Replication factories

During S phase, DNA replication begins at numerous sites throughout the genome. Textbooks would have us believe that each replication fork tracks along the immobile DNA until it runs into the adjacent fork, but recent results question this view. Various studies show that replication forks are concentrated in immobile 'factory' units throughout the nucleus. Each factory contains as many as 40 different replication forks and associated polymerases. These findings suggest that newly synthesized DNA is extruded as each template moves like a conveyor through the factory.     

Concurrent Replication and Methylation at Mammalian Origins of Replication

Observations made with Escherichia coli have suggested that a lag between replication and methylation regulates initiation of replication. To address the question of whether a similar mechanism operates in mammalian cells, we have determined the temporal relationship between initiation of replication and methylation in mammalian cells both at a comprehensive level and at specific sites. First, newly synthesized DNA containing origins of replication was isolated from primate-transformed and primary cell lines (HeLa cells, primary human fibroblasts, African green monkey kidney fibroblasts [CV-1], and primary African green monkey kidney cells) by the nascent-strand extrusion method followed by sucrose gradient sedimentation. By a modified nearest-neighbor analysis, the levels of cytosine methylation residing in all four possible dinucleotide sequences of both nascent and genomic DNAs were determined. The levels of cytosine methylation observed in the nascent and genomic DNAs were equivalent, suggesting that DNA replication and methylation are concomitant events. Okazaki fragments were also demonstrated to be methylated, suggesting that the rapid kinetics of methylation is a feature of both the leading and the lagging strands of nascent DNA. However, in contrast to previous observations, neither nascent nor genomic DNA contained detectable levels of methylated cytosines at dinucleotide contexts other than CpG (i.e., CpA, CpC, and CpT are not methylated). The nearest-neighbor analysis also shows that cancer cell lines are hypermethylated in both nascent and genomic DNAs relative to the primary cell lines. The extent of methylation in nascent and genomic DNAs at specific sites was determined as well by bisulfite mapping of CpG sites at the lamin B2, c-myc, and β-globin origins of replication. The methylation patterns of genomic and nascent clones are the same, confirming the hypothesis that methylation occurs concurrently with replication. Interestingly, the c-myc origin was found to be unmethylated in all clones tested. These results show that, like genes, different origins of replication exhibit different patterns of methylation. In summary, our results demonstrate tight coordination of DNA methylation and replication, which is consistent with recent observations showing that DNA methyltransferase is associated with proliferating cell nuclear antigen in the replication fork.     

Replication Terminator Protein-Based Replication Fork-Arrest Systems in Various Bacillus Species

The replication terminator protein (RTP) of Bacillus subtilis interacts with its cognate DNA terminators to cause replication fork arrest, thereby ensuring that the forks approaching one another at the conclusion of a round of replication meet within a restricted terminus region. A similar situation exists in Escherichia coli, but it appears that the fork-arrest systems in these two organisms have evolved independently of one another. In the present work, RTP homologs in four species closely related to B. subtilis (B. atrophaeus, B. amyloliquefaciens, B. mojavensis, and B. vallismortis) have been identified and characterized. An RTP homolog could not be identified in another closely related species, B. licheniformis. The nucleotide and amino acid changes from B. subtilis among the four homologs are consistent with the recently established phylogenetic tree for these species. The GC contents of the rtp genes raise the possibility that these organisms arose within this branch of the tree by horizontal transfer into a common ancestor after their divergence from B. licheniformis. Only 5 amino acid residue positions were changed among the four homologs, despite an up to 17.2% change in the nucleotide sequence, a finding that highlights the importance of the precise folded structure to the functioning of RTP. The absence of any significant change in the proposed DNA-binding region of RTP emphasizes the importance of its high affinity for the DNA terminator in its functioning. By coincidence, the single change (E30K) found in the B. mojavensis RTP corresponds exactly to that purposefully introduced by others into B. subtilis RTP to implicate a crucial role for E30 in the fork-arrest mechanism. The natural occurrence of this variant is difficult to reconcile with such an implication, and it was shown directly that RTP.E30K functions normally in fork arrest in B. subtilis in vivo. Additional DNA terminators were identified in the new RTP homolog-containing strains, allowing the definition of a Bacillus terminator consensus and identification of two more terminators in the B. subtilis 168 genome sequence to bring the total to nine.     

