PTIP Regulates 53BP1 and SMC1 at the DNA Damage Sites

Although PTIP is implicated in the DNA damage response, through interactions with 53BP1, the function of PTIP in the DNA damage response remain elusive. Here, we show that RNF8 controls DNA damage-induced nuclear foci formation of PTIP, which in turn regulates 53BP1 localization to the DNA damage sites. In addition, SMC1, a substrate of ATM, could not be phosphorylated at the DNA damage sites in the absence of PTIP. The PTIP-dependent pathway is important for DNA double strand breaks repair and DNA damage-induced intra-S phase checkpoint activation. Taken together, these results suggest that the role of PTIP in the DNA damage response is downstream of RNF8 and upstream of 53BP1. Thus, PTIP regulates 53BP1-dependent signaling pathway following DNA damage.The DNA damage response pathways are signal transduction pathways with DNA damage sensors, mediators, and effectors, which are essential for maintaining genomic stability (1–3). Following DNA double strand breaks, histone H2AX at the DNA damage sites is rapidly phosphorylated by ATM/ATR/DNAPK (4–10), a family homologous to phosphoinositide 3-kinases (11, 12). Subsequently, phospho-H2AX (γH2AX) provides the platform for accumulation of a larger group of DNA damage response factors, such as MDC1, BRCA1, 53BP1, and the MRE11·RAD50·NBS1 complex (13, 14), at the DNA damage sites. Translocalization of these proteins to the DNA double strand breaks (DSBs)³ facilitates DNA damage checkpoint activation and enhances the efficiency of DNA damage repair (14, 15).Recently, PTIP (Pax2 transactivation domain-interacting protein, or Paxip) has been identified as a DNA damage response protein and is required for cell survival when exposed to ionizing radiation (IR) (1, 16–18). PTIP is a 1069-amino acid nuclear protein and has been originally identified in a yeast two-hybrid screening as a partner of Pax2 (19). Genetic deletion of the PTIP gene in mice leads to early embryonic lethality at embryonic day 8.5, suggesting that PTIP is essential for early embryonic development (20). Structurally, PTIP contains six tandem BRCT (BRCA1 carboxyl-terminal) domains (16–18, 21). The BRCT domain is a phospho-group binding domain that mediates protein-protein interactions (17, 22, 23). Interestingly, the BRCT domain has been found in a large number of proteins involved in the cellular response to DNA damages, such as BRCA1, MDC1, and 53BP1 (7, 24–29). Like other BRCT domain-containing proteins, upon exposure to IR, PTIP forms nuclear foci at the DSBs, which is dependent on its BRCT domains (16–18). By protein affinity purification, PTIP has been found in two large complexes. One includes the histone H3K4 methyltransferase ALR and its associated cofactors, the other contains DNA damage response proteins, including 53BP1 and SMC1 (30, 31). Further experiments have revealed that DNA damage enhances the interaction between PTIP and 53BP1 (18, 31).To elucidate the DNA damage response pathways, we have examined the upstream and downstream partners of PTIP. Here, we report that PTIP is downstream of RNF8 and upstream of 53BP1 in response to DNA damage. Moreover, PTIP and 53BP1 are required for the phospho-ATM association with the chromatin, which phosphorylates SMC1 at the DSBs. This PTIP-dependent pathway is involved in DSBs repair.     

Evidence of a Role for Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase Activation in the Blocking of Apoptosis by Polyomavirus Middle T Antigen

