Hyperbolic relationship between insulin secretion and sensitivity on oral glucose tolerance test

The utility of the disposition index as a measure of beta-cell compensatory capacity rests on the established hyperbolic relationship between its component insulin secretion and sensitivity measures as derived from the intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT). If one is to derive an analogous measure of beta-cell compensation from the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), it is thus necessary to first establish the existence of this hyperbolic relationship between OGTT-based measures of insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity. In this context, we tested five OGTT-based measures of secretion (insulinogenic index, Stumvoll first phase, Stumvoll second phase, ratio of total area-under-the-insulin-curve to area-under-the-glucose-curve (AUC(ins/gluc)), and incremental AUC(ins/gluc)) with two measures of sensitivity (Matsuda index and 1/Homeostasis Model of Assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR)). Using a model of log(secretion measure) = constant + beta x log(sensitivity measure), a hyperbolic relationship can be established if beta is approximately equal to -1, with 95% confidence interval (CI) excluding 0. In 277 women with normal glucose tolerance (NGT), the pairing of total AUC(ins/gluc) and Matsuda index was the only combination that satisfied these criteria (beta = -0.99, 95% CI (-1.66, -0.33)). This pairing also satisfied hyperbolic criteria in 53 women with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) (beta = -1.02, (-1.72, -0.32)). In a separate data set, this pairing yielded distinct hyperbolae for NGT (n = 245) (beta = -0.99, (-1.67, -0.32)), IGT (n = 116) (beta = -1.18, (-1.84, -0.53)), and diabetes (n = 43) (beta = -1.37, (-2.46, -0.29)). Moreover, the product of AUC(ins/gluc) and Matsuda index progressively decreased from NGT (212) to IGT (193) to diabetes (104) (P < 0.001), consistent with declining beta-cell function. In summary, a hyperbolic relationship can be demonstrated between OGTT-derived AUC(ins/gluc) and Matsuda index across a range of glucose tolerance. Based on these findings, the product of these two indices emerges as a potential OGTT-based measure of beta-cell function.     

The relationship between fasting hyperglycemia and insulin secretion in subjects with normal or impaired glucose tolerance

To assess the relationship between the fasting plasma glucose (FPG) concentration and insulin secretion in normal glucose tolerance (NGT) and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) subjects, 531 nondiabetic subjects with NGT (n = 293) and IGT (n = 238; 310 Japanese and 232 Mexican Americans) received an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) with measurement of plasma glucose, insulin, and C-peptide every 30 min. The insulin secretion rate was determined by plasma C-peptide deconvolution. Insulin sensitivity (Matsuda index) was measured from plasma insulin and glucose concentrations. The insulin secretion/insulin resistance (IS/IR) or disposition index was calculated as DeltaISR/DeltaG / IR. As FPG increased in NGT subjects, the IS/IR index declined exponentially over the range of FPG from 70 to 125 mg/dl. The relationship between the IS/IR index and FPG was best fit with the equation: 28.8 exp(-0.036 FPG). For every 28 mg/dl increase in FPG, the IS/IR index declined by 63%. A similar relationship between IS/IR index and FPG was observed in IGT. However, the decay constant was lower than in NGT. The IS/IR index for early-phase insulin secretion (0-30 min) was correlated with the increase in FPG in both NGT and IGT (r = -0.43, P < 0.0001 and r = -0.20, P = 0.001, respectively). However, the correlation between late-phase insulin secretion (60-120 min) and FPG was not significant. In conclusion, small increments in FPG, within the "normal" range, are associated with a marked decline in glucose-stimulated insulin secretion and the decrease in insulin secretion with increasing FPG is greater in subjects with NGT than IGT and primarily is due to a decline in early-phase insulin secretion.     

