Putative channel components for the fast-rotating sodium-driven flagellar motor of a marine bacterium.

The polar flagellum of Vibrio alginolyticus rotates remarkably fast (up to 1,700 revolutions per second) by using a motor driven by sodium ions. Two genes, motX and motY, for the sodium-driven flagellar motor have been identified in marine bacteria, Vibrio parahaemolyticus and V. alginolyticus. They have no similarity to the genes for proton-driven motors, motA and motB, whose products constitute a proton channel. MotX was proposed to be a component of a sodium channel. Here we identified additional sodium motor genes, pomA and pomB, in V. alginolyticus. Unexpectedly, PomA and PomB have similarities to MotA and MotB, respectively, especially in the predicted transmembrane regions. These results suggest that PomA and PomB may be sodium-conducting channel components of the sodium-driven motor and that the motor part consists of the products of at least four genes, pomA, pomB, motX, and motY. Furthermore, swimming speed was controlled by the expression level of the pomA gene, suggesting that newly synthesized PomA proteins, which are components of a force-generating unit, were successively integrated into the defective motor complexes. These findings imply that Na+-driven flagellar motors may have similar structure and function as proton-driven motors, but with some interesting differences as well, and it is possible to compare and study the coupling mechanisms of the sodium and proton ion flux for the force generation.     

Cloning and characterization of motX, a Vibrio alginolyticus sodium-driven flagellar motor gene.

Four motor proteins, MotX, MotY, PomA, and PomB, have been identified as constituents of the Na(+)-driven flagellum of Vibrio species. In this study, the complete motX gene was cloned from Vibrio alginolyticus and shown to complement three mot mutations, motX94, motX115, and motX119, as well as a V. parahaemolyticus motX mutant. The motX94 mutant contains a frameshift at Val86 of MotX, while the motX115 and motX119 mutations comprise substitutions of Ala146 to Val and Gln 194 to amber, respectively. When MotX was overexpressed in Vibrio cells, the amount of MotY detected in the membrane fraction increased, and vice versa, suggesting that MotX and MotY mutually stabilize each other by interacting at the membrane level. When a plasmid containing the motX gene was introduced into motY mutants NMB117 (motY117) and VIO542 (motY542), the mutations were suppressed. In contrast, motY could not cause the recovery of any swarm-defective motX mutants studied. Considering the above evidence, we propose that MotX is more directly involved than MotY in the mechanical functioning of the Na(+)-type flagellar motor, and that MotY may stabilize MotX to support its interaction with other Mot proteins.     

Interactions of MotX with MotY and with the PomA/PomB sodium ion channel complex of the Vibrio alginolyticus polar flagellum

Rotation of the sodium ion-driven polar flagellum of Vibrio alginolyticus requires the inner membrane sodium ion channel complex PomA/PomB and the outer membrane components MotX and MotY. None of the detergents used in this study were able to solubilize MotX when it was expressed alone. However, when co-expressed with MotY, MotX was solubilized by some detergents. The change in the solubility of MotX suggests that MotY interacts with MotX. In agreement with this, a pull-down assay showed the association of MotY with MotX. Solubilized MotX and MotY eluted in the void volume from a gel-filtration column, suggesting that MotX and MotY form a large oligomeric structure(s). In the absence of MotY, MotX affected membrane localization of the PomA/PomB complex and of PomB alone but not of PomA alone, suggesting an interaction between MotX and PomB. We propose that MotX exhibits multiple interactions with the other motor components, first with MotY for its localization to the outer membrane and then with the PomA/PomB complex through PomB for the motor rotation.     

Functional reconstitution of the Na(+)-driven polar flagellar motor component of Vibrio alginolyticus

The bacterial flagellar motor is a molecular machine that couples the influx of specific ions to the generation of the force necessary to drive rotation of the flagellar filament. Four integral membrane proteins, PomA, PomB, MotX, and MotY, have been suggested to be directly involved in torque generation of the Na(+)-driven polar flagellar motor of Vibrio alginolyticus. In the present study, we report the isolation of the functional component of the torque-generating unit. The purified protein complex appears to consist of PomA and PomB and contains neither MotX nor MotY. The PomA/B protein, reconstituted into proteoliposomes, catalyzed (22)Na(+) influx in response to a potassium diffusion potential. Sodium uptake was abolished by the presence of Li(+) ions and phenamil, a sodium channel blocker. This is the first demonstration of a purification and functional reconstitution of the bacterial flagellar motor component involved in torque generation. In addition, this study demonstrates that the Na(+)-driven motor component, PomA and PomB, forms the Na(+)-conducting channel.     

