Sibutramine Produces Dose-Related Weight Loss

BRAY, GEORGE A., GEORGE L. BLACKBURN, JAMES M. FERGUSON, FRANK L. GREENWAY, ADESH K. JAIN, CARL M. MENDEL, JOSEPH MEN-DELS, DONNA H. RYAN, SHERWYN L. SCHWARTZ, MONTE L. SCHEINBAUM, AND TIMOTHY B. SEATON. Sibutramine produces dose-related weight loss. Obes Res. Objective Sibutramine is a weight control drug that inhibits the reuptake of both serotonin and norepinephrine. In animals, it reduces food intake and increases thermogenesis and preliminary data in human beings showed weight loss. This paper reports a 24-week dose-ranging study to determine the effect of sibutramine on body weight of patients with obesity. Research Methods and Procedures Seven clinical centers screened 1463 patients with obesity and randomized 1047 to 24 weeks of treatment with 1 of 6 doses of sibutramine (1, 5, 10, 15, 20, or 30 mg) or placebo once daily. Six hundred eighty-three patients completed the study. A two-week placebo run-in period was used to initiate a standardized program of diet, physical activity, and lifestyle changes. Results Weight loss was dose-related and statistically significant vs. placebo (p <0.05) across all time-points for a 5 mglday to 30 mglday dosage of sibutramine. At week 24, percent weight loss from baseline for completers was: placebo, 1.2%; 1 mg, 2.7%; 5 mg, 3.9%; 10 mg, 6.1%; 15 mg, 7.4%; 20 mg, 8.8%; and 30 mg, 9.4%. Weight loss achieved at week 4 was predictive of weight loss achieved at week 24. Patients losing weight demonstrated an increase in serum high density lipoprotein cholesterol and reductions in serum triglycerides, total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein cholesterol, and uric acid. Small mean increases in blood pressure and pulse rate (with considerable individual variability) were observed in patients treated with sibutramine. The most frequent adverse events were dry mouth, anorexia, and insomnia. Discussion Sibutramine administered once daily for 24 weeks in the weight loss phase of treatment for uncomplicated obesity produced dose-related weight loss and was well tolerated. Improvements in serum lipids and uric acid accompany sibutramine-induced weight loss. Most of the adverse events observed on sibutramine are related to its pharmacology, including small mean increases in blood pressure and heart rate.     

Effects of Sibutramine on Resting Metabolic Rate and Weight Loss in Overweight Women

Sibutramine, a monoamine re-uptake inhibitor, has recently been approved by the Food and Drug Administration as a weight loss agent. Sibutramine lowers body-weight in rodents by reducing energy intake and increasing energy expenditure. Sibutramine facilitates weight loss in human subjects, but it is not clear whether it acts on energy intake, energy expenditure, or both. The present study was a randomized clinical trial designed to assess the effects of sibutramine (at 10 or 30 mg/day) on body weight and resting metabolic rate (RMR). Forty-four overweight women were randomized to 1) placebo (n=15); 2) sibutramine at 10 mg/day (n=15) or, 3) sibutramine at 30 mg/day (n=14). All subjects were instructed to consume a 1200 kcal/day diet for 8 weeks while receiving drug or placebo. RMR was assessed by indirect calorimetry at baseline, at 3 hours after the first dose of drug (or placebo), and at the end of the 8-week weight-loss period. Sibutramine reduced body weight-relative to placebo, but there was no difference between weight loss on the two sibutramine doses. No significant differences in RMR between sibutramine and placebo were seen, either 3-hour post dose or after the 8-week weight-loss period. After the weight loss period, all groups were taken off medication and kept weight stable for another 4 weeks. RMR was measured again and was not different among groups. That there was no change in RMR when sibutramine was stopped further suggests that the drug does not directly affect RMR. In summary, while sibutramine was shown to be an effective weightloss agent over 8 weeks, we found no evidence that it increased RMR.     

