Reconstitution of Uracil DNA Glycosylase-initiated Base Excision Repair in Herpes Simplex Virus-1

Herpes simplex virus-1 is a large double-stranded DNA virus that is self-sufficient in a number of genome transactions. Hence, the virus encodes its own DNA replication apparatus and is capable of mediating recombination reactions. We recently reported that the catalytic subunit of the HSV-1 DNA polymerase (UL30) exhibits apurinic/apyrimidinic and 5′-deoxyribose phosphate lyase activities that are integral to base excision repair. Base excision repair is required to maintain genome stability as a means to counter the accumulation of unusual bases and to protect from the loss of DNA bases. Here we have reconstituted a system with purified HSV-1 and human proteins that perform all the steps of uracil DNA glycosylase-initiated base excision repair. In this system nucleotide incorporation is dependent on the HSV-1 uracil DNA glycosylase (UL2), human AP endonuclease, and the HSV-1 DNA polymerase. Completion of base excision repair can be mediated by T4 DNA ligase as well as human DNA ligase I or ligase IIIα-XRCC1 complex. Of these, ligase IIIα-XRCC1 is the most efficient. Moreover, ligase IIIα-XRCC1 confers specificity onto the reaction in as much as it allows ligation to occur in the presence of the HSV-1 DNA polymerase processivity factor (UL42) and prevents base excision repair from occurring with heterologous DNA polymerases. Completion of base excision repair in this system is also dependent on the incorporation of the correct nucleotide. These findings demonstrate that the HSV-1 proteins in combination with cellular factors that are not encoded by the virus are capable of performing base excision repair. These results have implications on the role of base excision repair in viral genome maintenance during lytic replication and reactivation from latency.Herpes simplex virus-1 (HSV-1)² is a large double-stranded DNA virus with a genome of ∼152 kilobase pairs (for reviews, see Refs. 1 and 2). HSV-1 switches between lytic replication in epithelial cells and a state of latency in sensory neurons during which there is no detectable DNA replication (1). Viral DNA replication is mediated by seven essential virus-encoded factors (3–5). Of these, two encode subunits of the viral replicase (for review, see Refs. 6 and 7). The catalytic subunit (UL30) exhibits DNA polymerase (Pol), 3′-5′ proofreading exonuclease, and RNase H activities (8–11). UL30 exists as a heterodimer with the UL42 protein that confers a high degree of processivity on the Pol (11–17).Viral DNA replication is accompanied by vigorous recombination that leads to the formation of large networks of viral DNA replication intermediates (18). The HSV-1 single-strand DNA-binding protein (ICP8) has been shown to play a major role in mediating these recombination reactions (19–21). One role for the high frequency of recombination is to restart DNA replication at sites of fork collapse. Further mechanisms that contribute to genome maintenance are processes that survey and repair damage to the DNA to ensure the availability of a robust replication template. In this regard base excision repair (BER) is essential to remove unusual bases from the DNA and to repair apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) sites resulting from spontaneous base loss (for review, see Ref. 22). With respect to HSV-1, a recent study showed that viral DNA from infected cultured fibroblasts contains a steady state of 2.8–5.9 AP sites per viral genome equivalent (23). Because AP sites are non-instructional, the failure to repair such sites would terminate viral replication. Indeed, UL30 cannot replicate beyond a model AP site (tetrahydrofuran residue) (23), indicating that the virus must enable a process to repair such lesions. In this regard HSV-1 possesses several enzymes that would safeguard from the accumulation of unusual bases, specifically uracil, and base loss. Hence, HSV-1 encodes a uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG) (UL2) as well as a dUTPase to reduce the pool of dUTP and prevent misincorporation by the viral Pol (24, 25). Moreover, we recently showed that the catalytic subunit of the viral Pol (UL30) exhibits AP and 5′-deoxyribose phosphate (dRP) lyase activities (26). The presence of a virus-encoded UDG and DNA lyase indicates that HSV-1 has the capacity to perform integral steps of BER, specifically for the removal of uracil. Indeed, the excision of uracil may be important for viral replication. Hence, it has been shown that uracil substitutions in the viral origins of replication alters their recognition by the viral initiator protein (27). Moreover, whereas UL2 may be dispensable for viral replication in fibroblast (24), UL2 mutants exhibit reduced neurovirulence and a decreased frequency of reactivation from latency (28). Thus, UDG action in HSV-1 may be important for viral reactivation after quiescence in neuronal cells during which the genome may accumulate uracil as a result of spontaneous deamination of cytosine. In another herpesvirus, cytomegalovirus, the viral UDG was shown to be required for the transition to late-phase DNA replication (29, 30). Consequently, it is possible that BER plays a significant role in various aspects of the herpesvirus life cycle.In mammalian single-nucleotide BER initiated by monofunctional DNA glycosylases, the resulting AP sites are incised hydrolytically at the 5′ side by AP endonuclease (APE), generating a 3′-OH. This is followed by template-directed incorporation of one nucleotide by Pol β to generate a 5′-dRP flap (22, 31, 32). The 5′-dRP residue is subsequently removed by the 5′-dRP lyase activity of Pol β to leave a nick with a 3′-OH and 5′-phosphate that is ligated by DNA ligase I or the physiologically more relevant ligase IIIα-XRCC1 complex (for review, see Refs. 33 and 34). Here we show that the HSV-1 UDG (UL2) and Pol (UL30) cooperate with human APE and human ligase IIIα-XRCC1 complex to perform BER in vitro. This finding has implications on the role of BER in viral genome maintenance during lytic replication and in the emergence of the virus from neuronal latency.     

