Hormone replacement therapy.

Hormone replacement therapy is increasingly being used for purposes unrelated to the alleviation of menopausal symptoms, such as the prevention of osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease. Clinical trials, however, suggest that the one drug/many purposes concept may be too optimistic. The availability of new estrogen-like compounds and the discovery of a second estrogen receptor have opened new possibilities for more specific drug development.     

Hormone replacement therapy increases renal kallikrein excretion in healthy postmenopausal women

Hypertension and its related increase in cardiovascular morbidity in postmenopausal women is a major public health problem. The hypotensive property of urinary kallikrein has been described since 1909. Despite the controversy surrounding the effects of hormone replacement therapy on blood pressure regulation, its mechanisms remain incompletely understood, and no evidence has yet been provided for its effects on renal kallikrein excretion in postmenopausal women. In a double-blind, randomized study we examined the effects of hormone replacement therapy in the form of 2 mg 17-beta estradiol (ERT) or 2 mg 17-beta estradiol combined with continuous 5 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate (HRT) on urinary kallikrein excretion in postmenopausal women. Thirty-nine postmenopausal women collected their urine for 24 hours on two separate occasions 3 months apart. During the 3 month period women were randomized to placebo, ERT, or HRT. Urine samples were assayed for kallikrein activity, normalized to urine creatinine and expressed as mU/gm creatinine. Urinary kallikrein excretion increased significantly after 3 months in the ERT (p < 0.001) and HRT (p < 0.01) groups, and decreased non-significantly in the placebo group (p > 0.06). There were no significant blood pressure changes after 3 months of therapy. The findings demonstrate that hormone replacement therapy in the form of estrogen or estrogen combined with continuous medroxyprogesterone is effective in increasing urinary kallikrein excretion. Given that a decrease in kallikrein excretion may mark risk for development of hypertension, the findings of this study are of value in demonstrating a novel mechanism underlying cardioprotective properties of postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy in women without pre-existing coronary disease.     

Hormone replacement therapy and cardiovascular disease.

A large amount of research continues to be conducted on the mechanisms of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) effects, and the first of the large clinical trials published its results during the past year. In addition to the well known effects on LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, and triglycerides, recent studies confirmed that estrogen with or without a progestin lowers lipoprotein (a) concentrations in women (but not in men). In men, estrogen appears to have a similar effect on other lipids and lipoproteins and on plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 as in women. A comparison of estrogen with simvastatin indicated that simvastatin is better at lowering LDL-cholesterol while estrogen is better at raising HDL-cholesterol; when given in combination the additional effects were modest. Estrogen and simvastatin had similar beneficial effects on endothelial function. The estrogen effect on endothelial function may be blocked by medroxyprogesterone, but the data are inconsistent. These studies of intermediate outcomes were put in perspective by the results of a landmark secondary prevention trial of coronary heart disease (CHD). This randomized placebo-controlled trial (Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study) of conjugated equine estrogens plus medroxyprogesterone failed to show the anticipated reduction in CHD, and at the same time the threefold increase in venous thromboembolism confirmed that HRT is procoagulant. Therefore, it is still not known whether HRT is a viable option for the prevention of CHD. The preliminary data on selective estrogen receptor modulators are not overly promising, but a definitive trial to test whether raloxifene will reduce CHD is ongoing.     

Hormone replacement therapy and risk of venous thromboembolism in postmenopausal women: systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective To assess the risk of venous thromboembolism in women using hormone replacement therapy by study design, characteristics of the therapy and venous thromboembolism, and clinical background.Design Systematic review and meta-analysis.Data sources Medline.Studies reviewed Eight observational studies and nine randomised controlled trials.Inclusion criteria Studies on hormone replacement therapy that reported venous thromboembolism.Review measures Homogeneity between studies was analysed using χ² and I² statistics. Overall risk of venous thromboembolism was assessed from a fixed effects or random effects model.Results Meta-analysis of observational studies showed that oral oestrogen but not transdermal oestrogen increased the risk of venous thromboembolism. Compared with non-users of oestrogen, the odds ratio of first time venous thromboembolism in current users of oral oestrogen was 2.5 (95% confidence interval 1.9 to 3.4) and in current users of transdermal oestrogen was 1.2 (0.9 to 1.7). Past users of oral oestrogen had a similar risk of venous thromboembolism to never users. The risk of venous thromboembolism in women using oral oestrogen was higher in the first year of treatment (4.0, 2.9 to 5.7) compared with treatment for more than one year (2.1, 1.3 to 3.8; P<0.05). No noticeable difference in the risk of venous thromboembolism was observed between unopposed oral oestrogen (2.2, 1.6 to 3.0) and opposed oral oestrogen (2.6, 2.0 to 3.2). Results from nine randomised controlled trials confirmed the increased risk of venous thromboembolism among women using oral oestrogen (2.1, 1.4 to 3.1). The combination of oral oestrogen and thrombogenic mutations or obesity further enhanced the risk of venous thromboembolism, whereas transdermal oestrogen did not seem to confer additional risk in women at high risk of venous thromboembolism.Conclusion Oral oestrogen increases the risk of venous thromboembolism, especially during the first year of treatment. Transdermal oestrogen may be safer with respect to thrombotic risk. More data are required to investigate differences in risk across the wide variety of hormone regimens, especially the different types of progestogens.     

