A Small Conserved Domain in the Yeast Spa2p Is Necessary and Sufficient for Its Polarized Localization

SPA2 encodes a yeast protein that is one of the first proteins to localize to sites of polarized growth, such as the shmoo tip and the incipient bud. The dynamics and requirements for Spa2p localization in living cells are examined using Spa2p green fluorescent protein fusions. Spa2p localizes to one edge of unbudded cells and subsequently is observable in the bud tip. Finally, during cytokinesis Spa2p is present as a ring at the mother–daughter bud neck. The bud emergence mutants bem1 and bem2 and mutants defective in the septins do not affect Spa2p localization to the bud tip. Strikingly, a small domain of Spa2p comprised of 150 amino acids is necessary and sufficient for localization to sites of polarized growth. This localization domain and the amino terminus of Spa2p are essential for its function in mating. Searching the yeast genome database revealed a previously uncharacterized protein which we name, Sph1p (Spa2p homolog), with significant homology to the localization domain and amino terminus of Spa2p. This protein also localizes to sites of polarized growth in budding and mating cells. SPH1, which is similar to SPA2, is required for bipolar budding and plays a role in shmoo formation. Overexpression of either Spa2p or Sph1p can block the localization of either protein fused to green fluorescent protein, suggesting that both Spa2p and Sph1p bind to and are localized by the same component. The identification of a 150–amino acid domain necessary and sufficient for localization of Spa2p to sites of polarized growth and the existence of this domain in another yeast protein Sph1p suggest that the early localization of these proteins may be mediated by a receptor that recognizes this small domain.Polarized cell growth and division are essential cellular processes that play a crucial role in the development of eukaryotic organisms. Cell fate can be determined by cell asymmetry during cell division (Horvitz and Herskowitz, 1992; Cohen and Hyman, 1994; Rhyu and Knoblich, 1995). Consequently, the molecules involved in the generation and maintenance of cell asymmetry are important in the process of cell fate determination. Polarized growth can occur in response to external signals such as growth towards a nutrient (Rodriguez-Boulan and Nelson, 1989; Eaton and Simons, 1995) or hormone (Jackson and Hartwell, 1990a , b ; Segall, 1993; Keynes and Cook, 1995) and in response to internal signals as in Caenorhabditis elegans (Goldstein et al., 1993; Kimble, 1994; Priess, 1994) and Drosophila melanogaster (St Johnston and Nusslein-Volhard, 1992; Anderson, 1995) early development. Saccharomyces cerevisiae undergo polarized growth towards an external cue during mating and to an internal cue during budding. Polarization towards a mating partner (shmoo formation) and towards a new bud site requires a number of proteins (Chenevert, 1994; Chant, 1996; Drubin and Nelson, 1996). Many of these proteins are necessary for both processes and are localized to sites of polarized growth, identified by the insertion of new cell wall material (Tkacz and Lampen, 1972; Farkas et al., 1974; Lew and Reed, 1993) to the shmoo tip, bud tip, and mother–daughter bud neck. In yeast, proteins localized to growth sites include cytoskeletal proteins (Adams and Pringle, 1984; Kilmartin and Adams, 1984; Ford, S.K., and J.R. Pringle. 1986. Yeast. 2:S114; Drubin et al., 1988; Snyder, 1989; Snyder et al., 1991; Amatruda and Cooper, 1992; Lew and Reed, 1993; Waddle et al., 1996), neck filament components (septins) (Byers and Goetsch, 1976; Kim et al., 1991; Ford and Pringle, 1991; Haarer and Pringle, 1987; Longtine et al., 1996), motor proteins (Lillie and Brown, 1994), G-proteins (Ziman, 1993; Yamochi et al., 1994; Qadota et al., 1996), and two membrane proteins (Halme et al., 1996; Roemer et al., 1996; Qadota et al., 1996). Septins, actin, and actin-associated proteins localize early in the cell cycle, before a bud or shmoo tip is recognizable. How this group of proteins is localized to and maintained at sites of cell growth remains unclear.Spa2p is one of the first proteins involved in bud formation to localize to the incipient bud site before a bud is recognizable (Snyder, 1989; Snyder et al., 1991; Chant, 1996). Spa2p has been localized to where a new bud will form at approximately the same time as actin patches concentrate at this region (Snyder et al., 1991). An understanding of how Spa2p localizes to incipient bud sites will shed light on the very early stages of cell polarization. Later in the cell cycle, Spa2p is also found at the mother–daughter bud neck