Sibutramine: A Novel New Agent for Obesity Treatment

Sibutramine is a novel new pharmacologic agent which is a specific reuptake inhibitor for norepinephrine and serotonin. Preclinical data show that sibutramine and its two metabolites reduce food intake of animals eating either high or low carbohydrate diets and of obese Zucker rats. An 8-week clinical trial showed a dose-dependent decrease on body weight. Sibutramine, 5 and 20 mg/day, produced a dose-related weight loss in obese subjects compared to placebo in an 8-week trial. In doses varying from 1 to 30 mg, sibutramine also produced a dose-dependent decrease in weight in the healthy obese population when used in 6-,8-,12–24- and 52-week trials. Although the majority of the weight loss occurred during the first 12 weeks of treatment, weight loss had not plateaued in by 24 weeks in the higher doses. Side effects were mild. This drug shows promise as an antiobesity drug.     

Short-Term Effects of Sibutramine on Mineral Status and Selected Biochemical Parameters in Obese Women

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of sibutramine on mineral status and selected biochemical parameters in obese women. The study was conducted on 24 patients who received 15?mg daily doses of sibutramine for 12?weeks, and on 20 patients who received placebo. At the baseline, after the sixth and twelfth weeks of treatment, body weight and blood pressure were measured, the BMI was calculated, and samples of blood and of first morning urine were collected. Serum lipid profiles, glucose levels, and nitric oxide levels were determined. The iron (Fe), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), calcium (Ca), and magnesium (Mg) present in the serum and urine samples were assessed. The erythrocyte hemolysate of the patients was use to assay the activity of glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) and superoxide dismutase (SOD). No changes were observed in BMI, blood pressure, or nitric oxide during the study. After 12?weeks of treatment, a decrease was observed in total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, triglyceride, glucose, and ferritin levels. GSH-Px and SOD activity increased after 12?weeks of sibutramine treatment. The Mg and Cu increases was observed in serum after the sixth and twelfth weeks of treatment. It was found that the Zn level decreased in serum after the twelfth week. The elimination of Ca, Mg, Fe, Zn, and Cu in urine also declined in the twelfth week. No differences were found in the women taking the placebo. In conclusion, we found that sibutramine had a positive effect on lipid and glucose status in obese women. However, the drug disturbed the balance of minerals, especially Zn and Mg, in the subjects.     

Role of nifedipine in treatment of hypertension.

The efficacy of nifedipine in the treatment of hypertension was assessed in 15 patients whose hypertension continued while being treated with atenolol 100 mg and bendrofluazide 5 mg daily. Nifedipine was added in doses of 10, 20, and 30 mg three times daily in a placebo controlled, double blind trial. One patient was withdrawn from the trial because of severe postural hypotension with the highest dose. Erect and supine blood pressure in the remaining 14 patients were significantly reduced by all doses of nifedipine. The drug was well tolerated but plasma potassium fell by 0.3 mmol(mEq)/1 during treatment (p less than 0.05). Nifedipine is thus effective in the treatment of hypertension but should probably be used in combination with a potassium sparing diuretic.     

Sibutramine plus meal replacement therapy for body weight loss and maintenance in obese patients

