Roles of charged residues of rotor and stator in flagellar rotation: comparative study using H+-driven and Na+-driven motors in Escherichia coli

In Escherichia coli, rotation of the flagellar motor has been shown to depend upon electrostatic interactions between charged residues of the stator protein MotA and the rotor protein FliG. These charged residues are conserved in the Na+-driven polar flagellum of Vibrio alginolyticus, but mutational studies in V. alginolyticus suggested that they are relatively unimportant for motor rotation. The electrostatic interactions detected in E. coli therefore might not be a general feature of flagellar motors, or, alternatively, the V. alginolyticus motor might rely on similar interactions but incorporate additional features that make it more robust against mutation. Here, we have carried out a comparative study of chimeric motors that were resident in E. coli but engineered to use V. alginolyticus stator components, rotor components, or both. Charged residues in the V. alginolyticus rotor and stator proteins were found to be essential for motor rotation when the proteins functioned in the setting of the E. coli motor. Patterns of synergism and suppression in rotor/stator double mutants indicate that the V. alginolyticus proteins interact in essentially the same way as their counterparts in E. coli. The robustness of the rotor-stator interface in V. alginolyticus is in part due to the presence of additional charged residues in PomA but appears mainly due to other factors, because an E. coli motor using both rotor and stator components from V. alginolyticus remained sensitive to mutation. Motor function in V. alginolyticus may be enhanced by the proteins MotX and MotY.     

The Vibrio motor proteins, MotX and MotY, are associated with the basal body of Na-driven flagella and required for stator formation

The four motor proteins PomA, PomB, MotX and MotY, which are believed to be stator proteins, are essential for motility by the Na(+)-driven flagella of Vibrio alginolyticus. When we purified the flagellar basal bodies, MotX and MotY were detected in the basal body, which is the supramolecular complex comprised of the rotor and the bushing, but PomA and PomB were not. By antibody labelling, MotX and MotY were detected around the LP ring. These results indicate that MotX and MotY associate with the basal body. The basal body had a new ring structure beneath the LP ring, which was named the T ring. This structure was changed or lost in the basal body from a DeltamotX or DeltamotY strain. The T ring probably comprises MotX and MotY. In the absence of MotX or MotY, we demonstrated that PomA and PomB were not localized to a cell pole. From the above results, we suggest that MotX and MotY of the T ring are involved in the incorporation and/or stabilization of the PomA/PomB complex in the motor.     

Ion-coupling determinants of Na+-driven and H+-driven flagellar motors

The bacterial flagellar motor is a tiny molecular machine that uses a transmembrane flux of H(+) or Na(+) ions to drive flagellar rotation. In proton-driven motors, the membrane proteins MotA and MotB interact via their transmembrane regions to form a proton channel. The sodium-driven motors that power the polar flagellum of Vibrio species contain homologs of MotA and MotB, called PomA and PomB. They require the unique proteins MotX and MotY. In this study, we investigated how ion selectivity is determined in proton and sodium motors. We found that Escherichia coli MotA/B restore motility in DeltapomAB Vibrio alginolyticus. Most hypermotile segregants isolated from this weakly motile strain contain mutations in motB. We constructed proteins in which segments of MotB were fused to complementary portions of PomB. A chimera joining the N terminus of PomB to the periplasmic C terminus of MotB (PotB7(E)) functioned with PomA as the stator of a sodium motor, with or without MotX/Y. This stator (PomA/PotB7(E)) supported sodium-driven motility in motA or motB E.coli cells, and the swimming speed was even higher than with the original stator of E.coli MotA/B. We conclude that the cytoplasmic and transmembrane domains of PomA/B are sufficient for sodium-driven motility. However, MotA expressed with a B subunit containing the N terminus of MotB fused to the periplasmic domain of PomB (MomB7(E)) supported sodium-driven motility in a MotX/Y-dependent fashion. Thus, although the periplasmic domain of PomB is not necessary for sodium-driven motility in a PomA/B motor, it can convert a MotA/B proton motor into a sodium motor.     

