Neutralization Profiles of Primary Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Isolates in the Context of Coreceptor Usage

Most strains of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) which have only been carried in vitro in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (primary isolates) can be neutralized by antibodies, but their sensitivity to neutralization varies considerably. To study the parameters that contribute to the differential neutralization sensitivity of primary HIV-1 isolates, we developed a neutralization assay with a panel of genetically engineered cell lines (GHOST cells) that express CD4, one of eight chemokine receptors which function as HIV-1 coreceptors, and a Tat-dependent green fluorescent protein reporter cassette which permits the evaluation and quantitation of HIV-1 infection by flow cytometry. All 21 primary isolates from several clades could grow in the various GHOST cell lines, and their use of one or more coreceptors could easily be defined by flow cytometric analysis. Ten of these primary isolates, three that were CXCR4 (X4)-tropic, three that were CCR5 (R5)-tropic, and four that were dual- or polytropic were chosen for study of their sensitivity to neutralization by human monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies. Viruses from the X4-tropic category of viruses were first tested since they have generally been considered to be particularly neutralization sensitive. It was found that the X4-tropic virus group contained both neutralization-sensitive and neutralization-resistant viruses. Similar results were obtained with R5-tropic viruses and with dual- or polytropic viruses. Within each category of viruses, neutralization sensitivity and resistance could be observed. Therefore, sensitivity to neutralization appears to be the consequence of factors that influence the antibody-virus interaction and its sequelae rather than coreceptor usage. Neutralization of various viruses by the V3-specific monoclonal antibody, 447-52D, was shown to be dependent not only on the presence of the relevant epitope but also on its presentation. An epitope within the envelope of a particular virus is not sufficient to render a virus sensitive to neutralization by an antibody that recognizes that epitope. Moreover, conformation-dependent factors may overcome the need for absolute fidelity in the match between an antibody and its core epitope, permitting sufficient affinity between the viral envelope protein and the antibody to neutralize the virus. The studies indicate that the neutralization sensitivity of HIV-1 primary isolates is a consequence of the complex interaction between virus, antibody, and target cell.     

Antibody Neutralization-Resistant Primary Isolates of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1

Although typical primary isolates of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) are relatively neutralization resistant, three human monoclonal antibodies and a small number of HIV-1⁺ human sera that neutralize the majority of isolates have been described. The monoclonal antibodies (2G12, 2F5, and b12) represent specificities that a putative vaccine should aim to elicit, since in vitro neutralization has been correlated with protection against primary viruses in animal models. Furthermore, a neutralization escape mutant to one of the antibodies (b12) selected in vitro remains sensitive to neutralization by the other two (2G12 and 2F5) (H. Mo, L. Stamatatos, J. E. Ip, C. F. Barbas, P. W. H. I. Parren, D. R. Burton, J. P. Moore, and D. D. Ho, J. Virol. 71:6869–6874, 1997), supporting the notion that eliciting a combination of such specificities would be particularly advantageous. Here, however, we describe a small subset of viruses, mostly pediatric, which show a high level of neutralization resistance to all three human monoclonal antibodies and to two broadly neutralizing sera. Such viruses threaten antibody-based antiviral strategies, and the basis for their resistance should be explored.     

Env-Expressing Autologous T Lymphocytes Induce Neutralizing Antibody and Afford Marked Protection against Feline Immunodeficiency Virus

The envelope (Env) glycoproteins of HIV and other lentiviruses possess neutralization and other protective epitopes, yet all attempts to induce protective immunity using Env as the only immunogen have either failed or afforded minimal levels of protection. In a novel prime-boost approach, specific-pathogen-free cats were primed with a plasmid expressing Env of feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) and feline granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and then boosted with their own T lymphocytes transduced ex vivo to produce the same Env and interleukin 15 (3 × 10⁶ to 10 × 10⁶ viable cells/cat). After the boost, the vaccinees developed elevated immune responses, including virus-neutralizing antibodies (NA). Challenge with an ex vivo preparation of FIV readily infected all eight control cats (four mock vaccinated and four naïve) and produced a marked decline in the proportion of peripheral CD4 T cells. In contrast, five of seven vaccinees showed little or no traces of infection, and the remaining two had reduced viral loads and underwent no changes in proportions of CD4 T cells. Interestingly, the viral loads of the vaccinees were inversely correlated to the titers of NA. The findings support the concept that Env is a valuable immunogen but needs to be administered in a way that permits the expression of its full protective potential.Despite years of intense research, a truly protective AIDS vaccine is far away. Suboptimal immunogenicity, inadequate antigen presentation, and inappropriate immune system activation are believed to have contributed to these disappointing results. However, several lines of evidence suggest that the control or prevention of infection is possible. For example, despite repeated exposures, some individuals escape infection or delay disease progression after being infected (1, 14, 15). Furthermore, passively infused neutralizing antibodies (NA) (28, 42, 51) or endogenously expressed NA derivatives (29) have been shown to provide protection against intravenous simian immunodeficiency virus challenge. On the other hand, data from several vaccine experiments suggest that cellular immunity is an important factor for protection (6, 32). Therefore, while immune protection against human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and other lentiviruses appears feasible, the strategies for eliciting it remain elusive.Because of its crucial role in viral replication and infectivity, the HIV envelope (Env) is an attractive immunogen and has been included in nearly all vaccine formulations tested so far (28, 30, 31). Env surface (SU) and transmembrane glycoproteins (gp) are actively targeted by the immune system (9, 10, 47), and Env-specific antibodies and cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) are produced early in infection. The appearance of these effectors also coincides with the decline of viremia during the acute phase of infection (30, 32). Individuals who control HIV infection in the absence of antiretroviral therapy have Env-specific NA and CTL responses that are effective against a wide spectrum of viral strains (14, 23, 35, 52, 60). At least some of the potentially protective epitopes in Env appear to interact with the cellular receptors during viral entry and are therefore highly conserved among isolates (31, 33, 39, 63). However, these epitopes have complex secondary and tertiary structures and are only transiently exposed by the structural changes that occur during the interaction between Env and its receptors (10, 11, 28). As a consequence, these epitopes are usually concealed from the immune system, and this may explain, at least in part, why Env-based vaccines have failed to show protective efficacy. Indeed, data from previous studies suggested that protection may be most effectively triggered by nascent viral proteins (22, 28, 30, 48, 62).We have conducted a proof-of-concept study to evaluate whether presenting Env to the immune system in a manner as close as possible to what occurs in the context of a natural infection may confer some protective advantage. The study was carried out with feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV), a lentivirus similar to HIV that establishes persistent infections and causes an AIDS-like disease in domestic cats. As far as it is understood, FIV evades immune surveillance through mechanisms similar to those exploited by HIV, and attempts to develop an effective FIV vaccine have met with difficulties similar to those encountered with AIDS vaccines (25, 37, 66). In particular, attempts to use FIV Env as a protective immunogen have repeatedly failed (13, 38, 58). Here we report the result of one experiment in which specific-pathogen-free (SPF) cats primed with a DNA immunogen encoding FIV Env and feline granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and boosted with viable, autologous T lymphocytes ex vivo that were transduced to express Env and feline interleukin 15 (IL-15) showed a remarkable level of protection against challenge with ex vivo FIV. Consistent with recent findings indicating the importance of NA in controlling lentiviral infections (1, 59, 63), among the immunological parameters investigated, only the titers of NA correlated inversely with protection. Collectively, the findings support the notion that Env is a valuable vaccine immunogen but needs to be administered in a way that permits the expression of its full protective potential.     

