Demethylation initiated by ROS1 glycosylase involves random sliding along DNA

Active DNA demethylation processes play a critical role in shaping methylation patterns, yet our understanding of the mechanisms involved is still fragmented and incomplete. REPRESSOR OF SILENCING 1 (ROS1) is a prototype member of a family of plant 5-methylcytosine DNA glycosylases that initiate active DNA demethylation through a base excision repair pathway. As ROS1 binds DNA non-specifically, we have critically tested the hypothesis that facilitated diffusion along DNA may contribute to target location by the enzyme. We have found that dissociation of ROS1 from DNA is severely restricted when access to both ends is obstructed by tetraloops obstacles. Unblocking any end facilitates protein dissociation, suggesting that random surface sliding is the main route to a specific target site. We also found that removal of the basic N-terminal domain of ROS1 significantly impairs the sliding capacity of the protein. Finally, we show that sliding increases the catalytic efficiency of ROS1 on 5-meC:G pairs, but not on T:G mispairs, thus suggesting that the enzyme achieves recognition and excision of its two substrate bases by different means. A model is proposed to explain how ROS1 finds its potential targets on DNA.     

A discontinuous DNA glycosylase domain in a family of enzymes that excise 5-methylcytosine

DNA cytosine methylation (5-meC) is a widespread epigenetic mark associated to gene silencing. In plants, DEMETER-LIKE (DML) proteins typified by Arabidopsis REPRESSOR OF SILENCING 1 (ROS1) initiate active DNA demethylation by catalyzing 5-meC excision. DML proteins belong to the HhH-GPD superfamily, the largest and most functionally diverse group of DNA glycosylases, but the molecular properties that underlie their capacity to specifically recognize and excise 5-meC are largely unknown. We have found that sequence similarity to HhH-GPD enzymes in DML proteins is actually distributed over two non-contiguous segments connected by a predicted disordered region. We used homology-based modeling to locate candidate residues important for ROS1 function in both segments, and tested our predictions by site-specific mutagenesis. We found that amino acids T606 and D611 are essential for ROS1 DNA glycosylase activity, whereas mutations in either of two aromatic residues (F589 and Y1028) reverse the characteristic ROS1 preference for 5-meC over T. We also found evidence suggesting that ROS1 uses Q607 to flip out 5-meC, while the contiguous N608 residue contributes to sequence-context specificity. In addition to providing novel insights into the molecular basis of 5-meC excision, our results reveal that ROS1 and its DML homologs possess a discontinuous catalytic domain that is unprecedented among known DNA glycosylases.     

Early steps of active DNA demethylation initiated by ROS1 glycosylase require three putative helix-invading residues

Active DNA demethylation is crucial for epigenetic control, but the underlying enzymatic mechanisms are incompletely understood. REPRESSOR OF SILENCING 1 (ROS1) is a 5-methylcytosine (5-meC) DNA glycosylase/lyase that initiates DNA demethylation in plants through a base excision repair process. The enzyme binds DNA nonspecifically and slides along the substrate in search of 5-meC. In this work, we have used homology modelling and biochemical analysis to gain insight into the mechanism of target location and recognition by ROS1. We have found that three putative helix-intercalating residues (Q607, R903 and M905) are required for processing of 5-meC:G pairs, but dispensable for excision of mismatched 5-meC. Mutant proteins Q607A, R903A and M905G retain the capacity to process an abasic site opposite G, thus suggesting that all three residues play a critical role in early steps of the base extrusion process and likely contribute to destabilization of 5-meC:G pairs. While R903 and M905 are not essential for DNA binding, mutation of Q607 abrogates stable binding to both methylated and nonmethylated DNA. However, the mutant protein Q607A can form stable complexes with DNA substrates containing blocked ends, which suggests that Q607 intercalates into the helix and inhibits sliding. Altogether, our results suggest that ROS1 uses three predicted helix-invading residues to actively interrogate DNA in search for 5-meC.     