Objective: Our objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of sibutramine with a low‐calorie diet (LCD) and commercial meal‐replacement product in achieving weight loss and weight‐loss maintenance in obese patients. Research Methods and Procedures: Eight U.S. centers recruited 148 obese patients for a 3‐month comprehensive weight‐loss therapy (Phase I) comprising daily sibutramine 10 mg + LCD (two Slim‐Fast meal‐replacement shakes, one low‐calorie meal; total kcal/d = 1200–1500). Patients (N = 113) who lost ≥5% of initial body weight during Phase I were randomized for a 9‐month period (Phase II) to daily sibutramine 15 mg + LCD (one meal‐replacement shake; two low‐calorie meals: total kcal/d ～1200–1500) or daily placebo + three low‐calorie meals (total kcal/d ～1200–1500). Both phases included behavior modification. Efficacy was assessed by body weight change during each phase and by the number of patients at endpoint maintaining ≥80% of the weight they had lost by the end of Phase I. Other outcomes included changes in cardiovascular and metabolic risk factors, adverse events, and vital signs. Results: Mean body weight change during Phase I was ?8.3 kg (p < 0.001). Patients randomized to sibutramine in Phase II had an additional ?2.5 kg mean weight loss vs. a 2.8‐kg increase in the placebo group (p < 0.001). More sibutramine patients maintained ≥80% of their Phase I weight loss at the end of Phase II (85.5% vs. placebo 36.7%, p < 0.001). Most adverse events were mild or moderate in severity, and all serious adverse events were unrelated to sibutramine. Discussion: Sibutramine plus LCD with meal replacements and behavior modification is a safe and effective strategy for achieving and sustaining weight loss in obese patients.     

NPY5R antagonism does not augment the weight loss efficacy of orlistat or sibutramine

Objective: Central counter‐regulatory mechanisms, including those related to the orexigenic hormone neuropeptide Y (NPY), may limit the weight loss observed with conventional pharmacological monotherapy. This study evaluated whether blockade of the NPY Y5 receptor (NPY5R) with the selective antagonist MK‐0557 potentiates sibutramine and orlistat weight loss effects. Research Methods and Procedures: Obese patients (497, BMI 30 to 43 kg/m²) were randomized to 1 of 5 treatment arms [placebo, n = 101; sibutramine 10 mg/d, n = 100; MK‐0557 1 mg/d plus sibutramine 10 mg/d, n = 98; orlistat 120 mg TID, n = 99; MK‐0557 1 mg/d plus orlistat 120 mg TID, n = 99] in conjunction with a hypocaloric diet for 24 weeks. The all‐patients‐treated population, imputing missing data using last observation carried forward, was used to assess weight loss from baseline. Results: The study was completed by 71% of patients in placebo, 76% in sibutramine alone, 79% in MK‐0557 + sibutramine, 69% in orlistat alone, and 76% in MK‐0557 + orlistat groups. Least squares (LS) mean difference [95% confidence interval (CI)] in weight change from baseline between MK‐0557 + sibutramine and sibutramine alone was ?0.1 (?1.6, 1.4) kg (p = 0.892) and between MK‐0557 + orlistat and orlistat alone was ?0.9 (?2.4, 0.6) kg (p = 0.250). Sibutramine alone induced a LS mean weight loss of ?5.9 (?6.9, ?4.9) kg vs. ?4.6 (?5.7, ?3.6) kg for orlistat (p = 0.097). There were no serious drug‐related adverse events and MK‐0557 was well tolerated. Discussion: Blockade of the NPY5R with the potent antagonist MK‐0557 did not significantly increase the weight loss efficacy of either orlistat or sibutramine monotherapy.     

Six‐Month Treatment of Obesity with Sibutramine 15 mg; A Double‐Blind,Placebo‐Controlled Monocenter Clinical Trial in a Hispanic Population

Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of sibutramine 15 mg by mouth once per day in obese patients over a period of 6 months. Research Methods and Procedures: A monocenter, double‐blind, placebo controlled, parallel, prospective clinical trial was carried out. Sixty‐nine male and female obese patients (body mass index [BMI] > 30 kg/m²) aged 16 to 65 years entered the trial. Results: 22 of 35 patients in the sibutramine group and 9 of 34 patients in the placebo group completed the trial. The high dropout rate in the sibutramine group was due to adverse events in 3 cases, lack of efficacy (as judged by patients) in 7, loss to follow‐up in 2, and an orthopedic device being worn in 1; in the placebo group the dropouts were ascribed to lack of efficacy (as judged by patients) in 17 cases and to loss to follow‐up in 8 cases. Using the method of last observation carried forward, the weight loss in the sibutramine group was 10.27 kg (95% confidence intervals [95% CI] 7.66; 13.07) and 1.26 kg (95% CI 0.3; 2.23) in the placebo group. The BMI loss was 4.17 kg/m² (95% CI 3.11; 5.22) in the sibutramine group and 0.53 kg/m² (95% CI 0.13; 0.92) in the placebo group. The waist circumference reduction was 12.51 cm (95% CI 9.25; 15.77) in the sibutramine group and 3.26 cm (95% CI 1.38; 5.14) in the control group (p < 0.05 by paired Student's t test for all the intragroup comparisons). Twenty‐three sibutramine patients had 34 adverse events, the most frequent adverse events in the sibutramine group were upper respiratory tract infections (n = 6) and constipation (n = 6); 16 placebo patients had 21 adverse events. Three sibutramine patients withdrew their informed consent when they had adverse events. Discussion: The results show that sibutramine induces significant loss of body weight and waist circumference. Cardiovascular function was not significantly affected by sibutramine. Sibutramine was well tolerated by most of the patients.     

A Comparison of Sibutramine and Dexfenfluramine in the Treatment of Obesity

Objective : Because long-term weight reduction is often unsuccessful with dietary restriction alone, pharmacological agents have been used to promote weight loss. We have compared the novel (multiple monoamine neurotransmitter reuptake inhibitor) antiobesity drug sibutramine (10 mg once daily) with the extensively studied serotonin-releasing antiobesity agent dexfenfluramine (15 mg twice daily). Research Methods and Procedures : 226 healthy outpatients (aged 18 to 65 years; body mass index ≥27 kg/m²) were included in a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel group study. The main outcome measures were changes in weight, body mass index, waist and hip circumference and ratio, and safety profiles. Results : Mean (±SEM) absolute weight loss was 4.5 ± 0.4 kg in the sibutramine group (n = 112) and 3.2 ± 0.3 kg in the dexfenfluramine group (n=112) (endpoint analysis); 4.7 ± 0.4 kg in the sibutramine group (n=101); and 3.6 ± 0.3 kg in the dexfenfluramine group (n = 94) (completers analysis). Comparing the two treatments under the conventional null hypothesis of equality as a secondary analysis, weight loss at endpoint in patients receiving sibutramine was significantly greater than that achieved with dexfenfluramine (p<0.05). Both drugs had similar adverse events profiles: 174 patients (77%) experienced adverse events; 17 patients withdrew due to adverse events (sibutramine, n = 6; dexfenfluramine, n = 11). Pulse rate increased significantly in sibutramine-treated patients (3.6 bpm), but decreased in dexfenfluramine-treated patients (-0.9 bpm). Discussion : Sibutramine (10 mg once daily) is at least as effective as dexfenfluramine (15 mg twice daily) in achieving weight loss in patients with obesity.     

Peripheral endocannabinoid system activity in patients treated with sibutramine

Objective: The endocannabinoid system (ECS) promotes weight gain and obesity‐associated metabolic changes. Weight loss interventions may influence obesity‐associated risk indirectly through modulation of the peripheral ECS. We investigated the effect of acute and chronic treatment with sibutramine on components of the peripheral ECS. Methods and Procedures: Twenty obese otherwise healthy patients received randomized, double‐blind, crossover treatment with placebo and 15 mg/day sibutramine for 5 days each, followed by 12 weeks open‐label sibutramine treatment. We determined circulating anandamide and 2‐arachidonoylglycerol and expression levels of endocannabinoid genes in subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue biopsies. Results: Body weight was stable during the acute treatment period and decreased by 6.0 ± 0.8 kg in those patients completing 3 months of sibutramine treatment (P < 0.05). Circulating endocannabinoids and the expression of ECS genes did not change with acute or chronic sibutramine treatment. Discussion: The ECS is activated in obesity. We did not find any influence of 5% body weight loss induced by sibutramine on circulating levels of endocannabinoids and adipose‐tissue expression of endocannabinoid genes in obese subjects. These data confirm our previous findings on dietary weight loss and suggest that the dysregulation of the ECS may be a cause rather than a consequence of obesity.     