Eukaryotic DNA Replication

Abstract

The past decade has witnessed an exciting evolution in our understanding of eukaryotic DNA replication at the molecular level. Progress has been particularly rapid within the last few years due to the convergence of research on a variety of cell types, from yeast to human, encompassing disciplines ranging from clinical immunology to the molecular biology of viruses. New eukaryotic DNA replicases and accessory proteins have been purified and characterized, and some have been cloned and sequenced. In vitro systems for the replication of viral DNA have been developed, allowing the identification and purification of several mammalian replication proteins. In this review we focus on DNA polymerases alpha and delta and the polymerase accessory proteins, their physical and functional properties, as well as their roles in eukaryotic DNA replication.     

Break-Induced DNA Replication

Recombination-dependent DNA replication, often called break-induced replication (BIR), was initially invoked to explain recombination events in bacteriophage but it has recently been recognized as a fundamentally important mechanism to repair double-strand chromosome breaks in eukaryotes. This mechanism appears to be critically important in the restarting of stalled and broken replication forks and in maintaining the integrity of eroded telomeres. Although BIR helps preserve genome integrity during replication, it also promotes genome instability by the production of loss of heterozygosity and the formation of nonreciprocal translocations, as well as in the generation of complex chromosomal rearrangements.The break-copy mode of recombination (as opposed to break-join), was initially proposed by Meselson and Weigle (1961). Break-copy recombination, now more commonly known as recombination-dependent DNA replication or break-induced replication (BIR), is believed to account for restarting replication at broken replication forks and may also play a central role in the maintenance of telomeres in the absence of telomerase. BIR has been studied in various model systems and has been invoked to explain chromosome rearrangements in humans. This review focuses primarily on mechanistic studies in Escherichia coli and its bacteriophages, T4 and λ, in the budding yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Kluyveromyces lactis and on apparently similar, but less well-documented, mechanisms in mammalian cells.Homology-dependent repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) occur by three major repair pathways (Pâques and Haber 1999) (Fig. 1). When both ends of the DNA share substantial homology with a donor template (a sister chromatid, a homologous chromosome, or an ectopically located segment), repair occurs almost exclusively by gene conversion (GC). If the DSB is flanked by direct repeats, then a second repair process, single-strand annealing (SSA), can occur as 5′ to 3′ resection of the DSB ends exposes complementary sequences that can anneal to each other and repair the break by the formation of a deletion. However, when only one DSB end shares homology with a donor sequence, repair occurs by BIR. There are two BIR pathways, one dependent on Rad51 recombinase and the other independent of Rad51.Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Three major repair pathways of homology-dependent recombination. Noncrossover (NCO) and crossover (CO) events are indicated. Black triangles represent resolution of Holliday junctions (HJs). Dashed lines represent new DNA synthesis. GC, gene conversion; SSA, single-strand annealing; BIR, break-induced replication.     

