The F plasmid-encoded TraM protein stimulates relaxosome-mediated cleavage at oriT through an interaction with TraI

Conjugative DNA transfer is a highly conserved process for the direct transfer of DNA from a donor to a recipient. The conjugative initiator proteins are key players in the DNA processing reactions that initiate DNA transfer - they introduce a site- and strand-specific break in the DNA backbone via a transesterification that leaves the initiator protein covalently bound on the 5'-end of the cleaved DNA strand. The action of the initiator protein at the origin of transfer (oriT) is governed by auxiliary proteins that alter the architecture of the DNA molecule, allowing binding of the initiator protein. In the F plasmid system, two auxiliary proteins have roles in establishing the relaxosome: the host-encoded IHF and the plasmid-encoded TraY. Together, these proteins direct the loading of TraI which contains the catalytic centre for the transesterification. The F-oriT sequence includes a binding site for another plasmid-encoded protein, TraM, which is required for DNA transfer. Here the impact of TraM protein on the formation and activity of the F plasmid relaxosome has been examined. Purified TraM stimulates the formation of relaxed DNA in a reaction that requires the minimal components of the relaxosome, TraI, TraY and IHF. Unlike TraY and IHF, TraM is not essential for the formation of the relaxosome in vitro and TraM cannot substitute for either TraY or IHF in this process. The TraM binding site sbmC, along with both IHF binding sites, is essential for stimulation of the relaxase reaction. In addition, stimulation of transesterification appears to require the C-terminal domain of TraI suggesting that TraM and TraI may interact through this domain on TraI. Taken together, these results provide additional evidence of a role for TraM as a component of the relaxosome, suggest a previously unknown interaction between TraI and TraM, and allow us to propose a molecular role for the C-terminal domain of TraI.     

Transfer protein TraY of plasmid R1 stimulates TraI-catalyzed oriT cleavage in vivo

The effect of TraY protein on TraI-catalyzed strand scission at the R1 transfer origin (oriT) in vivo was investigated. As expected, the cleavage reaction was not detected in Escherichia coli cells expressing tral and the integration host factor (IHF) in the absence of other transfer proteins. The TraM dependence of strand scission was found to be inversely correlated with the presence of TraY. Thus, the TraY and TraM proteins could each enhance cleaving activity at oriT in the absence of the other. In contrast, no detectable intracellular cleaving activity was exhibited by TraI in an IHF mutant strain despite the additional presence of both TraM and TraY. An essential role for IHF in this reaction in vivo is, therefore, implied. Mobilization experiments employing recombinant R1 oriT constructions and a heterologous conjugative helper plasmid were used to investigate the independent contributions of TraY and TraM to the R1 relaxosome during bacterial conjugation. In accordance with earlier observations, traY was dispensable for mobilization in the presence of traM, but mobilization did not occur in the absence of both traM and traY. Interestingly, although the cleavage assays demonstrate that TraM and TraY independently promote strand scission in vivo, TraM remained essential for mobilization of the R1 origin even in the presence of TraY. These findings suggest that, whereas TraY and TraM function may overlap to a certain extent in the R1 relaxosome, TraM additionally performs a second function that is essential for successful conjugative transmission of plasmid DNA.     

Quorum sensing in Rhizobium sp. strain NGR234 regulates conjugal transfer (tra) gene expression and influences growth rate