Converting enzyme inhibition and kidney function in normotensive diabetic patients with persistent microalbuminuria.

The effects of a long term reduction in blood pressure on the kidney function of normotensive diabetic patients who had persistent microalbuminuria (30-300 mg albumin/24 hours) were studied in two groups of 10 such patients before and during six months of treatment with either 20 mg enalapril or placebo daily. Treatments were assigned randomly in a double blind fashion. Before treatment both groups had similar clinical characteristics, weight, diet, total glycosylated haemoglobin, median albumin excretion rate (enalapril group 124 mg/24 h, placebo group 81 mg/24 h), and mean arterial pressure (enalapril group 100 (SD 8) mm Hg, placebo group 99 (6) mm Hg). During treatment weight, urinary urea excretion, and total glycosylated haemoglobin remained unchanged. The mean arterial pressure decreased in the enalapril group but not in the placebo group (enalapril group 90 (10) mm Hg, placebo group 98 (8) mm Hg). The median albumin excretion rate also fell in the enalapril group but not in the placebo group (enalapril group 37 mg/24 h, placebo group 183 mg/24 h.) The glomerular filtration rate rose in the enalapril group from 130 (23) ml/min/1.73 m2 to 141 (24) ml/min/1.73 m2, and total renal resistances and fractional albumin clearance decreased while fractional albumin clearance increased in the placebo group. These results show that in patients who have diabetes but not hypertension a reduction in blood pressure by inhibition of converting enzyme for six months can reduce persistent microalbuminuria, perhaps by decreasing the intraglomerular pressure.     

Is DL-Fenfluramine a Potentially Helpful Drug Therapy in Overweight Adolescent Subjects?

We have studied the therapeutic effects of two different doses (30 mg and 60 mg, twice daily) of DL-fen-fluramine (DL-F) in, respectively, prepuberal (11–13 years old) and adolescent subjects (14–17 years old). Sixty-eight obese subjects were recruited for this study (22 boys, 36 girls, aged 10–17 years old) with body mass index ranging from 24.5 to 44.0 kg/m², absolute weight ranging from 37.0 to 119.5 kg and % over IBW ranging from 122% to 260%. Results were compared to a placebo treated group of obese adolescent patients (n=17), 6 boys and 11 girls, aged 10–17 years old, BMI ranging from 26–44 kg/m², absolute weight 53.1 to 96.5 kg, and with 129% to 253% over IBW. In the DL-F-treated subjects most patients (n=41) had a continuous weight loss during 12 months but 27 individuals were unable to lose any additional weight after the initial 6 months of the trial. Taken together 65% of all patients lost weight during DL-F treatment (12 months) whereas only 17.4% of the placebo group lost a significant (>10% BMI) amount of excess weight. Also the placebo group had a higher withdrawal rate (57%) as compared with the DL-F-treated group (24%). There was a significant (p<0.05) decrease of the mean & SD of the BMI (at 6 and 12 months of therapy). No significant change of the BMI was observed for control group. Minor adverse side effects consisted of a brief period of drowsiness and dry mouth. Our findings indicated that the continuous administration of DL-Fenfluramine might help obese adolescent subjects adhere to a diet and to maintain the weight loss achieved without major or harmful adverse effects .     