A polyomavirus mutant (315YF) blocked in binding phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI 3-kinase) has previously been shown to be partially deficient in transformation and to induce fewer tumors and with a significant delay compared to wild-type virus. The role of polyomavirus middle T antigen-activated PI 3-kinase in apoptosis was investigated as a possible cause of this behavior. When grown in medium containing 1d-3-deoxy-3-fluoro-myo-inositol to block formation of 3′-phosphorylated phosphatidylinositols, F111 rat fibroblasts transformed by wild-type polyomavirus (PyF), but not normal F111 cells, showed a marked loss of viability with evidence of apoptosis. Similarly, treatment with wortmannin, an inhibitor of PI 3-kinase, stimulated apoptosis in PyF cells but not in normal cells. Activation of Akt, a serine/threonine kinase whose activity has been correlated with regulation of apoptosis, was roughly twofold higher in F111 cells transformed by either wild-type virus or mutant 250YS blocked in binding Shc compared to cells transformed by mutant 315YF. In the same cells, levels of apoptosis were inversely correlated with Akt activity. Apoptosis induced by serum withdrawal in Rat-1 cells expressing a temperature-sensitive p53 was shown to be at least partially p53 independent. Expression of either wild-type or 250YS middle T antigen inhibited apoptosis in serum-starved Rat-1 cells at both permissive and restrictive temperatures for p53. Mutant 315YF middle T antigen was partially defective for inhibition of apoptosis in these cells. The results indicate that unlike other DNA tumor viruses which block apoptosis by inactivation of p53, polyomavirus achieves protection from apoptotic death through a middle T antigen–PI 3-kinase–Akt pathway that is at least partially p53 independent.Programmed cell death occurs during normal development and under certain pathological conditions. In mammalian cells, apoptosis can be induced by a variety of stimuli, including DNA damage (45), virus infection (54, 57), oncogene activation (25), and serum withdrawal (34, 37). Apoptosis can also be blocked by a number of factors, including adenovirus E1B 55- or 19-kDa proteins (9, 16), baculovirus p35 and iap genes (10), Bcl-2 (36, 61), and survival factors (12, 21). DNA tumor viruses have evolved mechanisms that both trigger and inhibit apoptosis. These frequently involve binding and inactivation of tumor suppressor proteins. E7 in some papillomaviruses (22), E1A in adenovirus (31, 43, 64), and large T antigen in simian virus 40 (SV40) (17) bind Rb and/or p300 and lead to upregulation of p53, which is thought to trigger apoptosis in virus-infected cells. The same viruses also inhibit apoptosis by inactivating p53 by various mechanisms (44, 63, 67). In contrast, the mechanism by which polyomavirus interacts with apoptotic pathways in the cell is not known; no direct interaction with p53 by any of the proteins encoded by this virus has been demonstrated (19, 62).The principal oncoprotein of polyomavirus is the middle T antigen. Neoplastic transformation by polyomavirus middle T antigen has as a central feature its association with and activation of members of the Src family of tyrosine kinases p60^c-src (13) and p62^c-yes (42). The major known consequence of these interactions is phosphorylation of middle T antigen on specific tyrosine residues creating binding sites for other signaling proteins. Phosphorylation at tyrosines 250, 315, and 322 promotes binding to Shc (18), the p85 regulatory subunit of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI 3-kinase) (59), and phospholipase Cγ-1 (58), respectively. Recognition of multiple signaling pathways emanating from middle T antigen has led to a keen interest in identifying their downstream biochemical effects, which collectively lead to the emergence of neoplastic transformation and presumably underlie the dramatic ability of the virus to induce many kinds of tumors in the mouse.Previous work has shown that the binding of PI 3-kinase to middle T antigen is essential for full transformation of rat fibroblasts in culture (8) and for rapid development of a broad spectrum of tumors in mice (30), for translocation of the GLUT1 transporter (68), and activation of p70 S6 kinase (14). While the mutant 315YF (blocked in PI 3-kinase activation) was able to induce some tumors, it did so at reduced frequencies and with an average latency three times longer than that of either the wild-type virus or a mutant, 250YS, blocked in binding Shc (4, 30). Recent studies have indicated a role of PI 3-kinase in blocking apoptosis in nonviral systems. Growth factor receptors acting through protein tyrosine kinases may prevent apoptosis by activating PI 3-kinase in PC12 cells, T lymphocytes, hematopoietic progenitors, and rat fibroblasts (7, 48, 56, 65, 66). The failure of mutant 315YF to induce full transformation of cells in culture and to induce the rapid development of tumors in mice could therefore be related, at least in part, to a failure to block apoptosis. In this study, we focus on the question of whether middle T antigen–PI 3-kinase interaction is involved in blocking apoptosis in cells transformed by polyomavirus.     

