Stomatal responses to humidity and temperature in darkness

Stomatal responses to leaf temperature (T_l) and to the mole fractions of water vapour in the ambient air (w_a) and the leaf intercellular air spaces (w_i) were determined in darkness to remove the potential effects of changes in photosynthesis and intercellular CO₂ concentration. Both the steady‐state and kinetic responses of stomatal conductance (g_s) to w_a in darkness were found to be indistinguishable from those in the light. g_s showed a steep response to the difference (Δw) between w_a and w_i when w_a was varied. The response was much less steep when w_i was varied. Although stomatal apertures responded steeply to T_l when Δw was held constant at 17 mmol mol^?1, the response was much less steep when Δw was held constant at about zero. Similar results were obtained in the light for Δw = 15 mmol mol^?1 and Δw ≈ 0 mmol mol^?1. These results are discussed in the context of mechanisms for the stomatal response to humidity.     

A new, vapour-phase mechanism for stomatal responses to humidity and temperature

A new mechanism for stomatal responses to humidity and temperature is proposed. Unlike previously-proposed mechanisms, which rely on liquid water transport to create water potential gradients within the leaf, the new mechanism assumes that water transport to the guard cells is primarily through the vapour phase. Under steady-state conditions, guard cells are assumed to be in near-equilibrium with the water vapour in the air near the bottom of the stomatal pore. As the water potential of this air varies with changing air humidity and leaf temperature, the resultant changes in guard cell water potential produce stomatal movements. A simple, closed-form, mathematical model based on this idea is derived. The new model is parameterized for a previously published set of data and is shown to fit the data as well as or better than existing models. The model contains mathematical elements that are consistent with previously-proposed mechanistic models based on liquid flow as well as empirical models based on relative humidity. As such, it provides a mechanistic explanation for the realm of validity for each of these approaches.     

Stomatal responses to humidity in air and helox

Abstract. Stomatal responses to humidity were studied in several species using normal air and a helium: oxygen mixture (79:21 v/v, with CO₂ and water vapour added), which we termed 'helox'. Since water vapour diffuses 2.33 times faster in helox than in air, it was possible to vary the water-vapour concentration difference between the leaf and the air at the leaf surface independently of the transpiration rate and vice versa. The CO₂ concentration at the evaporating surfaces ( c_i ), leaf temperature and photon flux density were kept constant throughout the experiments. The results of these experiments were consistent with a mechanism for Stomatal responses to humidity that is based on the rate of water loss from the leaf. Stomata apparently did not directly sense and respond to either the water vapour concentration at the leaf surface or the difference in water vapour concentration between the leaf interior and the leaf surface. In addition, stomatal responses that caused reductions in transpiration rate at low humidities were accompanied by decreases in photosynthesis at constant c_i , suggesting heterogeneous (patchy) stomatal closure.     

A reinterpretation of stomatal responses to humidity

The stomatal conductance (g) for single leaves and the equivalent canopy conductance for stands of vegetation are often represented in models as empirical functions of saturation vapour pressure deficit or relative humidity. The mechanistic basis of this dependence is very weak. A reanalysis of 52 sets of measurements on 16 species supports the conclusion of Mott & Parkhurst (1991, Plant, Cell and Environment 14, 509–515) that stomata respond to the rate of transpiration (E) rather than to humidity per se. In general, ?g/?E is negative and constant so that the relation between g and E can be defined by two parameters: a maximum conductance g_m obtained by extrapolation to zero transpiration, and a maximum rate of transpiration E_m obtained by extrapolation to zero conductance. Both parameters are shown to be functions of temperature, CO₂ concentration, and soil water content. Exceptionally, transpiration rate and conductance may decrease together in very dry air, possibly because of patchy closure of stomata.     

The role of the mesophyll in stomatal responses to light and CO2

Stomatal responses to light and CO₂ were investigated using isolated epidermes of Tradescantia pallida , Vicia faba and Pisum sativum . Stomata in leaves of T. pallida and P. sativum responded to light and CO₂, but those from V. faba did not. Stomata in isolated epidermes of all three species could be opened on KCl solutions, but they showed no response to light or CO₂. However, when isolated epidermes of T. pallida and P. sativum were placed on an exposed mesophyll from a leaf of the same species or a different species, they regained responsiveness to light and CO₂. Stomatal responses in these epidermes were similar to those in leaves in that they responded rapidly and reversibly to changes in light and CO₂. Epidermes from V. faba did not respond to light or CO₂ when placed on mesophyll from any of the three species. Experiments with single optic fibres suggest that stomata were being regulated via signals from the mesophyll produced in response to light and CO₂ rather than being sensitized to light and CO₂ by the mesophyll. The data suggest that most of the stomatal response to CO₂ and light occurs in response to a signal generated by the mesophyll.     