Ion-coupling determinants of Na+-driven and H+-driven flagellar motors

The bacterial flagellar motor is a tiny molecular machine that uses a transmembrane flux of H(+) or Na(+) ions to drive flagellar rotation. In proton-driven motors, the membrane proteins MotA and MotB interact via their transmembrane regions to form a proton channel. The sodium-driven motors that power the polar flagellum of Vibrio species contain homologs of MotA and MotB, called PomA and PomB. They require the unique proteins MotX and MotY. In this study, we investigated how ion selectivity is determined in proton and sodium motors. We found that Escherichia coli MotA/B restore motility in DeltapomAB Vibrio alginolyticus. Most hypermotile segregants isolated from this weakly motile strain contain mutations in motB. We constructed proteins in which segments of MotB were fused to complementary portions of PomB. A chimera joining the N terminus of PomB to the periplasmic C terminus of MotB (PotB7(E)) functioned with PomA as the stator of a sodium motor, with or without MotX/Y. This stator (PomA/PotB7(E)) supported sodium-driven motility in motA or motB E.coli cells, and the swimming speed was even higher than with the original stator of E.coli MotA/B. We conclude that the cytoplasmic and transmembrane domains of PomA/B are sufficient for sodium-driven motility. However, MotA expressed with a B subunit containing the N terminus of MotB fused to the periplasmic domain of PomB (MomB7(E)) supported sodium-driven motility in a MotX/Y-dependent fashion. Thus, although the periplasmic domain of PomB is not necessary for sodium-driven motility in a PomA/B motor, it can convert a MotA/B proton motor into a sodium motor.     

Requirements for conversion of the Na(+)-driven flagellar motor of Vibrio cholerae to the H(+)-driven motor of Escherichia coli

Bacterial flagella are powered by a motor that converts a transmembrane electrochemical potential of either H(+) or Na(+) into mechanical work. In Escherichia coli, the MotA and MotB proteins form the stator and function in proton translocation, whereas the FliG protein is located on the rotor and is involved in flagellar assembly and torque generation. The sodium-driven polar flagella of Vibrio species contain homologs of MotA and MotB, called PomA and PomB, and also contain two other membrane proteins called MotX and MotY, which are essential for motor rotation and that might also function in ion conduction. Deletions in pomA, pomB, motX, or motY in Vibrio cholerae resulted in a nonmotile phenotype, whereas deletion of fliG gave a nonflagellate phenotype. fliG genes on plasmids complemented fliG-null strains of the parent species but not fliG-null strains of the other species. FliG-null strains were complemented by chimeric FliG proteins in which the C-terminal domain came from the other species, however, implying that the C-terminal part of FliG can function in conjunction with the ion-translocating components of either species. A V. cholerae strain deleted of pomA, pomB, motX, and motY became weakly motile when the E. coli motA and motB genes were introduced on a plasmid. Like E. coli, but unlike wild-type V. cholerae, motility of some V. cholerae strains containing the hybrid motor was inhibited by the protonophore carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone under neutral as well as alkaline conditions but not by the sodium motor-specific inhibitor phenamil. We conclude that the E. coli proton motor components MotA and MotB can function in place of the motor proteins of V. cholerae and that the hybrid motors are driven by the proton motive force.     

MotX and MotY,specific components of the sodium-driven flagellar motor,colocalize to the outer membrane in Vibrio alginolyticus

Rotation of the sodium-driven polar flagella of Vibrio alginolyticus requires four motor proteins: PomA, PomB, MotX and MotY. MotX and MotY, which are unique components of the sodium-driven motor of Vibrio, have been believed to be localized in the inner (cytoplasmic) membrane via their N-terminal hydrophobic segments. Here we show that MotX and MotY colocalize to the outer membrane. Both proteins, when expressed together, were detected in the outer membrane fraction separated by sucrose density gradient centrifugation. As mature MotX and MotY proteins do not have N-terminal hydrophobic segments, the N-termini of the primary translation products must have signal sequences that are removed upon translocation across the inner membrane. Moreover, MotX and MotY require each other for efficient localization to the outer membrane. Based on these lines of evidence, we propose that MotX and MotY form a complex in the outer membrane. This is the first case that describes motor proteins function in the outer membrane for flagellar rotation.     

