Photoperiod Sensitivity during Flower Development of Opium Poppy (Papaver somniferum L.)

Photoperiod is a major factor in flower development of the opiumpoppy (Papaver somniferum L. ‘album DC’) which isa long-day plant. Predicting time to flower in field-grown opiumpoppy requires knowledge of which stages of growth are sensitiveto photoperiod and how the rate of flower development is influencedby photoperiod. The objective of this work was to determinewhen poppy plants first become sensitive to photoperiod andhow long photoperiod continues to influence the time to firstflower under consistent temperature conditions. Plants weregrown in artificially-lit growth chambers with either a 16-hphotoperiod (highly flower inductive) or a 9-h photoperiod (non-inductive).Plants were transferred at 1 to 3-d intervals from a 16- toa 9-h photoperiod andvice versa . All chambers were maintainedat a 12-h thermoperiod of 25/20 °C. Poppy plants becamesensitive to photoperiod 4 d after emergence and required aminimum of four inductive cycles (short dark periods) beforethe plant flowered. Additional inductive cycles, up to a maximumof nine, hastened flowering. After 13 inductive cycles, floweringtime was no longer influenced by photoperiod. These resultsindicate that the interval between emergence and first flowercan be divided into four phases: (1) a photoperiod-insensitivejuvenile phase (JP); (2) a photoperiod-sensitive inductive phase(PSP); (3) a photoperiod-sensitive post-inductive phase (PSPP);and (4) a photoperiod-insensitive post-inductive phase (PIPP).The minimum durations of these phases forPapaver somniferum‘album DC’ under the conditions of our experimentwere determined as 4 d, 4 d, 9 d, and 14 d, respectively. Anthesis; days to flowering; flower bud; opium poppy; Papaver somniferum L.; photoperiod; photoperiod sensitivity; predicting time to flowering; transfer     

Phases of Development to Flowering in Opium Poppy (Papaver somniferumL.) under Various Temperatures

Development up to flowering in opium poppy (Papaver somniferumL.)has been divided into four phases from emergence to anthesiswhich mark changes in its sensitivity to photoperiod: a photoperiod-insensitivejuvenile phase (JP), a photoperiod-sensitive inductive phase(PSP), a photoperiod-sensitive post-inductive phase (PSPP) anda photoperiod-insensitive post-inductive phase (PIPP). To predictflowering time under field conditions, it is essential to knowhow these phases are affected by temperature. Plants were grownin artificially-lit growth chambers and received three differenttemperature treatments: 15/10, 20/15 and 25/20 °C in a 12h thermoperiod. Plants were transferred within each temperatureregime from a non-inductive 9 h to an inductive 16 h photoperiodorvice versaat 1–4 d intervals to determine the durationsof the four phases. Temperature did not affect the durationof the first two phases (i.e. JP lasted 3–4 d and PSPrequired 4–5 d). The most significant effect of temperaturewas on the duration of PSPP which was 28, 20 and 17 d at 15/10,20/15 and 25/20 °C, respectively. The temperature effecton PIPP was small (maximum difference of 3 d between treatments)and the data too variable to indicate a significant trend. Ourresults indicate that PSPP is the only phase that clearly exhibitssensitivity to temperature. Days to flower; opium poppy; Papaver somniferumL.; phases of flower development; photoperiod; temperature     

Effects of Temperature and Photoperiod on Flowering in Lentils (Lens culinaris Medic.)

Factorial combinations of three photoperiods (10, 13 and 16h), two day temperatures (18 and 28 C) and two night temperatures(5 and 13 C) were imposed on nodulated plants of six diversegenotypes (cultivars and land-races) of lentil (Lens culinarisMedic.) grown in pots in growth cabinets from vernalized (1.50.5 C for 30d) or non-vernalized seeds (i.e. 144 ‘treatment’combinations). The times from sowing to the appearance of firstopen flowers were recorded. Vernalization, long days and warmtemperatures hastened flowering but genotypes differed in relativesensitivity to each of these factors and in time to floweringin the same most-inductive environment. Rates of progress towardsflowering (i.e. 1/f the reciprocals of the times to first flower,f) in all genotypes, vernalized or not, were linear functionsof both mean temperature,     