Neutralization Sensitivity of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Primary Isolates to Antibodies and CD4-Based Reagents Is Independent of Coreceptor Usage

We have investigated whether the identity of the coreceptor (CCR5, CXCR4, or both) used by primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) isolates to enter CD4⁺ cells influences the sensitivity of these isolates to neutralization by monoclonal antibodies and CD4-based agents. Coreceptor usage was not an important determinant of neutralization titer for primary isolates in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. We also studied whether dualtropic primary isolates (able to use both CCR5 and CXCR4) were differentially sensitive to neutralization by the same antibodies when entering U87MG-CD4 cells stably expressing either CCR5 or CXCR4. Again, we found that the coreceptor used by a virus did not greatly affect its neutralization sensitivity. Similar results were obtained for CCR5- or CXCR4-expressing HOS cell lines engineered to express green fluorescent protein as a reporter of HIV-1 entry. Neutralizing antibodies are therefore unlikely to be the major selection pressure which drives the phenotypic evolution (change in coreceptor usage) of HIV-1 that can occur in vivo. In addition, the increase in neutralization sensitivity found when primary isolates adapt to growth in transformed cell lines in vitro has little to do with alterations in coreceptor usage.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) enters CD4⁺ T cells via an interaction with CD4 and coreceptor molecules, the most important of which yet identified are the chemokine receptors CXCR4 and CCR5 (4, 12, 23, 26, 28, 32). CXCR4 is used by T-cell line-tropic (T-tropic) primary isolates or T-cell line-adapted (TCLA) lab strains, whereas CCR5 is used by primary isolates of the macrophage-tropic (M-tropic) phenotype (4, 12, 23, 26, 28, 32). Most T-tropic isolates and some TCLA strains are actually dualtropic in that they can use both CXCR4 and CCR5 (and often other coreceptors such as CCR3, Bonzo/STRL33, and BOB/gpr15), at least in coreceptor-transfected cells (18, 24, 30, 54, 89). The M-tropic and T-tropic/dualtropic nomenclature has often been used interchangeably with the terms “non-syncytium-inducing” (NSI) and “syncytium-inducing” (SI), although it is semantically imprecise to do so.M-tropic viruses are those most commonly transmitted sexually (3, 33, 87, 106) and from mother to infant (2, 72, 81). If T-tropic strains are transmitted, or when they emerge, this is associated with a more rapid course of disease in both adults (17, 37, 46, 51, 52, 76, 78, 82, 92, 101) and children (6, 45, 84, 90). However, T-tropic viruses emerge in only about 40% of infected people, usually only several years after infection (76, 78). A well-documented, albeit anecdotal, study found that when a T-tropic strain was transmitted by direct transfer of blood, its replication was rapidly suppressed: the T-tropic virus was eliminated from the body, and M-tropic strains predominated (20). These results suggest that there is a counterselection pressure against the emergence of T-tropic strains during the early stages of HIV-1 infection in most people. But what is this pressure?Since the M-tropic and T-tropic phenotypes are properties mediated by the envelope glycoproteins whose function is to associate with CD4 and the coreceptors, a selection pressure differentially exerted on M- and T-tropic viruses could, in principle, act at the level of virus entry. In other words, neutralizing antibodies to the envelope glycoproteins, or the chemokine ligands of the coreceptors, could theoretically interfere more potently with the interactions of T-tropic strains with CXCR4 than with M-tropic viruses and CCR5. A differential effect of this nature could suppress the emergence of T-tropic viruses. Consistent with this possibility, neutralizing antibodies are capable of preventing the CD4-dependent association of gp120 with CCR5 (42, 94, 103), and chemokines can also prevent the coreceptor interactions of HIV-1 (8, 13, 23, 28, 70).Here, we explore whether the efficiency of HIV-1 neutralization is affected by coreceptor usage. Although earlier studies have not found T-tropic strains to be inherently more neutralization sensitive than M-tropic ones (20, 40, 44), previously available reagents and techniques may not have been adequate to fully address this question. One major problem is that even single residue changes can drastically affect both antibody binding to neutralization epitopes and the HIV-1 phenotype (25, 55, 62, 67, 83, 91), and so studies using relatively unrelated viruses and a fixed antibody (polyclonal or monoclonal) preparation have two variables to contend with: the viral phenotype (coreceptor use) and the antigenic structure of the virus and hence the efficiency of the antibody-virion interaction.We have used a new experimental strategy to explore whether coreceptor usage affects neutralization sensitivity in the absence of other confounding variables: the use of dualtropic viruses able to enter CD4⁺ cells via either CCR5 or CXCR4. By using a constant HIV-1 isolate or clone and the same monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) or CD4-based reagents as neutralizing agents, we can ensure that the only variable under study in the neutralization reaction is the nature of the coreceptor used for entry. Our major conclusion is that there is no strong association between coreceptor usage and neutralization sensitivity for primary HIV-1 isolates. Independent studies have reached the same conclusion (53a, 59). The emergence of T-tropic (SI) viruses in vivo may be unlikely to be due to escape from antibody-mediated selection pressure.     

