Immunologic biomarkers as correlates of clinical response to cancer immunotherapy

Over the last few years, several newly developed immune-based cancer therapies have been shown to induce clinical responses in significant numbers of patients. As a result, there is a need to identify immune biomarkers capable of predicting clinical response. If there were laboratory parameters that could define patients with improved disease outcomes after immunomodulation, product development would accelerate, optimization of existing immune-based treatments would be facilitated and patient selection for specific interventions might be optimized. Although there are no validated cancer immunologic biomarkers that are predictive of clinical response currently in widespread use, there is much published literature that has informed investigators as to which markers may be the most promising. Population-based studies of endogenous tumor immune infiltrates and gene expression analyses have identified specific cell populations and phenotypes of immune cells that are most likely to mediate anti-tumor immunity. Further, clinical trials of cancer vaccines and other cancer directed immunotherapy have identified candidate immunologic biomarkers that are statistically associated with beneficial clinical outcomes after immune-based cancer therapies. Biomarkers that measure the magnitude of the Type I immune response generated with immune therapy, epitope spreading, and autoimmunity are readily detected in the peripheral blood and, in clinical trials of cancer immunotherapy, have been associated with response to treatment.     

A combination of intradermal jet-injection and electroporation overcomes in vivodose restriction of DNA vaccines

Development of various vaccines for prostate cancer (PCa) is becoming an active research area. PCa vaccines are perceived to have less toxicity compared with the available cytotoxic agents. While various immune-based strategies can elicit anti-tumour responses, DNA vaccines present increased efficacy, inducing both humoural and cellular immunity. This immune activation has been proven effective in animal models and initial clinical trials are encouraging. However, to validate the role of DNA vaccination in currently available PCa management paradigms, strong clinical evidence is still lacking. This article provides an overview of the basic principles of DNA vaccines and aims to provide a summary of preclinical and clinical trials outlining the benefits of this immunotherapy in the management of PCa.     

Immunological monitoring of the tumor immunoenvironment for clinical trials

Monitoring of immunotherapeutic clinical trials has undergone a considerable change in the last decade resulting in a general agreement that immune monitoring should guide the development of cancer vaccines. The emphasis on immune cell functions and quantitation of antigen-specific T cells have been playing a major role in the attempts to establish meaningful correlations between therapy-induced alterations in immune responses and clinical endpoints. However, one significant unresolved issue in modern immunotherapy is that when a tumor-specific cellular immune response is observed following the course of immunotherapy, it does not always lead to clinically proven cancer regression. This disappointing lack of a correlation between the tumor-specific cytotoxic immune responses and the clinical efficacy of immunotherapy may be explained, among other reasons, by the notion that the analysis of any single immunological parameter is not sufficient to provide clinically feasible information about the complex interactions between different cell subsets in the peripheral blood and immune, tumor, and stromal cells in the tumor milieu. By contrast, a systemic approach is required for improving the quality of a serial monitoring to ensure that it adequately and reliably measures potential changes induced in patients by administered vaccines or immunomodulators. Comprehensive evaluation of the balance between the immunostimulatory and immunosuppressive compartments of the immune system could be critical for a better understanding of how a given immunotherapy works or does not work in a particular clinical trial. New approaches to characterize tumor-infiltrating leukocytes, their phenotypic, biochemical, and genetic characteristics within the tumor microenvironment need to be developed and validated and should complement current monitoring techniques. These immune-monitoring assays for the local tumor immunoenvironment should be developed, validated, and standardized for reliability and consistency in order to establish the overall performance standards.     

Personalized neoantigen vaccines: A new approach to cancer immunotherapy

Neoantigens arise from somatic mutations that differ from wild-type antigens and are specific to each individual patient, which provide tumor specific targets for developing personalized cancer vaccines. Decades of work has increasingly shown the potential of targeting neoantigens to generate effective clinical responses. Current clinical trials using neoantigen targeting cancer vaccines, including in combination with checkpoint blockade monoclonal antibodies, have demonstrated potent T-cell responses against those neoantigens accompanied by antitumor effects in patients. Personalized neoantigen vaccines represent a potential new class of cancer immunotherapy.     

Strategies in cancer vaccines development

The recent definition of tumour-specific immunity in cancer patients and the identification of tumour-associated antigens have generated renewed enthusiasm for the application of immune-based therapies for the treatment of malignancies. Recent developments in cancer vaccines have also been based on an improved understanding of the cellular interactions required to induce a specific anti-tumour immune response. Consequently, a number of cancer vaccines have entered clinical trials. Targeting broad-spectrum tumour-associated antigens has emerged as a strategy to lower the risk of tumour escape due to the loss of specific nominal antigen. Amongst the most challenging of tumour-associated antigens to which to target in active specific immunotherapy applications are carbohydrate antigens. As carbohydrates are intrinsically T-cell-independent antigens, more novel approaches are perhaps needed to drive specific-T-cell-dependent immune responses to carbohydrate antigens. In this context peptide mimetics of core structures of tumour-associated carbohydrate antigens might be developed to augment immune responses to these broad-spectrum antigens.     

