The evolutionary origin of peroxisomes: an ER-peroxisome connection

The peroxisome is an essential eukaryotic organelle, crucial for lipid metabolism and free radical detoxification, development, differentiation, and morphogenesis from yeasts to humans. Loss of peroxisomes invariably leads to fatal peroxisome biogenesis disorders in man. The evolutionary origin of peroxisomes remains unsolved; proposals for either a symbiogenetic or cellular membrane invagination event are unconclusive. To address this question, we have probed with a peroxisomal proteome, an "ensemble" of 19 representative eukaryotic complete genomes. Molecular phylogenetic and sequence comparison tools allowed us to identify four proteins as peroxisomal markers for unequivocal in silico peroxisome detection. We have then detected the Apicomplexa phylum as the first group of organisms devoid of peroxisomes, in the presence of mitochondria. Finally, we deliver evidence against a prokaryotic ancestor of peroxisomes: (1) the peroxisomal membrane is composed of purely eukaryotic bricks and is thus useful to trace the eukaryotes in their evolutionary paths and (2) the peroxisomal matrix protein import system shares mechanistic similarities with the endoplasmic reticulum/proteasome degradation process, indicating a common evolutionary history.     

Divide et Impera: The Dictum of Peroxisomes

Peroxisomes are unique organelles which display properties of autonomous organelles, as they can multiply by fission of pre‐existing ones. Peroxisomes, however, can also develop from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). This process has convincingly been shown in peroxisome‐deficient yeast cells, upon reintroduction of the corresponding gene. Whether peroxisomes also are formed from the ER in wild‐type cells that contain peroxisomes is still under debate. Also, the existence of vesicular transport pathways between peroxisomes and the ER is still unresolved. Several new proteins and pathways that play a role in peroxisome proliferation have been identified in the last few years. A surprising finding was that proteins well known for their function in mitochondrial fission (Fis1, Dnm1) are responsible for peroxisome fission as well. In this contribution we discuss recent advancements in research on peroxisome proliferation.     

Phosphatidylethanolamine synthesized by three different pathways is supplied to peroxisomes of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae three pathways lead to the formation of phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), namely decarboxylation of phosphatidylserine (PS) (i) by Psd1p in mitochondria, and (ii) by Psd2p in a Golgi/vacuolar compartment; and (iii) synthesis via CDP–ethanolamine pathway in the endoplasmic reticulum. To determine the contribution of these pathways to the supply of PE to peroxisomes, we subjected mutants bearing defects in the respective metabolic routes to biochemical and cell biological analysis. Despite these defects in PE formation mutants were able to grow on oleic acid indicating induction of peroxisome proliferation. Biochemical analysis revealed that PE formed through all three pathways was supplied to peroxisomes. These analyses also demonstrated that selective as well as equilibrium interorganelle flux of PE appear to be equally important for cellular homeostasis of this phospholipid. Electron microscopic inspection confirmed that defects in PE synthesis still allowed formation of peroxisomes, although these organelles from strains lacking PSD1 were significantly smaller than wild type. The fact that peroxisomes were always found in close vicinity to mitochondria, ER and lipid particles supported the view that membrane contact may play a role in lipid traffic between these organelles.     

Determinants of the assembly,integrity and maintenance of the endoplasmic reticulum‐peroxisome tether

Organelle tethering and intercommunication are crucial for proper cell function. We previously described a tether between peroxisomes and the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) that acts in peroxisome population control in the yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Components of this tether are Pex3p, an integral membrane protein of both peroxisomes and the ER and Inp1p, a connector that links peroxisomes to the ER. Here, we report the analysis of random Inp1p mutants that enabled identification of regions in Inp1p required for the assembly and maintenance of the ER‐peroxisome tether. Interaction analysis between Inp1p mutants and known Inp1p‐binding proteins demonstrated that Pex3p and Inp1p do not constitute the sole components of the ER‐peroxisome tether. Deletion of these Inp1p interactors whose steady‐state localization is outside of ER‐peroxisome tethers affected peroxisome dynamics. Our findings are consistent with the presence of regulatory cues that act on ER‐peroxisome tethers and point to the existence of membrane contact sites between peroxisomes and organelles other than the ER.      