Impact of incretin hormones on beta-cell function in subjects with normal or impaired glucose tolerance

The mechanisms by which the enteroinsular axis influences beta-cell function have not been investigated in detail. We performed oral and isoglycemic intravenous (IV) glucose administration in subjects with normal (NGT; n = 11) or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT; n = 10), using C-peptide deconvolution to calculate insulin secretion rates and mathematical modeling to quantitate beta-cell function. The incretin effect was taken to be the ratio of oral to IV responses. In NGT, incretin-mediated insulin release [oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)/IV ratio = 1.59 +/- 0.18, P = 0.004] amounted to 18 +/- 2 nmol/m(2) (32 +/- 4% of oral response), and its time course matched that of total insulin secretion. The beta-cell glucose sensitivity (OGTT/IV ratio = 1.52 +/- 0.26, P = 0.02), rate sensitivity (response to glucose rate of change, OGTT/IV ratio = 2.22 +/- 0.37, P = 0.06), and glucose-independent potentiation were markedly higher with oral than IV glucose. In IGT, beta-cell glucose sensitivity (75 +/- 14 vs. 156 +/- 28 pmol.min(-1).m(-2).mM(-1) of NGT, P = 0.01) and potentiation were impaired on the OGTT. The incretin effect was not significantly different from NGT in terms of plasma glucagon-like peptide 1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide responses, total insulin secretion, and enhancement of beta-cell glucose sensitivity (OGTT/IV ratio = 1.73 +/- 0.24, P = NS vs. NGT). However, the time courses of incretin-mediated insulin secretion and potentiation were altered, with a predominance of glucose-induced vs. incretin-mediated stimulation. We conclude that, under physiological circumstances, incretin-mediated stimulation of insulin secretion results from an enhancement of all dynamic aspects of beta-cell function, particularly beta-cell glucose sensitivity. In IGT, beta-cell function is inherently impaired, whereas the incretin effect is only partially affected.     

Factors responsible for glucose intolerance in Japanese subjects with impaired fasting glucose.

Impaired fasting glucose (IFG) represents risk of development of diabetes (DM) and its complications. We investigated insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity in 403 IFG subjects divided into three levels of 2-hour postchallenge glucose (2-h PG) to clarify the factors responsible in the development of glucose intolerance in Japanese IFG. Nearly 60% of the subjects at annual medical check-up with FPG of 6.1-7.0 mmol/l at the first screening were diagnosed by 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) to have impaired glucose tolerance (IGT; FPG <7.0 mmol/l and 7.8 mmol/l <2-h PG <11.1 mmol/l) or DM (isolated postchallenge hyperglycemia (IPH); FPG <7.0 mmol/l and 11.1 mmol/l <2-h PG level). The primary factor in the decreased glucose tolerance was a decrease in early-phase insulin, with some contribution of increasing insulin resistance. In addition, IFG/IGT and IFG/IPH subjects showed a compensatory increase in basal insulin secretion sufficient to keep FPG levels within the non-diabetic range. IFG is composed of three different categories in basal, early-phase insulin secretion, and insulin sensitivity.     

Effect of Dexamethasone on Glucose Homeostasis In Normal and Prediabetic Subjects With A First-Degree Relative With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

ObjectiveTo determine the effect of a single 8-mg orally administered dose of dexamethasone or placebo on glucose and insulin homeostasis, during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) performed before and 24 hours after the administered dose.MethodsIn a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study, we conducted experiments in subjects with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) or prediabetes, all of whom had at least one first-degree relative with type 2 dia betes mellitus. Measures of glucose and insulin homeosta sis derived from an OGTT before and 24 hours after admin istration of dexamethasone or placebo were compared in 21 placebo-treated versus 23 dexamethasone-treated sub jects with NGT as well as in 23 placebo-treated versus 20 dexamethasone-treated subjects with prediabetes.ResultsBefore administration of dexamethasone or placebo, area under the curve (AUC) for glucose and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance were higher, and the Matsuda and disposition indices were lower, in the prediabetic versus the NGT group. In both NGT and prediabetic groups treated with dexamethasone, glu cose and insulin values at fasting and during OGTT were increased in comparison with placebo-treated groups at 24 hours (P = .001). Dexamethasone treatment in both study groups increased homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance and AUC glucose and decreased the Matsuda index (P = .001). No significant changes were observed in AUC insulin/AUC glucose or homeostasis model assess ment of beta-cell function after dexamethasone treatment in either the NGT or the prediabetic group. The disposition index decreased and was lowest in the prediabetic group after dexamethasone treatment.ConclusionIn a study population in which all sub jects had at least one first-degree relative with type 2 dia betes mellitus, those with prediabetes were more insulin resistant and had a lower disposition index than did sub jects with NGT. Subjects with prediabetes also had a pro nounced decrease in disposition index when challenged with a single 8-mg orally administered dose of dexametha sone. (Endocr Pract. 2012;18:855-863)     

