G蛋白偶联受体失敏的分子机制

G蛋白偶联受体（GPCRs)受到激动剂持续刺激对易发生失敏。受体内化是GPCRs失敏重要分子机制。GPCRs在G蛋白产受体激酶（GRKs)、第二信使调节激酶等作用下发生磷酸化,磷酸化的GPCRs与抑制蛋白（arrestins)结合后导致受体与G蛋白失偶联,并通过胞吞由细胞膜表面向膜内转移,从而因GPCRs的内化而表现为失敏。     

孤儿G蛋白偶联受体研究进展

孤儿G蛋白偶联受体的研究意味着发现其尚未了解的内源性配体,是后基因组时代功能基因组学研究的热点之一,对生命科学的发展具有深 影响。本文介绍孤儿G蛋白偶联受体的概念、研究策略及其应用。     

植物病原丝状真菌G蛋白偶联受体的研究进展

通过对丝状真菌G蛋白偶联受体(GPCR)的结构、分类以及功能方面进行综述,以期明确丝状真菌与其他模式生物GPCR之间的关系。基于已报道的模式生物及丝状真菌等不同生物中的GPCR,通过SMART保守结构域分析,以及利用Clustal X、MEGA等软件对上述GPCR进行遗传关系分析。明确丝状真菌典型GPCR具有七跨膜结构域,新型GPCR则含有PIPK、RGS等保守结构域,明确不同学者对于GPCR的分类情况,以及新型GPCR所具有的特殊功能,明确模式生物GPCR、丝状真菌GPCR分别各自聚类。丝状真菌中GPCR的数量较模式生物少,不同分类单元中真菌之间GPCR的数量也不尽相同,同时,丝状真菌GPCR除具有典型的七跨膜结构域外,还含有一些其他保守的结构域,上述研究为进一步开展其功能研究提供重要的理论基础。     

G蛋白偶联受体二聚化研究进展

G蛋白偶联受体是细胞膜受体最大的家族,参与调节多种生理过程,在信号识别及转导中具有重要作用,传统观点认为G蛋白偶联受体作为单体起作用,近年来,越来越多的证据表明,G蛋白偶联受体不仅能以二聚体形式存在,而且在细胞信号转导中起重要作用,尤其是对阿片受体异源二聚体的研究,推动了这一领域的研究。本文综述了G蛋白偶联受体二聚化研究进展,以及同源和异源二聚体的结构与功能。     

G蛋白偶联受体激酶的调控

G蛋白偶联受体激酶(G protein-coupled receptor kinase,GRK)特异地使活化的G蛋白偶联受体(G protein-coupled receptor,GPCR)发生磷酸化及脱敏化,从而终止后者介导的信号转导通路。研究表明,GRK的功能被高度调控,并具有下行调节GPCR的能力。调控GRK功能的机制包括两个层次：(1)多种途径调控激酶的亚细胞定位及活性,包括GPCR介导、G蛋白偶联、磷脂作用、Ca^2 结合蛋白调控、蛋白激酶C活化、MAPK反馈抑制、小窝蛋白抑制等;(2)调控GRK表达水平,主要体现在其与某些疾病的联系。     

G蛋白偶联受体突变及其相关疾病

G蛋白偶联受体（GPCR）是最大的蛋白质受体超家族之一,参与调节各种生理过程,在信号识别和转导中起重要作用。GPCR的突变及基因多态性将引发各种疾病,目前已经发现有30多种单基因疾病与此相关。介绍了GPCR功能失调的分子基础,在此基础上对一些GPCR突变以及相关疾病做了综逑,并指出了其治疗意义。     

G蛋白偶联受体的研究进展

G蛋白偶联受体（GPCRs）,是体内最大的蛋白质超家族。GPCRs的基本结构巳清楚,但高分辨率的三维结构还未得到。根据结构的同源性,GPCRs主要分为A、B、C3族。GPCRs配体的多样性决定配体结合域的多样性。受体分子内相互作用力的破坏,质子化,构象变化,与G蛋白的偶联以及受体二聚化参与了GPCRs的活化过程。GPCRs的活化模式有3种;二态模式、多态模式和顺序结合的构象选择模式。     

