Pocket Protein p130/Rb2 Is Required for Efficient Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Gene Expression and Viral Replication

We have reported previously that herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) infection disrupts normal progression of the mammalian cell cycle, causing cells to enter a G(1)-like state. Infected cells were characterized by a decline in cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2) activities, loss of hyperphosphorylated retinoblastoma protein (pRb), accumulation of E2F-pocket protein complexes, and failure to initiate cellular DNA replication. In the present study, we investigated the role of the pocket proteins pRb, p107, and p130 in HSV-1-dependent cell cycle inhibition and cyclin kinase regulation by infecting murine 3T3 cells derived from wild-type (WT) mouse embryos or embryos with deletions of pRb (pRb(-/-)), p107 (p107(-/-)), p130 (p130(-/-)), or both p130 and p107 (p130(-/-)/p107(-/-)). With respect to CDK2 inhibition, viral protein accumulation, viral DNA replication, and progeny virus yield, WT, pRb(-/-), and p107(-/-) cells were essentially identical. In contrast, after infection of p130(-/-) cells, we observed no inhibition of CDK2 activity, a 5- to 6-h delay in accumulation of viral proteins, an impaired ability to form viral DNA replication compartments, and reduced viral DNA synthesis. As a result, progeny virus yield was reduced 2 logs compared to that in WT cells. Notably, p130(-/-)/p107(-/-) double-knockout cells had a virus replication phenotype intermediate between those of the p107(-/-) and p130(-/-) cells. We conclude from these studies that p130 is a key factor in regulating aspects of cell cycle progression, as well as the timely expression of viral genes and replication of viral DNA.     

The Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Infected Cell Protein 22

As one of the immediate-early(IE)proteins of herpes simplex virus type 1(HSV-1),ICP22 is a multifunctional viral regulator that localizes in the nucleus of infected cells.It is required in experimental animal systems and some nonhuman cell lines,but not in Vero or HEp-2 cells.ICP22 is extensively phosphorylated by viral and cellular kinases and nucleotidylylated by casein kinase Ⅱ.It has been shown to be required for efficient expression of early(E)genes and a subset of late(L)genes.ICP22,in conjunction wit...     

Identification of Rep-Associated Factors in Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1-Induced Adeno-Associated Virus Type 2 Replication Compartments

