Recurrent deformities following reduction mammaplasty and correction of breast asymmetry

In order to properly evaluate results after reduction mammaplasty and correction of breast asymmetry, it is necessary to follow patients for several years. Cases are presented in which unusual deformities occurred after an initial satisfactory result. Pregnancy, aging, and fluctuations in weight contributed to these deformities. A case of recurrent hypertrophy 4 years following a reduction mammaplasty is presented. Several cases of asymmetry corrected by a combination of reduction and augmentation had early satisfactory results but several years later again showed asymmetry due to recurrent ptosis or atrophy. In one case, a 10-year follow-up showed considerable deformity after an initial good result following asymmetrical augmentation. It is important to point out to patients that changes do occur and that occasionally additional surgery is necessary.     

Nasal augmentation with Surgicel-wrapped diced cartilage: a review of 67 consecutive cases

Cartilage grafting has been used extensively to correct both the functional and aesthetic aspects of the nasal framework. The technique described by Erol ( 105: 2229, 2000) uses Surgicel-wrapped diced cartilage grafts in rhinoplasties. The advantages include its ease of preparation, the large volume of graft substrate available for use, and the avoidance of contour irregularities in the areas of placement. A retrospective case review of 67 consecutive patients who were treated with a Surgicel-wrapped diced cartilage graft as part of an aesthetic and/or functional rhinoplasty, in a 5-year period between 1995 and 2000, was performed in this study. All cases of congenital nasal deformities or deformities caused by trauma or tumors in which the technique was used were excluded. The charts were reviewed to determine demographic variables, the surgical procedures performed, prior operations, the rhinoplasty approach used, and the graft donor and recipient sites. Preoperative and postoperative photographs were examined, and the results were assessed. Data on the donor and recipient sites, complications, and the necessity for revisionary procedures were tabulated. There were two complications, namely, an infection, which resolved with aspiration and oral antibiotic therapy, and a recurrence of a dorsal depression, which necessitated repeated augmentation within 6 months. The technique of using Surgicel-wrapped diced cartilage proved to be effective for the augmentation of various areas of the nose. The complication and revision rates were acceptable and comparable to those of other techniques. Patient satisfaction with the aesthetic results was rated highly, with no reports of graft extrusion or contour irregularities. This technique is recommended for nasal augmentation and contouring for selected rhinoplasty patients.     

Clinical applications of three-dimensional photography in breast surgery

Three-dimensional imaging in breast surgery has several uses clinically. The most practical applications are for the evaluation of breast asymmetries, both congenital and acquired, and for the evaluation of factors affecting breast shape in augmentation mammaplasty. Other uses of three-dimensional imaging that we have found clinically helpful are for evaluation of patients desiring reduction mammaplasty and for evaluation of patients undergoing unilateral breast reconstruction to determine the expander and permanent implant size that gives the best symmetry with the contralateral breast. We present five cases in which we investigate the use of three-dimensional imaging clinically by using the images to determine quantitative information about the breast, such as volume or projection. Overall, three-dimensional imaging is very helpful in providing objective information about the breast for use in preoperative planning. In addition, by analyzing clinical cases, it can provide objective data about the breast and surgical mammaplasty (especially augmentation mammaplasty) that may help surgeons better understand those factors that contribute to breast shape and influence surgical outcomes. There are currently some limitations of this system, influenced by patients with significant ptosis or obesity, which may introduce errors into the three-dimensional data, making them unreliable. However, we believe three-dimensional imaging has great clinical potential in surgical mammaplasty.     

Connective-tissue disease following breast augmentation: a preliminary test of the human adjuvant disease hypothesis

It has been proposed that scleroderma in particular or connective-tissue diseases in general may be caused by exposure to silicone-containing materials used for breast augmentation. We performed a historical cohort study to estimate the point prevalence of this potential complication sometimes referred to as "human adjuvant disease." Three-hundred and seventy-eight patients who underwent augmentation mammaplasty with silicone-containing envelope-type prostheses from 1970 through 1981 were surveyed. Regional musculoskeletal syndromes, fibrositis, or osteoarthritis occurred in a third (38 of 125) of our responders. No patient developed an inflammatory systemic rheumatic disease during the period of observation (mean 6.8 years for the 125 subjects). Using calculations based on risk for development of rheumatic disease, it does not appear likely that augmentation mammaplasty is a significant or major inducer of inflammatory connective-tissue diseases in general. However, the number of patients surveyed was small, and our results must be considered preliminary. We could not exclude a specific risk for the development of scleroderma.     