Influence of mevinolin on metabolism of low density lipoproteins in primary moderate hypercholesterolemia

Mevinolin, a competitive inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase, was used for treatment of 12 patients with moderate hypercholesterolemia, but not classical familial hypercholesterolemia. For most patients, measurements of turnover of low density lipoprotein-apolipoprotein B (LDL-apoB) were made on placebo and during treatment with two doses of mevinolin. LDL turnover was determined after injection of autologous 125I-labeled radioiodinated LDL. Compared to placebo, a low dose of mevinolin (10 mg, twice daily (BID] caused reductions of plasma total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol averaging 15% and 20%, respectively; corresponding reductions on high doses of mevinolin (20 mg BID) were 22% and 31%, respectively. Triglyceride levels were unchanged by the drug. High density lipoprotein cholesterol levels rose significantly on the high dose, but not on the low dose. Neither dose produced a stastistically significant change in fractional catabolic rate (FCR) for LDL-apoB for the whole group, although several patients had increases in FCR on both doses. In contrast, both doses of mevinolin caused decreases in production rates of LDL-apoB. Thus, the fall in LDL levels in patients with moderate hypercholesterolemia can be explained more by a reduction in the input rate of LDL-apoB than by enhanced fractional removal of LDL from the circulation.     

The human anti-IL-1β monoclonal antibody ACZ885 is effective in joint inflammation models in mice and in a proof-of-concept study in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Introduction

IL-1β is a proinflammatory cytokine driving joint inflammation as well as systemic signs of inflammation, such as fever and acute phase protein production.

Methods

ACZ885, a fully human monoclonal antibody that neutralizes the bioactivity of human IL-1β, was generated to study the potent and long-lasting neutralization of IL-1β in mechanistic animal models as well as in a proof-of-concept study in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Results

The mouse IL-1 receptor cross-reacts with human IL-1β, and it was demonstrated that ACZ885 can completely suppress IL-1β-mediated joint inflammation and cartilage destruction in mice. This observation prompted us to study the safety, tolerability and pharmacodynamic activity of ACZ885 in RA patients in a small proof-of-concept study – the first to be conducted in humans. Patients with active RA despite treatment with stable doses of methotrexate were enrolled in this dose escalation study. The first 32 patients were split into four cohorts of eight patients each (six were randomly assigned to active treatment and two to placebo). ACZ885 doses were 0.3, 1, 3 and 10 mg/kg, administered intravenously on days 1 and 15. To explore efficacy within 6 weeks of treatment, an additional 21 patients were randomly assigned to the 10 mg/kg cohort, resulting in a total of 20 patients dosed with 10 mg/kg and 15 patients treated with placebo. There was clinical improvement (American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria) at week 6 in the 10 mg/kg treatment group; however, this did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.085). A statistically significant reduction in disease activity score was observed after 4 weeks in the 10 mg/kg group. Onset of action was rapid, because most responders exhibited improvement in their symptoms within the first 3 weeks. C-reactive protein levels decreased in patients treated with ACZ885 within 1 week. ACZ885 was well tolerated. Three patients receiving ACZ885 developed infectious episodes that required treatment. No anti-ACZ885 antibodies were detected during the study.

Conclusion

ACZ885 administration to methotrexate-refractory patients resulted in clinical improvement in a subset of patients. Additional studies to characterize efficacy in RA and to determine the optimal dose regimen appear warranted.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00619905.     

Sibutramine Treatment in Obesity: Predictors of Weight Loss Including Rorschach Personality Data

Objective: To study personality and clinical factors in weight loss by sibutramine (Meridia and Reductil), an anti‐obesity drug enhancing satiety. Research Methods and Procedures: The subjects were 30 obese patients [43 ± 12 years (mean ± SD), BMI 40 ± 4 kg/m²]. The treatment comprised 15 mg of sibutramine administered daily and monthly dietary advice. Weight loss after 6 months of treatment was evaluated. For psychological assessment, the Rorschach method (Comprehensive System) and the Beck Depression Inventory were used. Results: A multiple linear regression model including the Rorschach predictors’ physical demand states (animal movement, designated as FM) being intrusive or difficult to hold and a dependency orientation (food contents) could explain 47% of 6 months of weight loss. A model including initial weight loss in addition to the Rorschach predictors explained 58% of the 6‐month weight loss. Discussion: The personality factors predicted greater weight loss. In particular, patients with difficulties concerning physical demand states, which would include hunger, could have reduced their eating behavior with enhanced satiety, resulting in greater weight loss. Enhanced satiety could also have helped patients with a dependent need for food to limit food intake. Being enrolled in a treatment program could also have provided essential support for patients with dependency needs. Furthermore, initial weight loss was a predictor of greater weight loss in sibutramine treatment, in accordance with prior research.     