Efficient Gap Repair Catalyzed In Vitro by an Intrinsic DNA Polymerase Activity of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Integrase

Cleavage and DNA joining reactions, carried out by human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) integrase, are necessary to effect the covalent insertion of HIV-1 DNA into the host genome. For the integration of HIV-1 DNA into the cellular genome to be completed, short gaps flanking the integrated proviral DNA must be repaired. It has been widely assumed that host cell DNA repair enzymes are involved. Here we report that HIV-1 integrase multimers possess an intrinsic DNA-dependent DNA polymerase activity. The activity was characterized by its dependence on Mg²⁺, resistance to N-ethylmaleimide, and inhibition by 3′-azido-2′,3′-dideoxythymidine-5′-triphosphate, coumermycin A₁, and pyridoxal 5′-phosphate. The enzyme efficiently utilized poly(dA)-oligo(dT) or self-annealing oligonucleotides as a template primer but displayed relatively low activity with gapped calf thymus DNA and no activity with poly(dA) or poly(rA)-oligo(dT). A monoclonal antibody binding specifically to an epitope comprised of amino acids 264 to 273 near the C terminus of HIV-1 integrase severely inhibited the DNA polymerase activity. A deletion of 50 amino acids at the C terminus of integrase drastically altered the gel filtration properties of the DNA polymerase, although the level of activity was unaffected by this mutation. The DNA polymerase efficiently extended a hairpin DNA primer up to 19 nucleotides on a T₂₀ DNA template, although addition of the last nucleotide occurred infrequently or not at all. The ability of integrase to repair gaps in DNA was also investigated. We designed a series of gapped molecules containing a single-stranded region flanked by a duplex U5 viral arm on one side and by a duplex nonviral arm on the other side. Molecules varied structurally depending on the size of the gap (one, two, five, or seven nucleotides), their content of T’s or C’s in the single-stranded region, whether the CA dinucleotide in the viral arm had been replaced with a nonviral sequence, or whether they contained 5′ AC dinucleotides as unpaired tails. The results indicated that the integrase DNA polymerase is specifically designed to repair gaps efficiently and completely, regardless of gap size, base composition, or structural features such as the internal CA dinucleotide or unpaired 5′-terminal AC dinucleotides. When the U5 arm of the gapped DNA substrate was removed, leaving a nongapped DNA template-primer, the integrase DNA polymerase failed to repair the last nucleotide in the DNA template effectively. A post-gap repair reaction did depend on the CA dinucleotide. This secondary reaction was highly regulated. Only two nucleotides beyond the gap were synthesized, and these were complementary to and dependent for their synthesis on the CA dinucleotide. We were also able to identify a specific requirement for the C terminus of integrase in the post-gap repair reaction. The results are consistent with a direct role for a heretofore unsuspected DNA polymerase function of HIV-1 integrase in the repair of short gaps flanking proviral DNA integration intermediates that arise during virus infection.Integration of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) DNA is an essential step in the replicative cycle of the virus (6, 13, 16, 29, 41). The initial steps whereby HIV-1 DNA becomes covalently associated with the host DNA are mediated by the viral integrase protein. Two distinct chemical reactions are involved. In a processing step, integrase cleaves viral DNA endonucleolytically, resulting in the removal of a GT dinucleotide from the 3′ ends of the DNA (15, 48, 51). Once in the nucleus, concerted cleavage and DNA strand transfer reactions, involving viral and host DNA, enable the processed 3′ termini to become covalently joined to a host DNA target site. The intermediate produced in this manner contains unpaired 5′ ends adjacent to five-base gaps. Completion of integration requires the repair of these gaps and the joining of the 5′ ends of viral DNA to the host DNA (2). The relatively rapid kinetics of 5′-end joining in vivo has been used as a basis on which to argue in favor of a role for integrase in this step of integration (40). Although integrase can catalyze the latter reaction in vitro, albeit inefficiently (28), it has been generally assumed that host cell enzymes perform gap repair and 5′-end joining.Structural, functional, and mutational studies have defined integrase as a 32-kDa protein that can be divided into three distinct functional domains (50). The catalytic core, including amino acids 50 to 212, contains a triad of acidic amino acids (Asp 64, Asp 116, and Glu 152) that form a highly conserved D,D-35-E motif. In the three-dimensional crystal structure, these amino acids are in close proximity (10). Mutation of any one of these acidic residues severely hampers the ability of integrase to catalyze endonucleolytic cleavage and DNA strand transfer (5, 9, 12, 13, 27, 31, 32). The C terminus binds DNA nonspecifically and is required for cleavage and integration activity (47, 49, 52, 53). The amino terminus contains a zinc finger or HHCC motif, which coordinates a molar equivalent of zinc (4). This domain influences DNA binding (21, 25, 47), although it does not bind DNA on its own (26, 38).In the functional integration complex, integrase is believed to act as a multimer (11, 24, 46). Transcomplementation, in which DNA strand transfer and cleavage activities are restored by mixing nonfunctional mutants, implies that the active form of integrase is minimally a dimer (46). Integrase can exist in equilibrium between dimeric and tetrameric forms, and multimerization determinants can be identified within the integrase protein (1). Association of one molar equivalent of zinc with a soluble mutant of integrase favored the formation of the tetrameric form of the protein (54).The present study was undertaken to further characterize HIV-1 integrase by searching for novel enzymatic activities that may be associated with this viral protein. We chose specifically to look for an associated DNA polymerase activity in an attempt to elucidate the final steps in integration, namely, gap repair and 5′-end joining.