Interactions among stomata in response to perturbations in humidity

The existence of patchy stomatal closure suggests interactions among neighbouring stomata that synchronize stomatal movements in small areas of a leaf. To test for such interactions, water vapour partial pressure (e_wv) for a small group of stomata was controlled independently of that for the surrounding stomata using gas flow from a small needle. The e_wv for the surrounding stomata was controlled with a larger gas flow, termed the primary flow. The spatial pattern of e_wv isobars caused by the needle flow was assessed experimentally and theoretically. Stomatal apertures were monitored following perturbations in e_wv of the primary flow and the needle flow. When e_wv of the primary flow was perturbed and that of the needle flow held constant, stomata for which there was little or no perturbation in e_wv responded similarly to stomata experiencing the perturbation. When the e_wv of the needle flow was perturbed and that of the primary flow held constant, many stomata experiencing little or no perturbation responded similarly to those experiencing a large perturbation. The results are discussed in relation to a mechanism for stomatal interactions that has been proposed in a previous study [Haefner, Buckley & Mott (1997) Plant, Cell and Environment 20, 1087–1097, this issue].     

Opinion: Stomatal responses to light and CO2 depend on the mesophyll

The mechanisms by which stomata respond to red light and CO₂ are unknown, but much of the current literature assumes that these mechanisms reside wholly within the guard cells. However, responses of guard cells in isolated epidermes are typically much smaller than those in leaves, and there are several lines of evidence in the literature suggesting that the mesophyll is necessary for these responses in leaves. This paper advances the opinion that although guard cells may have small direct responses to red light and CO₂, most of the stomatal response to these factors in leaves is caused by an unknown signal that originates in the mesophyll.     

Stomatal and hydraulic conductance in growing sugarcane: stomatal adjustment to water transport capacity*

Abstract Stomatal conductance per unit leaf area in well-irrigated field- and greenhouse-grown sugarcane increased with leaf area up to 0.2 m² plant ¹, then declined so that maximum transpiration per plant tended to saturate rather than increase linearly with further increase in leaf area. Conductance to liquid water transport exhibited parallel changes with plant size. This coordiantion of vapour phase and liquid phase conductances resulted in a balance between water loss and water transport capacity, maintaining leaf water status remarkably constant over a wide range of plant size and growing conditions. The changes in stomatal conductance were not related to plant or leaf age. Partial defoliation caused rapid increases in stomatal conductance, to re-establish the original relationship with remaining leaf area. Similarly, pruning of roots caused rapid reductions in stomatal conductance, which maintained or improved leaf water status. These results suggest that sugarcane stomata adjusted to the ratio of total hydraulic conductance to total transpiring leaf area. This could be mediated by root metabolites in the transpiration stream, whose delivery per unit leaf area would be a function of the relative magnitudes of root system size, transpiration rate and leaf area.     

Testing a vapour‐phase model of stomatal responses to humidity

This study tests two predictions from a recently proposed model for stomatal responses to humidity and temperature. The model is based on water potential equilibrium between the guard cells and the air at the bottom of the stomatal pore and contains three independent variables: g_s⁰, Z and Θ. g_s⁰ is the value of stomatal conductance that would occur at saturating humidity and will vary among leaves and with CO₂ and light. The value of Z is determined primarily by the resistance to heat transfer from the epidermis to the evaporating site and the value of Θ is determined primarily by the resistance to water vapour diffusion from the evaporating site to the guard cells. This leads to the two predictions that were tested. Firstly, the values of Z and Θ should be constant for leaves of a given species grown under given conditions, although g_s⁰ should vary among leaves and with light and CO₂. And secondly, the ratio of Z to Θ should be higher in leaves having their stomata in crypts because the distance for heat transfer is greater than that for water vapour diffusion. Data from three species, Nerium oleander, Pastinaca sativum and Xanthium strumarium support these two predictions.     