Hormone replacement therapy and cardiovascular disease: lessons from a monkey model of postmenopausal women

Concerns exist about the cardiovascular effects of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in postmenopausal women because results from the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) and the Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study (HERS) are contradictory. In both of these studies, postmenopausal conjugated equine estrogens + medroxyprogesterone acetate did not reduce risk, and somewhat increased the risk of myocardial infarction in both primary (WHI) and secondary (HERS) prevention. These results appear to contradict numerous observational clinical trials and animal studies, which reported profound beneficial effects of HRT on cardiovascular disease risk. Results of both human and monkey studies indicate that estrogen replacement therapy (ERT)/HRT is effective in inhibiting progression of early stage (fatty streak) atherosclerosis but that ERT/HRT is much less effective in inhibiting progression of more advanced (established plaque) atherosclerosis. Results of these monkey studies are consistent with those of studies in women wherein ERT/HRT was initiated in postmenopausal women with different initial amounts of atherosclerosis. Based on these findings, it is speculated that ERT/HRT may be more cardioprotective in younger postmenopausal women with less coronary artery disease, and less effective in women with established coronary artery disease. Researchers are challenged to define the relative cardiovascular risk/benefit in different populations of postmenopausal women based on differences in age, amounts of pre-existing atherosclerosis, and risk factors.     

Hormone replacement therapy and cardiovascular disease

This year's work on hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and cardiovascular disease has been remarkable for the publication of the first randomised controlled trial of HRT use, the Heart Estrogen Replacement Study (HERS). The findings go against not only the trend of previous observational epidemiological studies, but also against findings in the very many studies which have previously shown and continue to show this year a beneficial effect of HRT on a large variety of cardiovascular risk factors, including endothelial function, here reviewed. The aspect of the effect of HRT on clotting variables is clearly crucial given the increased risk of venous thrombosis, and also increased number of cardiac events in the first 4 months of the HERS. Prothrombotic factors increase with age in women, and HRT alters these, particularly fibrinogen, factor VII, and PAI (less change with transdermal HRT) and antithrombin III. In normal women therefore the balance should be towards fibrinolysis rather than coagulation. Work has been presented in abstract for clarifying the effects of HRT on coagulation markers and grasping the problem of differences according to its route of administration. The full publications on this work are expected shortly. We are still awaiting evidence from randomized controlled trials of HRT in primary prevention; one is now recruited but will not report until 2005.     

Hormone replacement therapy: one-year follow up of DNA damage

Although hormone replacement therapy (HRT) may offer considerable benefits for menopausal women, the potential cancer risk may limit its use. This work aimed at assessing whether HRT is able to induce DNA damage in postmenopausal women monitored by the micronucleus (MN) test, which provides a reliable biomarker of genotoxicity and cancer risk assessment. A group of 16 healthy women (non-smokers) in spontaneous menopause were given oral estradiol (2 mg oral micronized 17-beta estradiol daily) for 1 month, followed by a 30-day wash-out period and a transdermal treatment with 17-beta estradiol (1.5 mg gel daily) during 1 month. Oral intake of dihydrogesterone (10 mg/day for 12 days/month) was cyclically combined with oral or transdermal estradiol during the next 9 months. Venous blood samples were collected before the treatment, and after 1, 3, 6 and 12 months of therapy. Slides were scored blind and MN frequency was evaluated as number of micronuclei per 1000 binucleated cells. The baseline plasma levels of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH) and estradiol (E2) were simultaneously measured. The means of MN frequency were 18.2+/-1.6, 18.6+/-2.1, 14.8+/-1.5, 15.9+/-1.0 and 17.7+/-1.3 for samples collected before and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months, respectively. The MN frequencies at every sampling time did not statistically differ from the basal values. In addition, no statistically significant associations between MN values and hormone levels of E2 and FSH were observed throughout the entire study. This study shows the absence of any significant increase of MN frequencies in women undergoing oral and/or transdermal HRT, sequentially monitored for up to 12 months of therapy.     

Hormone replacement therapy and risk of venous thromboembolism: population based case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between use of hormone replacement therapy and the risk of idiopathic venous thromboembolism. DESIGN: Population based case-control study. SETTING: Population enrolled in the General Practice Research Database, United Kingdom. SUBJECTS: A cohort of 347,253 women aged 50 to 79 without major risk factors for venous thromboembolism was identified. Cases were 292 women admitted to hospital for a first episode of pulmonary embolism or deep venous thrombosis; 10,000 controls were randomly selected from the source cohort. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adjusted relative risks estimated from unconditional logistic regression. RESULTS: The adjusted odds ratio of venous thromboembolism for current use of hormone replacement therapy compared with non-users was 2.1 (95% confidence interval 1.4 to 3.2). This increased risk was restricted to first year users, with odds ratios of 4.6 (2.5 to 8.4) during the first six months and 3.0 (1.4 to 6.5) 6-12 months after starting treatment. No major risk differences were observed between users of low and high doses of oestrogens, unopposed and opposed treatment, and oral and transdermal preparations. The risk of idiopathic venous thromboembolism among non-users of replacement therapy was estimated to be 1.3 per 10,000 women per year. Among current users, idiopathic venous thromboembolism occurs at two to three times the rate in non-users, resulting in one to two additional cases per 10,000 women per year. CONCLUSIONS: Current use of hormone replacement therapy was associated with a higher risk of venous thromboembolism, although the risk seemed to be restricted to the first year of use.