Biological response modifiers in cancer

We have seen a surge in the use of immunotherapy for the treatment of cancer. Biological response modifiers can act passively by enhancing the immunologic response to tumor cells or actively by altering the differentiation/growth of tumor cells. Active immunotherapy with cytokines such as interferons (IFNs) and interleukins (IL-2) is a form of nonspecific active immune stimulation. The use of IL-2 has recently been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma and metastatic colorectal cancer. Considerable success has been achieved with the use of immunotherapy, especially in the area of passive immunotherapy using monoclonal antibodies--in particular, radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies. In addition to the various monoclonal antibodies that have been used in clinical trials, other strategies such as the use of antiangiogenic agents and matrix metalloprotease inhibitors (MMPIs) have also met with some success. Recently, the FDA approved bevacizumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agent, for the treatment of metastatic melanoma. This review also sheds light on the various angiogenesis inhibitors in clinical trials, the increasing use of thalidomide in cancer, and the upcoming potential cancer vaccines designed to activate cell-mediated immune responses against tumor antigens.     

Combinational adenovirus-mediated gene therapy and dendritic cell vaccine in combating well-established tumors

Recent developments in tumor immunology and biotechnology have made cancer gene therapy and immunotherapy feasible. The current efforts for cancer gene therapy mainly focus on using immunogenes, chemogenes and tumor suppressor genes. Central to all these therapies is the development of efficient vectors for gene therapy. By far, adenovirus （AdV）-mediated gene therapy is one of the most promising approaches, as has confirmed by studies relating to animal tumor models and clinical trials. Dendritic cells （DCs） are highly efficient, specialized antigen-presenting cells, and DC- based tumor vaccines are regarded as having much potential in cancer immunotherapy. Vaccination with DCs pulsed with tumor peptides, lysates, or RNA, or loaded with apoptotic/necrotic tumor cells, or engineered to express certain cytokines or chemokines could induce significant antitumor cytotoxic T lymphocyte （CTL） responses and antitumor immunity. Although both AdV-mediated gene therapy and DC vaccine can both stimulate antitumor immune responses, their therapeutic efficiency has been limited to generation of prophylactic antitumor immunity against re-challenge with the parental tumor cells or to growth inhibition of small tumors. However, this approach has been unsuccessful in combating well-established tumors in animal models. Therefore, a major strategic goal of current cancer immunotherapy has become the development of novel therapeutic strategies that can combat well-established tumors, thus resembling real clinical practice since a good proportion of cancer patients generally present with significant disease. In this paper, we review the recent progress in AdV-mediated cancer gene therapy and DC-based cancer vaccines, and discuss combined immunotherapy including gene therapy and DC vaccines. We underscore the fact that combined therapy may have some advantages in combating well-established tumors vis-a-vis either modality administered as a monotherapy.     

Pilot study of a novel combination of two therapeutic vaccines in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients

Cancer vaccines contain tumor antigens in a pro-inflammatory context with the purpose to generate potent antitumor immune responses. However, tumor cells develop different immunosuppressive mechanisms that limit the effectiveness of an anticancer immune response. Therefore, therapeutic vaccine treatment alone is usually not sufficient to generate tumor regression or survival improvement, especially in the advanced disease scenario in which most clinical studies have been conducted. Combining cancer vaccines with different anticancer therapies such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy and other immunotherapeutic agents has had different levels of success. However, the combination of cancer vaccines with different mechanisms of action has not been explored in clinical trials. To address this issue, the current review summarizes the main clinical and immunological results obtained with two different therapeutic vaccines used in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients, inducing an immune response against epidermal growth factor (CIMAvax-EGF) and NGcGM3 ganglioside (racotumomab). We also discuss preliminary findings obtained in a trial of combination of these two vaccines and future challenges with these therapies.     

Immune modulation by dendritic-cell-based cancer vaccines

The interplay between host immunity and tumour cells has opened the possibility of targeting tumour cells by modulation of the human immune system. Cancer immunotherapy involves the treatment of a tumour by utilizing the recombinant human immune system components to target the pro-tumour microenvironment or by revitalizing the immune system with the ability to kill tumour cells by priming the immune cells with tumour antigens. In this review, current immunotherapy approaches to cancer with special focus on dendritic cell (DC)-based cancer vaccines are discussed. Some of the DC-based vaccines under clinical trials for various cancer types are highlighted. Establishing tumour immunity involves a plethora of immune components and pathways; hence, combining chemotherapy, radiation therapy and various arms of immunotherapy, after analysing the benefits of individual therapeutic agents, might be beneficial to the patient.     