MotX and MotY,specific components of the sodium-driven flagellar motor,colocalize to the outer membrane in Vibrio alginolyticus

Rotation of the sodium-driven polar flagella of Vibrio alginolyticus requires four motor proteins: PomA, PomB, MotX and MotY. MotX and MotY, which are unique components of the sodium-driven motor of Vibrio, have been believed to be localized in the inner (cytoplasmic) membrane via their N-terminal hydrophobic segments. Here we show that MotX and MotY colocalize to the outer membrane. Both proteins, when expressed together, were detected in the outer membrane fraction separated by sucrose density gradient centrifugation. As mature MotX and MotY proteins do not have N-terminal hydrophobic segments, the N-termini of the primary translation products must have signal sequences that are removed upon translocation across the inner membrane. Moreover, MotX and MotY require each other for efficient localization to the outer membrane. Based on these lines of evidence, we propose that MotX and MotY form a complex in the outer membrane. This is the first case that describes motor proteins function in the outer membrane for flagellar rotation.     

Functional reconstitution of the Na(+)-driven polar flagellar motor component of Vibrio alginolyticus

The bacterial flagellar motor is a molecular machine that couples the influx of specific ions to the generation of the force necessary to drive rotation of the flagellar filament. Four integral membrane proteins, PomA, PomB, MotX, and MotY, have been suggested to be directly involved in torque generation of the Na(+)-driven polar flagellar motor of Vibrio alginolyticus. In the present study, we report the isolation of the functional component of the torque-generating unit. The purified protein complex appears to consist of PomA and PomB and contains neither MotX nor MotY. The PomA/B protein, reconstituted into proteoliposomes, catalyzed (22)Na(+) influx in response to a potassium diffusion potential. Sodium uptake was abolished by the presence of Li(+) ions and phenamil, a sodium channel blocker. This is the first demonstration of a purification and functional reconstitution of the bacterial flagellar motor component involved in torque generation. In addition, this study demonstrates that the Na(+)-driven motor component, PomA and PomB, forms the Na(+)-conducting channel.     

