Inhibition of the reoxidation of the secondary electron acceptor of Photosystem II by bicarbonate depletion

In bicarbonate-depleted chloroplasts, the chlorophyll a fluorescence decayed with a halftime of about 150 ms after the third flash, and appreciably faster after the first and second flash of a series of flashes given after a dark period. After the fourth to twentieth flashes, the decay was also slow. After addition of bicarbonate, the decay was fast after all the flashes of the sequence. This indicates that the bicarbonate depletion inhibits the reoxidation of the secondary acceptor R²⁻ by the plastoquinone pool; R is the secondary electron acceptor of pigment system II, as it accepts electrons from the reduced form of the primary electron acceptor (Q⁻). This conclusion is consistent with the measurements of the DCMU (3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea)-induced chlorophyll a fluorescence after a series of flashes in the presence and the absence of bicarbonate, if it is assumed that DCMU not only causes reduction of Q if added in the state QR⁻, but also if added in the state QR²⁻.     

Cooperativity between Photosystem II centers at the level of primary electron transfer

1. Spinach chloroplasts, but not whole Chlorella cells, show an acceleration of the Photosystem II turnover time when excited by non-saturating flashes (exciting 25 % of centers) or when excited by saturating flashes for 85–95 % inhibition by 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea. Following dark adaptation, the turnover is accelerated after a non-saturating flash, preceded by none or several saturating flashes, and primarily after a first saturating flash for 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea inhibition. A rapid phase ($\text{t}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}$ approx. 0.75 s) is observed for the deactivation of State S₂ in the presence of 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea.2. These accelerated relaxations suggest that centers of Photosystem II are interconnected at the level of the primary electron transfer and compete for primary oxidizing equivalents in a saturating flash. The model in best agreement with the experimental data consists of a paired interconnection of centers.3. Under the conditions mentioned above, an accelerated turnover may be observed following a flash for centers in S₀, S₁ or S₂ prior to the flash. This acceleration is interpreted in terms of a shift of the rate-limiting steps of Photosystem II turnover from the acceptor to the donor side.     

Determination and modification of the redox state of the secondary acceptor of Photosystem II in the dark

The redox state of the secondary electron acceptor B of Photosystem II was studied using fluorescence measurements. Preillumination of algae or chloroplasts with a variable number of short saturating flashes followed rapidly by the addition of 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1, 1-dimethylurea induces oscillations of the initial level of fluorescence. The phase of these oscillations is characteristic of a given $\text{B}\text{B}{}^{\mathrm{?}}$ ratio in the dark-adapted samples.We conclude from our results that about 50% of the secondary electron acceptors are singly reduced in the dark in Chlorella cells, but that more than 70% are fully oxidized in the dark adapted chloroplasts.Benzoquinone treatment modifies this distribution in Chlorella leading to the same situation as in chloroplasts, i.e. more than 70% of the secondary acceptors are oxidized in the dark.The same ratio is observed if these algae are illuminated and then dark-adapted, unless an artificial donor (hydroxylamine) is added before this illumination. In that case about 50% B^? is generated and stabilized in the dark.     

Light-induced changes of absorbance and electron spin resonance in small Photosystem II particles

Photosystem II reaction center components have been studied in small system II particles prepared with digitonin. Upon illumination the reduction of the primary acceptor was indicated by absorbance changes due to the reduction of a plastoquinone to the semiquinone anion and by a small blue shift of absorption bands near 545 nm (C550) and 685 nm. The semiquinone to chlorophyll ratio was between 1/20 and 1/70 in various preparations. The terminal electron donor in this reaction did not cause large absorbance changes but its oxidized form was revealed by a hitherto unknown electron spin resonance (ESR) signal, which had some properties of the well-known signal II but a linewidth and g-value much nearer to those of signal I. Upon darkening absorbance and ESR changes decayed together in a cyclic or back reaction which was stimulated by 3-(3,4 dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea. The donor could be oxidized by ferricyanide in the dark.

Illumination in the presence of ferricyanide induced absorbance and ESR changes, rapidly reversed upon darkening, which may be ascribed to the oxidation of a chlorophyll a dimer, possibly the primary electron donor of photosystem II. In addition an ESR signal with 15 to 20 gauss linewidth and a slower dark decay was observed, which may have been caused by a secondary donor.     

Photooxidation of cytochrome b559 and the electron donors in chloroplast Photosystem II

The effect of light on the reaction center of Photosystem II was studied by differential absorption spectroscopy in spinach chloroplasts.