Structure of the flagellar motor protein complex PomAB: implications for the torque-generating conformation

The bacterial flagellar motor is driven by an ion flux through a channel called MotAB in Escherichia coli or Salmonella and PomAB in Vibrio alginolyticus. PomAB is composed of two transmembrane (TM) components, PomA and PomB, and converts a sodium ion flux to rotation of the flagellum. Its homolog, MotAB, utilizes protons instead of sodium ions. PomB/MotB has a peptidoglycan (PG)-binding motif in the periplasmic domain, allowing it to function as the stator by being anchored to the PG layer. To generate torque, PomAB/MotAB is thought to undergo a conformational change triggered by the ion flux and to interact directly with FliG, a component of the rotor. Here, we present the first three-dimensional structure of this torque-generating stator unit analyzed by electron microscopy. The structure of PomAB revealed two arm domains, which contain the PG-binding site, connected to a large base made of the TM and cytoplasmic domains. The arms lean downward to the membrane surface, likely representing a "plugged" conformation, which would prevent ions leaking through the channel. We propose a model for how PomAB units are placed around the flagellar basal body to function as torque generators.     

Hybrid Motor with H+- and Na+-Driven Components Can Rotate Vibrio Polar Flagella by Using Sodium Ions

The bacterial flagellar motor is a molecular machine that converts ion flux across the membrane into flagellar rotation. The coupling ion is either a proton or a sodium ion. The polar flagellar motor of the marine bacterium Vibrio alginolyticus is driven by sodium ions, and the four protein components, PomA, PomB, MotX, and MotY, are essential for motor function. Among them, PomA and PomB are similar to MotA and MotB of the proton-driven motors, respectively. PomA shows greatest similarity to MotA of the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides. MotA is composed of 253 amino acids, the same length as PomA, and 40% of its residues are identical to those of PomA. R. sphaeroides MotB has high similarity only to the transmembrane region of PomB. To examine whether the R. sphaeroides motor genes can function in place of the pomA and pomB genes of V. alginolyticus, we constructed plasmids including both motA and motB or motA alone and transformed them into missense and null pomA-paralyzed mutants of V. alginolyticus. The transformants from both strains showed restored motility, although the swimming speeds were low. On the other hand, pomB mutants were not restored to motility by any plasmid containing motA and/or motB. Next, we tested which ions (proton or sodium) coupled to the hybrid motor function. The motor did not work in sodium-free buffer and was inhibited by phenamil and amiloride, sodium motor-specific inhibitors, but not by a protonophore. Thus, we conclude that the proton motor component, MotA, of R. sphaeroides can generate torque by coupling with the sodium ion flux in place of PomA of V. alginolyticus.     

Specificity of motor components in the dual flagellar system of Shewanella putrefaciens CN-32

Bacterial flagellar motors are intricate nanomachines in which the stator units and rotor component FliM may be dynamically exchanged during function. Similar to other bacterial species, the gammaproteobacterium Shewanella putrefaciens CN-32 possesses a complete secondary flagellar system along with a corresponding stator unit. Expression of the secondary system occurs during planktonic growth in complex media and leads to the formation of a subpopulation with one or more additional flagella at random positions in addition to the primary polar system. We used physiological and phenotypic characterizations of defined mutants in concert with fluorescent microscopy on labelled components of the two different systems, the stator proteins PomB and MotB, the rotor components FliM(1) and FliM(2), and the auxiliary motor components MotX and MotY, to determine localization, function and dynamics of the proteins in the flagellar motors. The results demonstrate that the polar flagellum is driven by a Na(+)-dependent FliM(1)/PomAB/MotX/MotY flagellar motor while the secondary system is rotated by a H(+)-dependent FliM(2)/MotAB motor. The components were highly specific for their corresponding motor and are unlikely to be extensively swapped or shared between the two flagellar systems under planktonic conditions. The results have implications for both specificity and dynamics of flagellar motor components.     

Torque and switching in the bacterial flagellar motor. An electrostatic model.

A model is presented for the rotary motor that drives bacterial flagella, using the electrochemical gradient of protons across the cytoplasmic membrane. The model unifies several concepts present in previous models. Torque is generated by proton-conducting particles around the perimeter of the rotor at the base of the flagellum. Protons in channels formed by these particles interact electrostatically with tilted lines of charges on the rotor, providing "loose coupling" between proton flux and rotation of the flagellum. Computer simulations of the model correctly predict the experimentally observed dynamic properties of the motor. Unlike previous models, the motor presented here may rotate either way for a given direction of the protonmotive force. The direction of rotation only depends on the level of occupancy of the proton channels. This suggests a novel and simple mechanism for the switching between clockwise and counterclockwise rotation that is the basis of bacterial chemotaxis.     