MotX and MotY Are Required for Flagellar Rotation in Shewanella oneidensis MR-1

The single polar flagellum of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 is powered by two different stator complexes, the sodium-dependent PomAB and the proton-driven MotAB. In addition, Shewanella harbors two genes with homology to motX and motY of Vibrio species. In Vibrio, the products of these genes are crucial for sodium-dependent flagellar rotation. Resequencing of S. oneidensis MR-1 motY revealed that the gene does not harbor an authentic frameshift as was originally reported. Mutational analysis demonstrated that both MotX and MotY are critical for flagellar rotation of S. oneidensis MR-1 for both sodium- and proton-dependent stator systems but do not affect assembly of the flagellar filament. Fluorescence tagging of MotX and MotY to mCherry revealed that both proteins localize to the flagellated cell pole depending on the presence of the basal flagellar structure. Functional localization of MotX requires MotY, whereas MotY localizes independently of MotX. In contrast to the case in Vibrio, neither protein is crucial for the recruitment of the PomAB or MotAB stator complexes to the flagellated cell pole, nor do they play a major role in the stator selection process. Thus, MotX and MotY are not exclusive features of sodium-dependent flagellar systems. Furthermore, MotX and MotY in Shewanella, and possibly also in other genera, must have functions beyond the recruitment of the stator complexes.Flagellum-mediated swimming motility is a widespread means of locomotion among bacteria. Flagella consist of protein filaments that are rotated at the filament''s base by a membrane-embedded motor (3, 39). Rotation is powered by electrochemical gradients across the cytoplasmic membrane. Thus far, two coupling ions, sodium ions and protons, have been described as energy sources for bacterial flagellar motors (4, 24, 48). Two major components confer the conversion of the ion flux into rotary motion. The first component forms a rotor-mounted ring-like structure at the base of the flagellar basal body and is referred to as the switch complex or the C ring; it is composed of the proteins FliG, FliM, and FliN. The second major component is the stator system, consisting of membrane-embedded stator complexes that surround the C ring (3). Each stator complex is composed of two subunits in a 4:2 stoichiometry. In Escherichia coli, MotA and MotB constitute the stator complex by forming a proton-specific ion channel; the Na⁺-dependent counterpart in Vibrio species consists of the orthologs PomA and PomB (1, 5, 49). MotA and PomA both have four transmembrane domains and are thought to interact with FliG via a cytoplasmic segment to generate torque (2, 50). Stator function is presumably made possible by a peptidoglycan-binding motif located at the C-terminal portion of MotB and PomB that anchors the stator complex to the cell wall (1, 8). In E. coli, at least 11 stator complexes can be synchronously involved in driving flagellar rotation (35). However, a single complex is sufficient for rotation of the filament (36, 40). Despite its tight attachment to the peptidoglycan, the stator ring system was found to form a surprisingly dynamic complex. It has been suggested that inactive precomplexes of the stators form a membrane-located pool before being activated upon incorporation into the stator ring system around the motor (13, 45). In E. coli, the turnover time of stator complexes can be as short as 30 s (21).In Vibrio species, two auxiliary proteins, designated MotX and MotY, are required for motor function of the Na⁺-driven polar flagellar system (22, 23, 28, 31). Recently, it was shown that the proteins associate with the flagellar basal body in Vibrio alginolyticus to form an additional structure, the T ring (42). MotX interacts with MotY and the PomAB stator complexes, and both proteins are thought to be crucial for the acquisition of the stators to the motor of the polar flagellum. (29, 30, 42). A MotY homolog is also associated with the proton-dependent motor system of the lateral flagella of V. alginolyticus that is induced under conditions of elevated viscosity (41).We recently showed that Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 uses two different stator systems to drive the rotation of its single polar flagellum, the Na⁺-dependent PomAB stator and the proton-driven MotAB stator. As suggested by genetic data, the MotAB stator has been acquired by lateral gene transfer, presumably in the process of adaptation from a marine to a freshwater environment (32). The two different stators are recruited to the motor in a way that depends on the sodium ion concentration in the medium. The Na⁺-dependent PomAB stator is present at the flagellated cell pole regardless of the sodium ion concentration, whereas the proton-dependent MotAB stator functionally localizes only under conditions of low sodium or in the absence of PomAB. It is still unclear how stator selection is achieved and whether additional proteins play a role in this process.Orthologs of motX and motY have been annotated in S. oneidensis MR-1. We thus hypothesized that MotX and MotY might play a role in stator selection in S. oneidensis MR-1. However, the originally published sequence of motY harbors a frameshift that would result in a drastically truncated protein lacking a functionally relevant putative peptidoglycan-binding domain at its C terminus (16, 18). This situation seemed inconsistent with a role for MotY in S. oneidensis MR-1.Here we describe a functional analysis of the MotX and MotY orthologs in S. oneidensis MR-1. We found that motY does not, in fact, contain a frameshift mutation, so that MotY is translated in its full-length form. Both MotX and MotY were essential for Na⁺-dependent and proton-dependent motility. Therefore, these proteins have a role in S. oneidensis MR-1 that differs from their function in Vibrio species. We also used fusions to the fluorescent protein mCherry for functional localization studies of MotX and MotY.     

Requirements for conversion of the Na(+)-driven flagellar motor of Vibrio cholerae to the H(+)-driven motor of Escherichia coli