At − 196 °C, continuous illumination results in a parallel reduction of C-550 and oxidation of cytochrome b₅₅₉ high potential. With flash excitation, C-550 is reduced, but only a small fraction of cytochrome b₅₅₉ is oxidized. The specific effect of flash illumination is suppressed if the chloroplasts are preilluminated by one flash at 0 °C.

At − 50 °C, continuous illumination results in the reduction of C-550 but little oxidation of cytochrome b₅₅₉. However, complete oxidation is obtained if the chloroplasts have been preilluminated by one flash at 0 °C. The effect of preillumination is not observed in the presence of 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea.

A model is discussed for the reaction center, with two electron donors, cytochrome b₅₅₉ and Z, acting in competition. Their respective efficiency is dependent on temperature and on their states of oxidation. The specific effect of flash excitation is attributed to a two-photon reaction, possibly based on energy-trapping properties of the oxidized trap chlorophyll.     

Kinetics of reduction of the oxidized primary electron donor of Photosystem II in spinach chloroplasts and in Chlorella cells in the microsecond and nanosecond time ranges following flash excitation

Absorption changes (ΔA) at 820 nm, following laser flash excitation of spinach chloroplasts and Chlorella cells, were studied in order to obtain information on the reduction time of the photooxidized primary donor of Photosystem II at physiological temperatures.In the microsecond time range the difference spectrum of ΔA between 750 and 900 nm represents a peak at 820 nm, attributable to a radical-cation of chlorophyll a. In untreated dark-adapted material the signal can be attributed solely to P⁺?700; it decays in a polyphasic manner with half-times of 17 μs, 210 μs and over 1 ms. The oxidized primary donor of Photosystem II (P⁺_II) is not detected with a time resolution of 3 μs. After treatment with 3–10 mM hydroxylamine, which inhibits the donor side of Photosystem II, P⁺_II is observed and decays biphasically (a major phase with $\text{t}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{= 20–40 μ}\text{s}$, and a minor phase with $\text{t}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{? 200 μ}\text{s}$), probably by reduction by an accessory electron donor.In the nanosecond range, which was made accessible by a new fast-response flash photometer operating at 820 nm, it was found the P⁺_II is reduced with a half-time of 25–45 ns in untreated dark-adapted chloroplasts. It is assumed that the normal secondary electron donor is responsible for this fast reduction.     

The back reaction in the primary electron transfer couple of photosystem II of photosynthesis

Changes of C-550, cytochrome b₅₅₉ and fluorescence yield induced in chloroplasts by single saturating flashes were studied at low temperature. A single saturating flash at −196°C was quite ineffective in reducing C-550, oxidizing cytochrome b₅₅₉ or increasing the fluorescence yield, presumably because most of the charge separation induced by the flash was dissipated by a direct back reaction in the primary electron transfer couple. The back reaction, which competes with the dark reduction of the oxidized primary electron donor by a secondary electron donor, becomes increasingly important as the temperature is lowered because of the temperature coefficient of the reaction with the secondary donor. The effect of the back reaction is to lower the quantum yield for the production of stable photochemical products by steady irradiation. Assuming a quantum yield of unity for the photoreduction of C-550 at room temperature, the quantum yield for the reaction is about 0.40 at −100°C and 0.27 at −196°C.     

Evidence for a double hit process in Photosystem II based on fluorescence studies

1. The amplitudes of the fast (0–20 μs) and slow (20 μs–2 ms) fluorescence rise induced by a 2 μs flash have been measured as a function of the energy of the flash in chloroplasts inhibited by 3(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea. The saturation curve for the slow rise shows a characteristic lag which is not observed for the fast fluorescence rise. This lag indicates that Photosystem II centers undergo a double hit process which implies that (a), each photocenter includes two acceptors Q₁ and Q₂; (b), after the first hit, oxidized chlorophyll Chl⁺ is reduced by a secondary acceptor Y in a time short compared to the duration of the flash; (c), after the second hit, Chl⁺ is reduced by another secondary donor, D.

2. According to Den Haan et al. ((1974) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 368, 409–421), hydroxylamine destroys the secondary donor responsible for the fast reduction of Chl⁺. In the presence of 3 mM hydroxylamine, only the secondary donor D is functional and a flash induces mainly a single hit process.

3. The saturation curves for the fast and the slow rises have been studied in the presence of 3(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea for a second actinic flash given 2.5 s after a first saturating one. The large decrease in the half-saturating energy indicates the existence of efficient energy transfer occuring between photosynthetic units.

4. Two alternate hypotheses are discussed (a) in which D is an auxiliary donor and (b) in which D is included in the main electron transfer chain.     

