Two Regions of Simian Virus 40 T Antigen Determine Cooperativity of Double-Hexamer Assembly on the Viral Origin of DNA Replication and Promote Hexamer Interactions during Bidirectional Origin DNA Unwinding

Phosphorylation of simian virus 40 large tumor (T) antigen on threonine 124 is essential for viral DNA replication. A mutant T antigen (T124A), in which this threonine was replaced by alanine, has helicase activity, assembles double hexamers on viral-origin DNA, and locally distorts the origin DNA structure, but it cannot catalyze origin DNA unwinding. A class of T-antigen mutants with single-amino-acid substitutions in the DNA binding domain (class 4) has remarkably similar properties, although these proteins are phosphorylated on threonine 124, as we show here. By comparing the DNA binding properties of the T124A and class 4 mutant proteins with those of the wild type, we demonstrate that mutant double hexamers bind to viral origin DNA with reduced cooperativity. We report that T124A T-antigen subunits impair the ability of double hexamers containing the wild-type protein to unwind viral origin DNA, suggesting that interactions between hexamers are also required for unwinding. Moreover, the T124A and class 4 mutant T antigens display dominant-negative inhibition of the viral DNA replication activity of the wild-type protein. We propose that interactions between hexamers, mediated through the DNA binding domain and the N-terminal phosphorylated region of T antigen, play a role in double-hexamer assembly and origin DNA unwinding. We speculate that one surface of the DNA binding domain in each subunit of one hexamer may form a docking site that can interact with each subunit in the other hexamer, either directly with the N-terminal phosphorylated region or with another region that is regulated by phosphorylation.

The initiation of simian virus 40 (SV40) DNA replication by the viral T antigen is a complex series of events that begins when T antigen binds specifically to a palindromic arrangement of four GAGGC pentanucleotide sequences in the minimal origin of viral DNA replication (recently reviewed in references 1, 2, 3, 22, and 48). In the presence of Mg-ATP, T antigen assembles cooperatively on the two halves of the palindrome as a double hexamer (10, 11, 13, 24, 30, 38, 51, 53). The DNA conformation flanking the T-antigen binding sites is locally distorted upon hexamer assembly (reference 7 and references therein). One pair of pentanucleotides is sufficient to direct double-hexamer assembly and local distortion of the origin DNA but not to initiate DNA replication (25). ATP hydrolysis by T-antigen hexamers then catalyzes bidirectional unwinding of the parental DNA (reference 53 and references therein). A mutant origin with a single nucleotide insertion in the center of the palindromic T-antigen binding site prevents cooperative interactions between hexamers and cannot support bidirectional origin unwinding (8, 51), suggesting that both processes require interactions between T-antigen hexamers. After assembly of the two replication forks, bidirectional replication is carried out by 10 cellular proteins and T antigen, which remains at the forks as the only essential helicase (reviewed in references 3, 22, and 48).The phosphorylation state of SV40 T antigen governs its ability to initiate viral DNA replication (reviewed in references 15 to 17 and 39). T antigen contains two clusters of phosphorylation sites located at the N and C termini (40, 41). Phosphorylation of T antigen on threonine 124 in the N-terminal cluster was shown to be essential for viral DNA replication in monkey cells and in vitro (5, 14, 32–36, 44). Efforts to define what step in viral DNA replication requires modification of threonine 124 revealed that Mg-ATP-induced hexamer formation of T antigen in solution and DNA helicase activity of T antigen did not require phosphorylation at this site (33, 36). Origin DNA binding of T antigen lacking the modification at residue 124 was weaker than that of the modified T antigen (33, 34, 36, 44), but the reduction in binding was modest under the conditions used for SV40 DNA replication in vitro (36). Moreover, a mutant T antigen containing alanine in place of the phosphorylated threonine (T124A) assembled as a double hexamer on the viral origin and altered the conformation of the early palindrome and AT-rich sequences flanking the T-antigen binding sites in the viral origin in the same manner as the wild-type protein, except that higher concentrations were required (36). However, even at an elevated concentration, these mutant double hexamers were unable to unwind closed circular duplex DNA containing the viral origin (33, 36), suggesting that the defect in unwinding was responsible for the inability of T124A T antigen to replicate SV40 DNA. One possible explanation for the unwinding defect of the mutant T antigen, despite its helicase activity, was that some essential interaction between the two hexamers during bidirectional unwinding depended upon phosphorylation of threonine 124. Electron micrographs of SV40 DNA unwinding intermediates, which showed two single-stranded DNA loops protruding between two hexamers of T antigen, provided support for this explanation, implying that a double hexamer pulled the parental duplex DNA into the protein complex and spooled the single-stranded DNA out (53). Furthermore, double-hexamer formation significantly enhanced the helicase activity of T antigen (47, 47a).Most of the T antigen isolated from mammalian