Noncanonical meiosis in the nematode <Emphasis Type="Italic">Caenorhabditis elegans</Emphasis> as a model for studying the molecular bases of the homologous chromosome synapsis,crossing over,and segregation

The nematode C. elegans is a classic study object of developmental biology and genetics, which is particularly suitable for studying the molecular bases of meiosis. Developing meiocytes are located in the threadlike gonads of C. elegans in linear gradient order of the stages of meiosis, which facilitates studying the order of intracellular events during meiosis. C. elegans has polycentric chromosomes. This causes a special order of events during meiosis, and as a consequence, meiosis in C. elegance differs from canonical meiosis of most eukaryotes. In the meiotic prophase I, all chromosomes carry single protein “pairing centers.” They are responsible for joining homologous chromosomes in pairs. This initiates the formation of synaptonemal complexes (SCs). Programmed double-stranded DNA breaks appear after initiation of the SC assembly, and they give rise to meiotic recombination. The initiation of meiotic recombination after the chromosome pairing distinguishes the C. elegans meiotic pattern from those in the absolute majority of eukaryotes studied. C. elegans has strict crossing over interference, which allows for the formation of one chiasma per bivalent. In the late prophase I, the polycentric centromeres are remodeled, one of the chromosome ends acquires a cuplike kinetochore, and during two meiotic divisions, chromosomes behave as monocentric. The study of meiosis in C. elegans allows for separate investigation of synapsis and recombination of homologous chromosomes and provides material for studying the evolution of meiosis.     

Strong nucleosomes reside in meiotic centromeres of C. elegans

Recently discovered strong nucleosomes (SNs) are characterized by strongly periodical DNA sequence, with visible rather than hidden sequence periodicity. In a quest for possible functions of the SNs, it has been found that the SNs concentrate within centromere regions of A. thaliana chromosomes . They, however, have been detected in Caenorhabditis elegans as well, although the holocentric chromosomes of this species do not have centromeres. Scrutinizing the SNs of C. elegans and their distributions along the DNA sequences of the chromosomes, we have discovered that the SNs are located mainly at the ends of the chromosomes of C. elegans. This suggests that, perhaps, the ends of the chromosomes fulfill some function(s) of centromeres in this species, as also indicated by the cytogenetic studies on meiotic chromosomes in spermatocytes of C. elegans, where the end-to-end association is observed. The centromeric involvement of the SNs, also found in A. thaliana, opens new horizons for the chromosome and centromere structure studies.     

Matefin/SUN-1 Phosphorylation Is Part of a Surveillance Mechanism to Coordinate Chromosome Synapsis and Recombination with Meiotic Progression and Chromosome Movement

Faithful chromosome segregation during meiosis I depends on the establishment of a crossover between homologous chromosomes. This requires induction of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), alignment of homologs, homolog association by synapsis, and repair of DSBs via homologous recombination. The success of these events requires coordination between chromosomal events and meiotic progression. The conserved SUN/KASH nuclear envelope bridge establishes transient linkages between chromosome ends and cytoskeletal forces during meiosis. In Caenorhabditis elegans, this bridge is essential for bringing homologs together and preventing nonhomologous synapsis. Chromosome movement takes place during synapsis and recombination. Concomitant with the onset of chromosome movement, SUN-1 clusters at chromosome ends associated with the nuclear envelope, and it is phosphorylated in a chk-2- and plk-2-dependent manner. Identification of all SUN-1 phosphomodifications at its nuclear N terminus allowed us to address their role in prophase I. Failures in recombination and synapsis led to persistent phosphorylations, which are required to elicit a delay in progression. Unfinished meiotic tasks elicited sustained recruitment of PLK-2 to chromosome ends in a SUN-1 phosphorylation–dependent manner that is required for continued chromosome movement and characteristic of a zygotene arrest. Furthermore, SUN-1 phosphorylation supported efficient synapsis. We propose that signals emanating from a failure to successfully finish meiotic tasks are integrated at the nuclear periphery to regulate chromosome end–led movement and meiotic progression. The single unsynapsed X chromosome in male meiosis is precluded from inducing a progression delay, and we found it was devoid of a population of phosphorylated SUN-1. This suggests that SUN-1 phosphorylation is critical to delaying meiosis in response to perturbed synapsis. SUN-1 may be an integral part of a checkpoint system to monitor establishment of the obligate crossover, inducible only in leptotene/zygotene. Unrepaired DSBs and unsynapsed chromosomes maintain this checkpoint, but a crossover intermediate is necessary to shut it down.     