in cells undergoing cytokinesis. Spa2p, a nonessential protein, has been shown to be involved in bud site selection (Snyder, 1989; Zahner et al., 1996), shmoo formation (Gehrung and Snyder, 1990), and mating (Gehrung and Snyder, 1990; Chenevert et al., 1994; Yorihuzi and Ohsumi, 1994; Dorer et al., 1995). Genetic studies also suggest that Spa2p has a role in cytokinesis (Flescher et al., 1993), yet little is known about how this protein is localized to sites of polarized growth.We have used Spa2p green fluorescent protein (GFP)¹ fusions to investigate the early localization of Spa2p to sites of polarized growth in living cells. Our results demonstrate that a small domain of ∼150 amino acids of this large 1,466-residue protein is sufficient for targeting to sites of polarized growth and is necessary for Spa2p function. Furthermore, we have identified and characterized a novel yeast protein, Sph1p, which has homology to both the Spa2p amino terminus and the Spa2p localization domain. Sph1p localizes to similar regions of polarized growth and sph1 mutants have similar phenotypes as spa2 mutants.     

Evidence of a Role for Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase Activation in the Blocking of Apoptosis by Polyomavirus Middle T Antigen

A polyomavirus mutant (315YF) blocked in binding phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI 3-kinase) has previously been shown to be partially deficient in transformation and to induce fewer tumors and with a significant delay compared to wild-type virus. The role of polyomavirus middle T antigen-activated PI 3-kinase in apoptosis was investigated as a possible cause of this behavior. When grown in medium containing 1d-3-deoxy-3-fluoro-myo-inositol to block formation of 3′-phosphorylated phosphatidylinositols, F111 rat fibroblasts transformed by wild-type polyomavirus (PyF), but not normal F111 cells, showed a marked loss of viability with evidence of apoptosis. Similarly, treatment with wortmannin, an inhibitor of PI 3-kinase, stimulated apoptosis in PyF cells but not in normal cells. Activation of Akt, a serine/threonine kinase whose activity has been correlated with regulation of apoptosis, was roughly twofold higher in F111 cells transformed by either wild-type virus or mutant 250YS blocked in binding Shc compared to cells transformed by mutant 315YF. In the same cells, levels of apoptosis were inversely correlated with Akt activity. Apoptosis induced by serum withdrawal in Rat-1 cells expressing a temperature-sensitive p53 was shown to be at least partially p53 independent. Expression of either wild-type or 250YS middle T antigen inhibited apoptosis in serum-starved Rat-1 cells at both permissive and restrictive temperatures for p53. Mutant 315YF middle T antigen was partially defective for inhibition of apoptosis in these cells. The results indicate that unlike other DNA tumor viruses which block apoptosis by inactivation of p53, polyomavirus achieves protection from apoptotic death through a middle T antigen–PI 3-kinase–Akt pathway that is at least partially p53 independent.Programmed cell death occurs during normal development and under certain pathological conditions. In mammalian cells, apoptosis can be induced by a variety of stimuli, including DNA damage (45), virus infection (54, 57), oncogene activation (25), and serum withdrawal (34, 37). Apoptosis can also be blocked by a number of factors, including adenovirus E1B 55- or 19-kDa proteins (9, 16), baculovirus p35 and iap genes (10), Bcl-2 (36, 61), and survival factors (12, 21). DNA tumor viruses have evolved mechanisms that both trigger and inhibit apoptosis. These frequently involve binding and inactivation of tumor suppressor proteins. E7 in some papillomaviruses (22), E1A in adenovirus (31, 43, 64), and large T antigen in simian virus 40 (SV40) (17) bind Rb and/or p300 and lead to upregulation of p53, which is thought to trigger apoptosis in virus-infected cells. The same viruses also inhibit apoptosis by inactivating p53 by various mechanisms (44, 63, 67). In contrast, the mechanism by which polyomavirus interacts with apoptotic pathways in the cell is not known; no direct interaction with p53 by any of the proteins encoded by this virus has been demonstrated (19, 62).The principal oncoprotein of polyomavirus is the middle T antigen. Neoplastic transformation by polyomavirus middle T antigen has as a central feature its association with and activation of members of the Src family of tyrosine kinases p60^c-src (13) and p62^c-yes (42). The major known consequence of these interactions is phosphorylation of middle T antigen on specific tyrosine residues creating binding sites for other signaling