Variation in the Durations of the Photoperiod-sensitive and Photoperiod-insensitive Phases of Development to Flowering Among Eight Maturity Isolines of Soyabean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill]

In soyabean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] the period between sowingand flowering is comprised of three successive developmentalphases—pre-inductive, inductive and post-inductive—inwhich the rate of development is affected, respectively, bytemperature only, by photoperiod and temperature, and then againby temperature only. A reciprocal-transfer experiment (carriedout at a mean temperature of 25°C) in which cohorts of plantswere transferred successively between short and long photoperiodsand vice-versa showed that eight combinations of three pairsof maturity alleles (E₁/e₁, E₂ /e₂, E₃ /e₃) had their greatesteffect on the duration of the inductive phase in long days.This phase was increased with the increasing photoperiod sensitivityinduced by the different gene combinations, and ranged fromabout 27 to 54 d according to genotype. In a short day regime(11·5 h d^-1), less than the critical photoperiod, theduration of the inductive phase was brief—requiring about11 photoperiodic cycles in the less photoperiod-sensitive genotypesand only about seven cycles in the more sensitive ones. Thematurity genes also affected the duration of the two photoperiod-insensitivephases; these durations were positively correlated with thephotoperiod-sensitivity potential of the gene combinations.The largest effect was on the pre-inductive phase which variedfrom 3 to 11 d, while the post-inductive phase varied from about13 to 18 d. As a consequence of these non-photoperiodic effectsof the maturity genes, even in the most inductive regimes (daylengthsless than the critical photoperiod) the time taken to flowerby the less photoperiod-sensitive combinations of maturity geneswas somewhat less than in the more sensitive combinations—rangingfrom about 28 to 34 d. The genetic and practical implicationsof these findings are discussed.Copyright 1994, 1999 AcademicPress Glycine max (L.) Merrill, soyabean, maturity genes, isolines, flowering, photoperiod     

Durations of the Photoperiod-sensitive and Photoperiod-insensitive Phases of Development to Flowering in Four Cultivars of Soyabean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill]

Four cultivars of soyabean [Glycine max (L.) Merill] of diverseorigin were grown in pots in a plastic-house maintained at day/nighttemperatures of 30/20°C. Plants were transferred at varioustimes after sowing from short (11·5 h d^-1) to long (13·5h d^-1) days and vice versa. The times from sowing to first floweringfor control plants grown continuously in short days varied from38 to 53 d, whereas the flowering of plants grown continuouslyin long days was delayed by about 20 d in each cultivar. Theduration of the initial photoperiod-insensitive phase (oftencalled the juvenile phase) varied three-fold between cultivars,i.e. from 11 to 33 d. As expected, the duration of the photoperiod-sensitivephase was greater in long days, but there was comparativelylittle genetic variation in photoperiod-sensitivity as definedin terms of days delay in time to flowering per hour increasein photoperiod (9-11 d h^-1). Similarly, there was little variationin the photoperiod-insensitive post-inductive phase; it rangedfrom 15 to 20 d. In consequence, the duration of the initialphotoperiod-insensitive phase was a strong determinant of timeto first flowering in these cultivars. The importance of thisso-called juvenile trait is discussed in terms of preventingthe premature flowering of USA-adapted cultivars when grownin short tropical daylengths and thus improving the adaptationof the crop to the lower latitudes.Copyright 1993, 1999 AcademicPress Glycine max (L.) Merill, soyabean, photoperiodism, juvenility, flowering     

Effects of Photoperiod, Temperature and Asynchrony between Thermoperiod and Photoperiod on Development to Panicle Initiation in Sorghum

