Leucyl-tRNA Synthetase-dependent and -independent Activation of a Group I Intron

Leucyl-tRNA synthetase (LeuRS) is an essential RNA splicing factor for yeast mitochondrial introns. Intracellular experiments have suggested that it works in collaboration with a maturase that is encoded within the bI4 intron. RNA deletion mutants of the large bI4 intron were constructed to identify a competently folded intron for biochemical analysis. The minimized bI4 intron was active in RNA splicing and contrasts with previous proposals that the canonical core of the bI4 intron is deficient for catalysis. The activity of the minimized bI4 intron was enhanced in vitro by the presence of the bI4 maturase or LeuRS.Although the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs)⁶ are best known for their role in protein synthesis, many have functionally expanded and are essential to a wide range of other cellular activities that are unrelated to tRNA aminoacylation (1). The class I aaRSs, leucyl- (LeuRS or NAM2) and tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase (TyrRS or CYT-18) are required for RNA splicing of cognate group I introns in the mitochondria of certain lower eukaryotes (2). In yeast, processing of two related group I introns called bI4 and aI4α (Fig. 1) from the cob and cox1α genes, respectively, require yeast mitochondrial LeuRS (3, 4). Likewise, expression of Neurospora crassa mitochondrial genes, such as those for the large ribosomal RNA, is dependent on TyrRS for excising group I introns (5).Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.Predicted secondary structures of the bI4 and aI4α group I introns. The secondary structure of the canonical core was based on previous predictions (19). Solid bold lines indicate linear connectivities of the nucleic acid strand with arrowheads oriented in the 5′ to 3′ direction. The dashed lines represent putative tertiary interactions. Dotted lines with numbers identify insertions where secondary structures were ambiguous. Arrows in the P1 and P9 domain show splice sites, whereas boxed nucleotides are paired regions.LeuRS facilitates RNA splicing in concert with a bI4 maturase that is encoded within the bI4 intron. Genetic investigations showed that an inactivated bI4 maturase resulting in deficient splicing activity of the bI4 and aI4α group I introns can be rescued by a suppressor mutation of LeuRS to restore mitochondrial respiration (4, 6). In addition, the splicing defect can be compensated by a mutant aI4α DNA endonuclease that is closely related to the bI4 maturase (7, 8).Previously, we used intracellular three-hybrid assays to demonstrate that LeuRS and bI4 maturase can independently bind to the bI4 intron and stimulate RNA splicing activity in the non-physiological yeast nucleus compartment (9). RNA-dependent two-hybrid assays also supported that the bI4 intron could simultaneously bind both the bI4 maturase and LeuRS. In this case, the RNA was co-expressed with LeuRS and bI4 maturase that was fused to either LexA or B42 to generate a two-hybrid response. This suggested that the bI4 intron was bridging these two protein splicing factors. In either the RNA-dependent two-hybrid or three-hybrid assays, bI4 intron splicing occurred only in the presence of LeuRS or bI4 maturase or both.We hypothesized that the bI4 maturase and LeuRS bind to distinct sites of the bI4 intron to form a ternary complex and promote efficient splicing activity. However, the functional basis of the collaboration between these two splicing cofactors or how either of them promotes RNA splicing remains unclear.We sought to characterize the respective splicing roles of the bI4 maturase and LeuRS via biochemical investigations. Previous attempts to develop an in vitro splicing assay for the bI4 intron or its closely related aI4α intron have failed (10, 11). It was hypothesized that the long length of the bI4 intron (∼1600 nucleotides) and its highly A:U-rich content (∼80%) hindered RNA folding in vitro as well as stabilization of its competent structure.Efforts to produce an active form of the bI4 intron have relied on building chimeric group I introns by interchanging RNA domains with the more stable Tetrahymena thermophila group I intron (11). Based on these results, it was proposed that the catalytic core of the bI4 group I intron was inherently defective (11). In this case, the group I intron would be expected to be completely dependent on its protein splicing factors similar to the bI3 intron that relies on the bI3 maturase and Mrs1 for activity (12). Thus, it was hypothesized that the bI4 maturase and/or LeuRS splicing factors aided the bI4 group I intron by targeting its core region to compensate for these deficiencies.We focused our efforts on re-designing the bI4 intron to develop a minimized molecule that might be competent for splicing. Because both the bI4 and aI4α group I introns rely on the bI4 maturase and LeuRS for their splicing activity, we compared their secondary structures to identify and eliminate peripheral regions outside of their catalytic cores. A small active derivative of the bI4 intron, comprised of just 380 nucleotides primarily from the canonical core, was generated. Thus, we show that, in and of itself, the canonical core of this group I intron is competent for splicing. Both the bI4 maturase and LeuRS enhance the splicing activity of the minimized bI4 intron. However, it is possible that protein-dependent splicing of the bI4 intron represents an intermediate evolutionary step in which the RNA activity is becoming increasingly dependent on its protein splicing factors.     