Methylation-independent DNA Binding Modulates Specificity of Repressor of Silencing 1 (ROS1) and Facilitates Demethylation in Long Substrates

DNA cytosine methylation is an epigenetic mark that promotes gene silencing and performs critical roles during reproduction and development in both plants and animals. The genomic distribution of DNA methylation is the dynamic outcome of opposing methylation and demethylation processes. In plants, active demethylation occurs through a base excision repair pathway initiated by 5-methycytosine (5-meC) DNA glycosylases of the REPRESSOR OF SILENCING 1 (ROS1)/DEMETER (DME) family. To gain insight into the mechanism by which Arabidopsis ROS1 recognizes and excises 5-meC, we have identified those protein regions that are required for efficient DNA binding and catalysis. We have found that a short N-terminal lysine-rich domain conserved in members of the ROS1/DME family mediates strong methylation-independent binding of ROS1 to DNA and is required for efficient activity on 5-meC·G, but not for T·G processing. Removal of this domain does not significantly affect 5-meC excision from short molecules, but strongly decreases ROS1 activity on long DNA substrates. This region is not required for product binding and is not involved in the distributive behavior of the enzyme on substrates containing multiple 5-meC residues. Altogether, our results suggest that methylation-independent DNA binding allows ROS1 to perform a highly redundant search for efficient excision of a nondamaged, correctly paired base such as 5-meC in long stretches of DNA. These findings may have implications for understanding the evolution of structure and target specificity in DNA glycosylases.     

The DNA Repair Protein XRCC1 Functions in the Plant DNA Demethylation Pathway by Stimulating Cytosine Methylation (5-meC) Excision,Gap Tailoring,and DNA Ligation

DNA methylation patterns are the dynamic outcome of antagonist methylation and demethylation mechanisms, but the latter are still poorly understood. Active DNA demethylation in plants is mediated by a family of DNA glycosylases typified by Arabidopsis ROS1 (repressor of silencing 1). ROS1 and its homologs remove 5-methylcytosine and incise the sugar backbone at the abasic site, thus initiating a base excision repair pathway that finally inserts an unmethylated cytosine. The DNA 3′-phosphatase ZDP processes some of the incision products generated by ROS1, allowing subsequent DNA polymerization and ligation steps. In this work, we examined the possible role of plant XRCC1 (x-ray cross-complementing group protein 1) in DNA demethylation. We found that XRCC1 interacts in vitro with ROS1 and ZDP and stimulates the enzymatic activity of both proteins. Furthermore, extracts from xrcc1 mutant plants exhibit a reduced capacity to complete DNA demethylation initiated by ROS1. An anti-XRCC1 antibody inhibits removal of the blocking 3′-phosphate in the single-nucleotide gap generated during demethylation and reduces the capacity of Arabidopsis cell extracts to ligate a nicked DNA intermediate. Our results suggest that XRCC1 is a component of plant base excision repair and functions at several stages during active DNA demethylation in Arabidopsis.     

The Carboxy-Terminal Domain of ROS1 Is Essential for 5-Methylcytosine DNA Glycosylase Activity

Arabidopsis thaliana repressor of silencing 1 (ROS1) is a multi-domain bifunctional DNA glycosylase/lyase, which excises 5-methylcytosine (5mC) and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) as well as thymine and 5-hydroxymethyluracil (i.e., the deamination products of 5mC and 5hmC) when paired with a guanine, leaving an apyrimidinic (AP) site that is subsequently incised by the lyase activity. ROS1 is slow in base excision and fast in AP lyase activity, indicating that the recognition of pyrimidine modifications might be a rate-limiting step. In the C-terminal half, the enzyme harbors a helix–hairpin–helix DNA glycosylase domain followed by a unique C-terminal domain. We show that the isolated glycosylase domain is inactive for base excision but retains partial AP lyase activity. Addition of the C-terminal domain restores the base excision activity and increases the AP lyase activity as well. Furthermore, the two domains remain tightly associated and can be co-purified by chromatography. We suggest that the C-terminal domain of ROS1 is indispensable for the 5mC DNA glycosylase activity of ROS1.     