Two small protein families, DYNAMIN-RELATED PROTEIN3 and FISSION1, are required for peroxisome fission in Arabidopsis

Peroxisomes are multi-functional organelles that differ in size and abundance depending on the species, cell type, developmental stage, and metabolic and environmental conditions. The PEROXIN11 protein family and the DYNAMIN-RELATED PROTEIN3A (DRP3A) protein have been shown previously to play key roles in peroxisome division in Arabidopsis. To establish a mechanistic model of peroxisome division in plants, we employed forward and reverse genetic approaches to identify more proteins involved in this process. In this study, we identified three new components of the Arabidopsis peroxisome division apparatus: DRP3B, a homolog of DRP3A, and FISSION1A and 1B (FIS1A and 1B), two homologs of the yeast and mammalian FIS1 proteins that mediate the fission of peroxisomes and mitochondria by tethering the DRP proteins to the membrane. DRP3B is partially targeted to peroxisomes and causes defects in peroxisome fission when the gene function is disrupted. drp3A drp3B double mutants display stronger deficiencies than each single mutant parent with respect to peroxisome abundance, seedling establishment and plant growth, suggesting partial functional redundancy between DRP3A and DRP3B. In addition, FIS1A and FIS1B are each dual-targeted to peroxisomes and mitochondria; their mutants show growth inhibition and contain peroxisomes and mitochondria with incomplete fission, enlarged size and reduced number. Our results demonstrate that both DRP3 and FIS1 protein families contribute to peroxisome fission in Arabidopsis, and support the view that DRP and FIS1 orthologs are common components of the peroxisomal and mitochondrial division machineries in diverse eukaryotic species.     

Detailed analytical subcellular fractionation of non-pregnant porcine corpus luteum reveals peroxisomes of normal size and significant UDP-glucuronosyltransferase activity in the high-speed supernatant

A detailed subfractionation of the non-pregnant porcine corpus luteum (CL) was performed employing differential centrifugation. Marker enzyme assays (i.e., lactate dehydrogenase for the cytosol, NADPH-cytochrome P450 reductase for the endoplasmatic reticulum, catalase (CAT) for peroxisomes, glutamate dehydrogenase for the mitochondrial matrix and acid phosphatase for lysosomes) in all subfractions obtained exhibited a pattern of distribution similar to that observed with rat liver. These subfractions should be useful in connection with many types of future studies. In disagreement with previous biochemical and morphological studies, peroxisomes (identified on the basis of catalase activity and by Western blotting of catalase and of the major peroxisomal membrane protein (PMP-70)) sedimented together with mitochondria (i.e., at 5000 x g(av) for 10 min) and not in the post-mitochondrial fraction prepared at 30,000 x g(av) for 20 min by Peterson and Stevensson. No other classical peroxisomal enzymes were detectable in the porcine ovary, raising questions concerning the function of peroxisomes in this organ. Furthermore, UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT), generally considered to be an integral membrane protein anchored in the endoplasmatic reticulum, was recovered in both the cytosolic (i.e., the supernatant after centrifugation at 50,000 x g(av) for 1h) and the microsomal fraction of the porcine corpus luteum, even upon further centrifugation of the former. In contrast, UGT sediments exclusively in the microsomal fraction upon subfractionation of the liver and ovary from rat.     

Novel proteins, putative membrane transporters, and an integrated metabolic network are revealed by quantitative proteomic analysis of Arabidopsis cell culture peroxisomes

Peroxisomes play key roles in energy metabolism, cell signaling, and plant development. A better understanding of these important functions will be achieved with a more complete definition of the peroxisome proteome. The isolation of peroxisomes and their separation from mitochondria and other major membrane systems have been significant challenges in the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) model system. In this study, we present new data on the Arabidopsis peroxisome proteome obtained using two new technical advances that have not previously been applied to studies of plant peroxisomes. First, we followed density gradient centrifugation with free-flow electrophoresis to improve the separation of peroxisomes from mitochondria. Second, we used quantitative proteomics to identify proteins enriched in the peroxisome fractions relative to mitochondrial fractions. We provide evidence for peroxisomal localization of 89 proteins, 36 of which have not previously been identified in other analyses of Arabidopsis peroxisomes. Chimeric green fluorescent protein constructs of 35 proteins have been used to confirm their localization in peroxisomes or to identify endoplasmic reticulum contaminants. The distribution of many of these peroxisomal proteins between soluble, membrane-associated, and integral membrane locations has also been determined. This core peroxisomal proteome from nonphotosynthetic cultured cells contains a proportion of proteins that cannot be predicted to be peroxisomal due to the lack of recognizable peroxisomal targeting sequence 1 (PTS1) or PTS2 signals. Proteins identified are likely to be components in peroxisome biogenesis, beta-oxidation for fatty acid degradation and hormone biosynthesis, photorespiration, and metabolite transport. A considerable number of the proteins found in peroxisomes have no known function, and potential roles of these proteins in peroxisomal metabolism are discussed. This is aided by a metabolic network analysis that reveals a tight integration of functions and highlights specific metabolite nodes that most probably represent entry and exit metabolites that could require transport across the peroxisomal membrane.     