Preparation of peptide-loaded dendritic cells for cancer immunotherapy

Dendritic cell-based vaccines are being evaluated in clinical trials to determine their ability to activate clinically relevant tumor antigen-specific immune responses. Although some groups isolate dendritic cells from peripheral blood, most have found it more efficient to generate large numbers from peripheral blood progenitors, particularly plastic adherent or CD14+ monocytes, in media supplemented with GM-CSF and IL-4. These DC may then be matured, if desired, and loaded with antigen, such as tumor-associated peptides, prior to administration. We describe the scheme that we are currently using to generate peptide-loaded dendritic cells for our clinical trials of cancer immunotherapy.     

Vaccine strategies against melanoma

Melanoma incidence increases and conventional antitumor therapies are often ineffective, encouraging the design of novel therapies. Several lines of evidence support the notion of an immunological control of melanoma growth. Based on this information, active immunotherapy (vaccination) and adoptive immunotherapy trials (T cell therapy) were conducted in metastatic melanoma patients. The proof of principle of effective immunotherapy was brought up by pionnering trials using tumor infiltrated lymphocytes in lymphodepleted recipients or anti-CTLA4 Ab leading to tumor eradication but also autoimmune diseases. With the identification and characterization of tumor antigens recognized by cytotoxic T lymphocytes, the utilization of tumor rejection antigens along with adjuvants become available as tumor vaccines. The last five years have witnessed the emergence of dendritic cell based-vaccines that were efficient in priming and/or boosting T cell responses in normal volunteers and patients. This review highlights preclinical bases of cancer vaccines, their clinical development and discusses their limits. Correlations between immunomonitoring and tumor regressions await larger trials.     

Vaccination against angiogenesis-associated antigens: a novel cancer immunotherapy strategy

Therapeutic vaccines represent an attractive approach to cancer treatment. Traditionally, cancer immunotherapy targets antigens expressed by the tumor cells. Although numerous clinical trials studying different cancer vaccines have been conducted during the past twenty years, very limited clinical responses have been observed. The inefficient anti-tumor immunity is thought to be due, in major part, to the escape mechanisms exerted by the genetically unstable tumor cells, e.g., emergence of antigen-loss mutants, downregulation of MHC molecules and lack of expression of costimulatory molecules. Recently, a novel vaccine strategy has been developed to circumvent these obstacles. Taking advantage of the importance of angiogenesis in tumor growth and the genetic stability of endothelial cells, this immunotherapy strategy targets antigens (e.g., angiogenic growth factor receptors) overexpressed by the tumor neo-vasculature rather than the tumor cells per se. For example, active immunization against vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) has been shown to generate strong cellular and humoral immune responses, which lead to the inhibition of angiogenesis and tumor growth and metastasis. This review provides an outline of this emerging field and discusses the advantages and potential pitfalls of such a vaccine strategy.     

Dendritic cells for specific cancer immunotherapy

The characterization of tumor-associated antigens recognized by human T lymphocytes in a major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-restricted fashion has opened new possibilities for immunotherapeutic approaches to the treatment of human cancers. Dendritic cells (DC) are professional antigen presenting cells that are well suited to activate T cells toward various antigens, such as tumor-associated antigens, due to their potent costimulatory activity. The availability of large numbers of DC, generated either from hematopoietic progenitor cells or monocytes in vitro or isolated from peripheral blood, has profoundly changed pre-clinical research as well as the clinical evaluation of these cells. Accordingly, appropriately pulsed or transfected DC may be used for vaccination in the field of infectious diseases or tumor immunotherapy to induce antigen-specific T cell responses. These observations led to pilot clinical trials of DC vaccination for patients with cancer in order to investigate the feasibility, safety, as well as the immunologic and clinical effects of this approach. Initial clinical studies of human DC vaccines are generating encouraging preliminary results demonstrating induction of tumor-specific immune responses and tumor regression. Nevertheless, much work is still needed to address several variables that are critical for optimizing this approach and to determine the role of DC-based vaccines in tumor immunotherapy.     

