A human autophagy interaction network

The original “Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy in higher eukaryotes” has been well received and used by many researchers and authors. I consider these to be very important guidelines that require a consensus among the researchers in the field, because they are used by authors to defend against inappropriate reviewers’ comments, and by reviewers to point out to editors the flaws in research papers. Accordingly, I decided it was time to revise and update the guidelines. After all, the field has expanded substantially, as has the range of model systems being used to analyze autophagy. As a result, the list of authors has similarly increased. In addition, this version of the guidelines is not limited to higher eukaryotes nor to macroautophagy. Here, I explain the approach used to invite authors to participate in the revised guidelines, and briefly demonstrate one aspect of their utility.     

Coming soon to a journal near you—The updated guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy

In 2008 we published the first guidelines paper for monitoring autophagy and interpreting the data resulting from the various assays used in our field. The guidelines paper was substantially expanded and updated in 2012. Based on the number of citations, and on comments from many users, I think it is accurate to say that the guidelines have been very useful for many researchers. Because the field continues to undergo rapid development, it is necessary to update the guidelines once again.     

Coming soon to a journal near you—The updated guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy

In 2008 we published the first guidelines paper for monitoring autophagy and interpreting the data resulting from the various assays used in our field. The guidelines paper was substantially expanded and updated in 2012. Based on the number of citations, and on comments from many users, I think it is accurate to say that the guidelines have been very useful for many researchers. Because the field continues to undergo rapid development, it is necessary to update the guidelines once again.     

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy

In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. A key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process vs. those that measure flux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process); thus, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation needs to be differentiated from stimuli that result in increased autophagic activity, defined as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (in most higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the field understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular autophagy assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field.     

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy

In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. A key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process vs. those that measure flux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process); thus, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation needs to be differentiated from stimuli that result in increased autophagic activity, defined as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (in most higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the field understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular autophagy assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field.     

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy in higher eukaryotes

Research in autophagy continues to accelerate,(1) and as a result many new scientists are entering the field. Accordingly, it is important to establish a standard set of criteria for monitoring macroautophagy in different organisms. Recent reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose.(2,3) There are many useful and convenient methods that can be used to monitor macroautophagy in yeast, but relatively few in other model systems, and there is much confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure macroautophagy in higher eukaryotes. A key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers of autophagosomes versus those that measure flux through the autophagy pathway; thus, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation needs to be differentiated from fully functional autophagy that includes delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (in most higher eukaryotes) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of the methods that can be used by investigators who are attempting to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as by reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that investigate these processes. This set of guidelines is not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to verify an autophagic response.     

Developing a set of guidelines for your research field: a practical approach

Since 2008, the autophagy community has periodically published a set of guidelines, currently titled “Guidelines for the Use and Interpretation of Assays for Monitoring Autophagy.” The newest version of the guidelines was published in 2016. There are many reasons for establishing a set of guidelines in a given research field. This Perspective explores some of these reasons, including standardizing nomenclature for better communication, improving reproducibility, and making it easier for newcomers to enter the field. It also includes the approach I have used to generate and update the guidelines that are now widely used in the autophagy field. The suggestions are not meant to be formulaic, and the method is certainly not perfect. Instead, this should be viewed as a starting set of, well, guidelines.     

The Role of Autophagy During Development in Higher Eukaryotes

Autophagy is a lysosome‐mediated degradation pathway used by eukaryotes to recycle cytosolic components in both basal and stress conditions. Several genes have been described as regulators of autophagy, many of them being evolutionarily conserved from yeast to mammals. The study of autophagy‐defective model systems has made it possible to highlight the importance of correctly functioning autophagic machinery in the development of invertebrates as, for example, during the complex events of fly and worm metamorphosis. In vertebrates, on the other hand, autophagy defects can be lethal for the animal if the mutated gene is involved in the early stages of development, or can lead to severe phenotypes if the mutation affects later stages. However, in both lower and higher eukaryotes, autophagy seems to be crucial during embryogenesis by acting in tissue remodeling in parallel with apoptosis. An increase of autophagic cells is, in fact, observed in the embryonic stages characterized by massive cell elimination. Moreover, autophagic processes probably protect cells during metabolic stress and nutrient paucity that occur during tissue remodeling. In light of such evidence, it can be concluded that there is a close interplay between autophagy and the processes of cell death, proliferation and differentiation that determine the development of higher eukaryotes.     

