Light meromyosin paracrystal formation

Studies of paracrystal formation by column purified light meromyosin (LMM) prepared in a variety of ways led to the following conclusions: (a) different portions of the myosin rod may be coded for different stagger relationships. This was concluded from observations that paracrystals with different axial repeat periodicities could be obtained either with LMM framents of different lengths prepared with the same enzyme, or with LMM fragments of identical lengths but prepared with different enzymes. (b) Paracrystals with a 14-nm axial repeat periodicity are most likely formed by the aggregation of sheets with a 44-nm axial repeat within the sheets which are staggered by 14 nm. All of the axial repeat patterns expected from one sheet or aggregates of more than one sheet, on this basis, were observed in the same electron micrograph. (c) C-protein binding probably occurs preferentially to LMM molecules related in some specific way. This was concluded from the observation that the same axial repeat pattern was obtained in paracrystals formed from different LMM preparations in the presence of C-protein, regardless of differences in the axial repeat obtained in the absence of C-protein. (d) Nucleic acid is responsible for the 43-nm axial repeat patterns observed in paracrystals formed by the ethanol-resistant fraction of LMM. In the absence of nuclei acid, paracrystals with a 14nm axial repeat are obtained. (e) The 43-nm axial repeat pattern observed with the ethanol-resistant fraction of LMM is different for LMM preparations obtained by trypsin and papain digestions.     

The tryptic digestion of spin-labelled heavy meromyosin

The S₁ thiol groups of heavy meromyosin (HMM) have been selectively spin labeled with a paramagnetic analog of iodoacetamide (10) and the effects of tryptic digestion on the ESR spectrum and ATPase activity have been studied. The loss of ATPase activity on tryptic digestion occurs at the same rate with spin-labeled or unlabeled HMM suggesting that spin labeling produces no major change in the conformation of HMM. ESR spectra indicate that spin labels bound to S₁ groups of HMM are strongly immobilized; spectra of subfragment-1 isolated from tryptic digests of spin-labeled HMM are the same as those of labeled HMM. ESR spectra of S₁-spin-labeled peptides produced by tryptic digestion of HMM indicate essentially no immobilization of labels, the spectra being similar to that of a solution of free labels. The ESR spectrum of an unfractionated digest of HMM exhibits a peak attributable to strongly immobilized labels on HMM and subfragment-1 and a peak attributable to weakly immobilized labels bound to peptides. The rate at which spin-labeled peptides are released on tryptic digestion can be measured on the unfractionated digest by the decrease in the ESR peak corresponding to HMM and subfragment-1. The appearance of peptides containing spin-labeled S₁ groups parallels the loss of ATPase activity. No evidence has been found for the existence of an enzymatically active subfragment-1 lacking S₁ thiol groups.     

Interaction of tropomyosin with F-actin-heavy meromyosin complex

The effect of phosphorylated and dephosphorylated heavy meromyosins (HMMs) saturated with Ca2+ or Mg2+ on the binding of tropomyosin to F-actin and on the conformational changes of tropomyosin on actin was investigated. The experimental data were analysed on the basis of th emodel of cooperative binding of tropomyosin to F-actin with overlapping binding sites. In general, attachment of both HMMs to F-actin increased around 100-fold the tropomyosin-binding affinity but concomittantly reduced the cooperatively of binding. In the presence of Ca2+ and in the absence of ATP the binding of tropomyosin to F-actin in a "doubly contiguous" manner was three-fold stronger for F-actin saturated with dephosphorylated HMM as compared to phosphorylated HMM. Under the same rigor conditions but in the absence of Ca2+ the reverse was true but the difference was about 1.5-fold. The binding stoichiometry of tropomyosin to actin was 7:1 in the presence of dephosphorylated HMM saturated with Ca2+ or phosphorylated-saturated with Mg2+ and tended to be about 6:1 for both after the exchange of the cation bound to myosin heads. Bound HMM was also found to influence the fluorescence polarization of 1,5-IAEDANS-labelled tropomyosin complexed with F-actin in muscle ghost fibres. In the presence of Ca2+, the amount of randomly arranged tropomyosin fluorophores decreased when dephosphorylated HMM was bound to ghost fibres, in contrast to an observed increase in the case of bound phosphorylated HMM. Thus HMM induced conformational changes of tropomyosin in the actin-tropomyosin complex that was reflected in an alteration of the geometrical arrangement between tropomyosin and actin.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Transient electrical birefringence characterization of heavy meromyosin

Heavy meromyosin (HMM) and myosin subfragment 1 (S1) were prepared from myosin by using low concentrations of alpha-chymotrypsin. The light chain distribution in HMM was identical with that of myosin, within experimental error, when analyzed on 12% polyacrylamide gels after electrophoresis. Specific birefringences and birefringence decay times were measured by transient electrical birefringence in 5 mM KCl, 5 mM tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (pH 7), and 1 mM MgCl2 at 4 degrees C under gentle conditions that reduced the CaATPase activity by less than 10%. For solutions of HMM, by use of electric field pulses shorter than 0.5 microseconds, the birefringence decay signal from the S1 portions of HMM could be resolved and the rotational motions of the S1 moieties observed directly. The rotation relaxation time, adjusted to 20 degrees C, was 0.34 microseconds; this is in quantitative agreement with previous hydrodynamic results obtained by using covalently attached probes. The assignment of the fast decay time obtained with HMM to the S1 portions was confirmed by birefringence decay measurements on free S1, for which the relaxation time was 0.13 microseconds, corrected to 20 degrees C. The specific birefringences for S1 and HMM, respectively, were 0.37 X 10(-6) and 12.8 X 10(-6) (cm/statvolt)2. Thus, for much longer electric field pulses, the signal from HMM is due almost entirely to its subfragment 2 (S2) portion, and its rotational dynamics can also be monitored directly by using electrical birefringence. The decay of the signal from the S2 portion could be adequately fit without evoking bending of the S2 portion of HMM other than at its junction with S1.     

Heavy meromyosin decoration of filaments fromEscherichia coli

A fibrous protein complex extracted fromEscherichia coli B/r by the method of Minkoff and Damadian [2] demonstrates arrowhead complexes when reacted with heavy meromyosin.     

Dynamic affinity chromatography of heavy meromyosin subfragment-1

Heavy meromyosin subfragment-1 and its trinitrophenylated derivative 3ave been chromatographed on immobilized ATP, ADP and adenosine 5′-(β,γ-imino)triphosphate affinity chromatography columns, in the presence and in the absence of Mg²⁺ or Ca²⁺. Splitting of bound ATP was followed by using [γ-^{3 2}P]ATP columns. While the divalent cations had little effect on the chromatographic pattern in the case of the non-hydrolyzable ADP and adenosine 5′(β,γ-imino)triphosphate, they catalyzed splitting in the case of ATP and at the same time strongly increased the affinity of adsorption of the proteins. The protein-elution and the P_i-release patterns were different for the native and the modified proteins. These results have been interpreted in terms of protein binding to the various intermediates of the ATP hydrolysis reaction.     

Cross-linking of actin filaments by heavy meromyosin.

The structure of acto-heavy meromyosin has been examined by electron microscopy. When heavy meromyosin is mixed with actin at ~ 2 mg/ml a gel is formed. At lower actin concentrations more ordered assemblies are formed in which the actin filaments are in “rafts” about 300 Å apart cross-linked by heavy meromyosin. These results indicate that in solution the two heads of a heavy meromyosin molecule can bind to different actin filaments.