Basal and dynamic proinsulin-insulin relationship to assess beta-cell function during OGTT in metabolic disorders

The fasting proinsulin-to-insulin ratio is a currently used marker of beta-cell dysfunction. This ratio is calculated at the basal condition, but its behavior in dynamic conditions, i.e., during glucose stimulation, could be more informative. Given the different kinetics of the peptides, a mathematical model was necessary to analyze the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) data of insulin, C-peptide, and proinsulin in 55 healthy (NGT), 30 impaired glucose-tolerant (IGT), and 31 type 2 diabetic (T2DM) subjects. The model provided for secretion and disappearance of the peptides and an index of beta-cell function under dynamic conditions. Total proinsulin secretion during the OGTT was not different (P > 0.053) among NGT (0.17 +/- 0.01 mmol/l in 3 h), IGT (0.22 +/- 0.02), and T2DM (0.21 +/- 0.02) subjects. The proinsulin-to-insulin molar ratio measured from basal samples was higher (P < 0.0001) in T2DM (0.39 +/- 0.05) than in NGT (0.14 +/- 0.01) and IGT (0.13 +/- 0.02) subjects, and similar results (P < 0.003) were found by the dynamic index (0.27 +/- 0.04, 0.14 +/- 0.01, 0.15 +/- 0.01 in T2DM, NGT, IGT subjects, respectively). The basal ratio significantly correlated with the dynamic index, and the regression line slope was lower than 1 (0.43 +/- 0.08, 0.61 +/- 0.10, and 0.56 +/- 0.03 in NGT, IGT, and T2DM subjects, respectively, P < 0.0001). Impaired beta-cell function in T2DM could then be indicated by proinsulin-to-insulin indexes at both basal and dynamic phases.     

Beta-cell dysfunctions and insulin resistance in subjects with increased risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus

The aim of this study was to test if a beta-cell defect is associated to deterioration of glucose tolerance early during the natural history of the type 2 diabetes mellitus . In 41 overweight women, with macrosomic infants in their antecedent deliveries, measures of insulin response and insulin sensitivity were derived from a short (45 min) iv glucose test. The early (EIR) and the late (LIR) phase insulin responses and the insulin sensitivity index (Si) were calculated. According the response to 75 g oral glucose test the subjects were divided into two groups: Imparired glucose tolerance (IGT;n = 12), and normal glucose tolerance (NGT; n = 29). EIR was reduced in IGT group (14.9 ± 3.6 vs 37.0 ± 4.0; p< 0.002). Glucose tolerance during oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), correlated inversly to EIR (r=-0.45; n=41; p< 0.01). A strong correlation of EIR to LIR (r=0.88; n = 41; p< 0.001) but no correlation between glucose tolerance and Si was found.     

Meal and oral glucose tests for assessment of beta -cell function: modeling analysis in normal subjects

We investigated beta-cell function and its relationship to insulin sensitivity in 17 normal volunteers. For insulin secretion (derived by C-peptide deconvolution), a mathematical model was applied to 24-h triple-meal tests (MT) as well as oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT); insulin sensitivity was assessed by the euglycemic insulin clamp technique. The beta-cell model featured a glucose concentration-insulin secretion dose response (characterized by secretion at 5 mM glucose and slope), a secretion component proportional to the glucose concentration derivative, and a time-dependent potentiation factor (modulating the dose response and accounting for effects of sustained hyperglycemia and incretins). The beta-cell dose-response functions estimated from the whole 24-h MT, the first 2 h of the MT, and the OGTT differed systematically, because a different potentiation factor was involved. In fact, potentiation was higher than average during meals (1.6 +/- 0.1-fold during the first meal) and had a different time course in the MT and OGTT. However, if potentiation was accounted for, the 24- and 2-h MT and the OGTT yielded similar dose responses, and most beta-cell function parameters were intercorrelated (r = 0.50-0.86, P < or = 0.05). The potentiation factor was found to be related to plasma glucose-dependent insulin-releasing polypeptide concentrations (r = 0.49, P < 0.0001). Among beta-cell function parameters, only insulin secretion at 5 mM glucose from MT correlated inversely with insulin sensitivity (24-h MT: r = -0.74, P < 0.001; 2-h MT: r = -0.52, P < 0.05), whereas the dose-response slope and the OGTT parameters did not. In nine other subjects, reproducibility of model parameters was evaluated from repeated MTs. Coefficients of variation were generally approximately 20%, but the derivative component was less reproducible. We conclude that our model for the multiple MT yields useful information on beta-cell function, particularly with regard to the role of potentiation. With cautious interpretation, a 2-h MT or a standard OGTT can be used as surrogates of 24-h tests in assessing spontaneous beta-cell function.     