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) is a human parvovirus that replicates only in cells coinfected with a helper virus, such as adenovirus or herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1). We previously showed that nine HSV-1 factors are able to support AAV rep gene expression and genome replication. To elucidate the strategy of AAV replication in the presence of HSV-1, we undertook a proteomic analysis of cellular and HSV-1 factors associated with Rep proteins and thus potentially recruited within AAV replication compartments (AAV RCs). This study resulted in the identification of approximately 60 cellular proteins, among which factors involved in DNA and RNA metabolism represented the largest functional categories. Validation analyses indicated that the cellular DNA replication enzymes RPA, RFC, and PCNA were recruited within HSV-1-induced AAV RCs. Polymerase δ was not identified but subsequently was shown to colocalize with Rep within AAV RCs even in the presence of the HSV-1 polymerase complex. In addition, we found that AAV replication is associated with the recruitment of components of the Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 complex, Ku70 and -86, and the mismatch repair proteins MSH2, -3, and -6. Finally, several HSV-1 factors were also found to be associated with Rep, including UL12. We demonstrated for the first time that this protein plays a role during AAV replication by enhancing the resolution of AAV replicative forms and AAV particle production. Altogether, these analyses provide the basis to understand how AAV adapts its replication strategy to the nuclear environment induced by the helper virus.Adeno-associated virus (AAV) is a human parvovirus that is currently used as a gene transfer vector (14). AAV particles consist of a small icosahedral capsid protecting a single 4.7-kb single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) genome with two open reading frames, rep and cap, surrounded by inverted terminal repeats (ITRs). The ITRs are the only sequences required in cis for genome replication and packaging. The rep gene encodes four nonstructural Rep proteins: Rep78, -68, -52, and -40. The two larger isoforms, Rep78 and -68, have origin binding, helicase, and site-specific endonuclease activities and are involved in AAV gene expression and genome processing, including replication and site-specific integration (39). The two smaller Rep isoforms are not required for AAV DNA replication but are involved in the control of viral gene expression and packaging of viral DNA (30).When wild-type (wt) AAV infects a cell in the absence of a helper virus, it enters latency. Latent AAV genomes persist in cells either as episomes or as integrated genomes, preferentially at a specific locus (named AAVS1) on human chromosome 19. In most instances, no detectable viral gene expression or genome replication occurs unless the cell is co- or superinfected by a helper virus, such as adenovirus, herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), or HSV-2. Under these conditions, AAV replication and assembly take place in large intranuclear domains called replication compartments (RCs) that frequently colocalize with replication domains formed by the helper virus itself (81). The viral genome replicates by leading-strand synthesis and generates new ssDNA molecules by a strand displacement mechanism that occurs after strand- and site-specific cleavage of viral DNA by Rep78/68 within the ITRs (39).Studies conducted on the relationship between AAV and its helper viruses are important not only to identify helper activities that can be used to produce recombinant AAV vectors but also to understand how AAV adapts its replication strategy to the helper virus and to the nuclear environment in general. Adenovirus helper functions have historically been the first and most extensively studied functions. These studies have shown that adenovirus helps AAV by stimulating viral gene expression and by enhancing AAV genome replication, mostly indirectly (19). Indeed, early studies showed that the adenovirus polymerase (E2b) is dispensable for AAV replication (8) and that the viral DNA-binding protein (DBP), the product of the E2a gene, is able to modestly enhance the processivity of AAV genome replication in vitro (77). More recently, the adenovirus proteins E1b55k and E4orf6 were shown to stimulate AAV genome replication by degrading the cellular Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 (MRN) complex that restricts AAV genome replication during adenovirus coinfection (32). The concept that AAV genome replication can rely mostly, if not uniquely, on direct help from cellular factors was further strengthened by the demonstration that purified proteins such as replication protein A (RPA), replication factor C (RFC), proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), minichromosome maintenance (MCM) proteins, and DNA polymerase δ (Pol δ) were sufficient to replicate the AAV genome in vitro in the presence of Rep (40-41, 43). The involvement of these cellular proteins during AAV genome replication was also confirmed by the proteomic analysis of factors associated with Rep proteins during adenovirus-induced AAV replication (42).Interestingly, studies conducted on HSV-1 helper activities suggest that the strategy of AAV replication may vary depending on the helper virus. Indeed, previous studies showed that the HSV-1 helicase-primase (HP) complex (UL5/8/52) and DBP (ICP8) could replicate transfected AAV-2 plasmids (80) and that the helicase activity, but not primase activity, of the HP complex was required for this effect (62, 66). More recently, a comprehensive study of HSV-1 helper activities demonstrated that the HSV-1 immediate-early proteins ICP0, ICP4, and ICP22 could stimulate rep gene expression, probably by diminishing intrinsic antiviral effects (1, 18). In addition, the HSV-1 DNA polymerase encoded by UL30, along with its associated processivity factor (UL42), although not strictly required, was demonstrated to significantly increase AAV replication levels induced in the presence of the HP complex and ICP8. Interestingly, the HSV-1 HP complex, DBP, and polymerase were also shown to be sufficient to replicate AAV DNA in vitro in the presence of Rep proteins without any cellular protein (78). Altogether, these observations indicate that in the context of an HSV-1 coinfection, AAV relies extensively on viral activities provided by the helper that directly participate in AAV genome replication.To further elucidate the strategy of AAV replication in the presence of HSV-1, we undertook a proteomic analysis to identify the cellular and HSV-1 factors associated with Rep proteins and, consequently, potentially recruited within AAV RCs. To analyze Rep-associated proteins in the presence and absence of HSV-1 DNA replication, this analysis was performed using wt HSV-1 and an HSV-1 mutant in which the DNA polymerase encoded by the UL30 gene is absent (HSVΔUL30). This study resulted in the identification of approximately 60 cellular proteins, among which the largest functional categories corresponded to factors involved in DNA and RNA metabolism. Immunofluorescence analyses confirmed that in the presence of HSV-1, a basal set of cellular DNA replication enzymes, including RPA, RFC, and PCNA, was recruited within AAV RCs, with the exception of the MCM helicases. The cellular DNA polymerases, in particular Pol δ, were not identified by this analysis but subsequently were shown to be recruited in AAV RCs even in the presence of the HSV-1 polymerase complex. In addition, our results indicate that AAV replication induced by HSV-1 is associated with the recruitment of DNA repair factors, including components of the MRN complex, the Ku proteins, PARP-1, and factors of the mismatch repair (MMR) pathway. Finally, several HSV-1 proteins, most notably the UL12 protein, were also identified within AAV RCs. Our analyses confirmed the association between UL12 and Rep and demonstrated for the first time that this viral exonuclease plays a critical role during AAV replication by enhancing the formation of discrete AAV replicative forms and the production of AAV particles.Altogether, these results indicate that in the presence of HSV-1, AAV may replicate by using a basal set of cellular DNA replication enzymes but also relies extensively on HSV-1-derived proteins for its replication, including UL12, a newly discovered helper factor. These results suggest that AAV may be able to differentially adapt its replication strategy to the nuclear environment induced by the helper virus.     