The duration of the vegetative phase (i.e. days from sowingto panicle initiation) in sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]is affected by photoperiod and temperature. Plants of severalcontrasting genotypes of sorghum were grown in controlled-environmentgrowth cabinets with either synchronous or asynchronous photoperiodsand thermoperiods. Apical development was recorded. Diurnalasynchrony between photoperiod and thermoperiod reduced durationsto panicle initiation when the temperature warmed after lightswent on and cooled after lights went off, but increased thesedurations when the temperature warmed before lights went onand cooled before lights went off. These effects were shownin the maturity lines 60M and SM100 and also in the USA cv.RS610 and the Sudanese landrace IS22365, but their magnitudevaried with genotype, photothermal regime, and the degree ofasynchrony. The greatest effect was detected in IS22365 grownat 30/21 °C (12 h/12 h) with a 12 h d^-1photoperiod whenthe temperature warmed 2.5 h before lights went on and cooled2.5 h before lights went off, when the duration from sowingto panicle initiation was 69 d compared with 37 d in the control(synchronous photoperiod and thermoperiod in each diurnal cycle). Reciprocal transfers of plants of IS22365 between short andlong days revealed that asynchrony principally affected theduration of the photoperiod-insensitive pre-inductive phaseof development; i.e. asynchrony affected the time (age) at whichthe plants were first able to respond to photoperiod. In thatinvestigation in controlled-environment growth chambers, thesubsequent photoperiod-sensitive inductive phase continued untilpanicle initiation. Subsequent reciprocal transfer experimentsin controlled-environment glasshouses in four different alternatingtemperature regimes employed synchronous photoperiods and thermoperiodsin short (11 h) days with temperature warming 1.5 h after thebeginning of the day in long (12.5 h) days. In those investigations,photoperiod sensitivity ended some time before (2.5–8.1d, mean 5.7 d) panicle initiation in IS22365, Naga White andSeredo. Moreover, whereas the duration of the photoperiod-insensitivepre-inductive phase was affected by temperature, the durationsof the photoperiod-sensitive inductive and the photoperiod-insensitivepost-inductive phases were not. Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench; sorghum; asynchrony; photoperiod; thermoperiod; vegetative phase; panicle initiation     

Flowering of Stylosanthes guianensis in Relation to Juvenility and the Long-Short Day Requirement

Seedlings of Stylosanthes guianensis var. guianensis were grownin long (14 h) days in five temperature regimes for varyingperiods before transfer to short (11 h) days at 30 ?C/21 ?C.The juvenile phase before seedlings responded to inductive conditionswas c. 45–50 d, 50–60 d and 60–70 d for cv.Schofield, cv. Cook and C.P.I. 34906 respectively, which ispositively related to their critical photoperiod for flowering.Temperatures favourable for growth (e.g. 30 ?C/26 ?C) reducedthe juvenile phase in C.P.I. 34906 and in Cook, which did notflower in 11 h days unless previously exposed to more than 18long days. In a second experiment cv. Cook was confirmed as a long-shortday plant. Seedlings were grown for 50 d in a glasshouse withnatural daylength extended to 13, 14, 16 or 24 h before transferto 12 h photoperiods. Cook floral development was positivelyrelated to daylength provenance before transfer and plants incontinuous 12 h did not flower. Shortening daylength after 48 cycles of 12 h to 11.75 h didnot result in continued floral development in Cook plants butcv. Graham plants were initiated or transitional by 75 d. Key words: Stylosanthes guianensis, Photoperiod, Temperature, Flowering     

The Effects of Temperature and Light Integral on the Phases of Photoperiod Sensitivity inPetuniaxhybrida

Flowering in petunias is hastened by long days, but little isknown about when the plants are most sensitive to photoperiod,or how light integral or temperature affect such phases of sensitivity.The effects of these factors on time to flowering was investigatedusing reciprocal transfer experiments between long (16 h d^-1)and short days (8 h d^-1). The effect of light integral on thephases of photoperiod sensitivity was examined using two sowingdates and a shading treatment (53% transmission). The effectsof temperature were investigated by conducting reciprocal transferexperiments in glasshouse compartments at five temperature regimes(means of 13.7, 19.2, 22.3, 25.0 and 28.7 °C). The lengthof the photoperiod-insensitive juvenile phase of development,when flowering cannot be induced by any environmental stimulus,was sensitive to light integral; low light integrals prolongedthis phase, from 23 d at 2.6 MJ m^-2d^-1to 36 d at 1.6 MJ m^-2d^-1(totalsolar radiation). The length of this development phase was shortest(12.5 d) at 21 °C; it was longer under cooler (21 d at 13.5°C) and warmer temperatures (17.6 d at 28.3 °C). Afterthis phase, time to flowering was influenced greatly by photoperiod,with long days hastening flowering by between 28 and 137 d,compared with short days. Plants also showed some sensitivityto both temperature and light integral during this phase, butthe duration of the final phase of flower development, duringwhich plants were photoperiod-insensitive, was dependent primarilyon the temperature at which the plants were grown; at 14.5 °C,33.9 d were required to complete this phase compared with 11.4d at 25.5 °C. The experimental approach gave valuable informationon the phases of sensitivity to photothermal environment duringthe flowering process, and could provide the basis of a morephysiologically-based quantitative model of flowering than hashitherto been attempted. The information is also useful in thescheduling of lighting and temperature treatments to give optimalflowering times of high quality plants.Copyright 1999 Annalsof Botany Company Petunia,Petuniaxhybrida, juvenility, flowering, photoperiod, temperature, light integral, reciprocal transfer.     