Decreased Insulin Clearance in Individuals with Elevated 1-h Post-Load Plasma Glucose Levels

Reduced insulin clearance has been shown to predict the development of type 2 diabetes. Recently, it has been suggested that plasma glucose concentrations ≥8.6 mmol/l (155 mg/dl) at 1 h during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) can identify individuals at high risk for type 2 diabetes among those who have normal glucose tolerance (NGT 1 h-high). The aim of this study was to examine whether NGT 1 h-high have a decrease in insulin clearance, as compared with NGT individuals with 1-h post-load glucose <8.6 mmol/l (l (155 mg/dl, NGT 1 h-low). To this end, 438 non-diabetic White individuals were subjected to OGTT and euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp to evaluate insulin clearance and insulin sensitivity. As compared with NGT 1 h-low individuals, NGT 1 h-high had significantly higher 1-h and 2-h post-load plasma glucose and 2-h insulin levels as well as higher fasting glucose and insulin levels. NGT 1 h-high exhibited also a significant decrease in both insulin sensitivity (P<0.0001) and insulin clearance (P = 0.006) after adjusting for age, gender, adiposity measures, and insulin sensitivity. The differences in insulin clearance remained significant after adjustment for fasting glucose (P = 0.02) in addition to gender, age, and BMI. In univariate analyses adjusted for gender and age, insulin clearance was inversely correlated with body weight, body mass index, waist, fat mass, 1-h and 2-h post-load glucose levels, fasting, 1-h and 2-h post-load insulin levels, and insulin-stimulated glucose disposal. In conclusion, our data show that NGT 1 h-high have a reduction in insulin clearance as compared with NGT 1 h-low individuals; this suggests that impaired insulin clearance may contribute to sustained fasting and post-meal hyperinsulinemia.     

Thiazolidinediones improve beta-cell function in type 2 diabetic patients

Thiazolidinediones (TZDs) improve glycemic control and insulin sensitivity in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). There is growing evidence from in vivo and in vitro studies that TZDs improve pancreatic beta-cell function. The aim of this study was to determine whether TZD-induced improvement in glycemic control is associated with improved beta-cell function. We studied 11 normal glucose-tolerant and 53 T2DM subjects [age 53+/-2 yr; BMI 29.4+/-0.8 kg/m2; fasting plasma glucose (FPG) 10.3+/-0.4 mM; Hb A1c 8.2+/-0.3%]. Diabetic patients were randomized to receive placebo or TZD for 4 mo. Subjects received 1) 2-h OGTT with determination of plasma glucose, insulin, and C-peptide concentrations and 2) two-step euglycemic insulin (40 and 160 mU.m-2.min-1) clamp with [3-(3)H]glucose. T2DM patients were then randomized to receive 4 mo of treatment with pioglitazone (45 mg/day), rosiglitazone (8 mg/day), or placebo. Pioglitazone and rosiglitazone similarly improved FPG, mean plasma glucose during OGTT, Hb A1c, and insulin-mediated total body glucose disposal (Rd) and decreased mean plasma FFA during OGTT (all P<0.01, ANOVA). The insulin secretion/insulin resistance (disposition) index [DeltaISR(AUC)/Deltaglucose(AUC)/IR] was significantly improved in all TZD-treated groups: +1.8+/-0.7 (PIO+drug-na?ve diabetics), +0.7+/-0.3 (PIO+sulfonylurea-treated diabetics), and 0.7+/-0.2 (ROSI+sulfonylurea-withdrawn diabetics) vs. -0.2+/-0.3 in the two placebo groups (P<0.01, all TZDs vs. placebo, ANOVA). Improved insulin secretion correlated positively with increased body weight, fat mass, and Rd and inversely with decreased plasma glucose and FFA during the OGTT. In T2DM patients, TZD treatment leads to improved beta-cell function, which correlates strongly with improved glycemic control.     