乳腺癌免疫治疗：生物标志物、药物及疫苗

虽然近年来肿瘤的治疗取得较大进展,乳腺癌依旧是威胁女性健康的主要杀手。近年来,乳腺癌相关的免疫治疗取得较大进展,肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞(TILs)、程序性死亡受体 1(PD 1)及其配体PD L1、肿瘤突变负荷等肿瘤标志物对乳腺癌免疫治疗具有预测作用,并与乳腺癌的预后相关。免疫检查点抑制剂,例如PD-1/PD-L1及细胞毒性T淋巴细胞抗原4(CTLA 4)抑制剂在乳腺癌中取得极大进展,各期临床试验结果显示不同的效用。肿瘤疫苗的使用为乳腺癌免疫治疗的另一途径,虽然部分疫苗在临床试验中取得较好成效,但绝大多数仍需深入研究,乳腺癌免疫治疗之途仅为开端,依旧需要大量研究。本文简要介绍了乳腺癌免疫治疗相关的生物标志物、免疫检查点抑制剂以及肿瘤疫苗的研究进展。     

Immunotherapy of tumor by targeting angiogenesis

Tumor growth and metastasis are angiogenesis-dependent. Anti-angiogenic therapy represents a new strategy for the development of anti-cancer therapies. In recent years, there has been made great progress in anti-angiogenic therapy. As far as the passive immunotherapy is concerned, a recombinant humanized antibody to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-Avastin has been approved by FDA as the first angiogenesis inhibitor to treat colorectal cancer. For active specific immunotherapy, various strategies for cancer vaccines, including whole endothelial cell vaccines, dendritic cell vaccines, DNA vaccines, and peptides or protein vaccines, have been developed to break immune tolerance against important molecules associated with tumor angiogenesis and induce angiogenesis-specific immune responses. This article reviews the angiogenesis-targeted immunotherapy of tumor from the above two aspects.     

Immunotherapy of tumor by targeting angiogenesis

As early as 1971, Folkman proposed that thegrowth of and persistence of solid tumors and theirmetastasis depended on an adequate blood supply and,therefore, an anti-angiogenic strategy might be effec-tive as an anticancer therapy. As a strategy for cancertherapy, anti-angiogenic therapy attempts to stop newvessels from forming around a tumor and break up theexisting network of abnormal capillaries that feed thecancerous mass[1,2]. Anti-angiogenic therapy take someadvantages over the convention…     

Monitoring the immune competence of cancer patients to predict outcome

A new era of cancer immunotherapy has brought not only successful cancer vaccines but also immunomodulators, such as those that target checkpoint blockade in order to induce endogenous host immune responses. However, the immune system of cancer patients can be compromised through multiple means, including immune suppression by the tumor and by prior therapies such as chemotherapy and radiation. Therefore, a comprehensive means of assessing patient immunocompetence would seem helpful for determining whether patients are ready to benefit from immunotherapy, and perhaps even which immunotherapy might be most appropriate for them. Unfortunately, there are no standardized tests for immune competence, nor is there agreement on what to measure and what will be predictive of outcome. In this review, we will discuss the technologies and assays that might be most useful for this purpose. We argue for a comprehensive approach that should maximize the chances of developing predictive biomarkers for eventual clinical use.     

Immunotherapy of cancer: promise and reality

The notion that the immune system regulates cancer development is now well established. An overwhelming amount of data from animal models, together with compelling data from human patients, indicate that the immune system is instrumental in scanning and irradicating tumors. Analysis of individuals with congenital or acquired immunodeficiencies or patients undergoing immunosuppressive therapy has documented a highly elevated incidence of virally induced malignancies and cancers compared with immunocompetent individuals [1-3]. During the last decade, thanks to the breakthoughts in understanding the molecular mechanisms responsible for immune activation, the tumor antigen identification, the dendritic cell biology, the immunogenecity of tumors, the immune escape mechanisms, the host-tumor relationship, we are facing a new area of tumor immunotherapy. The basic advances were translated in therapeutical applications and have changed the view of immunotherapy from "a dream scenario" to a clinical fourth modality to cancer treatments. Multiple cancer trials using active immunization with vaccines or adoptive immunotherapy have been conducted with only very limited success. There are still a number of issues that still need to be resolved including a better understanding of immune escape mechanisms. Cancer vaccines continue to be evaluated and may lead to the emergence of clinically useful new treatments. A comprehensive approach to define the intricate molecular program initiated by tumor cells to resist to escape and the immune system of the host may help in breaking down the barriers to a more adapted cancer immunotherapy.     

Biomarkers for the development of cancer vaccines: current status

Significant improvements in our knowledge of tumor immunology have resulted in more sophisticated vaccine approaches for the treatment of cancer. However, research into biomarkers that correlate with the clinical outcome of immunotherapy has lagged behind vaccine development. To this extent, very few immunological or other markers exist that can be used in clinical trials for immunotherapy. In this review, we discuss the current status of biomarker development specifically for the monitoring and development of cancer vaccines. This includes immunological biomarkers (measurement of T-cell and cytokine responses), autoimmunity as a correlate for treatment outcome, and the possible development of multiple biomarkers using high-throughput proteomics technologies. The generation of such biomarkers will allow us to make clinical decisions about patient treatment at an earlier stage and should aid in shortening the development time for vaccines.