格尔德霉素抗病毒作用的相关基因研究

格尔德霉素(Geldanamycin,GA)作为一种苯醌安莎霉素类抗生素,能与热休克蛋白90特异性结合,具有广谱的抗病毒作用.为了从转录水平上研究GA抗病毒的分子机制,本研究以单纯疱疹病毒Ⅰ型(Herpes simplex vi-rus type 1,HSV-1)为对象,在确定药物有效抗病毒作用的基础上,采用基因芯片技术分析了在HeLa细胞中病毒感染和药物处理对细胞表达谱的影响,并筛选出GA抗病毒作用的可能相关基因.同时用半定量RT-PCR方法对GA诱导上调、HSV-1诱导下调的基因(ACTG1、RAN、SODl)以及GA诱导下调、HSV-1诱导上调的基因(HYALl)进行了验证.研究GA抗病毒作用对细胞表达谱的影响,有利于深入理解药物的抗病毒机制.     

The Ability of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Immediate-Early Protein Vmw110 To Bind to a Ubiquitin-Specific Protease Contributes to Its Roles in the Activation of Gene Expression and Stimulation of Virus Replication

Herpes simplex virus type 1 immediate-early protein Vmw110 stimulates the onset of virus infection and is required for efficient reactivation from latency. In transfection assays, Vmw110 is a potent activator of gene expression, but its mode of action has yet to be determined. Previous work has shown that Vmw110 localizes to specific intranuclear structures known as ND10, PML bodies, or PODs and causes the disruption of these domains. The ability of Vmw110 to disrupt ND10 correlates with its biological activities in infected and transfected cells. It has also been found that Vmw110 binds strongly and specifically to a ubiquitin-specific protease known as HAUSP, itself a component of a subset of ND10. In this study we have investigated the role of HAUSP in Vmw110 activity; single amino acid residues of Vmw110 required for the interaction were identified, and the effects of mutation of these residues in infected and transfected cells were then assayed. The results indicate that the ability to bind to HAUSP contributes to the functional activities of Vmw110.     

Herpes Simplex Virus Replication: Roles of Viral Proteins and Nucleoporins in Capsid-Nucleus Attachment

Replication of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) involves a step in which a parental capsid docks onto a host nuclear pore complex (NPC). The viral genome then translocates through the nuclear pore into the nucleoplasm, where it is transcribed and replicated to propagate infection. We investigated the roles of viral and cellular proteins in the process of capsid-nucleus attachment. Vero cells were preloaded with antibodies specific for proteins of interest and infected with HSV-1 containing a green fluorescent protein-labeled capsid, and capsids bound to the nuclear surface were quantified by fluorescence microscopy. Results showed that nuclear capsid attachment was attenuated by antibodies specific for the viral tegument protein VP1/2 (UL36 gene) but not by similar antibodies specific for UL37 (a tegument protein), the major capsid protein (VP5), or VP23 (a minor capsid protein). Similar studies with antibodies specific for nucleoporins demonstrated attenuation by antibodies specific for Nup358 but not Nup214. The role of nucleoporins was further investigated with the use of small interfering RNA (siRNA). Capsid attachment to the nucleus was attenuated in cells treated with siRNA specific for either Nup214 or Nup358 but not TPR. The results are interpreted to suggest that VP1/2 is involved in specific attachment to the NPC and/or in migration of capsids to the nuclear surface. Capsids are suggested to attach to the NPC by way of the complex of Nup358 and Nup214, with high-resolution immunofluorescence studies favoring binding to Nup358.     

Herpes Simplex Virus Types 1 and 2 Completely Help Adenovirus-Associated Virus Replication

In addition to adenoviruses, which are capable of completely helping adenovirus-associated virus (AAV) multiplication, only herpesviruses are known to provide any AAV helper activity, but this activity has been thought to be partial (i.e., AAV DNA, RNA, and protein syntheses are induced, but infectious particles are not assembled). In this study, however, we show that herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) and type 2 (HSV-2) are in fact complete AAV helpers and that AAV type 2 (AAV2) infectivity yields can approach those obtained when coinfections are carried out with a helper adenovirus. AAV helper activity was demonstrated in KB cells with two HSV-1 strains (11124 and 17MP) and an HSV-2 strain (HG52). Each herpesvirus supported AAV2 multiplication with comparable efficiency. AAV2 multiplication was similarly efficient in HSV-1 coinfections of HeLa cells, whereas lower yields were obtained in HEp-2 and primary human embryonic kidney cells. HSV-1 also supported AAV1 multiplication in HeLa cells but, at corresponding multiplicities of infection, AAV1 grew less efficiently than AAV2. Comparisons of the time courses of AAV2 DNA, RNA, and protein syntheses after coinfection with either adenovirus type 5 or HSV-1 revealed that, in each case, the onset of synthesis and attainment of maximal synthesis rate occurred earlier in coinfections with HSV-1. These findings demonstrate the linkage of AAV macromolecular synthesis to an event(s) in the helper virus cycle. Aside from this temporal association, helper-related differences in AAV macromolecular synthesis were not apparent.     