Development in wheat as affected by timing and length of exposure to long photoperiod

Seeds of a spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. ‘Condor’)were vernalized and then grown at 19C in two naturally–litenvironments, one with a moderate (12 h) and the other withlong (18 h) photoperiod. Treatments consisted of transfers ofplants from the moderate to the long photoperiod chamber ondifferent occasions, or for periods of different durations.The main objectives were to determine whether wheat developmentresponds to current and previous photoperiodic environmentsand whether there is a juvenile phase when the plants are insensitiveto photoperiod. Plants under constant 18 h photoperiod had fewerleaves which appeared faster than those under constant 12 hphotoperiod (i.e. phyllochron was increased from 4.4 to 5.1d leaf^–1). Plants transferred from 12 h to 18 h photoperiodat terminal spikelet appearance (TSA) reached anthesis 4 d earlierthan plants retained at 12 h, while plants under continuouslong photoperiod (18 h) completed this phase most rapidly. Thus,there was some evidence for a historic effect of photoperiodon development. Exposure to long photoperiod during the first 5 d after plantemergence accelerated the rate of development towards anthesis,suggesting that there was no juvenile period of photoperiodicinsensitivity. There were, however, changes during ontogenyin the degree of sensitivity to long photoperiod, increasingfrom seedling emergence to a maximum c. 15 d later, and thendecreasing again. Although all treatments were imposed beforeTSA, the response was not limited to the pre-TSA phase, suggestingthat well before the terminal spikelet appeared, the plant wasalready committed to the initiation of this spikelet. Spikeletnumber decreased with delayed transfer to long photoperiod witha minimum for plants transferred to long days from 16-20 d afterseedling emergence. Additionally, there was a trend for an increasein the rate of leaf appearance (decrease in phyllochron) whenthe plants were exposed to long days between 10 and 35 d afterseedling emergence. Although the differences were small, whenconsidered in conjunction with the effects on final leaf numberthey become important in explaining differences in time to anthesis. Key words: Development, flowering, leaf number, photoperiod, phyllochron, Triticum aestivum     

The Effects of Temperature and Photoperiod on the Onset of Summer Dormancy in Poa bulbosa L.

Poa bulbosa L. plants became dormant in long days (16 h), whilein short days (8 h) they remained non-dormant for extended periods.Morphologically, the onset of dormancy was expressed by theformation of a true bulb at the base of every tiller, by thecessation of tillering and leaf emergence and, finally, by thedrying-up of the leaves. Low temperature delayed the onset ofdormancy but did not prevent it. This effect of temperaturemay explain the delayed onset of dormancy observed in naturalpopulations under a cool climate at a hilly habitat, comparedto plants growing under a warmer climate, at a lower, coastal-plainhabitat. Dormancy could be induced under short days by pre-exposureof the plants to a limited number of long days. The responsewas proportional to the number of long days given. The adaptivesignificance of the results for plant survival in a Mediterraneanclimate is discussed. Poa bulbosa L., summer dormancy, photoperiod, temperature, leaf emergence, bulbs, tillers     

Studies in the Physiology of the Onion Plant: IV. THE INFLUENCE OF DAY-LENGTH AND TEMPERATURE ON THE FLOWERING OF THE ONION PLANT

