Quantitative Proteomic Analysis Reveals Metabolic Alterations,Calcium Dysregulation,and Increased Expression of Extracellular Matrix Proteins in Laminin α2 Chain–deficient Muscle

Congenital muscular dystrophy with laminin α2 chain deficiency (MDC1A) is one of the most severe forms of muscular disease and is characterized by severe muscle weakness and delayed motor milestones. The genetic basis of MDC1A is well known, yet the secondary mechanisms ultimately leading to muscle degeneration and subsequent connective tissue infiltration are not fully understood. In order to obtain new insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying MDC1A, we performed a comparative proteomic analysis of affected muscles (diaphragm and gastrocnemius) from laminin α2 chain–deficient dy^3K/dy^3K mice, using multidimensional protein identification technology combined with tandem mass tags. Out of the approximately 700 identified proteins, 113 and 101 proteins, respectively, were differentially expressed in the diseased gastrocnemius and diaphragm muscles compared with normal muscles. A large portion of these proteins are involved in different metabolic processes, bind calcium, or are expressed in the extracellular matrix. Our findings suggest that metabolic alterations and calcium dysregulation could be novel mechanisms that underlie MDC1A and might be targets that should be explored for therapy. Also, detailed knowledge of the composition of fibrotic tissue, rich in extracellular matrix proteins, in laminin α2 chain–deficient muscle might help in the design of future anti-fibrotic treatments. All MS data have been deposited in the ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD000978 (http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org/dataset/PXD000978).Congenital muscular dystrophy with laminin α2 chain deficiency, also known as MDC1A,¹ is a severe muscle wasting disease for which there is no cure. MDC1A is caused by mutations in the LAMA2 gene that lead to complete or partial deficiency of laminin α2 chain (1–3). Although the primary defect in MDC1A is known, the secondary molecular mechanisms eventually leading to muscle degeneration are not fully understood. In normal muscle, laminin α2 chain binds to the cell surface receptors dystroglycan and integrin α7β1, which both indirectly bind the cytoskeleton (4–7). Both of these adhesion complexes are important for normal skeletal muscle function, and laminin α2 chain binding to dystroglycan contributes to the maintenance of sarcolemmal integrity and protects muscles from damage (8), whereas laminin α2 chain binding to integrin α7β1 promotes myofiber survival (9, 10). In MDC1A, laminin α2 chain is absent or severely reduced, and the expression of dystroglycan and α7β1 is also dysregulated in MDC1A (9, 11, 12). Thus, the structural link is broken, and the yet to be determined downstream intracellular signaling pathways are also interrupted. Consequently, laminin α2 chain–deficient muscle fibers undergo degeneration–regeneration cycles, but rather quickly regeneration fails and muscle fibers die by apoptosis/necrosis followed by a major replacement of muscle tissue with connective tissue (3, 7). In order to unravel novel secondary molecular mechanisms, which could indicate new therapeutic targets, we decided to evaluate the protein expression profile in laminin α2 chain–deficient dy^3K/dy^3K muscle. Several proteomic profiling studies of dystrophin-deficient muscles (Duchenne muscular dystrophy) have been performed (13–20), as well as some with dysferlin-deficient muscles (Limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2B, Miyoshi myopathy) (21, 22). They all showed a great number of proteins that were differentially expressed in different dystrophic muscles and at different ages (13–22). However, proteomic analyses of laminin α2 chain–deficient muscle have not yet been performed. We here used multidimensional protein identification technology with tandem mass tags (TMT), a powerful shotgun label-based proteomic method that separates peptides in two-dimensional liquid chromatography (23, 24). We identified around 100 proteins that were differentially expressed in laminin α2 chain–deficient gastrocnemius and diaphragm muscles relative to the corresponding wild-type muscles, and the differential expression of selected proteins was verified with Western blot analysis or immunofluorescence.     