Chromosome movement in meiosis I prophase of Caenorhabditis elegans

Rapid chromosome movement during prophase of the first meiotic division has been observed in many organisms. It is generally concomitant with formation of the “meiotic chromosome bouquet,” a special chromosome configuration in which one or both chromosome ends attach to the nuclear envelope and become concentrated within a limited area. The precise function of the chromosomal bouquet is still not fully understood. Chromosome mobility is implicated in homologous chromosome pairing, synaptonemal complex formation, recombination, and resolution of chromosome entanglements. The basic mechanistic module through which forces are exerted on chromosomes is widely conserved; however, phenotypic differences have been reported among various model organisms once movement is abrogated. Movements are transmitted to the chromosome ends by the nuclear membrane-bridging SUN/KASH complex and are dependent on cytoskeletal filaments and motor proteins located in the cytoplasm. Here we review the recent findings on chromosome mobility during meiosis in an animal model system: the Caenorhabditis elegans nematode.     

Meiotic chromosomes in motion: a perspective from Mus musculus and Caenorhabditis elegans

Vigorous chromosome movement during the extended prophase of the first meiotic division is conserved in most eukaryotes. The movement is crucial for the faithful segregation of homologous chromosomes into daughter cells, and thus for fertility. A prerequisite for meiotic chromosome movement is the stable and functional attachment of telomeres or chromosome ends to the nuclear envelope and their cytoplasmic coupling to the cytoskeletal forces responsible for generating movement. Important advances in understanding the components, mechanisms, and regulation of chromosome end attachment and movement have recently been made. This review focuses on insights gained from experiments into two major metazoan model organisms: the mouse, Mus musculus, and the nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans.

     

Structural Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC) Proteins Promote Homolog-Independent Recombination Repair in Meiosis Crucial for Germ Cell Genomic Stability

In meiosis, programmed DNA breaks repaired by homologous recombination (HR) can be processed into inter-homolog crossovers that promote the accurate segregation of chromosomes. In general, more programmed DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are formed than the number of inter-homolog crossovers, and the excess DSBs must be repaired to maintain genomic stability. Sister-chromatid (inter-sister) recombination is postulated to be important for the completion of meiotic DSB repair. However, this hypothesis is difficult to test because of limited experimental means to disrupt inter-sister and not inter-homolog HR in meiosis. We find that the conserved Structural Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC) 5 and 6 proteins in Caenorhabditis elegans are required for the successful completion of meiotic homologous recombination repair, yet they appeared to be dispensable for accurate chromosome segregation in meiosis. Mutations in the smc-5 and smc-6 genes induced chromosome fragments and dismorphology. Chromosome fragments associated with HR defects have only been reported in mutants, which have disrupted inter-homolog crossover. Surprisingly, the smc-5 and smc-6 mutations did not disrupt the formation of chiasmata, the cytologically visible linkages between homologous chromosomes formed from meiotic inter-homolog crossovers. The mutant fragmentation defect appeared to be preferentially enhanced by the disruptions of inter-homolog recombination but not by the disruptions of inter-sister recombination. Based on these findings, we propose that the C. elegans SMC-5/6 proteins are required in meiosis for the processing of homolog-independent, presumably sister-chromatid-mediated, recombination repair. Together, these results demonstrate that the successful completion of homolog-independent recombination is crucial for germ cell genomic stability.     

Cytological studies of the two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae Koch (Tetranychidae,trombidiformes). I: Meiosis in eggs

Meiosis in eggs of Tetranychus urticae Koch is described. The two maturation divisions result in (a) a haploid female pronucleus consisting of three karyomeres; — (b) a divided first polar body in which the chromosomes change into karyomeres; — (c) a second polar body, entering a new mitosis which is blocked in metaphase. Irradiation of adult females produced chromosome fragments in the meiotic divisions. The fragments behave as intact chromosomes which proves that during meiosis a diffuse kinetochore is present. The meiotic divisions show the cytologically characteristic features of an inverted meiosis. The presence of such a meiosis is corroborated by observations on eggs heterozygous for chromosome mutations. In both maturation divisions the chromosomes are orientated equatorially. It is suggested that the equatorial orientation is brought about by chiasmata having terminalized to both ends of the dyads. It is argued that in organisms with holokinetic chromosomes during meiosis an axial orientation of the bivalents does not necessarily imply a normal meiosis but can also imply an inverted meiosis.This work was carried out with financial aid of the Institute for Atomic Sciences in Agriculture and the Ministry of Public Health and Environment.     