Autophagic Processes in Yeast: Mechanism,Machinery and Regulation

Autophagy refers to a group of processes that involve degradation of cytoplasmic components including cytosol, macromolecular complexes, and organelles, within the vacuole or the lysosome of higher eukaryotes. The various types of autophagy have attracted increasing attention for at least two reasons. First, autophagy provides a compelling example of dynamic rearrangements of subcellular membranes involving issues of protein trafficking and organelle identity, and thus it is fascinating for researchers interested in questions pertinent to basic cell biology. Second, autophagy plays a central role in normal development and cell homeostasis, and, as a result, autophagic dysfunctions are associated with a range of illnesses including cancer, diabetes, myopathies, some types of neurodegeneration, and liver and heart diseases. That said, this review focuses on autophagy in yeast. Many aspects of autophagy are conserved from yeast to human; in particular, this applies to the gene products mediating these pathways as well as some of the signaling cascades regulating it, so that the information we relate is relevant to higher eukaryotes. Indeed, as with many cellular pathways, the initial molecular insights were made possible due to genetic studies in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and other fungi.     

A reagent forum

My lab works with the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, but I frequently get asked questions regarding autophagy reagents for use in higher eukaryotic systems. For example, "Which anti-LC3 antiserum works well in HEK293 cells"? Occasionally I know the answer, or an answer, but not always. Sometimes the information is available in the literature, but it can be difficult to find. With the ever-growing community of autophagy researchers, however, I suspect that many more reagents have been tested, and in many cases not reported. Therefore, I think it would be useful to establish a list of reagents (in particular, antisera and inhibitors) with company-specific information (name and catalog number) that can save other researchers valuable time and money. Autophagy will post the information in the form of a WIKI to allow updates and comments from users.

For example:

Reagent: anti-LC3

Company: Count On Us

Catalog number: 01234

Comments:

Dan Klionsky: I used this antibody and had a very good result (good sensitivity with low background) on protein extracts from mouse.

Danny Klionsky: I also had a good result with this antibody, and found that a higher dilution (1:3,000) worked just as well with rat liver protein extract.

Daniel J. Klionsky: This antibody did not work for yeast Atg8.

We plan to start the WIKI in August 2008, but its success depends entirely on your participation. Please check for the start of this site, and upload your entries. I am open to suggestions for improvements of the site that will make it more useful for autophagy researchers.

http://www.landesbioscience.com/reagent_blog/     

脂肪组织中自噬信号通路及其功能

细胞自噬是一种真核生物中高度保守的代谢过程,包括巨自噬、微自噬以及分子伴侣介导的自噬等。自噬过程可以清除受损的细胞器,降解糖原、脂类和蛋白质等生物大分子物质,供细胞重新利用,维持细胞内代谢平衡。自噬障碍与多种疾病的病理发生过程息息相关,包括肿瘤、2型糖尿病、肥胖、骨骼肌病以及神经退行性疾病等。脂肪组织是人体脂质储存的重要场所,广泛分布于全身各处,如内脏和皮下等。脂肪组织通过储存冗余脂肪并分泌脂肪因子,防止脂肪的异位堆积和脂毒性的发生,维持机体的脂质稳态。近期的许多研究表明,自噬进程深度参与脂肪细胞的细胞分化与能量代谢。因此,深入探究脂肪组织自噬过程与机体脂质稳态的调控关系,有利于揭示机体脂质平衡的内在机制,为新型药物靶点的开发提供扎实的理论依据和数据支持。本文就近年来关于自噬影响脂肪组织脂质代谢的最新研究进展作一综述。     

Eating on the fly: function and regulation of autophagy during cell growth, survival and death in Drosophila

Significant progress has been made over recent years in defining the normal progression and regulation of autophagy, particularly in cultured mammalian cells and yeast model systems. However, apart from a few notable exceptions, our understanding of the physiological roles of autophagy has lagged behind these advances, and identification of components and features of autophagy unique to higher eukaryotes also remains a challenge. In this review we describe recent insights into the roles and control mechanisms of autophagy gained from in vivo studies in Drosophila. We focus on potential roles of autophagy in controlling cell growth and death, and describe how the regulation of autophagy has evolved to include metazoan-specific signaling pathways. We discuss genetic screening approaches that are being used to identify novel regulators and effectors of autophagy, and speculate about areas of research in this system likely to bear fruit in future studies.     