Serum Chemerin Concentrations Associate with Beta-Cell Function,but Not with Insulin Resistance in Individuals with Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD)

The novel adipokine chemerin has been related to insulin-resistant states such as obesity and non alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). However, its association with insulin resistance and beta cell function remains controversial. The main objective was to examine whether serum chemerin levels associate with insulin sensitivity and beta cell function independently of body mass index (BMI), by studying consecutive outpatients of the hepatology clinics of a European university hospital. Individuals (n=196) with NAFLD were stratified into persons with normal glucose tolerance (NGT; n=110), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT; n=51) and type 2 diabetes (T2D; n=35) and the association between serum chemerin and measures of insulin sensitivity and beta cell function as assessed during fasting and during oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was measured. Our results showed that serum chemerin positively associated with BMI (P=0.0007) and C peptide during OGTT (P<0.004), but not with circulating glucose, insulin, lipids or liver enzymes (all P>0.18). No BMI independent relationships of chemerin with fasting and OGTT derived measures of insulin sensitivity were found (P>0.5). Chemerin associated positively with fasting beta cell function as well as the OGTT derived insulinogenic index IGI_cp and the adaptation index after adjustment for age, sex and BMI (P=0.002-0.007), and inversely with the insulin/C peptide ratio (P=0.007). Serum chemerin neither related to the insulinogenic index IGI_ins nor the disposition index. In conclusion, circulating chemerin is likely linked to enhanced beta cell function but not to insulin sensitivity in patients with NAFLD.     

Effects of pioglitazone and metformin on beta-cell function in nondiabetic subjects at high risk for type 2 diabetes

Thiazolidinediones (TZDs) and metformin decreased the incidence of diabetes in subjects at risk for developing diabetes and improved peripheral or hepatic insulin sensitivity, respectively. Whether they also directly improved beta-cell function is not clear. In vitro studies showed improved beta-cell function in response to TZDs and metformin; however, the effects of TZDs or metformin on beta-cell function in humans are still uncertain. We hypothesized that both TZDs and metformin directly affect beta-cell function. We evaluated beta-cell function and insulin sensitivity (S(I)) in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance or a history of gestational diabetes using oral and intravenous glucose tolerance tests in addition to the glucose-potentiated arginine stimulation test. In contrast to metformin, pioglitazone improved S(I), glucose tolerance, and insulin-independent glucose disposal [glucose effectiveness (S(G))]. Neither pioglitazone nor metformin significantly improved beta-cell compensation for insulin resistance [disposition index (DI)], but the change in DI significantly correlated with baseline S(I). Insulin secretion in response to arginine at maximally potentiating glucose levels (AIR(max)) tended to increase after metformin and to decrease after pioglitazone; however, when adjusted for S(I), the changes were not significant. Our results demonstrate that, in nondiabetic subjects at risk for diabetes, pioglitazone, but not metformin, significantly improved glucose tolerance by improving S(I) and S(G). We did not find any evidence that either pioglitazone or metformin improved beta-cell function. Improved beta-cell compensation was observed primarily in the subgroup of subjects that had the lowest S(I) at baseline.     

Impaired beta-cell compensation to dexamethasone-induced hyperglycemia in women with polycystic ovary syndrome

Deterioration in glucose tolerance occurs rapidly in women with polycystic ovary syndrone (PCOS), suggesting that pancreatic beta-cell dysfunction may supervene early. To determine whether the compensatory insulin secretory response to an increase in insulin resistance induced by the glucocorticoid dexamethasone differs in women with PCOS and control subjects, we studied 10 PCOS and 6 control subjects with normal glucose tolerance. An oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and a graded glucose infusion protocol were performed at baseline and after subjects took 2.0 mg of dexamethasone orally. Basal (Phi(b)), static (Phi(s)), dynamic (Phi(d)), and global (Phi) indexes of beta-cell sensitivity to glucose were derived. Insulin sensitivity (S(i)) was calculated using the minimal model; a disposition index (DI) was calculated as the product of S(i) and Phi. PCOS and control subjects had nearly identical fasting and 2-h glucose levels at baseline. Phi(b) was higher, although not significantly so, in the PCOS subjects. The Phi(d), Phi(s), and Phi indexes were 28, 19, and 20% higher, respectively, in PCOS subjects. The DI was significantly lower in PCOS (30.01 +/- 5.33 vs. 59.24 +/- 7.59) at baseline. After dexamethasone, control subjects averaged a 9% increase (to 131 +/- 12 mg/dl) in 2-h glucose levels; women with PCOS had a significantly greater 26% increase to 155 +/- 6 mg/dl. The C-peptide-to-glucose ratios on OGTT increased by 44% in control subjects and by only 15% in PCOS subjects. The accelerated deterioration in glucose tolerance in PCOS may result, in part, from a relative attenuation in the response of the beta-cell to the demand placed on it by factors exacerbating insulin resistance.     