Stomatal responses to CO2 during a diel Crassulacean acid metabolism cycle in Kalanchoe daigremontiana and Kalanchoe pinnata

To investigate the diurnal variation of stomatal sensitivity to CO₂, stomatal response to a 30 min pulse of low CO₂ was measured four times during a 24 h time-course in two Crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) species Kalanchoe daigremontiana and Kalanchoe pinnata , which vary in the degree of succulence, and hence, expression and commitment to CAM. In both species, stomata opened in response to a reduction in p CO₂ in the dark and in the latter half of the light period, and thus in CAM species, chloroplast photosynthesis is not required for the stomatal response to low p CO₂. Stomata did not respond to a decreased p CO₂ in K. daigremontiana in the light when stomata were closed, even when the supply of internal CO₂ was experimentally reduced. We conclude that stomatal closure during phase III is not solely mediated by high internal p CO₂, and suggest that in CAM species the diurnal variability in the responsiveness of stomata to p CO₂ could be explained by hypothesizing the existence of a single CO₂ sensor which interacts with other signalling pathways. When not perturbed by low p CO₂, CO₂ assimilation rate and stomatal conductance were correlated both in the light and in the dark in both species.     

The role of epidermal turgor in stomatal interactions following a local perturbation in humidity

Humidity in a small area of a Vicia faba L. leaf was perturbed with a flow of dry air from an 80 µm (inside diameter) needle, while the remainder of the leaf was maintained at high and constant humidity. The influence of the needle flow on the humidity at the leaf surface was quantified by using a spatially explicit dewpoint hygrometer to observe condensation patterns. When the dry air from a needle was applied to the leaf, stomata within the influence of the needle opened within the first few minutes of the perturbation, and local epidermal turgor pressure declined within the same time frame. When the needle flow was removed from the leaf, these responses were reversed, but with more variable kinetics. Stomata and epidermal cells outside the influence of the needle flow, which were exposed to a constant and high humidity, showed similar, but smaller, responses when the needle flow was applied to the leaf. Since the opening of these stomata should have had only a small effect on transpiration (because of the high humidity), it is likely that the reduction in epidermal turgor was the cause (rather than the result) of the stomatal opening. The magnitude of the turgor response was only loosely related to the distance from the needle flow up to distances of almost 400 µm. The data support the idea that neighbouring stomata can interact through the influence of transpiration on epidermal turgor.     

不同甘蔗品种叶片气孔对水分胁迫的响应

干旱是甘蔗面临最主要的环境胁迫之一,为了解不同甘蔗品种在干旱胁迫时的气孔响应,该研究以F172、GT21、YT93/159和 YL6四个抗旱性有显著差异的甘蔗品种为材料,采用桶栽,在伸长期进行四种不同程度的干旱胁迫(不浇水)处理：土壤持水量在①65％~70％为轻度干旱;②45％~50％为中度干旱;③25％~30％为重度干旱;④以土壤含水量为75％为对照(CK).检测不同品种不同处理甘蔗的叶片相对持水量变化,并利用扫描电镜技术观察甘蔗叶片下表皮气孔特性.结果表明：在干旱胁迫下,四个甘蔗品种叶片气孔导度急剧下降,重度干旱时耐旱性强的 F172和 GT21的气孔导度低于耐旱性弱的 YT93/159和 YL6的;复水后3 d,F172和 GT21的气孔导度上升至82．07和88．85 mmol·m-2·s-1,而 YT93/159和 YL6的仅有18．88和33．08 mmol·m-2·s-1.干旱还导致气孔下陷、闭合,气孔器的长、宽明显减小,且品种间气孔器长度变化差异显著;干旱胁迫下气孔密度增大,尤以耐旱性最强的 F172在重度干旱时达到显著差异.重度干旱时 F172与GT21的气孔闭合百分比是 YT93/159和 YL6近3~4倍.在水分胁迫下,叶片相对含水量降低,但 F172和GT21在重度干旱时仍可以保持相对较高的含水量,其它两个品种相对较低,尤以 YT93/159的最低.在复水后叶片含水量都有所恢复.这些研究结果表明不同甘蔗品种抗旱能力与叶片气孔特性和含水量密切相关.     