The role of chloride ion in Photosystem II I. Effects of chloride ion on Photosystem II electron transport and on hydroxylamine inhibition

1. Chloroplasts washed with Cl^?-free, low-salt media (pH 8) containing EDTA, show virtually no DCMU-insensitive silicomolybdate reduction. The activity is readily restored when 10 mM Cl^? is added to the reaction mixture. Very similar results were obtained with the other Photosystem II electron acceptor 2,5-dimethylquinone (with dibromothymoquinone), with the Photosystem I electron acceptor FMN, and also with ferricyanide which accepts electrons from both photosystems.2. Strong Cl^?-dependence of Hill activity was observed invariably at all pH values tested (5.5–8.3) and in chloroplasts from three different plants: spinach, tobacco and corn (mesophyll).3. In the absence of added Cl^? the functionally Cl^?-depleted chloroplasts are able to oxidize, through Photosystem II, artificial reductants such as catechol, diphenylcarbazide, ascorbate and H₂O₂ at rates which are 4–12 times faster than the rate of the residual Hill reaction.4. The Cl^?-concentration dependence of Hill activity with dimethylquinone as an electron acceptor is kinetically consistent with the typical enzyme activation mechanism: E(inactive) + Cl^?ag E · Cl^? (active), and the apparent activation constant (0.9 mM at pH 7.2) is unchanged by chloroplast fragmentation.5. The initial phase of the development of inhibition of water oxidation in Cl^?-depleted chloroplasts during the dark incubation with NH₂OH ($\text{1}\text{2}$ H₂SO₄) is 5 times slower when the incubation medium contains Cl^? than when the medium contains NH₂OH alone or NH₂OH plus acetate ion. (Acetate is shown to be ineffective in stimulating O₂ evolution.)6. We conclude that the Cl^?-requiring step is one which is specifically associated with the water-splitting reaction, and suggests that Cl^? probably acts as a cofactor (ligand) of the NH₂OH-sensitive, Mn-containing O₂-evolving enzyme.     

Primary reactions of Photosystem II at low pH. 2. Light-induced changes of absorbance and electron spin resonance in spinach chloroplasts

The effects of lowering the pH on Photosystem II have been studied by measuring changes in absorbance and electron spin resonance in spinach chloroplasts.At pH values around 4 a light-induced dark-reversible chlorophyll oxidation by Photosystem II was observed. This chlorophyll is presumably the primary electron donor of system II. At pH values between 5 and 4 steady state illumination induced an ESR signal, similar in shape and amplitude to signal II, which was rapidly reversed in the dark. This may reflect the accumulation of the oxidized secondary donor upon inhibition of oxygen evolution. Near pH 4 the rapidly reversible signal and the stable and slowly decaying components of signal II disappeared irreversibly concomitant with the release of bound manganese.The results are discussed in relation to the effects of low pH on prompt and delayed fluorescence reported earlier (van Gorkom, H. J., Pulles, M. P. J., Haveman, J. and den Haan, G. A. (1976) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 423, 217–226).     

The rapid component of electron paramagnetic resonance signal II: A candidate for the physiological donor to Photosystem II in spinach chloroplasts

Rapid light-induced transients in EPR Signal IIf (F^?+) are observed in 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU)-treated, Tris-washed chloroplasts until the state F P680 Q^? is reached. In the absence of exogenous redox mediators several flashes are required to saturate this photoinactive state. However, the Signal IIf transient is observed on only the first flash following DCMU addition if an efficient donor to Signal IIf, phenylenediamine or hydroquinone, is present. Complementary polarographic measurements show that under these conditions oxidized phenylenediamine is produced only on the first flash of a series. The DCMU inhibition of Signal IIf can be completely relieved by oxidative titration of a one-electron reductant with E′_08.0 = +480 mV. At high reduction potentials the decay time of Signal IIf is constant at about 300 ms, whereas in the absence of DCMU the decay time is longer and increases with increasing reduction potential.A model is proposed in which Q^?, the reduced Photosystem II primary acceptor, and D, a one-electron 480 mV donor endogenous to the chloroplast suspension, compete in the reduction of Signal IIf (F^?+). At high potentials D is oxidized in the dark, and the (Q^? + F^?+) back reaction regenerates the photoactive F P680 Q state. The electrochemical and kinetic evidence is consistent with the hypothesis that the Signal IIf species, F, is identical with Z, the physiological donor to P680.     

Effects of carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone and hydroxylamine on the Photosystem II electron exchange mechanism in 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea treated algae and chloroplasts

The effects of NH₂OH and carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP) on 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU)-treated algae and chloroplasts were studied. In the presence of DCMU, the photochemically separated charges can only disappear through a recombination back reaction; both substances induce an irreversible reduction of the donor side and after sufficient illumination their action in the presence of DCMU leads to the formation of a permanent fluorescent state.