proteins. Phosphorylation at tyrosines 250, 315, and 322 promotes binding to Shc (18), the p85 regulatory subunit of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI 3-kinase) (59), and phospholipase Cγ-1 (58), respectively. Recognition of multiple signaling pathways emanating from middle T antigen has led to a keen interest in identifying their downstream biochemical effects, which collectively lead to the emergence of neoplastic transformation and presumably underlie the dramatic ability of the virus to induce many kinds of tumors in the mouse.Previous work has shown that the binding of PI 3-kinase to middle T antigen is essential for full transformation of rat fibroblasts in culture (8) and for rapid development of a broad spectrum of tumors in mice (30), for translocation of the GLUT1 transporter (68), and activation of p70 S6 kinase (14). While the mutant 315YF (blocked in PI 3-kinase activation) was able to induce some tumors, it did so at reduced frequencies and with an average latency three times longer than that of either the wild-type virus or a mutant, 250YS, blocked in binding Shc (4, 30). Recent studies have indicated a role of PI 3-kinase in blocking apoptosis in nonviral systems. Growth factor receptors acting through protein tyrosine kinases may prevent apoptosis by activating PI 3-kinase in PC12 cells, T lymphocytes, hematopoietic progenitors, and rat fibroblasts (7, 48, 56, 65, 66). The failure of mutant 315YF to induce full transformation of cells in culture and to induce the rapid development of tumors in mice could therefore be related, at least in part, to a failure to block apoptosis. In this study, we focus on the question of whether middle T antigen–PI 3-kinase interaction is involved in blocking apoptosis in cells transformed by polyomavirus.     

Use of Quantitative Mass Spectrometric Analysis to Elucidate the Mechanisms of Phospho-priming and Auto-activation of the Checkpoint Kinase Rad53 in Vivo

The cell cycle checkpoint kinases play central roles in the genome maintenance of eukaryotes. Activation of the yeast checkpoint kinase Rad53 involves Rad9 or Mrc1 adaptor-mediated phospho-priming by Mec1 kinase, followed by auto-activating phosphorylation within its activation loop. However, the mechanisms by which these adaptors regulate priming phosphorylation of specific sites and how this then leads to Rad53 activation remain poorly understood. Here we used quantitative mass spectrometry to delineate the stepwise phosphorylation events in the activation of endogenous Rad53 in response to S phase alkylation DNA damage, and we show that the two Rad9 and Mrc1 adaptors, the four N-terminal Mec1-target TQ sites of Rad53 (Rad53-SCD1), and Rad53-FHA2 coordinate intimately for optimal priming phosphorylation to support substantial Rad53 auto-activation. Rad9 or Mrc1 alone can mediate surprisingly similar Mec1 target site phosphorylation patterns of Rad53, including previously undetected tri- and tetraphosphorylation of Rad53-SCD1. Reducing the number of TQ motifs turns the SCD1 into a proportionally poorer Mec1 target, which then requires the presence of both Mrc1 and Rad9 for sufficient priming and auto-activation. The phosphothreonine-interacting Rad53-FHA domains, particularly FHA2, regulate phospho-priming by interacting with the checkpoint mediators but do not seem to play a major role in the phospho-SCD1-dependent auto-activation step. Finally, mutation of all four SCD1 TQ motifs greatly reduces Rad53 activation but does not eliminate it, and residual Rad53 activity in this mutant is dependent on Rad9 but not Mrc1. Altogether, our results provide a paradigm for how phosphorylation site clusters and checkpoint mediators can be involved in the regulation of signaling relay in protein kinase cascades in vivo and elucidate an SCD1-independent Rad53 auto-activation mechanism through the Rad9 pathway. The work also demonstrates the power of mass spectrometry for in-depth analyses of molecular mechanisms in cellular signaling in vivo.Eukaryotic cells are most vulnerable to exogenous DNA-damaging agents during the S phase of the cell cycle, when unprogrammed DNA lesions interfere with the tightly choreographed DNA replication process. DNA damage during this phase leads to the activation of two overlapping checkpoint pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the DNA replication checkpoint and the intra-S-phase DNA damage checkpoint (1, 2). Phospho-priming for auto-activation of the central checkpoint kinase Rad53 by the upstream kinase Mec1/Tel1 depends on Mrc1 as an adaptor in the DNA replication checkpoint pathway and Rad9 as an adaptor in the DNA damage checkpoint pathway (3–10). Rad53, a