Molecular characterization of a putative plant homolog of MBD4 DNA glycosylase

Methyl-CpG-binding domain 4 (MBD4) DNA glycosylase is involved in excision of spontaneous deamination products of cytosine and 5-methylcytosine in animals, but it is unknown whether related proteins perform similar functions in plants. We report here the isolation and biochemical characterization of a putative MBD4 homolog from Arabidopsis thaliana, designated as MBD4L (MBD4-like). The plant enzyme lacks the MBD domain present in mammalian MBD4 proteins, but conserves a DNA glycosylase domain with critical residues for substrate recognition and catalysis, and it is more closely related to MBD4 homologs than to other members of the HhH-GPD superfamily. Arabidopsis MBD4L excises uracil and thymine opposite G, and the presence of halogen substituents at C5 of the target base greatly increases its excision efficiency. No significant activity is detected on cytosine derivatives such as 5-methylcytosine or 5-hydroxymethylcytosine. The enzyme binds to the abasic site product generated after excision, which decreases its catalytic turnover in vitro. Both the full-length protein and a N-terminal truncated version retaining the catalytic domain exhibit a preference for a CpG sequence context, where most plant DNA methylation is found. Our results suggest that an important function of Arabidopsis MBD4L is to protect the plant genome from the mutagenic consequences of cytosine and 5-methylcytosine deamination.     

DNA mismatch-repair in Escherichia coli counteracting the hydrolytic deamination of 5-methyl-cytosine residues.

Derivatives of phage M13 were constructed and used for the in vitro preparation of heteroduplex DNA molecules containing base/base mismatches that mimick DNA lesions caused by hydrolytic deamination of 5-meC residues in Escherichia coli DNA (i.e. they carry a T/G mismatch in the special sequence context provided by the recognition site -CCA/TGG-of the Dcm-methyltransferase). Upon introduction of these heteroduplex DNAs into CaCl2-treated E. coli cells, the mismatches are efficiently repaired with high bias in favour of the DNA strand containing the mismatched guanine residue. This special DNA mismatch-repair operates on fully dam-methylated DNA and is independent of gene mutH. It thus fulfills the salient requirements of a repair pathway responsible for counteracting the spontaneous hydrolytic deamination of 5-meC in vivo. The repair efficiency is boosted by a 5-methyl group present on the cytosine residue at the next-nearest position to the 5' side of the mismatched guanine. The repair is severely impaired in host strains carrying a mutation in any of the three loci dcm, mutL and mutS.     

A search for base analogs to enhance third-strand binding to 'inverted' target base pairs of triplexes in the pyrimidine/parallel motif.

Eight base analogs were tested as third strand residues in otherwise homopyrimidine strands opposite each of the 'direct' (A.T and G.C) and 'inverted' (T.A and C.G) Watson-Crick base pairs, using UV melting profiles to assess triplex stability. The target duplexes contained 20 A.T base pairs and a central test base pair X.Y, while the third strand contained 20 T residues and a central Z test base. Z included 5-bromo-uracil, 5-propynyluracil, 5-propynylcytosine, 5-methyl-cytosine, 5-bromocytosine, hypoxanthine, 2-amino-purine and 2,6-diaminopurine. Some of the base analogs enhanced third strand binding to the target duplex with one or other 'inverted' central base pair relative to the binding afforded by any of the canonical bases. Other analogs did the same for the duplexes with the 'direct' target pairs. The increasing order of triplex stabilization by these base analogs is: opposite the 'inverted' base pairs, for T.A, A < C < 5-pC < 5-pU < T < 5-BrC < 5-meC < 5-BrU < 2-AP < 2,6-DAP < Hy < G, for C.G, 2-AP < A < Hy < G < 5-pC < 5-BrC < 5-meC < C < 2,6-DAP < T < 5-BrU < 5-pU; opposite the 'direct' base pairs, for A.T, 2-AP < A < 5-meC < C < G < Hy < 2,6-DAP < 5-pU < T = 5-BrU < 5-BrC < 5-pC, for G.C, G < 2,6-DAP < 2-AP < A < Hy < T < 5-BrU < 5-pU < 5-pC < 5-BrC < C < 5-meC.     