Proteome-derived Peptide Libraries Allow Detailed Analysis of the Substrate Specificities of Nα-acetyltransferases and Point to hNaa10p as the Post-translational Actin Nα-acetyltransferase

The impact of N^α-terminal acetylation on protein stability and protein function in general recently acquired renewed and increasing attention. Although the substrate specificity profile of the conserved enzymes responsible for N^α-terminal acetylation in yeast has been well documented, the lack of higher eukaryotic models has hampered the specificity profile determination of N^α-acetyltransferases (NATs) of higher eukaryotes. The fact that several types of protein N termini are acetylated by so far unknown NATs stresses the importance of developing tools for analyzing NAT specificities. Here, we report on a method that implies the use of natural, proteome-derived modified peptide libraries, which, when used in combination with two strong cation exchange separation steps, allows for the delineation of the in vitro specificity profiles of NATs. The human NatA complex, composed of the auxiliary hNaa15p (NATH/hNat1) subunit and the catalytic hNaa10p (hArd1) and hNaa50p (hNat5) subunits, cotranslationally acetylates protein N termini initiating with Ser, Ala, Thr, Val, and Gly following the removal of the initial Met. In our studies, purified hNaa50p preferred Met-Xaa starting N termini (Xaa mainly being a hydrophobic amino acid) in agreement with previous data. Surprisingly, purified hNaa10p preferred acidic N termini, representing a group of in vivo acetylated proteins for which there are currently no NAT(s) identified. The most prominent representatives of the group of acidic N termini are γ- and β-actin. Indeed, by using an independent quantitative assay, hNaa10p strongly acetylated peptides representing the N termini of both γ- and β-actin, and only to a lesser extent, its previously characterized substrate motifs. The immunoprecipitated NatA complex also acetylated the actin N termini efficiently, though displaying a strong shift in specificity toward its known Ser-starting type of substrates. Thus, complex formation of NatA might alter the substrate specificity profile as compared with its isolated catalytic subunits, and, furthermore, NatA or hNaa10p may function as a post-translational actin N^α-acetyltransferase.The multisubunit and ribosome-associated protein N^α-acetyltransferases (NATs)1 are omnipresent enzyme complexes that catalyze the transfer of the acetyl moiety from acetyl-CoA to the primary α-amines of N termini of nascent proteins (1–3). As up to 50 to 60% of yeast proteins and 80 to 90% of human proteins are modified in this manner, N^α-acetylation is a widespread protein modification in eukaryotes (4–7), and the pattern of modification has remained largely conserved throughout evolution (4, 8). NATs belong to a subfamily of the Gcn5-related N-acetyltransferase superfamily of N-acetyltransferases, additionally encompassing the well-studied histone acetyltransferases that are implicated in epigenetic imprinting.In yeast and humans, three main NAT complexes, NatA, NatB, and NatC were found to be responsible for the majority of N^α-terminal acetylations (1). The NatA complex, responsible for cotranslational N^α-terminal acetylation of proteins with Ser, Ala, Thr, Gly, and Val N termini, is composed of two main subunits, the catalytic subunit Naa10p (previously known as Ard1p) and the auxiliary subunit Naa15p (previously known as Nat1p/NATH) (9–11). Furthermore, a third catalytic subunit Naa50p (previously known as Nat5)—an acetyltransferase shown to function in chromosome cohesion and segregation (12–14)—was found to physically interact with the NatA complex of yeast (2), fruit fly (12), and human (15). Recently, human Naa50p (hNaa50p) was reported to display lysine or N^ε-acetyltransferase as well as NAT activity (16), the latter was defined as NatE activity (16). Interestingly, the chaperone-like, Huntingtin interacting protein HYPK, identified as a novel stable interactor of human NatA, was functionally implicated in the N-terminal acetylation of an in vivo NatA substrate, demonstrating that NAT complex formation and composition may have an overall influence on the observed (degree of) N^α-acetylation (17). Further, subunits of the human NatA complex have been coupled to cancer-related processes and differentiation, with altered subunit expression reported in papillary thyroid carcinoma, neuroblastoma, and retinoic acid induced differentiation. Furthermore, the NatA catalytic subunit was found to be implicated in processes such as hypoxia-response and the β-catenin pathway (18, 19). Of note is that in line with the differential localization patterns of the individual NatA subunits (9, 13, 20, 21), other data indicate that these subunits might well exert NatA-independent