Synapsis with and without recombination in the male meiosis of the leaf-footed bug <Emphasis Type="Italic">Holhymenia rubiginosa</Emphasis> (Coreidae,Heteroptera)

In organisms with chiasmatic meiosis two different relationships have been described between crossing over and synapsis: in one group of organisms synapsis depends on the initiation of meiotic recombination while in the other group it is independent of this initiation. These patterns have been observed mainly in organisms where all meiotic bivalents in the set have similar behaviors. In some heteropteran insects a pair of chromosomes named m chromosomes is known to behave differently from autosomes regarding synapsis and recombination. Here we used immunodetection of a synaptonemal complex component and acid-fixed squashes to investigate the conduct of the small m chromosome pair during the male meiosis in the coreid bug Holhymenia rubiginosa. We found that the m chromosomes form a synaptonemal complex during pachytene, but they are not attached by a chiasma in diakinesis. On the other hand, the autosomal bivalents synapse and recombine regularly. The co-existence of these variant chromosome behaviors during meiosis I add further evidence to the absence of unique patterns regarding the interdependence of synapsis and recombination.     

There are two mechanisms of achiasmate segregation in Drosophila females,one of which requires heterochromatic homology

There are numerous examples of the regular segregation of achiasmate chromosomes at meiosis I in Drosophila melanogaster females. Classically, the choice of achiasmate segregational partners has been thought to be independent of homology, but rather made on the basis of availability or similarities in size and shape. To the contrary, we show here that heterochromatic homology plays a primary role in ensuring the proper segregation of achiasmate homologs. We observe that the heterochromatin of chromosome 4 functions as, or contains, a meiotic pairing site. We show that free duplications carrying the 4th chromosome pericentric heterochromatin induce high frequencies of 4th chromosome nondisjunction regardless of their size. Moreover, a duplication from which some of the 4th chromosome heterochromatin has been removed is unable to induce 4th chromosome nondisjunction. Similarly, in the absence of either euchromatic homology or a size similarity, duplications bearing the X chromosome heterochromatin also disrupt the segregation of two achiasmate X chromosome centromeres. Although heterochromatic regions are sufficient to conjoin nonexchange homologues, we confirm that the segregation of heterologous chromosomes is determined by size, shape, and availability. The meiotic mutation Axs differentiates between these two processes of achiasmate centromere coorientation by disrupting only the homology-dependent mechanism. Thus there are two different mechanisms by which achiasmate segregational partners are chosen. We propose that the absence of diplotene-diakinesis during female meiosis allows heterochromatic pairings to persist until prometaphase and thus to co-orient homologous centromeres. We also propose that heterologous disjunctions result from a separate and homology-independent process that likely occurs during prometaphase. The latter process, which may not require the physical association of segregational partners, is similar to those observed in many insects, in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and in C. elegans males. We also suggest that the physical basis of this process may reflect known properties of the Drosophila meiotic spindle. © 1993 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

The condensin complexes play distinct roles to ensure normal chromosome morphogenesis during meiotic division in Arabidopsis

Meiosis is a specialized cell division essential for sexual reproduction. During meiosis the chromosomes are highly organized, and correct chromosome architecture is required for faithful segregation of chromosomes at anaphase I and II. Condensin is involved in chromosome organization during meiotic and mitotic cell divisions. Three condensin subunits, AtSMC4 and the condensin I and II specific subunits AtCAP‐D2 and AtCAP‐D3, respectively, have been studied for their role in meiosis. This has revealed that both the condensin I and condensin II complexes are required to maintain normal structural integrity of the meiotic chromosomes during the two nuclear divisions. Their roles appear functionally distinct in that condensin I is required to maintain normal compaction of the centromeric repeats and 45S rDNA, whereas loss of condensin II was associated with extensive interchromosome connections at metaphase I. Depletion of condensin is also associated with a slight reduction in crossover formation, suggesting a role during meiotic prophase I.     