Exonuclease proofreading by human mitochondrial DNA polymerase

We have examined the ability of the human mitochondrial DNA polymerase to correct errors in DNA sequence using single turnover kinetic methods. The rate of excision of single-stranded DNA ranged from 0.07 to 0.17 x s(-1), depending on the identity of the 3'-base. Excision of the 3'-terminal base from correctly base paired DNA occurred at a rate of 0.05 x s(-1), indicating that the cost of proofreading is minimal, as defined by the ratio of the k(exo) for correctly base-paired DNA divided by the rate of forward polymerization (0.05/37 = 0.14%). Excision of duplex DNA containing 1-7 mismatches was biphasic, and the rate and amplitude of the fast phase increased with the number of mismatches, reaching a maximum of 9 x s(-1). We showed that transfer of DNA from the polymerase to the exonuclease active site and back again occurs through an intramolecular reaction, allowing for a complete cycle of reactions for error correction. For DNA containing a buried mismatch (T:T followed by C:G base pairs), the 3' base was removed at a rate of 3 x s(-1). The addition of nucleotide to the reaction that is identical to the 3' base increased the rate of excision 7-fold to 21 x s(-1). We propose that the free nucleotide enhances the rate of transfer of the DNA to the exonuclease active site by interrupting the correct 3' base pair through interaction with the template base. The exonuclease contribution to fidelity is minimal if the calculation is based on hydrolysis of a single mismatch: (k(exo) + k(pol,over))/(k(pol,over)) = 10, but this value increases to approximately 200 when examining error correction in the presence of nucleotides.     

Base J, found in nuclear DNA of Trypanosoma brucei, is not a target for DNA glycosylases

Base excision repair (BER) is an evolutionarily conserved system which removes altered bases from DNA. The initial step in BER is carried out by DNA glycosylases which recognize altered bases and cut the N-glycosylic bond between the base and the DNA backbone. In kinetoplastid flagellates, such as Trypanosoma brucei, the modified base beta-D-glucosyl-hydroxymethyluracil (J) replaces a small percentage of thymine residues, predominantly in repetitive telomeric sequences. Base J is synthesized at the DNA level via the precursor 5-hydroxymethyluracil (5-HmU). We have investigated whether J in DNA can be recognized by DNA glycosylases from non-kinetoplastid origin, and whether the presence of J and 5-HmU in DNA has required modifications of the trypanosome BER system. We tested the ability of 15 different DNA glycosylases from various origins to excise J or 5-HmU paired to A from duplex oligonucleotides. No excision of J was found, but 5-HmU was excised by AlkA and Mug from Escherichia coli and by human SMUG1 and TDG, confirming previous reports. In a combination of database searches and biochemical assays we identified several DNA glycosylases in T. brucei, but in trypanosome extracts we detected no excision activity towards 5-HmU or ethenocytosine, a product of oxidative DNA damage and a substrate for Mug, TDG and SMUG1. Our results indicate that trypanosomes have a BER system similar to that of other organisms, but might be unable to excise certain forms of oxidatively damaged bases. The presence of J in DNA does not require a specific modification of the BER system, as this base is not recognized by any known DNA glycosylase.     

Base excision and DNA binding activities of human alkyladenine DNA glycosylase are sensitive to the base paired with a lesion

The human alkyladenine DNA glycosylase has a broad substrate specificity, excising a structurally diverse group of damaged purines from DNA. To more clearly define the structural and mechanistic bases for substrate specificity of human alkyladenine DNA glycosylase, kinetics of excision and DNA binding activities were measured for several different damaged and undamaged purines within identical DNA sequence contexts. We found that 1,N(6)-ethenoadenine (epsilonA) and hypoxanthine (Hx) were excised relatively efficiently, whereas 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine, O(6)-methylguanine, adenine, and guanine were not. Single-turnover kinetics of excision of Hx and epsilonA paired with T showed that excision of Hx was about four times faster than epsilonA, whereas binding assays showed that the binding affinity was about five times greater for epsilonA than for Hx. The opposing pyrimidine base had a significant effect on the kinetics of excision and DNA binding affinity of Hx but a small effect on those for epsilonA. Surprisingly, replacing a T with a U opposite Hx dramatically reduced the excision rate by a factor of 15 and increased the affinity by a factor of 7-8. The binding affinity of human alkyladenine DNA glycosylase to a DNA product containing an abasic site was similar to that for an Hx lesion.     

