Resistance of bacterial protein synthesis to double-stranded RNA

Double-stranded RNA fails to inhibit the formation of translation initiation complexes on R17 bacteriophage RNA, overall synthesis of R17 proteins, or the ability of bacterial initiation factor IF-3 to prevent the association of 30S and 50S ribosomal subunits into single ribosomes. Yet, IF-3 can form complexes with double-stranded RNA. However, IF-3 binds to double-stranded RNA with lower apparent affinity than to either R17 RNA or 30S ribosomal subunits; this may explain the resistance of bacterial protein synthesis to double-stranded RNA.     

Requirement of chain initiation factor 3 and ribosomal protein S1 in translation of synthetic and natural messenger RNA.

Amino acid incorporation directed by poly(A), poly(U) or R17 RNA has been examined in S1-depleted protein synthesizing systems. We observe that the translation of either synthetic or natural messenger RNA is strictly dependent on the presence of chain initiation factor 3 and ribosomal protein S1. With poly(A) or poly(U) both IF-3 and S1 stimulate amino acid incorporation at least 25-fold, and with R17 RNA the stimulation is approximately 15-fold. More than one copy of S1 per ribosome decreases amino acid incorporation directed by poly(U) or R17 RNA. Initiation complex formation with R17 RNA is also stimulated optimally by the addition of one copy of S1 per ribosome. The function of IF-3 and S1 in protein synthesis is considered.     

Involvement of ribosomal protein S1 in the assembly of the initiation complex.

Antibodies against ribosomal protein S1 (anti-S1) have been used to determine the function of S1 in the partial reactions involved in the translation of MS2 RNA in vitro. Vacant ribosomes are fully sensitive to the antibodies, whereas elongating ribosomes are resistant. We have determined at which stage of translation the resistance to anti-S1 is acquired. We find that insensitivity to anti-S1 already arises upon mixing 30-S subunits with MS2 RNA. Apparently the two particles form a complex in which S1 is functionally protected against its antibody. Complex formation depends on elevated temperature, a suitable ionic environment and it is stimulated by the initiation factor IF-3. It does not depend on IF-1, IF-2 or fMet-tRNA. Thus ribosomes have the potential to recognize the messenger in the absence of fMet-tRNA. Protein S1 appears directly involved in this primary recognition reaction.     

Antisense oligonucleotide inhibition of encephalomyocarditis virus RNA translation

We report the inhibition of encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV) RNA translation in cell-free rabbit reticulocyte lysates by antisense oligonucleotides (13-17-base oligomers) complementary to (a) the viral 5' non-translated region, (b) the AUG start codon and (c) the coding sequence. Our results demonstrate that the extent of translation inhibition is dependent on the region where the complementary oligonucleotides bind. Non-complementary and 3'-non-translated-region-specific oligonucleotides had no effect on translation. A significant degree of translation inhibition was obtained with oligonucleotides complementary to the viral 5' non-translated region and AUG initiation codon. Digestion of the oligonucleotide:RNA hybrid by RNase H did not significantly increase translation inhibition in the case of 5'-non-translated-region-specific and initiator-AUG-specific oligonucleotides; in contrast, RNase H digestion was necessary for inhibition by the coding-region-specific oligonucleotide. We propose that (a) 5'-non-translated-region-specific oligonucleotides inhibit translation by affecting the 40S ribosome binding and/or passage to the AUG start codon, (b) AUG-specific oligonucleotides inhibit translation initiation by inhibiting the formation of an active 80S ribosome and (c) the coding-region-specific oligonucleotide does not prevent protein synthesis because the translating 80S ribosome can dislodge the oligonucleotide from the EMCV RNA template.     

Initiation factor IF-3 and the binary complex between initiation factor IF-2 and formylmethionyl-tRNA are mutually exclusive on the 30-S ribosomal subunit.