Peroxisome biogenesis: advances and conundrums

Investigations of peroxisome biogenesis in diverse organisms reveal new details of this unique process and its evolutionary conservation. Interactions among soluble receptors and the membrane peroxins that catalyze protein translocation are being mapped. Ubiquitination is observed. A receptor enters the organelle carrying folded cargo and recycles back to the cytosol. Tiny peroxisome remnants - vesicles and tubules - are discovered in pex3 mutants that lack the organelle. When the mutant is transfected with a good PEX3 gene, these protoperoxisomes acquire additional membrane peroxins and then import the matrix enzymes to reform peroxisomes. Thus, de novo formation need not be postulated. Dynamic imaging of yeast reveals dynamin-dependent peroxisome division and regulated actin-dependent segregation of the organelle before cell division. These results are consistent with biogenesis by growth and division of pre-existing peroxisomes.     

The origin and maintenance of mammalian peroxisomes involves a de novo PEX16-dependent pathway from the ER

Peroxisomes are ubiquitous organelles that proliferate under different physiological conditions and can form de novo in cells that lack them. The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) has been shown to be the source of peroxisomes in yeast and plant cells. It remains unclear, however, whether the ER has a similar role in mammalian cells and whether peroxisome division or outgrowth from the ER maintains peroxisomes in growing cells. We use a new in cellula pulse-chase imaging protocol with photoactivatable GFP to investigate the mechanism underlying the biogenesis of mammalian peroxisomes. We provide direct evidence that peroxisomes can arise de novo from the ER in both normal and peroxisome-less mutant cells. We further show that PEX16 regulates this process by being cotranslationally inserted into the ER and serving to recruit other peroxisomal membrane proteins to membranes. Finally, we demonstrate that the increase in peroxisome number in growing wild-type cells results primarily from new peroxisomes derived from the ER rather than by division of preexisting peroxisomes.     

Pex3p initiates the formation of a preperoxisomal compartment from a subdomain of the endoplasmic reticulum in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Peroxisomes are dynamic organelles that often proliferate in response to compounds that they metabolize. Peroxisomes can proliferate by two apparent mechanisms, division of preexisting peroxisomes and de novo synthesis of peroxisomes. Evidence for de novo peroxisome synthesis comes from studies of cells lacking the peroxisomal integral membrane peroxin Pex3p. These cells lack peroxisomes, but peroxisomes can assemble upon reintroduction of Pex3p. The source of these peroxisomes has been the subject of debate. Here, we show that the amino-terminal 46 amino acids of Pex3p of Saccharomyces cerevisiae target to a subdomain of the endoplasmic reticulum and initiate the formation of a preperoxisomal compartment for de novo peroxisome synthesis. In vivo video microscopy showed that this preperoxisomal compartment can import both peroxisomal matrix and membrane proteins leading to the formation of bona fide peroxisomes through the continued activity of full-length Pex3p. Peroxisome formation from the preperoxisomal compartment depends on the activity of the genes PEX14 and PEX19, which are required for the targeting of peroxisomal matrix and membrane proteins, respectively. Our findings support a direct role for the endoplasmic reticulum in de novo peroxisome formation.     

A Combined Approach of Quantitative Interaction Proteomics and Live-cell Imaging Reveals a Regulatory Role for Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER) Reticulon Homology Proteins in Peroxisome Biogenesis