enzymatic functions (13, 22, 23). Given that a significant fraction of hNaa10p and hNaa15p are nonribosomal (9), and given the multitude of postulated post-translational in vivo N-acetylation events recently reported (24–26), these observations argue in favor of the existence of NAT complexes and/or catalytic NAT-subunits acting post-translationally.Similar to NatA, the NatB and NatC complexes, composed of the catalytic subunit Naa20p or Naa30p and the auxiliary subunits Naa25p or Naa35p and Naa38p respectively, are conserved from yeast to higher eukaryotes concerning their subunit composition as well as their substrate specificity. Both these complexes display activity toward methionine-starting N termini, with NatB preferring acidic residues as well as Asn and Gln at P2′-sites², whereas NatC prefers hydrophobic amino acid residues at substrate P2′-sites (1, 27, 28).N^α-acetylation affects various protein functions such as localization, activity, association, and stability (29, 30). Only recently a more generalized function of protein N^α-acetylation in generating so-called N-terminal degrons marking proteins for removal was put forward (31). The lack of mouse models in addition to the fact that (combined) knockdown of individual components of N^α-acetyltransferases only marginally affect the overall N^α-acetylation status (4) have so far hampered the molecular characterization of the substrate specificity profile of (yet uncharacterized) NATs. To date, all eukaryote N^α-acetylation events are assumed to be catalyzed by the five known NATs (32). However, an additional level of complexity is imposed by the fact that in contrast to yeast, higher eukaryotes express multiple splice variants of various NAT subunits as well as paralogs thereof (33, 34), further implicating that a specific NAT''s substrate specificity might be altered in this way, in addition to the possible existence of substrate redundancy. Moreover, regulation of substrate specificity and stability of NAT activity can be imposed by differential complex formation and post-translational modifications including phosphorylation, auto-acetylation, and specific proteolytic cleavage of the catalytic subunits (9, 16, 17). As such, a detailed understanding of the substrate specificity of NATs, and the regulation thereof, could help unravel the physiological substrate repertoires as well as the associated physiological roles of NATs in the normal and the disease state.The specificity of N^α-acetyltransferases and their endogenous substrates were originally studied by two-dimensional-PAGE: N^α-acetylation neutralizes the N-terminal positive charge, resulting in an altered electrophoretic protein migration during isoelectric focusing (35–38). Recently, this altered biophysical property was also exploited to enrich for protein N-termini using low pH strong cation exchange (SCX) chromatography (24, 39). As an example, SCX prefractionation combined with N-terminal combined fractional diagonal chromatography, a targeted proteomics technology negatively selecting for protein N-terminal peptides, stable isotope labeling of amino acids in cell culture, and amino-directed modifiers (40), was used to study the in vivo substrate repertoires of human as well as yeast NatA (4).Nevertheless, the various methods reported today to study in detail N^α-terminal acetylation and thus the specificities of different NATs make use of a limited and therefore somewhat biased set of synthesized peptide substrates and comprise the rather laborious detection of radioactive acetylated products as well as enzyme-coupled methods quantifying acetyl-CoA conversion. Because (proteome-derived) peptide libraries have been used extensively to study epitope mapping (41), protein-protein interactions (42), protein modifications such as phosphorylation (43), and proteolysis (44, 45), as well as for determining the substrate specificity of the N^α-deblocking peptide deformylase (46), we reckoned that the development of an oligopeptide-based acetylation assay should allow for more comprehensive screening of NAT-like activities. We here report on the development of a peptide-based method to systematically screen for the in vitro sequence specificity profile of individual NATs as well as endogenous NAT complexes. In summary, SCX enriched, N^α-free peptide libraries, derived from natural proteomes build up the peptide substrate pool. And, upon incubation, NAT N^α-acetylated peptides are enriched by a second SCX fractionation step, resulting in a positive selection of NAT-specific peptide substrates. By use of this proteome-derived peptide library approach, we here delineated (differences in) the specificity profiles of hNaa50p and hNaa10p as isolated hNatA components, as well as of assayed their combined activity when in their native hNatA complex.     

