Glycine-alanine repeats impair proper substrate unfolding by the proteasome

Proteasome ATPases unravel folded proteins. Introducing a sequence containing only glycine and alanine residues (GAr) into substrates can impair their digestion. We previously proposed that a GAr interferes with the unfolding capacity of the proteasome, leading to partial degradation of products. Here we tested that idea in several ways. Stabilizing or destabilizing a folded domain within substrate proteins changed GAr-mediated intermediate production in the way predicted by the model. A downstream folded domain determined the sites of terminal proteolysis. The spacing between a GAr and a folded domain was critical for intermediate production. Intermediates containing a GAr did not remain associated with proteasomes, excluding models whereby retained GAr-containing proteins halt further processing. The following model is supported: a GAr positioned within the ATPase ring reduces the efficiency of coupling between nucleotide hydrolysis and work performed on the substrate. If this impairment takes place when unfolding must be initiated, insertion pauses and proteolysis is limited to the portion of the substrate that has already entered the catalytic chamber of the proteasome.     

Gly-Ala repeats induce position- and substrate-specific regulation of 26 S proteasome-dependent partial processing

Partial degradation or regulated ubiquitin proteasome-dependent processing by the 26 S proteasome has been demonstrated, but the underlying molecular mechanisms and the prevalence of this phenomenon remain obscure. Here we show that the Gly-Ala repeat (GAr) sequence of EBNA1 affects processing of substrates via the ubiquitin-dependent degradation pathway in a substrate- and position-specific fashion. GAr-mediated increase in stability of proteins targeted for degradation via the 26 S proteasome was associated with a fraction of the substrates being partially processed and the release of the free GAr. The GAr did not cause a problem for the proteolytic activity of the proteasome, and its fusion to the N terminus of p53 resulted in an increase in the rate of degradation of the entire chimera. Interestingly the GAr had little effect on the stability of EBNA1 protein itself, and targeting EBNA1 for 26 S proteasome-dependent degradation led to its complete degradation. Taken together, our data suggest a model in which the GAr prevents degradation or promotes endoproteolytic processing of substrates targeted for the 26 S proteasome by interfering with the initiation step of substrate unfolding. These results will help to further understand the underlying mechanisms for partial proteasome-dependent degradation.     

26 S proteasome-mediated production of an authentic major histocompatibility class I-restricted epitope from an intact protein substrate.

Peptides displayed on the cell surface by major histocompatibility class I molecules (MHC class I) are generated by proteolytic processing of protein-antigens in the cytoplasm. Initially, antigens are degraded by the 26 S proteasome, most probably following ubiquitination. However, it is unclear whether this proteolysis results in the generation of MHC class I ligands or if further processing is required. To investigate the role of the 26 S proteasome in antigen presentation, we analyzed the processing of an intact antigen by purified 26 S proteasome. A recombinant ornithine decarboxylase was produced harboring the H-2K(b)-restricted peptide epitope, derived from ovalbumin SIINFEKL (termed ODC-ova). Utilizing recombinant antizyme to target the antigen to the 26 S proteasome, we found that proteolysis of ODC-ova by the 26 S proteasome resulted in the generation of the K(b)-ligand. Mass spectrometry analysis indicated that in addition to SIINFEKL, the N-terminally extended ligand, HSIINFEKL, was also generated. Production of SIINFEKL was linear with time and directly proportional to the rate of ODC-ova degradation. The overall yield of SIINFEKL was approximately 5% of the amount of ODC-ova degraded. The addition of PA28, the 20 S, or the 20 S-PA28 complex to the 26 S proteasome did not significantly affect the yield of the antigenic peptide. These findings demonstrate that the 26 S proteasome can efficiently digest an intact physiological substrate and generate an authentic MHC class I-restricted epitope.     

Proteasomes begin ornithine decarboxylase digestion at the C terminus

Proteasomes denature folded protein substrates and thread them through a narrow pore that leads to the sequestered sites of proteolysis. Whether a protein substrate initiates insertion from its N or C terminus or in a random orientation has not been determined for any natural substrate. We used the labile enzyme ornithine decarboxylase (ODC), which is recognized by the proteasome via a 37-residue C-terminal tag, to answer this question. Three independent approaches were used to assess orientation as follows. 1) The 461-residue ODC protein chain was interrupted at position 305. The C-terminal fragment was degraded by purified proteasomes, but because processivity requires continuity of the polypeptide chain, the N-terminal fragment was spared. 2) A proteasome-inhibitory viral sequence prevented degradation when introduced near the C terminus but not when inserted elsewhere in ODC. 3) A bulky tightly folded protein obstructed in vivo degradation most effectively when positioned near the C terminus. These data demonstrate that the proteasome initiates degradation of this native substrate at the C terminus. The co-localization of entry site and degradation tag to the ODC C terminus suggests that recognition tags determine the site for initiating entry. Flexibility of a polypeptide terminus may promote the initiation of degradation.     