In the DCMU + CCCP system, a fast fluorescence induction curve is observed. The fluorescence yield is brought to its maximum by two flashes. The luminescence emission is strongly inhibited and most centers reach their permanent fluorescent state after one flash.

In the DCMU + NH₂OH system, a slow fluorescence rise is observed and several saturating flashes are needed for the fluorescence yield to reach its maximum. The exhaustion of the NH₂OH oxidizing capacity and the complete transformation to a permanent fluorescent state also require a large number of flashes.

The reduction pathway catalyzed by CCCP appears to be a good competitor to the back reaction, while NH₂OH seems to be a relatively inefficient donor.

In addition the action of NH₂OH and CCCP on fluorescence suggests that the donor side influences the quenching properties of Photosystem II centers. A possible mechanism is proposed.     

The existence of a high photochemical turnover rate at the reaction centers of System II in Tris-washed chloroplasts

In Tris-washed chloroplasts the kinetics of the primary electron acceptor X 320 of reaction center II has been investigated by fast repetitive flash spectroscopy with a time resolution of $\text{≈ 1 μs}$. It has been found that X 320 is reduced by a flash in $\text{? 1 μs}$. The subsequent reoxidation in the dark occurs mainly by a reaction with a 100–200 μs kinetics. The light-induced difference spectrum confirms X 320 to be the reactive species. From these results it is concluded that in Tris-washed chloroplasts the reaction centers of System II are characterized by a high photochemical turnover rate mediated either via rapid direct charge recombination or via fast cyclic electron flow.     

Interaction of oxidized and reduced N-methylphenazonium methosulfate (PMS) with Photosystem II

In 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU) poisoned chloroplasts, the restoration of the fluorescence induction is presumed to be due to a back reaction of the reduced primary acceptor (Q⁻) and the oxidized primary donor (Z⁺) of Photosystem II. Carbonylcyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP) is known to inhibit this back reaction. The influence of reduced N-methylphenazonium methosulfate (PMS) in the absence of CCCP and of oxidized PMS in the presence of CCCP on the back reaction was investigated and the following results were obtained:

1. (1) Reduced PMS at the concentration of 1 μM inhibits the back reaction as effectively as hydroxylamine, suggesting an electron donating function of reduced PMS for System II.

2. (2) The inhibition of the back reaction by CCCP is regenerated to a high degree by oxidized PMS which led to assume a cyclic System II electron flow catalysed by PMS.

3. (3) At concentrations of reduced PMS higher than 1 μM it is shown that both the fast initial emission and more significantly the variable emission are quenched.

Electron transport and photophosphorylation in chloroplasts as a function of the electron acceptor. III. A dibromothymoquinone-insensitive phosphorylation reaction associated with Photosystem II

Dibromothymoquinone (2,5-dibromo-3-methyl-6-isopropyl-p-benzoquinone) is reputed to be a plastoquinone antagonist which prevents the photoreduction of hydrophilic oxidants such as ferredoxin-NADP⁺. However, we have found that dibromothymoquinone inhibits only a small part of the photoreduction of lipophilic oxidants such as oxidized p-phenylenediamine. Dibromothymoquinone-resistant photoreduction reactions are coupled to phosphorylation, about 0.4 molecules of ATP consistently being formed for every pair of electrons transported. Dibromothymoquinone itself is a lipophilic oxidant which can be photoreduced by chloroplasts, then reoxidized by ferricyanide or oxygen. The electron transport thus catalysed also supports phosphorylation and the $\text{P}\text{e}{}_2$ ratio is again 0.4. It is concluded that there is a site of phosphorylation before the dibromothymoquinone block and another site of phosphorylation after the block. The former site must be associated with electron transfer reactions near Photosystem II, while the latter site is presumably associated with the transfer of electrons from plastoquinone to cytochrome f.     

pH dependent changes in the reactivity of the primary electron acceptor of System II in spinach chloroplasts to external oxidant and reductant

Changes in the rates of dark oxidation and reduction of the primary electron acceptor of System II by added oxidant and reductant were investigated by measuring the induction of chlorophyll fluorescence under moderate actinic light in 3-(3′,4′-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea-inhibited chloroplasts at pH values between 3.6 and 9.5. It was found that:

1. (1) The rate of dark oxidation of photoreduced primary acceptor was very slow at all the pH values tested without added electron acceptor.