Leagues of their own: sexually dimorphic features of meiotic prophase I

Meiosis is a conserved cell division process that is used by sexually reproducing organisms to generate haploid gametes. Males and females produce different end products of meiosis: eggs (females) and sperm (males). In addition, these unique end products demonstrate sex-specific differences that occur throughout meiosis to produce the final genetic material that is packaged into distinct gametes with unique extracellular morphologies and nuclear sizes. These sexually dimorphic features of meiosis include the meiotic chromosome architecture, in which both the lengths of the chromosomes and the requirement for specific meiotic axis proteins being different between the sexes. Moreover, these changes likely cause sex-specific changes in the recombination landscape with the sex that has the longer chromosomes usually obtaining more crossovers. Additionally, epigenetic regulation of meiosis may contribute to sexually dimorphic recombination landscapes. Here we explore the sexually dimorphic features of both the chromosome axis and crossing over for each stage of meiotic prophase I in Mus musculus, Caenorhabditis elegans, and Arabidopsis thaliana. Furthermore, we consider how sex-specific changes in the meiotic chromosome axes and the epigenetic landscape may function together to regulate crossing over in each sex, indicating that the mechanisms controlling crossing over may be different in oogenesis and spermatogenesis.

     

A cytological approach to studying meiotic recombination and chromosome dynamics in Arabidopsis thaliana male meiocytes in three dimensions

During meiotic prophase I chromosomes undergo dramatic conformational changes that accompany chromosome condensation, pairing and recombination between homologs. These changes include the anchoring of telomeres to the nuclear envelope and their clustering to form a bouquet. In plants, these events have been studied and illustrated in intact meiocytes of species with large genomes. Arabidopsis thaliana is an excellent genetic model in which major molecular pathways that control synapsis and recombination between homologs have been uncovered. Yet the study of chromosome dynamics is hampered by current cytological methods that disrupt the three‐dimensional (3D) architecture of the nucleus. Here we set up a protocol to preserve the 3D configuration of A. thaliana meiocytes. We showed that this technique is compatible with the use of a variety of antibodies that label structural and recombination proteins and were able to highlight the presence of clustered synapsis initiation centers at the nuclear periphery. By using fluorescence in situ hybridization we also studied the behavior of chromosomes during pre‐meiotic G₂ and prophase I, revealing the existence of a telomere bouquet during A. thaliana male meiosis. In addition we showed that the number of telomeres in a bouquet and its volume vary greatly, thus revealing the complexity of telomere behavior during meiotic prophase I. Finally, by using probes that label subtelomeric regions of individual chromosomes, we revealed differential localization behaviors of chromosome ends. Our protocol opens new areas of research for investigating chromosome dynamics in A. thaliana meiocytes.     

Improper chromosome synapsis is associated with elongated RAD51 structures in the maize<Emphasis Type="Italic"> desynaptic2</Emphasis> mutant

The RecA homolog, RAD51, performs a central role in catalyzing the DNA strand exchange event of meiotic recombination. During meiosis, RAD51 complexes develop on pairing chromosomes and then most disappear upon synapsis. In the maize meiotic mutant desynaptic2 (dsy2), homologous chromosome pairing and recombination are reduced by ~70% in male meiosis. Fluorescent in situ hybridization studies demonstrate that a normal telomere bouquet develops but the pairing of a representative gene locus is still only 25%. Chromosome synapsis is aberrant as exemplified by unsynapsed regions of the chromosomes. In the mutant, we observed unusual RAD51 structures during chromosome pairing. Instead of spherical single and double RAD51 structures, we saw long thin filaments that extended along or around a single chromosome or stretched between two widely separated chromosomes. Mapping with simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers places the dsy2 gene to near the centromere on chromosome 5, therefore it is not an allele of rad51. Thus, the normal dsy2 gene product is required for both homologous chromosome synapsis and proper RAD51 filament behavior when chromosomes pair. Edited by: P. Moens     

The maturation divisions of the parthenogenetic stick insect Carausius morosus Br. (Orthoptera,Phasmidae)

The meiotic stages in the maturation of the egg of the parthenogenetic stick insect Carausius morosus Br. is described. The meiosis consists of two equational divisions and parthenogenesis is thus apomictic. The first prometaphase is formed between 5.8–5.5 days before oviposition; the first metaphase lasts until oviposition; the meiosis ends between 14 and 24 hours after oviposition. An extra chromosome doubling occurs before first anaphase, causing the first metaphase chromosomes to resemble bivalents and requiring that meiosis consists of two divisions instead of one. A terminal affinity between the daughter chromosomes influences chromosome movement during first and second metaphase and anaphase. The first and second polar bodies degenerate. The first polar body divides amitotically during pycnosis. Meiosis takes place ventrally in the egg, the germ anlage development dorsally. The pronucleus divides mitotically in the ventral part of the egg during its migration from ventral to dorsal, enabling blastoderm development to take place both ventrally and dorsally.     

