Characterizing momentum change and viscous loss of a hemodynamic endpoint in assessment of coronary lesions

Myocardial fractional flow reserve (FFR(myo)) and coronary flow reserve (CFR), measured with guidewire, and quantitative angiography (QA) are widely used in combination to distinguish ischemic from non-ischemic coronary stenoses. Recent studies have shown that simultaneous measurements of FFR(myo) and CFR are recommended to dissociate conduit epicardial coronary stenoses from distal resistance microvascular disease. In this study, a more comprehensive diagnostic parameter, named as lesion flow coefficient, c, is proposed. The coefficient, c, which accounts for mean pressure drop, Delta p, mean coronary flow, Q, and percentage area stenosis, can be used to assess the hemodynamic severity of a coronary artery stenoses. Importantly, the contribution of viscous loss and loss due to momentum change for several lesion sizes can be distinguished using c. FFR(myo), CFR and c were calculated for pre-angioplasty, intermediate and post-angioplasty epicardial lesions, without microvascular disease. While hyperemic c decreased from 0.65 for pre-angioplasty to 0.48 for post-angioplasty lesion with guidewire of size 0.35 mm, FFR(myo) increased from 0.52 to 0.87, and CFR increased from 1.72 to 3.45, respectively. Thus, reduced loss produced by momentum change due to lower percentage area stenosis decreased c. For post-angioplasty lesion, c decreased from 0.55 to 0.48 with the insertion of guidewire. Hence, increased viscous loss due to the presence of guidewire decreased c compared with a lesion without guidewire. Further, c showed a linear relationship with FFR(myo), CFR and percentage area stenosis for pre-angioplasty, intermediate and post-angioplasty lesion. These baseline values of c were developed from fluid dynamics fundamentals for focal lesions, and provided a single hemodynamic endpoint to evaluate coronary stenosis severity.     

Evaluation of functional severity of coronary artery disease and fluid dynamics' influence on hemodynamic parameters: A review

Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) is responsible for most of the deaths in patients with cardiovascular diseases. Diagnostic coronary angiography analysis offers an anatomical knowledge of the severity of the stenosis. The functional or physiological significance is more valuable than the anatomical significance of CAD. Clinicians assess the functional severity of the stenosis by resorting to an invasive measurement of the pressure drop and flow. Hemodynamic parameters, such as pressure wire assessment fractional flow reserve (FFR) or Doppler wire assessment coronary flow reserve (CFR) are well-proven techniques to evaluate the physiological significance of the coronary artery stenosis in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Between the two techniques mentioned above, the FFR is seen as a very useful index. The presence of guide wire reduces the coronary flow which causes the underestimation of pressure drop across the stenosis which leads to dilemma for the clinicians in the assessment of moderate stenosis. In such condition, the fundamental fluid mechanics is useful in the development of new functional severity parameters such as pressure drop coefficient and lesion flow coefficient. Since the flow takes place in a narrowed artery, the blood behaves as a non-Newtonian fluid. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) allows a complete coronary flow simulation to study the relationship between the pressure and flow. This paper aims at explaining (i) diagnostic modalities for the evaluation of the CAD and valuable insights regarding FFR in the evaluation of the functional severity of the CAD (ii) the role of fluid dynamics in measuring the severity of CAD.     

Effect of simultaneous intracoronary guidewires on the predictive accuracy of functional parameters of coronary lesion severity

The aim of this study was to assess the influence of a second guidewire on the diagnostic accuracy of functional parameters of coronary lesion severity. Sixty-five patients with intermediate coronary lesions underwent myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Fractional flow reserve (FFR), coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR), and hyperemic stenosis resistance (HSR) index (HSR = stenosis pressure gradient / velocity) were determined in 77 lesions. Distal pressure and velocity were acquired simultaneously (dual wire) and sequentially (single wire) with two sensor-equipped guidewires. Overall, functional parameters deteriorated from single- to dual-wire assessment. In patients without ischemia, the good diagnostic performance of FFR, CFVR, and HSR deteriorated significantly (P < 0.001) when assessed by dual wires, with an increase in the number of false-positive results. This trend was more pronounced for HSR, since the presence of a second wire reduced maximal velocity and increased the pressure gradient. The presence of two guidewires, especially across a myocardial perfusion scintigraphy-induced nonsignificant lesion, is associated with overestimation of the hemodynamically assessed lesion severity and, therefore, is likely to have a major impact on clinical decision making. This underscores the advantage of a dual-sensor-equipped guidewire for the evaluation of stenosis severity by combined pressure and velocity measurements.     