Bloom Syndrome Helicase Stimulates RAD51 DNA Strand Exchange Activity through a Novel Mechanism

Loss or inactivation of BLM, a helicase of the RecQ family, causes Bloom syndrome, a genetic disorder with a strong predisposition to cancer. Although the precise function of BLM remains unknown, genetic data has implicated BLM in the process of genetic recombination and DNA repair. Previously, we demonstrated that BLM can disrupt the RAD51-single-stranded DNA filament that promotes the initial steps of homologous recombination. However, this disruption occurs only if RAD51 is present in an inactive ADP-bound form. Here, we investigate interactions of BLM with the active ATP-bound form of the RAD51-single-stranded DNA filament. Surprisingly, we found that BLM stimulates DNA strand exchange activity of RAD51. In contrast to the helicase activity of BLM, this stimulation does not require ATP hydrolysis. These data suggest a novel BLM function that is stimulation of the RAD51 DNA pairing. Our results demonstrate the important role of the RAD51 nucleoprotein filament conformation in stimulation of DNA pairing by BLM.Mutations of BLM helicase cause Bloom syndrome (BS),² a rare autosomal disorder, which is associated with stunted growth, facial sun sensitivity, immunodeficiency, fertility defects, and a greatly elevated incidence of many types of cancer occurring at an early age (1). BLM belongs to the highly conserved family of RecQ helicases that are required for the maintenance of genome integrity in all organisms (2, 3). There are five RecQ helicases in humans; mutations in three of them, WRN, RECQ4, and BLM, have been associated with the genetic abnormalities known as Werner, Rothmund-Thomson, and Bloom syndrome, respectively (4, 5). The cells from BS patients display genomic instability; the hallmark of BS is an increase in the frequency of sister chromatid and interhomolog exchanges (1, 6). Because homologous recombination (HR) is responsible for chromosomal exchanges, it is thought that BLM helicase functions in regulating HR (7–9). Also, BLM helicase is required for faithful chromosome segregation (10) and repair of stalled replication forks (11, 12), the processes that are linked to HR (13–15). BLM was found to interact physically with RAD51, a key protein of HR (16) that catalyzes the central steps in HR including the search for homology and the exchange of strands between homologous ssDNA and dsDNA sequences (17). In cells, BLM forms nuclear foci, a subset of which co-localize with RAD51. Interestingly, the extent of RAD51 and BLM co-localization increases in response to ionizing radiation, indicating a possible role of BLM in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (16).Biochemical studies suggest that BLM may perform several different functions in HR. BLM was shown to promote the dissociation of HR intermediates (D-loops) (18–20), branch migration of Holliday junctions (21), and dissolution of double Holliday junctions acting in a complex with TopoIIIα and BLAP75 (22–24). BLM may also facilitate DNA synthesis during the repair process by unwinding the DNA template in front of the replication fork (25). In addition, BLM and its yeast homolog Sgs1 may play a role at the initial steps of DNA double-strand break repair by participating in exonucleolitic resection of the DNA ends to generate DNA molecules with the 3′-ssDNA tails, a substrate for RAD51 binding (26–29).In vivo, the process of HR is tightly regulated by various mechanisms (30). Whereas some proteins promote HR (14, 31), others inhibit this process, thereby preventing its untimely initiation (32, 33). Disruption of the Rad51-ssDNA nucleoprotein filament appears to be an especially important mechanism of controlling HR. This filament disruption activity was demonstrated for the yeast Srs2 helicase (34, 35) and human RECQ5 helicase (36). Recently, we found that BLM can also catalyze disruption of the RAD51-ssDNA filament (25). This disruption only occurs if the filament is present in an inactive ADP-bound form, e.g. in the presence of Mg²⁺. Conversion of RAD51 into an active ATP-bound form, e.g. in the presence of Ca²⁺ (37), renders the filament resistant to BLM disruption (25). In this study, we analyze the interactions of BLM with an active ATP-bound RAD51-ssDNA filament. Surprisingly, we found that BLM stimulates the DNA strand exchange activity of RAD51. Thus, depending on the conformational state of the RAD51 nucleoprotein filament, BLM may either inhibit or stimulate the DNA strand exchange activity of RAD51. Our analysis demonstrated that, in contrast to several known stimulatory proteins that act by promoting formation of the RAD51-ssDNA filament, BLM stimulates the DNA strand exchange activity of RAD51 at a later stage, during synapsis. Stimulation appears to be independent of the ATPase activity of BLM. We suggest that this stimulation of RAD51 may represent a novel function of BLM in homologous recombination.     