Glucose Homeostatic Law: Insulin Clearance Predicts the Progression of Glucose Intolerance in Humans

Homeostatic control of blood glucose is regulated by a complex feedback loop between glucose and insulin, of which failure leads to diabetes mellitus. However, physiological and pathological nature of the feedback loop is not fully understood. We made a mathematical model of the feedback loop between glucose and insulin using time course of blood glucose and insulin during consecutive hyperglycemic and hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamps in 113 subjects with variety of glucose tolerance including normal glucose tolerance (NGT), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We analyzed the correlation of the parameters in the model with the progression of glucose intolerance and the conserved relationship between parameters. The model parameters of insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion significantly declined from NGT to IGT, and from IGT to T2DM, respectively, consistent with previous clinical observations. Importantly, insulin clearance, an insulin degradation rate, significantly declined from NGT, IGT to T2DM along the progression of glucose intolerance in the mathematical model. Insulin clearance was positively correlated with a product of insulin sensitivity and secretion assessed by the clamp analysis or determined with the mathematical model. Insulin clearance was correlated negatively with postprandial glucose at 2h after oral glucose tolerance test. We also inferred a square-law between the rate constant of insulin clearance and a product of rate constants of insulin sensitivity and secretion in the model, which is also conserved among NGT, IGT and T2DM subjects. Insulin clearance shows a conserved relationship with the capacity of glucose disposal among the NGT, IGT and T2DM subjects. The decrease of insulin clearance predicts the progression of glucose intolerance.     

Assessment of beta-cell function in humans, simultaneously with insulin sensitivity and hepatic extraction, from intravenous and oral glucose tests

Assessment of insulin secretion in humans under physiological conditions has been a challenge because of its complex interplay with insulin action and hepatic insulin extraction. The possibility of simultaneously assessing beta-cell function, insulin sensitivity, and hepatic insulin extraction under physiological conditions using a simple protocol is appealing, since it has the potential to provide novel insights regarding the regulation of fasting and postprandial glucose metabolism in diabetic and nondiabetic humans. In this Perspective, we review data indicating that an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) or a meal test is able to accomplish this goal when interpreted with the oral beta-cell minimal model. We begin by using the well-established intravenous minimal model to highlight how the oral minimal model was developed and how the oral assessment parallels that of an intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT). We also point out the unique aspects of both approaches in relation to their ability to assess different aspects of the beta-cell secretory cascade. We review the ability of the oral model to concurrently measure insulin sensitivity and hepatic insulin extraction, thereby enabling it to quantitatively portray the complex relationship among beta-cell function, hepatic insulin extraction, and insulin action. In addition, data from 204 individuals (54 young and 159 elderly) who underwent both IVGTT and meal tolerance tests are used to illustrate how these different approaches provide complementary but differing insights regarding the regulation of beta-cell function in humans.     

Liver fat, visceral adiposity, and sleep disturbances contribute to the development of insulin resistance and glucose intolerance in nondiabetic dialysis patients