Vaccine Protection against a Heterologous, Non-Syncytium-Inducing, Primary Human Immunodeficiency Virus

Vaccine-induced protection of chimpanzees against laboratory-adapted and syncytium-inducing, multiply passaged primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) isolates, but not against non-syncytium-inducing, minimally passaged ones, has been demonstrated. Following challenge with such an isolate, HIV-1₅₀₁₆, we obtained complete protection in one of three chimpanzees previously protected against low- and high-dose HIV-1_SF2 exposures after immunization with an adenovirus-HIV-1_MN gp160 priming–HIV-1_SF2 gp120 boosting regimen. At challenge, the protected chimpanzee exhibited broad humoral immunity, including neutralizing antibody activity. These results demonstrate the potential of this combination vaccine strategy and suggest that vaccine protection against an HIV isolate relevant to infection of people is feasible.     

CXCR4 Is Required by a Nonprimate Lentivirus: Heterologous Expression of Feline Immunodeficiency Virus in Human, Rodent, and Feline Cells

A heterologous feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) expression system permitted high-level expression of FIV proteins and efficient production of infectious FIV in human cells. These results identify the FIV U3 element as the sole restriction to the productive phase of replication in nonfeline cells. Heterologous FIV expression in a variety of human cell lines resulted in profuse syncytial lysis that was FIV env specific, CD4 independent, and restricted to cells that express CXCR4, the coreceptor for T-cell-line-adapted strains of human immunodeficiency virus. Stable expression of human CXCR4 in CXCR4-negative human and rodent cell lines resulted in extensive FIV Env-mediated, CXCR4-dependent cell fusion and infection. In feline cells, stable overexpression of human CXCR4 resulted in increased FIV infectivity and marked syncytium formation during FIV replication or after infection with FIV Env-expressing vectors. The use of CXCR4 is a fundamental feature of lentivirus biology independent of CD4 and a shared cellular link to infection and cytopathicity for distantly related lentiviruses that cause AIDS. Their conserved use implicates chemokine receptors as primordial lentivirus receptors.     

Chemokine Coreceptor Usage by Diverse Primary Isolates of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1

We tested chemokine receptor subset usage by diverse, well-characterized primary viruses isolated from peripheral blood by monitoring viral replication with CCR1, CCR2b, CCR3, CCR5, and CXCR4 U87MG.CD4 transformed cell lines and STRL33/BONZO/TYMSTR and GPR15/BOB HOS.CD4 transformed cell lines. Primary viruses were isolated from 79 men with confirmed human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection from the Chicago component of the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study at interval time points. Thirty-five additional well-characterized primary viruses representing HIV-1 group M subtypes A, B, C, D, and E and group O and three primary simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) isolates were also used for these studies. The restricted use of the CCR5 chemokine receptor for viral entry was associated with infection by a virus having a non-syncytium-inducing phenotype and correlated with a reduced rate of disease progression and a prolonged disease-free interval. Conversely, broadening chemokine receptor usage from CCR5 to both CCR5 and CXCR4 was associated with infection by a virus having a syncytium-inducing phenotype and correlated with a faster rate of CD4 T-cell decline and progression of disease. We also observed a greater tendency for infection with a virus having a syncytium-inducing phenotype in men heterozygous for the defective CCR5 Δ32 allele (25%) than in those men homozygous for the wild-type CCR5 allele (6%) (P = 0.03). The propensity for infection with a virus having a syncytium-inducing phenotype provides a partial explanation for the rapid disease progression among some men heterozygous for the defective CCR5 Δ32 allele. Furthermore, we did not identify any primary viruses that used CCR3 as an entry cofactor, despite this CC chemokine receptor being expressed on the cell surface at a level commensurate with or higher than that observed for primary peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Whereas isolates of primary viruses of SIV also used STRL33/BONZO/TYMSTR and GPR15/BOB, no primary isolates of HIV-1 used these particular chemokine receptor-like orphan molecules as entry cofactors, suggesting a limited contribution of these other chemokine receptors to viral evolution. Thus, despite the number of chemokine receptors implicated in viral entry, CCR5 and CXCR4 are likely to be the physiologically relevant chemokine receptors used as entry cofactors in vivo by diverse strains of primary viruses isolated from blood.     

A Cell Line-Based Neutralization Assay for Primary Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Isolates That Use either the CCR5 or the CXCR4 Coreceptor

We describe here a cell line-based assay for the evaluation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) neutralization. The assay is based on CEM.NKR cells, transfected to express the HIV-1 coreceptor CCR5 to supplement the endogenous expression of CD4 and the CXCR4 coreceptor. The resulting CEM.NKR-CCR5 cells efficiently replicate primary HIV-1 isolates of both R5 and X4 phenotypes. A comparison of the CEM.NKR-CCR5 cells with mitogen-activated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) in neutralization assays with sera from HIV-1-infected individuals or specific anti-HIV-1 monoclonal antibodies shows that the sensitivity of HIV-1 neutralization is similar in the two cell types. The CEM.NKR-CCR5 cell assay, however, is more convenient to perform and eliminates the donor-to-donor variation in HIV-1 replication efficiency, which is one of the principal drawbacks of the PBMC-based neutralization assay. We suggest that this new assay is suitable for the general measurement of HIV-1 neutralization by antibodies.     

Coreceptor Utilization by Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Is Not a Primary Determinant of Neutralization Sensitivity

