Essential role of an adenylate cyclase in regulating Vibrio vulnificus virulence

Vibrio vulnificus, a halophilic estuarine bacterium, causes a fatal septicemia and necrotizing wound infection. To investigate the role of cAMP in V. vulnificus virulence regulation, an in-frame deletion mutant of the cya gene encoding adenylate cyclase was constructed. The cya null mutation resulted in a pleiotropic change of virulence phenotypes. The production of hemolysin and protease, the motility, and the cytotoxicity were decreased by the cya mutation. The defects in the cya mutant were functionally complemented in trans by a plasmid carrying the wild type cya allele. The V. vulnificus cya mutant exhibited a 100-fold increase in LD50 to mice. The result indicates that cAMP plays an essential role in the global regulation of V. vulnificus virulence.     

Differential control by IHF and cAMP of two oppositely oriented genes, hpt and gcd, in Escherichia coli: significance of their partially overlapping regulatory elements

The hpt gene, which encodes hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase, is located next to, but transcribed in the opposite direction to, the gcd gene, which codes for a membrane-bound glucose dehydrogenase, at 3.1 min on the Escherichia coli genome. In their promoter-operator region, putative regulatory elements for integration host factor (IHF) and for the complex comprising 3', 5'-cyclic AMP (cAMP) and its receptor protein (CRP) are present, and they overlap the promoters for hpt and gcd, respectively. The involvement of IHF and cAMP-CRP, as well as the corresponding putative cis-acting elements, in the expression of the two genes was investigated by using lacZ operon fusions. In an adenylate cyclase-deficient strain, addition of cAMP increased the expression of hpt and reduced the expression of gcd. In agreement with this observation, the introduction of mutations into the putative binding element for the cAMP-CRP complex enhanced the expression of gcd. In contrast, mutations introduced into the putative IHF-binding elements increased the level of hpt expression. Similar results were obtained with IHF-defective strains. Thus, the expression of the two genes is regulated in a mutually exclusive manner. Additional experiments with mutations at the -10 sequence of the gcd promoter suggest that the binding of RNA polymerase to the hpt promoter interferes with the interaction of RNA polymerase with the gcd promoter, and vice versa.     

Polyamines and glutamate decarboxylase-based acid resistance in Escherichia coli

The expression of gadA and gadB, which encode two glutamate decarboxylases (GADs) of Escherichia coli, is induced by an acidic environment and participate in acid resistance. In this study, we constructed a polyamine-deficient mutant and investigated the role of polyamines in acid resistance. The expression of gadA and gadB was shown to be dependent on polyamines. For that reason, the polyamine-deficient mutant was completely devoid of GAD activity and was very susceptible to low pH if large amounts of polyamines were not provided. We also showed that the polyamine-deficient mutant contained higher cAMP levels than the isogenic polyamine-proficient wild type, and cAMP negatively regulated the expression of gadA and gadB. Therefore, introduction of the cya (encoding adenylate cyclase) mutation allele into the polyamine-deficient mutant resulted in the increment of GAD activity and thus restored the reduced acid resistance of the mutant. The positive regulators, H-NS (histone-like protein, encoded by the hns gene) and RpoS (alternative RNA polymerase sigma subunit, encoded by rpoS gene), also significantly governed the expression of gadA and gadB, respectively. However, polyamines did not regulate either the intracellular H-NS level or rpoS expression under these culture conditions. These results strongly suggest that there are at least two different regulatory systems in acid resistance, one is positive regulation via a H-NS/RpoS system and the other is negative regulation via a polyamine/cAMP system.     

A novel function of the cAMP-CRP complex in Escherichia coli: cAMP-CRP functions as an adaptor for the CytR repressor in the deo operon

Unlike classical bacterial repressors, the CytR repressor of Escherichia coli cannot independently regulate gene expression. Here we show that CytR binding to the deoP2 promoter relies on interaction with the master gene regulatory protein, CRP, and, furthermore, that cAMP-CRP and CytR bind co-operatively to deoP2. Using mutant promoters we show that tandem, properly spaced DNA-bound cAMP-CRP complexes are required for this co-operative binding. These data suggest that CytR forms a bridge between tandem cAMP-CRP complexes, and that cAMP-CRP functions as an adaptor for CytR. The implications of this new version of negative control in E. coli on bacterial gene expression and on combinatorial gene regulation in higher organisms are discussed.     

Segment-specific mutagenesis of the regulatory region in the Escherichia coli galactose operon: isolation of mutations reducing the initiation of transcription and translation

Using hydroxylamine mutagenesis in vitro, mutations were introduced into a short DNA fragment containing the two overlapping promoters of the Escherichia coli galactose operon and the start of the first gal gene, galE. The mutagenised fragment was inserted into a lac expression plasmid. In such a vector, lac expression is controlled by the gal promoter region. Amongst eighteen candidates in which expression was reduced due to mutations in the gal fragment, twelve contained promoter mutations and six carried mutations that reduce the initiation of galE translation. The candidates in which promoter activity was reduced contained mutations affecting the promoter P1, which is dependent on the cyclic AMP-receptor protein complex (cAMP-CRP) for activation. All carried mutations in the sequence 5'GTGA3' at the CRP binding site. One of the twelve also contained a second mutation affecting the second promoter, P2, which normally functions in the absence of cAMP-CRP. Amongst the six candidates affecting galE translation, two contained a mutation that changes the initiator codon from AUG to AUA and almost completely suppresses galE expression. The mutations in the other four candidates affect the ribosome binding sequence, 5'GGAG3'. However, multiple mutations that abolish this sequence do not totally suppress galE expression, showing that there must be another way to guide ribosomes to the correct initiation site.