Deubiquitination by proteasome is coordinated with substrate translocation for proteolysis in vivo

The 26S proteasome mediates degradation of protein substrates labeled with polyUb chains. After recognition by the 19S proteasome regulatory complex, polyUb chains are disassembled and substrates are processed in the 20S core of proteasome. However, the exact relationship of degradation-associated deubiquitination to substrate processing remains unclear. Here, using Ub-based tagging strategies, we provided evidence that removable polyUb chains serve as the signal for proteolytic processing of ubiquitinated substrates. We showed that inhibition of the proteasome by proteasome inhibitor MG132 results in trapping of the substrate in the proteasome. Such a trapping allows proteasomal cleavage of attached non-removable Ub mutant (UbV75,76), which is otherwise a "difficult" deubiquitination substrate. Characterization of deubiquitination and degradation intermediates, generated due to incomplete proteolytic inhibition, revealed changes in proteolytic cleavage sites, within the Gal4-VP16 model substrate, suggesting that the copy number of attached UbV75,76 affects substrate processing. Conversion of lysine48 to arginine48 in UbV75,76 did not have significant effect on in vivo polyubiquitination of multiple Ub-fused substrates, but considerably reduced proteolytic intermediates. Taken together, the results support a model in which deubiquitination process is a crucial event for proteolysis of ubiquitinated substrates and such an event is coordinated with substrate translocation.     

Feeding the machine: mechanisms of proteasome-catalyzed degradation of ubiquitinated proteins

The proteasome plays a role in a myriad of intracellular processes from cell-cycle control to antigen presentation. Central to these processes is the targeting of selected proteins for proteasomal degradation via their conjugation to ubiquitin. The mechanisms by which the ubiquitin-dependent proteasomal proteolysis occurs can be divided into four steps: first, substrate protein recognition by its cognate E3 ubiquitin ligase; second, polyubiquitinated protein substrate recruitment to the proteasome; third, protein substrate deubiquitination; and four, proteolytic chamber pore opening/substrate translocation followed by proteolysis. Recent advances include the identification of novel E3 ubiquitin ligase recognition determinants, a new isopeptidase activity, and a better understanding of how the proteasome's axial channels are gated.     

Proteasome substrate degradation requires association plus extended peptide

To determine the minimum requirements for substrate recognition and processing by proteasomes, the functional elements of a ubiquitin-independent degradation tag were dissected. The 37-residue C-terminus of ornithine decarboxylase (cODC) is a native degron, which also functions when appended to diverse proteins. Mutating the cysteine 441 residue within cODC impaired its proteasome association in the context of ornithine decarboxylase and prevented the turnover of GFP-cODC in yeast cells. Degradation of GFP-cODC with C441 mutations was restored by providing an alternate proteasome association element via fusion to the Rpn10 proteasome subunit. However, Rpn10-GFP was stable, unless extended by cODC or other peptides of similar size. In vitro reconstitution experiments confirmed the requirement for both proteasome tethering and a loosely structured region. Therefore, cODC and degradation tags in general must serve two functions: proteasome association and a site, consisting of an extended peptide region, used for initiating insertion into the protease.     

S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase degradation by the 26 S proteasome is accelerated by substrate-mediated transamination