Counteracting the mutagenic effect of hydrolytic deamination of DNA 5-methylcytosine residues at high temperature: DNA mismatch N-glycosylase Mig.Mth of the thermophilic archaeon Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum THF.

Spontaneous hydrolytic deamination of DNA 5-methylcytosine residues gives rise to T/G mismatches which are pre-mutagenic lesions requiring DNA repair. For fundamental reasons, the significance of this and other processes lowering genetic fidelity must be accentuated at elevated temperatures, making thermophilic organisms attractive objects for studying how cells cope with thermal noise threatening the integrity of their genetic information. Gene mig of Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum THF, an anaerobic archaeon with an optimal growth temperature of 65 degrees C, was isolated and its product (Mig.Mth; EC3.2.2-) shown to be a T/G-selective DNA thymine N-glycosylase with the properties required for counteracting the mutagenic effect of hydrolytic 5-meC deamination. The enzyme acts on T/G and U/G oppositions with similar efficiency; G/G, A/G, T/C and U/C are minor substrates; no other opposition of common nucleobases is attacked and no removal of U from single-stranded DNA is observed. Substrate preferences are modulated by sequence context. Together with the results presented here, one example of an enzyme directed against the hydrolytic deamination damage of 5-meC is known from each of the three phylogenetic kingdoms; entry into the repair pathway is glycosylytic in the eukaryotic and the archaeal case, whereas the eubacterial repair starts with an endonucleolytic DNA incision.     

Alkylation damage in DNA and RNA--repair mechanisms and medical significance

Alkylation lesions in DNA and RNA result from endogenous compounds, environmental agents and alkylating drugs. Simple methylating agents, e.g. methylnitrosourea, tobacco-specific nitrosamines and drugs like temozolomide or streptozotocin, form adducts at N- and O-atoms in DNA bases. These lesions are mainly repaired by direct base repair, base excision repair, and to some extent by nucleotide excision repair (NER). The identified carcinogenicity of O(6)-methylguanine (O(6)-meG) is largely caused by its miscoding properties. Mutations from this lesion are prevented by O(6)-alkylG-DNA alkyltransferase (MGMT or AGT) that repairs the base in one step. However, the genotoxicity and cytotoxicity of O(6)-meG is mainly due to recognition of O(6)-meG/T (or C) mispairs by the mismatch repair system (MMR) and induction of futile repair cycles, eventually resulting in cytotoxic double-strand breaks. Therefore, inactivation of the MMR system in an AGT-defective background causes resistance to the killing effects of O(6)-alkylating agents, but not to the mutagenic effect. Bifunctional alkylating agents, such as chlorambucil or carmustine (BCNU), are commonly used anti-cancer drugs. DNA lesions caused by these agents are complex and require complex repair mechanisms. Thus, primary chloroethyl adducts at O(6)-G are repaired by AGT, while the secondary highly cytotoxic interstrand cross-links (ICLs) require nucleotide excision repair factors (e.g. XPF-ERCC1) for incision and homologous recombination to complete repair. Recently, Escherichia coli protein AlkB and human homologues were shown to be oxidative demethylases that repair cytotoxic 1-methyladenine (1-meA) and 3-methylcytosine (3-meC) residues. Numerous AlkB homologues are found in viruses, bacteria and eukaryotes, including eight human homologues (hABH1-8). These have distinct locations in subcellular compartments and their functions are only starting to become understood. Surprisingly, AlkB and hABH3 also repair RNA. An evaluation of the biological effects of environmental mutagens, as well as understanding the mechanism of action and resistance to alkylating drugs require a detailed understanding of DNA repair processes.     

