Localization of xeroderma pigmentosum group A protein and replication protein A on damaged DNA in nucleotide excision repair

The interaction of xeroderma pigmentosum group A protein (XPA) and replication protein A (RPA) with damaged DNA in nucleotide excision repair (NER) was studied using model dsDNA and bubble-DNA structure with 5-{3-[6-(carboxyamido-fluoresceinyl)amidocapromoyl]allyl}-dUMP lesions in one strand and containing photoreactive 5-iodo-dUMP residues in defined positions. Interactions of XPA and RPA with damaged and undamaged DNA strands were investigated by DNA–protein photocrosslinking and gel shift analysis. XPA showed two maximums of crosslinking intensities located on the 5′-side from a lesion. RPA mainly localized on undamaged strand of damaged DNA duplex and damaged bubble-DNA structure. These results presented for the first time the direct evidence for the localization of XPA in the 5′-side of the lesion and suggested the key role of XPA orientation in conjunction with RPA binding to undamaged strand for the positioning of the NER preincision complex. The findings supported the mechanism of loading of the heterodimer consisting of excision repair cross-complementing group 1 and xeroderma pigmentosum group F proteins by XPA on the 5′-side from the lesion before damaged strand incision. Importantly, the proper orientation of XPA and RPA in the stage of preincision was achieved in the absence of TFIIH and XPG.     

Strand-specific binding of RPA and XPA to damaged duplex DNA

The nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway is a major pathway used to repair bulky adduct DNA damage. Two proteins, xeroderma pigmentosum group A protein (XPA) and replication protein A (RPA), have been implicated in the role of DNA damage recognition in the NER pathway. The particular manner in which these two damage recognition proteins align themselves with respect to a damaged DNA site was assessed using photoreactive base analogues within specific DNA substrates to allow site-specific cross-linking of the damage recognition proteins. Results of these studies demonstrate that both RPA and XPA are in close proximity to the adduct as measured by cross-linking of each protein directly to the platinum moiety. Additional studies demonstrate that XPA contacts both the damaged and undamaged strands of the duplex DNA. Direct evidence is presented demonstrating preferential binding of RPA to the undamaged strand of a duplex damaged DNA molecule.     

Crosslinking of nucleotide excision repair proteins with DNA containing photoreactive damages

Photoreactive DNA duplexes mimicking substrates of nucleotide excision repair (NER) system were used to analyze the interaction of XPC-HR23B, RPA, and XPA with damaged DNA. Photoreactive groups in one strand of DNA duplex (arylazido-dCMP or 4-thio-dUMP) were combined with anthracenyl-dCMP residue at the opposite strand to analyze contacts of NER factors with damaged and undamaged strands. Crosslinking of XPC-HR23B complex with photoreactive 48-mers results in modification of XPC subunit. XPC-HR23B did not crosslink with DNA duplex bearing bulky residues in both strands while this modification does not prevent interaction of DNA with XPA. The data on crosslinking of XPA and RPA with photoreactive DNA duplexes containing bulky group in one of the strands are in favor of XPA preference to interact with the damaged strand and RPA preference for the undamaged strand. The results support the understanding and set the stage for dynamically oriented experiments of how the pre-incision complex is formed in the early stage of NER.     

Replication protein A interactions with DNA. III. Molecular basis of recognition of damaged DNA

Human replication protein A (RPA) is a heterotrimeric single-stranded DNA-binding protein (subunits of 70, 32, and 14 kDa) that is required for cellular DNA metabolism. RPA has been reported to interact specifically with damaged double-stranded DNA and to participate in multiple steps of nucleotide excision repair (NER) including the damage recognition step. We have examined the mechanism of RPA binding to both single-stranded and double-stranded DNA (ssDNA and dsDNA, respectively) containing damage. We show that the affinity of RPA for damaged dsDNA correlated with disruption of the double helix by the damaged bases and required RPAs ssDNA-binding activity. We conclude that RPA is recognizing single-stranded character caused by the damaged nucleotides. We also show that RPA binds specifically to damaged ssDNA. The specificity of binding varies with the type of damage with RPA having up to a 60-fold preference for a pyrimidine(6-4)pyrimidone photoproduct. We show that this specific binding was absolutely dependent on the zinc-finger domain in the C-terminus of the 70-kDa subunit. The affinity of RPA for damaged ssDNA was 5 orders of magnitude higher than that of the damage recognition protein XPA (xeroderma pigmentosum group A protein). These findings suggest that RPA probably binds to both damaged and undamaged strands in the NER excision complex. RPA binding may be important for efficient excision of damaged DNA in NER.     