The short-lived enzyme S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase uses a covalently bound pyruvoyl cofactor to catalyze the formation of decarboxylated S-adenosylmethionine, which then donates an aminopropyl group for polyamine biosynthesis. Here we demonstrate that S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase is ubiquitinated and degraded by the 26 S proteasome in vivo, a process that is accelerated by inactivation of S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase by substrate-mediated transamination of its pyruvoyl cofactor. Proteasome inhibition in COS-7 cells prevents the degradation of S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase antigen; however, even brief inhibition of the 26 S proteasome caused substantial losses of S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase activity despite accumulation of S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase antigen. Levels of the enzyme's substrate (S-adenosylmethionine) increased rapidly after 26 S proteasome inhibition, and this increase in substrate level is consistent with the observed loss of activity arising from an increased rate of inactivation by substrate-mediated transamination. Evidence is also presented that this substrate-mediated transamination accelerates normal degradation of S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase, as the rate of degradation of the enzyme was increased in the presence of AbeAdo (5'-([(Z)-4-amino-2-butenyl]methylamino]-5'-deoxyadenosine) (a substrate analogue that transaminates the enzyme); conversely, when the intracellular substrate level was reduced by methionine deprivation, the rate of degradation of the enzyme was decreased. Ubiquitination of S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase is demonstrated by isolation of His-tagged AdoMetDC (S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase) from COS-7 cells co-transfected with hemagglutinin-tagged ubiquitin and showing bands that were immunoreactive to both anti-AdoMetDC antibody and anti-hemagglutinin antibody. This is the first study to demonstrate that AdoMetDC is ubiquitinated and degraded by the 26 S proteasome, and substrate-mediated acceleration of degradation is a unique finding.     

Remodeling of the epitope repertoire of a candidate idiotype vaccine by targeting to lysosomal degradation in dendritic cells

The generation of efficacious vaccines against self-antigens expressed in tumor cells requires breakage of tolerance, and the refocusing of immune responses toward epitopes for which tolerance may not be established. While the presentation of tumor antigens by mature dendritic cells (mDC) may surpass tolerance, broadening of the antigenic repertoire remains an issue. We report that fusion of the candidate idiotype vaccine IGKV3-20 to the Gly-Ala repeat (GAr) of the Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen (EBNA)-1 inhibits degradation by the proteasome and redirects processing to the lysosome. mDCs transduced with a recombinant lentivirus encoding the chimeric idiotype efficiently primed CD4+ and CD8+ cytotoxic T-cell (CTL) responses that lysed autologous blasts expressing IGKV3-20 or pulsed with IGKV3-20 synthetic peptides, and HLA-matched IGKV3-20-positive tumor cell lines. Comparison of the cytotoxic response of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes activated by mDCs expressing the wild-type or chimeric IGKV3-20 reveled largely non-overlapping epitope repertoires in both CD4+ and CD8+ effectors. Thus, fusion to the GAr may provide an effective means to broaden the immune response to an endogenous protein by promoting the presentation of antigenic epitopes that require a lysosome-dependent processing step.     

Discrimination between ubiquitin-dependent and ubiquitin-independent proteolytic pathways by the 26S proteasome subunit 5a.

The 26S proteasome subunit 5a binds polyubiquitin chains and has previously been shown to inhibit the degradation of mitotic cyclins. Presumably inhibition results from S5a binding and preventing recognition of Ub-cyclin conjugates by the 26S proteasome. Here we show that S5a does not inhibit the degradation of full-length ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) consistent with previous reports that the enzyme is degraded in an antizyme-dependent, but ubiquitin-independent reaction. S5a does, however, inhibit degradation of short ODC translation products generated by internal initiation events. Because in vitro translation often produces some shortened products, the existence of ubiquitin conjugated to a 35S-labeled protein is not necessarily evidence that the full-length protein is a substrate of the Ub-dependent proteolytic pathway.     

Immunochemical demonstration of increased accumulation of ornithine decarboxylase in rat liver after partial hepatectomy and growth hormone induction

Antiserum against ornithine decarboxylase (EC 4.1.1.17) was prepared in rabbits using purified ornithine decarboxylase from rat liver as the antigen. Immunoglobulins from the immune sera were covalently coupled to agarose by cyanogen bromide activation. With the aid of this immunoadsorbent against the enzyme it has been shown that following partial hepatectomy and growth hormone administration, the ornithine decarboxylase activity is elevated concomitantly with the increase in the immunoreactive enzyme protein. In addition, the rapid decay in ornithine decarboxylase activity in regenerating rat liver after cycloheximide injection is accompanied by a decrease in the immunoreactive protein. These results suggest that the activity of ornithine decarboxylase in rat liver is regulated through rapid changes in de novo synthesis and degradation of the enzyme protein.     