Rhizobium sp. strain NGR234 forms symbiotic, nitrogen-fixing nodules on a wide range of legumes via functions largely encoded by the plasmid pNGR234a. The pNGR234a sequence revealed a region encoding plasmid replication (rep) and conjugal transfer (tra) functions similar to those encoded by the rep and tra genes from the tumor-inducing (Ti) plasmids of Agrobacterium tumefaciens, including homologues of the Ti plasmid quorum-sensing regulators TraI, TraR, and TraM. In A. tumefaciens, TraI, a LuxI-type protein, catalyzes synthesis of the acylated homoserine lactone (acyl-HSL) N-3-oxo-octanoyl-L-homoserine lactone (3-oxo-C8-HSL). TraR binds 3-oxo-C8-HSL and activates expression of Ti plasmid tra and rep genes, increasing conjugation and copy number at high population densities. TraM prevents this activation under noninducing conditions. Although the pNGR234a TraR, TraI, and TraM appear to function similarly to their A. tumefaciens counterparts, the TraR and TraM orthologues are not cross-functional, and the quorum-sensing systems have differences. NGR234 TraI synthesizes an acyl-HSL likely to be 3-oxo-C8-HSL, but traI mutants and a pNGR234a-cured derivative produce low levels of a similar acyl-HSL and another, more hydrophobic signal molecule. TraR activates expression of several pNGR234a tra operons in response to 3-oxo-C8-HSL and is inhibited by TraM. However, one of the pNGR234a tra operons is not activated by TraR, and conjugal efficiency is not affected by TraR and 3-oxo-C8-HSL. The growth rate of NGR234 is significantly decreased by TraR and 3-oxo-C8-HSL through functions encoded elsewhere in the NGR234 genome.     

TraY and integration host factor oriT binding sites and F conjugal transfer: sequence variations, but not altered spacing, are tolerated

Bacterial conjugation is the process by which a single strand of a conjugative plasmid is transferred from donor to recipient. For F plasmid, TraI, a relaxase or nickase, binds a single plasmid DNA strand at its specific origin of transfer (oriT) binding site, sbi, and cleaves at a site called nic. In vitro studies suggest TraI is recruited to sbi by its accessory proteins, TraY and integration host factor (IHF). TraY and IHF bind conserved oriT sites sbyA and ihfA, respectively, and bend DNA. The resulting conformational changes may propagate to nic, generating the single-stranded region that TraI can bind. Previous deletion studies performed by others showed transfer efficiency of a plasmid containing F oriT decreased progressively as increasingly longer segments, ultimately containing both sbyA and ihfA, were deleted. Here we describe our efforts to more precisely define the role of sbyA and ihfA by examining the effects of multiple base substitutions at sbyA and ihfA on binding and plasmid mobilization. While we observed significant decreases in in vitro DNA-binding affinities, we saw little effect on plasmid mobilization even when sbyA and ihfA variants were combined. In contrast, when half or full helical turns were inserted between the relaxosome protein-binding sites, mobilization was dramatically reduced, in some cases below the detectable limit of the assay. These results are consistent with TraY and IHF recognizing sbyA and ihfA with limited sequence specificity and with relaxosome proteins requiring proper spacing and orientation with respect to each other.     

Synthesis of FinP RNA by plasmids F and pSLT is regulated by DNA adenine methylation.

DNA adenine methylase mutants of Salmonella typhimurium contain reduced amounts of FinP, an antisense RNA encoded by the virulence plasmid pSLT. Lowered FinP levels are detected in both Dam- FinO+ and Dam- FinO- backgrounds, suggesting that Dam methylation regulates FinP production rather than FinP half-life. Reduced amounts of F-encoded FinP RNA are likewise found in Dam- mutants of Escherichia coli. A consequence of FinP RNA scarcity in the absence of DNA adenine methylation is that Dam- mutants of both S. typhimurium and E. coli show elevated levels of F plasmid transfer. Inhibition of F fertility by the S. typhimurium virulence plasmid is also impaired in a Dam- background.     