Analysis of Free Energy Signals Arising from Nucleotide Hybridization Between rRNA and mRNA Sequences during Translation in Eubacteria

A decoding algorithm is tested that mechanistically models the progressive alignments that arise as the mRNA moves past the rRNA tail during translation elongation. Each of these alignments provides an opportunity for hybridization between the single-stranded, -terminal nucleotides of the 16S rRNA and the spatially accessible window of mRNA sequence, from which a free energy value can be calculated. Using this algorithm we show that a periodic, energetic pattern of frequency 1/3 is revealed. This periodic signal exists in the majority of coding regions of eubacterial genes, but not in the non-coding regions encoding the 16S and 23S rRNAs. Signal analysis reveals that the population of coding regions of each bacterial species has a mean phase that is correlated in a statistically significant way with species () content. These results suggest that the periodic signal could function as a synchronization signal for the maintenance of reading frame and that codon usage provides a mechanism for manipulation of signal phase.[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]     

Algorithms for Finding Small Attractors in Boolean Networks

A Boolean network is a model used to study the interactions between different genes in genetic regulatory networks. In this paper, we present several algorithms using gene ordering and feedback vertex sets to identify singleton attractors and small attractors in Boolean networks. We analyze the average case time complexities of some of the proposed algorithms. For instance, it is shown that the outdegree-based ordering algorithm for finding singleton attractors works in time for , which is much faster than the naive time algorithm, where is the number of genes and is the maximum indegree. We performed extensive computational experiments on these algorithms, which resulted in good agreement with theoretical results. In contrast, we give a simple and complete proof for showing that finding an attractor with the shortest period is NP-hard.[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]     

C-terminal Phenylalanine of Bacteriophage T7 Single-stranded DNA-binding Protein Is Essential for Strand Displacement Synthesis by T7 DNA Polymerase at a Nick in DNA