CRA-1 uncovers a double-strand break-dependent pathway promoting the assembly of central region proteins on chromosome axes during C. elegans meiosis

The synaptonemal complex (SC), a tripartite proteinaceous structure that forms between homologous chromosomes during meiosis, is crucial for faithful chromosome segregation. Here we identify CRA-1, a novel and conserved protein that is required for the assembly of the central region of the SC during C. elegans meiosis. In the absence of CRA-1, central region components fail to extensively localize onto chromosomes at early prophase and instead mostly surround the chromatin at this stage. Later in prophase, central region proteins polymerize along chromosome axes, but for the most part fail to connect the axes of paired homologous chromosomes. This defect results in an inability to stabilize homologous pairing interactions, altered double-strand break (DSB) repair progression, and a lack of chiasmata. Surprisingly, DSB formation and repair are required to promote the polymerization of the central region components along meiotic chromosome axes in cra-1 mutants. In the absence of both CRA-1 and any one of the C. elegans homologs of SPO11, MRE11, RAD51, or MSH5, the polymerization observed along chromosome axes is perturbed, resulting in the formation of aggregates of the SC central region proteins. While radiation-induced DSBs rescue this polymerization in cra-1; spo-11 mutants, they fail to do so in cra-1; mre-11, cra-1; rad-51, and cra-1; msh-5 mutants. Taken together, our studies place CRA-1 as a key component in promoting the assembly of a tripartite SC structure. Moreover, they reveal a scenario in which DSB formation and repair can drive the polymerization of SC components along chromosome axes in C. elegans.     

Telomeres act autonomously in maize to organize the meiotic bouquet from a semipolarized chromosome orientation

During meiosis, chromosomes undergo large-scale reorganization to allow pairing between homologues, which is necessary for recombination and segregation. In many organisms, pairing of homologous chromosomes is accompanied, and possibly facilitated, by the bouquet, the clustering of telomeres in a small region of the nuclear periphery. Taking advantage of the cytological accessibility of meiosis in maize, we have characterized the organization of centromeres and telomeres throughout meiotic prophase. Our results demonstrate that meiotic centromeres are polarized prior to the bouquet stage, but that this polarization does not contribute to bouquet formation. By examining telocentric and ring chromosomes, we have tested the cis-acting requirements for participation in the bouquet. We find that: (a) the healed ends of broken chromosomes, which contain telomere repeats, can enter the bouquet; (b) ring chromosomes enter the bouquet, indicating that terminal position on a chromosome is not necessary for telomere sequences to localize to the bouquet; and (c) beginning at zygotene, the behavior of telomeres is dominant over any centromere-mediated chromosome behavior. The results of this study indicate that specific chromosome regions are acted upon to determine the organization of meiotic chromosomes, enabling the bouquet to form despite large-scale changes in chromosome architecture.     

Localization and function of mSpindly during mouse oocyte meiotic maturation

Spindly was first identified in Drosophila; its homologues are termed SPDL-1 in Caenorhabditis elegans and Hs Spindly/hSpindly in humans. In all species, Spindly and its homologues function by recruiting dynein to kinetochores and silencing SAC in mitosis of somatic cells. Depletion of Spindly causes an extensive metaphase arrest during somatic mitoses in Drosophila, C. elegans and humans. In Drosophila, Spindly is required for shedding of Rod and Mad2 from the kinetochores in metaphase; in C. elegans, SPDL-1 presides over the recruitment of dynein and MDF-1 to the kinetochores; in humans, Hs Spindly is required for recruiting both dynein and dynactin to kinetochores but it is dispensable for removal of checkpoint proteins from kinetochores. The present study was designed to investigate the localization and function of the Spindly homologue (mSpindly) during mouse oocyte meiotic maturation by immunofluorescent analysis, and by overexpression and knockdown of mSpindly. We found that mSpindly was typically localized to kinetochores when chromatin condensed into chromosomes after GVBD. In metaphase of both first meiosis and second meiosis, mSpindly was localized not only to kinetochores but also to the spindle poles. Overexpression of mSpindly did not affect meiotic progression, but its depletion resulted in an arrest of the pro-MI/MI stage, failure of anaphase entry and subsequent polar body emission, and in abnormal spindle morphology and misaligned chromosomes. Our data suggest that mSpindly participates in SAC silencing and in spindle formation as a recruiter and/or a transporter of kinetochore proteins in mouse oocytes, but that it needs to cooperate with other factors to fulfill its function.