DNA Replication Origins

The onset of genomic DNA synthesis requires precise interactions of specialized initiator proteins with DNA at sites where the replication machinery can be loaded. These sites, defined as replication origins, are found at a few unique locations in all of the prokaryotic chromosomes examined so far. However, replication origins are dispersed among tens of thousands of loci in metazoan chromosomes, thereby raising questions regarding the role of specific nucleotide sequences and chromatin environment in origin selection and the mechanisms used by initiators to recognize replication origins. Close examination of bacterial and archaeal replication origins reveals an array of DNA sequence motifs that position individual initiator protein molecules and promote initiator oligomerization on origin DNA. Conversely, the need for specific recognition sequences in eukaryotic replication origins is relaxed. In fact, the primary rule for origin selection appears to be flexibility, a feature that is modulated either by structural elements or by epigenetic mechanisms at least partly linked to the organization of the genome for gene expression.Timely duplication of the genome is an essential step in the reproduction of any cell, and it is not surprising that chromosomal DNA synthesis is tightly regulated by mechanisms that determine precisely where and when new replication forks are assembled. The first model for a DNA synthesis regulatory circuit was described about 50 years ago (Jacob et al. 1963), based on the idea that an early, key step in building new replication forks was the binding of a chromosomally encoded initiator protein to specialized DNA regions, termed replication origins (Fig. 1). The number of replication origins in a genome is, for the most part, dependent on chromosome size. Bacterial and archaeal genomes, which usually consist of a small circular chromosome, frequently have a single replication origin (Barry and Bell 2006; Gao and Zhang 2007). In contrast, eukaryotic genomes contain significantly more origins, ranging from 400 in yeast to 30,000–50,000 in humans (Cvetic and Walter 2005; Méchali 2010), because timely duplication of their larger linear chromosomes requires establishment of replication forks at multiple locations. The interaction of origin DNA and initiator proteins (Fig. 1) ultimately results in the assembly of prereplicative complexes (pre-RCs), whose role is to load and activate the DNA helicases necessary to unwind DNA before replication (Remus and Diffley 2009; Kawakami and Katayama 2010). Following helicase-catalyzed DNA unwinding, replisomal proteins become associated with the single-stranded DNA, and new replication forks proceed bidirectionally along the genome until every region is duplicated (for review, see O’Donnell 2006; Masai et al. 2010).Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Revised versions of the replicon model for all domains of life. For cells of each domain type, trans-acting initiators recognize replication origins to assemble prereplicative complexes required to unwind the DNA and load DNA helicase. Eukaryotic initiators are preassembled into hexameric origin recognition complexes (ORCs) before interacting with DNA. In prokaryotes, single initiators (archaeal Orc1/Cdc6 or bacterial DnaA) bind to recognition sites and assemble into complexes on DNA. In all cases, the DNA helicases (MCMs or DnaB) are recruited to the origin and loaded onto single DNA strands. In bacteria, DNA-bending proteins, such as Fis or IHF, may modulate the assembly of pre-RC by bending the origin DNA. Two activities of DnaA are described in the figure. The larger version binds to recognition sites, and the smaller version represents DnaA required to assist DnaC in loading DnaB helicase on single-stranded DNA.Initiator proteins from all forms of life share structural similarities, including membership in the AAA⁺ family of proteins (ATPases associated with various cellular activities) (Duderstadt and Berger 2008; Wigley 2009) that are activated by ATP binding and inactivated by ATP hydrolysis (Duderstadt and Berger 2008; Duncker et al. 2009; Kawakami and Katayama 2010). Despite these similarities, initiators assemble into prereplicative complexes in two fundamentally different ways (Fig. 2). In prokaryotes, initiator monomers interact with the origin at multiple repeated DNA sequence motifs, and the arrangement of these motifs (see below) can direct assembly of oligomers that mediate strand separation (Erzberger et al. 2006; Rozgaja et al. 2011). In eukaryotes, a hexameric origin recognition complex (ORC) binds to replication origins and then recruit additional factors (as Cdc6 and Cdt1) that will themselves recruit the hexameric MCM2-7 DNA helicase to form a prereplicative complex (for review, see Diffley 2011). This process occurs during mitosis and along G₁ and is called “DNA replication licensing,” a crucial regulation of eukaryotic DNA replication (for review, see Blow and Gillespie 2008). Importantly, this complex is still inactive, and only a subset of these preassembled origins will be activated in S phase. This process is, therefore, fundamentally different from initiation of replication in bacteria. Moreover, because sequence specificity appears more relaxed in large eukaryotic genomes, prokaryotic mechanisms that regulate initiator–DNA site occupation must be replaced by alternative mechanisms, such as structural elements or the use of epigenetic factors.Open in a separate windowFigure 2.Functional elements in some well-studied prokaryotic replication origins. (A) Bacterial oriCs. The DNA elements described in the text are (arrows) DnaA recognition boxes or (boxes) DNA unwinding elements (DUEs). When recognition site affinities are known, colored arrows designate high- (K_d > 100 nm) and low- (K_d < 100 nm) affinity sites. (B) Archaeal oriCs. Arrows and boxes designate DNA elements as in A, but the initiator protein is Orc1/Cdc6 rather than DnaA. (Thick arrows) Long origin recognition boxes (ORBs); (thin arrows) shorter versions (miniORBs). Both ORBs and miniORBs are identified in Pyrococcus. DUEs are not yet well defined for Helicobacter or Sulfolobus genera and are not labeled in this figure.Here, we describe replication origins on prokaryotic and eukaryotic genomes below, with a particular focus on the attributes responsible for orderly initiator interactions and origin selection specificity, as well as on the shift from origin sequence-dependent regulation to epigenetic regulation. You are also referred to other related articles in this collection and several recent reviews covering the topics of DNA replication initiation in more detail (Méchali 2010; Beattie and Bell 2011; Blow et al. 2011; Bryant and Aves 2011; Ding and MacAlpine 2011; Dorn and Cook 2011; Kaguni 2011; Leonard and Grimwade 2011; Sequeira-Mendes and Gomez 2012).     