TraG from RP4 and TraG and VirD4 from Ti plasmids confer relaxosome specificity to the conjugal transfer system of pTiC58

Plasmid conjugation systems are composed of two components, the DNA transfer and replication system, or Dtr, and the mating pair formation system, or Mpf. During conjugal transfer an essential factor, called the coupling protein, is thought to interface the Dtr, in the form of the relaxosome, with the Mpf, in the form of the mating bridge. These proteins, such as TraG from the IncP1 plasmid RP4 (TraG(RP4)) and TraG and VirD4 from the conjugal transfer and T-DNA transfer systems of Ti plasmids, are believed to dictate specificity of the interactions that can occur between different Dtr and Mpf components. The Ti plasmids of Agrobacterium tumefaciens do not mobilize vectors containing the oriT of RP4, but these IncP1 plasmid derivatives lack the trans-acting Dtr functions and TraG(RP4). A. tumefaciens donors transferred a chimeric plasmid that contains the oriT and Dtr genes of RP4 and the Mpf genes of pTiC58, indicating that the Ti plasmid mating bridge can interact with the RP4 relaxosome. However, the Ti plasmid did not mobilize transfer from an IncQ relaxosome. The Ti plasmid did mobilize such plasmids if TraG(RP4) was expressed in the donors. Mutations in traG(RP4) with defined effects on the RP4 transfer system exhibited similar phenotypes for Ti plasmid-mediated mobilization of the IncQ vector. When provided with VirD4, the tra system of pTiC58 mobilized plasmids from the IncQ relaxosome. However, neither TraG(RP4) nor VirD4 restored transfer to a traG mutant of the Ti plasmid. VirD4 also failed to complement a traG(RP4) mutant for transfer from the RP4 relaxosome or for RP4-mediated mobilization from the IncQ relaxosome. TraG(RP4)-mediated mobilization of the IncQ plasmid by pTiC58 did not inhibit Ti plasmid transfer, suggesting that the relaxosomes of the two plasmids do not compete for the same mating bridge. We conclude that TraG(RP4) and VirD4 couples the IncQ but not the Ti plasmid relaxosome to the Ti plasmid mating bridge. However, VirD4 cannot couple the IncP1 or the IncQ relaxosome to the RP4 mating bridge. These results support a model in which the coupling proteins specify the interactions between Dtr and Mpf components of mating systems.     

Mobilization of chimeric oriT plasmids by F and R100-1: role of relaxosome formation in defining plasmid specificity

Cleavage at the F plasmid nic site within the origin of transfer (oriT) requires the F-encoded proteins TraY and TraI and the host-encoded protein integration host factor in vitro. We confirm that F TraY, but not F TraM, is required for cleavage at nic in vivo. Chimeric plasmids were constructed which contained either the entire F or R100-1 oriT regions or various combinations of nic, TraY, and TraM binding sites, in addition to the traM gene. The efficiency of cleavage at nic and the frequency of mobilization were assayed in the presence of F or R100-1 plasmids. The ability of these chimeric plasmids to complement an F traM mutant or affect F transfer via negative dominance was also measured using transfer efficiency assays. In cases where cleavage at nic was detected, R100-1 TraI was not sensitive to the two-base difference in sequence immediately downstream of nic, while F TraI was specific for the F sequence. Plasmid transfer was detected only when TraM was able to bind to its cognate sites within oriT. High-affinity binding of TraY in cis to oriT allowed detection of cleavage at nic but was not required for efficient mobilization. Taken together, our results suggest that stable relaxosomes, consisting of TraI, -M, and -Y bound to oriT are preferentially targeted to the transfer apparatus (transferosome).     

Structural basis of specific TraD-TraM recognition during F plasmid-mediated bacterial conjugation

F plasmid-mediated bacterial conjugation requires interactions between a relaxosome component, TraM, and the coupling protein TraD, a hexameric ring ATPase that forms the cytoplasmic face of the conjugative pore. Here we present the crystal structure of the C-terminal tail of TraD bound to the TraM tetramerization domain, the first structural evidence of relaxosome-coupling protein interactions. The structure reveals the TraD C-terminal peptide bound to each of four symmetry-related grooves on the surface of the TraM tetramer. Extensive protein-protein interactions were observed between the two proteins. Mutational analysis indicates that these interactions are specific and required for efficient F conjugation in vivo. Our results suggest that specific interactions between the C-terminal tail of TraD and the TraM tetramerization domain might lead to more generalized interactions that stabilize the relaxosome-coupling protein complex in preparation for conjugative DNA transfer.     