Subfascial periareolar augmentation mammaplasty

Subfascial placement of implants was introduced 3 years ago. Collected data reveal very promising short-term and long-term results in comparison with subglandular and subpectoral positioned implants. The clinical experiences of 69 breast augmentations in the subfascial position are reported. The indications for this technique are proposed. The incidence of complications is described from clinical experiences and compared with that for other methods. From January of 1998 through May of 2002, 328 patients underwent periareolar augmentation mammaplasty; 105 patients had a subglandular mammaplasty, 154 patients had a subpectoral mammaplasty, and from August of 1999 through May of 2002, 69 patients had a subfascial augmentation mammaplasty. The mean postoperative follow-up time was 3.6 years in the subglandular group, 3.5 years in the subpectoral group, and 2.9 years in the subfascial group. In comparing the results of the subglandular augmentation group with those of the subpectoral and subfascial augmentation groups, the total rate of complications diminished significantly. The long-term complications of severe capsular contracture, rippling, and nipple sensation and numbness in subglandular augmentation mammaplasty could be significantly reduced (p < 0.05). The subfascial augmentation mammaplasty unites all the advantages of the subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty but eliminates the disadvantages of increased postoperative discomfort and disturbing muscle movement of the breast.     

The management of anterior chest wall deformity in patients presenting for breast augmentation

Anterior chest wall asymmetry is sometimes encountered in patients presenting for consideration of breast augmentation. The chest wall asymmetry or deficiency may be significant enough to consider reconstruction at the same time as breast augmentation in a small number of cases. Customized and prefabricated chest wall implants have been used in a variety of conditions including Poland syndrome, pectus excavatum, and sunken anterior chest. Careful moulage preparation and on-table implant modification are needed to "seat" these implants on the skeletal chest wall under the pectoralis major muscle. The chest wall implant provides a base for the subsequent breast prostheses and fills up a bony deficit that cannot be camouflaged by the breast prostheses alone.     

Evaluating breast parenchymal maldistribution with regard to mastopexy and augmentation mammaplasty

Mammary parenchymal maldistribution or lower-pole hypoplasia, a first cousin of the tubular breast deformity, is a common condition complicating the selection of patients for retropectoral augmentation mammaplasty and/or mastopexy. The eccentric mammary parenchyma must be released from the pectoral fascia to obtain good results with augmentation mammaplasty and to minimize the necessity for mastopexy.     

Physical and psychosocial symptoms among 88 volunteer subjects compared with patients seeking plastic surgery procedures to the breast

In an investigation of the relationship between macromastia and physical and psychosocial symptoms, 88 female university students, 21 augmentation mammaplasty patients, and 31 breast reduction patients graded somatic and psychosocial symptoms. The intent of the study was to discover which complaints were most common among women presenting for reduction mammaplasty and to determine whether height/weight index and brassiere chest measurement and cup size might affect their symptoms. Both the student group and the augmentation mammaplasty patients differed significantly from the breast reduction patients. Eighty-one percent of the reduction patients complained of neck and back pain. Seventy-seven percent complained of shoulder pain, 58 percent complained of chafing or rash; 45 percent reported significant limitation in their activity; and 52 percent were unhappy with their appearance (p < 0.001 compared with augmentation and student groups). Physical symptoms were related to height/weight index and bra chest and cup sizes in each of the three participating groups. It was found that patients who present for symptom-related reduction mammaplasty have a disease-specific group of physical and psychosocial complaints that are more directly related to large breast size than to being overweight.     