Herpes Simplex Virus and Human Cytomegalovirus Replication in WI-38 Cells I. Sequence of Viral Replication

A comparison, under standardized conditions, of herpes simplex virus (HSV) and human cytomegalovirus (CMV) revealed differences in viral morphology, in the timing of their infectious cycles, and in several morphological events during those cycles. Structural distinctions between the two viruses included the coating of unenveloped cytoplasmic CMV capsids, but not those of HSV, and a variation in the structure of their cores. Since the two cycles were carried out in the same host cell strain under conditions of one-step growth (input multiplicity = 10 PFU/cell), it was possible to construct time scales locating the major events of each cycle. Comparison of the two showed that HSV replicated and released progeny within 8 h postinfection, whereas CMV required 4 days. These results correlated well with those of concurrent plaque assays. Within the longer CMV cycle, most of the major events appeared retarded to a similar degree, and no obvious limiting step in particle production could be identified. Distinctions between the two cycles included the following: condensation of the chromatin in HSV- but not CMV-infected cells; the greater tendency of HSV to produce membrane alterations; and the appearance of cytoplasmic dense bodies in CMV- but not HSV-infected cells. Identification of these differences even under identical conditions of culture and infection strongly implies that they result from intrinsic differences in the nature of the viruses, and are not caused by variations in experimental conditions.     

Neuronal Interferon Signaling Is Required for Protection against Herpes Simplex Virus Replication and Pathogenesis

Interferon (IFN) responses are critical for controlling herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1). The importance of neuronal IFN signaling in controlling acute and latent HSV-1 infection remains unclear. Compartmentalized neuron cultures revealed that mature sensory neurons respond to IFNβ at both the axon and cell body through distinct mechanisms, resulting in control of HSV-1. Mice specifically lacking neural IFN signaling succumbed rapidly to HSV-1 corneal infection, demonstrating that IFN responses of the immune system and non-neuronal tissues are insufficient to confer survival following virus challenge. Furthermore, neurovirulence was restored to an HSV strain lacking the IFN-modulating gene, γ34.5, despite its expected attenuation in peripheral tissues. These studies define a crucial role for neuronal IFN signaling for protection against HSV-1 pathogenesis and replication, and they provide a novel framework to enhance our understanding of the interface between host innate immunity and neurotropic pathogens.     

In Vitro Processing of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 DNA Replication Intermediates by the Viral Alkaline Nuclease, UL12

Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) DNA replication intermediates exist in a complex nonlinear structure that does not migrate into a pulsed-field gel. Genetic evidence suggests that the product of the UL12 gene, termed alkaline nuclease, plays a role in processing replication intermediates (R. Martinez, R. T. Sarisky, P. C. Weber, and S. K. Weller, J. Virol. 70:2075–2085, 1996). In this study we have tested the hypothesis that alkaline nuclease acts as a structure-specific resolvase. Cruciform structures generated with oligonucleotides were treated with purified alkaline nuclease; however, instead of being resolved into linear duplexes as would be expected of a resolvase activity, the artificial cruciforms were degraded. DNA replication intermediates were isolated from the well of a pulsed-field gel (“well DNA”) and treated with purified HSV-1 alkaline nuclease. Although alkaline nuclease can degrade virion DNA to completion, digestion of well DNA results in a smaller-than-unit-length product that migrates as a heterogeneous smear; this product is resistant to further digestion by alkaline nuclease. The smaller-than-unit-length products are representative of the entire HSV genome, indicating that alkaline nuclease is not inhibited at specific sequences. To further probe the structure of replicating DNA, well DNA was treated with various known nucleases; our results indicate that replicating DNA apparently contains no accessible double-stranded ends but does contain nicks and gaps. Our data suggest that UL12 functions at nicks and gaps in replicating DNA to correctly repair or process the replicating genome into a form suitable for encapsidation.     

Role of the Nuclease Activities Encoded by Herpes Simplex Virus 1 UL12 in Viral Replication and Neurovirulence

Enzyme-dead mutations in the herpes simplex virus 1 UL12 gene that abolished its endo- and exonuclease activities only slightly reduced viral replication in cell cultures. However, the UL12 null mutation significantly reduced viral replication, suggesting that a UL12 function(s) unrelated to its nuclease activities played a major role in viral replication. In contrast, the enzyme-dead mutations significantly reduced viral neurovirulence in mice, suggesting that UL12 nuclease activities were critical for viral pathogenesis in vivo.