Intermediate coronary artery stenosis: evidence-based decisions in interventions to avoid the oculostenotic reflex

The prevalence of intermediate coronary artery stenosis (defined as a diameter stenosis of 40% to 70%) is quite large in patients undergoing PTCA. The coronary angiogram is considered the 'gold standard' for the definition of coronary anatomy, in spite of various limitations associated with its use. In recent years, sensor tipped guidewire based methods of physiologic assessment of stenosis severity, like myocardial fractional flow reserve, and poststenotic coronary flow reserve had established their role in the decision making in catheterization laboratory. The decision making should combine morphologic and physiologic assessment as better evidence based approach in guiding therapy to avoid the 'oculostenotic reflex'.     

Hemodynamic diagnostics of epicardial coronary stenoses: <Emphasis Type="Italic">in-vitro</Emphasis> experimental and computational study

Background  

The severity of epicardial coronary stenosis can be assessed by invasive measurements of trans-stenotic pressure drop and flow. A pressure or flow sensor-tipped guidewire inserted across the coronary stenosis causes an overestimation in true trans-stenotic pressure drop and reduction in coronary flow. This may mask the true severity of coronary stenosis. In order to unmask the true severity of epicardial stenosis, we evaluate a diagnostic parameter, which is obtained from fundamental fluid dynamics principles. This experimental and numerical study focuses on the characterization of the diagnostic parameter, pressure drop coefficient, and also evaluates the pressure recovery downstream of stenoses.     

Influence of hemodynamic conditions on fractional flow reserve: parametric analysis of underlying model

Pressure-based fractional flow reserve (FFR) is used clinically to evaluate the functional severity of a coronary stenosis, by predicting relative maximal coronary flow (Q(s)/Q(n)). It is considered to be independent of hemodynamic conditions, which seems unlikely because stenosis resistance is flow dependent. Using a resistive model of an epicardial stenosis (0-80% diameter reduction) in series with the coronary microcirculation at maximal vasodilation, we evaluated FFR for changes in coronary microvascular resistance (R(cor) = 0.2-0.6 mmHg. ml(-1). min), aortic pressure (P(a) = 70-130 mmHg), and coronary outflow pressure (P(b) = 0-15 mmHg). For a given stenosis, FFR increased with decreasing P(a) or increasing R(cor). The sensitivity of FFR to these hemodynamic changes was highest for stenoses of intermediate severity. For P(b) > 0, FFR progressively exceeded Q(s)/Q(n) with increasing stenosis severity unless P(b) was included in the calculation of FFR. Although the P(b)-corrected FFR equaled Q(s)/Q(n) for a given stenosis, both parameters remained equally dependent on hemodynamic conditions, through their direct relationship to both stenosis and coronary resistance.     

Influence of heart rate on fractional flow reserve, pressure drop coefficient, and lesion flow coefficient for epicardial coronary stenosis in a porcine model