We have examined the relationship between coreceptor utilization and sensitivity to neutralization in a primary isolate of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and its T-cell line-adapted (TCLA) derivative. We determined that adaptation of the primary-isolate (PI) virus 168P results in the loss of the unique capacity of PI viruses to utilize the CCR5 coreceptor and in the acquisition by the TCLA 168C virus of sensitivity to neutralization by V3-directed monoclonal antibodies (MAbs). In experiments wherein infection by 168P is directed via either the CCR5 or the CXCR4 pathway, we demonstrate that the virus, as well as pseudotyped virions bearing a molecularly cloned 168P envelope protein, remains refractory to neutralization by MAbs 257-D, 268-D, and 50.1 regardless of the coreceptor utilized. This study suggests that coreceptor utilization is not a primary determinant of differential neutralization sensitivity in PI and TCLA viruses.Although CD4 had long been recognized as the cellular receptor to which the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV) envelope protein binds (9, 21, 22), it had also been recognized that expression of CD4 alone is insufficient to render nonhuman cells susceptible to HIV infection (4, 5, 22). Similarly, different HIV isolates display different abilities to infect CD4-positive human macrophages, T lymphocytes, and established T-cell lines (31, 32, 35), suggesting that additional molecules may be responsible for cell tropism specificity. During the past year, cellular molecules that act in conjunction with CD4 have been identified as required cofactors for HIV envelope protein-mediated binding and entry (1, 6, 10–12, 14). These HIV coreceptors are members of the superfamily of seven-transmembrane segment G-protein-coupled receptors and act primarily as cellular receptors for chemokines.The discovery of cellular coreceptors for HIV has provided new perspectives for understanding these early events in HIV infection (see review in reference 2). Thus, phenotypically distinct isolates of HIV utilize as coreceptors different chemokine receptor molecules. Although all primary isolates of HIV infect primary T lymphocytes, some also infect cells of the macrophage lineage (31, 32). These monocyteropic isolates utilize the CCR5 chemokine receptor, whose natural ligands include the chemokines RANTES, MIP-1α, and MIP-1β (1, 6, 10–12). Monocytropic isolates do not induce syncytia in primary lymphocyte culture and do not infect established T-cell lines (31). During the late course of HIV infection, syncytium-inducing (SI) primary viruses often arise from the population of monocytropic viruses (31, 32). These SI primary isolates no longer infect macrophages, and they utilize both CCR5 and another chemokine receptor, CXCR4 (7, 33, 38). CXCR4, whose natural chemokine ligand is SDF-1 (3, 27), was originally identified by Feng et al. as the cofactor used by laboratory-adapted viruses (14). In fact, the common laboratory viruses (IIIb/LAI, LAV, and RF) are unable to utilize CCR5 coreceptor (1, 6, 10–12), presumably reflecting the lack of CCR5 expression in most established T-cell lines (1, 13). Although some primary isolates utilize additional chemokine receptor molecules, notably CCR3 and CCR2b (6, 11, 18), the relationship between these coreceptors and viral phenotypes is less clear. The ability to utilize CCR5 coreceptor, however, is unique to primary-isolate (PI) viruses.Paralleling these differences in coreceptor utilization and cell tropism are differences in sensitivity to virus neutralization. Although laboratory-adapted isolates of HIV can be potently neutralized by sera elicited by recombinant gp120 (rgp120) protein, primary isolates are largely refractory to neutralization by rgp120 vaccine sera (23, 37). Similarly, PI viruses are significantly more resistant than T-cell line-adapted (TCLA) viruses to neutralization by gp120-directed monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) (25, 37) and to inhibition by soluble forms of CD4 (8). We and others have demonstrated that neutralization sensitivity develops concomitantly with adaptation of primary isolates to persistent growth in established T-cell lines (24, 37). By studying pedigreed PI and TCLA viruses (168P and 168C, respectively), we have shown that adaptation renders the TCLA virus sensitive not only to rgp120 vaccine sera and CD4 immunoadhesin but also to MAbs directed to the V3 loop of gp120 (37). However, the basis for this increase in neutralization sensitivity remains unclear.In this report, we explore the relationship between neutralization sensitivity and coreceptor utilization, especially with regard to changes that accompany adaptation. We examined neutralization sensitivity of the well-characterized SI primary isolate 168P under experimental conditions where infection can be directed via either the CXCR4 or the CCR5 pathway. The pedigreed TCLA derivative 168C utilizes only CXCR4 and was sensitive to neutralization by the panel of V3-directed MAbs used in these assays. However, the primary isolate 168P remained refractory to neutralization regardless of coreceptor pathway taken. Our findings suggest that envelope protein structure, and not coreceptor utilization, is the primary determinant of differential neutralization sensitivity in PI and TCLA viruses.

Coreceptor utilization by pedigreed PI and TCLA viruses.

Cross-sectional surveys of coreceptor use have shown that primary SI isolates generally utilize CXCR4 and CCR5 coreceptors, whereas unrelated laboratory-adapted isolates utilize only CXCR4 (1, 6, 7, 10–12, 14, 33, 38). We wished to confirm this trend in a longitudinal study of adaptation. We previously described the adaptation of the SI primary isolate 168P to persistent growth in the FDA/H9 T-cell line and the concomitant development of neutralization sensitivity in the resulting TCLA virus 168C (37). In the present study, the ability of these pedigreed viruses to utilize specific coreceptors was tested by infection of U87 human glioma cell lines expressing CD4 (U87-CD4) and the specific coreceptor (19).For this assay, virus stocks were prepared from cell culture supernatants of phytohemagglutinin (PHA)-stimulated peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) (168P) or FDA/H9 cells (168C) and standardized to yield a submaximal number of foci of infection on U87-CD4-CXCR4 cells (approximately 100 to 200 foci/96-well microplate culture). To confirm coreceptor specificity, in some assays CCR5 chemokines (each at 500 ng/ml) were added to cells 1 h prior to infection. After 2 days of incubation, cell monolayers were fixed with methanol-acetone and immunochemically stained with HIV immunoglobulin (HIVIG) (29), anti-human ABC kit (Biomeda Corp.), and diaminobenzidine substrate.Figure ​Figure11 confirms the ability of the SI 168P virus to utilize both CXCR4 and CCR5 and the subsequent loss of this latter specificity in the 168C TCLA virus. Infection was dependent on coreceptor expression, and both PI and TCLA viruses could also utilize CCR3 (data not presented). Open in a separate windowFIG. 1Coreceptor utilization by pedigreed PI and TCLA 168 viruses. U87-CD4 cell lines expressing CXCR4 (▪) or CCR5 () were used to define the ability of 168P and 168C viruses to utilize the respective coreceptor. CCR5 utilization was further tested by the addition to U87-CD4-CCR5 cells of CCR5-specific chemokines (RANTES, MIP-1α, and MIP-1β; R&D Systems) (□). For details, see text. ∗, no foci were observed.In keeping with the determined coreceptor specificity, infection could be blocked by addition of coreceptor-specific ligands. Thus, 168P virus infection of CCR5-expressing cells was blocked by the CCR5-specific ligands RANTES, MIP-1α, and MIP-1β (1, 6, 10–12) (Fig. ​(Fig.1).1). Similarly, infection of CXCR4-expressing U87-CD4 cells by either virus could be blocked by the CXCR4-specific chemokine ligand SDF-1 (3, 27) (data not presented).

Coreceptor pathway and neutralization sensitivity.