Preferential binding of human full-length XPA and the minimal DNA binding domain (XPA-MF122) with the mitomycin C-DNA interstrand cross-link

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is an important cellular mechanism that removes radiation-induced and chemically induced damage from DNA. The XPA protein is involved in the damage recognition step of NER and appears to function by binding damaged DNA and recruiting other proteins to the site. It may also play a role in subsequent steps of NER through interaction with other repair proteins. Interstrand cross-links are of particular interest, since these lesions involve both strands of duplex DNA and present special challenges to the repair machinery. Using 14 and 25 bp duplex oligonucleotides containing a defined, well-characterized single mitomycin C (MMC)-DNA interstrand cross-link, we have shown through gel shift analysis that both XPA and a minimal DNA binding domain of XPA (XPA-MF122) preferentially bind to MMC-cross-linked DNA with a greater specificity and a higher affinity (>2-fold) than to the same undamaged DNA sequence. This preferential binding to MMC-cross-linked DNA occurs in the absence of other proteins from the NER complex. Differences in binding affinity and specificity were observed among the different protein-DNA combinations that were both protein and DNA specific. Defining XPA-MMC-DNA interactions may aid in elucidating the mechanism by which DNA cross-links and other forms of DNA damage are recognized and repaired by the NER machinery in eukaryotic cells.     

Binding of XPA and RPA to damaged DNA investigated by fluorescence anisotropy

The proteins XPA and RPA are assumed to be involved in primary damage recognition of global genome nucleotide excision repair. XPA as well as RPA have been each reported to specifically bind DNA lesions, and ternary complex formation with damaged DNA has also been shown. We employed fluorescence anisotropy measurements to study the DNA-binding properties of XPA and RPA under true equilibrium conditions using damaged DNA probes carrying a terminal fluorescein modification as a reporter. XPA binds with low affinity and in a strongly salt-dependent manner to DNA containing a 1,3-d(GTG) intrastrand adduct of the anticancer drug cisplatin or a 6-nt mismatch (K(D) = 400 nM) with 3-fold preference for damaged vs undamaged DNA. At near physiological salt conditions binding is very weak (K(D) > 2 microM). RPA binds to damaged DNA probes with dissociation constants in the range of 20 nM and a nearly 15-fold preference over undamaged DNA. The presence of a cisplatin modification weakens the affinity of RPA for single-stranded DNA by more than 1 order of magnitude indicating that binding to the lesion itself is not a driving force in damage recognition. Our fluorescence anisotropy assays also show that the presence of XPA does not enhance the affinity of RPA for damaged DNA although both proteins interact. In contrast, cooperative binding of XPA and RPA is observed in EMSA. Our results point to a damage-sensing function of the XPA-RPA complex with RPA mediating the important DNA contacts.     

Xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group A protein (XPA) modulates RPA-DNA interactions via enhanced complex stability and inhibition of strand separation activity

Replication protein A (RPA) participates in many cellular functions including DNA replication and nucleotide excision repair. A direct interaction between RPA and the xeroderma pigmentosum group A protein (XPA) facilitates the assembly of a preincision complex during the processing of DNA damage by the nucleotide excision repair pathway. We demonstrate here the formation of a ternary RPA, XPA, and duplex cisplatin-damaged DNA complex as is evident by electrophoretic supershift analysis. The RPA-XPA complex displays modest specificity for damaged versus undamaged duplex DNA, and the RPA-XPA complex displays a greater affinity for binding duplex cisplatin-damaged DNA when compared with the RPA or XPA proteins alone, consistent with previous results. Using DNA denaturation assays, we demonstrate that the role of XPA is in the stabilization of the duplex DNA structure via inhibition of the strand separation activity of RPA. Rapid kinetic analysis indicates that the bimolecular k(on) of the RPA-XPA complex is 2.5-fold faster than RPA alone for binding a duplex cisplatin-damaged DNA. The dissociation rate, k(off), of the RPA-XPA complex is slower than that of the RPA protein alone, suggesting that the XPA protein stabilizes the initial binding of RPA to duplex DNA as well as maintaining the integrity of the duplex DNA. Interestingly, XPA has no effect on the k(on) of RPA for a single-stranded 40-mer DNA.     