The role of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway in MHC class I antigen processing: implications for vaccine design

Proteasomes are multisubunit enzyme complexes that reside in the cytoplasm and nucleus of eukaryotic cells. By selective protein degradation, proteasomes regulate many cellular processes including MHC class I antigen processing. Three constitutively expressed catalytic subunits are responsible for proteasome mediated proteolysis. These subunits are exchanged for three homologous subunits, the immunosubunits, in IFNgamma-exposed cells and in cells with specialized antigen presenting function. Both constitutive and immunoproteasomes degrade endogenous proteins into small peptide fragments that can bind to MHC class I molecules for presentation on the cell surface to cytotoxic T lymphocytes. However, immunoproteasomes seem to fulfill this function more efficiently. IFNgamma further induces the expression of a proteasome activator, PA28, which can also enhance antigenic peptide production by proteasomes. In this review, we will introduce the ubiquitin-proteasome system and summarize recent findings regarding the role of the IFNgamma-inducible proteasome subunits and proteasome regulators in antigen processing. We review the different ways by which tumors and viruses have been found to target the proteasome system to avoid MHC class I presentation of their antigens, and discuss recent progressions in the development of computer assisted approaches to predict CTL epitopes within larger protein sequences, based on proteasome cleavage specificity. The availability of such programs as well as a general insight into the proteasome mediated steps in MHC class I antigen processing provides us with a rational basis for the design of new antiviral and anticancer T cell vaccines.     

Regulation of cellular polyamines by antizyme

Proteins that are degraded by the proteasome are first modified by a set of enzymes that attach multiple copies of ubiquitin to substrate lysines, but a tiny minority, including the polyamine-synthesizing enzyme ornithine decarboxylase, is handled differently. This enzyme is targeted for destruction by another protein--antizyme. Why does ornithine decarboxylase have its own dedicated destruction mechanism, how does it work, and is it the only protein to be targeted to the proteasome in this way?     

Slippery Substrates Impair ATP-dependent Protease Function by Slowing Unfolding

ATP-dependent proteases are responsible for most energy-dependent protein degradation across all species. Proteases initially bind an unstructured region on a substrate and then translocate along the polypeptide chain, unfolding and degrading protein domains as they are encountered. Although this process is normally processive, resulting in the complete degradation of substrate proteins to small peptides, some substrates are released prematurely. Regions of low sequence complexity within the substrate such as the glycine-rich region (GRR) from p105 or glycine-alanine repeats (GAr) from the EBNA1 (Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen-1) protein, can trigger partial degradation and fragment release. Loss of processivity could be due to inability to hold on to the substrate (faster release) or inability to unfold and degrade a substrate domain (slower unfolding). I previously showed that the GRR slows domain unfolding by the proteasome (Kraut, D. A., Israeli, E., Schrader, E. K., Patil, A., Nakai, K., Nanavati, D., Inobe, T., and Matouschek, A. (2012) ACS Chem. Biol. 7, 1444–1453). In contrast, a recently published study concluded that GArs increase the rate of substrate release from ClpXP, a bacterial ATP-dependent protease (Too, P. H., Erales, J., Simen, J. D., Marjanovic, A., and Coffino, P. (2013) J. Biol. Chem. 288, 13243–13257). Here, I show that these apparently contradictory results can be reconciled through a reanalysis of the ClpXP GAr data. This reanalysis shows that, as with the proteasome, low complexity sequences in substrates slow their unfolding and degradation by ClpXP, with little effect on release rates. Thus, despite their evolutionary distance and limited sequence identity, both ClpXP and the proteasome share a common mechanism by which substrate sequences regulate the processivity of degradation.     

Polyamines regulate their synthesis by inducing expression and blocking degradation of ODC antizyme

Polyamines are essential organic cations with multiple cellular functions. Their synthesis is controlled by a feedback regulation whose main target is ornithine decarboxylase (ODC), the rate-limiting enzyme in polyamine biosynthesis. In mammals, ODC has been shown to be inhibited and targeted for ubiquitin-independent degradation by ODC antizyme (AZ). The synthesis of mammalian AZ was reported to involve a polyamine-induced ribosomal frameshifting mechanism. High levels of polyamine therefore inhibit new synthesis of polyamines by inducing ODC degradation. We identified a previously unrecognized sequence in the genome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae encoding an orthologue of mammalian AZ. We show that synthesis of yeast AZ (Oaz1) involves polyamine-regulated frameshifting as well. Degradation of yeast ODC by the proteasome depends on Oaz1. Using this novel model system for polyamine regulation, we discovered another level of its control. Oaz1 itself is subject to ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis by the proteasome. Degradation of Oaz1, however, is inhibited by polyamines. We propose a model, in which polyamines inhibit their ODC-mediated biosynthesis by two mechanisms, the control of Oaz1 synthesis and inhibition of its degradation.     