cells is in a hyperphosphorylated form, containing multiple phosphoserines, as well as two phosphothreonines, and supports SV40 DNA replication in vitro poorly but can be stimulated by treatment with alkaline phosphatase or protein phosphatase 2A (19, 28, 37, 42, 49, 50). Hyperphosphorylated T antigen is unable to unwind duplex closed circular duplex DNA harboring the viral origin (4, 6, 51). Dephosphorylation of serines 120 and 123 restores its ability to unwind origin DNA (14, 43, 51). Studies of double-hexamer assembly on the origin indicate that phosphorylation of T antigen on serines 120 and 123 also impairs the cooperativity of double-hexamer assembly (14, 51). These results demonstrate that hyperphosphorylation of T antigen interferes with interactions between hexamers that are required for origin unwinding and raise the question of whether the phosphorylation state of threonine 124 might also affect the cooperativity of double-hexamer assembly on the viral origin.One class of T antigen mutants with single-amino-acid substitutions in the DNA binding domain (class 4) has been reported to display properties similar to those of the T124A mutant and the hyperphosphorylated form of T antigen (54). Class 4 mutant proteins are defective in viral DNA replication in vivo and in vitro, bind to the viral origin as double hexamers and alter the local DNA conformation, and have helicase activity but do not unwind closed circular duplex viral DNA. The replication and unwinding defects could be due to faulty phosphorylation patterns or to other malfunctions not dependent on phosphorylation status.The work presented here was undertaken to reevaluate the assembly of wild-type and T124A T antigen on SV40 origin DNA by using more-sensitive quantitative assays and to compare them with the class 4 mutants. We report that cooperativity of T124A T antigen in double-hexamer assembly on the viral origin is impaired. The class 4 mutant T antigens were also found to have defects in cooperativity of double-hexamer assembly. T124A T antigen inhibited the ability of the wild-type protein to unwind closed circular duplex origin DNA. Both T124A and the class 4 mutants displayed dominant-negative phenotypes in viral DNA replication in vitro. Based on these observations, we propose that the N-terminal cluster of phosphorylation sites and the DNA binding domain mediate cooperative hexamer-hexamer interactions during assembly on the viral origin and speculate that these regions of T antigen may interact during origin DNA unwinding.     

Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen Is Protected from Degradation by Forming a Complex with MutT Homolog2

Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) has been demonstrated to interact with multiple proteins involved in several metabolic pathways such as DNA replication and repair. However, there have been fewer reports about whether these PCNA-binding proteins influence stability of PCNA. Here, we observed a physical interaction between PCNA and MutT homolog2 (MTH2), a new member of the MutT-related proteins that hydrolyzes 8-oxo-7,8-dihydrodeoxyguanosine triphosphate (8-oxo-dGTP). In several unstressed human cancer cell lines and in normal human fibroblast cells, PCNA and MTH2 formed a complex and their mutual binding fragments were confirmed. It was intriguing that PCNA and MTH2 were dissociated dependent on acetylation of PCNA, which in turn induced degradation of PCNA in response to UV irradiation, but not in response to other forms of DNA-damaging stress. To further explore the link between dissociation of PCNA-MTH2 and degradation of PCNA, RNAi against MTH2 was performed to mimic the dissociated status of PCNA to evaluate changes in the half-life of PCNA. Knockdown of MTH2 significantly promoted degradation of PCNA, suggesting that the physiological interaction of PCNA-MTH2 may confer protection from degradation for PCNA, whereas UV irradiation accelerates PCNA degradation by inducing dissociation of PCNA-MTH2. Moreover, secondary to degradation of PCNA, UV-induced inhibition of DNA synthesis or cell cycle progression was enhanced. Collectively, our data demonstrate for the first time that PCNA is protected by this newly identified partner molecule MTH2, which is related to DNA synthesis and cell cycle progression.Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA)³ is a member of the DNA sliding clamp family and consists of a ring-shaped trimeric complex (1–3). Three PCNA monomers, each comprising two similar domains, are joined in a head-to-tail arrangement to form a closed ring (4, 5). Because of this unique structure, PCNA encircles the DNA double helix and slides freely along it. PCNA was originally characterized as a DNA polymerase processivity factor and it increases the processivity of DNA synthesis by interacting with polymerase δ (6, 7). Subsequent studies revealed that PCNA plays an important role in DNA replication (8, 9). For example, PCNA not only functions as a protein binding platform to interact with the DNA polymerases, flap endonuclease-1 (Fen1) or DNA ligase I (10–12), but also coordinates complicated processes in DNA replication (2, 13). In addition, PCNA also plays a role in DNA damage repair (14–17) and cell cycle control (18–20).Because PCNA is essential for DNA synthesis both in DNA replication and repair, a dynamic balance between PCNA synthesis and degradation is critical for maintaining normal DNA synthesis. Up-regulation of PCNA accelerates DNA synthesis and promotes cell proliferation, such that PCNA is regarded as a general proliferation marker in tumor development. On the other hand, degradation of PCNA leads to inhibition of DNA synthesis (9, 21). In this case, in response to inhibition of DNA synthesis by PCNA degradation, both cell proliferation and DNA repair are inhibited, and cells are thus subject to death.In Escherichia coli, MutT protein encoded by the mutT gene has 8-oxo-dGTPase activity, and hydrolyzes 8-oxo-dGTP to 8-oxo-dGMP, which is nonutilizable for DNA synthesis, thus preventing misincorporation of 8-oxo-dGTP into DNA (22). 