Structure determination of DNA methylation lesions N1-meA and N3-meC in duplex DNA using a cross-linked protein–DNA system

N¹-meA and N³-meC are cytotoxic DNA base methylation lesions that can accumulate in the genomes of various organisms in the presence of S_N2 type methylating agents. We report here the structural characterization of these base lesions in duplex DNA using a cross-linked protein–DNA crystallization system. The crystal structure of N¹-meA:T pair shows an unambiguous Hoogsteen base pair with a syn conformation adopted by N¹-meA, which exhibits significant changes in the opening, roll and twist angles as compared to the normal A:T base pair. Unlike N¹-meA, N³-meC does not establish any interaction with the opposite G, but remains partially intrahelical. Also, structurally characterized is the N⁶-meA base modification that forms a normal base pair with the opposite T in duplex DNA. Structural characterization of these base methylation modifications provides molecular level information on how they affect the overall structure of duplex DNA. In addition, the base pairs containing N¹-meA or N³-meC do not share any specific characteristic properties except that both lesions create thermodynamically unstable regions in a duplex DNA, a property that may be explored by the repair proteins to locate these lesions.     

Role of Two Strictly Conserved Residues in Nucleotide Flipping and N-Glycosylic Bond Cleavage by Human Thymine DNA Glycosylase

Thymine DNA glycosylase (TDG) promotes genomic integrity by excising thymine from mutagenic G·T mismatches arising by deamination of 5-methylcytosine, and follow-on base excision repair enzymes restore a G·C pair. TDG cleaves the N-glycosylic bond of dT and some other nucleotides, including 5-substituted 2′-deoxyuridine analogs, once they have been flipped from the helix into its active site. We examined the role of two strictly conserved residues; Asn¹⁴⁰, implicated in the chemical step, and Arg²⁷⁵, implicated in nucleotide flipping. The N140A variant binds substrate DNA with the same tight affinity as wild-type TDG, but it has no detectable base excision activity for a G·T substrate, and its excision rate is vastly diminished (by ∼10^4.4-fold) for G·U, G·FU, and G·BrU substrates. Thus, Asn¹⁴⁰ does not contribute substantially to substrate binding but is essential for the chemical step, where it stabilizes the transition state by ∼6 kcal/mol (compared with 11.6 kcal/mol stabilization provided by TDG overall). Our recent crystal structure revealed that Arg²⁷⁵ penetrates the DNA minor groove, filling the void created by nucleotide flipping. We found that the R275A and R275L substitutions weaken substrate binding and substantially decrease the base excision rate for G·T and G·BrU substrates. Our results indicate that Arg²⁷⁵ promotes and/or stabilizes nucleotide flipping, a role that is most important for target nucleotides that are relatively large (dT and bromodeoxyuridine) and/or have a stable N-glycosylic bond (dT). Arg²⁷⁵ does not contribute substantially to the binding of TDG to abasic DNA product, and it cannot account for the slow product release exhibited by TDG.     

AlkA protein is the third Escherichia coli DNA repair protein excising a ring fragmentation product of thymine

Various forms of oxidative stress lead to the formation of damaged bases including N-(2-deoxy-beta-D-erythro-pentofuranosyl)-N-3-(2R-hydroxyisobutyric acid)-urea or alphaRT, the fragmentation product of thymine formed from 5R-thymidine C5-hydrate upon hydrolysis. It was shown that alphaRT is excised by Escherichia coli Fpg and Nth proteins. Here we report that when present in DNA, alphaRT is, in addition, a substrate for the E. coli AlkA protein with an apparent K(m) value of congruent with170 nM. alphaRT positioned opposite T, dG, dC, and dA were efficiently excised by AlkA protein from duplex oligodeoxynucleotides in the following order: dA approximately T > dC approximately dG. This is the first example of the excision of a ring opened form of a pyrimidine by AlkA protein and also the first example where the same DNA base lesion is excised by three different DNA glycosylases of the base excision repair pathway. The present results suggest possible structural similarity of the active site between E. coli AlkA, Fpg, and Nth proteins.