Mutations in the C-terminal region of TraM provide evidence for in vivo TraM-TraD interactions during F-plasmid conjugation

Conjugation is a major mechanism for disseminating genetic information in bacterial populations, but the signal that triggers it is poorly understood in gram-negative bacteria. F-plasmid-mediated conjugation requires TraM, a homotetramer, which binds cooperatively to three binding sites within the origin of transfer. Using in vitro assays, TraM has previously been shown to interact with the coupling protein TraD. Here we present evidence that F conjugation also requires TraM-TraD interactions in vivo. A three-plasmid system was used to select mutations in TraM that are defective for F conjugation but competent for tetramerization and cooperative DNA binding to the traM promoter region. One mutation, K99E, was particularly defective in conjugation and was further characterized by affinity chromatography and coimmunoprecipitation assays that suggested it was defective in interacting with TraD. A C-terminal deletion (S79*, where the asterisk represents a stop codon) and a missense mutation (F121S), which affects tetramerization, also reduced the affinity of TraM for TraD. We propose that the C-terminal region of TraM interacts with TraD, whereas its N-terminal domain is involved in DNA binding. This arrangement of functional domains could in part allow TraM to receive the mating signal generated by donor-recipient contact and transfer it to the relaxosome, thereby triggering DNA transfer.     

Analysis of the major domains of the F fertility inhibition protein, FinO

The mechanism of fertility inhibition of conjugation by the F plasmid depends on the presence of both the FinO protein and an antisense RNA, FinP, which together control the expression of the positive regulator of the transfer operon TraJ. FinO both prevents the degradation of FinP, allowing its intracellular concentration to rise, and promotes duplex formation with its target, the traJ mRNA. In this study, deletions in finO were constructed and fused to gst, encoded by the pGEX-2T expression vector, to give GST-FinO fusions of varying lengths. These fusions were then tested for their ability to bind FinP and traJ mRNA, and to promote duplex formation. Our results suggest that the predicted basic N-terminal α-helix is involved in RNA binding, while the central domain is involved in duplex formation. The presence of the acidic C-terminal domain protects FinP from ribonucleolase degradation and might enhance binding of the N-terminal α-helical domain in a manner reminiscent of the Rom protein of ColE1. Received: 4 May 1998 / Accepted: 15 June 1998     

Single-Stranded DNA Binding by F TraI Relaxase and Helicase Domains Is Coordinately Regulated