Bacterial flagella are powered by a motor that converts a transmembrane electrochemical potential of either H(+) or Na(+) into mechanical work. In Escherichia coli, the MotA and MotB proteins form the stator and function in proton translocation, whereas the FliG protein is located on the rotor and is involved in flagellar assembly and torque generation. The sodium-driven polar flagella of Vibrio species contain homologs of MotA and MotB, called PomA and PomB, and also contain two other membrane proteins called MotX and MotY, which are essential for motor rotation and that might also function in ion conduction. Deletions in pomA, pomB, motX, or motY in Vibrio cholerae resulted in a nonmotile phenotype, whereas deletion of fliG gave a nonflagellate phenotype. fliG genes on plasmids complemented fliG-null strains of the parent species but not fliG-null strains of the other species. FliG-null strains were complemented by chimeric FliG proteins in which the C-terminal domain came from the other species, however, implying that the C-terminal part of FliG can function in conjunction with the ion-translocating components of either species. A V. cholerae strain deleted of pomA, pomB, motX, and motY became weakly motile when the E. coli motA and motB genes were introduced on a plasmid. Like E. coli, but unlike wild-type V. cholerae, motility of some V. cholerae strains containing the hybrid motor was inhibited by the protonophore carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone under neutral as well as alkaline conditions but not by the sodium motor-specific inhibitor phenamil. We conclude that the E. coli proton motor components MotA and MotB can function in place of the motor proteins of V. cholerae and that the hybrid motors are driven by the proton motive force.     

Cloning and characterization of motX, a Vibrio alginolyticus sodium-driven flagellar motor gene.

Four motor proteins, MotX, MotY, PomA, and PomB, have been identified as constituents of the Na(+)-driven flagellum of Vibrio species. In this study, the complete motX gene was cloned from Vibrio alginolyticus and shown to complement three mot mutations, motX94, motX115, and motX119, as well as a V. parahaemolyticus motX mutant. The motX94 mutant contains a frameshift at Val86 of MotX, while the motX115 and motX119 mutations comprise substitutions of Ala146 to Val and Gln 194 to amber, respectively. When MotX was overexpressed in Vibrio cells, the amount of MotY detected in the membrane fraction increased, and vice versa, suggesting that MotX and MotY mutually stabilize each other by interacting at the membrane level. When a plasmid containing the motX gene was introduced into motY mutants NMB117 (motY117) and VIO542 (motY542), the mutations were suppressed. In contrast, motY could not cause the recovery of any swarm-defective motX mutants studied. Considering the above evidence, we propose that MotX is more directly involved than MotY in the mechanical functioning of the Na(+)-type flagellar motor, and that MotY may stabilize MotX to support its interaction with other Mot proteins.     

Interactions of MotX with MotY and with the PomA/PomB sodium ion channel complex of the Vibrio alginolyticus polar flagellum

Rotation of the sodium ion-driven polar flagellum of Vibrio alginolyticus requires the inner membrane sodium ion channel complex PomA/PomB and the outer membrane components MotX and MotY. None of the detergents used in this study were able to solubilize MotX when it was expressed alone. However, when co-expressed with MotY, MotX was solubilized by some detergents. The change in the solubility of MotX suggests that MotY interacts with MotX. In agreement with this, a pull-down assay showed the association of MotY with MotX. Solubilized MotX and MotY eluted in the void volume from a gel-filtration column, suggesting that MotX and MotY form a large oligomeric structure(s). In the absence of MotY, MotX affected membrane localization of the PomA/PomB complex and of PomB alone but not of PomA alone, suggesting an interaction between MotX and PomB. We propose that MotX exhibits multiple interactions with the other motor components, first with MotY for its localization to the outer membrane and then with the PomA/PomB complex through PomB for the motor rotation.     

Coupling ion specificity of chimeras between H(+)- and Na(+)-driven motor proteins, MotB and PomB, in Vibrio polar flagella

We have shown that a hybrid motor consisting of proton-type Rhodobacter sphaeroides MotA and sodium-type VIBRIO: alginolyticus PomB, MotX and MotY, can work as a sodium-driven motor in VIBRIO: cells. In this study, we tried to substitute the B subunits, which contain a putative ion-binding site in the transmembrane region. Rhodobacter sphaeroides MotB did not work with either MotA or PomA in Vibrio cells. Therefore, we constructed chimeric proteins (MomB), which had N-terminal MotB and C-terminal PomB. MomB proteins, with the entire transmembrane region derived from the H(+)-type MotB, gave rise to an Na(+) motor with MotA. The other two MomB proteins, in which the junction sites were within the transmembrane region, also formed Na(+) motors with PomA, but were changed for Na(+) or Li(+) specificity. These results show that the channel part consisting of the transmembrane regions from the A and B subunits can interchange Na(+)- and H(+)-type subunits and this can affect the ion specificity. This is the first report to have changed the specificity of the coupling ions in a bacterial flagellar motor.     