Hemodialysis patients exhibit insulin resistance (IR) in target organs such as liver, muscles, and adipose tissue. The aim of this study was to identify contributors to IR and to develop a model for predicting glucose intolerance in nondiabetic hemodialysis patients. After a 2-h, 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), 34 hemodialysis patients were divided into groups with normal (NGT) and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). Indices of insulin sensitivity were derived from OGTT data. Measurements included liver and muscle fat infiltration and central adiposity by computed tomography scans, body composition by dual energy X-ray absorptiometer, sleep quality by full polysomnography, and functional capacity and quality of life (QoL) by a battery of exercise tests and questionnaires. Cut-off points, as well as sensitivity and specificity calculations were based on IR (insulin sensitivity index by Matsuda) using a receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curve analysis. Fifteen patients were assigned to the IGT, and 19 subjects to the NGT group. Intrahepatic fat content and visceral adiposity were significantly higher in the IGT group. IR indices strongly correlated with sleep disturbances, visceral adiposity, functional capacity, and QoL. Visceral adiposity, O2 desaturation during sleep, intrahepatic fat content, and QoL score fitted into the model for predicting glucose intolerance. A ROC curve analysis identified an intrahepatic fat content of > 3.97% (sensitivity, 100; specificity, 35.7) as the best cutoff point for predicting IR. Visceral and intrahepatic fat content, as well as QoL and sleep seemed to be involved at some point in the development of glucose intolerance in hemodialysis patients. Means of reducing fat depots in the liver and splachnic area might prove promising in combating IR and cardiovascular risk in hemodialysis patients.     

Elevated plasma nonesterified fatty acids are associated with deterioration of acute insulin response in IGT but not NGT

High concentrations of nonesterified fatty acids (NEFA) are a risk factor for developing type 2 diabetes in Pima Indians. In vitro and in vivo, chronic elevation of NEFA decreases glucose-stimulated insulin secretion. We hypothesized that high fasting plasma NEFA would increase the risk of type 2 diabetes by inducing a worsening of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in Pima Indians. To test this hypothesis, fasting plasma NEFA concentrations, body composition, insulin action (M), acute insulin response (AIR, 25-g IVGTT), and glucose tolerance (75-g OGTT) were measured in 151 Pima Indians [107 normal glucose tolerant (NGT), 44 impaired glucose tolerant (IGT)] at the initial visit. These subjects, participants in ongoing studies of the pathogenesis of obesity and type 2 diabetes, had follow-up measurements of body composition, glucose tolerance, M, and AIR. In NGT individuals, cross-sectionally, high fasting plasma NEFA concentrations at the initial visit were negatively associated with AIR after adjustment for age, sex, percent body fat, and M (P = 0.03). Longitudinally, high fasting plasma NEFA concentrations at the initial visit were not associated with change in AIR. In individuals with IGT, cross-sectionally, high fasting plasma NEFA concentrations at the initial visit were not associated with AIR. Longitudinally, high fasting plasma NEFA concentrations at the initial visit were associated with a decrease in AIR before (P < 0.0001) and after adjustment for sex, age at follow-up, time of follow-up, change in percent body fat and insulin sensitivity, and AIR at the initial visit (P = 0.0006). In conclusion, findings in people with NGT indicate that fasting plasma NEFA concentrations are not a primary etiologic factor for beta-cell failure. However, in subjects who have progressed to a state of IGT, chronically elevated NEFA seem to have a deleterious effect on insulin-secretory capacity.     

Effect of lowering postprandial hyperglycemia on insulin secretion in older people with impaired glucose tolerance

Glucose tolerance declines with age, resulting in a high prevalence of diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) in the older population. Hyperglycemia per se can lead to impaired beta-cell function (glucose toxicity). We tested the role of glucose toxicity in age-related beta-cell dysfunction in older people (65 +/- 8 yr) with IGT treated with the alpha-glucosidase inhibitor acarbose (n = 14) or placebo (n = 13) for 6 wk in a randomized, double-blind study. Baseline and posttreatment studies included 1) an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), 2) 1-h postprandial glucose monitoring, 3) a frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (insulin sensitivity, or S(I)), and 4) glucose ramp clamp (insulin secretion rates, or ISR), in which a variable glucose infusion increases plasma glucose from 5 to 10 mM. The treatment groups had similar baseline body mass index; fasting, 2-h OGTT, and 1-h postprandial glucose levels; and S(I). In these carefully matched older people with IGT, both fasting (5.7 +/- 0.2 vs. 6.3 +/- 0.2 mM, P = 0.002) and 1-h postprandial glucose levels (6.9 +/- 0.3 vs. 8.2 +/- 0.4 mM, P = 0.02) were significantly lower in the acarbose than in the placebo group. Despite this reduction of chronic hyperglycemia in the acarbose vs. placebo group, measures of insulin secretion (ISR area under the curve: 728 +/- 55 vs. 835 +/- 81 pmol/kg, P = 0.9) and acute insulin response to intravenous glucose (329 +/- 67 vs. 301 +/- 54 pM, P = 0.4) remained unchanged and impaired. Thus short-term improvement of chronic hyperglycemia does not reverse beta-cell dysfunction in older people with IGT.     