2. (2) The rate was accelerated by the addition of ferricyanide in the whole pH range. It was dependent approximately on the 0.8th power of the ferricyanide concentration.

3. (3) The rate constant for the oxidation of the primary acceptor by ferricyanide was pH-dependent and became high at low pH. The value at pH 3.6 was more than 100 times that at pH 7.8.

4. (4) The pH-dependent change in the rate constant was almost reversible when the chloroplasts were suspended at the original pH after a large pH change (acid treatment).

5. (5) An addition of carbonylcyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone or heavy metal chelators had little effect on the rate of dark oxidation of the primary acceptor by ferricyanide.

6. (6) The dark reduction of the primary acceptor by sodium dithionite also became faster at low pH.

From these results it is concluded that at low pH the primary acceptor of System II becomes accessible to the added hydrophilic reagents even in the presence of 3-(3′,4′-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea.     

A rapid,light-induced transient in electron paramagnetic resonance signal II activated upon inhibition of photosynthetic oxygen evolution

A rapid, light-induced reversible component in Signal II is observed upon inhibition of oxygen evolution in broken spinach chloroplasts. The inhibitory treatments used include Tris washing, heat, treatment with chaotropic agents, and aging. This new Signal II component is in a 1 : 1 ratio with Signal I (P700). Its formation corresponds to a light-induced oxidation which occurs in less than 500 μs. The subsequent decay of the radical results from a reduction which occurs more rapidly as the reduction potential of the chloroplast suspension is decreased. The formation of this free radical component is complete following a single 10-μs flash, and it occurs with a quantum efficiency similar to that observed for Signal I formation. Red light is more effective than far-red light in the generation of this species, and, in preilluminated chloroplasts, 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea blocks its formation. Inhibition studies show that the decline in oxygen evolution parallels the activation of this Signal II component.These results are interpreted in terms of a model in which two pathways, one involving water, the other involving the rapid Signal II component, compete for oxidizing equivalents generated by Photosystem II. In broken chloroplasts this Signal II pathway is deactivated and water is the principal electron donor. However, upon inhibition of oxygen evolution, the Signal II pathway is activated.     

A one microsecond component of chlorophyll luminescence suggesting a primary acceptor of system II of photosynthesis different from Q

The kinetics of the luminescence of chlorophyll a in Chlorella vulgaris were studied in the time range from 0.2 μs to 20 μs after a short saturating flash ($\text{t}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{= 25}\text{ns}$) under various pretreatment including anaerobiosis, flashes, continuous illumination and various additions. A 1 μs luminescence component probably originating from System II was found of which the relative amplitude was maximum under anaerobic conditions for reaction centers in the state SPQ^? before the flash, about one third for centers in the state S⁺PQ^? or SPQ before the flash, and about one tenth for centers in the state S⁺PQ before the flash. S is the secondary donor complex with zero charge; S⁺ is the secondary donor complex with 1 to 3 positive charges; P, the primary donor, is the photoactive chlorophyll a, P-680, of reaction center 2; Q^? is the reduced acceptor of System II, Q. Under aerobic conditions, where an endogenous quencher presumably was active, the luminescence was reduced by a factor two.The 1 μs decay of the luminescence is probably caused by the disappearance of P⁺ formed in the laser flash according to the reaction ZP⁺ → Z⁺P in which Z is the molecule which donates an electron to P⁺ and which is part of S. After addition of hydroxylamine, the 1 μs luminescence component changed with the incubation time exponentially (τ = 27 s) into a 30 μs component; during the same time, the variable fluorescence yield, measured 9 μs after the laser flash, decreased by a factor 2 with the same time constant. Hereafter in a second much slower phase the fluorescence yield decreased as an exponential function of the incubation time to about the dark value; meanwhile the 30 μs luminescence increased about 50% with the same time constant (τ = 7 min). Heat treatment abolished both luminescence components.The 1 μs luminescence component saturated at about the same energy as the System II fluorescence yield 60 μs after the laser flash and as the slower luminescence components. From the observation that the amplitude is maximum if the laser flash is given when the fluorescence yield is high after prolonged anaerobic conditions (state SQ^?), we conclude that the 1 μs luminescence is probably caused by the reaction

$\text{PWQ}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{+hv →}\text{P}\text{1}\text{WQ}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{→}\text{P}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{W}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{Q}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{→}\text{P}\text{1}\text{WQ}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{→ PWQ}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{+hv}$

in which W is an acceptor different from Q. The presence of S⁺ reduced the luminescence amplitude to about one third. Two models are discussed, one with W as an intermediate between P and Q and another, which gives the best interpretation, with W on a side path.