Exchange of rotor components in functioning bacterial flagellar motor

The bacterial flagellar motor is a rotary motor driven by the electrochemical potential of a coupling ion. The interaction between a rotor and stator units is thought to generate torque. The overall structure of flagellar motor has been thought to be static, however, it was recently proved that stators are exchanged in a rotating motor. Understanding the dynamics of rotor components in functioning motor is important for the clarifying of working mechanism of bacterial flagellar motor. In this study, we focused on the dynamics and the turnover of rotor components in a functioning flagellar motor. Expression systems for GFP-FliN, FliM-GFP, and GFP-FliG were constructed, and each GFP-fusion was functionally incorporated into the flagellar motor. To investigate whether the rotor components are exchanged in a rotating motor, we performed fluorescence recovery after photobleaching experiments using total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy. After photobleaching, in a tethered cell producing GFP-FliN or FliM-GFP, the recovery of fluorescence at the rotational center was observed. However, in a cell producing GFP-FliG, no recovery of fluorescence was observed. The transition phase of fluorescence intensity after full or partially photobleaching allowed the turnover of FliN subunits to be calculated as 0.0007 s⁻¹, meaning that FliN would be exchanged in tens of minutes. These novel findings indicate that a bacterial flagellar motor is not a static structure even in functioning state. This is the first report for the exchange of rotor components in a functioning bacterial flagellar motor.     

细菌鞭毛马达——一种卓越的分子机器

鞭毛马达(flagellar motor)是一种分子旋转马达,它在细菌鞭毛的结构与功能中起着中心作用.鞭毛马达的结构已基本清楚,主要由Mot A、Mot B、Fli G、Fli M和Fli N 5种蛋白组成定子(stator)和转子(rotor),其驱动力来自于跨膜的H⁺或Na⁺流.目前对鞭毛马达的旋转动力学及旋转力矩产生机制已有初步的了解.鞭毛马达可作为研究分子旋转马达的理想模型,对其深入研究将有助于认识生物能量转化利用及细胞运动的机制并具有广泛的生物学意义.     

MotX, the channel component of the sodium-type flagellar motor.

Thrust for propulsion of flagellated bacteria is generated by rotation of a propeller, the flagellum. The power to drive the polar flagellar rotary motor of Vibrio parahaemolyticus is derived from the transmembrane potential of sodium ions. Force is generated by the motor on coupling of the movement of ions across the membrane to rotation of the flagellum. A gene, motX, encoding one component of the torque generator has been cloned and sequenced. The deduced protein sequence is 212 amino acids in length. MotX was localized to the membrane and shown to interact with MotY, which is the presumed stationary component of the motor. Overproduction of MotX, but not that of a nonfunctional mutant MotX, was lethal to Escherichia coli. The rate of lysis caused by induction of motX was proportional to the sodium ion concentration. Li+ and K+ substituted for Na+ to promote lysis, while Ca2+ did not enhance lysis. Protection from the lethal effects of induction of motX was afforded by the sodium channel blocker amiloride. The data suggest that MotX forms a sodium channel. The deduced protein sequence for MotX shows no homology to its ion-conducting counterpart in the proton-driven motor; however, in possessing only one hydrophobic domain, it resembles other channels formed by small proteins with single membrane-spanning domains.     