与癌症相关的G 蛋白偶联受体及通路的研究进展

G蛋白偶联受体(G protein-coupled receptors,GPCRs)是一类重要的细胞膜表面跨膜蛋白受体超家族,具有7个跨膜螺旋结构。GPCRs的细胞内信号由G蛋白介导,可将激素、神经递质、药物、趋化因子等多种物理和化学的细胞外刺激穿过细胞膜转导到细胞内不同的效应分子,激活相应的信号级联系统进而影响恶性肿瘤的生长迁移过程。虽然目前药物市场上有很多治疗癌症的小分子药物属于G蛋白受体相关药物,但所作用的靶点集中于少数特定G蛋白偶联受体。因此,新的具有成药性的G蛋白偶联受体的开发具有很大的研究价值和市场潜力。本文主要以在癌症发生、发展中起重要作用的溶血磷脂酸(LPA),G蛋白偶联受体30(GPR30)、内皮素A受体(ETAR)等不同G蛋白偶联受体为分类依据,综述其与相关的信号通路在癌症进程中的作用,并对相应的小分子药物的临床应用和研究进展进行展望。     

与阿尔兹海默症相关的G 蛋白偶联受体研究进展

G蛋白偶联受体(GPCRs)在大脑信号传递中至关重要,而在阿尔兹海默症(AD)中,G蛋白偶联受体通过调控α-、β-及γ-分泌酶分泌、淀粉样前体蛋白(APP)生成及β-淀粉样蛋白(Aβ)降解,直接影响β-淀粉样蛋白在神经系统信号级联反应;另外,阿尔兹海默症中β-淀粉样蛋白的生成可以扰乱G蛋白偶联受体功能.因此,阐明G蛋白偶联受体与阿尔兹海默症发病之间的关联有助于开发以G蛋白偶联受体为靶点的阿尔兹海默症治疗药物.     

G蛋白偶联受体介导的神经信号跨膜转导

Ｇ蛋白偶联受体介导的神经信号跨膜转导郭君,周安武,杜雨苍（中国科学院上海生物化学研究所,上海２０００３１）关键词Ｇ蛋白偶联受体,神经信号跨膜转导受体是细胞膜或细胞内的一些首先能与生物活性物质相互作用的分子,它们能够识别配基并与其结合,然后将受体与配基...     

Stability study of the human G-protein coupled receptor, Smoothened

Smoothened is a member of the G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) family responsible for the transduction of the Hedgehog signal to the intracellular effectors of the Hedgehog signaling pathway. Aberrant regulation of this receptor is implicated in many cancers but also in neurodegenerative disorders. Despite the pharmacological relevance of this receptor, very little is known about its functional mechanism and its physiological ligand. In order to characterize this receptor for basic and pharmacological interests, we developed the expression of human Smoothened in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Smoothened was then purified. Using Surface Plasmon Resonance technology, we showed that human Smoothened was in a native conformational state and able to interact with its antagonist, the cyclopamine, both at the yeast plasma membrane and after purification. Thermostability assays on purified human Smoothened showed that this GPCR is relatively stable in the classical detergent dodecyl-β-d-maltoside (DDM). The fluorinated surfactant C₈F₁₇TAC, which has been proposed to be less aggressive towards membrane proteins than classical detergents, increased Smoothened thermostability in solution. Moreover, the replacement of a glycine by an arginine in the third intracellular loop of Smoothened coupled to the use of the fluorinated surfactant C₈F₁₇TAC during the mutant purification increased Smoothened thermostability even more. These data will be very useful for future crystallization assays and structural characterization of the human receptor Smoothened.     

Hierarchical phosphorylation of delta-opioid receptor regulates agonist-induced receptor desensitization and internalization

Treatment of HEK293 cells expressing the delta-opioid receptor with agonist [d-Pen(2,5)]enkephalin (DPDPE) resulted in the rapid phosphorylation of the receptor. We constructed several mutants of the potential phosphorylation sites (Ser/Thr) at the carboxyl tail of the receptor in order to delineate the receptor phosphorylation sites and the agonist-induced desensitization and internalization. The Ser and Thr were substituted to alanine, and the corresponding mutants were transiently and stably expressed in HEK293 cells. We found that only two residues, i.e. Thr(358) and Ser(363), were phosphorylated, with Ser(363) being critical for the DPDPE-induced phosphorylation of the receptor. Furthermore, using alanine and aspartic acid substitutions, we found that the phosphorylation of the receptor is hierarchical, with Ser(363) as the primary phosphorylation site. Here, we demonstrated that DPDPE-induced rapid receptor desensitization, as measured by adenylyl cyclase activity, and receptor internalization are intimately related to phosphorylation of Thr(358) and Ser(363), with Thr(358) being involved in the receptor internalization.     