In previous work, we demonstrated that the PI 168P virus is refractory to neutralization by HIV MN gp120 vaccine sera and by several well-characterized V3-directed murine MAbs which strongly neutralize infectivity of the TCLA 168C virus (37). In the present study, we extended the panel of MAbs to include two V3-directed human MAbs, 257-D and 268-D (17). These well-characterized human MAbs recognize core epitopes at the crown of the V3 loop of gp120 (KRIHI and HIGPGR, respectively), linear sequences known to be present in both 168P and 168C envelope proteins (37). These epitope predictions were confirmed by gp120 capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (26) which demonstrated equal binding to envelope protein in detergent-solubilized 168P and 168C virions (data not presented). Sensitivity to neutralization by these human MAbs was determined in a standard assay using PHA-activated PBLs (37). MAbs 257-D and 268-D were found to potently neutralize 168C but fail to neutralize 168P (Fig. ​(Fig.2).2). This pattern of neutralization sensitivity is similar to that previously described for the V3-directed murine MAb 50.1 (30, 36, 37). Open in a separate windowFIG. 2Neutralization sensitivity of 168 viruses in PBL culture. Virus neutralization assays in PHA-stimulated PBL culture were performed as previously described (37). 168P (○, •) and 168C (□, ▪) virus stocks were standardized to yield submaximal extents of virus spread during the 5-day infection. CCR5-specific chemokines (•, ▪) were added as described for Fig. ​Fig.1.1. The V3-directed MAbs are indicated. p24 antigen was determined by p24 antigen capture ELISA (SAIC Frederick) and was normalized to infected cell control values (168P, 190 ng/ml [170 ng/ml with chemokines]; 168C, 36 ng/ml [33 ng/ml with chemokines]).To examine whether sensitivity to neutralization was affected by the coreceptor pathway utilized in infection of PBLs, we used inhibitory concentrations of CCR5-specific chemokine ligands RANTES, MIP-1α, and MIP-1β in order to restrict infection to the CXCR4 pathway. Addition of these chemokines to the PBL cultures did not affect virus growth, nor did it affect sensitivity to neutralization by the V3-directed human MAbs (Fig. ​(Fig.2).2). To the extent that CCR5 blockade was complete, these results suggest that the simple availability of the CCR5 pathway is not a factor in the resistance of PI viruses to neutralization.To strengthen this conclusion, we examined neutralization sensitivity in human U87-CD4 cell lines expressing only CXCR4 or CCR5. Using this method, we confirmed that the SI 168P virus remained refractory to neutralization by human MAbs 257-D and 268-D as well as by the murine MAb 50.1, regardless of whether infection occurred via CXCR4 or CCR5 (Fig. ​(Fig.3).3). These results suggest that availability of the CCR5 pathway is not a primary determinant for the resistance of PI viruses to neutralization. The TCLA 168C virus utilized CXCR4 only and was sensitive to neutralization. Open in a separate windowFIG. 3Neutralization sensitivity of 168 viruses in U87-CD4 cell lines expressing CCR5 or CXCR4 coreceptor. 168P (○, •) and 168C (▪) viruses were used to infect U87-CD4 cell lines expressing CXCR4 (•, ▪) or CCR5 (○) as described for Fig. ​Fig.1.1. The V3-directed MAbs were incubated with virus for 1 h prior to infection.

Molecularly cloned PI and TCLA envelope genes.

To understand better the changes that accompany adaptation and those that determine coreceptor utilization and neutralization sensitivity, we molecularly cloned the envelope genes of the 168P and 168C viruses. High-fidelity XL PCR (rTth and Vent DNA polymerases; PE Applied Biosystems) and primers envA and envN (15) were used to amplify a 3.1-kb region of proviral DNA encoding the rev and envelope genes. PCR products were isolated by unidirectional T/A cloning in the eucaryotic expression vector pCR3.1-Uni (Invitrogen). Expression in pCR3.1-Uni is driven by the cytomegalovirus immediate-early promoter. Multiple clones were isolated from each virus, and transient transfection studies in COS-7 cells confirmed the surface expression and fusion competence of all clones tested (data not presented).DNA sequence analysis demonstrated that all 168C molecular clones analyzed encoded the three adaptation-associated amino acid changes previously identified by PCR sequencing of the 168C virus population (V2, I166R; C2, I282N; and V3, G318R) (37). Two molecular clones of each 168P and 168C envelope were subjected to complete DNA sequence analysis (GenBank accession no. {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"AF035532","term_id":"2827997","term_text":"AF035532"}}AF035532 to {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"AF035534","term_id":"2828001","term_text":"AF035534"}}AF035534). Molecular clones 168C23 and 168C60 were identical throughout the envelope gene. Molecular clones 168P5 and 168P23 differed from each other and from the previously determined sequence at four to five positions distinct from those associated with adaptation. These scattered changes within the primary virus quasispecies are considered inconsequential at the present level of analysis; the significance of the three adaptation-associated changes is under separate investigation.Functional analysis of these molecularly cloned envelope genes was performed by