8-Oxo-dGTP is a product of dGTP oxidation and can be inserted into opposite dA or dC residues of template DNA at almost equal efficiencies. As a result, G:C to T:A or T:A to G:C transversion mutations occur (22–24). In a mutT-deficient strain, the rate of spontaneous occurrence of A:T to C:G transversion increases by 1000-fold compared with that of cells with wild type mutT (25–27). Therefore, MutT protein is required for preventing mutations and maintaining high fidelity of DNA replication (28). In addition, RibA is a backup enzyme for MutT in E. coli and also plays a role in maintaining high fidelity of DNA replication (29). The MutT homologue MTH1 is the first MutT-related protein found in mammalian cells (30). The spontaneous mutation frequency in MTH1-deficient cells showed an increase of ∼2-fold as compared with that in wild type MTH1 cells (31). Comparing the mutation frequency in mutT-deficient E. coli cells with that in MTH1-deficient mammalian cells suggests that there must be other proteins responsible for preventing occurrence of high numbers of oxidative damage induced mutations in mammalian cells. By searching the GenBank^TM EST data base, our research group and others (32) have cloned a new member of MutT-related protein, MTH2. The increased mutation frequency in mutT-deficient cells was significantly reduced by overexpression of MTH2 cDNA (32). Therefore, MTH2 may help to ensure cells achieve accurate DNA synthesis. However, aside from the activity of 8-oxo-dGTPase, the exact mechanism by which MTH2 influences DNA synthesis has not been explored.The functions of both PCNA and MTH2 partially overlap in DNA synthesis, thus warranting exploration of whether MTH2 works together with PCNA to regulate DNA replication or repair. In this study, we found that MTH2 directly interacts with PCNA, and this interaction enhances PCNA stability. However, when cells were exposed to UV light, the interaction of MTH2 and PCNA was disrupted, and PCNA degradation was accelerated. Consequently, DNA synthesis was reduced, and cell cycling was arrested.     

Inhibition of Herpes Simplex Virus Replication by a 2-Amino Thiazole via Interactions with the Helicase Component of the UL5-UL8-UL52 Complex

With the use of a high-throughput biochemical DNA helicase assay as a screen, T157602, a 2-amino thiazole compound, was identified as a specific inhibitor of herpes simplex virus (HSV) DNA replication. T157602 inhibited reversibly the helicase activity of the HSV UL5-UL8-UL52 (UL5/8/52) helicase-primase complex with an IC₅₀ (concentration of compound that yields 50% inhibition) of 5 μM. T157602 inhibited specifically the UL5/8/52 helicase and not several other helicases. The primase activity of the UL5/8/52 complex was also inhibited by T157602 (IC₅₀ = 20 μM). T157602 inhibited HSV growth in a one-step viral growth assay (IC₉₀ = 3 μM), and plaque formation was completely prevented at concentrations of 25 to 50 μM T157602. Vero, human foreskin fibroblast (HFF), and Jurkat cells could be propagated in the presence of T157602 at concentrations exceeding 100 μM with no obvious cytotoxic effects, indicating that the window between antiviral activity and cellular toxicity is at least 33-fold. Seven independently derived T157602-resistant mutant viruses (four HSV type 2 and three HSV type 1) carried single base pair mutations in the UL5 that resulted in single amino acid changes in the UL5 protein. Marker rescue experiments demonstrated that the UL5 gene from T157602-resistant viruses conferred resistance to T157602-sensitive wild-type viruses. Recombinant UL5/8/52 helicase-primase complex purified from baculoviruses expressing mutant UL5 protein showed complete resistance to T157602 in the in vitro helicase assay. T157602 and its analogs represent a novel class of specific and reversible anti-HSV agents eliciting their inhibitory effects on HSV replication by interacting with the UL5 helicase.Herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 (HSV-1 and HSV-2) each comprise at least 77 genes whose expression is tightly regulated (42). These genes are assigned to four kinetic classes, designated as α, β, γ1, and γ2 on the basis of the timing of and requirements for their expression (46). The five α genes, α0, α4, α22, α27, and α47, are expressed first in the absence of viral protein synthesis and are responsible for the regulated expression of the other viral genes. The β genes require functional α gene products for their expression and encode proteins and enzymes that are directly involved in DNA synthesis and nucleotide metabolism. The γ genes form the last set of viral genes to be expressed, with the γ2 class having viral DNA replication as a strict requirement for their expression.The HSV genome contains three origins of replication (44, 45, 47, 48, 50, 54) and encodes seven viral proteins that are essential for DNA replication (34, 59). These include an origin binding protein (OBP) encoded by open reading