Recombination and Replication

The links between recombination and replication have been appreciated for decades and it is now generally accepted that these two fundamental aspects of DNA metabolism are inseparable: Homologous recombination is essential for completion of DNA replication and vice versa. This review focuses on the roles that recombination enzymes play in underpinning genome duplication, aiding replication fork movement in the face of the many replisome barriers that challenge genome stability. These links have many conserved features across all domains of life, reflecting the conserved nature of the substrate for these reactions, DNA.The interplay between replication and recombination is complex in terms of both mechanism and integration within DNA metabolism. At the heart of this interplay is the requirement for single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), the substrate for DNA-strand-exchange proteins, to initiate recombination (Cox 2007b; San Filippo et al. 2008). Whether, when, and where this ssDNA is generated determines the functional relationship between replication and recombination, a relationship that can operate in both directions. Homologous recombination enzymes are critical for successful completion of genome duplication (Kogoma 1997; Cox et al. 2000) but DNA replication also underpins homologous recombination, as discussed elsewhere in this collection. The links between recombination and replication are therefore intimate and one cannot be considered in isolation from the other. However, involvement of DNA-strand-exchange proteins, regardless of the metabolic context, comes with the unavoidable risk of genome rearrangements. This genome instability can occasionally increase evolutionary fitness but more frequently is deleterious to the viability of the individual.This review will focus on fundamental aspects of the links between replication and recombination enzymes rather than simply providing a list of known enzymes and reactions. The substrate, DNA, is identical in all of these reactions and this is reflected in the high mechanistic conservation of replication and recombination.     

Human Papillomavirus DNA Replication Compartments in a Transient DNA Replication System

Many DNA viruses replicate their genomes at nuclear foci in infected cells. Using indirect immunofluorescence in combination with fluorescence in situ hybridization, we colocalized the human papillomavirus (HPV) replicating proteins E1 and E2 and the replicating origin-containing plasmid to nuclear foci in transiently transfected cells. The host replication protein A (RP-A) was also colocalized to these foci. These nuclear structures were identified as active sites of viral DNA synthesis by bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) pulse-labeling. Unexpectedly, the great majority of RP-A and BrdU incorporation was found in these HPV replication domains. Furthermore, E1, E2, and RP-A were also colocalized to nuclear foci in the absence of an origin-containing plasmid. These observations suggest a spatial reorganization of the host DNA replication machinery upon HPV DNA replication or E1 and E2 expression. Alternatively, viral DNA replication might be targeted to host nuclear domains that are active during the late S phase, when such domains are limited in number. In a fraction of cells expressing E1 and E2, the promyelocytic leukemia protein, a component of nuclear domain 10 (ND10), was either partially or completely colocalized with E1 and E2. Since ND10 structures were recently hypothesized to be sites of bovine papillomavirus virion assembly, our observation suggests that HPV DNA amplification might be partially coupled to virion assembly.     

Replication of Damaged DNA

DNA damage is generated continually inside cells. In order to be able to replicate past damaged bases (translesion synthesis), the cell employs a series of specialised DNA polymerases, which singly or in combination, are able to bypass many different types of damage. The polymerases have similar structural domains to classical polymerases, but they have a more open structure to allow altered bases to fit into their active sites. Although not required for replication of undamaged DNA, some at least of these polymerases are located in replication factories. Emerging evidence suggests that the polymerase switch from replicative to translesion polymerases might be mediated by post-translational modifications.     