incorporation of the molecularly cloned envelope protein into pseudotyped HIV virions. We used an envelope-defective provirus derived from the molecularly cloned NL4-3 provirus (kindly provided by I. S. Y. Chen, University of California, Los Angeles). The pNLthyΔBgl provirus (28) contains a BglII-BglII deletion within the envelope gene and a substitution of the viral nef gene with a cDNA encoding the murine Thy1.2 cell surface protein. The simian virus 40 ori was subsequently introduced into the plasmid to generate pSVNLthyΔBgl (27a). Cotransfection of COS-7 cells (16, 20) with pSVNLthyΔBgl provirus and the envelope expression plasmid resulted in the production of pseudotyped HIV virions. Culture supernatants were harvested 3 days posttransfection, filtered, and used to infect U87-CD4 cell lines expressing coreceptor. Cells infected by virions bearing the complementing envelope protein were identified by immunostaining for murine Thy1.2 or HIV proteins.As anticipated, the molecularly cloned envelope proteins recapitulated the coreceptor specificity of the parental virus population (see the legend to Fig. ​Fig.4).4). Pseudotyped virions containing 168C60 were able to infect only U87-CD4 cells expressing CXCR4, while virions containing 168P23 envelope were able to infect U87-CD4 cells expressing either CCR5 or CXCR4. Thus, the viral envelope protein appears to be the major, if not sole, determinant of viral coreceptor use. These findings also indicate that dual coreceptor use is a direct property of the envelope protein complex and not a result of a mixture of distinct envelope proteins in the SI virus population. This conclusion is corroborated by the failure of CCR5-specific chemokine ligands to diminish 168P virus infection in PBL culture (Fig. ​(Fig.22).Open in a separate windowFIG. 4Neutralization sensitivity of pseudotyped virions in U87-CD4 cell lines expressing CCR5 or CXCR4 coreceptor. Pseudotyped virions were derived by cotransfection of COS-7 cells with pSVNLthyΔBgl provirus and plasmid expressing 168P23 (○, •) or 168C60 (▪) envelope protein. Virion preparations were incubated with U87-CD4 cell lines expressing CXCR4 (•, ▪) or CCR5 (○) as described for Fig. ​Fig.1;1; V3-directed MAbs were added as indicated. The number of foci was normalized to control values (60 to 100 foci/well for U87-CD4-CXCR4 cells; 10 foci/well for U87-CD4-CCR5 cells). ∗, no foci were observed.Finally, we wished to determine the neutralization sensitivity of pseudotyped virions containing the molecularly cloned 168P23 and 168C60 envelope proteins and to confirm that coreceptor pathway is not a primary determinant of neutralization sensitivity. We found that infection of U87-CD4-CXCR4 cells by pseudotyped virions containing 168C60 envelope protein was sensitive to neutralization by MAbs 257-D, 268-D, and 50.1 at concentrations comparable to those determined in assays using 168C virus (Fig. ​(Fig.4).4). Pseudotyped virions containing 168P23 envelope protein remained refractory to neutralization by all three V3-directed MAbs, regardless of the coreceptor expressed by the U87-CD4 cell line. In summary, we examined the relationship between coreceptor utilization and sensitivity to neutralization by V3-directed MAbs. The observed dichotomy in the sensitivity to neutralization of PI and TCLA viruses had suggested a discrete difference between these viruses, and we tested one hypothesis: that PI viruses are refractory to neutralization as a result of their unique ability to utilize the CCR5 coreceptor. We examined neutralization sensitivity of a well-characterized SI primary isolate under experimental conditions wherein the virus was forced to utilize either CCR5 or CXCR4 for infection. We showed that coreceptor pathway is not a direct determinant of neutralization sensitivity. The primary virus envelope protein remained refractory to neutralization by V3-directed MAbs regardless of the coreceptor pathway utilized. Similarly, coreceptor utilization did not affect neutralization sensitivity by soluble CD4 (34) or HIVIG (data not presented).In discarding the otherwise attractive hypothesis that PI viruses escape neutralization through their unique ability to utilize CCR5, we are left to consider the as yet undefined structural differences between the envelope protein complex of PI and TCLA viruses. Several studies have suggested that critical determinants in the envelope protein of PI viruses are less accessible than those of TCLA viruses and that it is this differential access that determines neutralization sensitivity (reviewed in reference 25). By contrast, our studies have indicated similar binding of V3-directed MAbs to PBLs infected with neutralization-resistant isolate 168P or neutralization-sensitive isolate 168C (37). Thus, the basis for the differential neutralization sensitivity of PI and TCLA viruses remains unresolved.Our present studies also do not address whether changes in coreceptor utilization and/or neutralization sensitivity are necessarily linked as a consequence of adaptation. The analysis of independently derived PI and TCLA viruses may allow further separation of these viral phenotypes. Subsequent dissection of the amino acid changes that distinguish pedigreed PI and TCLA envelope proteins will help to define the structural bases underlying the changes that accompany adaptation.     