well-accepted model system for studying the function and regulation of Chk2-like kinases, contains two forkhead-associated (FHA)¹ domains (FHA1 and -2) and two SQ/TQ cluster domains (SCD1 and -2) enriched in Mec1/Tel1-target phosphorylation sites (11–13).Mrc1 normally is a replisome component that functionally couples DNA Pol ε with Cdc45 and MCM helicase during replication fork progression (14, 15). As the replication forks are stalled by replication stress, the recruited checkpoint sensor kinase Mec1 phosphorylates the SCD of Mrc1, which abolishes its N-terminal interaction with Pol ε and enables Mrc1 to recruit Rad53 and promote Rad53 phosphorylation by Mec1 as an initial step in the activation of Rad53 in the Mrc1 branch (6, 14, 16). Alanine substitution of all Mec1 target sites of Mrc1 (designated the mrc1-AQ allele) has been shown to selectively disable its checkpoint function for Rad53 activation without affecting its DNA replication functions (4). In response to DNA damage, Rad9 is able to associate with damaged chromatin via its BRCT and Tudor domains, which tether it to Ser129-phosphorylated histone H2A (γH2A) and Lys79-methylated histone H3, respectively (17, 18). Alternatively, the recruitment of Rad9 onto damaged DNA could also be facilitated by its phosphorylation by CDK1, which enables the specific interaction of Rad9 with Dpb11, allowing the formation of the ternary complex of Dpb11, Mec1, and Rad9 (19, 20). Similar to Mrc1, Mec1 activates the adaptor function of Rad9 by phosphorylation of its SCD, which then binds to the Rad53-FHA domains to promote Rad53 phosphorylation by Mec1 (3, 5, 10).Beyond serving as scaffolds to recruit Rad53, Mrc1 and Rad9 have been shown to promote Rad53 phosphorylation by Mec1 in a dose-dependent manner in vitro (3, 16), underlining their adaptor role to enhance the enzyme–substrate (Mec1–Rad53) interaction. However, how they can specifically regulate the priming phosphorylation at specific sites and how this then leads to Rad53 activation remains poorly understood. Finally, hyperphosphorylated Rad9 has also been shown to catalyze the auto-phosphorylation of recombinant Rad53 (21), but it remains to be examined whether and how this occurs in vivo.The activation of SCD-FHA containing kinases such as human Chk2 and fission yeast Cds1 has been suggested to involve a two-step phosphorylation process: first, SCD phosphorylation by an ATM/ATR-like kinase leads to intermolecular binding to the FHA domain of another Chk2/Cds1 monomer, which then results in dimerization/oligomerization-dependent auto-phosphorylation within the kinase activation loop (22–26). In addition to the characteristic N-terminal SCD-FHA module of Chk2-like kinases, Rad53 contains another SCD2-FHA2 module C-terminal to its kinase domain. Similar to its orthologues, Rad53 activation has been proposed to depend on SCD1 phosphorylation (but not SCD2 phosphorylation) and partially redundant functions of the two FHA domains (9, 27–29). However, although Rad53-FHA1 can interact with SCD1 in a phospho-threonine (pT)-dependent manner in vitro (9, 28), it appears to be required for Rad53 activation only in G2/M-arrested cells (27, 29). In contrast, the FHA2 domain, which seems to be more important overall for Rad53 activation, does not appreciably bind phospho-SCD1 peptides in vitro (27, 28). Thus, the mechanisms by which Mrc1, Rad9, SCD1 phosphorylation, and FHA domains interact during checkpoint-dependent Rad53 priming and auto-activation remain to be elucidated.Quantitative mass spectrometric analysis has revolutionized the functional analysis of cellular signaling pathways, including site-specific phosphorylation events of key signaling molecules (30–33), but an important caveat is that MS studies often involve protein tags or nonphysiological expression levels that can interfere with normal protein functions. For example, the integration of a triple HA tag into the endogenous RAD53 gene locus has been shown to reduce Rad53 protein levels, resulting in significantly altered checkpoint activity (34). In this study we used quantitative MS analyses to dissect the stepwise phosphorylation events of endogenous, untagged Rad53 in response to MMS-induced alkylation DNA damage and replication stress during the S phase. Together with functional analyses, our results delineate how the two Mec1 adaptors Rad9 and Mrc1 can coordinate with the four SCD1 priming sites (T5, T8, T12, and T15) to regulate the phospho-priming of Rad53 by Mec1. In addition, an SCD1-priming independent Rad53 auto-activation mechanism and the specific roles of the FHA domains during Rad53 hyperphosphorylation are also elucidated in this work.     