Conformational Properties of ��-PrP

Prion propagation involves a conformational transition of the cellular form of prion protein (PrP^C) to a disease-specific isomer (PrP^Sc), shifting from a predominantly α-helical conformation to one dominated by β-sheet structure. This conformational transition is of critical importance in understanding the molecular basis for prion disease. Here, we elucidate the conformational properties of a disulfide-reduced fragment of human PrP spanning residues 91–231 under acidic conditions, using a combination of heteronuclear NMR, analytical ultracentrifugation, and circular dichroism. We find that this form of the protein, which similarly to PrP^Sc, is a potent inhibitor of the 26 S proteasome, assembles into soluble oligomers that have significant β-sheet content. The monomeric precursor to these oligomers exhibits many of the characteristics of a molten globule intermediate with some helical character in regions that form helices I and III in the PrP^C conformation, whereas helix II exhibits little evidence for adopting a helical conformation, suggesting that this region is a likely source of interaction within the initial phases of the transformation to a β-rich conformation. This precursor state is almost as compact as the folded PrP^C structure and, as it assembles, only residues 126–227 are immobilized within the oligomeric structure, leaving the remainder in a mobile, random-coil state.Prion diseases, such as Creutzfeldt-Jacob and Gerstmann-Sträussler-Scheinker in humans, scrapie in sheep, and bovine spongiform encephalopathy in cattle, are fatal neurological disorders associated with the deposition of an abnormally folded form of a host-encoded glycoprotein, prion (PrP)² (1). These diseases may be inherited, arise sporadically, or be acquired through the transmission of an infectious agent (2, 3). The disease-associated form of the protein, termed the scrapie form or PrP^Sc, differs from the normal cellular form (PrP^C) through a conformational change, resulting in a significant increase in the β-sheet content and protease resistance of the protein (3, 4). PrP^C, in contrast, consists of a predominantly α-helical structured domain and an unstructured N-terminal domain, which is capable of binding a number of divalent metals (5–12). A single disulfide bond links two of the main α-helices and forms an integral part of the core of the structured domain (13, 14).According to the protein-only hypothesis (15), the infectious agent is composed of a conformational isomer of PrP (16) that is able to convert other isoforms to the infectious isomer in an autocatalytic manner. Despite numerous studies, little is known about the mechanism of conversion of PrP^C to PrP^Sc. The most coherent and general model proposed thus far is that PrP^C fluctuates between the dominant native state and minor conformations, one or a set of which can self-associate in an ordered manner to produce a stable supramolecular structure composed of misfolded PrP monomers (3, 17). This stable, oligomeric species can then bind to, and stabilize, rare non-native monomer conformations that are structurally complementary. In this manner, new monomeric chains are recruited and the system can propagate.In view of the above model, considerable effort has been devoted to generating and characterizing alternative, possibly PrP^Sc-like, conformations in the hope of identifying common properties or features that facilitate the formation of amyloid oligomers. This has been accomplished either through PrP^Sc-dependent conversion reactions (18–20) or through conversion of PrP^C in the absence of a PrP^Sc template (21–25). The latter approach, using mainly disulfide-oxidized recombinant PrP, has generated a wide range of novel conformations formed under non-physiological conditions where the native state is relatively destabilized. These conformations have ranged from near-native (14, 26, 27), to those that display significant