糖尿病不同发展阶段胰岛功能的变化趋势*

目的:研究糖尿病不同发展阶段胰岛素敏感性及胰岛素分泌功能的改变,指导2型糖尿病的早期诊断。方法:57例行OGTT体检者,分为NGT、IGT、IFG+IGT、新诊断T2DM四组,并行IVGTT,采用HOMA-IR评估胰岛素敏感性,采用葡萄糖处置指数[DI1=HOMA-β/HOMA-IR,DI2=ΔI30/ΔG30/HOMA-IR,DI3=MBCI×IAI,DI4=AIR0-10/HOMA-IR]及AUCINS/HOMA-IR评估胰岛素分泌功能。结果:IGT、IFG+IGT、新诊断T2DM组HOMA-IR无统计学差异(P>0.05),均显著高于NGT组(P<0.05)。IGT、IFG+IGT、新诊断T2DM组DI1逐步降低(P<0.05);NGT、IGT组DI1无统计学差异(P>0.05)。NGT、IGT、IFG+IGT、新诊断T2DM组DI2、DI3、DI4逐步降低(P<0.05)。IFG+IGT、新诊断T2DM组OGTTAUCINS/HOMA-IR逐步降低(P<0.05),且显著低于NGT组(P<0.05);NGT、IGT组OGTTAUCINS/HOMA-IR无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论:(1)IGT阶段胰岛素抵抗及胰岛素1相、早期相分泌功能的下降同时存在。IFG+IGT阶段胰岛素1相、早期相分泌进一步下降,并出现基础相、2相分泌的减少,胰岛素抵抗加重不明显。新诊断T2DM阶段胰岛素各相分泌进一步减少,胰岛素抵抗加重不明显。(2)在T2DM发生过程中,胰岛素分泌功能下降较胰岛素敏感性下降更为明显。(3)胰岛素抵抗及胰岛素1相、早期相分泌功能的下降是T2DM的预测因子。(4)IFG+IGT阶段应积极干预。     

Extremely short duration high intensity interval training substantially improves insulin action in young healthy males

Background

Impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) is a prediabetic state. If IGT can be prevented from progressing to overt diabetes, hyperglycemia-related complications can be avoided. The purpose of the present study was to examine whether pioglitazone (ACTOS^®) can prevent progression of IGT to type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in a prospective randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trial.

Methods/Design

602 IGT subjects were identified with OGTT (2-hour plasma glucose = 140–199 mg/dl). In addition, IGT subjects were required to have FPG = 95–125 mg/dl and at least one other high risk characteristic. Prior to randomization all subjects had measurement of ankle-arm blood pressure, systolic/diastolic blood pressure, HbA_1C, lipid profile and a subset had frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIVGTT), DEXA, and ultrasound determination of carotid intima-media thickness (IMT). Following this, subjects were randomized to receive pioglitazone (45 mg/day) or placebo, and returned every 2–3 months for FPG determination and annually for OGTT. Repeat carotid IMT measurement was performed at 18 months and study end. Recruitment took place over 24 months, and subjects were followed for an additional 24 months. At study end (48 months) or at time of diagnosis of diabetes the OGTT, FSIVGTT, DEXA, carotid IMT, and all other measurements were repeated. Primary endpoint is conversion of IGT to T2DM based upon FPG ≥ 126 or 2-hour PG ≥ 200 mg/dl. Secondary endpoints include whether pioglitazone can: (i) improve glycemic control (ii) enhance insulin sensitivity, (iii) augment beta cell function, (iv) improve risk factors for cardiovascular disease, (v) cause regression/slow progression of carotid IMT, (vi) revert newly diagnosed diabetes to normal glucose tolerance.

Conclusion

ACT NOW is designed to determine if pioglitazone can prevent/delay progression to diabetes in high risk IGT subjects, and to define the mechanisms (improved insulin sensitivity and/or enhanced beta cell function) via which pioglitazone exerts its beneficial effect on glucose metabolism to prevent/delay onset of T2DM.

Trial Registration

clinical trials.gov identifier: NCT00220961