At temperatures above about 17° C. inflorescence initiationin growing onion plants, as in stored sets, is suppressed whetherthe plants are kept in long or short days. Independently ofcurrent day-length and of previous day-length treatment, ifthe plants are sufficiently large initiation begins very shortlyafter the temperature falls below c. 15° C. Emerged infiorescencesappear some ten or so weeks later. Small plants are unable toinitiate inflores cences under any of the conditions tested,and actual size (perhaps leaf area) rather than leaf or nodenumber seems to be the important factor. Inflorescence emergenceis suppressed at high temperatures in short days or long days;in long days bulb formation also suppresses emergence at lowertemperatures. In long days at temperatures sufficiently lowfor bulbing to be delayed, however, emergence is accelerated.Plants which have produced bulbs in long days in the summershow a delay of inflorescence emergence in the following winter.     

Alternating Temperatures and Rate of Seed Germination in Lentil

The effect of alternating temperatures on the times taken byseeds of lentil (Lens culinaris Medikus) to germinate was investigatedusing a two-way temperature-gradient plate. Between 5 and 25°C,warmer temperatures increased the rate of germination. Variationamong the individual seeds in the times required for germinationat different constant temperatures within this range were describedwell by a log-normal distribution of thermal times, accumulatedabove a base temperature of 1·5°C. Even with amplitudesas great as 20°C, no effect of alternation per se on thethermal time required for germination was detected—whetherthe cool temperature was applied for 8 or 16 h d^-1. Similarly,in alternating temperature regimes where the minimum temperatureof the diurnal cycle was between 0°C and the base temperature,the thermal times required for germination (where no thermaltime accrued during the periods when temperature was below T_b)were in close agreement with those values provided by the modeldetermined at warmer constant temperatures. However, where theminimum temperature applied was < 0°C the germinationof all but the earliest germinators was delayed beyond modelpredictions, and more so where the sub-zero minimum temperaturewas applied for 16 rather than 8 h d^-1. The results, therefore,contradict the view that alternation in temperature per se reducesthe thermal time required for seed germination. Rather, rateof germination responds instantaneously to current temperature,but prolonged exposure to sub-zero temperatures can result indamage sufficient to delay germination when seeds are returnedto regimes warmer than the base temperature.Copyright 1994,1999 Academic Press Lens culinaris Medikus, lentil, seed germination, alternating temperatures, thermal time, temperature-gradient plate     

Flowering in Pisum: the Effect of Genotype, Plant Age, Photoperiod, and Number of Inductive Cycles

The genotypes If e Sn hr, Lf e Sn hr, and If e Sn Hr requirefewer inductive cycles as they age. It is suggested that thisresults from a decrease in the activity of the Sn gene in theleaves as they age, resulting in a higher ratio of promoterto inhibitor. Gene Lf does not affect the rate of this agingbut it does increase the number of inductive cycles requiredfor flower induction over the first 5 weeks of growth. The geneHr has no effect until week 4 but thereafter causes a reductionin the effect of age on the Sn gene. The genotype If e Sn Hrcan be induced by a single inductive cycle (32 h of light) fora relatively long period. The length of dark period required for the expression of theSn gene is shown to be less than 4 h providing a relativelylong photoperiod precedes the dark period. It appears that noper manent induction of tissue by photoperiods favourable toflowering occurs in peas. The critical photoperiod for plantsof genotype if e Sn Hr is shown to be between 12 and 14 h atl7·5 °C and the usefulness of the term ‘criticalphotoperiod’ is discussed with respect to quantitativelong-day plants.     

Dual Floral Induction Requirements in Phleum alpinum

Flowering requirements of four Norwegian populations of Phleumalpinum were studied in controlled environments. A dual inductionrequirement was demonstrated in all populations. Inflorescenceinitiation had an obligatory requirement for short days (SD)and/or low temperature, while culm elongation and heading wereenhanced by long days (LD) and higher temperatures. At 3 and6 °C primary induction was almost independent of photoperiod,whereas SD was more effective than LD at higher temperatures.The critical temperature for primary induction was about 15°C in SD and 12 °C in LD. Saturation of induction required12 weeks of exposure to inductive conditions, although someheading and flowering took place with 6 weeks exposure to optimalconditions (9 °C/SD). Inflorescence development also tookplace in 8 h SD although it was delayed and culm elongationwas strongly inhibited compared with LD conditions. Only smalldifferences in flowering response were found between the populations. Phleum alpinum L., alpine timothy, dual floral induction, flowering, photoperiod, temperature     