The formation of 30-S initiation complexes depends strongly on initiation factor IF-3; at molar ratios of IF-3 to 30-S ribosomes up to one a stimulation is observed, whereas at ratios higher than one, initiation complex formation declines strongly. The target of the observed inhibition of fMet-tRNA binding at high concentrations of IF-3 is the 30-S initiation complex itself. On the one hand addition of IF-3 to preformed 30-S initiation complexes leads to a release of bound fMet-tRNA which is linear with the amount of factor added, whereas no effect on isolated 70-S initiation complexes is seen. The release of fMet-tRNA from preformed 30-S initiation complexes is accompanied by a release of IF-2 in a one-to-one molar ratio which is in agreement with our previous findings showing that binding of fMet-tRNA takes place via a binary complex: IF-2 . fMet-tRNA (Eur. J. Biochem. 66, 181--192 and 77, 69--75). On the other hand increasing amounts of both IF-2 and fMet-tRNA relieve the IF-3-induced inhibition of 30-S initiation complex formation. From these findings it is concluded that IF-3 and the IF-2 . fMet-tRNA complex are mutually exclusive on the 30-S ribosome. This implies that under our experimental conditions MS2 RNA binding precedes fMet-tRNA binding if one accepts that the presence of IF-3 on the 30-S subunit is obligatory for messenger binding.     

Alu RNA regulates the cellular pool of active ribosomes by targeted delivery of SRP9/14 to 40S subunits

The human genome contains about 1.5 million Alu elements, which are transcribed into Alu RNAs by RNA polymerase III. Their expression is upregulated following stress and viral infection, and they associate with the SRP9/14 protein dimer in the cytoplasm forming Alu RNPs. Using cell-free translation, we have previously shown that Alu RNPs inhibit polysome formation. Here, we describe the mechanism of Alu RNP-mediated inhibition of translation initiation and demonstrate its effect on translation of cellular and viral RNAs. Both cap-dependent and IRES-mediated initiation is inhibited. Inhibition involves direct binding of SRP9/14 to 40S ribosomal subunits and requires Alu RNA as an assembly factor but its continuous association with 40S subunits is not required for inhibition. Binding of SRP9/14 to 40S prevents 48S complex formation by interfering with the recruitment of mRNA to 40S subunits. In cells, overexpression of Alu RNA decreases translation of reporter mRNAs and this effect is alleviated with a mutation that reduces its affinity for SRP9/14. Alu RNPs also inhibit the translation of cellular mRNAs resuming translation after stress and of viral mRNAs suggesting a role of Alu RNPs in adapting the translational output in response to stress and viral infection.     

Affinity modification of Escherichia coli ribosomes with 2',3'-O-[4-(N-2-chloroethyl)-N-methylamino]-benzylidene derivative of AUGU3 in the 70S initiation complexes

Affinity labelling of the Escherichia coli ribosomes with the 2',3'-O-[4-(N-(2-chloroethyl)-N-methylamino]benzylidene derivative of AUGU3(AUGU3[14C]CHRCl) has been studied within 70S initiation complexes ribosome.AUGU3[14C]CHRCl.fMet-tRNA(Metf) and binary complex ribosome.AUGU3[14C]CHRCl. Various ways of the 70S initiation complex formation resulted in differently labelled products. Proteins S5, S7, S9, L1, L16 were thus identified as cross-linked with AUGU3[14C]CHRCl within an initiation complex obtained in the presence of initiation factors IF-1, IF-2, IF-3, whereas only proteins S5 and S7 were cross-linked within the complex obtained with the sole factor IF-2. Proteins S1, S3, L1 and L33 were labelled within the initiation complex obtained nonenzymatically but only protein S1 within the binary complex. In all complexes formed with use of initiation factors labelling of IF-2 factor was invariably observed.     

Function of initiation factor 1 in the binding and release of initiation factor 2 from ribosomal initiation complexes in Escherichia coli.