Stomatal response to humidity and CO2 implicated in recent decline in US evaporation

Evapotranspiration, defined as the total flux of water from the land surface to the atmosphere, is a major component of the hydrologic cycle and surface energy balance. Although evapotranspiration is expected to intensify with increasing temperatures, long‐term, regional trends in evapotranspiration remain uncertain due to spatially and temporally limited direct measurements. In this study, we utilize an emergent relation between the land surface and atmospheric boundary layer to infer daily evapotranspiration from historical meteorological data collected at 236 weather stations across the United States. Our results suggest a statistically significant (α = 0.05) decrease in evapotranspiration of approximately 6% from 1961 to 2014, with a significant (α = 0.05) sharp decline of 13% from 1998 to 2014. We attribute the decrease in evapotranspiration mostly to declines in surface conductance, but also to offsetting changes in longwave radiation, wind speed, and incoming solar radiation. Using an established stomatal conductance model, we explain the changes in inferred surface conductance as a response to increases in carbon dioxide and, more recently, to an abrupt decrease in atmospheric humidity.     

Stomatal and photosynthetic responses to variable sunlight

Most plants experience many fluctuations in sunlight from full sun to shade throughout the day. Under these conditions, stomatal and photosynthetic responses vary dramatically among species depending on water status and growth form. Many herbaceous, fast-growing species rapidly reduce stomatal opening during short-term shade periods. Rapid stomatal closure during shade conserves water, but may also reduce CO₂ uptake. Because periods of alternating sun and shade can reduce accumulative water stress that would otherwise severely curtail carbon gain, some herbs are restricted to habitats with intermittent periods of shade. In contrast to herbaceous growth forms, woody species maintain relatively constant stomatal opening during both sun and shade periods. This results in greater CO₂ uptake, but with greater water loss. These two generalized response patterns for woody and herbaceous species to natural variations in sunlight conflict with conventional ideas of water use and carbon gain based on measurements made under constant light.     

Specialized stomatal humidity responses underpin ecological diversity in C3 bromeliads

The Neotropical Bromeliaceae display an extraordinary level of ecological variety, with species differing widely in habit, photosynthetic pathway and growth form. Divergences in stomatal structure and function, hitherto understudied in treatments of bromeliad evolutionary physiology, could have been critical to the generation of variety in ecophysiological strategies among the bromeliads. Because humidity is a key factor in bromeliad niches, we focussed on stomatal responses to vapour pressure deficit (VPD). We measured the sensitivity of stomatal conductance and assimilation rate to VPD in eight C₃ bromeliad species of contrasting growth forms and ecophysiological strategies and parameterised the kinetics of stomatal responses to a step change in VPD. Notably, three tank‐epiphyte species displayed low conductance, high sensitivity and fast kinetics relative to the lithophytes, while three xeromorphic terrestrial species showed high conductance and sensitivity but slow stomatal kinetics. An apparent feedforward response of transpiration to VPD occurred in the tank epiphytes, while water‐use efficiency was differentially impacted by stomatal closure depending on photosynthetic responses. Differences in stomatal responses to VPD between species of different ecophysiological strategies are closely linked to modifications of stomatal morphology, which we argue has been a pivotal component of the evolution of high diversity in this important plant family.     

Stomatal responses to changes in vapor pressure deficit reflect tissue‐specific differences in hydraulic conductance

The vapor pressure deficit (D) of the atmosphere can negatively affect plant growth as plants reduce stomatal conductance to water vapor (g_wv) in response to increasing D, limiting the ability of plants to assimilate carbon. The sensitivity of g_wv to changes in D varies among species and has been correlated with the hydraulic conductance of leaves (K_leaf), but the hydraulic conductance of other tissues has also been implicated in plant responses to changing D. Among the 19 grass species, we found that K_leaf was correlated with the hydraulic conductance of large longitudinal veins (K_lv, r² = 0.81), but was not related to K_root (r² = 0.01). Stomatal sensitivity to D was correlated with K_leaf relative to total leaf area (r² = 0.50), and did not differ between C₃ and C₄ species. Transpiration (E) increased in response to D, but 8 of the 19 plants showed a decline in E at high D, indicative of an ‘apparent feedforward’ response. For these individuals, E began to decline at lower values of D in plants with low K_root (r² = 0.72). These results show the significance of both leaf and root hydraulic conductance as drivers of plant responses to evaporative demand.     

Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis vary linearly with plant hydraulic conductance in ponderosa pine

Recent work has shown that stomatal conductance (g_s) and assimilation (A) are responsive to changes in the hydraulic conductance of the soil to leaf pathway (K_L), but no study has quantitatively described this relationship under controlled conditions where steady‐state flow is promoted. Under steady‐state conditions, the relationship between g_s, water potential (Ψ) and K_L can be assumed to follow the Ohm's law analogy for fluid flow. When boundary layer conductance is large relative to g_s, the Ohm's law analogy leads to g_s = K_L (Ψ_soil?Ψ_leaf)/D, where D is the vapour pressure deficit. Consequently, if stomata regulate Ψ_leaf and limit A, a reduction in K_L will cause g_s and A to decline. We evaluated the regulation of Ψ_leaf and A in response to changes in K_L in well‐watered ponderosa pine seedlings (Pinus ponderosa). To vary K_L, we systematically reduced stem hydraulic conductivity (k) using an air injection technique to induce cavitation while simultaneously measuring Ψ_leaf and canopy gas exchange in the laboratory under constant light and D. Short‐statured seedlings (< 1 m tall) and hour‐long equilibration times promoted steady‐state flow conditions. We found that Ψ_leaf remained constant near ? 1·5 MPa except at the extreme 99% reduction of k when Ψ_leaf fell to ? 2·1 MPa. Transpiration, g_s, A and K_L all declined with decreasing k (P < 0·001). As a result of the near homeostasis in bulk Ψ_leaf, g_s and A were directly proportional to K_L (R² > 0·90), indicating that changes in K_L may affect plant carbon gain.     

Stomatal acclimation to vapour pressure deficit doubles transpiration of small tree seedlings with warming

Future climate change is expected to increase temperature (T) and atmospheric vapour pressure deficit (VPD) in many regions, but the effect of persistent warming on plant stomatal behaviour is highly uncertain. We investigated the effect of experimental warming of 1.9–5.1 °C and increased VPD of 0.5–1.3 kPa on transpiration and stomatal conductance (g_s) of tree seedlings in the temperate forest understory (Duke Forest, North Carolina, USA). We observed peaked responses of transpiration to VPD in all seedlings, and the optimum VPD for transpiration (D_opt) shifted proportionally with increasing chamber VPD. Warming increased mean water use of Carya by 140% and Quercus by 150%, but had no significant effect on water use of Acer. Increased water use of ring‐porous species was attributed to (1) higher air T and (2) stomatal acclimation to VPD resulting in higher g_s and more sensitive stomata, and thereby less efficient water use. Stomatal acclimation maintained homeostasis of leaf T and carbon gain despite increased VPD, revealing that short‐term stomatal responses to VPD may not be representative of long‐term exposure. Acclimation responses differ from expectations of decreasing g_s with increasing VPD and may necessitate revision of current models based on this assumption.     

Stomatal responses to changes in vapour pressure difference between leaf and air

We observed that stomata of Gossypium hirsutum, Glycine max and Xanthium strumarium respond to a change in vapour pressure difference between leaf and air at ambient partial pressures of CO₂ and below the CO₂ compensation point. Our report is at variance with a recent report (J. A. Bunce 1997, Plant, Cell and Environment 20, pp. 131–135) that stomatal sensitivity of leaves to a change in vapour pressure difference between leaf and air was eliminated when gas exchange measurements were made at near-zero carbon dioxide partial pressures (0–5 Pa).     

Stomatal sensing of the environment

The effects of environmental factors on stomatal behaviour are reviewed and the questions of whether photosynthesis and transpiration eontrol stomata or whether stomata themselves control the rates of these processes is addressed. Light affects stomata directly and indirectly. Light can act directly as an energy source resulting in ATP formation within guard cells via photophosphorylation, or as a stimulus as in the case of the blue light effects which cause guard cell H⁺ extrusion. Light also acts indirectly on stomata by affecting photosynthesis which influences the intercellular leaf CO₂ concentration ( C _i). Carbon dioxide concentrations in contact with the plasma membrane of the guard cell or within the guard cell acts directly on cell processes responsible for stomatal movements. The mechanism by which CO₂ exerts its effect is not fully understood but, at least in part, it is concerned with changing the properties of guard cell plasma membranes which influence ion transport processes. The C _i may remain fairly constant for much of the day for many species which is the result of parallel responses of stomata and photosynthesis to light. Leaf water potential also influences stomatal behaviour. Since leaf water potential is a resultant of water uptake and storage by the plant and transpirational water loss, any factor which affects these processes, such as soil water availability, temperature, atmospheric humidity and air movement, may indirectly affect stomata. Some of these factors, such as temperature and possibly humidity, may affect stomata directly. These direct and indirect effects of environmental factors interact to give a net opening response upon which is superimposed a direct effect of stomatal circadian rhythmic activity.