Acute internalization of gap junctions in vascular endothelial cells in response to inflammatory mediator-induced G-protein coupled receptor activation

During the inflammatory response, activation of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) by inflammatory mediators rapidly leads to inhibition of gap junction intercellular communication (GJIC); however, the steps that lead to this inhibition are not known. Combining high-resolution fluorescence microscopy and functional assays, we found that activation of the GPCRs PAR-1 and ET_A/B by their natural inflammatory mediator agonists, thrombin and endothelin-1, resulted in rapid and acute internalization of gap junctions (GJs) that coincided with the inhibition of GJIC followed by increased vascular permeability. The endocytosis protein clathrin and the scaffold protein ZO-1 appeared to be involved in GJ internalization, and ZO-1 was partially displaced from GJs during the internalization process. These findings demonstrate that GJ internalization is an efficient mechanism for modulating GJIC in inflammatory response.     

The role of G-protein coupled receptors and associated proteins in receptor tyrosine kinase signal transduction

It is well established that stimulation of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) can activate signalling from receptor tyrosine kinases by a process termed transactivation. Indeed, in recent years, it has become apparent that transactivation is a general phenomenon that has been demonstrated for many unrelated GPCRs and receptor tyrosine kinases. In this case the GPCR/G-protein participation is up-stream of the receptor tyrosine kinase. Substantial research has addressed these findings but meanwhile another mechanism of cross talk has been slowly emerging. For over a decade, a growing body of evidence has demonstrated that numerous growth factors use G-proteins and attendant signalling molecules such as beta-arrestins that participate down-stream of the receptor tyrosine kinase to signal to effectors, such as p42/p44 MAPK. This review highlights this novel mechanism of cross talk between receptor tyrosine kinases and GPCRs, which is distinct from growth factor receptor transactivation by GPCRs.     

The study of G-protein coupled receptor oligomerization with computational modeling and bioinformatics

To achieve a structural context for the analysis of G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) oligomers, molecular modeling must be used to predict the corresponding interaction interfaces. The task is complicated by the paucity of detailed structural data at atomic resolution, and the large number of possible modes in which the bundles of seven transmembrane (TM) segments of the interacting GPCR monomers can be packed together into dimers and/or higher-order oligomers. Approaches and tools offered by bioinformatics can be used to reduce the complexity of this task and, combined with computational modeling, can serve to yield testable predictions for the structural properties of oligomers. Most of the bioinformatics methods take advantage of the evolutionary relation that exists among GPCRs, as expressed in their sequences and measurable in the common elements of their structural and functional features. These common elements are responsible for the presence of detectable patterns of motifs and correlated mutations evident from the alignment of the sequences of these complex biological systems. The decoding of these patterns in terms of structural and functional determinants can provide indications about the most likely interfaces of dimerization/oligomerization of GPCRs. We review here the main approaches from bioinformatics, enhanced by computational molecular modeling, that have been used to predict likely interfaces of dimerization/oligomerization of GPCRs, and compare results from their application to rhodopsin-like GPCRs. A compilation of the most frequently predicted GPCR oligomerization interfaces points to specific regions of TMs 4-6.     

Adaptive evolution of G-protein coupled receptor genes

The phylogeny and patterns of nucleotide substitutions in the visual pigment genes, adrenergic receptor genes, muscarinic receptor genes, and in the human mas oncogene were studied by comparing their DNA sequences. The evolutionary tree obtained shows that the visual pigment genes and mas oncogene form one cluster and that the receptor genes form another. In the evolution of rhodopsin genes, synonymous substitutions outnumber nonsynonymous substitutions. This is consistent with the neutral theory of molecular evolution. However, the early evolutionary stages of alpha- and beta-adrenergic and muscarinic receptors are notable for significantly more nonsynonymous substitutions than synonymous substitutions, suggesting the acquisition of novel functional adaptations. Variable rates of nonsynonymous changes in different domains of these proteins reveal DNA segments that might have been important in their functional adaptations.      

