires an intricate process of pre-patterning, which is driven by an oscillator mechanism consisting of the Delta–Notch pathway and various hairy- and Enhancer of split-related (her) genes. The subset of her genes, which are necessary to set up the segmentation clock, reveal a complex scenario of interactions. To understand which her genes are essential core players in this process, we compared the expression patterns of somitogenesis-relevant her genes in zebrafish and medaka (Oryzias latipes). Most of the respective medaka genes (Ol-her) are duplicated like what has been shown for zebrafish (Dr-her) and pufferfish genes (Fr-her). However, zebrafish genes show some additional copies and significant differences in expression patterns. For the paralogues Dr-her1 and Dr-her11, only one copy exists in the medaka (Ol-her1/11), which combines the expression patterns found for both zebrafish genes. In contrast to Dr-her5, the medaka orthologue appears to play a role in somitogenesis because it is expressed in the presomitic mesoderm (PSM). PSM expression also suggests a role for both Ol-her13 genes, homologues of mouse Hes6 (mHes6), in this process, which would be consistent with a conserved mHes6 homologue gear in the segmentation clock exclusively in lower vertebrates. Members of the mHes5 homologue group seem to be involved in somite formation in all vertebrates (e.g. Dr- and Ol-her12), although different paralogues are additionally recruited in zebrafish (e.g. Dr-her15) and medaka (e.g. Ol-her4). We found that the linkage between duplicates is strongly conserved between pufferfish and medaka and less well conserved in zebrafish. Nevertheless, linkage and orientation of several her duplicates are identical in all three species. Therefore, small-scale duplications must have happened before whole genome duplication occurred in a fish ancestor. Expression of multiple stripes in the intermediate PSM, characteristic for the zebrafish orthologues, is absent in all somitogenesis-related her genes of the medaka. In fact, the expression mode of Ol-her1/11 and Ol-her5 indicates dynamism similar to the hairy clock genes in chicken and mouse. This suggests that Danio rerio shows a rather derived clock mode when compared to other fish species and amniotes or that, alternatively, the clock mode evolved independently in zebrafish, medaka and mouse or chicken.An erratum to this article can be found at     

Synchronised cycling gene oscillations in presomitic mesoderm cells require cell-cell contact

Segmentation of the vertebrate body axis is initiated early in development with the sequential formation of somites. Somitogenesis is temporally regulated by a molecular oscillator, the segmentation clock, which acts within presomitic mesoderm (PSM) cells to drive periodic expression of the cyclic genes. We have investigated the kinetics of the progression of cycling gene expression along the PSM. Here we show that c-hairy1 and c-hairy2 mRNA expression traverses the PSM in an entirely progressive manner and that both these genes and c-Lfng maintain a similar anterior limit of expression during each cycle. However, some differences are seen regarding both the onset of a new oscillation of these genes and the duration of their expression in the caudal PSM. We also investigated whether oscillating cyclic gene expression in the PSM is entirely cell autonomous. We find that while small PSM explants are still able to maintain their oscillation schedule, once they are dissociated, PSM cells are no longer able to maintain synchronous oscillations. The results imply that cell communication or a community effect is essential for the normal pattern of cyclic gene expression in these cells.