Refinements in extracorporal septoplasty

Septal deviations interfere with nasal airflow and contribute to deformities in the external appearance of the nose. An aesthetically and functionally satisfactory correction of severe septal deformities or "crippled" septal plates often requires a temporary intraoperative removal of the septal cartilage for appropriate remodeling. This article describes refinements to the previously described technique of extracorporal septoplasty; these refinements have proven useful and have made the procedure safer in the hands of less experienced surgeons. The refinements simplify the straightening methods for the explanted septal plate, achieving a stable and median fixation of the replanted septum while maintaining a satisfactory contour of the nasal dorsum. A milling cutter is used to straighten the irregularities of the explanted septal plate and to thin broadly based anterior nasal spines. When necessary, microplates are added to stabilize the osteotomized and medialized anterior nasal spine. The final positioning of the replanted septal plate is greatly enhanced by a rein stitch, transosseous sutures, and multiple quilt stitches. Additionally, direct fixation of the replanted septum to the edges of the upper lateral cartilages further improves the stability of the reconstruction. Finally, particular care should be taken to avoid residual irregularities of the nasal dorsum; it they occur, these irregularities can be covered with a thin cartilaginous splint or a layer of dehydrated fascia lata or autologous temporal fascia. A total of 436 patients who underwent rhinoseptoplasties at the authors' department during a 1-year period were reviewed. Of these patients, 108 presented with severe septal deviations and underwent an extracorporal septoplasty using the refined techniques described herein. Despite the complexity of the procedure, the patients' satisfaction rates were high, independent of the operating surgeon.     

Grafting the nasal dorsum with tandem ear cartilage

A technique for autogenous grafting of the nasal dorsum with ear cartilage is suggested based on the results of 25 consecutive cases. The technique involves (1) harvesting the entire cymba conchae and cavum conchae of the ear; (2) separating them and suturing them to each other in tandem fashion; (3) filling the underside concavity of the cymba conchae part of the graft with scraps of cartilage; (4) avoiding any bruising or crushing of the graft; and (5) filling any minor residual irregularities of the dorsum with soft tissue or cartilage from the cephalic trim of the lateral crus. The results suggest a consistent augmentation of the nasal dorsum for deficiencies from 3 to 6 mm in size. Four of the 25 cases did require secondary correction for dorsal convexity, inadequate augmentation, and surface irregularities. The technique, however, has been helpful in that ear cartilage is invariably available, allowing septum to be used for more important grafts. The procedure is easily performed under local anesthesia with no significant distortion to the donor site.     

Augmentation mammaplasty in male-to-female transsexuals

Hormonal therapy and gender-confirming surgery are the treatments of choice in appropriately selected male-to-female transsexuals. Penectomy and vaginoplasty are the paramount surgical requests of the male transsexual, but breast enlargement greatly increases subjective feelings of femininity. There are only limited reports on augmentation mammaplasty in male transsexuals, and hardly any attention has been paid to the differences between the female mammary anatomy and its male counterpart. The basic anatomic and surgical considerations of augmentation mammaplasty for 201 male-to-female transsexuals who were operated on from 1979 to 1997 are reviewed and discussed. They include the differences between male and female anatomy and how to feminize the male chest, the results of hormonal therapy and the proper timing of surgery, the choice of implant size and surgical approach, the results that may be expected after surgery, and the implications of all mentioned on the long-term outcome and follow-up after augmentation mammaplasty. Because the referring doctor may not check on the breasts or may not be trained to examine augmented breasts for pathologic conditions, the mammaplastic surgeon has an obligation to ensure the proper follow-up of these patients.     

The use of alloderm for the correction of nasal contour deformities

What rhinoplasty surgeon has not been frustrated by unmet expectations from unreliable graft materials? The quest for an ideal graft continues. Septal cartilage is not always adequate in amount or substance. Ear cartilage may cause unsightly irregularities over time. Cranial bone or rib harvest sites add to the complexity of the procedure and can be intimidating for many operators. This article describes the authors' successful experience with AlloDerm onlay grafts for the correction of nasal contour deformities in 58 primary and secondary rhinoplasty cases by means of the open and endonasal approaches. Forty-two patients received an open-approach procedure; the remaining 16 received grafting through an endonasal or closed approach. Thirty-seven of the patients were secondary rhinoplasty patients, and some underwent multiple nasal corrections. The indications, intraoperative surgical technique of graft placement, and representative results will be discussed. Long-term follow-up showed good results, though partial graft resorption occurred in some patients. Overall, this experience with AlloDerm for nasal augmentation was encouraging.     

Cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery in blacks

Black women have not embraced cosmetic and reconstructive surgery of the breast with the same enthusiasm as their Caucasian counterparts because of fear of hypertrophic scars. The authors offer suggestions on how to minimize the scarring associated with breast surgery in black women. They feel that intraareolar incisions should be used whenever circumareolar incisions are indicated in augmentation mammaplasty, because the areola, being a favored area, is less likely to produce hypertrophic scars. The Marchac technique of reduction mammaplasty is recommended because it produces a short horizontal scar of 5 to 8 cm confined to the breast without medial and lateral extension, which may hypertrophy in black women. In the reduction of large breasts, secondary excision of dogears 6 or more weeks after mammaplasty reduces the medial and lateral extents of the scar. The use of liposuction as an adjunct to reduction mammaplasty may also accomplish the same thing. Amputation and free nipple-areola grafting should be used with caution in black patients because of the tendency of the grafted areola to hypopigment. In postmastectomy reconstruction, the authors suggest that the techniques described by Ryan and Radovan should be considered first before the techniques of reconstruction utilizing myocutaneous flaps. In these procedures, no new scars which may hypertrophy are created away from the site of reconstruction. Staples should not be used in skin closure in blacks because they cause cross-hatching of the wound even when removed early.     

Anterior thoracic hypoplasia: a separate entity from Poland syndrome

SUMMARY: Women presenting with anterior thoracic depression, breast hypoplasia, and subsequent asymmetry are often diagnosed with Poland syndrome regardless of pectoralis involvement, or are placed in the generic category of breast asymmetry or skeletal dysplasias. Recently, though, the term "sunken chest" has been used to describe forms of chest wall depression that previously may have fallen under generic skeletal dysplasias. The authors believe that, combined with hypoplasia of the ipsilateral breast, superior location of the nipple-areola complex compared with the contralateral side, and normal pectoralis muscles, this represents a previously undefined and real condition called anterior thoracic hypoplasia. During the past 4 years, the authors have treated eight women who have presented with a diagnosis of Poland syndrome or pectus excavatum, all of whom share the same characteristics-unilateral sunken anterior chest wall, hypoplasia of the breast, superiorly placed nipple-areola complex, normal pectoralis muscle, and normal sternal position. All of the patients underwent correction of breast asymmetry and unilateral anterior thoracic hypoplasia with augmentation mammaplasty, a method that when tailored for each side yields good aesthetic results. The average age of the patients was 31 years and the average chest size was 34. Cup size, as measured by the patient's standard bra, was a B on the nonaffected side in all patients and an A on the affected side in all patients except one. Of the eight patients, seven had the right anterior chest and breast involved, whereas one patient had involvement on the left. For all of the patients, the nipple and areola of the hypoplastic side were smaller and in a more superior position compared with the contralateral side on visual inspection. In the eight patients, a total of 19 augmentations (15 primary augmentations and four revisions) and one mastopexy were performed. Ten inframammary-fold approaches and nine periareolar approaches were used, and all of the implants were placed in a partial submuscular position, except for two implants placed in a subglandular position that were converted to partial submuscular positions in a secondary setting. In all the women, the sternal head of the pectoralis muscle was present and the pectoralis muscle appeared to be equal in size compared to the contralateral side. Nine different types of implants were used. Average implant fill volume measured 412 cc on the hypoplastic side and 257 cc on the contralateral side. In follow-up, all of the patients were satisfied with their operation and rated their aesthetic outcome as very good to excellent. The authors believe that anterior thoracic hypoplasia is a real, previously misdiagnosed and undescribed condition, and that both chest wall and breast deformities can be corrected safely and with excellent results using proper augmentation planning and implant selection.     