Peroxisome biogenesis initiates at the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and maturation allows for the formation of metabolically active organelles. Yet, peroxisomes can also multiply by growth and division. Several proteins, called peroxins, are known to participate in these processes but little is known about their organization to orchestrate peroxisome proliferation. Here, we demonstrate that regulation of peroxisome proliferation relies on the integrity of the tubular ER network. Using a dual track SILAC-based quantitative interaction proteomics approach, we established a comprehensive network of stable as well as transient interactions of the peroxin Pex30p, an integral membrane protein. Through association with merely ER resident proteins, in particular with proteins containing a reticulon homology domain, and with other peroxins, Pex30p designates peroxisome contact sites at ER subdomains. We show that Pex30p traffics through the ER and segregates in punctae to which peroxisomes specifically append, and we ascertain its transient interaction with all subunits of the COPI coatomer complex suggesting the involvement of a vesicle-mediated transport. We establish that the membrane protein Pex30p facilitates the connection of peroxisomes to the ER. Taken together, our data indicate that Pex30p-containing protein complexes act as focal points from which peroxisomes can form and that the tubular ER architecture organized by the reticulon homology proteins Rtn1p, Rtn2p and Yop1p controls this process.All nucleated cells contain essential round-shaped organelles called peroxisomes, whose function is mainly associated with lipid metabolism (1). Depending on the cellular requirements, the size, number, and protein content of these single membrane-bound organelles can vary widely. Although peroxisomes are dispensable for unicellular species such as yeasts, they are essential for the development of multicellular organisms (2, 3). In human, mutations in PEX genes lead to defects in peroxisome function or formation and are associated with the development of lethal pathologies (4). These PEX genes code for proteins, called peroxins, which are involved in peroxisome assembly and maintenance (5).Two major routes seem to lead to peroxisome formation, namely, de novo biogenesis and growth/division of pre-existing peroxisomes. The division pathway operates with proteins of the Pex11 family and requires fission factors shared with mitochondria (6). Studies in yeast and mammalian cells revealed that through the action of the protein Pex3p peroxisome precursors can also originate from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER)¹ and, via import of membrane and matrix proteins, mature into fully functional organelles (7, 8). Furthermore, several peroxisomal membrane proteins were shown to migrate to peroxisomes via the ER (7, 9, 10). The molecular mechanism underlying the biogenic pathway of peroxisome formation has not been clarified so far. Recent data based on cell-free vesicle-budding reactions, however, demonstrated that several peroxisomal proteins traffic from the ER to peroxisomes in a COPII vesicle-independent manner (11). These observations point to the existence of vesicular events to mediate the transport of peroxisomal membrane proteins from the ER. In fact, analysis of secretory mutant yeast cells already suggest that part of the ER-associated secretory machinery is involved in peroxisome biogenesis (12).The de novo biogenesis of peroxisomes and the growth/division pathways are usually seen as independent routes; however, these events may be coordinated and, thus, intimately linked. Indeed, peroxisomes need to acquire membrane components to proliferate and it has been proposed that their binding to the cell cortex or to the cytoskeleton allows their partitioning and segregation during cell division (13–15).Among the proteins required for assembly of peroxisomes, the membrane proteins Pex23p and Pex24p play essential roles in the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica (16, 17). Homologs of these two proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae are Pex30p, Pex31p, and Pex32p, all containing at least one transmembrane domain and a dysferlin domain as common structural motifs, as well as Pex28p and Pex29p. In S. cerevisiae, these proteins seem to negatively control peroxisomal size and number (18, 19). Interestingly, Pex30p seems to exhibit species-specific differences in the regulation of peroxisome proliferation. While the lack of Pex30p in S. cerevisiae leads to an increase in the number of normal-sized peroxisomes (18), in Pichia pastoris its absence correlates with the appearance of fewer and clustered peroxisomes (20). Although peroxisomes are highly versatile organelles, under given conditions their total number per cell remains fairly constant owing to the delicate balance of proliferation, inheritance and degradation (21, 22). The question is: what are the molecular mechanisms responsible for the spatiotemporal organization of these events?Here, we present data obtained from a dual approach based on quantitative interaction proteomics using stable isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) (23, 24) and live-cell imaging, revealing for the first time the dynamic interaction network around Pex30p and its function in the organization of ER-to-peroxisome membrane associations. We report the existence of a macromolecular membrane protein complex that acts as a hub for the regulation of peroxisome proliferation and movement. Our data suggest a direct role for the tubular cortical ER and the reticulon homology proteins Rtn1p, Rtn2p, and Yop1p in the regulation of peroxisome biogenesis. Furthermore, as an initially cortical-ER localized protein that interacts with reticulon homology proteins, Pex30p is shown in this work to establish contacts between ER tubules and peroxisomes and to specifically traffic through the ER. In summary, our data reveal a central role for Pex30p in the formation of ER-to-peroxisomes associations that appear to be involved in the coordination of peroxisome biogenesis and maintenance.     