A limitation in the use of invasive coronary diagnostic indexes is that fluctuations in hemodynamic factors such as heart rate (HR), blood pressure, and contractility may alter resting or hyperemic flow measurements and may introduce uncertainties in the interpretation of these indexes. In this study, we focused on the effect of fluctuations in HR and area stenosis (AS) on diagnostic indexes. We hypothesized that the pressure drop coefficient (CDP(e), ratio of transstenotic pressure drop and distal dynamic pressure), lesion flow coefficient (LFC, square root of ratio of limiting value CDP and CDP at site of stenosis) derived from fluid dynamics principles, and fractional flow reserve (FFR, ratio of average distal and proximal pressures) are independent of HR and can significantly differentiate between the severity of stenosis. Cardiac catheterization was performed on 11 Yorkshire pigs. Simultaneous measurements of distal coronary arterial pressure and flow were performed using a dual sensor-tipped guidewire for HR < 120 and HR > 120 beats/min, in the presence of epicardial coronary lesions of <50% AS and >50% AS. The mean values of FFR, CDP(e), and LFC were significantly different (P < 0.05) for lesions of <50% AS and >50% AS (0.88 ± 0.04, 0.76 ± 0.04; 62 ± 30, 151 ± 35, and 0.10 ± 0.02 and 0.16 ± 0.01, respectively). The mean values of FFR and CDP(e) were not significantly different (P > 0.05) for variable HR conditions of HR < 120 and HR > 120 beats/min (FFR, 0.81 ± 0.04 and 0.82 ± 0.04; and CDP(e), 95 ± 33 and 118 ± 36). The mean values of LFC do somewhat vary with HR (0.14 ± 0.01 and 0.12 ± 0.02). In conclusion, fluctuations in HR have no significant influence on the measured values of CDP(e) and FFR but have a marginal influence on the measured values of LFC. However, all three parameters can significantly differentiate between stenosis severities. These results suggest that the diagnostic parameters can be potentially used in a better assessment of coronary stenosis severity under a clinical setting.     

Use and limitations of magnetic resonance phase-contrast assessment of coronary flow reserve in a model of collateral dependence

Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC-MRI) is useful for assessing coronary artery flow reserves (CFR) in man and acute animal models with intermediate coronary lesions. The present study examines the use of PC-MRI for assessing CFR in a model with critical stenosis and collateral dependence. PC-MRI quantitative flow measurements from the proximal left anterior descending (LAD) and left circumflex (LCX) coronary arteries were compared with myocardial tissue perfusion reserve measurements (microsphere techniques) after placement of a 2.25-mm ameroid constrictor on the proximal LCX in a porcine model; measurements were obtained at implantation (n = 4) and at 3 to 4 weeks (n = 4) and 6 weeks (n = 5) postimplantation. CFR is defined as the ratio of maximal hyperemic flow to baseline flow. Hyperemia was induced using intravenous adenosine (140 mg/kg/min). Collateral dependence in the LCX distri bution was evidenced by angiographic findings of critical stenosis with minimal myocardial histological changes and normal baseline myocardial perfusion (microsphere techniques). In this setting, PC-MRI CFR was correlated with microsphere measures of perfusion reserve. Collateral dependence was confirmed by Evan's blue dye injection. This study provides angiographic, myocardial perfusion, and histological correlates associated with PC-MRI epicardial CFR changes during chronic, progressive coronary artery constriction. It also demonstrates the disparity between epicardial and myocardial measures of coronary flow reserve with collateral dependence and the caveats for PC-MRI use in models of progressive coronary constriction.     

Association between coronary lesion severity and distal microvascular resistance in patients with coronary artery disease

Homogeneity of microvascular resistance in different perfusion areas of the same heart is generally assumed. We investigated the effect of the severity of an epicardial stenosis on microvascular resistance in 27 patients with coronary artery disease and stable angina. All patients had an angiographically normal coronary artery, an artery with an intermediate lesion, and an artery with a severe lesion; the latter was treated with angioplasty. In each patient, distal blood flow velocity and pressure were measured during baseline and maximal hyperemia (induced by intracoronary adenosine) using a Doppler and pressure guide wire, respectively. The ratio of mean distal pressure to average peak blood flow velocity was used as an index for the microvascular resistance (MRv). Within patients, the hyperemic MRv was higher in arteries with more severe stenosis (P = 0.021). After percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), the hyperemic MRv decreased (pre-PTCA, 2.6 vs. post-PTCA, 1.9 mmHg.cm(-1)s(-1), P < 0.01) toward the value of the reference artery (1.7 mmHg.cm(-1)s(-1); P = 0.67). We conclude that there is a positive association between coronary lesion severity and variability of distal microvascular resistance that normalizes after angioplasty. This study challenges the concept of uniform distribution of hyperemic MRv that is relevant for the interpretation of both noninvasive and invasive diagnostic tests.     