Helicase Activation and Establishment of Replication Forks at Chromosomal Origins of Replication

Many replication proteins assemble on the pre-RC-formed replication origins and constitute the pre-initiation complex (pre-IC). This complex formation facilitates the conversion of Mcm2–7 in the pre-RC to an active DNA helicase, the Cdc45–Mcm–GINS (CMG) complex. Two protein kinases, cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) and Dbf4-dependent kinase (DDK), work to complete the formation of the pre-IC. Each kinase is responsible for a distinct step of the process in yeast; Cdc45 associates with origins in a DDK-dependent manner, whereas the association of GINS with origins depends on CDK. These associations with origins also require specific initiation proteins: Sld3 for Cdc45; and Dpb11, Sld2, and Sld3 for GINS. Functional homologs of these proteins exist in metazoa, although pre-IC formation cannot be separated by requirement of DDK and CDK because of experimental limitations. Once the replicative helicase is activated, the origin DNA is unwound, and bidirectional replication forks are established.The main events at the initiation step of DNA replication are the unwinding of double-stranded DNA and subsequent recruitment of DNA polymerases, to start DNA synthesis. Eukaryotic cells require an active DNA helicase to unwind the origin DNA. The core components of the replicative helicase, Mcm2–7, are loaded as a head-to-head double hexamer connected via their amino-terminal rings (Evrin et al. 2009; Remus et al. 2009; Gambus et al. 2011) onto Orc-associated origins, to form the pre-RC in late M and G₁ phases (see Bell and Kaguni 2013). However, Mcm2–7 alone does not show DNA helicase activity at replication origins. After the formation of the pre-RC, other replication factors assemble on origins, and the pre-initiation complex (pre-IC) is formed. The pre-IC is defined as a complex formed just before the initiation of DNA replication (Zou and Stillman 1998); in yeast, it contains at least seven additional factors: Cdc45, GINS, Dpb11, Sld2, Sld3, Cdc45, and DNA polymerase ε (Pol ε) (Muramatsu et al. 2010). The formation of the pre-IC is a prerequisite for the activation of the Mcm2–7 helicase; two additional factors, Cdc45 and GINS, associate with Mcm2–7 and form a tight complex, the Cdc45–Mcm–GINS (CMG) complex (Gambus et al. 2006; Moyer et al. 2006). This reaction requires components of the pre-IC and two protein kinases, cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) and Dbf4-dependent kinase (DDK) (for reviews, see Labib 2010; Masai et al. 2010; Tanaka and Araki 2010). In this article, we summarize and discuss the manner via which the pre-IC is formed in yeasts and metazoa. Although there are some discrepancies, the process of formation of the pre-IC is conserved fairly well in these organisms.     

Replication in Drosophila chromosomes

DNA fibre autoradiography of highly polytenized nuclei in salivary glands of Drosophila nasuta larvae reveals two distinct types of active replicons. Type I replicons are longer (mean size=64 m), have a very high rate of fork migration (average rate=0.95 m/min) and generally occur in large arrays often extending over several thousand m. In contrast, the type II replicons are smaller (mean size= 20 m), slow replicating (average rate=0.07 m/min) and occur in short arrays containing only a few closely spaced active replicons. Evidence is presented that type I replicons are active in the early S and type II in the late S. Observations on autoradiographic labelling of partially lysed polytene chromosomes provide evidence for a lack of temporal and spatial agreement in the activation of origin points in homologous regions of the lateral polytene strands; these observations also suggest local variations in levels of polyteny within a chromosome. On the basis of this and other available information on replication in polytene chromosomes the possible roles of the two replicon types in the generation of the different ³H-thymidine labelling patterns of polytene chromosomes are discussed.We take pleasure in dedicating this paper to our inspiring teacher Prof. S.P. Ray Chaudhuri on his completing 75 years of fruitful life     

Replication in Drosophila chromosomes

The temporal order of replication of specific sites in polytene chromosomes from salivary glands and gastric caeca of Drosophila nasuta larvae was compared using ³H-thymidine autoradiography. Labelling of different cytological regions in segments of chromosome 2R (section 47 A to 49 C) and chromosome 3 (section 80 A to 82 C) was examined in detail in nuclei showing late S-period labelling (2 D and 1D types) in both cell types. The different labelling sites (22 on the 2R segment and 38 on the chromosome 3 segment) are cytologically similar in the two cell types. However, there are profound differences in the labelling frequencies of certain sites in polytene nuclei from salivary glands and gastric caeca during the late S-phase. This suggests that even though a comparable number of chromosomal replicating units operates in the two polytene cell types, the temporal order of completion of replication differs.