Peroxisome Formation Requires the Endoplasmic Reticulum Channel Protein Sec61

In peroxisome formation, models of near‐autonomous peroxisome biogenesis with membrane protein integration directly from the cytosol into the peroxisomal membrane are in direct conflict with models whereby peroxisomes bud from the endoplasmic reticulum and receive their membrane proteins through a branch of the secretory pathway. We therefore reinvestigated the role of the Sec 61 complex, the protein‐conducting channel of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) in peroxisome formation. We found that depletion or partial inactivation of Sec 61 in yeast disables peroxisome formation. The ER entry of the early peroxisomal membrane protein Pex 3 engineered with a glycosylation tag is reduced in sec61 mutant cells. Moreover, we were able to reconstitute Pex 3 import into ER membranes in vitro, and we identified a variant of a signal anchor sequence for ER translocation at the Pex 3 N‐terminus. Our findings are consistent with a Sec 61 requirement for peroxisome formation and a fundamental role of the ER in peroxisome biogenesis.     

Peroxisome development in yeast is associated with the formation of Pex3-dependent peroxisome-vacuole contact sites

Using electron and fluorescence microscopy techniques, we identified various physical contacts between peroxisomes and other cell organelles in the yeast Hansenula polymorpha.In exponential glucose-grown cells, which typically contain a single small peroxisome, contacts were only observed with the endoplasmic reticulum and the plasma membrane. Here we focus on a novel peroxisome-vacuole contact site that is formed when glucose-grown cells are shifted to methanol containing media, conditions that induce strong peroxisome development. At these conditions, the small peroxisomes rapidly increase in size, a phenomenon that is paralleled by the formation of distinct intimate contacts with the vacuole.Localization studies showed that the peroxin Pex3 accumulated in patches at the peroxisome-vacuole contact sites. In wild-type cells growing exponentially on medium containing glucose, peroxisome-vacuole contact sites were never observed. However, upon overproduction of Pex3 peroxisomes also associated to vacuoles at these growth conditions.Our observations strongly suggest a role for Pex3 in the formation of a novel peroxisome-vacuole contact site. This contact likely plays a role in membrane growth as it is formed solely at conditions of strong peroxisome expansion.     

Pexophagy: autophagic degradation of peroxisomes

The abundance of peroxisomes within a cell can rapidly decrease by selective autophagic degradation (also designated pexophagy). Studies in yeast species have shown that at least two modes of peroxisome degradation are employed, namely macropexophagy and micropexophagy. During macropexophagy, peroxisomes are individually sequestered by membranes, thus forming a pexophagosome. This structure fuses with the vacuolar membrane, resulting in exposure of the incorporated peroxisome to vacuolar hydrolases. During micropexophagy, a cluster of peroxisomes is enclosed by vacuolar membrane protrusions and/or segmented vacuoles as well as a newly formed membrane structure, the micropexophagy-specific membrane apparatus (MIPA), which mediates the enclosement of the vacuolar membrane. Subsequently, the engulfed peroxisome cluster is degraded. This review discusses the current state of knowledge of pexophagy with emphasis on studies on methylotrophic yeast species.     

Peroxisome biogenesis in yeast

Eukaryotic cells have evolved a complex set of intracellular organelles, each of which possesses a specific complement of enzymes and performs unique metabolic functions. This compartmentalization of cellular functions provides a level of metabolic control not available to prokaryotes. However, it presents the eukaryotic cell with the problem of targeting proteins to their specific location(s). Proteins must be efficiently transported from their site of synthesis in the cytosol to their specific organelle(s). Such a process may require translocation across one or more hydrophobic membrane barriers and/or asymmetric integration into specific membranes. Proteins carry cis-acting amino acid sequences that serve to act as recognition motifs for protein sorting and for the cellular translocation machinery. Sequences that target proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum/secretory pathway, mitochondria, and chloroplasts are often present as cleavable amino-terminal extensions. In contrast, most peroxisomal proteins are synthesized at their mature size and are translocated to the organelle without any post-translational modification. This review will summarize what is known about how yeast solve the problem of specifically importing proteins into peroxisomes and will suggest future directions for investigations into peroxisome biogenesis in yeast.     

The control of peroxisome number and size during division and proliferation

Like other subcellular organelles, peroxisomes divide and segregate to daughter cells during cell division, but this organelle can also proliferate or be degraded in response to environmental cues. Although the mechanisms and genes involved in these processes are still under active investigation, an important player in peroxisome proliferation is a dynamin-related protein (DRP) that is recruited to the organelle membrane by a DRP receptor. Related DRPs also function in the division of mitochondria and chloroplasts. Many other proteins and signals regulate peroxisome division and proliferation, but their modes of action are still being studied.     