1. Studies on the function of initiation factor 1 (IF-1) in the formation of 30 S initiation complexes have been carried out. IF-1 appears to prevent the dissociation of initiation factor 2 (IF-2) from the 30 S initiation complex. The factor has no effect on either the initial binding of IF-2 nor does it increase the amount of IF-2 dependent fMet-tRNA and GTP bound to the 30 S subunit. Bound fMet-tRNA remains stable to sucrose gradient centrifugation even in the absence of IF-1. 2. It is postulated that the presence of IF-2 on the 30 S complex is necessary so that at the time of junction with the 50 S subunit to form a 70 S complex, the 70 S-dependent GTPase activity of IF-2 can hydrolyze GTP. This hydrolysis provides a means by which GTP can be removed to facilitate formation of a 70 S initiation complex active in peptidyl transfer. In support of this postulate, it was observed that 30 S initiation complexes formed in the absence of IF-1 could be depleted of their complexes were still able to accept 50 S subunits to form 70 S complexes which could still donate fMet-tRNA into peptide linkages. These results indicate that 30 S complexes lacking GTP do not require IF-2 for formation of active 70 S complexes. 3. IF-1, which is required to prevent dissociation of IF-2 from the 30 S initiation complex, is also required for release of IF-2 from ribosomes following 70 S initiation complex formation. The mechanisms of the release of IF-2 has been studied in greater detail. Evidence is presented which rules out the presence of a stable IF-2 GDP complex on the surface of the 70 S ribosome following GTP hydrolysis and of any exchange reactions between IF-1 and guanine nucleotides necessary for effecting the release of IF-2. IF-2 remains on the 70 S initiation complexes after release of guanine nucleotides and can be liberated solely by addition of IF-1.     

Initiation factor 3 requirement for the formation of initiation complexes with synthetic oligonucleotides

Initiation factor IF-3 is required for the poly (U)-directed binding of N-acetyl-Phe-tRNA to 70S ribosomes as well as for the binding of fMet-tRNA directed by poly (U,G), AUG, and bacteriophage f₂ RNA. The formation of the 70S initiation complex is dependent upon IF-2 and is stimulated by IF-1. The requirement for IF-3 is not alleviated by high concentrations of the synthetic templates.     

Effect of T4 infection on initiation of protein synthesis and messenger specificity of initiation factor 3

No alteration in the messenger specificity of initiation factor 3 (IF-3) is observed upon T4 phage infection of several strains of Escherichia coli. IF-3 present in the 1.0 m NH₄Cl washes of ribosomes from T4-infected cells supports the translation of f2 RNA and T4 late mRNA with the same degree of efficiency as the IF-3 in the ribosomal washes obtained from uninfected cells. At high concentrations the ribosomal washes obtained from T4-infected cells are more inhibitory for both f2 RNA- and T4 late mRNA-directed protein synthesis than the ribosomal washes from uninfected cells. Furthermore, this increased inhibition is also observed in the poly(U)-directed synthesis of polyphenylalanine. These data suggest that translational controls exerted at the level of IF-3 probably do not account for the alterations in protein synthesis observed upon T4 infection.     

Turnip mosaic virus VPg interacts with Arabidopsis thaliana eIF(iso)4E and inhibits in vitro translation

The interaction between turnip mosaic virus (TuMV) viral protein linked to the genome (VPg) and Arabidopsis thaliana eukaryotic initiation factor (iso)4E (eIF(iso)4E) was investigated to address the influence of potyviral VPg on host cellular translational initiation. Affinity chromatographic analysis showed that the region comprising amino acids 62-70 of VPg is important for the interaction with eIF(iso)4E. In vitro translation analysis showed that the addition of VPg significantly inhibited translation of capped RNA in eIF(iso)4E-reconstituted wheat germ extract. This result indicates that VPg inhibits cap-dependent translational initiation via binding to eIF(iso)4E. The inhibition by VPg of in vitro translation of RNA with wheat germ extract did not depend on RNase activity. Our present results may indicate that excess VPg produced at the encapsidation stage shuts off cap-dependent translational initiation in host cells by inhibiting complex formation between eIF(iso)4E and cellular mRNAs.     

Translational initiation factors IF-1 and eIF-2 alpha share an RNA-binding motif with prokaryotic ribosomal protein S1 and polynucleotide phosphorylase.

Initiation of translation is a complicated process involving numerous accessory factors whose functions remain incompletely understood. Bacterial ribosomal protein S1 is known to contain a repeated sequence motif (S1-RM), also found in polynucleotide phosphorylase, that is thought to be involved in binding to RNA. Using the technique of profile analysis, the S1-RM can also be found in bacterial and chloroplast translation initiation factor IF-1 sequences, and in the sequences of eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF-2 alpha chains. The significance of the similarity of the sequences is very high suggesting that the occurrence of the S1-RM in these diverse proteins represents homology. The similarity of S1 to IF-1 further suggests that S1 has evolved from an IF-1 like ancestor, and therefore that the two proteins have a similar or competitive function. The most obvious common function of the proteins containing the S1-RM seems to be RNA binding, suggesting that IF-1 and eIF-2 alpha may bind to RNA.     