Interaction of nucleotide excision repair factors XPC-HR23B, XPA, and RPA with damaged DNA

The interaction of nucleotide excision repair factors--xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group C protein in complex with human homolog of yeast Rad23 protein (XPC-HR23B), replication protein A (RPA), and xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group A protein (XPA)--with 48-mer DNA duplexes imitating damaged DNA structures was investigated. All studied proteins demonstrated low specificity in binding to damaged DNA compared with undamaged DNA duplexes. RPA stimulates formation of XPC-HR23B complex with DNA, and when XPA and XPC-HR23B are simultaneously present in the reaction mixture a synergistic effect in binding of these proteins to DNA is observed. RPA crosslinks to DNA bearing photoreactive 5I-dUMP residue on one strand and fluorescein-substituted dUMP analog as a lesion in the opposite strand of DNA duplex and also stimulates cross-linking with XPC-HR23B. Therefore, RPA might be one of the main regulation factors at various stages of nucleotide excision repair. The data are in agreement with the cooperative binding model of nucleotide excision repair factors participating in pre-incision complex formation with DNA duplexes bearing damages.     

Effect of point substitutions within the minimal DNA-binding domain of xeroderma pigmentosum group a protein on interaction with DNA intermediates of nucleotide excision repair

Xeroderma pigmentosum factor A (XPA) is one of the key proteins in the nucleotide excision repair (NER) process. The effects of point substitutions in the DNA-binding domain of XPA (positively charged lysine residues replaced by negatively charged glutamate residues: XPA K204E, K179E, K141E, and tandem mutant K141E/K179E) on the inter-action of the protein with DNA structures modeling intermediates of the damage recognition and pre-incision stages in NER were analyzed. All these mutations decreased the affinity of the protein to DNA, the effect depending on the substitution and the DNA structure. The mutant as well as wild-type proteins bind with highest efficiency partly open damaged DNA duplex, and the affinity of the mutants to this DNA is reduced in the order: K204E > K179E ? K141E = K141/179E. For all the mutants, decrease in DNA binding efficiency was more pronounced in the case of full duplex and single-stranded DNA than with bubble-DNA structure, the difference between protein affinities to different DNA structures increasing as DNA binding activity of the mutant decreased. No effect of the studied XPA mutations on the location of the protein on the partially open DNA duplex was observed using photoinduced crosslinking with 5-I-dUMP in different positions of the damaged DNA strand. These results combined with earlier published data suggest no direct correlation between DNA binding and activity in NER for these XPA mutants.     

Preferential binding of human XPA to the mitomycin C-DNA interstrand crosslink and modulation by arsenic and cadmium

The Xeroderma Pigmentosum A (XPA) protein is involved in the DNA damage recognition and repair complex formation steps of nucleotide excision repair (NER), and has been shown to preferentially bind to various forms of DNA damage including bulky lesions. DNA interstrand crosslinks are of particular interest as a form of DNA damage, since these lesions involve both strands of duplex DNA and present special challenges to the repair machinery, and mitomycin C (MMC) is one of several useful cancer chemotherapy drugs that induce these lesions. Purified XPA and the minimal DNA-binding domain of XPA are both fully capable of preferentially binding to MMC-DNA interstrand crosslinks in the absence of other proteins from the NER complex. Circular dichroism (CD) and gel shift assays were used to investigate XPA-DNA binding and to assess changes in secondary structure induced as a consequence of the interaction of XPA with model MMC-crosslinked and unmodified DNAs. These studies revealed that while XPA demonstrates only a modest increase in affinity for adducted DNA, it adopts a different conformation when bound to MMC-damaged DNA than when bound to undamaged DNA. This change in conformation may be more important in recruiting other proteins into a competent NER complex at damaged sites than preferential binding per se. Arsenic had little effect on XPA binding even at toxic concentrations, whereas cadmium reduced XPA binding to DNA to 10-15% that of Zn-XPA, and zinc addition could only partially restore activity. In addition, there was little or no change in conformation when Cd-XPA bound MMC-crosslinked DNA even though it demonstrated preferential binding, which may contribute to the mechanism by which cadmium can act as a co-mutagen and co-carcinogen.     