A Role for SRp54 during Intron Bridging of Small Introns with Pyrimidine Tracts Upstream of the Branch Point

One of the earliest steps in pre-mRNA recognition involves binding of the splicing factor U2 snRNP auxiliary factor (U2AF or MUD2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae) to the 3′ splice site region. U2AF interacts with a number of other proteins, including members of the serine/arginine (SR) family of splicing factors as well as splicing factor 1 (SF1 or branch point bridging protein in S. cerevisiae), thereby participating in bridging either exons or introns. In vertebrates, the binding site for U2AF is the pyrimidine tract located between the branch point and 3′ splice site. Many small introns, especially those in nonvertebrates, lack a classical 3′ pyrimidine tract. Here we show that a 59-nucleotide Drosophila melanogaster intron contains C-rich pyrimidine tracts between the 5′ splice site and branch point that are needed for maximal binding of both U1 snRNPs and U2 snRNPs to the 5′ and 3′ splice site, respectively, suggesting that the tracts are the binding site for an intron bridging factor. The tracts are shown to bind both U2AF and the SR protein SRp54 but not SF1. Addition of a strong 3′ pyrimidine tract downstream of the branch point increases binding of SF1, but in this context, the upstream pyrimidine tracts are inhibitory. We suggest that U2AF- and/or SRp54-mediated intron bridging may be an alternative early recognition mode to SF1-directed bridging for small introns, suggesting gene-specific early spliceosome assembly.Pre-mRNA splicing is a conserved process occurring in a wide variety of eucaryotes with differing exon/intron architectures (reviewed in references 4, 6, 9, 15, 20, and 26). Vertebrates typically have small exons and large introns. Nonmetazoans frequently have the opposite genetic organization, with introns smaller than the minimum permissible for splicing of a vertebrate intron. Drosophila melanogaster possesses a mixture of these two classes of intron sizes (16, 23). In addition, more than half of the small introns in Drosophila are missing a prominent vertebrate splicing signal, the 3′ polypyrimidine tract (23). For these reasons, Drosophila provides a model system in which to study potential mechanistic variations operating during recognition of splicing signals.In the general model of early vertebrate spliceosome complex assembly, U1 snRNP binds to the 5′ splice site and U2 snRNP auxiliary factor (U2AF) binds to the 3′ polypyrimidine tract, thereby facilitating U2 snRNP interaction with the branch point. Various members of the serine/arginine (SR) family of proteins may participate by promoting or stabilizing these interactions (reviewed in references 13, 22, and 31). This family of proteins may also act as exon or intron bridging factors via their SR-mediated interaction with SR domains on the small subunit of U2AF (U2AF³⁵) and the U1 70K protein (32, 33, 38). SF1, originally discovered as an essential splicing factor in reconstitution assays (19), has also been observed to bind to the branch point (7, 8). In yeast, BBP (branch point bridging protein), the ortholog to SF1, functions as an intron bridging factor via interactions with U1 snRNP-associated proteins and the large subunit of U2AF (U2AF⁶⁵) (1, 2). It is assumed that vertebrate SF1 can play a similar role, although the mammalian equivalents to the yeast U1 snRNP proteins that interact with BBP have not yet been identified. Furthermore, the relationship between bridging by SR proteins and that afforded by SF1 is unclear.We have previously examined the cis-acting sequences required for efficient splicing of a constitutively spliced small (59-nucleotide [nt]) intron from the D. melanogaster mle gene that lacks a well-defined pyrimidine tract between the branch point and 3′ splice site (18, 29). Assembly of initial ATP-dependent spliceosomes (complex A) on the mle intron requires both the 5′ and 3′ splice sites, suggesting concerted recognition of the entire intron (29). Instead of a classic pyrimidine tract, the mle intron contains two C-rich tracts located between the 5′ splice site and branch point that are necessary for efficient splicing of this intron (18). In addition to a requirement for maximal splicing efficiency, the pyrimidine stretches are also necessary for binding of U2AF, interaction of factors with the 5′ splice site, and proper assembly of the active spliceosome, suggesting that these sequences affect early assembly events at both ends of this small intron. Interestingly, the upstream C-rich tracts are inhibitory if a classical 3′ pyrimidine tract is introduced between the branch point and 3′ splice site (18). This observation suggests competing pathways of factor binding to this substrate and also raises the possibility of alternative gene-specific modes of association of constitutive factors with introns.Here we demonstrate that both U2AF and an SR protein, SRp54, interact with the C-rich tracts in the mle intron. The central location of the pyrimidine tracts, their importance for maximal splicing, and the ability of human SRp54 to interact with U2AF⁶⁵ instead of U2AF³⁵ (37) suggested that the binding of SRp54 to the tracts could replace SF1 in bridging this intron. Immunoprecipitation studies using an antibody specific for SF1 indicated that SF1 did not contact mle precursor RNA unless a pyrimidine tract was introduced downstream of the branch point. Furthermore, antibodies against either SRp54 or U2AF immunoprecipitated both halves of a precleaved mle splicing substrate, suggesting that these factors either directly or indirectly interact with both the 5′ and 3′ splice sites. We suggest that SRp54 participates in bridging the small mle intron via its ability to bind both the C-rich tracts and the large subunit of U2AF.     