Photothermal Time for Flowering in Lentils (Lens culinaris) and the Analysis of Potential Vernalization Responses

Two cultivars of lentils, Laird and Precoz, were subjected to18 potentially vernalizing treatments, comprising constant temperaturesof 1, 5 or 9 °C in factorial combination with photoperiodsof 8 or 16 h for 10, 30 or 60 d. These seeds or seedlings, togetherwith non-vernalized seeds (as controls), were then transferredto four different growing regimes (‘day’/‘night’temperatures of 18/5 °C or 24/13 °C, factorially combinedwith photoperiods of 11 or 16 h). Variation in the number ofdays from sowing to first flower (f) in the growing regimesfor the controls conformed to the equation I/f = a+b+cP, whereis mean temperature (°C), P is photoperiod (h) and a, band c are genotype-specific constants. Accordingly, when theenvironment varies during development, the photothermal timerequired to flower in day-degrees (°C d) is given by 1/babove a base temperature defined as —(a+cP)/b. Most variationin time to flower could be accounted for by the photothermaltime accumulated in the two successive environments. Therefore,there was no evidence of a specific low-temperature vernalizationresponse in either cultivar. Neither was there evidence of ‘short-day’vernalization, i.e. advancement of flowering resulting frompreliminary short-day treatments. A potential error inherentin the predictive model described arises because it ignoresthe presence of a pre-inductive, photoperiod-insensitive phase;but agro-ecological considerations suggest that this error maynot be important in practice. Lens culinaris, lentil, flowering, photoperiodism, vernalization, photothermal time, screening germplasm     

Possible mechanisms of increasing salt tolerance in lentil plants after pre-exposure to low salt concentration

The main objective of the present study is to test the effect of short preexposure of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) plants to low salt concentration on shoot growth, oxidative stress and activity of antioxidant enzymes under high salt stress. To fulfill this objective, lentil plants were pretreated with 10 mM NaCl for 3 days and then they were exposed to high salt concentration of 300 mM for 7 days. After that, shoot growth was evaluated in terms of shoot length, fresh and dry weight. Biochemical changes in terms of oxidative stress and activity of antioxidant enzymes were also assessed in lentil plants. The shoot growth of lentil plants preexposed to low salt concentration was significantly enhanced under high salt stress, whereas it was severely retarded in lentil plants that were directly exposed to high salt stress. Moreover, lipid peroxidation and the accumulation of hydrogen peroxide were highly reduced in the shoot of lentil plants preexposed to low salt concentration. The activity of antioxidant enzymes (catalase and superoxide dismutase) was significantly higher in the shoot of lentil plants preexposed to low salt concentration than those directly exposed to high salt concentration. Overall, the results revealed an enhanced salt tolerance in lentil plants after short exposure to low salt concentration.     

The Growth and Development of the Wheat Apex: The Effects of Photoperiod on Spikelet Production and Sucrose Concentration in the Apex

Spring wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Warimba) plants were grownin a controlled environment (20°C) in two photoperiods (8or 16 h). In the first instance, plants were maintained in eachof the photoperiods from germination onwards at the same irradiance(375 µE m^–2 s^–1). In the second case, allplants were grown in a long photoperiod until 4 days after double-ridgeinitiation when half the plants were transferred to a shortphotoperiod with double the irradiance (16 h photoperiod at225 or 8 h at 475 µE ^–2 s^–1). The rates of growth and development of the apices were promotedby the longer photoperiod in both experiments. Shoot dry weightgain was proportional to the total light energy received perday whereas the dry weight of the shoot apex increased withincreasing photoperiod even when the total daily irradiancewas constant. The principal soluble carbohydrate present in the shoot apexwas sucrose, although low concentrations of glucose and fructosewere found in the apices of long photoperiod plants late indevelopment. Sucrose concentration was invariably greater inthe slow-growing apices of short photoperiod plants, but roseto approach this level in the long photoperiod plants when theterminal spikelet had been initiated. Triticum aestivum, wheat, apex, spikelet initiation, photoperiod, flower initiation     