Multimeric structure of PomA, a component of the Na+-driven polar flagellar motor of vibrio alginolyticus

Four integral membrane proteins, PomA, PomB, MotX, and MotY, are thought to be directly involved in torque generation of the Na(+)-driven polar flagellar motor of Vibrio alginolyticus. Our previous study showed that PomA and PomB form a complex, which catalyzes sodium influx in response to a potassium diffusion potential. PomA forms a stable dimer when expressed in a PomB null mutant. To explore the possible functional dependence of PomA domains in adjacent subunits, we prepared a series of PomA dimer fusions containing different combinations of wild-type or mutant subunits. Introduction of the mutation P199L, which completely inactivates flagellar rotation, into either the first or the second half of the dimer abolished motility. The P199L mutation in monomeric PomA also altered the PomA-PomB interaction. PomA dimer with the P199L mutation even in one subunit also had no ability to interact with PomB, indicating that the both subunits in the dimer are required for the functional interaction between PomA and PomB. Flagellar rotation by wild-type PomA dimer was completely inactivated by phenamil, a sodium channel blocker. However, activity was retained in the presence of phenamil when either half of the dimer was replaced with a phenamil-resistant subunit, indicating that both subunits must bind phenamil for motility to be fully inhibited. These observations demonstrate that both halves of the PomA dimer function together to generate the torque for flagellar rotation.     

Roles of charged residues of rotor and stator in flagellar rotation: comparative study using H+-driven and Na+-driven motors in Escherichia coli

In Escherichia coli, rotation of the flagellar motor has been shown to depend upon electrostatic interactions between charged residues of the stator protein MotA and the rotor protein FliG. These charged residues are conserved in the Na+-driven polar flagellum of Vibrio alginolyticus, but mutational studies in V. alginolyticus suggested that they are relatively unimportant for motor rotation. The electrostatic interactions detected in E. coli therefore might not be a general feature of flagellar motors, or, alternatively, the V. alginolyticus motor might rely on similar interactions but incorporate additional features that make it more robust against mutation. Here, we have carried out a comparative study of chimeric motors that were resident in E. coli but engineered to use V. alginolyticus stator components, rotor components, or both. Charged residues in the V. alginolyticus rotor and stator proteins were found to be essential for motor rotation when the proteins functioned in the setting of the E. coli motor. Patterns of synergism and suppression in rotor/stator double mutants indicate that the V. alginolyticus proteins interact in essentially the same way as their counterparts in E. coli. The robustness of the rotor-stator interface in V. alginolyticus is in part due to the presence of additional charged residues in PomA but appears mainly due to other factors, because an E. coli motor using both rotor and stator components from V. alginolyticus remained sensitive to mutation. Motor function in V. alginolyticus may be enhanced by the proteins MotX and MotY.     