Influence of coronary collateral flow on coronary diagnostic parameters: An in vitro study

Functional severity of coronary stenosis is often assessed using diagnostic parameters. These parameters are evaluated from the combined pressure and/or flow measurements taken at the site of the stenosis. However, when there are functional collaterals operating downstream to the stenosis, the coronary flow-rate increases, and the pressure in the stenosed artery is altered. This effect of downstream collaterals on different diagnostic parameters is studied using a physiological representative in vitro coronary flow-loop.The three diagnostic parameters tested are fractional flow reserve (FFR), lesion flow coefficient (LFC), and pressure drop coefficient (CDP). The latter two were discussed in recent publications by our group (Banerjee et al., 2008, Banerjee et al., 2007, 2009). They are evaluated for three different severities of stenosis and tested for possible misinterpretation in the presence of variable collateral flows. Pressure and flow are measured with and without downstream collaterals. The diagnostic parameters are then calculated from these readings.In the case of intermediate stenosis (80% area blockage), FFR and LFC increased from 0.74 to 0.77 and 0.58 to 0.62, respectively, for no collateral to fully developed collateral flow. Also, CDP decreased from 47 to 42 for no collateral to fully developed collateral flow. These changes in diagnostic parameters might lead to erroneous postponement of coronary intervention. Thus, variability in diagnostic parameters for the same stenosis might lead to misinterpretation of stenosis severity in the presence of operating downstream collaterals.     

The Relationship between Endothelial Progenitor Cell Populations and Epicardial and Microvascular Coronary Disease—A Cellular,Angiographic and Physiologic Study

Background

Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) are implicated in protection against vascular disease. However, studies using angiography alone have reported conflicting results when relating EPCs to epicardial coronary artery disease (CAD) severity. Moreover, the relationship between different EPC types and the coronary microcirculation is unknown. We therefore investigated the relationship between EPC populations and coronary epicardial and microvascular disease.

Methods

Thirty-three patients with a spectrum of isolated left anterior descending artery disease were studied. The coronary epicardial and microcirculation were physiologically interrogated by measurement of fractional flow reserve (FFR), index of microvascular resistance (IMR) and coronary flow reserve (CFR). Two distinct EPC populations (early EPC and late outgrowth endothelial cells [OECs]) were isolated from these patients and studied ex vivo.

Results

There was a significant inverse relationship between circulating OEC levels and epicardial CAD severity, as assessed by FFR and angiography (r = 0.371, p = 0.04; r = -0.358, p = 0.04; respectively). More severe epicardial CAD was associated with impaired OEC migration and tubulogenesis (r = 0.59, p = 0.005; r = 0.589, p = 0.004; respectively). Patients with significant epicardial CAD (FFR<0.75) had lower OEC levels and function compared to those without hemodynamically significant stenoses (p<0.05). In contrast, no such relationship was seen for early EPC number and function, nor was there a relationship between IMR and EPCs. There was a significant relationship between CFR and OEC function.

Conclusions

EPC populations differ in regards to their associations with CAD severity. The number and function of OECs, but not early EPCs, correlated significantly with epicardial CAD severity. There was no relationship between EPCs and severity of coronary microvascular disease.     

Progressive epicardial coronary blood flow reduction fails to produce ST-segment depression at normal heart rates

ST-segment depression is commonly seen in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Most authors have attributed it to transient reductions in coronary blood flow due to nonocclusive thrombus formation on a disrupted atherosclerotic plaque and dynamic focal vasospasm at the site of coronary artery stenosis. However, ST-segment depression was never reproduced in classic animal models of coronary stenosis without the presence of tachycardia. We hypothesized that ST-segment depression occurring during acute coronary syndromes is not entirely explained by changes in epicardial coronary artery resistance and thus evaluated the effect of a slow, progressive epicardial coronary artery occlusion on the ECG and regional myocardial blood flow in anesthetized pigs. Slow, progressive occlusion over 72 min (SD 27) of the left anterior descending coronary artery in 20 anesthetized pigs led to a 90% decrease in coronary blood flow and the development of ST-segment elevation associated with homogeneous and transmural myocardial blood flow reductions, confirmed by microspheres and myocardial contrast echocardiography. ST-segment depression was not observed in any ECG lead before the development of ST-segment elevation. At normal heart rates, progressive epicardial stenosis of a coronary artery results in myocardial ischemia associated with homogeneous, transmural reduction in regional myocardial blood flow and ST-segment elevation, without preceding ST-segment depression. Thus, in coronary syndromes with ST-segment depression and predominant subendocardial ischemia, factors other than mere increases in epicardial coronary resistance must be invoked to explain the heterogeneous parietal distribution of flow and associated ECG changes.     