The Development of Desiccation-tolerance and Maximum Seed Quality During Seed Maturation in Six Grain Legumes

‘Physiological maturity’, i.e. the time when seedsreach their maximum dry weight during development, occurredwhen maturation drying on the parent plant in the field hadreduced seed moisture content to approximately 60 per cent infaba bean (Vicia faba L.), lentil (Lens culinaris Medic.), chickpea(Cicer arietinum L.), white lupin (Lupinus albus L.), soya bean(Glycine max [L.] Merr.) and pea (Pisum sativum L.) The onsetof desiccation-tolerance, i.e. the ability of seeds to germinatefollowing harvest and rapid artificial drying, coincided withphysiological maturity, except in pea where it occurred a littleearlier at about 70 per cent moisture content. Maximum seedquality as determined by maximum viability, minimum seedlingabnormalities and maximum seedling size occurred in pea, chickpeaand lupin when seeds were harvested for rapid drying at physiologicalmaturity; but for maximum seed quality in the other speciesmaturation drying had to proceed further - to about 45 per centmoisture content in soya bean and to about 30 per cent moisturecontent in lentil and faba bean seed crops. Much of this variationamongst the six species, however, was due to differences inthe variation in maturity within each seed crop. Results forindividual pods showed that peak maturity, i.e. maximum seedquality following harvest and rapid artificial drying, was achievedin all six species once maturation drying had reduced the moisturecontent of the seeds to 45–50 per cent. In pea, faba beanand soya bean there was a substantial decline in viability andan increase in seedling abnormalities when harvest was delayedbeyond the optimal moisture content for harvest.     

Translocation of Nitrogenous Compounds in Symbiotic and Nitrate-Fed Amide-Exporting Legumes

Peoples, M. B., Sudin, M. N. and Herridge, D. F. 1987. Translocationof nitrogenous compounds insymbiotic and nitrate-fed amide-exportinglegumes.–J. exp. Bot. 38: 567–579. The transport of nitrogen from the roots and nodules of chickpea(Cicer anetinum L.), lentil (Lens culinaris Medic), faba bean(Vicia faba L.) and pea (Pisum sativum L.) was examined in glasshouse-grownplants supplied either with nitrate-free nutrients or with nutrientssupplemented with 1,2,4 or 8 mol m^-3153N-nitrate. A sixth treatmentcomprised uninoculated plants supplied with 8–0 mol m^-31513N-nitrate. For each species, more than 75% of the nitrogenwas exported from the nodules as the amides, asparagine andglutamine. In fully symbiotic plants, the amides also dominatednitrogen transport to the shoot When N2 fixation activity wasdecreased by the addition of nitrate to the rooting medium,the N-composition of xylem exudate and stem solutes changedconsiderably. The relative concentrations of asparagine tendedto increase in the xylem whilst those of glutamine were reduced;the levels of nitrate increased in both xylem exudate and thesoluble nitrogen pool of the stem with a rise in nitrate supply.The changes in relative nitrate contents reflected generallythe contributions of root and shoot to overall nitrate reductaseactivity at the different levels of nitrate used. The relationshipsbetween the relative contents of xylary or stem nitrate andamino nitrogen and the plants' reliance on N2 fixation (determinedby the ¹⁵N isotope dilution procedure) were examined. Data suggestthat compositional relationships based on nitrate may be reasonableindicators of symbiotic dependence for all species under studyexcept faba bean when greater than 25% of plant nitrogen wasderived from N2 fixation. Key words: Nitrogen, translocation, legumes     

The cell cycle in the shoot apex ofSilene during the first day of floral induction

Summary The length of the cell cycle was measured in the shoot apical meristem ofSilene coeli-rosa during the first day of an inductive photoperiod. The length of the cell cycle in the shoot apex of vegetative controls (those in short days) was about 18–20 hours. Exposure of plants to the long day resulted in an immediate shortening of the cell cycle to about 13 hours, roughly two thirds of that in short days. Measurements of the component phases of the cell cycle revealed that the shortened cycle in long days was the result of a decrease in the length of G 1 and perhaps S, whilst G 2 and M remained constant.