frame (ORF) UL9 (14, 15, 17, 35), a DNA binding protein encoded by UL29 (40, 53, 54), a DNA polymerase encoded by ORF UL30 and its accessory factor encoded by UL42 (1, 4, 8, 18, 19, 21, 24, 37), and a heterotrimeric complex consisting of proteins encoded by ORFs UL5, UL8, and UL52, which include both 5′-to-3′ helicase activity and primase activity (10–12). Although extensively studied, the roles of the individual subunits of the helicase-primase complex and their specific interactions with each other have not been completely defined. However, several lines of evidence suggest that the UL5 gene encodes the helicase activity of the complex. Examination of the amino acid sequence of the UL5 protein revealed that it contains six conserved motifs that are found in many DNA and RNA helicases, two of these motifs defining an ATP binding site (20, 25, 32, 52, 61). Site-specific mutagenesis of amino acids within each of the six motifs revealed that all six are critical for the function of the UL5 protein as a helicase in transient replication assays (60, 61).The observation that recombinant UL5, UL52, and UL8 proteins could be purified from baculovirus-infected insect cells as a complex that displays DNA-dependent ATPase, helicase, and primase activities that are identical to those produced during a herpesvirus infection allowed functional and biochemical analyses of the individual components of the complex (10, 13, 38). Although the UL5 protein alone contained the defining helicase amino acid sequence motifs, the UL5 protein does not display helicase activity in vitro in the absence of the UL52 protein. Purified UL5 protein has less than 1% of the ATPase activity of the complex UL5-UL8-UL52 (UL5/8/52) complex (2, 43). In addition, studies with recombinant herpesviruses carrying mutations in the UL5 gene that abolish helicase activity revealed that the UL5 protein could still form specific interactions with UL8 and UL52 proteins (60). These results indicate that the functional domains of UL5 protein required for helicase activity are separate from those involved in protein-protein interactions and that UL5 and UL52 must interact to yield efficient helicase activity. Further mutagenesis studies with the UL52 protein identified mutations that abolish the primase activity of the complex, while the helicase and ATPase activities are unaffected, suggesting that the UL52 protein is responsible for the primase activity of the complex (27). The third component of the helicase-primase complex, the UL8 protein, interacts with other viral replication proteins, including the OBP, the single-stranded DNA binding protein, and the viral DNA polymerase (30, 33). It has been postulated that the interaction of the UL8 protein with the OBP (encoded by the UL9 gene) may function to recruit helicase-primase complexes to initiation complexes at viral origins (30). The UL8 protein is also required for stimulation of primer synthesis by the UL52 protein and for stimulation of the helicase activity of the helicase-primase complex which is crucial to allow efficient unwinding of long stretches of duplex DNA (16, 43, 49). Additionally, UL8 appears to be required for efficient nuclear entry of the helicase-primase complex (1, 3, 31).As the UL5, UL8, and UL52 gene products are essential for HSV replication and have not been exploited previously for antiviral drug discovery, they represent attractive targets for the development of novel anti-HSV agents. Current anti-HSV drugs include vidarabine (adenine arabinoside; Ara-A), foscarnet (phosphonoformic acid; PFA), and a wide variety of nucleoside analogs, the most clinically successful being acyclovir (ACV) and its analogs valacyclovir and famciclovir. ACV is phosphorylated by viral thymidine kinase (TK) to its monophosphate form, an event that occurs to a much lesser extent in uninfected cells. Subsequent phosphorylation events by cellular enzymes convert the ACV monophosphate to its triphosphate form. The ACV triphosphate derivative directly inhibits the DNA polymerase by competing as a substrate with dGTP. Because the ACV triphosphate lacks the 3′ hydroxyl group required to elongate the DNA chain, DNA replication is terminated. The triphosphorylated form of ACV is a much better substrate for the viral DNA polymerase than it is for the cellular DNA polymerase; thus, very little ACV triphosphate is incorporated into cellular DNA. Although ACV has proven to be safe and successful at reducing the duration, severity, and in some cases recurrence of HSV infections, eradication of the infection symptoms is far from complete and latent virus can reactivate frequently (55–58). In addition, primarily as a result of poor patient compliance with inconvenient ACV dosage regimens, virulent HSV strains resistant to ACV that contain mutations in either the viral TK or DNA polymerase gene have arisen (6, 7, 9, 26, 39). More potent and efficacious drugs that target other essential components of the virus replicative cycle would be invaluable as therapeutic agents to treat HSV and ACV-resistant HSV infections.To identify novel inhibitors of the HSV helicase-primase enzyme, we developed a high-throughput in vitro helicase assay and screened >190,000 samples. Using this biochemical approach, we identified T157602, a 2-amino thiazole, as a specific inhibitor of HSV replication. By generating and analyzing T157602-resistant viruses, we further demonstrate genetically that the molecular target of T157602 is the UL5 component of the HSV helicase-primase complex.     