细胞外钙受体相互作用蛋白的研究进展

细胞外钙受体(CaR)为G蛋白偶联受体超家族中的成员,它的大部分作用是以Gαi,Gαq和Gα12/13为中介的,但由G蛋白α亚基介导的作用并不能完全解释CaR的生物学效应.与CaR相互作用蛋白如抑制蛋白、G蛋白受体激酶、受体激活修饰蛋白、丝蛋白、钾通道、小窝蛋白等结构和信号蛋白赋予CaR独特的信号转导特征,并能够更充分说明CaR在不同组织和细胞中所发挥的作用.本文将对上述几种与其相互作用蛋白及它们所产生的生物学效应做一综述.     

Go G-proteins mediate rapid heterologous desensitization of G-protein coupled receptors in Xenopus oocytes

We have shown previously that responses to lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) in Xenopus oocytes exhibit pronounced rapid homologous desensitization mediated by Go family of G-proteins (Itzhaki-Van Ham et al., 2004, J Cell Physiol, 200: 125-133). The present study was aimed at examining the involvement of Go G-proteins in rapid heterologous desensitization of native and expressed G-protein-coupled receptors in Xenopus oocytes. Threshold stimulation of the native lysophosphatidic acid receptors (LPA-Rs) induced about 50% rapid desensitization of responses evoked by stimulation of either native trypsin or expressed M1-muscarinic cholinergic receptors (M1-Rs). Similarly, threshold stimulation of expressed M1-Rs or thyrotropin-releasing hormone receptors induced 40% rapid desensitization of responses to LPA. Inactivation of all Gi/o G-proteins with pertussis toxin (PTX) completely abolished rapid heterologous desensitization in all protocols. Depletion of either Galphao or Galphao1 by antisense oligodeoxynucleotides targeted at either member of the Galphao family decreased or completely abolished rapid heterologous desensitization. Expression of two dominant negative mutants of the human Galphao family, highly homologous to oocyte Galphao species, either decreased or virtually abolished rapid desensitization. Homologous and heterologous desensitizations of the LPA response were non-additive and proceeded, apparently, via the same pathway. We conclude that Go G-proteins mediate both homologous and heterologous rapid desensitization of responses mediated by G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) coupled to the phosphoinositide phospholipase C-inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate-Ca(2+) (PI-PLC-InsP(3)-Ca(2+)) pathway in Xenopus oocytes.     

Mu-opioid receptor desensitization: role of receptor phosphorylation,internalization, and representation

It is generally accepted that the internalization and desensitization of mu-opioid receptor (MOR) involves receptor phosphorylation and beta-arrestin recruitment. However, a mutant MOR, which is truncated after the amino acid residue Ser363 (MOR363D), was found to undergo phosphorylation-independent internalization and desensitization. As expected, MOR363D, missing the putative agonist-induced phosphorylation sites, did not exhibit detectable agonist-induced phosphorylation. MOR363D underwent slower internalization as reflected in the attenuation of membrane translocation of beta-arrestin 2 when compared with wild type MOR, but the level of receptor being internalized was similar to that of wild type MOR after 4 h of etorphine treatment. Furthermore, MOR363D was observed to desensitize faster than that of wild type MOR upon agonist activation. Surface biotinylation assay demonstrated that the wild type receptors recycled back to membrane after agonist-induced internalization, which contributed to the receptor resensitization and thus partially reversed the receptor desensitization. On the contrary, MOR363D did not recycle after internalization. Hence, MOR desensitization is controlled by the receptor internalization and the recycling of internalized receptor to cell surface in an active state. Taken together, our data indicated that receptor phosphorylation is not absolutely required in the internalization, but receptor phosphorylation and subsequent beta-arrestin recruitment play important roles in the resensitization of internalized receptors.     

Sequence alignment of the G-protein coupled receptor superfamily.

The multitude of G-protein coupled receptor (GPR) superfamily cDNAs recently isolated has exceeded the number of receptor subtypes anticipated by pharmacological studies. Analysis of the sequence similarities and unique features of the members of this family is valuable for designing strategies to isolate related cDNAs, for developing hypotheses concerning substrate-ligand and receptor-effector interactions, and for understanding the evolution of these genes. We have compiled and aligned the 74 unique amino acid sequences published to date and review the present understanding of the structural motifs contributing to ligand binding and G-protein coupling.