Nucleotide excision repair by mutant xeroderma pigmentosum group A (XPA) proteins with deficiency in interaction with RPA

The xeroderma pigmentosum group A protein (XPA) is a core component of nucleotide excision repair (NER). To coordinate early stage NER, XPA interacts with various proteins, including replication protein A (RPA), ERCC1, DDB2, and TFIIH, in addition to UV-damaged or chemical carcinogen-damaged DNA. In this study, we investigated the effects of mutations in the RPA binding regions of XPA on XPA function in NER. XPA binds through an N-terminal region to the middle subunit (RPA32) of the RPA heterotrimer and through a central region that overlaps with its damaged DNA binding region to the RPA70 subunit. In cell-free NER assays, an N-terminal deletion mutant of XPA showed loss of binding to RPA32 and reduced DNA repair activity, but it could still bind to UV-damaged DNA and RPA. In contrast, amino acid substitutions in the central region reduced incisions at the damaged site in the cell-free NER assay, and four of these mutants (K141A, T142A, K167A, and K179A) showed reduced binding to RPA70 but normal binding to damaged DNA. Furthermore, mutants that had one of the four aforementioned substitutions and an N-terminal deletion exhibited lower DNA incision activity and binding to RPA than XPA with only one of these substitutions or the deletion. Taken together, these results indicate that XPA interaction with both RPA32 and RPA70 is indispensable for NER reactions.     

Interactions of mammalian proteins with cisplatin-damaged DNA

We have undertaken the systematic isolation and characterization of mammalian proteins which display an affinity for cisplatin-damaged DNA. Fractionation of human cell extracts has led to the identification of two classes of proteins. The first includes proteins that bind duplex DNA in the absence of cisplatin damage and retain their affinity for DNA in the presence of cisplatin-DNA adducts. The DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) falls into this class. The inhibition of DNA-PK phosphorylation activity by cisplatin-damaged DNA has led to the hypothesis that cisplatin sensitization of mammalian cells to ionizing radiation may be mediated by DNA-PK. The second class of proteins identified are those which display a high relative affinity for cisplatin-damaged DNA and a low affinity for undamaged duplex DNA. Proteins that fall into this class include high mobility group 1 protein (HMG-1), replication protein A (RPA) and xeroderma pigmentosum group A protein (XPA). Each protein has been isolated and purified in the lab. The interaction of each protein with cisplatin-damaged DNA has been assessed in electrophoretic mobility shift assays. A series of DNA binding experiments suggests that RPA binds duplex DNA via denaturation and subsequent preferential binding to the undamaged DNA strand of the partial duplex. DNA substrates prepared with photo-reactive base analogs on either the damaged or undamaged DNA strand have also been employed to investigate the mechanism and specific protein-DNA interactions that occur as each protein binds to cisplatin-damaged DNA. Results suggest both damage and strand specificity for RPA and XPA binding cisplatin-damaged DNA.     

An interaction between the DNA repair factor XPA and replication protein A appears essential for nucleotide excision repair.

Replication protein A (RPA) is required for simian virus 40-directed DNA replication in vitro and for nucleotide excision repair (NER). Here we report that RPA and the human repair protein XPA specifically interact both in vitro and in vivo. Mapping of the RPA-interactive domains in XPA revealed that both of the largest subunits of RPA, RPA-70 and RPA-34, interact with XPA at distinct sites. A domain involved in mediating the interaction with RPA-70 was located between XPA residues 153 and 176. Deletion of highly conserved motifs within this region identified two mutants that were deficient in binding RPA in vitro and highly defective in NER both in vitro and in vivo. A second domain mediating the interaction with RPA-34 was identified within the first 58 residues in XPA. Deletion of this region, however, only moderately affects the complementing activity of XPA in vivo. Finally, the XPA-RPA complex is shown to have a greater affinity for damaged DNA than XPA alone. Taken together, these results indicate that the interaction between XPA and RPA is required for NER but that only the interaction with RPA-70 is essential.     

Three-dimensional structural views of damaged-DNA recognition: T4 endonuclease V, E. coli Vsr protein, and human nucleotide excision repair factor XPA

Genetic information is frequently disturbed by introduction of modified or mismatch bases into duplex DNA, and hence all organisms contain DNA repair systems to restore normal genetic information by removing such damaged bases or nucleotides and replacing them by correct ones. The understanding of this repair mechanism is a central subject in cell biology. This review focuses on the three-dimensional structural views of damaged DNA recognition by three proteins. The first protein is T4 endonuclease V (T4 endo V), which catalyzes the first reaction step of the excision repair pathway to remove pyrimidine-dimers (PD) produced within duplex DNA by UV irradiation. The crystal structure of this enzyme complexed with DNA containing a thymidine-dimer provided the first direct view of DNA lesion recognition by a repair enzyme, indicating that the DNA kink coupled with base flipping-out is important for damaged DNA recognition. The second is very short patch repair (Vsr) endonuclease, which recognizes a TG mismatch within the five base pair consensus sequence. The crystal structure of this enzyme in complex with duplex DNA containing a TG mismatch revealed a novel mismatch base pair recognition scheme, where three aromatic residues intercalate from the major groove into the DNA to strikingly deform the base pair stacking but the base flipping-out does not occur. The third is human nucleotide excision repair (NER) factor XPA, which is a major component of a large protein complex. This protein has been shown to bind preferentially to UV- or chemical carcinogen-damaged DNA. The solution structure of the XPA central domain, essential for the interaction of damaged DNA, was determined by NMR. This domain was found to be divided mainly into a (Cys)4-type zinc-finger motif subdomain for replication protein A (RPA) recognition and the carboxyl terminal subdomain responsible for DNA binding.     