Reconstitution of Rad53 Activation by Mec1 through Adaptor Protein Mrc1

Upon DNA replication stress, stalled DNA replication forks serve as a platform to recruit many signaling proteins, leading to the activation of the DNA replication checkpoint. Activation of Rad53, a key effector kinase in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is essential for stabilizing DNA replication forks during replication stress. Using an activity-based assay for Rad53, we found that Mrc1, a replication fork-associated protein, cooperates with Mec1 to activate Rad53 directly. Reconstitution of Rad53 activation using purified Mec1 and Mrc1 showed that the addition of Mrc1 stimulated a more than 70-fold increase in the ability of Mec1 to activate Rad53. Instead of increasing the catalytic activity of Mec1, Mrc1 was found to facilitate the phosphorylation of Rad53 by Mec1 via promotion of a stronger enzyme-substrate interaction between them. Further, the conserved C-terminal domain of Mrc1 was found to be required for Rad53 activation. These results thus provide insights into the role of the adaptor protein Mrc1 in activating Rad53 in the DNA replication checkpoint.Faithful replication of the genome is important for the survival of all organisms. During DNA replication, replication stress can arise from a variety of situations, including intrinsic errors made by DNA polymerases, difficulties in replicating repeated DNA sequences, and failures to repair damaged DNA caused by either endogenous oxidative agents or exogenous mutagens such as UV light and DNA-damaging chemicals (1–3). In eukaryotes, there is an evolutionarily conserved DNA replication checkpoint that becomes activated in response to DNA replication stress. It helps to stabilize DNA replication forks, block late replication origin firing, and delay mitosis and ultimately helps recovery from stalled replication forks after DNA repair (4–7). Defects in the DNA replication checkpoint could result in elevated genomic instabilities, cancer development, or cell death (8, 9).Aside from replicating the genome, the DNA replication forks also provide a platform to assemble many signaling proteins that function in the DNA replication checkpoint. In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Mec1, an ortholog of human ATR,² is a phosphoinositide 3-kinase-like kinase (PIKK) involved in sensing stalled DNA replication forks. Mec1 forms a protein complex with Ddc2 (ortholog of human ATRIP). The Mec1-Ddc2 complex is recruited to stalled replication forks through replication protein A (RPA)-coated single-stranded DNA (10, 11). The Mec3-Rad17-Ddc1 complex, a proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA)-like checkpoint clamp and ortholog of the human 9-1-1 complex, was shown to be loaded onto the single- and double-stranded DNA junction of the stalled replication forks by the clamp loader Rad24-RFC complex (12). Once loaded, the Mec3-Rad17-Ddc1 complex stimulates Mec1 kinase activity (13). Dbp11 and its homolog TopBP1 in vertebrates are known components of the replication machinery (14). In addition to regulating the initiation of DNA replication, they were found to play a role in the DNA replication checkpoint (15–17). They interact with the 9-1-1 complex and directly stimulate Mec1/ATR activity in vitro (18–20). Thus, the assembly of multiple protein complexes at stalled DNA replication forks appears to facilitate activation of the DNA replication checkpoint (13, 18).Mrc1 (for mediator of replication checkpoint) was originally identified to be important for cells to respond to hydroxyurea in S. cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe (21, 22). Mrc1 is a component of the DNA replisome and travels with the replication forks along chromosome during DNA synthesis (23–25). Deletion of MRC1 causes defects in DNA replication, indicating its role in the normal progression of DNA replication (23). Interestingly, when DNA replication is blocked by hydroxyurea, Mrc1 undergoes Mec1- and Rad3 (S. pombe ortholog of Mec1)-dependent phosphorylation (21, 22). In S. cerevisiae, mutations of Mrc1 at the (S/T)Q sites, which are consensus phosphorylation sites of the Mec1/ATR family