Identification of rCop-1, a New Member of the CCN Protein Family,as a Negative Regulator for Cell Transformation

By using a model system for cell transformation mediated by the cooperation of the activated H-ras oncogene and the inactivated p53 tumor suppressor gene, rCop-1 was identified by mRNA differential display as a gene whose expression became lost after cell transformation. Homology analysis indicates that rCop-1 belongs to an emerging cysteine-rich growth regulator family called CCN, which includes connective-tissue growth factor, CYR61, CEF10 (v-src inducible), and the product of the nov proto-oncogene. Unlike the other members of the CCN gene family, rCop-1 is not an immediate-early gene, it lacks the conserved C-terminal domain which was shown to confer both growth-stimulating and heparin-binding activities, and its expression is lost in cells transformed by a variety of mechanisms. Ectopic expression of rCop-1 by retroviral gene transfers led to cell death in a transformation-specific manner. These results suggest that rCop-1 represents a new class of CCN family proteins that have functions opposing those of the previously identified members.Oncogenic conversion of a normal cell into a tumor cell requires multiple genetic alterations (12). Of particular interest is the fact that mutations in both ras oncogenes (3) and the p53 tumor suppressor gene cooperate in transformation of mammalian cells (11). Mutations in both ras and the p53 gene were also found at high frequencies in a variety of human cancers, including those of the colon, lung, and pancreas (2, 18). It has been proposed that both p53 and Ras function, whether directly or through other signaling molecules, to control expression of genes that are important for cell growth and differentiation (13, 17, 37). To this end, several ras target genes (10) and p53 target genes, including those encoding p21/CIP1/WAF1, an inhibitor of G₁ cyclin-dependent kinase (9); Mdm-2, a negative regulator of p53 (1); GADD45, a protein involved in DNA repair (36); and Bax, which promotes apoptosis (28), have been identified. Most of these genes, except p21/CIP1/WAF1, which was cloned by subtractive hybridization, were identified by the candidate gene hypothesis. Recently, more p53 target genes have been isolated by the differential display technique, including those coding for cyclin G (31); MAP4, a microtubule-associated protein negatively regulated by p53 (29); and PAG608, a novel nuclear zinc finger protein whose overexpression promotes apoptosis (14). Functional characterizations of these genes have shed light on the role of p53 in cell cycle control and apoptosis. However, genes that mediate tumor suppression activity by p53 remain elusive.The fact that neither the inactivation of p53 nor the activation of Ras alone is able to transform primary mammalian cells (34), whereas both mutations together can do so, suggests that genes regulated by p53 and Ras cooperate in upsetting normal cell growth control cells (11). Using differential display (22), we set out to identify genes whose expression is altered by both mutant ras and p53 by comparing the mRNA expression profiles of normal rat embryo fibroblasts (REFs) and their derivatives transformed by either a constitutively inactivated or a temperature-sensitive mutant p53 in cooperation with the activated H-ras oncogene (11, 27). In this report we describe the identification and give a functional characterization of rCop-1, a gene whose expression is abolished by cell transformation. By sequence homology, rCop-1 was found to belong to an emerging cysteine-rich growth regulator family called CCN (which stands for connective-tissue growth factor [CTGF], CEF10/Cyr61, and Nov) (4). Here we show that rCop-1 may represent a novel class of CCN family proteins based on its unique cell cycle expression pattern, its lack of the C-terminal (CT) domain conserved in all CCN proteins, its loss of expression in all transformed cells analyzed, and its ability to confer cytotoxicity to the transformed cells.