Insights into the membrane proteome of rat liver peroxisomes: microsomal glutathione-S-transferase is shared by both subcellular compartments

Peroxisomes are ubiquitous "multipurpose" organelles of eukaryotic cells. Their matrix enzymes catalyze mainly catabolic and anabolic reactions of lipid metabolism, thus contributing to the regulation of lipid homeostasis. Since most metabolites must be actively transported across the peroxisomal membrane and since individual proteins and protein complexes play functional roles in such transport processes, we analyzed the peroxisomal membrane proteome. Benzyldimethyl-n-hexadecylammoniumchloride (16-BAC)/SDS-2-D-PAGE and mass spectrometry were used to characterize the proteomes of highly purified "light" and "heavy" peroxisomes of rat liver obtained by density gradient centrifugation. In both populations, the major integral membrane proteins could be detected in high concentrations, verifying 16-BAC/SDS-2-D-PAGE as a suitable tool for the preparation of membrane proteomes destined for mass spectrometric analysis. Both reliable and reproducible detection of a distinct set of microsomal (ER) membrane proteins, including microsomal glutathione-S-transferase (mGST), in light and heavy peroxisomal fractions was also possible. Compared with the abundance of most microsomal membrane proteins, we found mGST to be specifically enriched in peroxisomal membrane fractions. Furthermore, C terminus epitope-tagged mGST versions were localized at least in part to peroxisomes in different mammalian cell lines. Taken together, these data suggest that the peroxisomal GST is not a mere ER-contaminant, but a bona fide protein comprising the membrane proteome of both intracellular compartments. In addition, we could detect several mitochondrial proteins in light peroxisome fractions. This finding may likely indicate a physical association of light peroxisomes with mitochondria, since the organelles could be partly separated by mechanical stress. Whether this association is of functional importance awaits further investigation.     

Glucose-induced and nitrogen-starvation-induced peroxisome degradation are distinct processes in Hansenula polymorpha that involve both common and unique genes

In the methylotrophic yeast Hansenula polymorpha non-selective autophagy, induced by nitrogen starvation, results in the turnover of cytoplasmic components, including peroxisomes. We show that the uptake of these components occurs by invagination of the vacuolar membrane without their prior sequestration and thus differs from the mechanism described for bakers yeast. A selective mode of autophagy in H. polymorpha, namely glucose-induced peroxisome degradation, involves sequestration of individual peroxisomes tagged for degradation by membrane layers that subsequently fuse with the vacuole where the organelle is digested. H. polymorpha pdd mutants are blocked in selective peroxisome degradation. We observed that pdd1-201 is also impaired in non-selective autophagy, whereas this process still normally functions in pdd2-4. These findings suggest that mechanistically distinct processes as selective and non-selective autophagy involve common but also unique genes.     

Expression of the Cymbidium ringspot virus 33-kilodalton protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and molecular dissection of the peroxisomal targeting signal

Open reading frame 1 in the viral genome of Cymbidium ringspot virus encodes a 33-kDa protein (p33), which was previously shown to localize to the peroxisomal membrane in infected and transgenic plant cells. To determine the sequence requirements for the organelle targeting and membrane insertion, the protein was expressed in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae in native form (33K) or fused to the green fluorescent protein (33KGFP). Cell organelles were identified by immunolabeling of marker proteins. In addition, peroxisomes were identified by simultaneous expression of the red fluorescent protein DsRed containing a peroxisomal targeting signal and mitochondria by using the dye MitoTracker. Fluorescence microscopy showed the 33KGFP fusion protein concentrated in a few large bodies colocalizing with peroxisomes. These bodies were shown by electron microscopy to be composed by aggregates of peroxisomes, a few mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) strands. In immunoelectron microscopy, antibodies to p33 labeled the peroxisomal clumps. Biochemical analysis suggested that p33 is anchored to the peroxisomal membrane through a segment of ca. 7 kDa, which corresponds to the sequence comprising two hydrophobic transmembrane domains and a hydrophilic interconnecting loop. Analysis of deletion mutants confirmed these domains as essential components of the p33 peroxisomal targeting signal, together with a cluster of three basic amino acids (KRR). In yeast mutants lacking peroxisomes p33 was detected in the ER. The possible involvement of the ER as an intermediate step for the integration of p33 into the peroxisomal membrane is discussed.