kinases, abolishes hydroxyurea-induced Mrc1 phosphorylation in vivo, suggesting a direct phosphorylation of Mrc1 by Mec1 (21, 22).Rad53 and Cds1, homologs of human Chk2, are the major effector kinases in the DNA replication checkpoints in S. cerevisiae and S. pombe, respectively. Activation of Rad53 is a hallmark of DNA replication checkpoint activation and is important for the maintenance of DNA replication forks in response to DNA replication stress (5, 6). Thus, it is important to understand how Rad53 activity is controlled. Interestingly, mutation of all the (S/T)Q sites of Mrc1 not only abolishes the phosphorylation of Mrc1 by Mec1 but also compromises hydroxyurea-induced Rad53 activation in S. cerevisiae (21). Similarly, mutation of the TQ sites of Mrc1 in S. pombe was shown to abolish the binding between Cds1 and Mrc1 as well as Cds1 activation (22). Further, mutation of specific TQ sites of Mrc1 in S. pombe abolishes its binding to Cds1 in vitro and the activation of Cds1 in vivo (26). Thus, Mec1/Rad3-dependent phosphorylation of Mrc1 is responsible for Mrc1 binding to Rad53/Cds1, which is essential for Rad53/Cds1 activation.An intriguing property of the Chk2 family kinases is their ability to undergo autophosphorylation and activation in the absence of other proteins in vitro (27, 28). First, autophosphorylation of a conserved threonine residue in the activation loop of Chk2 family kinase was found to be an essential part of their activation processes (26, 29–31). Second, a direct and trans-phosphorylation of the N-terminal TQ sites of the Chk2 family kinases by the Mec1/ATR family kinases is also important for their activation in vivo. Analogous to the requirement of N-terminal TQ site phosphorylation of Chk2 by ATR in human (32), the activation of Rad53/Cds1 in vivo requires phosphorylation of TQ sites in their N termini by Mec1/Rad3 (33, 34).Considering that Mec1, Mrc1, and many other proteins are recruited at stalled DNA replication forks and have been shown to be involved in DNA replication checkpoint activation, a key question remains unresolved: what is the minimal system that is capable of activating Rad53 directly? Given the direct physical interaction between Mrc1 and Rad53 and the requirement of Mrc1 and Mec1 in vivo, it is likely that they both play a role in Rad53 activation. Furthermore, what is the molecular mechanism of Rad53 activation by its upstream activators? To address these questions, a faithful reconstitution of the activation of Rad53 using purified proteins is necessary. In this study, we developed an activity-based assay consisting of the Dun1 kinase, a downstream substrate of Rad53, and Sml1, as a substrate of Dun1, to quantitatively measure the activity of Rad53. Using this coupled kinase assay from Rad53 to Dun1 and then to Sml1, we screened for Mrc1 and its associated factors to see whether they could directly activate Rad53 in vitro. Our results showed that Mec1 and Mrc1 collaborate to constitute a minimal system in direct activation of Rad53.     

Evidence of a Role for Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase Activation in the Blocking of Apoptosis by Polyomavirus Middle T Antigen

A polyomavirus mutant (315YF) blocked in binding phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI 3-kinase) has previously been shown to be partially deficient in transformation and to induce fewer tumors and with a significant delay compared to wild-type virus. The role of polyomavirus middle T antigen-activated PI 3-kinase in apoptosis was investigated as a possible cause of this behavior. When grown in medium containing 1d-3-deoxy-3-fluoro-myo-inositol to block formation of 3′-phosphorylated phosphatidylinositols, F111 rat fibroblasts transformed by wild-type polyomavirus (PyF), but not normal F111 cells, showed a marked loss of viability with evidence of apoptosis. Similarly, treatment with wortmannin, an inhibitor of PI 3-kinase, stimulated apoptosis in PyF cells but not in normal cells. Activation of Akt, a serine/threonine kinase whose activity has been correlated with regulation of apoptosis, was roughly twofold higher in F111 cells transformed by either wild-type virus or mutant 250YS blocked in