Dual plane breast augmentation: optimizing implant-soft-tissue relationships in a wide range of breast types

In breast augmentation, surgeons usually choose a pocket location for the implant behind breast parenchyma (retromammary), partially behind the pectoralis major muscle (partial retropectoral), or totally behind pectoralis major and serratus (total submuscular). Each of these implant pocket locations has specific indications, but each also has a unique set of tradeoffs. When applied to a wide range of breast types, each pocket location has limitations. Glandular ptotic and constricted lower pole breasts offer unique challenges that often are not solved without tradeoffs when using a strictly retromammary, partial retropectoral, or total submuscular pocket. This article describes specific indications and techniques for a dual plane approach to breast augmentation in several different breast types, introducing techniques that combine retromammary and partial retropectoral pocket locations in a single patient to optimize the benefits of each pocket location while limiting the tradeoffs and risks of a single pocket location. A total of 468 patients had dual plane augmentation between January of 1992 and March of 1998 using the specific techniques of dual plane augmentation described in this article. All patients were treated as outpatients and received general anesthesia. Indications, operative techniques, results, and complications for this series of patients are presented. Dual plane augmentation mammaplasty adjusts implant and tissue relationships to ensure adequate soft-tissue coverage while optimizing implant-soft-tissue dynamics to offer increased benefits and fewer tradeoffs compared with a single pocket location in a wide range of breast types.     

Breast deformities and mastopexy

LEARNING OBJECTIONS: After reviewing this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Appreciate the diversity of approaches for the correction of breast deformities and mastopexy. 2. Review the salient literature. 3. Understand patient selection criteria and indications. SUMMARY: Breast deformities and mastopexy continue to challenge plastic surgeons. Deformities such as Poland syndrome, tuberous breast, gynecomastia, and other congenital conditions are uncommon; therefore, management experience is often limited. Various techniques have been described, with no general consensus regarding optimal management. Mastopexy has become more common and is performed both with and without augmentation mammaplasty. However, a variety of techniques are available, and a thorough understanding of the indications, patient selection criteria, and techniques is important to optimize outcomes. This article will review these and other conditions to provide a better understanding of the current available data and evidence for these operations.     

Radical correction of secondary nasal deformity in unilateral cleft lip patients presenting late

It is universally acknowledged that correction of a cleft lip nasal deformity continues to be a difficult problem. In developing countries, it is common for patients with cleft lip deformities to present in their early or late teens for correction of severe secondary lip and nasal deformities retained after the initial repairs were carried out in infancy or early childhood. Such patients have never had the benefit of primary nasal correction, orthodontic management, or alveolar bone grafting at an appropriate age. Along with a severe nasal deformity, they present with alveolar arch malalignments and anterior fistulae. In the study presented here, a strategy involving a complete single-stage correction of the nasal and secondary lip deformity was used.In this study, 26 patients (nine male and 17 female) ranging in age from 13 to 24 years presented for the first time between June of 1996 and December of 1999 with unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity. Eight patients had an anterior fistula (diameter, 2 to 4 mm) and 12 patients had a secondary lip deformity. An external rhinoplasty approach was used for all patients. The corrective procedures carried out in a single stage in these patients included lip revision; columellar lengthening; repair of anterior fistula; augmentation along the pyriform margin, nasal floor, and alveolus by bone grafts; submucous resection of the nasal septum; repositioning of lower lateral cartilages; fixation of the alar cartilage complex to the septum and the upper lateral cartilages; augmentation of nasal dorsum by bone graft; and alar base wedge resections. Medial and lateral nasal osteotomies were performed only if absolutely indicated. The median follow-up period was 11 months, although it ranged from 5 to 25 months. Overall results have been extremely pleasing, satisfactory, and stable.In this age group (13 years of age or older), it is not fruitful to use a technique for nasal correction that corrects only one facet of the deformity, because no result of nasal correction can be satisfactory until septal deviations and maxillary deficiencies are addressed along with any alar repositioning. The results of complete remodeling of the nasal pyramid are also stable in these patients because the patients' growth was nearly complete, and all the deformities could be corrected at the same time, leaving no active deforming vector. These results would indicate that aesthetically good results are achievable even if no primary nasal correction or orthodontic management had been previously attempted.     