RPA stabilizes the XPA-damaged DNA complex through protein-protein interaction

The xeroderma pigmentosum group A complementing protein (XPA) and eukaryotic replication protein A (RPA) are among the major damage-recognition proteins involved in the early stage of nucleotide excision repair (NER). XPA and RPA are able to bind damaged DNA independently, although RPA interaction stimulates XPA binding to damaged DNA [Li, L., Lu, X., Peterson, C. A., and Legerski, R. J. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 5396-5402 (1); Stigger, E., Drissi, R., and Lee, S.-H. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 9337-9343 (2)]. In this study, we used surface plasmon resonance (SPR) analysis to investigate the interaction of XPA and RPA with two major types of UV-damaged DNA: the (6-4) photoproduct and the cis-syn cyclobutane dimer of thymidine. Both XPA and RPA preferentially bind to (6-4) photoproduct-containing duplex DNA over cis-syn cyclobutane dimer-containing DNA. The binding of XPA to (6-4) photoproduct was weak (K(D) = 2.13 x 10(-)(8) M), whereas RPA showed a very stable interaction with (6-4) photoproduct (K(D) = 2. 02 x 10(-)(10) M). When XPA and RPA were incubated together, the stability of the XPA-damaged DNA interaction was significantly enhanced by wild-type RPA. On the other hand, mutant RPA (RPA:p34Delta33C) defective in its interaction with XPA failed to stabilize XPA-damaged DNA complex. Taken together, our results suggest that a role for RPA in UV-damage recognition is to stabilize XPA-damaged DNA complex through protein-protein interaction.     

Damaged DNA-binding protein DDB stimulates the excision of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers in vitro in concert with XPA and replication protein A

Human cells contain a protein that binds to UV-irradiated DNA with high affinity. This protein, damaged DNA-binding protein (DDB), is a heterodimer of two polypeptides, p127 and p48. Recent in vivo studies suggested that DDB is involved in global genome repair of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs), but the mechanism remains unclear. Here, we show that in vitro DDB directly stimulates the excision of CPDs but not (6-4)photoproducts. The excision activity of cell-free extracts from Chinese hamster AA8 cell line that lacks DDB activity was increased 3-4-fold by recombinant DDB heterodimer but not p127 subunit alone. Moreover, the addition of XPA or XPA + replication protein A (RPA), which themselves enhanced excision, also enhanced the excision in the presence of DDB. DDB was found to elevate the binding of XPA to damaged DNA and to make a complex with damaged DNA and XPA or XPA + RPA as judged by both electrophoretic mobility shift assays and DNase I protection assays. These results suggest that DDB assists in the recognition of CPDs by core NER factors, possibly through the efficient recruitment of XPA or XPA.RPA, and thus stimulates the excision reaction of CPDs.     

DNA damage induced hyperphosphorylation of replication protein A. 2. Characterization of DNA binding activity, protein interactions, and activity in DNA replication and repair

Replication protein A (RPA) is a heterotrimeric protein consisting of 70-, 34-, and 14- kDa subunits that is required for many DNA metabolic processes including DNA replication and DNA repair. Using a purified hyperphosphorylated form of RPA protein prepared in vitro, we have addressed the effects of hyperphosphorylation on steady-state and pre-steady-state DNA binding activity, the ability to support DNA repair and replication reactions, and the effect on the interaction with partner proteins. Equilibrium DNA binding activity measured by fluorescence polarization reveals no difference in ssDNA binding to pyrimidine-rich DNA sequences. However, RPA hyperphosphorylation results in a decreased affinity for purine-rich ssDNA and duplex DNA substrates. Pre-steady-state kinetic analysis is consistent with the equilibrium DNA binding and demonstrates a contribution from both the k(on) and k(off) to achieve these differences. The hyperphosphorylated form of RPA retains damage-specific DNA binding, and, importantly, the affinity of hyperphosphorylated RPA for damaged duplex DNA is 3-fold greater than the affinity of unmodified RPA for undamaged duplex DNA. The ability of hyperphosphorylated RPA to support DNA repair showed minor differences in the ability to support nucleotide excision repair (NER). Interestingly, under reaction conditions in which RPA is maintained in a hyperphosphorylated form, we also observed inhibition of in vitro DNA replication. Analyses of protein-protein interactions bear out the effects of hyperphosphorylated RPA on DNA metabolic pathways. Specifically, phosphorylation of RPA disrupts the interaction with DNA polymerase alpha but has no significant effect on the interaction with XPA. These results demonstrate that the effects of DNA damage induced hyperphosphorylation of RPA on DNA replication and DNA repair are mediated through alterations in DNA binding activity and protein-protein interactions.     