Attenuation of heart failure due to coronary stenosis by ACE inhibitor and angiotensin receptor blocker

It is not known how the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor and angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) attenuate heart failure (HF) in viable ischemic hearts. To assess HF in a rat coronary stenosis (CS) model, we administered vehicle and quinapril or candesartan (or both) orally for 12 wk. Compared with the sham group, the vehicle group showed impaired myocardial perfusion, impaired coronary endothelial nitric oxide (NO) function in vitro, exhausted myocardial mitochondrial respiration, larger left ventricular (LV) dimensions and lower ejection fraction, lower LV rate of pressure development over time (dP/dt), lower slopes of LV end-systolic pressure-dimension relations (ESPDRs), and increased myocardial fibrosis. Treatment with quinapril or candesartan ameliorated these parameters without modifying the epicardial CS severity. Moreover, their combination maintained similar myocardial perfusion, despite a trend toward lower blood pressure, and showed distinctive neurohumoral modulation, normalized mitochondrial respiration, and increased ESPDR slopes. Thus improved myocardial blood flow and coronary flow reserve by quinapril or candesartan are the key to alleviate CS-induced HF, and their combination may have a therapeutic significance partly through ameliorated mitochondrial respiration and improved LV systolic function.     

Évaluation de la perfusion myocardique par TEP-TDM

For the past decade, PET and PET/CT have been widely studied for myocardial perfusion imaging. Several studies demonstrated the incremental value of PET for the diagnostic and prognostic assessment of patients with coronary artery disease. Moreover, PET allows for non-invasively quantifying myocardial blood flow and myocardial flow reserve, that both are recognized as surrogate marker of cardiac event free survival. By enabling the exploration of epicardial disease and the microvasculature, PET constitutes a unique tool to study pathophysiogical mechanisms leading to atherosclerosis genesis. The recent emergence of high-tech hybrid machines may even provide further incremental information about coronary function and morphology. By taking the best of each modality, a better assessment of patients with coronary artery disease is expected.     

Assessment of coronary flow reserve in nuclear cardiology

The coronary flow reserve is a quantitative parameter defined by the ratio maximal myocardial blood flow to rest myocardial blood flow, which allows to give functional information on the whole coronary arterial tree, integrating both epicardial arteries and microcirculatory. The coronary flow reserve is a powerful tool to guide therapy and to assess prognosis. Exploratory tools, initially limited to experimental invasive techniques, have evolved over the last 10 years, allowing to envisage its use in daily clinical practice. This article reviews the pathophysiology of the coronary flow reserve and the various invasive and non-invasive exploration tools available to practitioners, integrating them into clinical practice.     

The new clinical standard of integrated quadruple stress echocardiography with ABCD protocol

Background

The detection of regional wall motion abnormalities is the cornerstone of stress echocardiography. Today, stress echo shows increasing trends of utilization due to growing concerns for radiation risk, higher cost and stronger environmental impact of competing techniques. However, it has also limitations: underused ability to identify factors of clinical vulnerability outside coronary artery stenosis; operator-dependence; low positivity rate in contemporary populations; intermediate risk associated with a negative test; limited value of wall motion beyond coronary artery disease. Nevertheless, stress echo has potential to adapt to a changing environment and overcome its current limitations.