Modulation of Feline Immunodeficiency Virus Infection by Stromal Cell-Derived Factor

The α-chemokine receptor CXCR4 has recently been shown to support syncytium formation mediated by strains of feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) that have been selected for growth in the Crandell feline kidney cell line (CrFK-tropic virus). Given that both human and feline CXCR4 support syncytium formation mediated by FIV, we investigated whether human stromal cell-derived factor (SDF-1) would inhibit infection with FIV. Human SDF-1α and SDF-1β bound with a high affinity (K_Ds of 12.0 and 10.4 nM, respectively) to human cells stably expressing feline CXCR4, and treatment of CrFK cells with human SDF-1α resulted in a dose-dependent inhibition of infection by FIV_PET. No inhibitory activity was detected when the interleukin-2 (IL-2)-dependent feline T-cell line Mya-1 was used in place of CrFK cells, suggesting the existence of a CXCR4-independent mechanism of infection. Furthermore, neither the human β-chemokines RANTES, MIP-1α, MIP-1β, and MCP-1 nor the α-chemokine IL-8 had an effect on infection of either CrFK or Mya-1 cells with CrFK-tropic virus. Envelope glycoprotein purified from CrFK-tropic virus competed specifically for binding of SDF-1α to feline CXCR4 and CXCR4 expression was reduced in FIV-infected cells, suggesting that the inhibitory activity of SDF-1α in CrFK cells may be the result of steric hindrance of the virus-receptor interaction following the interaction between SDF and CXCR4. Prolonged incubation of CrFK cells with SDF-1α led to an enhancement rather than an inhibition of infection. Flow cytometric analysis revealed that this effect may be due largely to up-regulation of CXCR4 expression by SDF-1α on CrFK cells, an effect mimicked by treatment of the cells with phorbol myristate acetate. The data suggest that infection of feline cells with FIV can be mediated by CXCR4 and that, depending on the assay conditions, infection can be either inhibited or enhanced by SDF-1α. Infection with FIV may therefore prove a valuable model in which to study the development of novel therapeutic interventions for the treatment of AIDS.The initial stage in lentiviral infection involves the binding of the viral envelope glycoprotein (Env) to a molecule on the surface of the target cell. The primary high-affinity binding receptor for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is CD4 (9, 26), a member of the immunoglobulin supergene family of molecules. However, binding of the viral glycoprotein to CD4 is insufficient for infection to proceed (29); for virus-cell fusion to occur, the target cell must also express an accessory molecule or coreceptor. The principal coreceptors for HIV infection have now been identified as members of the seven-transmembrane domain (7TM) superfamily of molecules. Syncytium-inducing (SI) T-cell line-tropic strains of virus require coexpression of the α-chemokine receptor CXCR4 for infection (19), whereas non-syncytium-inducing (NSI) strains of virus require coexpression of the β-chemokine receptor CCR5 for infection (1, 6, 10, 13, 14). In addition, other chemokine receptors such as CCR2b and CCR3 (6, 13, 41, 48), the receptor encoded by human cytomegalovirus US28 (39, 41), and the orphan receptor STRL33 (28) can function as coreceptors for HIV infection. More recently, additional members of the 7TM superfamily have been identified as coreceptors for infection with simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV). Two of these receptors, termed Bonzo and BOB, support infection with not only SIV but also HIV type 2 (HIV-2) and macrophage-tropic or dualtropic (both macrophage- and T-cell-tropic) strains of HIV-1 (11). Bonzo has subsequently been identified as being identical to STRL33 (28), whereas BOB is identical to GPR15 (21). A subsequent study has demonstrated that an additional molecule, designated GPR1 (30), can function as a coreceptor for SIV (18). Thus, a diverse range of 7TM molecules which can support infection with primate lentiviruses have now been identified.The selective usage of chemokine receptors as coreceptors for infection by HIV and SIV is borne out by the sensitivity of the viruses to inhibition by chemokines. Infection with viruses which use CCR5 can be inhibited by the β-chemokines RANTES, MIP-1α, and MIP-1β (7, 14), whereas those which use CXCR4 can be inhibited by stromal cell-derived factor (SDF-1) (3, 36). Although infection of primary macrophages by certain primary NSI viruses is not inhibited reproducibly by the β-chemokines RANTES, MIP-1α, and MIP-1β (14, 33, 44), analogs of the β-chemokines such as AOP-RANTES that inhibit HIV infection with an increased potency, inhibit infection of both peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and primary macrophages, and do not trigger signalling via G proteins coupled to the chemokine receptor have been developed (47). Therefore, with the development of SDF-1 derivatives analogous to AOP-RANTES, it may be possible to generate therapeutic agents that are effective at inhibiting not only the NSI strains of HIV found in early infection but also the SI strains of virus which appear late in infection with the progression to AIDS.Feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) induces an AIDS-like illness in its natural host, the domestic cat (38). A proportion of primary isolates of FIV can be readily adapted to grow and form syncytia in the Crandell feline kidney (CrFK) cell line (45), analagous to the isolation of SI variants of HIV. Sequencing of the env gene from CrFK-tropic viruses would suggest that the principal determinant of CrFK tropism is an increase in charge of the V3 loop of the envelope glycoprotein (45, 51), further strengthening the analogy between CrFK-tropic strains of FIV and SI strains of HIV. While the primary high-affinity binding receptor for FIV remains elusive, recent studies have demonstrated a role for the feline homolog of CXCR4 in infection with CrFK-tropic strains of FIV (53, 56). Given that the appearance of CXCR4-dependent SI variants of HIV in the peripheral blood of HIV-infected individuals accompanies the progression to AIDS (8), the ability to study the role of such CXCR4-dependent strains of virus in disease pathogenesis is of obvious interest. Moreover, as it appears that several strains of SIV show preferential usage of CCR5 and not CXCR4 for infection (5, 11, 18), then FIV infection of the domestic cat is the only animal model described to date in which the contribution of CXCR4-dependent viruses to the pathogenesis of AIDS may be studied in the natural host of the virus.In this study, we investigated the nature of the interaction between FIV and the chemokine receptor CXCR4. Given the high degree of amino acid sequence homology between human and feline CXCR4 (56), we examined the interaction between human SDF-1 and feline CXCR4. We have found that human SDF-1 binds specifically to feline CXCR4 and inhibits infection with FIV. We demonstrate that SDF-1 can upregulate CXCR4 expression with a corresponding enhancement of infection and that this effect can be mimicked by treatment of the cells with the phorbol ester phorbol myristate acetate (PMA). Moreover, infection of interleukin-2 (IL-2)-dependent T cells with FIV was resistant to the inhibitory effects of SDF-1, suggesting the existence of a CXCR4-independent mechanism of infection in these cells. These data suggest that the mechanism of infection with FIV bears striking similarities to infection with HIV and that the study of FIV infection of the domestic cat may provide a valuable insight into the pathogenesis of AIDS.     

Resting Cell Neutralization Assay for HIV-1 Primary Isolates

A technique is described for detecting the activity of neutralizing polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies against HIV-1 primary isolates. Most commonly, neutralizing antibody activity for HIV-1 is assessed by quantifying the ability of antibodies to inhibit virus infection in mitogen-activated peripheral blood mononuclear cells or transformed lymphocytes. Because the target of HIV infectionin vivois neither a mitogen-activated nor a transformed cell, an assay using unstimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells as a more physiologic target cell was developed. This “resting cell assay” mainly utilizes primary HIV-1 isolates that have been carried for only a few passagesin vitro.The result is an assay that is more efficient to perform and that detects neutralizing activity with comparable or greater sensitivity than that previously described for assays of primary HIV-1 isolates.     

Study of the V3 Loop as a Target Epitope for Antibodies Involved in the Neutralization of Primary Isolates versus T-Cell-Line-Adapted Strains of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1

Previous studies characterized the third variable (V3) loop of the envelope gp120 as the principal neutralizing determinant for laboratory T-cell-line-adapted (TCLA) strains of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). However, primary viruses isolated from infected individuals are more refractory to neutralization than TCLA strains, suggesting that qualitatively different neutralizing antibodies may be involved. In this study, we investigated whether the V3 loop constitutes a linear target epitope for antibodies neutralizing primary isolates. By using peptides representative of the V3 regions of various primary isolates, an early, relatively specific and persistent antibody response was detected in sera from HIV-infected patients. To assess the relationship between these antibodies and neutralization, the same peptides were used in competition and depletion experiments. Addition of homologous V3 peptides led to a competitive inhibition in the neutralization of the TCLA strain HIV_MN/MT-4 but had no effect on the neutralization of the autologous primary isolate. Similarly, the removal of antibodies that bind to linear V3 epitopes resulted in a loss of HIV_MN/MT-4 neutralization, whereas no decrease in the autologous neutralization was measured. The different roles of V3-specific antibodies according to the virus considered were thereby brought to light. This confirmed the involvement of V3 antibodies in the neutralization of a TCLA strain but emphasized a more pronounced contribution of either conformational epitopes or epitopes outside the V3 loop as targets for antibodies neutralizing primary HIV-1 isolates. This result underlines the need to focus on new vaccinal immunogens with epitopes able to induce broadly reactive and efficient antibodies that neutralize a wide range of primary HIV-1 isolates.     