β-sheet content (21, 23, 28–33). The majority of these latter species have shown a high propensity for aggregation, although not all are on-pathway to the formation of amyloid. Many of these non-native states also display some of the characteristics of PrP^Sc, such as increased β-sheet content, protease resistance, and a propensity for oligomerization (28, 29, 31) and some have been claimed to be associated with the disease process (34).One such PrP folding intermediate, termed β-PrP, differs from the majority of studied PrP intermediate states in that it is formed by refolding the PrP molecule from the native α-helical conformation (here termed α-PrP), at acidic pH in a reduced state, with the disulfide bond broken (22, 35). Although no covalent differences between the PrP^C and PrP^Sc have been consistently identified to date, the role of the disulfide bond in prion propagation remains disputed (25, 36–39). β-PrP is rich in β-sheet structure (22, 35), and displays many of the characteristics of a PrP^Sc-like precursor molecule, such as partial resistance to proteinase K digestion, and the ability to form amyloid fibrils in the presence of physiological concentrations of salts (40).The β-PrP species previously characterized, spanning residues 91–231 of PrP, was soluble at low ionic strength buffers and monomeric, according to elution volume on gel filtration (22). NMR analysis showed that it displayed radically different spectra to those of α-PrP, with considerably fewer observable peaks and markedly reduced chemical shift dispersion. Data from circular dichroism experiments showed that fixed side chain (tertiary) interactions were lost, in contrast to the well defined β-sheet secondary structure, and thus in conjunction with the NMR data, indicated that β-PrP possessed a number of characteristics associated with a “molten globule” folding intermediate (22). Such states have been proposed to be important in amyloid and fibril formation (41). Indeed, antibodies raised against β-PrP (e.g. ICSM33) are capable of recognizing native PrP^Sc (but not PrP^C) (42–44). Subsequently, a related study examining the role of the disulfide bond in PrP folding confirmed that a monomeric molten globule-like form of PrP was formed on refolding the disulfide-reduced protein at acidic pH, but reported that, under their conditions, the circular dichroism response interpreted as β-sheet structure was associated with protein oligomerization (45). Indeed, atomic force microscopy on oligomeric full-length β-PrP (residues 23–231) shows small, round particles, showing that it is capable of formation of oligomers without forming fibrils (35). Notably, however, salt-induced oligomeric β-PrP has been shown to be a potent inhibitor of the 26 S proteasome, in a similar manner to PrP^Sc (46). Impairment of the ubiquitin-proteasome system in vivo has been linked to prion neuropathology in prion-infected mice (46).Although the global properties of several PrP intermediate states have been determined (30–32, 35), no information on their conformational properties on a sequence-specific basis has been obtained. Their conformational properties are considered important, as the elucidation of the chain conformation may provide information on the way in which these chains pack in the assembly process, and also potentially provide clues on the mechanism of amyloid assembly and the phenomenon of prion strains. As the conformational fluctuations and heterogeneity of molten globule states give rise to broad NMR spectra that preclude direct observation of their conformational properties by NMR (47–50), here we use denaturant titration experiments to determine the conformational properties of β-PrP, through the population of the unfolded state that is visible by NMR. In addition, we use circular dichroism and analytical ultracentrifugation to examine the global structural properties, and the distribution of multimeric species that are formed from β-PrP.     