Integrated-quadruple stress-echo

Four parameters now converge conceptually, logistically, and methodologically in the Integrated Quadruple (IQ)-stress echo. They are: 1- regional wall motion abnormalities; 2-B-lines measured by lung ultrasound; 3-left ventricular contractile reserve assessed as the stress/rest ratio of force (systolic arterial pressure by cuff sphygmomanometer/end-systolic volume from 2D); 4- coronary flow velocity reserve on left anterior descending coronary artery (with color-Doppler guided pulsed wave Doppler). IQ-Stress echo allows a synoptic functional assessment of epicardial coronary artery stenosis (wall motion), lung water (B-lines), myocardial function (left ventricular contractile reserve) and coronary small vessels (coronary flow velocity reserve in mid or distal left anterior descending artery). In “ABCD” protocol, A stands for Asynergy (ischemic vs non-ischemic heart); B for B-lines (wet vs dry lung); C for Contractile reserve (weak vs strong heart); D for Doppler flowmetry (warm vs cold heart, since the hyperemic blood flow increases the local temperature of the myocardium). From the technical (acquisition/analysis) viewpoint and required training, B-lines are the kindergarten, left ventricular contractile reserve the primary (for acquisition) and secondary (for analysis) school, wall motion the university, and coronary flow velocity reserve the PhD program of stress echo.

Conclusion

Stress echo is changing. As an old landline telephone with only one function, yesterday stress echo used one sign (regional wall motion abnormalities) for one patient with coronary artery disease. As a versatile smart-phone with multiple applications, stress echo today uses many signs for different pathophysiological and clinical targets. Large scale effectiveness studies are now in progress in the Stress Echo2020 project with the omnivorous “ABCD” protocol.

     

Increased basal coronary blood flow as a cause of reduced coronary flow reserve in diabetic patients

A reduced coronary flow reserve (CFR) has been demonstrated in diabetes, but the underlying mechanisms are unknown. We assessed thermodilution-derived CFR after 5-min intravenous adenosine infusion through a pressure-temperature sensor-tipped wire in 30 coronary arteries without significant lumen reduction in 30 patients: 13 with and 17 without a history of diabetes. We determined CFR as the ratio of basal and hyperemic mean transit times (T(mn)); fractional flow reserve (FFR) as the ratio of distal and proximal pressures at maximal hyperemia to exclude local macrovascular disease; and an index of microvascular resistance (IMR) as the distal coronary pressure at maximal hyperemia divided by the inverse of the hyperemic T(mn). We also assessed insulin resistance by the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) index. FFR was normal in all investigated arteries. CFR was significantly lower in diabetic vs. nondiabetic patients [median (interquartile range): 2.2 (1.4-3.2) vs. 4.1 (2.7-4.4); P = 0.02]. Basal T(mn) was lower in diabetic vs. nondiabetic subjects [median (interquartile range): 0.53 (0.25-0.71) vs. 0.64 (0.50-1.17); P = 0.04], while hyperemic T(mn) and IMR were similar. We found significant correlations at linear regression analysis between logCFR and the HOMA index (r(2) = 0.35; P = 0.0005) and between basal T(mn) and the HOMA index (r(2) = 0.44; P < 0.0001). In conclusion, compared with nondiabetic subjects, CFR is lower in patients with diabetes and epicardial coronary arteries free of severe stenosis, because of increased basal coronary flow, while hyperemic coronary flow is similar. Basal coronary flow relates to insulin resistance, suggesting a key role of cellular metabolism in the regulation of coronary blood flow.     

Assessment of coronary microcirculation in a swine animal model

Coronary microvascular dysfunction has important prognostic implications. Several hemodynamic indexes, such as coronary flow reserve (CFR), microvascular resistance, and zero-flow pressure (P(zf)), were used to establish the most reliable index to assess coronary microcirculation. Fifteen swine were instrumented with a flow probe, and a pressure wire was advanced into the distal left anterior descending artery. Adenosine was used to produce maximum hyperemia. Microspheres were used to create microvascular dysfunction. An occluder was used to produce stenosis. Blood flow from the probe (Q(p)), aortic pressure, distal coronary pressure, and right atrium pressure were recorded. Angiographic flow (Q(a)) was calculated using a time-density curve. Flow probe-based CFR and angiographic CFR were calculated using Q(p) and Q(a), respectively. Flow probe-based (NMR(qh)) and angiographic normalized microvascular resistance (NMR(ah)) were determined using Q(p) and Q(a), respectively, during hyperemia. P(zf) was calculated using Q(p) and distal coronary pressure. Two series of receiver operating characteristic curves were generated: normal epicardial artery model (N model) and stenosis model (S model). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for flow probe-based CFR, angiographic CFR, NMR(qh), NMR(ah), and P(zf) were 0.855, 0.836, 0.976, 0.956, and 0.855 in N model and 0.737, 0.700, 0.935, 0.889, and 0.698 in S model. Both NMR(qh) and NMR(ah) were significantly more reliable than CFR and P(zf) in detecting the microvascular deterioration. Compared with CFR and P(zf), NMR provided a more accurate assessment of microcirculation. This improved accuracy was more prevalent when stenosis existed. Moreover, NMR(ah) is potentially a less invasive method for assessing coronary microcirculation.     

