Cell cycle-regulated promoters in budding yeast

Cell cycle-regulated promoters are activated in response to specific cues in the cell cycle. By studying the mechanism of their transient activation, we may identify the molecules that trigger progress through the cell cycle.     

Cell cycle-regulated proteolysis of mitotic target proteins

The ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis of mitotic cyclin B, which is catalyzed by the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) and ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme H10 (UbcH10), begins around the time of the metaphase-anaphase transition and continues through G1 phase of the next cell cycle. We have used cell-free systems from mammalian somatic cells collected at different cell cycle stages (G0, G1, S, G2, and M) to investigate the regulated degradation of four targets of the mitotic destruction machinery: cyclins A and B, geminin H (an inhibitor of S phase identified in Xenopus), and Cut2p (an inhibitor of anaphase onset identified in fission yeast). All four are degraded by G1 extracts but not by extracts of S phase cells. Maintenance of destruction during G1 requires the activity of a PP2A-like phosphatase. Destruction of each target is dependent on the presence of an N-terminal destruction box motif, is accelerated by additional wild-type UbcH10 and is blocked by dominant negative UbcH10. Destruction of each is terminated by a dominant activity that appears in nuclei near the start of S phase. Previous work indicates that the APC/C-dependent destruction of anaphase inhibitors is activated after chromosome alignment at the metaphase plate. In support of this, we show that addition of dominant negative UbcH10 to G1 extracts blocks destruction of the yeast anaphase inhibitor Cut2p in vitro, and injection of dominant negative UbcH10 blocks anaphase onset in vivo. Finally, we report that injection of dominant negative Ubc3/Cdc34, whose role in G1-S control is well established and has been implicated in kinetochore function during mitosis in yeast, dramatically interferes with congression of chromosomes to the metaphase plate. These results demonstrate that the regulated ubiquitination and destruction of critical mitotic proteins is highly conserved from yeast to humans.     

Hydrogen peroxide-induced gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana

Hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)) is generated in plants after exposure to a variety of biotic and abiotic stresses, and has been shown to induce a number of cellular responses. Previously, we showed that H(2)O(2) generated during plant-elicitor interactions acts as a signaling molecule to induce the expression of defense genes and initiate programmed cell death in Arabidopsis thaliana suspension cultures. Here, we report for the first time the identification by RNA differential display of four genes whose expression is induced by H(2)O(2). These include genes that have sequence homology to previously identified Arabidopsis genes encoding a late embryogenesis-abundant protein, a DNA-damage repair protein, and a serine/threonine kinase. Their putative roles in H(2)O(2)-induced defense responses are discussed.     

Cell cycle-regulated, microtubule-independent organelle division in Cyanidioschyzon merolae

Mitochondrial and chloroplast division controls the number and morphology of organelles, but how cells regulate organelle division remains to be clarified. Here, we show that each step of mitochondrial and chloroplast division is closely associated with the cell cycle in Cyanidioschyzon merolae. Electron microscopy revealed direct associations between the spindle pole bodies and mitochondria, suggesting that mitochondrial distribution is physically coupled with mitosis. Interconnected organelles were fractionated under microtubule-stabilizing condition. Immunoblotting analysis revealed that the protein levels required for organelle division increased before microtubule changes upon cell division, indicating that regulation of protein expression for organelle division is distinct from that of cytokinesis. At the mitochondrial division site, dynamin stuck to one of the divided mitochondria and was spatially associated with the tip of a microtubule stretching from the other one. Inhibition of microtubule organization, proteasome activity or DNA synthesis, respectively, induced arrested cells with divided but shrunk mitochondria, with divided and segregated mitochondria, or with incomplete mitochondrial division restrained at the final severance, and repetitive chloroplast division. The results indicated that mitochondrial morphology and segregation but not division depend on microtubules and implied that the division processes of the two organelles are regulated at distinct checkpoints.     