DNA damage recognition during nucleotide excision repair in mammalian cells

For the bulk of mammalian DNA, the core protein factors needed for damage recognition and incision during nucleotide excision repair (NER) are the XPA protein, the heterotrimeric RPA protein, the 6 to 9-subunit TFIIH, the XPC-hHR23B complex, the XPG nuclease, and the ERCC1-XPF nuclease. With varying efficiencies, NER can repair a very wide range of DNA adducts, from bulky helical distortions to subtle modifications on sugar residues. Several of the NER factors have an affinity for damaged DNA. The strongest binding factor appears to be XPC-hHR23B but preferential binding to damage is also a property of XPA, RPA, and components of TFIIH. It appears that in order to be repaired by NER, an adduct in DNA must have two features: it must create a helical distortion, and there must be a change in DNA chemistry. Initial recognition of the distortion is the most likely function for XPC-hHR23B and perhaps XPA and RPA, whereas TFIIH is well-suited to locate the damaged DNA strand by locating altered DNA chemistry that blocks translocation of the XPB and XPD components.     

Photoactivated DNA analogs of substrates of the nucleotide excision repair system and their interaction with proteins of NER-competent HeLa cell extract

Photoactivated DNA analogs of nucleotide excision repair (NER) substrates have been created that are 48-mer duplexes containing in internal positions pyrimidine nucleotides with bulky substituents imitating lesions. Fluorochloroazidopyridyl, anthracenyl, and pyrenyl groups introduced using spacer fragments at 4N and 5C positions of dCMP and dUMP were used as model damages. The gel retardation and photo-induced affinity modification techniques were used to study the interaction of modified DNA duplexes with proteins in HeLa cell extracts containing the main components of NER protein complexes. It is shown that the extract proteins selectively bind and form covalent adducts with the model DNA. The efficiency and selectivity of protein modification depend on the structure of used DNA duplex. Apparent molecular masses of extract proteins, undergoing modification, were estimated. Mutual influence of simultaneous presence of extract proteins and recombinant NER protein factors XPC-HR23B, XPA, and RPA on interaction with the model DNA was analyzed. The extract proteins and RPA competed for interaction with photoactive DNA, mutually decreasing the yield of modification products. In this case the presence of extract proteins at particular concentrations tripled the increase in yield of covalent adducts formed by XPC. It is supposed that the XPC subunit interaction with DNA is stimulated by endogenous HR23B present in the extract. Most likely, the mutual effect of XPA and extract proteins stimulating formation of covalent adducts with model DNA is due to the interaction of XPA with endogenous RPA of the extract. A technique based on the use of specific antibodies revealed that RPA present in the extract is a modification target for photoactive DNA imitating NER substrates.     

Interaction of nucleotide excision repair factors RPA and XPA with DNA containing bulky photoreactive groups imitating damages

Interaction of nucleotide excision repair factors--replication protein A (RPA) and Xeroderma pigmentosum complementing group A protein (XPA)--with DNA structures containing nucleotides with bulky photoreactive groups imitating damaged nucleotides was investigated. Efficiency of photoaffinity modification of two proteins by photoreactive DNAs varied depending on DNA structure and type of photoreactive group. The secondary structure of DNA and, first of all, the presence of extended single-stranded parts plays a key role in recognition by RPA. However, it was shown that RPA efficiently interacts with DNA duplex containing a bulky substituent at the 5 -end of a nick. XPA was shown to prefer the nicked DNA; however, this protein was cross-linked with approximately equal efficiency by single-stranded and double-stranded DNA containing a bulky substituent inside the strand. XPA seems to be sensitive not only to the structure of DNA double helix, but also to a bulky group incorporated into DNA. The mechanism of damage recognition in the process of nucleotide excision repair is discussed.