MotX and MotY Are Required for Flagellar Rotation in Shewanella oneidensis MR-1

The single polar flagellum of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 is powered by two different stator complexes, the sodium-dependent PomAB and the proton-driven MotAB. In addition, Shewanella harbors two genes with homology to motX and motY of Vibrio species. In Vibrio, the products of these genes are crucial for sodium-dependent flagellar rotation. Resequencing of S. oneidensis MR-1 motY revealed that the gene does not harbor an authentic frameshift as was originally reported. Mutational analysis demonstrated that both MotX and MotY are critical for flagellar rotation of S. oneidensis MR-1 for both sodium- and proton-dependent stator systems but do not affect assembly of the flagellar filament. Fluorescence tagging of MotX and MotY to mCherry revealed that both proteins localize to the flagellated cell pole depending on the presence of the basal flagellar structure. Functional localization of MotX requires MotY, whereas MotY localizes independently of MotX. In contrast to the case in Vibrio, neither protein is crucial for the recruitment of the PomAB or MotAB stator complexes to the flagellated cell pole, nor do they play a major role in the stator selection process. Thus, MotX and MotY are not exclusive features of sodium-dependent flagellar systems. Furthermore, MotX and MotY in Shewanella, and possibly also in other genera, must have functions beyond the recruitment of the stator complexes.Flagellum-mediated swimming motility is a widespread means of locomotion among bacteria. Flagella consist of protein filaments that are rotated at the filament''s base by a membrane-embedded motor (3, 39). Rotation is powered by electrochemical gradients across the cytoplasmic membrane. Thus far, two coupling ions, sodium ions and protons, have been described as energy sources for bacterial flagellar motors (4, 24, 48). Two major components confer the conversion of the ion flux into rotary motion. The first component forms a rotor-mounted ring-like structure at the base of the flagellar basal body and is referred to as the switch complex or the C ring; it is composed of the proteins FliG, FliM, and FliN. The second major component is the stator system, consisting of membrane-embedded stator complexes that surround the C ring (3). Each stator complex is composed of two subunits in a 4:2 stoichiometry. In Escherichia coli, MotA and MotB constitute the stator complex by forming a proton-specific ion channel; the Na⁺-dependent counterpart in Vibrio species consists of the orthologs PomA and PomB (1, 5, 49). MotA and PomA both have four transmembrane domains and are thought to interact with FliG via a cytoplasmic segment to generate torque (2, 50). Stator function is presumably made possible by a peptidoglycan-binding motif located at the C-terminal portion of MotB and PomB that anchors the stator complex to the cell wall (1, 8). In E. coli, at least 11 stator complexes can be synchronously involved in driving flagellar rotation (35). However, a single complex is sufficient for rotation of the filament (36, 40). Despite its tight attachment to the peptidoglycan, the stator ring system was found to form a surprisingly dynamic complex. It has been suggested that inactive precomplexes of the stators form a membrane-located pool before being activated upon incorporation into the stator ring system around the motor (13, 45). In E. coli, the turnover time of stator complexes can be as short as 30 s (21).In Vibrio species, two auxiliary proteins, designated MotX and MotY, are required for motor function of the Na⁺-driven polar flagellar system (22, 23, 28, 31). Recently, it was shown that the proteins associate with the flagellar basal body in Vibrio alginolyticus to form an additional structure, the T ring (42). MotX interacts with MotY and the PomAB stator complexes, and both proteins are thought to be crucial for the acquisition of the stators to the motor of the polar flagellum. (29, 30, 42). A MotY homolog is also associated with the proton-dependent motor system of the lateral flagella of V. alginolyticus that is induced under conditions of elevated viscosity (41).We recently showed that Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 uses two different stator systems to drive the rotation of its single polar flagellum, the Na⁺-dependent PomAB stator and the proton-driven MotAB stator. As suggested by genetic data, the MotAB stator has been acquired by lateral gene transfer, presumably in the process of adaptation from a marine to a freshwater environment (32). The two different stators are recruited to the motor in a way that depends on the sodium ion concentration in the medium. The Na⁺-dependent PomAB stator is present at the flagellated cell pole regardless of the sodium ion concentration, whereas the proton-dependent MotAB stator functionally localizes only under conditions of low sodium or in the absence of PomAB. It is still unclear how stator selection is achieved and whether additional proteins play a role in this process.Orthologs of motX and motY have been annotated in S. oneidensis MR-1. We thus hypothesized that MotX and MotY might play a role in stator selection in S. oneidensis MR-1. However, the originally published sequence of motY harbors a frameshift that would result in a drastically truncated protein lacking a functionally relevant putative peptidoglycan-binding domain at its C terminus (16, 18). This situation seemed inconsistent with a role for MotY in S. oneidensis MR-1.Here we describe a functional analysis of the MotX and MotY orthologs in S. oneidensis MR-1. We found that motY does not, in fact, contain a frameshift mutation, so that MotY is translated in its full-length form. Both MotX and MotY were essential for Na⁺-dependent and proton-dependent motility. Therefore, these proteins have a role in S. oneidensis MR-1 that differs from their function in Vibrio species. We also used fusions to the fluorescent protein mCherry for functional localization studies of MotX and MotY.     

Electron cryomicroscopic visualization of PomA/B stator units of the sodium-driven flagellar motor in liposomes

A motor protein complex of the bacterial flagellum, PomA/B from Vibrio alginolyticus, was reconstituted into liposomes and visualized by electron cryomicroscopy. PomA/B is a sodium channel, composed of two membrane proteins, PomA and PomB, and converts ion flux to the rotation of the flagellar motor. Escherichia coli and Salmonella have a homolog called MotA/B, which utilizes proton instead of sodium ion. PomB and MotB have a peptidoglycan-binding motif in their C-terminal region, and therefore PomA/B and MotA/B are regarded as the stator. Energy filtering electron cryomicroscopy enhanced the image contrast of the proteins reconstituted into liposomes and showed that two extramembrane domains with clearly different sizes stick out of the lipid bilayers on opposite sides. Image analysis combined with gold labeling and deletion of the peptidoglycan-binding motif revealed that the longer one, approximately 70 A long, is likely to correspond to the periplasmic domain, and the other, about half size, to the cytoplasmic domain.     