The correction of capsular contracture by conversion to "dual-plane" positioning: technique and outcomes

Little has been published regarding the treatment of patients with long-established capsular contracture after previous submuscular or subglandular breast augmentation. This study reviews 7 years of experience in treating established capsular contracture after augmentation mammaplasty by relocating implants to the "dual-plane" or partly subpectoral position. A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients who were treated for capsular contracture using this technique between 1993 and 1999. Data collected included the date of the original augmentation, the original implant location, date of revision and type of implant used, length of follow-up, outcome, and any ensuing complications. Different surgical techniques were used, depending on whether the prior implant was located in a subglandular or submuscular plane. All patients had revisions such that their implants were relocated to a dual plane, with the superior two thirds or so of the implant located beneath the pectoralis major muscle and the inferior one third located subglandularly. Of 85 patients reviewed, 54 had their original implants in a submuscular position and 31 had their initial augmentation in a subglandular position. Of the 54 patients whose implants were initially submuscular, 23 patients (43 percent) had silicone gel implants, 15 patients (28 percent) had double-lumen implants, and the remaining 16 patients (30 percent) had saline implants. Of the 31 patients whose implants were initially subglandular, 20 patients (65 percent) had silicone gel implants, three patients (10 percent) had double-lumen implants, and the remaining eight patients (26 percent) had saline implants. Fifty-one patients (60 percent) had replacement with saline implants (37 smooth saline, 14 textured saline), whereas 34 (40 percent) had silicone gel implants (seven smooth gel, 27 textured gel). The average time from previous augmentation to revision was 9 years 9 months. The average follow-up time after conversion to the dual-plane position was 11.5 months. Only three of 85 patients required reoperation for complications, all of which involved some degree of implant malposition. Of patients converted to the dual plane, 98 percent were free of capsular contracture and were Baker class I at follow-up, whereas 2 percent were judged as Baker class II. There were no Baker level III or IV contractures at follow-up. The dual-plane method of breast augmentation has proved to be an effective technique for correcting established capsular contracture after previous augmentation mammaplasty. This technique appears to be effective when performed with either silicone or saline-filled implants.     

Guidelines in concentric mastopexy

The scope and technique of concentric mastopexy remain unclear and controversial. In our hands, the procedure has application for mild nipple ptosis, glandular ptosis, and areola asymmetry, as well as the tuberous breast. Early disappointment has changed to increasing satisfaction as we have gained confidence in predicting our results based on the identification of three simple principles of concentric mastopexy. The first and most important, which states Doutside less than or equal to Doriginal + (Doriginal - Dinside), requires that the outer concentric circle must be drawn not to exceed the original areola diameter by more than the original areola diameter exceeds the inner concentric circle diameter. The second principle, Doutside less than or equal to 2 X Dinside, recommends that the outer circle diameter be drawn not to exceed twice that of the inner circle, to prevent poor scarring or over flattening of the breast. The third principle, Dfinal = 1/2(Doutside + Dinside), allows prediction of the final areola size as the average of the diameters of the inner and outer concentric circles. These three principles allow excision of a maximum amount of areola and periareola skin without the side effect of poor scars, dilated areola, or misshapened breasts. Applying these three principles to concentric mastopexy with or without augmentation mammaplasty, one may confidently correct a wide variety of deformities, producing more symmetrical, attractive breasts with areolae of a predictable size.     

Segmental bone and cartilage reconstruction of major nasal dorsal defects

This article describes the results of segmental bone and cartilage reconstruction of significant nasal dorsal defects. Solid bone graft reconstructions frequently lead to an unnatural hardness of the nasal tip. Rib cartilage reconstructions are pliable and soft but are a problem because they easily undergo warpage. The operation is performed using the open approach. Outer cranial bone graft is used for the bone component and extends at least two-thirds of the length of the dorsum. It is secured in place with a compression screw and a Kirschner wire. The cartilage component consists of an abbreviated L strut constructed of septal or conchal cartilage. It is slotted into the cranial bone in a tongue-in-groove manner and is sutured to it through a drill hole in the bone. The dorsal profile is completed with a single cartilage onlay graft or multiple sagittal cartilage grafts secured to the sides of the L strut. Twelve patients underwent segmental reconstruction of nasal deformities. Within this group, five patients underwent secondary rhinoplasty, five underwent posttraumatic rhinoplasty, and two underwent nose augmentation for Oriental features. There were seven men and five women. In all cases, good nasal tip mobility was maintained, and the nasal tips were soft. The interface between the bone graft and cartilage graftwas well camouflaged. The two did not separate. This procedure follows the principle of replacing lost tissue with like materials.