Transfer of conjugative plasmids requires relaxases, proteins that cleave one plasmid strand sequence specifically. The F plasmid relaxase TraI (1,756 amino acids) is also a highly processive DNA helicase. The TraI relaxase activity is located within the N-terminal ∼300 amino acids, while helicase motifs are located in the region comprising positions 990 to 1450. For efficient F transfer, the two activities must be physically linked. The two TraI activities are likely used in different stages of transfer; how the protein regulates the transition between activities is unknown. We examined TraI helicase single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) recognition to complement previous explorations of relaxase ssDNA binding. Here, we show that TraI helicase-associated ssDNA binding is independent of and located N-terminal to all helicase motifs. The helicase-associated site binds ssDNA oligonucleotides with nM-range equilibrium dissociation constants and some sequence specificity. Significantly, we observe an apparent strong negative cooperativity in ssDNA binding between relaxase and helicase-associated sites. We examined three TraI variants having 31-amino-acid insertions in or near the helicase-associated ssDNA binding site. B. A. Traxler and colleagues (J. Bacteriol. 188:6346-6353) showed that under certain conditions, these variants are released from a form of negative regulation, allowing them to facilitate transfer more efficiently than wild-type TraI. We find that these variants display both moderately reduced affinity for ssDNA by their helicase-associated binding sites and a significant reduction in the apparent negative cooperativity of binding, relative to wild-type TraI. These results suggest that the apparent negative cooperativity of binding to the two ssDNA binding sites of TraI serves a major regulatory function in F transfer.Transfer of conjugative plasmids between bacteria contributes to genome diversification and acquisition of new traits. Conjugative plasmids encode most proteins required for transfer of one plasmid strand from the donor to the recipient cell (reviewed in references 11, 24, and 43). In preparation for transfer, a complex of proteins assembles at the plasmid origin of transfer (oriT). Within this complex, called the relaxosome, a plasmid-encoded relaxase or nickase binds and cleaves one plasmid strand at a specific oriT site (nic). As part of the cleavage reaction, the relaxase forms a covalent linkage between an active-site tyrosyl hydroxyl oxygen and a single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) phosphate, yielding a 3′ ssDNA hydroxyl (19, 30). Upon initiation of transfer, the plasmid strands are separated, and the cut strand is transported into the recipient. The relaxase is likely transferred into the recipient (12, 31) while still physically attached to plasmid DNA. The transferred relaxase may then join the ends of the ssDNA plasmid copy in the final step of plasmid transfer. Complementary strand synthesis in the donor and the recipient generates a double-stranded plasmid that is competent for further transfer. Successful conjugation requires effective temporal regulation, yet the mechanisms governing this regulation are poorly understood.The F plasmid oriT is ∼500 bp long and includes multiple binding sites for integration host factor (IHF), TraY, and TraM and a single site for TraI, the F relaxase (11). IHF, TraY, and TraM, participants in the relaxosome, bind double-stranded DNA to facilitate the action of TraI, perhaps by creating or stabilizing the ssDNA conformation around nic required for TraI recognition. The F TraI minimal high-affinity binding site includes ∼15 nucleotides around nic (39), and throughout the text, we refer to oligonucleotides that contain the TraI wild-type (wt) or variant binding site as oriT oligonucleotides. F TraI is 192 kDa (42), and in addition to its relaxase activity, TraI has a 5′-to-3′ helicase activity (4). These activities must be physically joined to allow efficient plasmid transfer (29), yet how the two activities are coordinated is a mystery. The relaxase region of F TraI has been defined as the N-terminal ∼300 amino acids (aa) (6, 40). Conserved helicase motifs, including those associated with an ATPase, lie between amino acids 990 and 1450. The C-terminal region (positions 1450 to 1756) plays an important role in bacterial conjugation, possibly involving protein-protein interactions with TraM (32) and/or inner membrane protein TraD (28).The 70-kDa central region of TraI that lies between the relaxase and helicase domains has been implicated in two functions. Haft and colleagues described TraI variants with 31-amino-acid insertions in this TraI region that facilitated plasmid transfer with greater efficiency than that afforded by the wild-type protein when these proteins are expressed at high levels (16). On the basis of this observation, the authors proposed that the region participated in a negative regulation of transfer. Matson and Ragonese demonstrated that this central region is required for TraI helicase function, likely due to participation in ssDNA recognition essential for the helicase activity (28). We wondered whether the proposed regulatory and ssDNA binding roles of the central region are linked and whether this region might help modulate TraI helicase and relaxase activities. Our objectives in this study were to confirm the role of the central region in ssDNA recognition, to assess the affinity and specificity of the ssDNA recognition by the central region, and to determine whether the relaxase and central domain ssDNA binding sites demonstrate cooperativity in binding. Our work yielded two significant and surprising results. First, the binding site within the TraI central region binds ssDNA with high affinity and significant sequence specificity, both unusual characteristics for a helicase. Second, the central region and relaxase ssDNA binding sites show an apparent strong negative cooperativity of binding, possibly explaining the role of the central region as a negative regulator and providing clues about how the timing of conjugative transfer might be regulated.