Eating on the fly: Function and regulation of autophagy during cell growth,survival and death in Drosophila

Significant progress has been made over recent years in defining the normal progression and regulation of autophagy, particularly in cultured mammalian cells and yeast model systems. However, apart from a few notable exceptions, our understanding of the physiological roles of autophagy has lagged behind these advances, and identification of components and features of autophagy unique to higher eukaryotes also remains a challenge. In this review we describe recent insights into the roles and control mechanisms of autophagy gained from in vivo studies in Drosophila. We focus on potential roles of autophagy in controlling cell growth and death, and describe how the regulation of autophagy has evolved to include metazoan-specific signaling pathways. We discuss genetic screening approaches that are being used to identify novel regulators and effectors of autophagy, and speculate about areas of research in this system likely to bear fruit in future studies.     

Methods for Monitoring Autophagy from Yeast to Human

The increasing interest in autophagy in a wide range of organisms, accompanied by an ever-growing influx of researchers into this field, necessitates a good understanding of the methodologies available to monitor this process. In this review we discuss current approaches that can be used to follow the overall process of autophagy, as well as individual steps, from yeast to human. The majority of the review considers methods that apply to macroautophagy; however, we also consider alternative types of degradation including chaperone-mediated autophagy and microautophagy. This information is meant to provide a resource for newcomers as well as a stimulus for experienced researchers who may be prompted to develop additional assays to examine autophagy-related pathways.     

Autophagy: from basic research to its application in food biotechnology

Autophagy is a catabolic process by which the cytoplasm is sequestered into double-membrane vesicles and delivered to the lysosome/vacuole for breaking down and recycling of the low molecular weight degradation products. The isolation in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae of many of the genes involved in autophagy constituted a milestone in understanding the molecular bases of this pathway. The identification of ortholog genes in other eukaryotic models revealed that the mechanism of autophagy is conserved among all eukaryotes. This pathway has been shown to be involved in a growing number of physiological processes and conversely, its deregulation may contribute to the development of several diseases. Recent reports have also shown that autophagy may play an important role in biotechnological processes related with the food industry. In this review we discuss current knowledge of the molecular mechanism of autophagy, including some applied aspects of autophagy in the field of food biotechnology.     

Autophagosome formation in mammalian cells

Macroautophagy is an intracellular degradation system for the majority of proteins and some organelles. The molecular mechanism of autophagy has been extensively studied using the yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, during these past 10 years. These studies suggested that the molecular machinery of autophagosome formation is well conserved from yeast to higher eukaryotes. Identification and characterization of the mammalian counterparts of the yeast autophagy proteins has facilitated our understanding of mammalian autophagy, particularly of autophagosome formation. These findings are now being applied to studies on the physiological roles of autophagy in mammals.     

Methods for monitoring autophagy from yeast to human

The increasing interest in autophagy in a wide range of organisms, accompanied by an ever-growing influx of researchers into this field, necessitates a good understanding of the methodologies available to monitor this process. In this review we discuss current approaches that can be used to follow the overall process of autophagy, as well as individual steps, from yeast to human. The majority of the review considers methods that apply to macroautophagy; however, we also consider alternative types of degradation including chaperone-mediated autophagy and microautophagy. This information is meant to provide a resource for newcomers as well as a stimulus for experienced researchers who may be prompted to develop additional assays to examine autophagy-related pathways.     

自噬的分子细胞机制研究进展

自噬是真核细胞中进化上高度保守的、用于降解和回收利用细胞内生物大分子和受损细胞器的过程。自噬的完成依赖于正常的溶酶体功能,与机体的多种生理和病理过程密切相关。自噬研究已成为当前生命科学研究的热点,揭示自噬的发生机制、自噬与疾病发生的关系对预防与治疗多种人类重大疾病具有重要意义。该文旨在概括目前自噬的研究进展,重点介绍细胞自噬的发生机制及其与疾病的关系。