Cell cycle-regulated centers of DNA double-strand break repair

In eukaryotes, homologous recombination is an important pathway for the repair of DNA double-strand breaks. We have studied this process in living cells in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae using Rad52 as a cell biological marker. In response to DNA damage, Rad52 redistributes itself and forms foci specifically during S phase. We have shown previously that Rad52 foci are centers of DNA repair where multiple DNA double-strand breaks colocalize. Here we report a correlation between the timing of Rad52 focus formation and modification of the Rad52 protein. In addition, we show that the two ends of a double-strand break are held tightly together in the majority of cells. Interestingly, in a small but significant fraction of the S phase cells, the two ends of a break separate suggesting that mechanisms exist to reassociate and align these ends for proper DNA repair.     

CLE polypeptide signaling gene expression in Arabidopsis embryos

The CLAVATA3 (CLV3)/ESR-related (CLE) family of small polypeptides mediate intercellular signaling events in plants. The biological roles of several CLE family members have been characterized, but the function of the majority still remains elusive. We recently performed a systematic expression analysis of 23 Arabidopsis CLE genes to gain insight into the developmental processes they may potentially regulate during vegetative and reproductive growth. Our study revealed that each Arabidopsis tissue expresses one or more CLE genes, suggesting that they might play roles in many developmental and/or physiological processes. Here we determined the expression patterns of nine Arabidopsis CLE gene promoters in mature embryos and compared them to the known expression patterns in seedlings. We found that more than half of these CLE genes have similar expression profiles at the embryo and seedling stages, whereas the rest differ dramatically. The implications of these findings in understanding the biological processes controlled by these CLE genes are discussed.Key words: arabidopsis, CLE, embryo, polypeptide, signalingThe CLE genes encode small, secreted polypeptides characterized by a highly conserved 14 amino-acid region at their carboxyl termini called the CLE domain.¹ To date 32 family members have been identified in Arabidopsis, yet only three have been assigned functions: CLV3, CLE40 and CLE41 have been implicated in stem cell homeostasis in shoot, root and vascular meristems, respectively.^2–5 Overexpression studies indicated that CLE genes may regulate additional biological processes as diverse as root and shoot growth, phyllotaxis, apical dominance and leaf shape and size control.^6,7 This hypothesis is consistent with our recent expression analysis of Arabidopsis A-type CLE genes,⁸ in which we found that all examined tissues expressed one or more CLE genes, in overlapping patterns. Each CLE promoter exhibited a highly distinct and specific activity profile, and many showed complex expression dynamics during vegetative and reproductive growth.Consistent with their roles in meristem maintenance, CLV3 and CLE40 are expressed early in embryogenesis when meristem initiation and organization take place.^3,5 Yet there are no other reports of CLE gene expression in Arabidopsis embryos, and therefore it is not known to what extent this family of small peptides regulates intercellular signaling events during embryogenesis. We addressed this question by analyzing the expression patterns of selected CLE promoters in mature embryos and compared them with those in 11-day-old seedlings. We chose nine CLE genes whose promoters are active in different tissues of the seedling.⁸ Transgenic dried seeds carrying a single CLE promoter sequence driving the expression of the uidA reporter gene were imbibed in water for four days, the embryos dissected out of their seed coats, and beta-glucuronidase (GUS) reporter assays performed.⁹ Stained embryos were cleared with chloral hydrate¹⁰ and visualized using a Zeiss Axiophot microscope.Five of the CLE genes analyzed showed similar promoter expression patterns in mature embryos and in seedlings. In embryos, the CLE11, 13, 16 and 17 promoters drove GUS activity in specific patterns in the root. CLE11 and CLE13 promoter activity was detected in the root cap and root apical meristem (Fig. 1A and B), CLE16 promoter activity was observed in the root cap and above the root apical meristem (Fig. 1C), and CLE17 promoter activity was seen weakly in the root apical meristem (Fig. 1D). Each of these CLE genes exhibited a similar expression pattern in seedling roots.⁸ CLE17 was additionally expressed in the embryo shoot apex and at the cotyledon margins (Fig. 1D). Similarly, in seedlings CLE17 was expressed in the vegetative shoot apex, and at the margins of the cotyledons and fully expanded leaves.⁸ In embryos, CLE27 promoter activity was strong in the hypocotyl, as well as in the medial region of the cotyledons along the main vein (Fig. 1E). In seedlings, CLE27 was strongly expressed in the hypocotyl and exhibited patchy expression in both cotyledons and leaves.⁸ Our analysis reveals that the expression of these CLE genes is established early during development and remains constant at later stages, suggesting that they may perform the same function throughout the Arabidopsis life cycle.Open in a separate windowFigure 1GUS reporter activity driven by the promoters of (A) CLE11, (B) CLE13, (C) CLE16, (D) CLE17, (E) CLE27, (F) CLE1, (G) CLE12, (H) CLE18 and (I) CLE25 in mature Arabidopsis embryos. Arrowhead indicates GUS activity in the root cap and the arrow indicates GUS activity in the root apical meristem. Scale bar, 100 µm.Remarkably, the other four CLE promoters drove embryo expression patterns that were strongly divergent from what was observed in seedlings. We found that the CLE1 promoter was active in the embryo throughout the hypocotyl and in the central region of the cotyledons (Fig. 1F), but was observed in seedlings solely in the vasculature of fully differentiated roots and at the root tips.⁸ CLE12 promoter activity in embryos was observed throughout the hypocotyl and the cotyledons (Fig. 1G), whereas in seedlings it was detected weakly in the leaf vasculature and more strongly in the root vasculature.⁸ In contrast, the CLE18 and CLE25 promoters did not drive reporter activity in mature embryos (Fig. 1H and I), despite being broadly and strongly expressed in seedlings.⁸These four CLE gene promoters show dynamic shifts in their activity between different developmental stages. From our data we infer that CLE1 activity in hypocotyls and cotyledons is required solely during embryogenesis, and that the gene then acquires a distinct function in post-embryonic root development. Similarly CLE12 appears to acquire a post-embryonic function in the root vasculature, and its broad activity in the embryonic leaves becomes restricted to the leaf vasculature following germination. Finally, the absence of CLE18 and CLE25 promoter activity in mature embryos suggests that they may be dispensable for embryo formation, and might either specifically regulate post-embryonic signaling events in certain tissues or be involved in mediating responses to environmental stimuli to which embryos are not subjected. Alternatively, they may be expressed earlier during embryogenesis and become repressed during seed dormancy.Our spatio-temporal expression analysis of a small group of CLE genes in mature embryos and seedlings indicates that the majority of these signaling molecules exert their roles beginning early in development, potentially contributing to tissue patterning and organization. Yet whereas some appear to contribute to the same biological processes throughout the plant life cycle, others seem to function in different tissues at different developmental stages. In addition, each CLE promoter studied here is active in vegetative and/or reproductive tissues that are not present in embryos, such as trichomes (CLE16 and CLE17) and style (CLE1).⁸ This observation suggests that CLE genes are widely recruited to new tissue-specific signaling functions during the course of plant development.     