Contribution of Flavin Covalent Linkage with Histidine 99 to the Reaction Catalyzed by Choline Oxidase

The FAD-dependent choline oxidase has a flavin cofactor covalently attached to the protein via histidine 99 through an 8α-N(3)-histidyl linkage. The enzyme catalyzes the four-electron oxidation of choline to glycine betaine, forming betaine aldehyde as an enzyme-bound intermediate. The variant form of choline oxidase in which the histidine residue has been replaced with asparagine was used to investigate the contribution of the 8α-N(3)-histidyl linkage of FAD to the protein toward the reaction catalyzed by the enzyme. Decreases of 10-fold and 30-fold in the k_cat/K_m and k_cat values were observed as compared with wild-type choline oxidase at pH 10 and 25 °C, with no significant effect on k_cat/K_O using choline as substrate. Both the k_cat/K_m and k_cat values increased with increasing pH to limiting values at high pH consistent with the participation of an unprotonated group in the reductive half-reaction and the overall turnover of the enzyme. The pH independence of both ^D(k_cat/K_m) and ^Dk_cat, with average values of 9.2 ± 3.3 and 7.4 ± 0.5, respectively, is consistent with absence of external forward and reverse commitments to catalysis, and the chemical step of CH bond cleavage being rate-limiting for both the reductive half-reaction and the overall enzyme turnover. The temperature dependence of the ^Dk_red values suggests disruption of the preorganization in the asparagine variant enzyme. Altogether, the data presented in this study are consistent with the FAD-histidyl covalent linkage being important for the optimal positioning of the hydride ion donor and acceptor in the tunneling reaction catalyzed by choline oxidase.A number of enzymes, including dehydrogenases (1–3), monooxygenases (4–7), halogenases (8–11), and oxidases (7, 12, 13), employ flavin cofactors (FAD or FMN) for their catalytic processes. About a tenth of all flavoproteins have been shown to contain a covalently attached cofactor, which may be linked at the C8M position via histidyl, tyrosyl, or cysteinyl side chains or at the C6M position via a cysteinyl side chain (14). Glucooligosaccharide oxidase (15, 16), hexose oxidase (17), and berberine bridge enzyme (18, 19) are examples of flavoproteins (FAD as cofactor) with both linkages present in one flavin molecule. The covalent linkages in flavin-dependent enzymes have been shown to stabilize protein structure (20–22), prevent loss of loosely bound flavin cofactors (23), modulate the redox potential of the flavin microenvironment (20, 23–27), facilitate electron transfer reactions (28), and contribute to substrate binding as in the case of the cysteinyl linkage (20). However, no study has implicated a mechanistic role of the flavin covalent linkages in enzymatic reactions in which a hydride ion is transferred by quantum mechanical tunneling.The discovery of quantum mechanical tunneling in enzymatic reactions, in which hydrogen atoms, protons, and hydride ions are transferred, has attracted considerable interest in enzyme studies geared toward understanding the mechanisms underlying the several orders of magnitudes in the rate enhancements of protein-catalyzed reactions compared with non-enzymatic ones. Tunneling mechanisms have been shown in a wide array of cofactor-dependent enzymes, including flavoenzymes. Examples of flavoenzymes in which the tunneling mechanisms have been demonstrated include morphinone reductase (29, 30), pentaerythritol tetranitrate reductase (29), glucose oxidase (31–33), and choline oxidase (34). Mechanistic data on Class 2 dihydroorotate dehydrogenases, also with a flavin cofactor (FMN) covalently linked to the protein moiety (35, 36), could only propose a mechanism that is either stepwise or concerted with significant quantum mechanical tunneling for the hydride transfer from C6 and the deprotonation at C5 in the oxidation of dihydroorotate to orotate (37). This leaves choline oxidase as the only characterized enzyme with a covalently attached flavin cofactor (12, 38), where the oxidation of its substrate occurs unequivocally by quantum mechanical tunneling.Choline oxidase from Arthrobacter globiformis catalyzes the two-step FAD-dependent oxidation of the primary alcohol substrate choline to glycine betaine with betaine aldehyde, which is predominantly bound to the enzyme and forms a gem-diol species, as intermediate (Scheme 1). Glycine betaine accumulates in the cytoplasm of plants and bacteria as a defensive mechanism against stress conditions, thus making genetic engineering of relevant plants of economic interest (39–45), and the biosynthetic pathway for the osmolyte is a potential drug target in human microbial infections of clinical interest (46–48). The first oxidation step catalyzed by choline oxidase involves the transfer of a hydride ion from a deprotonated choline to the protein-bound flavin followed by reaction of the anionic flavin hydroquinone with molecular oxygen to regenerate the oxidized FAD (for a