Interaction of a fluorescent streptomycin derivative with Escherichia coli ribosomes.

The high salt wash of rabbit reticulocyte ribosomes contains two separate factors which can partially reverse the inhibition of polypeptide chain initiation that results when reticulocyte lysate is incubated in the absence of hemin. These two factors, termed initiation factor (IF) 1 and IF-2, have been separated from each other by chromatography on diethylaminoethyl cellulose and then further purified on hydroxyapatite. IF-1 forms a GTP-dependent complex with methionyl-tRNA_f that is retained on Millipore filters. When these factors are added to a system containing reconstituted, salt-extracted ribosomes, IF-1 promotes the binding of methionyl-tRNA_f to the 40 S subunit, whereas IF-2 promotes the formation of 80 S initiation complexes from 40 S complexes. Addition of small amounts of one factor and a saturating level of the other to the unfractionated lysate and incubation in the absence of hemin produce an additive stimulation of protein synthesis. Each factor can also partially reverse the inhibitory effect of the hemin-controlled translational repressor. The implication of these findings for the mechanism of hemin control of protein synthesis in reticulocyte lysates is discussed.     

Participation of initiation factor IF-3 in the binding of AcPhe-tRNA to the 30S ribosomal subunit

Initiation factor IF-3 is required in addition to IF-1 and IF-2 for maximal initial rate of poly(U)-directed binding of AcPhe-tRNA to 30S ribosomal subunits of $\text{E. coli}$. Incubation periods longer than 10 sec, by which time the reaction is virtually over, progressively obscure the requirement for IF-3 in AcPhe-tRNA binding. IF-3 also stimulates the poly(A, G, U)-directed binding of fMet-tRNA to the 30S ribosomal subunit, but in this case, significant stimulation can still be observed even with extended incubation. These results indicate that IF-3 functions similarly in the translation of synthetic mRNA, as it does with natural mRNA, participating in ribosome dissociation and in the formation of the initiation complex from the 30S ribosomal subunit.     

Viral stress-inducible protein p56 inhibits translation by blocking the interaction of eIF3 with the ternary complex eIF2.GTP.Met-tRNAi

Viral stress-inducible protein p56 is produced in response to viral stress-inducing agents such as double-stranded RNA and interferon, as well as other poorly understood mechanisms of viral infection. It has been shown previously that p56 is able to bind the eukaryotic initiation factor 3e(eIF3e) (p48/Int-6) subunit of the eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF3 and function as an inhibitor of translation in vitro and in vivo. The exact mechanism by which p56 is able to interfere with protein synthesis is not understood. Based on the known roles of eIF3 in the initiation pathway, we employed assays designed to individually look at specific functions of eIF3 and the effect of p56 on these eIF3-mediated functions. These assays examined the effect of p56 on ribosome dissociation, the eIF3.eIF4F interaction, and enhancement of the ternary complex eIF2.GTP.Met-tRNAi formation. Here we report that p56 is able to inhibit translation initiation specifically at the level of eIF3.ternary complex formation. The effect of p56-mediated inhibition was also examined in two different contexts, cap-mediated and encephalomyocarditis virus internal ribosomal entry site-mediated translation. Whereas cap-dependent initiation was severely inhibited by p56, internal ribosomal entry site-mediated translation appeared to be insensitive to p56.     

The DEAD-box helicase DDX3 substitutes for the cap-binding protein eIF4E to promote compartmentalized translation initiation of the HIV-1 genomic RNA

Here, we show a novel molecular mechanism promoted by the DEAD-box RNA helicase DDX3 for translation of the HIV-1 genomic RNA. This occurs through the adenosine triphosphate-dependent formation of a translation initiation complex that is assembled at the 5′ m⁷GTP cap of the HIV-1 mRNA. This is due to the property of DDX3 to substitute for the initiation factor eIF4E in the binding of the HIV-1 m⁷GTP 5′ cap structure where it nucleates the formation of a core DDX3/PABP/eIF4G trimeric complex on the HIV-1 genomic RNA. By using RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization coupled to indirect immunofluorescence, we further show that this viral ribonucleoprotein complex is addressed to compartmentalized cytoplasmic foci where the translation initiation complex is assembled.     