Hybrid Motor with H+- and Na+-Driven Components Can Rotate Vibrio Polar Flagella by Using Sodium Ions

The bacterial flagellar motor is a molecular machine that converts ion flux across the membrane into flagellar rotation. The coupling ion is either a proton or a sodium ion. The polar flagellar motor of the marine bacterium Vibrio alginolyticus is driven by sodium ions, and the four protein components, PomA, PomB, MotX, and MotY, are essential for motor function. Among them, PomA and PomB are similar to MotA and MotB of the proton-driven motors, respectively. PomA shows greatest similarity to MotA of the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides. MotA is composed of 253 amino acids, the same length as PomA, and 40% of its residues are identical to those of PomA. R. sphaeroides MotB has high similarity only to the transmembrane region of PomB. To examine whether the R. sphaeroides motor genes can function in place of the pomA and pomB genes of V. alginolyticus, we constructed plasmids including both motA and motB or motA alone and transformed them into missense and null pomA-paralyzed mutants of V. alginolyticus. The transformants from both strains showed restored motility, although the swimming speeds were low. On the other hand, pomB mutants were not restored to motility by any plasmid containing motA and/or motB. Next, we tested which ions (proton or sodium) coupled to the hybrid motor function. The motor did not work in sodium-free buffer and was inhibited by phenamil and amiloride, sodium motor-specific inhibitors, but not by a protonophore. Thus, we conclude that the proton motor component, MotA, of R. sphaeroides can generate torque by coupling with the sodium ion flux in place of PomA of V. alginolyticus.     

Motility Protein Complexes in the Bacterial Flagellar Motor

Among the many proteins needed for the assembly and function of bacterial flagella, only five have been suggested to be involved in torque generation. These are MotA, MotB, FliG, FliM and FliN. In this study, we have probed binding interactions among these proteins, by using protein fusions to glutathioneS-transferase or to oligo-histidine, in conjunction with co-isolation assays. The results show that FliG, FliM and FliN all bind to each other, and that each also self-associates. MotA and MotB also bind to each other, and MotA interacts, but only weakly, with FliG and FliM. Taken together with previous genetic, physiological and ultrastructural studies, these results provide strong support for the view that FliG, FliM and FliN function together in a complex on the rotor of the flagellar motor, whereas MotA and MotB form a distinct complex that functions as the stator. Torque generation in the flagellar motor is thus likely to involve interactions between these two protein complexes.     

Roles of the intramolecular disulfide bridge in MotX and MotY, the specific proteins for sodium-driven motors in Vibrio spp

The proteins PomA, PomB, MotX, and MotY are essential for the motor function of Na+-driven flagella in Vibrio spp. Both MotY and MotX have the two cysteine residues (one of which is in a conserved tetrapeptide [CQLV]) that are inferred to form an intramolecular disulfide bond. The cysteine mutants of MotY prevented the formation of an intramolecular disulfide bond, which is presumably important for protein stability. Disruption of the disulfide bridge in MotX by site-directed mutagenesis resulted in increased instability, which did not, however, affect the motility of the cells. These lines of evidence suggest that the intramolecular disulfide bonds are involved in the stability of both proteins, but only MotY requires the intramolecular bridge for proper function.     

Roles of charged residues in the C-terminal region of PomA, a stator component of the Na+-driven flagellar motor

Bacterial flagellar motors use specific ion gradients to drive their rotation. It has been suggested that the electrostatic interactions between charged residues of the stator and rotor proteins are important for rotation in Escherichia coli. Mutational studies have indicated that the Na(+)-driven motor of Vibrio alginolyticus may incorporate interactions similar to those of the E. coli motor, but the other electrostatic interactions between the rotor and stator proteins may occur in the Na(+)-driven motor. Thus, we investigated the C-terminal charged residues of the stator protein, PomA, in the Na(+)-driven motor. Three of eight charge-reversing mutations, PomA(K203E), PomA(R215E), and PomA(D220K), did not confer motility either with the motor of V. alginolyticus or with the Na(+)-driven chimeric motor of E. coli. Overproduction of the R215E and D220K mutant proteins but not overproduction of the K203E mutant protein impaired the motility of wild-type V. alginolyticus. The R207E mutant conferred motility with the motor of V. alginolyticus but not with the chimeric motor of E. coli. The motility with the E211K and R232E mutants was similar to that with wild-type PomA in V. alginolyticus but was greatly reduced in E. coli. Suppressor analysis suggested that R215 may participate in PomA-PomA interactions or PomA intramolecular interactions to form the stator complex.     