recent review see Ref. 50). The gem-diol choline, i.e. hydrated betaine aldehyde, is the substrate for the second oxidation step (49), suggesting that the reaction may follow a similar mechanism. The isoalloxazine ring of the flavin cofactor, which is buried within the protein, is physically constrained through a covalent linkage via the C(8) methyl of the flavin and the N(3) atom of the histidine side chain at position 99 (Fig. 1) (12). Also contributing to the physical constrain are the proximity of Ile-103 to the pyrimidine ring and the interactions of the backbone atoms of residues His-99 through Ile-103 with the isoalloxazine ring. The rigid positioning of the isoalloxazine ring could only permit a solvent-excluded cavity of ∼125 ų adjacent to the re face of the FAD to accommodate a 93-ų choline molecule in the substrate binding domain (12). Mechanistic data thus far obtained on choline oxidase, coupled with the crystal structure of the wild-type enzyme resolved to 1.86 Å, are consistent with a quantum tunneling mechanism for the hydride ion transfer occurring within a highly preorganized enzyme-substrate complex (Scheme 2) (12, 34, 50). Exploitation of the tunneling mechanism requires minimal independent movement of the hydride ion donor and acceptor, with the only dynamic motions permitted being the ones that promote the hydride transfer reaction.Open in a separate windowSCHEME 1.Two-step, four-electron oxidation of choline catalyzed by choline oxidase.Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.x-ray crystal structure of the active site of wild-type choline oxidase resolved to 1.86 Å (PDB 2jbv). Note the significant distortion of the flavin ring at the C(4a) atom, which is due to the presence of a C(4a) adduct (69).Open in a separate windowSCHEME 2.The hydride ion transfer reaction from the α-carbon of the activated choline alkoxide species to the N(5) atom of the isoalloxazine ring of the enzyme-bound flavin in choline oxidase.In the present study, the contribution of the physically constrained flavin isoalloxazine ring to the reaction catalyzed by choline oxidase has been investigated in a variant enzyme in which the histidine residue at position 99 was replaced with an asparagine. The results suggest that, although not being required per se, the covalent linkage in choline oxidase contributes to the hydride tunneling reaction by either preventing independent movement or contributing to the optimal positioning of the flavin acting as hydride ion acceptor with respect to the alkoxide species acting as a donor. However, the covalent linkage is not required for the reaction.     

Functional Roles of the Tetramer Organization of Malic Enzyme

Malic enzyme has a dimer of dimers quaternary structure in which the dimer interface associates more tightly than the tetramer interface. In addition, the enzyme has distinct active sites within each subunit. The mitochondrial NAD(P)⁺-dependent malic enzyme (m-NAD(P)-ME) isoform behaves cooperatively and allosterically and exhibits a quaternary structure in dimer-tetramer equilibrium. The cytosolic NADP⁺-dependent malic enzyme (c-NADP-ME) isoform is noncooperative and nonallosteric and exists as a stable tetramer. In this study, we analyze the essential factors governing the quaternary structure stability for human c-NADP-ME and m-NAD(P)-ME. Site-directed mutagenesis at the dimer and tetramer interfaces was employed to generate a series of dimers of c-NADP-ME and m-NAD(P)-ME. Size distribution analysis demonstrated that human c-NADP-ME exists mainly as a tetramer, whereas human m-NAD(P)-ME exists as a mixture of dimers and tetramers. Kinetic data indicated that the enzyme activity of c-NADP-ME is not affected by disruption of the interface. There are no significant differences in the kinetic properties between AB and AD dimers, and the dimeric form of c-NADP-ME is as active as tetramers. In contrast, disrupting the interface of m-NAD(P)-ME causes the enzyme to be less active than wild type and to become less cooperative for malate binding; the k_cat values of mutants decreased with increasing K_d,24 values, indicating that the dissociation of subunits at the dimer or tetramer interfaces significantly affects the enzyme activity. The above results suggest that the tetramer is required for a fully functional m-NAD(P)-ME. Taken together, the analytical ultracentrifugation data and the kinetic analysis of these interface mutants demonstrate the differential role of tetramer organization for the c-NADP-ME and m-NAD(P)-ME isoforms. The regulatory mechanism of m-NAD(P)-ME is closely related to the tetramer formation of this isoform.Malic enzymes catalyze a reversible oxidative decarboxylation of l-malate to yield pyruvate and CO₂ with reduction of NAD(P)⁺ to NAD(P)H. This reaction requires a divalent metal ion (Mg²⁺ or Mn²⁺) for catalysis (1–3). Malic enzymes are found in a broad spectrum of living organisms that share conserved amino acid sequences and structural topology; such shared characteristics reveal a crucial role