Influence of serotonin on myocardial blood flow in the presence and absence of a coronary arterial stenosis: observations in domestic swine

This study tested the hypothesis that 5-HT may impair coronary flow regulation by inappropriately increasing arteriolar tone in the coronary circulation. Ten closed chest, domestic swine were studied both in the presence and in the absence of a severe artificial intraluminal coronary stenosis. A 5-French micromanometer catheter with fluid lumen was placed in the left anterior descending coronary artery and used to record pressure and infuse 5-HT (40 and 100 micrograms/min) into the coronary circulation. For the stenosis phase of the protocol the catheter was embedded in the artificial stenosis. Hemodynamics, regional myocardial blood flow (microsphere technique), coronary vascular resistance, lactate consumption, and oxygen metabolism were measured at control and at 5 min of each 5-HT dose. In the absence of coronary artery stenosis (i.e., full vasodilatory reserve), there was no change in regional myocardial blood flow or coronary vascular resistance during 5-HT infusion. In the presence of a severe coronary stenosis (i.e., limited vasodilator reserve) 5-HT produced a significant (P less than 0.05) decrease versus control in the distal left anterior descending: circumflex zone endocardial blood flow ratio (0.63 +/- 0.19, mean +/- 1 SD, to 0.55 +/- 0.15) and a significant (P less than 0.05) increase versus control in endocardial (50.6 +/- 16.6 to 61.2 +/- 19.8 mm Hg/ml/min/g) and transmural (49.9 +/- 9.5 to 57.2 +/- 12.8) coronary vascular resistance. Thus, 5-HT does not impair coronary flow regulation when full vasodilatory reserve is present. When coronary vasodilatory reserve is impaired by the presence of a severe proximal stenosis, 5-HT causes modest impairment of endocardial flow regulation.     

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Enhances Accelerative Wave Intensity in Coronary Arteries

Background

The systolic forward travelling compression wave (sFCW) and diastolic backward travelling decompression waves (dBEW) predominantly accelerate coronary blood flow. The effect of a coronary stenosis on the intensity of these waves in the distal vessel is unknown. We investigated the relationship between established physiological indices of hyperemic coronary flow and the intensity of the two major accelerative coronary waves identified by Coronary Wave Intensity analysis (CWIA).

Methodology / Principal Findings

Simultaneous intracoronary pressure and velocity measurement was performed during adenosine induced hyperemia in 17 patients with pressure / Doppler flow wires positioned distal to the target lesion. CWI profiles were generated from this data. Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) and Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve (CFVR) were calculated concurrently. The intensity of the dBEW was significantly correlated with FFR (R = -0.70, P = 0.003) and CFVR (R = -0.73, P = 0.001). The intensity of the sFCW was also significantly correlated with baseline FFR (R = 0.71, p = 0.002) and CFVR (R = 0.59, P = 0.01). Stenting of the target lesion resulted in a median 178% (interquartile range 55–280%) (P<0.0001) increase in sFCW intensity and a median 117% (interquartile range 27–509%) (P = 0.001) increase in dBEW intensity. The increase in accelerative wave intensity following PCI was proportionate to the baseline FFR and CFVR, such that stenting of lesions associated with the greatest flow limitation (lowest FFR and CFVR) resulted in the largest increases in wave intensity.

Conclusions

Increasing ischemia severity is associated with proportionate reductions in cumulative intensity of both major accelerative coronary waves. Impaired diastolic microvascular decompression may represent a novel, important pathophysiologic mechanism driving the reduction in coronary blood flow in the setting of an epicardial stenosis.