Assembly of motor proteins, PomA and PomB, in the Na+-driven stator of the flagellar motor

PomA and PomB are transmembrane proteins that form the stator complex in the sodium-driven flagellar motor of Vibrio alginolyticus and are believed to surround the rotor part of the flagellar motor. We constructed and observed green fluorescent protein (GFP) fusions of the stator proteins PomA and PomB in living cells to clarify how stator proteins are assembled and installed into the flagellar motor. We were able to demonstrate that GFP-PomA and GFP-PomB localized to a cell pole dependent on the presence of the polar flagellum. Localization of the GFP-fused stator proteins required their partner subunit, PomA or PomB, and the C-terminal domain of PomB, which has a peptidoglycan-binding motif. Each of the GFP-fused stator proteins was co-isolated with its partner subunit from detergent-solubilized membrane. From these lines of evidence, we have demonstrated that the stator proteins are incorporated into the flagellar motor as a PomA/PomB complex and are fixed to the cell wall via the C-terminal domain of PomB.     

CW and CCW Conformations of the E. coli Flagellar Motor C-Ring Evaluated by Fluorescence Anisotropy

The molecular cascade that controls switching of the direction of rotation of Escherichia coli flagellar motors is well known, but the conformational changes that allow the rotor to switch are still unclear. The signaling molecule CheY, when phosphorylated, binds to the C-ring at the base of the rotor, raising the probability that the motor spins clockwise. When the concentration of CheY-P is so low that the motor rotates exclusively counterclockwise (CCW), the C-ring recruits more monomers of FliM and tetramers of FliN, the proteins to which CheY-P binds, thus increasing the motor's sensitivity to CheY-P and allowing it to switch once again. Motors that rotate exclusively CCW have more FliM and FliN subunits in their C-rings than motors that rotate exclusively clockwise. How are the new subunits accommodated? Does the diameter of the C-ring increase, or do FliM and FliN get packed in a different pattern, keeping the overall diameter of the C-ring constant? Here, by measuring fluorescence anisotropy of yellow fluorescent protein-labeled motors, we show that the CCW C-rings accommodate more FliM monomers without changing the spacing between them, and more FliN monomers at the same time as increasing their effective spacing and/or changing their orientation within the tetrameric structure.     

Putative channel components for the fast-rotating sodium-driven flagellar motor of a marine bacterium.

The polar flagellum of Vibrio alginolyticus rotates remarkably fast (up to 1,700 revolutions per second) by using a motor driven by sodium ions. Two genes, motX and motY, for the sodium-driven flagellar motor have been identified in marine bacteria, Vibrio parahaemolyticus and V. alginolyticus. They have no similarity to the genes for proton-driven motors, motA and motB, whose products constitute a proton channel. MotX was proposed to be a component of a sodium channel. Here we identified additional sodium motor genes, pomA and pomB, in V. alginolyticus. Unexpectedly, PomA and PomB have similarities to MotA and MotB, respectively, especially in the predicted transmembrane regions. These results suggest that PomA and PomB may be sodium-conducting channel components of the sodium-driven motor and that the motor part consists of the products of at least four genes, pomA, pomB, motX, and motY. Furthermore, swimming speed was controlled by the expression level of the pomA gene, suggesting that newly synthesized PomA proteins, which are components of a force-generating unit, were successively integrated into the defective motor complexes. These findings imply that Na+-driven flagellar motors may have similar structure and function as proton-driven motors, but with some interesting differences as well, and it is possible to compare and study the coupling mechanisms of the sodium and proton ion flux for the force generation.