for the biological functions of these enzymes (4, 5). In mammals, malic enzymes have been divided into three isoforms according to their cofactor specificity and subcellular localization as follows: cytosolic NADP⁺-dependent (c-NADP-ME),² mitochondrial NADP⁺-dependent (m-NADP-ME), and mitochondrial NAD(P)⁺-dependent (m-NAD(P)-ME). The m-NAD(P)-ME isoform displays dual cofactor specificity; it can use both NAD⁺ and NADP⁺ as the coenzyme, but NAD⁺ is more favored in a physiological environment (6–8). Dissimilar to the other two isoforms, m-NAD(P)-ME binds malate cooperatively, and it can be allosterically activated by fumarate; the sigmoidal kinetics observed with cooperativity is abolished by fumarate (9–12). Mutagenesis and kinetic studies demonstrated that ATP is an active-site inhibitor, although it also binds to the exo sites in the tetramer interface (13–15). Structural studies also revealed an allosteric binding site for fumarate residing at the dimer interface. Mutation in the binding site significantly affects the activating effects of fumarate (11, 16, 17).The c-NADP-ME and m-NADP-ME isoforms play an important role in lipogenesis by providing NADPH for the biosynthesis of long-chain fatty acids and steroids. Thus, c-NADP-ME together with acetyl-CoA carboxylase, fatty-acid synthase, and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase are classified as lipogenic enzymes (2, 18–21). The m-NAD(P)-ME isoform has attracted much attention because it is involved in glutaminolysis, which is an energy-producing pathway of tumor cells that utilizes glutamine and glutamate. Thus, m-NAD(P)-ME is considered to be a potential target in cancer therapy (22–27).Various crystal structures of malic enzymes in complex with substrate, metal ion, coenzyme, regulator, and inhibitor are available in the Protein Data Bank (4, 11, 28–32). The overall tertiary structures of these malic enzymes are similar, but there are still some differences that may be significant for catalysis and regulation of the enzyme. Malic enzyme exists as a dimer of dimers with a stronger association of the dimer interface than that of the tetramer interface (Fig. 1A). The dimer interface is formed by subunits A and B or C and D (Fig. 1B), whereas the tetramer interaction consists of contacts between subunits A and D or B and C (Fig. 1C). A hydrophobic interaction is the major driving force for subunit assembly, but hydrogen bonding and ionic interactions also contribute markedly. The homotetramer of the enzyme is composed of four identical monomers each with its own active site. In the structure of human m-NAD(P)-ME, aside from its well defined active site, there are two regulatory sites on the enzyme (Fig. 1A). One of these sites is located at the dimer interface and is occupied by fumarate (Fig. 1B), whereas the other site, which is referred to as the exo site, is located at the tetramer interface and is occupied by either an NAD or an ATP molecule (Fig. 1A). In the ME family, Ascaris suum and human m-NAD(P)-ME were found to be activated by fumarate (11, 15–17, 31). However, the relationship between enzyme regulation and subunit-subunit interaction is still unclear.Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.Dimer and tetramer interfaces of human m-NAD(P)-ME. A, dimer of dimers quaternary structure of human m-NAD(P)-ME (Protein Data Bank code 1PJ3). The active site, fumarate site, and exo site in each subunit are indicated. B, dimer interface between A and B subunits of m-NAD(P)-ME. C, tetramer interface between A and D subunits of m-NAD(P)-ME. The amino acid residues at the dimer interface, Gln-51, Glu-90, Asp-139, His-142, and Asp-568 and C terminus in the tetramer interface, are represented by ball-and-stick modeling. The amino acid residues 51 and 90 in human c-NADP-ME are His and Asp, respectively. This figure was generated with PyMOL (DeLano Scientific LLC, San Carlos, CA).Previous studies have shown that the quaternary structure stability of malic enzyme isoforms is diverse. At neutral pH, pigeon c-NADP-ME exists as a unique tetramer with a sedimentation coefficient of ∼10 S (33–35), whereas human m-NAD(P)-ME exists as a mixture of tetramer and dimer of 9.5 S and 6.5 S, respectively (13, 35). Some mutations at the interface will affect the quaternary structure (34–37). Although the crystal structure of human c-NADP-ME has not been resolved, it is believed that it is similar to pigeon c-NADP-ME.Here we analyze the essential factors governing quaternary structure stability for human c-NADP-ME and m-NAD(P)-ME. Site-directed mutagenesis at the dimer and tetramer interfaces was used to disrupt the tetramer organization to create a series of c-NADP-ME and m-NAD(P)-ME dimers. Combined with the analytical ultracentrifugation data and kinetic analysis of these interface mutants, we demonstrate the differential role of tetramer organization for the c-NADP-ME and m-NAD(P)-ME isoforms. The regulatory mechanism of m-NAD(P)-ME is highly associated with the tetramer formation of this isoform.     