Effects of Sibutramine Plus Orlistat in Obese Women Following 1 Year of Treatment by Sibutramine Alone: A Placebo‐Controlled Trial

Objective: This study assessed whether adding orlistat to sibutramine would induce further weight loss in patients who previously had lost weight while taking sibutramine alone. Research Methods and Procedures: Patients were 34 women with a mean age of 44.1 ± 10.4 years, weight of 89.4 ± 13.8 kg, and body mass index (BMI) of 33.9 ± 4.9 kg/m² who had lost an average of 11.6 ± 9.2% of initial weight during the prior 1 year of treatment by sibutramine combined with lifestyle modification. Patients were randomly assigned, in double‐blind fashion, to sibutramine plus orlistat or sibutramine plus placebo. In addition to medication, participants were provided five brief lifestyle modification visits during the 16‐week continuation trial. Results: Mean body weight did not change significantly in either treatment condition during the 16 weeks. The addition of orlistat to sibutramine did not induce further weight loss as compared with treatment by sibutramine alone (mean changes = +0.1 ± 4.1 kg vs. +0.5 ± 2.1 kg, respectively). Discussion: These results must be interpreted with caution because of the study's small sample size. The findings, however, suggest that the combination of sibutramine and orlistat is unlikely to have additive effects that will yield mean losses ≥15% of initial weight, as desired by many obese individuals.     

Metformin Decreases Food Consumption and Induces Weight Loss in Subjects with Obesity with Type II Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes

Metformin often promotes weight loss in patients with obesity with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). The mechanism may be attributed to decreased food intake. This study has tested the effect of metformin on satiety and its efficacy in inducing weight loss. Twelve diet-treated NIDDM women with obesity were randomly given two dose levels (850 mg or 1700 mg) of metformin or placebo at 0800 for three consecutive days followed by a meal test on the third day on three occasions using a 3times3 Latin square design. The number of sandwich canapes eaten in three consecutive 10-minute periods beginning at 1400 hours was used to quantitate food intake, and the level of subjective hunger was rated just before the sandwich meal with a linear analogue hunger rating scale at 1400 after a 6-hour fast. The prior administration of metformin produced a reduction in calorie intake after each of the two doses of metformin treatment. The 1700-mg metformin dose had the most marked appetite suppressant action. Similarly, hunger ratings were significantly lowered after metformin, and the effect was most pronounced after the administration of 1700 mg of metformin. To assess the efficacy of metformin in reducing bodyweight, 48 diet-treated NIDDM women with obesity who had failed to lose weight by diet therapy were first placed on a 1200-kcal ADA (American Diabetes Association) diet before being randomized to receive either metformin (850 mg) or placebo twice daily in a double-blind fashion for 24 weeks. A 4-week single-blind placebo lead-in period preceded and a 6-week single-blind placebo period followed the 24-week double-blind treatment period. Subjects treated with metformin continued to lose weight throughout 24 weeks of treatment; their mean maximum weight loss was 8 kg greater than that of the placebo group, with corresponding lower HbA1C and fasting blood glucose levels at the end of the active treatment period. These results indicate that metformin decreases calorie intake in a dose-dependent manner and leads to a reduction in bodyweight in NIDDM patients with obesity.     