Association between Feline Immunodeficiency Virus Antibodies and Host Characteristics in Finnish Cats

Toward the end of 1989 the largest private veterinary laboratory in Finland (Vet/lab) began using a commercial combined ELISA test for Feline Immunodeficiency Virus (FIV) antibodies and Feline Leukemia Virus (FeLV) antigens (Cite ComboR). The overall proportion of FIV seropositive feline samples was 5% during the 22 month study period. The number of tests performed increased slowly while the positive test results decreased with time (7% in 1990 and 4% in 1991). The decrease in prevalence was assumed to reflect a change in the sample population rather than an actual change in the general cat population. There were more symptomatic and domestic cats tested in 1990 than 1991. The lower-risk groups in the second year of the study may simply be an indication that the cat owners became more aware of FIV and the motivation to send samples switched from the veterinarian’s interest to diagnose the disease in a symptomatic cat to the owner’s interest to survey their cats for possible FIV infection. In a multivariable analysis, breed, symptoms, age and sex were associated with the risk of FIV seropositivity The risk increased faster with age in males than in females (i.e., the age effect was not constant between sexes). The cats with symptoms had a higher risk than those without symptoms and non-purebred cats were at a higher risk than purebred cats. FeLV infection was not associated with FIV.     

Protection by Live, Attenuated Simian Immunodeficiency Virus against Heterologous Challenge

We examined the ability of a live, attenuated deletion mutant of simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV), SIVmac239Delta3, which is missing nef and vpr genes, to protect against challenge by heterologous strains SHIV89.6p and SIVsmE660. SHIV89.6p is a pathogenic, recombinant SIV in which the envelope gene has been replaced by a human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope gene; other structural genes of SHIV89.6p are derived from SIVmac239. SIVsmE660 is an uncloned, pathogenic, independent isolate from the same primate lentivirus subgrouping as SIVmac but with natural sequence variation in all structural genes. The challenge with SHIV89.6p was performed by the intravenous route 37 months after the time of vaccination. By the criteria of CD4(+) cell counts and disease, strong protection against the SHIV89.6p challenge was observed in four of four vaccinated monkeys despite the complete mismatch of env sequences. However, SHIV89.6p infection was established in all four previously vaccinated monkeys and three of the four developed fluctuating viral loads between 300 and 10,000 RNA copy equivalents per ml of plasma 30 to 72 weeks postchallenge. When other vaccinated monkeys were challenged with SIVsmE660 at 28 months after the time of vaccination, SIV loads were lower than those observed in unvaccinated controls but the level of protection was less than what was observed against SHIV89.6p in these experiments and considerably less than the level of protection against SIVmac251 observed in previous experiments. These results demonstrate a variable level of vaccine protection by live, attenuated SIVmac239Delta3 against heterologous virus challenge and suggest that even live, attenuated vaccine approaches for AIDS will face significant hurdles in providing protection against the natural variation present in field strains of virus. The results further suggest that factors other than anti-Env immune responses can be principally responsible for the vaccine protection by live, attenuated SIV.     

Vaccine-Induced Cellular Responses Control Simian Immunodeficiency Virus Replication after Heterologous Challenge

All human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) vaccine efficacy trials to date have ended in failure. Structural features of the Env glycoprotein and its enormous variability have frustrated efforts to induce broadly reactive neutralizing antibodies. To explore the extent to which vaccine-induced cellular immune responses, in the absence of neutralizing antibodies, can control replication of a heterologous, mucosal viral challenge, we vaccinated eight macaques with a DNA/Ad5 regimen expressing all of the proteins of SIVmac239 except Env. Vaccinees mounted high-frequency T-cell responses against 11 to 34 epitopes. We challenged the vaccinees and eight naïve animals with the heterologous biological isolate SIVsmE660, using a regimen intended to mimic typical HIV exposures resulting in infection. Viral loads in the vaccinees were significantly less at both the peak (1.9-log reduction; P < 0.03) and at the set point (2.6-log reduction; P < 0.006) than those in control naïve animals. Five of eight vaccinated macaques controlled acute peak viral replication to less than 80,000 viral RNA (vRNA) copy eq/ml and to less than 100 vRNA copy eq/ml in the chronic phase. Our results demonstrate that broad vaccine-induced cellular immune responses can effectively control replication of a pathogenic, heterologous AIDS virus, suggesting that T-cell-based vaccines may have greater potential than previously appreciated.It has been impossible thus far for vaccines to engender broadly reactive neutralizing antibodies against human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (12, 54). Investigators have therefore focused their attention on T-cell-based vaccines (9, 18, 26, 30, 34, 39, 48, 55). Previous preclinical studies in nonhuman primates have shown that vaccine-induced T-cell responses can partially control replication of homologous challenge viruses in the chronic phase (34, 56). Unfortunately, however, simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) loads exceeded 1 million copies in almost every vaccinated animal during the acute phase. Given the high levels of viral replication observed in these vaccinated macaques, it is possible that such T-cell-based vaccines might not be able to reduce transmission during the acute phase of infection in humans. These high levels of replication during the acute phase likely resulted in the generation of diverse viral quasispecies, providing the substrate for immune selection and eventual escape. Furthermore, in these studies, vaccinated animals were challenged with viruses that were similar to the SIV sequences in the vaccine constructs. Given the diversity of HIV, human vaccinees will never be exposed to viruses with a comparable level of sequence similarity to the vaccine constructs.An HIV-1 vaccine that induced T-cell responses exclusively has recently failed to show efficacy against the incidence of HIV infection and viremia in clinical testing. The STEP trial of a recombinant adenovirus 5 (Ad5)-vectored vaccine designed to induce HIV-specific T-cell responses in humans was widely seen as an important test of the T-cell vaccine concept (http://www.hvtn.org/media/pr/step111307.html) (11, 42). The lack of vaccine efficacy in the STEP trial has led some to conclude that T-cell-based vaccines may not be a viable approach to solving the AIDS epidemic (6, 49, 59). However, STEP trial vaccinees that became infected recognized a median of only five epitopes, mostly in the conserved proteins Gag and Pol. Given the sequence diversity of HIV (19), several of these vaccine-elicited T-cell responses may not have recognized epitopes in the infecting virus and, therefore, not constituted an adequate test of the T-cell vaccine concept.We therefore sought to test whether high-frequency vaccine-induced T-cell responses against multiple T-cell epitopes in one of the simian AIDS viruses, SIVmac239, could effectively impact viral replication after a physiologically relevant heterologous mucosal challenge with SIVsmE660. The majority of virus challenges in macaques have been carried out with high doses of homologous viruses. We used a repeated low-dose mucosal challenge with a heterologous SIV strain. We also used a challenge dose intended to mimic HIV mucosal exposures that lead to infection. Here we show that vaccine-induced T-cell responses can reduce heterologous virus replication during both the acute and chronic phases after a relevant viral challenge.