Direct Fe2+ Sensing by Iron-responsive Messenger RNA��Repressor Complexes Weakens Binding

Fe²⁺ is now shown to weaken binding between ferritin and mitochondrial aconitase messenger RNA noncoding regulatory structures ((iron-responsive element) (IRE)-RNAs) and the regulatory proteins (IRPs), which adds a direct role of iron to regulation that can complement the well known regulatory protein modification and degradative pathways related to iron-induced mRNA translation. We observe that the K_d value increases 17-fold in 5′-untranslated region IRE-RNA·repressor complexes; Fe²⁺, is studied in the absence of O₂. Other metal ions, Mn²⁺ and Mg²⁺ have similar effects to Fe²⁺ but the required Mg²⁺ concentration is 100 times greater than for Fe²⁺ or Mn²⁺. Metal ions also weaken ethidium bromide binding to IRE-RNA with no effect on IRP fluorescence, using Mn²⁺ as an O₂-resistant surrogate for Fe²⁺, indicating that metal ions bound IRE-RNA but not IRP. Fe²⁺ decreases IRP repressor complex stability of ferritin IRE-RNA 5–10 times compared with 2–5 times for mitochondrial aconitase IRE-RNA, over the same concentration range, suggesting that differences among IRE-RNA structures contribute to the differences in the iron responses observed in vivo. The results show the IRE-RNA·repressor complex literally responds to Fe²⁺, selectively for each IRE-mRNA.Iron (e.g. ferrous sulfate, ferric citrate, and hemin) added to animal cells changes translation rates of messenger RNAs encoding proteins of iron traffic and oxidative metabolism (1–4). To cross cell membranes, iron ions are transported by membrane proteins such as DMT1 or carried on proteins such as transferrin. Inside the cells, iron is mainly in heme, FeS clusters, non-heme iron cofactors of proteins, and iron oxide minerals coated by protein nanocages (ferritins). Iron in transit is thought to be Fe²⁺ in labile “pools” accessible to small molecular weight chelators, and/or bound loosely by chaperones.When iron concentrations in the cells increase, a group of mRNAs with three-dimensional, noncoding structures in the 5′-untranslated region (UTR)³ are derepressed (Fig. 1A), i.e. the fraction of the mRNAs in mRNA·repressor protein complexes, which inhibit ribosome binding, decreases and the fraction of the mRNAs in polyribosomes increases (5–7). The three-dimensional, noncoding mRNA structure, representing a family of related structures, is called the iron-responsive element, or IRE, and the repressors are called iron regulatory proteins (IRPs). Together they are one of the most extensively studied eukaryotic messenger RNA regulatory systems (1–4). In addition to large numbers of cell studies, structures of IRE-RNAs are known from solution NMR (8–12), and the RNA·protein complex from x-ray crystallography (13). Recent data indicate that demetallation of IRP1 and disruption of the [4Fe-4S] cluster that inhibits IRP1 binding to RNA will be enhanced by phosphorylation and low iron concentrations (1, 2, 14–16). Such results can explain the increased IRP1 binding to IRE-mRNAs and increased translational repression when iron concentrations are abnormally low. However, the mechanism to explain dissociation of IRE-RNA·IRP complexes, thereby allowing ribosome assembly and increased proteosomal degradation of IRPs (1, 2, 14, 15) (Fig. 1A), when high iron concentrations are abnormally high, is currently unknown.Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.IRE-RNA·IRP complexes and a model for depression by excess iron. A, a representative model of iron-induced translation of 5′-UTR IRE-RNAs. This figure is modified from Ref. 7. B, IRE-RNA sites influenced by metal binding related to the crystal structure of the ferritin-IRE-RNA·IRP complex from Ref. 13. The figure was created by T. Tosha using Discovery Studio 1.6 and Protein Data Bank file 2IPY. ■, hydrated Mg²⁺, determined by solution NMR; ▴, Cu¹⁺-1.10-phenanthroline, determined by RNA cleavage in O₂.Metal ion binding changes conformation and function of most RNA classes, e.g. rRNA (17), tRNA (18, 19), ribozymes (20–23), riboswitches (24, 25), possibly hammerhead mRNAs in mammals (26), and proteins. Although the effects of metal ion binding on eukaryotic mRNAs have not been extensively studied, Mg²⁺ is known to cause changes in conformation, shown by changes in radical cleavage sites of IRE-RNA with 1,10-phenanthrolene-iron and proton shifts in the one-dimensional NMR spectrum (12, 27). The Mg²⁺ effects are observed at low magnesium concentrations (0.1–0.5 mm) and low molar stoichiometries (1:1 and 2:1 = Mg:RNA).We hypothesized that Fe²⁺ could directly change the binding of the IRE-mRNA to the iron regulatory protein for several reasons. First, other metal ions influence the IRE-RNA structure (12, 27). Second, in IRE-RNA/IRP cocrystals there are exposed RNA sites in the IRE-RNA/IRP complex that are accessible for interactions (13) (Fig. 1B). Third, regions in the IRE-RNA are hypersensitive to Fe²⁺-EDTA/ascorbate/H₂O₂, suggesting selective interactions with metals and/or solvent (28). We now report that Fe²⁺ weakens IRE-RNA/IRP binding, whereas Mg²⁺ requires 100 times the concentration and Mn²⁺ is comparable with Fe²⁺; the Fe²⁺ effect was diminished in mutant IRE-RNA and IRE-RNA selective in wild type sequences: ferritin IRE-RNA > mt-aconitase IRE-RNA.     