Sterols regulate development and gene expression in Arabidopsis

Sterols are important not only for structural components of eukaryotic cell membranes but also for biosynthetic precursors of steroid hormones. In plants, the diverse functions of sterol-derived brassinosteroids (BRs) in growth and development have been investigated rigorously, yet little is known about the regulatory roles of other phytosterols. Recent analysis of Arabidopsis fackel (fk) mutants and cloning of the FK gene that encodes a sterol C-14 reductase have indicated that sterols play a crucial role in plant cell division, embryogenesis, and development. Nevertheless, the molecular mechanism underlying the regulatory role of sterols in plant development has not been revealed. In this report, we demonstrate that both sterols and BR are active regulators of plant development and gene expression. Similar to BR, both typical (sitosterol and stigmasterol) and atypical (8, 14-diene sterols accumulated in fk mutants) sterols affect the expression of genes involved in cell expansion and cell division. The regulatory function of sterols in plant development is further supported by a phenocopy of the fk mutant using a sterol C-14 reductase inhibitor, fenpropimorph. Although fenpropimorph impairs cell expansion and affects gene expression in a dose-dependent manner, neither effect can be corrected by applying exogenous BR. These results provide strong evidence that sterols are essential for normal plant growth and development and that there is likely a BR-independent sterol response pathway in plants. On the basis of the expression of endogenous FK and a reporter gene FK::beta-glucuronidase, we have found that FK is up-regulated by several growth-promoting hormones including brassinolide and auxin, implicating a possible hormone crosstalk between sterol and other hormone-signaling pathways.