Lorcaserin (APD356), a Selective 5‐HT2C Agonist,Reduces Body Weight in Obese Men and Women

Lorcaserin (APD356) is a potent, selective 5‐HT_2C agonist with ∼15‐fold and 100‐fold selectivity vs. 5‐HT_2A and 5‐HT_2B receptors, respectively. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of lorcaserin for weight reduction in obese patients during a 12‐week period. The randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐arm study enrolled 469 men and women between ages 18 and 65 and with BMI 30–45 kg/m². Patients received placebo, lorcaserin 10 mg q.d., lorcaserin 15 mg q.d., or lorcaserin 10 mg b.i.d. for 12 weeks, and were counseled to maintain their usual diet and activity. The primary end point was change in weight from baseline to day 85 by completer analysis. Safety analyses included echocardiograms at Screening and day 85/study exit. Lorcaserin was associated with progressive weight loss of 1.8 kg, 2.6 kg, and 3.6 kg at 10 mg q.d., 15 mg q.d., and 10 mg b.i.d., respectively, compared to placebo weight loss of 0.3 kg (P < 0.001 for each group). Similar results were seen by intent‐to‐treat last observation‐carried forward (ITT‐LOCF) analysis. The proportions of completers achieving ≥5% of initial body weight were 12.8, 19.5, 31.2, and 2.3% in the 10 mg q.d., 15 mg q.d., 10 mg b.i.d., and placebo groups, respectively. The most frequent adverse events (AEs) were transient headache, nausea, and dizziness. Echocardiograms showed no apparent drug‐related effects on heart valves or pulmonary artery pressure (PAP). Lorcaserin was well tolerated and efficacious for weight reduction in this 12‐week study. Longer‐term trials employing behavior modification will be needed to more fully assess its safety and efficacy.     

Influence of Sibutramine on Energy Expenditure in African American Women

Objective: African American women have a high prevalence of obesity, which partially may be explained by their lower rates of resting energy expenditure (REE). The aim of this study was to examine the influence of acute sibutramine administration on REE and post‐exercise energy expenditure in African American women. Research Methods and Procedures: A total of 15 premenopausal, African American women (age, 29 ± 5 years; body fat, 38 ± 7%) completed a randomized, double‐blind cross‐over design with a 30‐mg ingestion of sibutramine or a placebo. Each trial was completed a month apart in the follicular phase and included a 30‐minute measurement of REE 2.5 hours after sibutramine or placebo administration. This was followed by 40 minutes of cycling at ～70% of peak aerobic capacity and a subsequent 2‐hour measurement of post‐cycling energy expenditure. Results: There was no difference (p > 0.05) in REE (23.70 ± 2.81 vs. 23.69 ± 2.95 kcal/30 min), exercise oxygen consumption (1.22 ± 0.15 vs. 1.25 ± 0.15 liter/min), and post‐cycling energy expenditure (104.2 ± 12.7 vs. 104.9 ± 11.4 kcal/120 min) between the sibutramine and placebo trials, respectively. Cycling heart rate was significantly higher (p = 0.01) during the sibutramine (158 ± 14 beats/min) vs. placebo (150 ± 12 beats/min) trials. Discussion: These data demonstrate that acute sibutramine ingestion does not increase REE or post‐exercise energy expenditures but does increase exercising heart rate in overweight African American women. Sibutramine may, therefore, impact weight loss through energy intake and not energy expenditure mechanisms.     

Developmental toxicity evaluation of orthovanadate in the mouse

Sodium orthovanadate in deionized water was administered once daily by gavage on gestational days 6-15 to mice at doses of 0, 7.5, 15, 30, and 60 mg/kg. Dams were killed on day 18 of pregnancy, and fetuses were examined for external, visceral, and skeletal defects. Maternal toxicity was observed at the highest doses of sodium orthovanadate, as evidenced by a significant number of deaths (60 and 30 mg/kg/d) and reduced weight gain and food consumption (30 and 15 mg/kg/d). Embryolethality and teratogenicity were not observed at maternally toxic doses and below, but fetal toxicity was evidenced by a significant delay in the ossification process of some skeletal districts at 30 mg/kg/d. The no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) for maternal toxicity was 7.5 mg/kg/d, and 15 mg/kg/d represented a NOAEL for developmental toxicity in mice under the conditions of this study.