��-Defensins in Enteric Innate Immunity: FUNCTIONAL PANETH CELL ��-DEFENSINS IN MOUSE COLONIC LUMEN*

Paneth cells are a secretory epithelial lineage that release dense core granules rich in host defense peptides and proteins from the base of small intestinal crypts. Enteric α-defensins, termed cryptdins (Crps) in mice, are highly abundant in Paneth cell secretions and inherently resistant to proteolysis. Accordingly, we tested the hypothesis that enteric α-defensins of Paneth cell origin persist in a functional state in the mouse large bowel lumen. To test this idea, putative Crps purified from mouse distal colonic lumen were characterized biochemically and assayed in vitro for bactericidal peptide activities. The peptides comigrated with cryptdin control peptides in acid-urea-PAGE and SDS-PAGE, providing identification as putative Crps. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry experiments showed that the molecular masses of the putative α-defensins matched those of the six most abundant known Crps, as well as N-terminally truncated forms of each, and that the peptides contain six Cys residues, consistent with identities as α-defensins. N-terminal sequencing definitively revealed peptides with N termini corresponding to full-length, (des-Leu)-truncated, and (des-Leu-Arg)-truncated N termini of Crps 1–4 and 6. Crps from mouse large bowel lumen were bactericidal in the low micromolar range. Thus, Paneth cell α-defensins secreted into the small intestinal lumen persist as intact and functional forms throughout the intestinal tract, suggesting that the peptides may mediate enteric innate immunity in the colonic lumen, far from their upstream point of secretion in small intestinal crypts.Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs)² are released by epithelial cells onto mucosal surfaces as effectors of innate immunity (1–5). In mammals, most AMPs derive from two major families, the cathelicidins and defensins (6). The defensins comprise the α-, β-, and θ-defensin subfamilies, which are defined by the presence of six cysteine residues paired in characteristic tridisulfide arrays (7). α-Defensins are highly abundant in two primary cell lineages: phagocytic leukocytes, primarily neutrophils, of myeloid origin and Paneth cells, which are secretory epithelial cells located at the base of the crypts of Lieberkühn in the small intestine (8–10). Neutrophil α-defensins are stored in azurophilic granules and contribute to non-oxidative microbial cell killing in phagolysosomes (11, 12), except in mice whose neutrophils lack defensins (13). In the small bowel, α-defensins and other host defense proteins (14–18) are released apically as components of Paneth cell secretory granules in response to cholinergic stimulation and after exposure to bacterial antigens (19). Therefore, the release of Paneth cell products into the crypt lumen is inferred to protect mitotically active crypt cells from colonization by potential pathogens and confer protection against enteric infection (7, 20, 21).Under normal, homeostatic conditions, Paneth cells are not found outside the small bowel, although they may appear ectopically in response to local inflammation throughout the gastrointestinal tract (22, 23). Paneth cell numbers increase progressively throughout the small intestine, occurring at highest numbers in the distal ileum (24). Mouse Paneth cells express numerous α-defensin isoforms, termed cryptdins (Crps) (25), that have broad spectrum antimicrobial activities (6, 26). Collectively, α-defensins constitute approximately seventy percent of the bactericidal peptide activity in mouse Paneth cell secretions (19), selectively killing bacteria by membrane-disruptive mechanisms (27–30). The role of Paneth cell α-defensins in gastrointestinal mucosal immunity is evident from studies of mice transgenic for human enteric α-defensin-5, HD-5, which are immune to infection by orally administered Salmonella enterica sv. typhimurium (S. typhimurium) (31).The biosynthesis of mature, bactericidal α-defensins from their inactive precursors requires activation by lineage-specific proteolytic convertases. In mouse Paneth cells, inactive ∼8.4-kDa Crp precursors are processed intracellularly into microbicidal ∼4-kDa Crps by specific cleavage events mediated by matrix metalloproteinase-7 (MMP-7) (32, 33). MMP-7 null mice exhibit increased susceptibility to systemic S. typhimurium infection and decreased clearance of orally administered non-invasive Escherichia coli (19, 32). Although the α-defensin proregions are sensitive to proteolysis, the mature, disulfide-stabilized peptides resist digestion by their converting enzymes in vitro, whether the convertase is MMP-7 (32), trypsin (34), or neutrophil serine proteinases (35). Because α-defensins resist proteolysis in vitro, we hypothesized that Paneth cell α-defensins resist degradation and remain in a functional state in the large bowel, a complex, hostile environment containing varied proteases of both host and microbial origin.Here, we report on the isolation and characterization of a population of enteric α-defensins from the mouse colonic lumen. Full-length and N-terminally truncated Paneth cell α-defensins were identified and are abundant in the distal large bowel lumen.