binding Shc compared to cells transformed by mutant 315YF. In the same cells, levels of apoptosis were inversely correlated with Akt activity. Apoptosis induced by serum withdrawal in Rat-1 cells expressing a temperature-sensitive p53 was shown to be at least partially p53 independent. Expression of either wild-type or 250YS middle T antigen inhibited apoptosis in serum-starved Rat-1 cells at both permissive and restrictive temperatures for p53. Mutant 315YF middle T antigen was partially defective for inhibition of apoptosis in these cells. The results indicate that unlike other DNA tumor viruses which block apoptosis by inactivation of p53, polyomavirus achieves protection from apoptotic death through a middle T antigen–PI 3-kinase–Akt pathway that is at least partially p53 independent.Programmed cell death occurs during normal development and under certain pathological conditions. In mammalian cells, apoptosis can be induced by a variety of stimuli, including DNA damage (45), virus infection (54, 57), oncogene activation (25), and serum withdrawal (34, 37). Apoptosis can also be blocked by a number of factors, including adenovirus E1B 55- or 19-kDa proteins (9, 16), baculovirus p35 and iap genes (10), Bcl-2 (36, 61), and survival factors (12, 21). DNA tumor viruses have evolved mechanisms that both trigger and inhibit apoptosis. These frequently involve binding and inactivation of tumor suppressor proteins. E7 in some papillomaviruses (22), E1A in adenovirus (31, 43, 64), and large T antigen in simian virus 40 (SV40) (17) bind Rb and/or p300 and lead to upregulation of p53, which is thought to trigger apoptosis in virus-infected cells. The same viruses also inhibit apoptosis by inactivating p53 by various mechanisms (44, 63, 67). In contrast, the mechanism by which polyomavirus interacts with apoptotic pathways in the cell is not known; no direct interaction with p53 by any of the proteins encoded by this virus has been demonstrated (19, 62).The principal oncoprotein of polyomavirus is the middle T antigen. Neoplastic transformation by polyomavirus middle T antigen has as a central feature its association with and activation of members of the Src family of tyrosine kinases p60^c-src (13) and p62^c-yes (42). The major known consequence of these interactions is phosphorylation of middle T antigen on specific tyrosine residues creating binding sites for other signaling proteins. Phosphorylation at tyrosines 250, 315, and 322 promotes binding to Shc (18), the p85 regulatory subunit of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI 3-kinase) (59), and phospholipase Cγ-1 (58), respectively. Recognition of multiple signaling pathways emanating from middle T antigen has led to a keen interest in identifying their downstream biochemical effects, which collectively lead to the emergence of neoplastic transformation and presumably underlie the dramatic ability of the virus to induce many kinds of tumors in the mouse.Previous work has shown that the binding of PI 3-kinase to middle T antigen is essential for full transformation of rat fibroblasts in culture (8) and for rapid development of a broad spectrum of tumors in mice (30), for translocation of the GLUT1 transporter (68), and activation of p70 S6 kinase (14). While the mutant 315YF (blocked in PI 3-kinase activation) was able to induce some tumors, it did so at reduced frequencies and with an average latency three times longer than that of either the wild-type virus or a mutant, 250YS, blocked in binding Shc (4, 30). Recent studies have indicated a role of PI 3-kinase in blocking apoptosis in nonviral systems. Growth factor receptors acting through protein tyrosine kinases may prevent apoptosis by activating PI 3-kinase in PC12 cells, T lymphocytes, hematopoietic progenitors, and rat fibroblasts (7, 48, 56, 65, 66). The failure of mutant 315YF to induce full transformation of cells in culture and to induce the rapid development of tumors in mice could therefore be related, at least in part, to a failure to block apoptosis. In this study, we focus on the question of whether middle T antigen–PI 3-kinase interaction is involved in blocking apoptosis in cells transformed by polyomavirus.     