Initial rate kinetic analysis of the mechanism of initiation complex formation and the role of initiation factor IF-3.

Initial rate kinetics of the formation of ternary complexes of Escherichia coli 30S ribosomal subunits, poly(uridylic acid), and N-acetylphenylalanyl transfer ribonucleic acid in the presence and in the absence of IF-3 are consistent with the hypothesis that the ternary complex is formed through a random order of addition of polynucleotide and aminoacyl-tRNA to separate and independent binding sites on the 30S ribosomes. The transformation of an intermediate into a stable ternary complex which probably entails a rearrangement of the ribosome structure leading to a codon-anticodon interaction represents the rate-limiting step in the formation of the ternary complex. The rate constant of this transformation, as well as the association constants for the formation of the 30S-poly(U) and 30S-N-AcPhe-tRNA binary complexes, are enhanced by the presence of IF-3 which acts as a kinetic effector on reactions which are intrinsic properties of the 30S ribosome. The IF-3-induced modification of these kinetic parameters of the 30S ribosomal subunit can per se explain the effect of IF-3 on protein synthesis without invoking a specific action at the level of the mRNA-ribosome interaction. This seems to be confirmed by the finding that IF-3 can stimulate several-fold the formation of a ternary complex even if one by-passes the ribosome-template binding step by starting with a covalent 30S-polynucleotide binary complex. Furthermore, the above-mentioned changes induced by IF-3 appear to be compatible with the previously proposed idea that the binding of the factor modifies the conformation of the 30S subunit. The random order of addition of substrates determined for the 30S-N-AcPhe-tRNA-poly(U) model system was found to be valid also for the more physiological 30S initiation complex containing poly(A,U.G) and (fMet-tRNA formed at low Mg2+ concentration in the presence of GTP and all three initiation factors.     

Consequences of a specific cleavage in situ of 16-S ribosomal RNA for polypeptide chain initiation.

The effect of bacteriocin (cloacin DF13) treatment of Escherichia coli ribosomes on initiation of protein synthesis has been studied in detail. In agreement with our previous findings [Baan et al. (1976) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 73, 702--706] it is shown that 70-S initiation complexes can be formed with cloacin-treated ribosomes, but that the initiation factor IF-1 does not function properly. The following pleiotropic effects of this factor have been studied: (a) the acceleration of ribosomal subunit exchange with 70-S couples; (b) the stimulation of the IF-3-mediated dissociation of 70-S ribosomes; (c) the stimulation of 30-S initiation complex formation; (d) the enhancement of the rate of release of IF-2 from 70-S initiation complexes. The effects (a) and (b) are virtually abolished after cleavage of 16-S rRNA. The effect (d) is only partially reduced whereas effect (c) seems to be unimpaired. It is concluded that 70-S initiation complex formation with cloacin-treated ribosomes suffers from improper functioning of IF-1 in the generation of active subunits from 70-S tight couples. This is the only effect on initiation. It can be compensated for by adding more IF-3. The data provide functional evidence that 16-S rRNA is involved in ribosomal subunit interaction.     

Differential requirements for polypeptide chain initiation complex formation at the three bacteriophage R17 initiator regions.

The initiation specificity of washed E. coli ribosomes in the presence and absence of purified initiation factors and/or S1 protein has been examined in protection experiments using 32P-labelled R17 RNA. We find that the three bacteriophage initiator regions do not exhibit equal requirements for either of these components during initiation complex formation. Specifically, both factors and S1 stimulate ribosome binding to the beginnings of the coat and replicase cistrons to a greater extent than they promote recognition of the A protein initiation site. The differential effects are therefore inversely correlated with the degree of mRNA-16S rRNA complementarity exhibited by the three initiator regions. We also observe that S1 suppresses ribosome binding to spurious sites in the R17 RNA.