Genetic Analysis of the nuo Locus,Which Encodes the Proton-Translocating NADH Dehydrogenase in Escherichia coli

Complex I (EC 1.6.99.3) of the bacterium Escherichia coli is considered to be the minimal form of the type I NADH dehydrogenase, the first enzyme complex in the respiratory chain. Because of its small size and relative simplicity, the E. coli enzyme has become a model used to identify and characterize the mechanism(s) by which cells regulate the synthesis and assembly of this large respiratory complex. To begin dissecting the processes by which E. coli cells regulate the expression of nuo and the assembly of complex I, we undertook a genetic analysis of the nuo locus, which encodes the 14 Nuo subunits comprising E. coli complex I. Here we present the results of studies, performed on an isogenic collection of nuo mutants, that focus on the physiological, biochemical, and molecular consequences caused by the lack of or defects in several Nuo subunits. In particular, we present evidence that NuoG, a peripheral subunit, is essential for complex I function and that it plays a role in the regulation of nuo expression and/or the assembly of complex I.

Complex I (NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase; EC 1.6.99.3), a type I NADH dehydrogenase that couples the oxidation of NADH to the generation of a proton motive force, is the first enzyme complex of the respiratory chain (2, 35, 47). The Escherichia coli enzyme, considered to be the minimal form of complex I, consists of 14 subunits instead of the 40 to 50 subunits associated with the homologous eukaryotic mitochondrial enzyme (17, 29, 30, 48–50). E. coli also possesses a second NADH dehydrogenase, NDH-II, which does not generate a proton motive force (31). E. coli complex I resembles eukaryotic complex I in many ways (16, 17, 30, 49): it performs the same enzymatic reaction and is sensitive to a number of the same inhibitors, it consists of subunits homologous to those found in all proton-translocating NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductases studied thus far, it is comprised of a large number of subunits relative to the number that comprise other respiratory enzymes, and it contains flavin mononucleotide and FeS center prosthetic groups. Additionally, it possesses an L-shaped topology (14, 22) like that of its Neurospora crassa homolog (27), and it consists of distinct fragments or subcomplexes. Whereas eukaryotic complex I can be dissected into a peripheral arm and a membrane arm, the E. coli enzyme consists of three subcomplexes referred to as the peripheral, connecting, and membrane fragments (29) (Fig. ​(Fig.1A).1A). The subunit composition of these three fragments correlates approximately with the organization of the 14 structural genes (nuoA to nuoN) (49) of the nuo (for NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase) locus (Fig. ​(Fig.1B),1B), an organization that is conserved in several other bacteria, including Salmonella typhimurium (3), Paracoccus denitrificans (53), Rhodobacter capsulatus (12), and Thermus thermophilus (54). The 5′ half of the locus contains a promoter (nuoP), previously identified and located upstream of nuoA (8, 49), and the majority of genes that encode subunits homologous to the nucleus-encoded subunits of eukaryotic complex I and to subunits of the Alcaligenes eutrophus NAD-reducing hydrogenase (17, 29, 30, 49). In contrast, the 3′ half contains the majority of the genes that encode subunits homologous to the mitochondrion-encoded subunits of eukaryotic complex I and to subunits of the E. coli formate-hydrogen lyase complex (17, 29, 30, 49). Whereas the nuclear homologs NuoE, NuoF, and NuoG constitute the peripheral fragment (also referred to as the NADH dehydrogenase fragment [NDF]), the nuclear homologs NuoB, NuoC, NuoD, and NuoI constitute the connecting fragment. The mitochondrial homologs NuoA, NuoH, NuoJ, NuoK, NuoL, NuoM, and NuoN constitute the membrane fragment (29). E. coli complex I likely evolved by fusion of preexisting protein assemblies constituting modules for electron transfer and proton translocation (17–19, 30). Open in a separate windowFIG. 1Schematic of E. coli complex I and the nuo locus. Adapted with permission of the publisher (17, 29, 30, 49). (A) E. coli complex I is comprised of three distinct fragments: the peripheral (light gray), connecting (white), and membrane (dark gray) fragments (17, 29). The peripheral fragment (NDF) is comprised of the nuclear homologs NuoE, -F, and -G and exhibits NADH dehydrogenase activity that oxidizes NADH to NAD⁺; the connecting fragment is comprised of the nuclear homologs NuoB, -C, -D, and -I; and the membrane fragment is comprised of the mitochondrial homologs NuoA, -H, and -J to -N and catalyzes ubiquinone (Q) to its reduced form (QH₂). FMN, flavin mononucleotide. (B) The E. coli nuo locus encodes the 14 Nuo subunits that constitute complex I. The 5′ half of the locus contains a previously identified promoter (nuoP) and the majority of genes that encode the peripheral and connecting subunits (light gray and white, respectively). The 3′ half of the locus contains the majority of the genes encoding the membrane subunits (dark gray). The 3′ end of nuoG encodes a C-Terminal region (CTR) of the NuoG subunit (hatched).Because of its smaller size and relative simplicity, researchers recently have begun to utilize complex I of E. coli, and that of its close relative S. typhimurium, to identify and characterize the mechanism(s) by which cells regulate the synthesis and assembly of this large respiratory complex (3, 8, 46) and to investigate the diverse physiological consequences caused by defects in this enzyme (4, 6, 10, 40, 59). Such defects affect the ability of cells to perform chemotaxis (40), to grow on certain carbon sources (4, 6, 10, 40, 57), to survive stationary phase (59), to perform energy-dependent proteolysis (4), to regulate the expression of at least one gene (32), and to maintain virulence (5).To begin dissecting the processes by which E. coli cells regulate the expression of nuo and the assembly of complex I, we undertook a genetic analysis of the nuo locus. Here, we present the results of studies, performed on an isogenic collection of nuo mutants, that focus on the physiological, biochemical, and molecular consequences caused by the lack of or defects in several Nuo subunits. In particular, we present evidence that NuoG, a peripheral subunit, is essential for complex I function and that it plays a role in the regulation of nuo expression and/or the assembly of complex I.     