Roles of Human AND-1 in Chromosome Transactions in S Phase

Coordinated execution of DNA replication, checkpoint activation, and postreplicative chromatid cohesion is intimately related to the replication fork machinery. Human AND-1/chromosome transmission fidelity 4 is localized adjacent to replication foci and is required for efficient DNA synthesis. In S phase, AND-1 is phosphorylated in response to replication arrest in a manner dependent on checkpoint kinase, ataxia telangiectasia-mutated, ataxia telangiectasia-mutated and Rad3-related protein, and Cdc7 kinase but not on Chk1. Depletion of AND-1 increases DNA damage, delays progression of S phase, leads to accumulation of late S and/or G₂ phase cells, and induces cell death in cancer cells. It also elevated UV-radioresistant DNA synthesis and caused premature recovery of replication after hydroxyurea arrest, indicating that lack of AND-1 compromises checkpoint activation. This may be partly due to the decreased levels of Chk1 protein in AND-1-depleted cells. Furthermore, AND-1 interacts with cohesin proteins Smc1, Smc3, and Rad21/Scc1, consistent with proposed roles of yeast counterparts of AND-1 in sister chromatid cohesion. Depletion of AND-1 leads to significant inhibition of homologous recombination repair of an I-SceI-driven double strand break. Based on these data, we propose that AND-1 coordinates multiple cellular events in S phase and G₂ phase, such as DNA replication, checkpoint activation, sister chromatid cohesion, and DNA damage repair, thus playing a pivotal role in maintenance of genome integrity.Replication fork is not only the site of DNA synthesis but also the center for coordinated execution of various chromosome transactions. The preparation for replication forks starts in the G₁ phase, when the prereplicative complex composed of origin recognition and minichromosome maintenance assembles on the chromosome. At the G₁-S boundary, Cdc45, GINS complex, and other factors join the prereplicative complex to generate a complex capable of initiating DNA replication. A series of phosphorylation events mediated by cyclin-dependent kinase and Cdc7 kinase play crucial roles in this process and facilitate the generation of active replication forks (1–6). Purification of the putative replisome complex in yeast indicated the presence of the checkpoint mediator Mrc1 and fork protection complex proteins Tof1 and Csm3 in the replication fork machinery (7), consistent with a previous report on the genome-wide analyses with chromatin immunoprecipitation analyses on chip (microarray) (8). Mcm10 is another factor present in the isolated complex, required for loading of replication protein A (RPA)² and primase-DNA polymerase α onto the replisome complex (7, 9, 10).Replication fork machinery can cope with various stresses, including shortage of the cellular nucleotide pool and replication fork blockages that interfere with its progression. Stalled replication forks activate checkpoint pathways, leading to cell cycle arrest, DNA repair, restart of DNA replication, or cell death in some cases (11–14). Single-stranded DNAs coated with RPA at the stalled replication forks are recognized by the ATR-ATR-interacting protein kinase complex and Rad17 for loading of the Rad9-Rad1-Hus1 checkpoint clamp (14–16). Factors present in the replisome complex are also known to be required for checkpoint activation. Claspin, Tim, and Tipin functionally and physically associate with sensor and effector kinases and serve as mediator/adaptors (17–23). Mcm7, a component of the replicative DNA helicase in eukaryotes, was reported to associate with the checkpoint clamp loader Rad17 (24) and to have a distinct function in checkpoint (24, 25). We recently reported that Cdc7 kinase, known to be required for DNA replication initiation, plays a role in activation of DNA replication checkpoint possibly through regulating Claspin phosphorylation (26). Thus, it appears that DNA replication and checkpoint activation functionally and physically interact with each other.Another crucial cellular event for maintenance of genome stability is sister chromatid cohesion. The cohesin complex, a conserved apparatus required for sister chromatid cohesion, contains Smc1, Smc3, and Rad21/Scc1/Mcd1 proteins. The assembled cohesin complexes are loaded onto chromatin prior to DNA replication in G₁ phase and link the sister chromosomes during S and G₂ phase until mitosis when they separate (27, 28). The mitotic cohesion defects are not rescued by supplementing cohesin in G₂ phase, and it has been suggested that establishment of sister chromatid cohesion is coupled with DNA replication (29, 30). Indeed, yeast mutants in some replisome components show defect in sister chromosome cohesion or undergo chromosome loss (31–33). Cdc7 kinase is also required for efficient mitotic chromosome cohesion (34, 35).Human AND-1 is the putative homolog of budding yeast CTF4/Pob1/CHL15 and fission yeast Mcl1/Slr3. The budding yeast counterpart was identified as a replisome component described above (7), which travels along with the replication fork (29). CTF4 is nonessential for viability, but its interactions with primase, Rad2 (FEN1 family of nuclease), and Dna2 have implicated CTF4 in lagging strand synthesis and/or Okazaki fragment processing (36–39). Yeast CTF4 and Mcl1 are involved in chromosome cohesion (33, 40, 41) and genetically interact with a cohesin, Mcd1/Rad21 (40, 42). Recently, it was reported that human AND-1 protein interacts with human primase-DNA polymerase α and Mcm10 and is required for DNA synthesis (43).Here we confirm that human AND-1 protein is required for DNA replication and efficient progression of S phase, and we further show that it facilitates replication checkpoint. Depletion of AND-1 causes accumulation of DNA damage and cell cycle arrest at late S to G₂ phase, ultimately leading to cell death. Furthermore, we also show that human AND-1 physically interacts with cohesin proteins Smc1, Smc3, Rad21/Scc1, suggesting a possibility that AND-1 may physically and functionally link replisome and cohesin complexes in vivo. Recent studies indicate that sister chromatid cohesion is required for recombinational DNA repair (44–47). Thus, we examined the requirement of AND-1 for repair of artificially induced double-stranded DNA breaks and showed that AND-1 depletion leads to significant reduction of the double strand break repair. Possible roles of AND-1 in coordination of various chromosome transactions at a replication fork and in maintenance of genome integrity during S phase will be discussed.