Degradation signals in ErbB-2 dictate proteasomal processing and immunogenicity and resist protection by cis glycine-alanine repeat.

ErbB-2 is ubiquitinated and degraded when dissociated from its membrane chaperone or bound by specific antibody. Reagents which induce such degradation have demonstrated antitumor activity and may impact ErbB-2 immunogenicity. To further understand ErbB-2 degradation and immunogenicity, a glycine-alanine repeat (GAr) or the reverse proline-alanine repeat (PAr) which protects certain proteins from proteasome degradation, was inserted after amino acid 5 (GAr5/PAr5) or 55 (GAr55/PAr55) of ErbB-2. When dissociated from the membrane with geldanamycin, E2-GAr5 and E2-PAr5 were not protected and still ubiquitinated and degraded by the proteasome, despite the presence of GAr. Insertional mutagenesis with GAr sequences at a.a. 55 of E2 enhanced proteasome degradation rendering E2-GAr55 and E2-PAr55 unstable on the membrane, but rescued in the cytosol by proteasome inhibitors. Immunization with E2-GAr induced antitumor immunity and CTL which lysed tumor cells expressing chimeric E2-GAr or wild-type E2 proteins, demonstrating efficient presentation through MHC I pathway. Improved understanding of the strong degradation signals in ErbB-2 may facilitate the development of anticancer agents or vaccines.     

Inhibition of phorbol ester-caused synthesis of mouse epidermal ornithine decarboxylase by retinoic acid

The mechanisms by which topically applied retinoic acid to mouse skin inhibits tumor promoter 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate (TPA)-induced epidermal ornithine decarboxylase activity were analyzed. Retinoic acid inhibition of the induction of epidermal ornithine decarboxylic activity was not the result of nonspecific cytotoxicity, production of a soluble inhibitor of ornithine decarboxylase, or direct effect on its activity. In addition, inhibition of TPA-caused increased ornithine decarboxylase activity does not appear to be due to enhanced degradation and/or post-translational modification of ornithine decarboxylase by transglutaminase-mediated putrescine incorporation. We found that retinoic acid inhibits the synthesis of ornithine decarboxylase caused by TPA. Application of 10 nmol TPA to mouse skin led to a dramatic induction of epidermal ornithine decarboxylase activity which was paralled by increased [3H]difluoromethylornithine binding and an increased incorporation of [35S]methionine into the enzyme. Application of 17 nmol retinoic acid 1 h prior to application of 10 nmol TPA to skin resulted in inhibition of the induction of activity which accompanied inhibition of [3H]difluoromethylornithine binding and [35S]methionine incorporation into ornithine decarboxylase protein as determined by the tube-gel electrophoresis of the enzyme immunoprecipitated with monoclonal antibodies to it. Inhibition of ornithine decarboxylase synthesis was not the result of the inhibitory effect of retinoic acid on general protein synthesis. The results indicate that retinoic acid possibly inhibits TPA-caused synthesis of ornithine decarboxylase protein selectively.     

In vitro study of proteolytic degradation of rat histidine decarboxylase.

Mammalian ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) is a very unstable protein which is degraded in an ATP-dependent manner by proteasome 26S, after making contact with the regulatory protein antizyme. PEST regions are sequences described as signals for protein degradation. The C-terminal PEST region of mammalian ODC is essential for its degradation by proteasome 26S. Mammalian histidine decarboxylase (HDC) is also a short-lived protein. The full primary sequence of mammalian HDC contains PEST-regions at both the N- and C-termini. Rat ODC and different truncated and full versions of rat HDC were expressed in vitro. In vitro degradation of rat ODC and rat 1-512 HDC were compared. Like ODC, rat 1-512 HDC is degraded mainly by an ATP-dependent mechanism. However, antizyme has no effect on the degradation of 1-512 HDC. The use of the inhibitors MG-132 and lactacystine significantly inhibited the degradation of 1-512 HDC, suggesting that a ubiquitin-dependent, proteasome 26S proteolytic pathway is involved. Results obtained with the different modifications of rat HDC containing all three PEST regions (full version, 1-656 HDC), only the N-terminal PEST region (1-512 HDC), or no PEST region (69-512 HDC), indicate that the N-terminal (1-69) fragment, but not the C-terminal fragment, determines that the HDC protein is a proteasome substrate in vitro.