Single-stranded DNA-binding protein (gp2.5), encoded by gene 2.5 of bacteriophage T7, plays an essential role in DNA replication. Not only does it remove impediments of secondary structure in the DNA, it also modulates the activities of the other replication proteins. The acidic C-terminal tail of gp2.5, bearing a C-terminal phenylalanine, physically and functionally interacts with the helicase and DNA polymerase. Deletion of the phenylalanine or substitution with a nonaromatic amino acid gives rise to a dominant lethal phenotype, and the altered gp2.5 has reduced affinity for T7 DNA polymerase. Suppressors of the dominant lethal phenotype have led to the identification of mutations in gene 5 that encodes the T7 DNA polymerase. The altered residues in the polymerase are solvent-exposed and lie in regions that are adjacent to the bound DNA. gp2.5 lacking the C-terminal phenylalanine has a lower affinity for gp5-thioredoxin relative to the wild-type gp2.5, and this affinity is partially restored by the suppressor mutations in DNA polymerase. gp2.5 enables T7 DNA polymerase to catalyze strand displacement DNA synthesis at a nick in DNA. The resulting 5′-single-stranded DNA tail provides a loading site for T7 DNA helicase. gp2.5 lacking the C-terminal phenylalanine does not support this event with wild-type DNA polymerase but does to a limited extent with T7 DNA polymerase harboring the suppressor mutations.Single-stranded DNA (ssDNA)³-binding proteins have been assigned the role of removing secondary structure in DNA and protecting ssDNA from hydrolysis by nucleases (1). However, in addition to these mundane roles, ssDNA-binding proteins are now recognized as a key component of the replisome where they physically and functionally interact with other replication proteins and with the primer-template (2–4). ssDNA-binding proteins are also engaged in DNA recombination and repair (5). In view of these multiple roles, it has been difficult to identify the specific defect in genetically altered ssDNA-binding proteins that leads to an observed phenotype.The crystal structures of several prokaryotic ssDNA-binding proteins have been determined (6–8). These proteins have a conserved oligosaccharide-oligonucleotide binding fold (OB-fold) that is thought to bind the ssDNA by means of stacking and electrostatic interactions (6). Prokaryotic ssDNA-binding proteins also have an acidic C-terminal tail that is essential for bacterial and phage growth (9–13).The ssDNA-binding protein of bacteriophage T7 is encoded by gene 2.5 (14). The gene 2.5 protein (gp2.5) is a homodimer in solution, a structure that is stabilized by its C-terminal tail (9, 15). The C-terminal tail of one monomer of gp2.5 binds in a trans mode to the ssDNA-binding cleft of the other subunit, thus stabilizing the dimer interface observed in the crystal structure (6). The current model proposes that the positively charged DNA-binding cleft is shielded by the electrostatic charges of the C-terminal tail in the absence of ssDNA, thus facilitating oligomerization of gp2.5. Upon binding ssDNA, the dimer dissociates to allow the C-terminal tail to interact with other replication proteins (16). The tail modulates the affinity for ssDNA and protein-protein interactions by functioning as a two-way switch (6, 17). This mode of function is applicable to other prokaryotic ssDNA-binding proteins, namely Escherichia coli SSB protein and T4 gp32 (10, 13, 15, 18–22).gp2.5 is one of four proteins that include the T7 replisome. The other three proteins are the T7 gene 5 DNA polymerase (gp5), its processivity factor, E. coli thioredoxin (trx), and the multifunctional gene 4 helicase-primase (gp4). gp5 and trx bind with high affinity (K_D of 5 nm), and the two proteins are normally found in complex (gp5/trx) at a stoichiometry of one to one (23). The acidic C-terminal tail of gp2.5 is critical for the interactions of the protein with gp5/trx and gp4 (9, 24). The C-terminal tail binds to a positively charged segment located in the thumb subdomain of the gp5 (25). This fragment, designated the trx binding domain (TBD), is also the site of binding of the processivity factor, E. coli trx, and the C terminus of gp4. The multiple interactions of the C terminus of gp2.5 could thus function to coordinate the dynamic reactions occurring at the replication fork. gp2.5 is known to be critical for establishing coordination during leading and lagging strand DNA synthesis (26, 27).This C-terminal tail of gp2.5 is an acidic 26-amino acid segment with an aromatic phenylalanine as the C-terminal residue. The C-terminal tail is not seen in the crystal structure because gp2.5Δ26, lacking the tail, was used for crystallization; the wild-type protein did not yield crystals that diffracted (6). gp2.5ΔF designates a genetically modified gp2.5 lacking the C-terminal phenylalanine. gp2.5ΔF does not support the growth of T7Δ2.5 phage lacking gene 2.5 (28). Interestingly, T7 gene 4 protein also has an acidic C-terminal tail with a C-terminal phenylalanine (29). Again, the phenylalanine is critical for the interaction of gp4 with gp5/trx (29). Further evidence for overlapping binding sites of the C termini of these two proteins comes from studies with chimeric proteins (28, 29). The C-terminal tails of gp2.5 and gp4 can be exchanged, and the chimeric proteins support the growth of T7 phage lacking the corresponding wild-type protein.We recently designed a screen for suppressors of dominant lethal mutations of gp2.5 (30). The screen identified mutations in gene 5, the structural gene for T7 DNA polymerase (Fig. 1), which suppresses the lethal phenotype of gp2.5 mutant in which the C-terminal phenylalanine was moved to the penultimate position (gp2.5ΔF232InsF231). One of the altered suppressor genes (gp5, gp5-sup1) encodes a gp5 in which where glycine at position 371 is replaced by lysine (G371K). Whereas the other (gp5-sup2) encodes a protein in which threonine 258 and alanine 411 are replaced by methionine and threonine, respectively (T258M and A411T). The suppressor mutations in gp5 are necessary and sufficient to suppress the lethal phenotype of gp2.5ΔF232InsF231. The affected residues map in proximity to aromatic residues and to residues in close proximity to DNA as seen in the crystal structure of gp5/trx in complex with DNA (31). Throughout this study, gp2.5ΔF232InsF231 mutant will be referred to as gp2.5-FD because it effectively switches the positions of the C-terminal phenylalanine and the adjacent aspartic acid. E. coli SSB protein also has a C-terminal phenylalanine, and recent studies have shown that this residue inserts into a hydrophobic region consisting of exonuclease I of E. coli (45, 46).Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.Amino acid changes in gp5 suppressor mutant polymerase(s). The amino acid changes in gp5 arising from the suppressor mutations in gene 5 are identified in the crystal structure of gp5/trx in complex with a primer-template and a nucleoside triphosphate (31). gp5 (light gray), trx (dark gray), and primer/template (red) are depicted. The suppressor mutation G371K (gp5-sup1) is shown in yellow and T258M and A411T (gp5-sup2) in orange.In this study, we have purified the two suppressor DNA polymerases and characterized them individually and in interaction with the other T7 replication proteins. Whereas wild-type gp5 binds with low affinity to gp2.5-FD, the DNA polymerases harboring the suppressor mutations bind with a higher affinity. An interesting finding is that whereas wild-type gp2.5 enables gp5/trx to catalyze strand displacement synthesis at a nick in DNA, gp2.5-FD does not support this reaction. Strand displacement synthesis is necessary for the initiation of leading strand DNA synthesis at a nick because it creates a 5′-single-stranded DNA tail for loading of the T7 helicase (32).