A Straight Path to Circular Proteins

Folding and stability are parameters that control protein behavior. The possibility of conferring additional stability on proteins has implications for their use in vivo and for their structural analysis in the laboratory. Cyclic polypeptides ranging in size from 14 to 78 amino acids occur naturally and often show enhanced resistance toward denaturation and proteolysis when compared with their linear counterparts. Native chemical ligation and intein-based methods allow production of circular derivatives of larger proteins, resulting in improved stability and refolding properties. Here we show that circular proteins can be made reversibly with excellent efficiency by means of a sortase-catalyzed cyclization reaction, requiring only minimal modification of the protein to be circularized.Sortases are bacterial enzymes that predominantly catalyze the attachment of surface proteins to the bacterial cell wall (1, 2). Other sortases polymerize pilin subunits for the construction of the covalently stabilized and covalently anchored pilus of the Gram-positive bacterium (3–5). The reaction catalyzed by sortase involves the recognition of short 5-residue sequence motifs, which are cleaved by the enzyme with the concomitant formation of an acyl enzyme intermediate between the active site cysteine of sortase and the carboxylate at the newly generated C terminus of the substrate (1, 6–8). In many bacteria, this covalent intermediate can be resolved by nucleophilic attack from the pentaglycine side chain in a peptidoglycan precursor, resulting in the formation of an amide bond between the pentaglycine side chain and the carboxylate at the cleavage site in the substrate (9, 10). In pilus construction, alternative nucleophiles such as lysine residues or diaminopimelic acid participate in the transpeptidation reaction (3, 4).When appended near the C terminus of proteins that are not natural sortase substrates, the recognition sequence of Staphylococcus aureus sortase A (LPXTG) can be used to effectuate a sortase-catalyzed transpeptidation reaction using a diverse array of artificial glycine-based nucleophiles (Fig. 1). The result is efficient installation of a diverse set of moieties, including lipids (11), carbohydrates (12), peptide nucleic acids (13), biotin (14), fluorophores (14, 15), polymers (16), solid supports (16–18), or peptides (15, 19) at the C terminus of the protein substrate. During the course of our studies to further expand sortase-based protein engineering, we were struck by the frequency and relative ease with which intramolecular transpeptidation reactions were occurring. Specifically, proteins equipped with not only the LPXTG motif but also N-terminal glycine residues yielded covalently closed circular polypeptides (Fig. 1). Similar reactivity using sortase has been described in two previous cases; however, rigorous characterization of the circular polypeptides was absent (16, 20). The circular proteins in these reports were observed as minor components of more complex reaction mixtures, and the cyclization reaction itself was not optimized.Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.Protein substrates equipped with a sortase A recognition sequence (LPXTG) can participate in intermolecular transpeptidation with synthetic oligoglycine nucleophiles (left) or intramolecular transpeptidation if an N-terminal glycine residue is present (right).Here we describe our efforts toward applying sortase-catalyzed transpeptidation to the synthesis of circular and oligomeric proteins. This method has general applicability, as illustrated by successful intramolecular reactions with three structurally unrelated proteins. In addition to circularization of individual protein units, the multiprotein complex AAA-ATPase p97/VCP/CDC48, with six identical subunits containing the LPXTG motif and an N-terminal glycine, was found to preferentially react in daisy chain fashion to yield linear protein fusions. The reaction exploited here shows remarkable similarities to the mechanisms proposed for circularization of cyclotides, small circular proteins that have been isolated from plants (21–23).