Visualizing adenosine-to-inosine RNA editing in the Drosophila nervous system

Informational recoding by adenosine-to-inosine RNA editing diversifies neuronal proteomes by chemically modifying structured mRNAs. However, techniques for analyzing editing activity on substrates in defined neurons in vivo are lacking. Guided by comparative genomics, here we reverse-engineered a fluorescent reporter sensitive to Drosophila melanogaster adenosine deaminase that acts on RNA (dADAR) activity and alterations in dADAR autoregulation. Using this artificial dADAR substrate, we visualized variable patterns of RNA-editing activity in the Drosophila nervous system between individuals. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of structurally mimicking ADAR substrates as a method to regulate protein expression and, potentially, therapeutically repair mutant mRNAs. Our data suggest variable RNA editing as a credible molecular mechanism for mediating individual-to-individual variation in neuronal physiology and behavior.     

Solution structure of the N-terminal dsRBD of Drosophila ADAR and interaction studies with RNA

Adenosine deaminases that act on RNA (ADAR) catalyze adenosine to inosine (A-to-I) editing in double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) substrates. Inosine is read as guanosine by the translation machinery; therefore A-to-I editing events in coding sequences may result in recoding genetic information. Whereas vertebrates have two catalytically active enzymes, namely ADAR1 and ADAR2, Drosophila has a single ADAR protein (dADAR) related to ADAR2. The structural determinants controlling substrate recognition and editing of a specific adenosine within dsRNA substrates are only partially understood. Here, we report the solution structure of the N-terminal dsRNA binding domain (dsRBD) of dADAR and use NMR chemical shift perturbations to identify the protein surface involved in RNA binding. Additionally, we show that Drosophila ADAR edits the R/G site in the mammalian GluR-2 pre-mRNA which is naturally modified by both ADAR1 and ADAR2. We then constructed a model showing how dADAR dsRBD1 binds to the GluR-2 R/G stem-loop. This model revealed that most side chains interacting with the RNA sugar-phosphate backbone need only small displacement to adapt for dsRNA binding and are thus ready to bind to their dsRNA target. It also predicts that dADAR dsRBD1 would bind to dsRNA with less sequence specificity than dsRBDs of ADAR2. Altogether, this study gives new insights into dsRNA substrate recognition by Drosophila ADAR.     

A-to-I RNA editing modulates the pharmacology of neuronal ion channels and receptors

The regulation of neuronal excitability is complex, as ion channels and neurotransmitter receptors are underlying a large variety of modulating effects. Alterations in the expression patterns of receptors or channel subunits as well as differential splicing contribute to the regulation of neuronal excitability. RNA editing is another and more recently explored mechanism to increase protein diversity, as the genomic recoding leads to new gene products with novel functional and pharmacological properties. In humans A-to-I RNA editing targets several neuronal receptors and channels, including GluR2/5/6 subunits, the Kv1.1 channel, and the 5-HT_2C receptor. Our review summarizes that RNA editing of these proteins does not only change protein function, but also the pharmacology and presumably the drug therapy in human diseases.     

人A-to-I RNA编辑事件对外显子剪接增强子潜在影响的生物信息学分析

目的:研究人A-to-I RNA编辑事件对外显子剪接增强子(ESE)的潜在影响。方法:搜集文献报道的人A-to-I RNA编辑位点,并筛选包含有A-to-I RNA编辑位点的ESE,分析人A-to-I RNA编辑前后单碱基变化对ESE的潜在影响。结果:3640个A-to-I RNA编辑位点可能使其所在的ESE功能发生潜在改变;A-to-I RNA编辑事件对不同类型ESE的潜在影响不同。结论:A-to-I RNA编辑事件可能潜在影响ESE的功能,对ESE的潜在影响为量的调节,而非质的改变。     

Edit, cut and paste in the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor gene family of Drosophila melanogaster

Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) are important for fast synaptic cholinergic transmission. They are targets of drugs/chemicals for human and animal health as well as for pest control. With the advent of genome sequencing, entire nAChR gene families have now been described for vertebrates and invertebrates. Mostly, these are extensive with a large number of distinct subunits, making possible many nAChR subtypes differing in transmitter affinity, channel conductance, ion selectivity, desensitization, modulation and pharmacology. The smallest nAChR gene family to date is that of the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, with only 10 members. This apparently compact family belies its true diversity as 4 of the 10 subunits show alternative splicing. Also, using Drosophila, A-to-I pre-mRNA editing has been demonstrated for the first time in nAChRs. Such is the extent of this variation, that one subunit alone (Dalpha6) can potentially generate far more isoforms than seen in entire gene families from other species. We present here three-dimensional models constructed for insect nAChRs, which show that many variations introduced by alternative splicing and RNA editing may influence receptor function.     

Regulation of ion channel/neurotransmitter receptor function by RNA editing

RNA editing by select adenosine deamination (A-to-I editing) alters functional determinants in certain ion channels and neurotransmitter receptors in vertebrates and invertebrates. In most cases, edited and unedited versions of a given receptor/channel co-exist to expand the functional space of the receptor population. Recent studies have characterized K(+) channels in squid that are edited at multiple positions, revealed a role for Q/R site editing in AMPA receptor assembly, and demonstrated a link between serotonin levels and the extent of editing of a mammalian serotonin receptor.     

ADAR-mediated RNA editing in non-coding RNA sequences

Adenosine to inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing is the most abundant editing event in animals. It converts adenosine to inosine in double-stranded RNA regions through the action of the adenosine deaminase acting on RNA (ADAR) proteins. Editing of pre-mRNA coding regions can alter the protein codon and increase functional diversity. However, most of the A-to-I editing sites occur in the non-coding regions of pre-mRNA or mRNA and non-coding RNAs. Untranslated regions (UTRs) and introns are located in pre-mRNA non-coding regions, thus A-to-I editing can influence gene expression by nuclear retention, degradation, alternative splicing, and translation regulation. Non-coding RNAs such as microRNA (miRNA), small interfering RNA (siRNA) and long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) are related to pre-mRNA splicing, translation, and gene regulation. A-to-I editing could therefore affect the stability, biogenesis, and target recognition of non-coding RNAs. Finally, it may influence the function of non-coding RNAs, resulting in regulation of gene expression. This review focuses on the function of ADAR-mediated RNA editing on mRNA non-coding regions (UTRs and introns) and non-coding RNAs (miRNA, siRNA, and lncRNA).