Sodium‐powered stators of the bacterial flagellar motor can generate torque in the presence of phenamil with mutations near the peptidoglycan‐binding region

The bacterial flagellar motor powers the rotation that propels the swimming bacteria. Rotational torque is generated by harnessing the flow of ions through ion channels known as stators which couple the energy from the ion gradient across the inner membrane to rotation of the rotor. Here, we used error‐prone PCR to introduce single point mutations into the sodium‐powered Vibrio alginolyticus/Escherichia coli chimeric stator PotB and selected for motors that exhibited motility in the presence of the sodium‐channel inhibitor phenamil. We found single mutations that enable motility under phenamil occurred at two sites: (i) the transmembrane domain of PotB, corresponding to the TM region of the PomB stator from V. alginolyticus and (ii) near the peptidoglycan binding region that corresponds to the C‐terminal region of the MotB stator from E. coli. Single cell rotation assays confirmed that individual flagellar motors could rotate in up to 100 µM phenamil. Using phylogenetic logistic regression, we found correlation between natural residue variation and ion source at positions corresponding to PotB F22Y, but not at other sites. Our results demonstrate that it is not only the pore region of the stator that moderates motility in the presence of ion‐channel blockers.     

Polar flagellum biogenesis in Aeromonas hydrophila

Mesophilic Aeromonas spp. constitutively express a single polar flagellum that helps the bacteria move to more favorable environments and is an important virulence and colonization factor. Certain strains can also produce multiple lateral flagella in semisolid media or over surfaces. We have previously reported 16 genes (flgN to flgL) that constitute region 1 of the Aeromonas hydrophila AH-3 polar flagellum biogenesis gene clusters. We identified 39 new polar flagellum genes distributed in four noncontiguous chromosome regions (regions 2 to 5). Region 2 contained six genes (flaA to maf-1), including a modification accessory factor gene (maf-1) that has not been previously reported and is thought to be involved in glycosylation of polar flagellum filament. Region 3 contained 29 genes (fliE to orf29), most of which are involved in flagellum basal body formation and chemotaxis. Region 4 contained a single gene involved in the motor stator formation (motX), and region 5 contained the three master regulatory genes for the A. hydrophila polar flagella (flrA to flrC). Mutations in the flaH, maf-1, fliM, flhA, fliA, and flrC genes, as well as the double mutant flaA flaB, all caused loss of polar flagella and reduction in adherence and biofilm formation. A defined mutation in the pomB stator gene did not affect polar flagellum motility, in contrast to the motX mutant, which was unable to swim even though it expressed a polar flagellum. Mutations in all of these genes did not affect lateral flagellum synthesis or swarming motility, showing that both A. hydrophila flagellum systems are entirely distinct.     

Swimming behaviour of the unicellular biflagellate Oxyrrhis marina: in vivo and in vitro movement of the two flagella

The movement of the 2 flagella of Oxyrrhis marina was examined with respect to their individual waveforms and the swimming behavior of the organism. The longitudinal flagella propagated helicoidal waves whose amplitude decreased toward the tip of th flagellum. Their beat frequencies were 50-60 Hz. The transverse flagella beat helicoidally within a furrow. Sudden changes in the direction of the cell trajectories were generated by transient arrests of the longitudinal flagellum beat, which were accompanied by a switch from the backward orientation to a forward one. This sweeping motion generated the rotation of the cell body. Ca2+ ions highly stimulated the frequencies of this arrest response, which compared to the "walking-stick" behavior of sea urchin spermatozoa. Isolated flagella were ATA-reactivated after detergent treatment. They exhibited 2 types of motion within the same experimental conditions. A progressive helicoidal motion was generated upon longitudinal flagellum reactivation, whereas a rolling motion with little progression characterized transverse flagellum reactivation. The differences in motile behavior reflect regulations of flagellar movement which were not destroyed by the isolation procedure and may be indicative of regulation by accessory structures.